Open Access
Journal of the American Heart Association
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
5
SJR
2.126
CiteScore
9.4
Categories
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Areas
Medicine
Years of issue
2012-2025
journal names
Journal of the American Heart Association
J AM HEART ASSOC
Top-3 citing journals

Journal of the American Heart Association
(6811 citations)

Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
(4613 citations)

Journal of Clinical Medicine
(3533 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Harvard University
(858 publications)

Brigham and Women's Hospital
(527 publications)

Johns Hopkins University
(494 publications)

Harvard University
(427 publications)

Johns Hopkins University
(276 publications)

Brigham and Women's Hospital
(245 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 395
Q3

Qualitative and quantitative assessment of solite RE black and HyFlex remover systems for endodontic retreatment - An in vitro nano-computed tomography analysis
Valan A.S., Solete P., Antony S.D., Ramamoorthi S., Alasqah M., Arunachalam V.
Abstract
Introduction:
The successful outcome of endodontic retreatment heavily relies on the thorough removal of root canal filling materials. This study aimed to quantitatively and qualitatively assess the efficacy of various retreatment file systems using nano-computed tomography (nano-CT) imaging.
Materials and Methods:
Thirty recently extracted human mandibular molars with mesial roots having curvatures <20° were chosen and sectioned to 16 mm in length. The root canals were prepared with the ProTaper Gold system up to size F2 and they were filled with gutta percha and AH Plus sealer. After obturation, all the samples were randomly assigned to two groups (n = 15 each) for retreatment: Group 1 utilized Solite RE Black retreatment files, while Group 2 employed Coltene HyFlex Remover files. Nano-CT imaging was employed to measure pre- and postoperative volumes of remaining filling material and remaining dentin thickness and the time taken for retreatment was measured in seconds. The obtained values were analyzed statistically (P < 0.05).
Results:
Nano-CT analysis showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) in the volume of remaining filling material between the Solite RE Black and Coltene HyFlex Remover groups. However, no significant difference was observed in the time required for gutta-percha removal. The Solite RE Black system showed comparatively less dentin removal than the Coltene HyFlex Remover system (P < 0.05).
Conclusion:
The Solite RE Black retreatment file system demonstrated promising efficacy in removing filling material while preserving dentin integrity compared to the Coltene HyFlex Remover system. These findings support its potential as an effective tool for endodontic retreatment, emphasizing the need for further clinical trials to validate its performance across various clinical scenarios.
Q3

Evaluating generative pretraining transformer reliability in addressing dental trauma: A cross-sectional observational study on avulsion and intrusion
Bordin R.W., Bartnack C.C., Westphalen V.P., Gasparello G.G., Bark M.J., Gava T.N., Tanaka O.M.
Abstract
Introduction:
The advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized digital communication, enhancing interactions between humans and computers. This study explores the application of Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer 3.5 (ChatGPT-3.5), in providing accurate information on dental trauma.
Materials and Methods:
Utilizing a dataset of 45 self-generated questions across three topics, general dental trauma, avulsion, and intrusion, ChatGPT-3.5 generated responses that were subsequently evaluated by five endodontic experts, each with over a decade of experience. The evaluators used a Likert scale to assess the quality of the AI-generated answers, synthesizing reliable scientific evidence and clinical expertise to ensure a thorough analysis. The data obtained from the evaluators’ scores were organized and analyzed using Microsoft Excel software and the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 25. For each question, descriptive statistics including the median and interquartile range were computed.
Results:
The study found that ChatGPT provided reliable information across the three assessed dental topics. Avulsion was rated the highest (4.40 ± 0.717), significantly outperforming general dental trauma (3.97 ± 0.885) (P = 0.005). Intrusion received a rating of 4.13 ± 0.794, showing no significant difference compared to the other topics. Most evaluator scores fell into the “Good” (44.0%) and “Very Good” (38.7%) categories. This indicates a generally positive appraisal of ChatGPT’s performance, with a fair agreement among evaluators, evidenced by a combined Fleiss’s kappa coefficient of 0.324. However, there was variability, particularly with Evaluator 4’s scores differing significantly from those of evaluators 1 and 2.
Conclusions:
ChatGPT’s responses on general dental trauma, avulsion, and intrusion were generally rated positively, with avulsion responses deemed the most reliable. The study underscores the need for continuous evaluation to maintain the accuracy, reliability, and safety of AI-generated content in endodontics, suggesting AI should serve as a supplementary tool rather than a primary information source.
Q3

Agreement between students’ self/peer and faculty assessments of the radiographic technical quality of root canal treatment performed during preclinical and clinical endodontic courses
Awooda E.M., Elzaki W.M., Al-Nazhan S.A.
Abstract
Introduction:
This study investigated the agreement between students’ self-assessment or peer assessment and faculty assessment of the quality of root canal treatment (RCT) performed during preclinical and clinical endodontic courses.
Materials and Methods:
This cross-sectional study enrolled 23 4th-year students and a faculty member from the University of Medical Sciences and Technology, Sudan. The radiographic technical quality of RCTs performed during preclinical and clinical endodontic courses was evaluated by the students themselves, their peers, and faculty members in terms of the obturation length, shape, and density. Paired Student’s t-test was used to compare self-peer and faculty assessments. P < 0.05 was considered indicative of statistical significance.
Results:
No statistically significant differences were observed among the three assessment groups in terms of the quality of RCTs performed during the preclinical course. However, statistically significant differences were observed between self- and peer assessments (P = 0.014), and between self- and faculty assessments (P = 0.005), which may be attributable to lower confidence among students when working on real patients, leading to lower self-assessment scores.
Conclusion:
Significant differences were observed between self- and peer assessments and faculty assessments in the quality of RCT performed during the clinical course, with students underrating their performance. Formative assessment of learning rather than summative assessment, during endodontic courses, is recommended at the end of academic year.
Q3

Persistent pain in maxillary premolars following root canal treatment with apical transportation: A report of two cases without periapical pathology
Ong T.K.
Abstract
Persistent pain after endodontic treatment is often associated with evidence of periapical pathology. Nonetheless, this case report presents two instances of persistent pain in maxillary premolars post root canal treatment (RCT), without evident periapical radiolucency on imaging. A 35-year-old Asian female experienced dull, aching pain on biting in tooth #25, whereas a 40-year-old Caucasian female reported similar symptoms in tooth #15. Both teeth showed tenderness to percussion but not palpation. Periapical radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans revealed completed RCT with apical transportation but no detectable periapical pathology. Thus, both teeth were diagnosed as previously treated with symptomatic apical periodontitis. Non-surgical retreatment successfully addressed untreated canal spaces, resolving symptoms. This report suggested persistent pain following RCT might stem from endodontic reasons, even in the absence of visible apical pathology on CBCT scans, highlighting the importance of thorough canal debridement to resolve symptoms associated with untreated canal spaces in apical transportation. Furthermore, this case report demonstrates that clinicians should make a diagnosis through thorough dental history and other clinical investigations, without relying solely on CBCT for the diagnosis of posttreatment endodontic pain.
Q3

Tampon approach in vital pulp therapy: Advancing endodontic care for permanent dentition
Asgary S.
Q3
Saudi Endodontic Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
Q3

Comprehensive management of complex resorptive lesions: Report of two cases
Ray A.B., Mayya A., Ghosh S., Rai N., Acharya S.R., Chatra A., Shettigar L.S.
Abstract
In the field of endodontics, the management of complex resorptive lesions demands innovative and precise interventions. This report delineates the comprehensive management of two distinct cases, each presenting unique challenges. The first case involved a 23-year-old male with hypothyroidism, presenting with pain and external cervical resorption with internal communication in his lower left front tooth. The case was diagnosed with pulp necrosis and asymptomatic apical periodontitis. The second case involved a 26-year-old female in good health, dissatisfied with the cosmetic appearance, and experiencing occasional pain from a previously treated upper front tooth with concurrent external apical and internal resorption. It was diagnosed as previously treated, with symptomatic apical periodontitis. These cases were notable for their complexity and the tailored approach to diagnosis and treatment, employing advanced techniques and materials, such as bioceramic materials, for optimal outcomes. The first case was approached through conventional endodontic disinfection, flap reflection, and the meticulous external management of the resorptive defect with bioceramic material, followed by restorative procedures. The second case required retreatment, including wide canal management, apex negotiation, and the establishment of an apical plug with bioceramic material, culminating in backfilling with thermoplasticized gutta-percha and subsequent prosthetic rehabilitation. Remarkably, both cases demonstrated successful healing and patient satisfaction at a 6-month follow-up, with radiographs and photographs evidencing the desired clinical outcomes. This report highlights the necessity of adaptability, precision, and the integration of innovative materials and techniques in endodontic practice to effectively address complex resorptive lesions. It underscores the significance of a comprehensive diagnostic and treatment framework that can guide clinical decision-making and enhance procedural outcomes in similar challenging scenarios. It contributes valuable insights and reinforces the imperative of detailed management in endodontic complexities.
Q3

A narrative review on applications of nanotechnology in modern endodontics
Javed M.Q., Ali A.
Abstract
Nanotechnology in modern endodontics involves manipulating materials at the nanoscale to improve dental treatments, disinfection, imaging, and tissue engineering. This narrative review aims to evaluate the impact and applications of nanotechnology in modern endodontics, focusing on advancements in materials, disinfection processes, imaging techniques, and tissue engineering while addressing associated challenges and safety concerns. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in March 2024 across PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, COCHRANE Library, and Science Direct databases using MeSH terms/keywords such as “Nanotechnology,” “Endodontics,” “Disinfection,” and “Dental Tissue Engineering.” Articles published from March 2010 to March 2024 were considered, with inclusion criteria focusing on studies relevant to the objectives. From an initial pool of 774 articles, 86 were selected based on titles and abstracts, and 45 were shortlisted after full-text evaluation. The review highlights significant advancements in nanotechnology in endodontic materials, disinfection methods, imaging techniques, and tissue engineering. Nanomaterials have improved the efficiency, precision, and biocompatibility of dental treatments. However, challenges such as long-term biocompatibility, standardization of applications, and patient safety remain to be addressed. Continuous research, ethical practices, and regulatory oversight are crucial for integrating nanotechnology into endodontics. While nanotechnology offers promising advancements in endodontics, ongoing research and collaboration among researchers, clinicians, and regulatory bodies are essential to harness its full potential and ensure patient safety. Limitations of this review include potential biases in article selection and the evolving nature of nanotechnology research.
Q3

News
Q3
Saudi Endodontic Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
Q3

Evaluating the effectiveness of cone-beam computed tomography reverse contrast images in the diagnosis of vertical root fractures: An in vitro pilot study
Mortazavi S., Hasanpour S., Anbiaee N., Rouhani A., Naghavi N., Babazadeh S., Shiezadeh I.
Abstract
Introduction:
The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) reverse contrast images in the diagnosis of vertical root fractures (VRFs).
Materials and Methods:
In this study, 20 single-canal premolar teeth without cracks and internal resorption were selected and after root canal treatment, divided into two: experimental and control groups. In each of the teeth in the experimental group, an artificial fracture was created with the SANTAM device, then the teeth of both groups were randomly placed in the dental sockets of a dry mandible, and after preparing CBCT images of the teeth, the images were processed by reverse contrast software. Initial and reverse contrast images were examined by two radiologists and two endodontists. The data were analyzed by SPSS software version 22.
Results:
Observers reported higher sensitivity and positive and negative predictive value in normal contrast images than in reverse contrast images, but the specificity reported by endodontists in reverse contrast images was slightly higher than in normal contrast images. In comparing the results of radiologists and endodontists, there was a significant agreement in the review of the initial images (κ =0/59), but there was no significant agreement in the images with reverse contrast (κ = −0/1). There was not any notable distinction observed in the assessment of normal and reverse contrast images among the observers, nor in the comparison between radiologists and endodontists, except for the examination of normal contrast images by the two groups of radiologists and endodontists (P = 0.00). From this, it can be inferred that the diagnostic power of reverse contrast images in identifying VRFs is inferior to that of normal contrast images (P > 0.05).
Conclusion:
According to the obtained results, it was concluded that reverse contrast CBCT images are not effective in diagnosing VRFs and cause error in diagnosis.
Q3

Antibacterial activity and smear layer removal efficiency of silver nanoparticles as a final irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis using confocal laser scanning microscopy and scanning electron microscopy
Chandran N., Ramesh S.
Abstract
Introduction:
Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have garnered significant attention for their potent antibacterial properties, making them promising candidates for use as root canal irrigants in endodontics. The persistent presence of Enterococcus faecalis in treated root canals often leads to endodontic failures. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of neem-synthesized AgNPs, chemically synthesized AgNPs, sodium hypochlorite (2.25%), and saline solution in reducing viable bacteria and removing smear layers in E. faecalis-infected mandibular premolar teeth.
Materials and Methods:
After decoronation, mandibular premolar, single-rooted, teeth (120) were instrumented until ProTaper Gold F3. In all samples, inoculation of E. faecalis was done and divided into four groups depending on the irrigating solution used into Group A: neem-synthesized AgNPs, Group B: chemically synthesized AgNPs, Group C: sodium hypochlorite (2.25%), and Group D: saline solution. After irrigation, roots were divided longitudinally and analyzed for confocal laser scanning microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Data were statistically analyzed using Tukey’s honestly significant difference test.
Results:
The minimum reduction in live bacteria percentage was seen in Group C rather than Groups A and B; although there was no significant difference between them. Group D showed the maximum percentage of live bacteria and a greatest score of smear layer compared to other groups. In contrast to Group B, Group A scored higher, although the results were nonsignificant. Group C showed the least score of smear layer presence. The P value between the experimental groups was found to be <0.05, indicating statistical significance.
Conclusion:
Both neem-synthesized AgNp and sodium hypochlorite irrigants reduced the proportion of viable bacteria most significantly. This work demonstrates the possibility of employing nanoparticles as an irrigant that can effectively remove smear layers while also acting as an antimicrobial.
Q3

Endodontic management of mandibular permanent canine with two roots and two root canals using cone-beam computed tomography
Alfahadi H.R., Alyami Y.A., Alkazman F.H., Al Fadhil M.H., Alyami S.A., Alyami A.M., Alsalem M.F.
Abstract
A thorough understanding of the root canal systems of various human teeth can facilitate successful root canal treatment. The mandibular canines typically have one root and one canal. Mandibular canines with two roots are uncommon. This case report describes the examination of occlusion erosion and deep caries that had reached the pulp chamber in the mandibular canine of a 56-year-old healthy Saudi female patient referred to the endodontic clinic for evaluating the left mandibular canine. Radiographic evaluation revealed a widening of the periodontal ligament and periapical radiolucency and the presence of two roots. Two roots with two root canals were observed on cone-beam computed tomography. The tooth responded to a sensitivity test and was tender upon percussion and palpation. Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis and symptomatic apical periodontitis diagnosis were established, and nonsurgical root canal treatment was performed using a dental operating microscope. At follow-up, the patient’s symptoms had completely disappeared.
Q3

Use of bioactive glass in combination with or without calcium hydroxide changes the biological and mechanical properties of dentin: An in vitro study
Salkoska Yildizbas A., Uysal B.A., Kucuk Keles O., Belli S.
Abstract
Introduction:
Calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) is the most commonly used medicament in endodontics. This study aimed to investigate the effect of bioactive glass (BG) use with or without Ca(OH)2 on the biological and mechanical properties of dentin.
Materials and Methods:
Standard holes were created to simulate root canals on 84 dentin slices. Four groups were formed according to the medicament placed in the root canals: Ca(OH)2; Ca(OH)2 + 7% BG; BG and control. Scanning electron microscopy analysis to evaluate the dentin surfaces exposed to the test medicaments and energy dispersive X-ray analysis to observe apatite formation were used on the 1st, 7th, and 14th days. X-ray diffraction measurements were performed to investigate mineral phase formation. Microhardness and pH measurements were also carried out. Data were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (P < 0.05).
Results:
The Ca(OH)2 and control groups showed the highest Ca and P mineral content on the 14th day, whereas the lowest Ca and P content was found in the Ca(OH)2 + BG group (P < 0.05). A gradual decrease in crystal formation was found in the Ca(OH)2 + BG group from the 1st day to the 14th day. The highest microhardness measurements were also recorded in the Ca(OH)2 + BG group (P < 0.05). The Ca(OH)2 + BG group showed the highest pH measurements (P = 0.001).
Conclusions:
Ca(OH)2 + BG can be an alternative intracanal medicament. Further studies should be performed to determine the clinical implications of this combination.
Q3

Comparative evaluation of smear layer removal and dentin wettability using 1% phytic acid with and without 0.2% chitosan nanoparticles: An in vitro study
Halkai R., Halkai K.R., Mahveen S.U.
Abstract
Introduction:
The success of endodontic treatment depends on the complete removal of the smear layer from the root canal and the enhanced wettability of the irrigants employed during treatment. However, none of the irrigants efficiently accomplish this; thus, the purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the elimination of the smear layer and wettability of root dentin using the combination of 0.2% Chitosan nanoparticles(CSN) with 1% phytic acid (PA).
Materials and Methods:
About 100 extracted single-rooted human premolar teeth were decoronated and standardized to 13 mm root length. Fifty specimens were tested for smear layer removal and another half for wettability (n = 50) after final irrigation in five groups: Group 1 – normal saline (control), Group 2 – 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Group 3 – 17% EDTA with 0.2% CSN, Group 4 – 1% PA, and Group 5 – 1% PA with 0.2% CSN. After root canal instrumentation and final irrigation, the specimens were observed under scanning electron microscope for the smear layer. Wettability was determined using dentin blocks obtained (n = 50) by resecting the apical third of each specimen, treated with irrigants in aforementioned groups, and the contact angle was measured using a goniometer. Statistical analysis was done using one-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey tests (P < 0.05).
Results:
A combination of 1% PA with 0.2% CSN showed higher smear layer removal and increased wettability.
Conclusions:
The incorporation of 0.2% CSN to 1% PA was effective in removing the smear layer and increased the dentinal wettability.
Q3

A cross-sectional study on awareness regarding management of dental trauma among clinical dental students and interns
Ikhile F.O., Enabulele J.E.
Abstract
Introduction:
Dental trauma could lead to separation or crushing of the dental supporting tissues and esthetic and functional disorders. This study aims to evaluate the knowledge regarding the management of dental trauma among clinical dental students and interns in Benin City, Nigeria.
Materials and Methods:
This descriptive cross-sectional study utilized a self-administered questionnaire containing 15 closed and open-ended questions to garner data focused on sociodemograhic characteristics and awareness of the management of traumatic dental injury, from respondents. Data from 95 respondents were statistically analyzed and both univariate and bivariate analyses were used in this study.
Results:
A significant proportion; 77 (81.1%) had a poor overall knowledge of management, although most respondents had knowledge of some of the steps involved in emergency management of dental trauma. The association between respondents’ level of education and their knowledge of the management of dental trauma was found to be statistically significant (P = 0.0001). Respondents at higher level in their dental training were found to have better overall knowledge compared to those at lower levels.
Conclusion:
The knowledge regarding the management of dental trauma among the respondents was poor. This was associated with the level of study and clinical exposure.
Q3
Navigating endodontic outcomes through cone-beam computed tomography: A narrative review
Zahran S.S., Mirdad L.H.
Abstract
Periapical radiographs (PRs) have been the most reliable modality for assessing periapical health. Later, the evolution of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) revolutionized three-dimensional maxillofacial skeletal imaging. CBCT imaging has emerged as a superior diagnostic tool compared to PR. The aim of this narrative review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the outcomes related to the use of CBCT in evaluating various endodontic treatments, including primary root canal treatments, secondary treatments, endodontic microsurgeries, and vital pulp therapies and the associated prognostic factors. The research selection process involved systematically searching PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for literature on CBCT and endodontics. Criteria included English-language; peer-reviewed articles published from January 2010 to December 2023, reporting 1-year outcomes of various endodontic treatments using CBCT. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. A total of 18 outcome study articles utilizing CBCT to evaluate primary root canal treatment were selected, as well as 7 for secondary root canal retreatment, 3 for vital pulp therapy, and 11 articles pertaining to endodontic microsurgery. The outcomes revealed varying success rates and prognostic factors. Consistent with outcome research employing PRs, studies that utilized CBCT also exhibited substantial variability in factors affecting initial and secondary treatment outcomes. The rate of favorable outcomes was significantly lower when assessed with CBCT compared to PR. The results from utilizing CBCT for primary and secondary root canal treatments, endodontic microsurgeries, and vital pulp therapies demonstrate diverse success rates and prognostic factors in comparison to outcomes based solely on PRs.
Top-100
Citing journals
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
|
|
Journal of the American Heart Association
6811 citations, 2.84%
|
|
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
4613 citations, 1.92%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
3533 citations, 1.47%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
3170 citations, 1.32%
|
|
Scientific Reports
2834 citations, 1.18%
|
|
Circulation
2706 citations, 1.13%
|
|
PLoS ONE
2133 citations, 0.89%
|
|
International Journal of Cardiology
2076 citations, 0.87%
|
|
American Journal of Cardiology
1777 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Nutrients
1725 citations, 0.72%
|
|
European Heart Journal
1576 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Frontiers in Physiology
1169 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Cureus
1141 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Circulation Research
1098 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Hypertension
1089 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Stroke
1036 citations, 0.43%
|
|
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
1035 citations, 0.43%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
981 citations, 0.41%
|
|
ESC heart failure
897 citations, 0.37%
|
|
BMJ Open
887 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Frontiers in Pharmacology
883 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Current Cardiology Reports
865 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Atherosclerosis
837 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Biomedicines
833 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Europace
831 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
805 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Frontiers in Neurology
791 citations, 0.33%
|
|
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
780 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Cells
760 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Heart Rhythm
759 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
747 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Resuscitation
738 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Cardiovascular Diabetology
725 citations, 0.3%
|
|
American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology
722 citations, 0.3%
|
|
American Heart Journal
721 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
714 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Hypertension
712 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Circulation Journal
707 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Medicine (United States)
702 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Cardiovascular Research
693 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Heart
673 citations, 0.28%
|
|
European Journal of Heart Failure
663 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
647 citations, 0.27%
|
|
JAMA network open
629 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Frontiers in Endocrinology
629 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Diagnostics
620 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Frontiers in Immunology
613 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Current Problems in Cardiology
585 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Hypertension Research
582 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
573 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Nature Reviews Cardiology
536 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
533 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
525 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Heart Failure Reviews
515 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
491 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Clinical Cardiology
478 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Pediatric Cardiology
474 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
471 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Cardiology in the Young
466 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
459 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Vascular Surgery
454 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
442 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Biomolecules
440 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Cardiology
437 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Antioxidants
436 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
434 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Cardiac Failure
433 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Current Atherosclerosis Reports
426 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Circulation: Heart Failure
421 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy
415 citations, 0.17%
|
|
IJC Heart and Vasculature
412 citations, 0.17%
|
|
BMC Public Health
407 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Medicina
399 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Life
399 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Cardiology
390 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
387 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Current Opinion in Cardiology
386 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Hypertension
371 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy
367 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Frontiers in Medicine
366 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Clinical Research in Cardiology
365 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
355 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
354 citations, 0.15%
|
|
American Journal of Hypertension
353 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Heart and Vessels
350 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
347 citations, 0.14%
|
|
European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging
347 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Frontiers in Nutrition
341 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Open Heart
333 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Annals of Vascular Surgery
332 citations, 0.14%
|
|
JAMA Cardiology
330 citations, 0.14%
|
|
European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery
329 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Lipidology
328 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Neurology
322 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Current Hypertension Reports
321 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Personalized Medicine
320 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
318 citations, 0.13%
|
|
PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
316 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
313 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Life Sciences
312 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
|
Citing publishers
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
|
|
Elsevier
50563 citations, 21.1%
|
|
Springer Nature
38148 citations, 15.92%
|
|
Wiley
23142 citations, 9.65%
|
|
MDPI
19515 citations, 8.14%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
19161 citations, 7.99%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
13000 citations, 5.42%
|
|
Oxford University Press
8941 citations, 3.73%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
6821 citations, 2.85%
|
|
SAGE
6054 citations, 2.53%
|
|
BMJ
3986 citations, 1.66%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
3704 citations, 1.55%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2568 citations, 1.07%
|
|
American Physiological Society
1882 citations, 0.79%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
1868 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
1747 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
1297 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
1272 citations, 0.53%
|
|
JMIR Publications
1049 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
1017 citations, 0.42%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
952 citations, 0.4%
|
|
The Japanese Circulation Society
930 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
872 citations, 0.36%
|
|
S. Karger AG
773 citations, 0.32%
|
|
The Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology
768 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
639 citations, 0.27%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
630 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Radcliffe Media Media Ltd
561 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
535 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
497 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Silicea - Poligraf, LLC
478 citations, 0.2%
|
|
The Endocrine Society
477 citations, 0.2%
|
|
American Society for Nutrition
440 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
431 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Nippon-Shinzobyo-Gakkai/Japanese College of Cardiology
397 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
389 citations, 0.16%
|
|
American Society for Clinical Investigation
376 citations, 0.16%
|
|
American Diabetes Association
373 citations, 0.16%
|
|
IntechOpen
361 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
352 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Japan Atherosclerosis Society
334 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Portland Press
329 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Impact Journals
303 citations, 0.13%
|
|
IOS Press
295 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Medknow
284 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Media Sphere Publishing House
248 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Annual Reviews
236 citations, 0.1%
|
|
OAE Publishing Inc.
229 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Massachusetts Medical Society
227 citations, 0.09%
|
|
European Respiratory Society (ERS)
224 citations, 0.09%
|
|
International Heart Journal (Japanese Heart Journal)
224 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Society of Nephrology
217 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Europa Ed
217 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB)
215 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Thoracic Society
212 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Society of Echocardiography
211 citations, 0.09%
|
|
XMLink
205 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Hans Publishers
201 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
198 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
196 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
184 citations, 0.08%
|
|
APO Society of Specialists in Heart Failure
184 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
183 citations, 0.08%
|
|
IOP Publishing
179 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
178 citations, 0.07%
|
|
176 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)
175 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Edizioni Minerva Medica
174 citations, 0.07%
|
|
F1000 Research
174 citations, 0.07%
|
|
SciELO
172 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
151 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
151 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
141 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Society of Hematology
140 citations, 0.06%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
140 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American College of Physicians
129 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
129 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Eco-Vector LLC
128 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Sociedade Portuguesa De Cardiologia
126 citations, 0.05%
|
|
PeerJ
123 citations, 0.05%
|
|
120 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Association for Clinical Chemistry
114 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Human Kinetics
111 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Korean Stroke Society
103 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Silicea - Poligraf
101 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Remedium, Ltd.
99 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Netherlands Society of Cardiology
99 citations, 0.04%
|
|
PAGEPress Publications
96 citations, 0.04%
|
|
AIP Publishing
95 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
94 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Bioscientifica
94 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Rockefeller University Press
93 citations, 0.04%
|
|
NII KPSSZ
91 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Korean Society of Cardiology
91 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
90 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IMR Press
89 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Arterialnaya Gipertenziya
86 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Intermedservice Ltd
86 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
84 citations, 0.04%
|
|
China Science Publishing & Media
83 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Environmental Health Perspectives
83 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
|
Publishing organizations
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
|
Harvard University
858 publications, 8.25%
|
|
Brigham and Women's Hospital
527 publications, 5.07%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
494 publications, 4.75%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
391 publications, 3.76%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
384 publications, 3.69%
|
|
Northwestern University
308 publications, 2.96%
|
|
Stanford University
305 publications, 2.93%
|
|
Emory University
296 publications, 2.85%
|
|
University of Washington
270 publications, 2.6%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
264 publications, 2.54%
|
|
University of Toronto
257 publications, 2.47%
|
|
University of Minnesota
253 publications, 2.43%
|
|
Boston University
252 publications, 2.42%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
243 publications, 2.34%
|
|
Yale University
239 publications, 2.3%
|
|
Cleveland Clinic
222 publications, 2.13%
|
|
University of Michigan
214 publications, 2.06%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
212 publications, 2.04%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
206 publications, 1.98%
|
|
Columbia University
203 publications, 1.95%
|
|
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
202 publications, 1.94%
|
|
Baylor College of Medicine
195 publications, 1.87%
|
|
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
192 publications, 1.85%
|
|
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
184 publications, 1.77%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
179 publications, 1.72%
|
|
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
176 publications, 1.69%
|
|
Duke University
171 publications, 1.64%
|
|
Wake Forest University
169 publications, 1.62%
|
|
Imperial College London
166 publications, 1.6%
|
|
Cornell University
164 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Duke University Hospital
161 publications, 1.55%
|
|
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
158 publications, 1.52%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
151 publications, 1.45%
|
|
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
146 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
145 publications, 1.39%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
143 publications, 1.37%
|
|
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research
139 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Capital Medical University
135 publications, 1.3%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
135 publications, 1.3%
|
|
University of Alberta
132 publications, 1.27%
|
|
Amsterdam University Medical Center
128 publications, 1.23%
|
|
University of Florida
126 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
124 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
115 publications, 1.11%
|
|
Brown University
114 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Sydney
112 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University College London
111 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Boston Children's Hospital
110 publications, 1.06%
|
|
University of Oxford
109 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Copenhagen University Hospital
106 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Utah
105 publications, 1.01%
|
|
New York University
102 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Uppsala University
99 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
98 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Cincinnati
97 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Monash University
95 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
94 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
92 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Yale New Haven Hospital
91 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
91 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University Medical Center Utrecht
91 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Missouri–Kansas City
90 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Calgary
90 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University Hospital of Bern
89 publications, 0.86%
|
|
National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
88 publications, 0.85%
|
|
University of Ottawa
88 publications, 0.85%
|
|
University of Chicago
87 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Sungkyunkwan University
85 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Houston Methodist Hospital
85 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Karolinska University Hospital
84 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of New South Wales
84 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Aarhus University Hospital
84 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Glasgow
84 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Cambridge
83 publications, 0.8%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore
82 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of Southern California
81 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Ohio State University
81 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
81 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University Medical Center Groningen
80 publications, 0.77%
|
|
McMaster University
79 publications, 0.76%
|
|
Yonsei University
77 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
76 publications, 0.73%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
75 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Miami
75 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Seoul National University Hospital
74 publications, 0.71%
|
|
University of Arizona
74 publications, 0.71%
|
|
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
74 publications, 0.71%
|
|
Tulane University
73 publications, 0.7%
|
|
King's College London
72 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Melbourne
72 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Aarhus University
71 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Paris Cité University
71 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
71 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Tufts Medical Center
70 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of British Columbia
70 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Samsung Medical Center
68 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Erasmus University Medical Center
68 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Lund University
67 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Aalborg University
67 publications, 0.64%
|
|
NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
67 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
|
|
Harvard University
427 publications, 7.41%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
276 publications, 4.79%
|
|
Brigham and Women's Hospital
245 publications, 4.25%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
209 publications, 3.63%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
208 publications, 3.61%
|
|
Northwestern University
171 publications, 2.97%
|
|
Stanford University
168 publications, 2.92%
|
|
Emory University
158 publications, 2.74%
|
|
Yale University
156 publications, 2.71%
|
|
University of Washington
146 publications, 2.54%
|
|
University of Toronto
146 publications, 2.54%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
143 publications, 2.48%
|
|
University of Michigan
137 publications, 2.38%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
132 publications, 2.29%
|
|
University of Minnesota
129 publications, 2.24%
|
|
Cleveland Clinic
129 publications, 2.24%
|
|
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
123 publications, 2.14%
|
|
Boston University
115 publications, 2%
|
|
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
115 publications, 2%
|
|
Baylor College of Medicine
114 publications, 1.98%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
113 publications, 1.96%
|
|
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
113 publications, 1.96%
|
|
Duke University
108 publications, 1.88%
|
|
Columbia University
103 publications, 1.79%
|
|
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
103 publications, 1.79%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
101 publications, 1.75%
|
|
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
96 publications, 1.67%
|
|
Imperial College London
94 publications, 1.63%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
92 publications, 1.6%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
90 publications, 1.56%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
90 publications, 1.56%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
88 publications, 1.53%
|
|
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research
87 publications, 1.51%
|
|
Cornell University
83 publications, 1.44%
|
|
Amsterdam University Medical Center
81 publications, 1.41%
|
|
Capital Medical University
80 publications, 1.39%
|
|
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
80 publications, 1.39%
|
|
Copenhagen University Hospital
77 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Wake Forest University
76 publications, 1.32%
|
|
University of Alberta
73 publications, 1.27%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
72 publications, 1.25%
|
|
Duke University Hospital
68 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University Hospital of Bern
67 publications, 1.16%
|
|
University of Utah
67 publications, 1.16%
|
|
University of Florida
66 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Boston Children's Hospital
65 publications, 1.13%
|
|
Houston Methodist Hospital
65 publications, 1.13%
|
|
University of Cincinnati
65 publications, 1.13%
|
|
University College London
63 publications, 1.09%
|
|
University of Sydney
63 publications, 1.09%
|
|
New York University
62 publications, 1.08%
|
|
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
62 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Brown University
61 publications, 1.06%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
59 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
58 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
58 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Uppsala University
57 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Aarhus University Hospital
57 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Sungkyunkwan University
57 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Yonsei University
56 publications, 0.97%
|
|
University Medical Center Utrecht
56 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Monash University
55 publications, 0.96%
|
|
University of Oxford
54 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
53 publications, 0.92%
|
|
University of Chicago
52 publications, 0.9%
|
|
University Medical Center Groningen
52 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Aarhus University
51 publications, 0.89%
|
|
National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
51 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
51 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
51 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University of New South Wales
50 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
50 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of British Columbia
50 publications, 0.87%
|
|
McMaster University
50 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Glasgow
47 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Seoul National University Hospital
47 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Samsung Medical Center
47 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Ohio State University
47 publications, 0.82%
|
|
University of Calgary
47 publications, 0.82%
|
|
University of Ottawa
47 publications, 0.82%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
46 publications, 0.8%
|
|
University of Southern California
45 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Yale New Haven Hospital
45 publications, 0.78%
|
|
NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
45 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University of Cambridge
44 publications, 0.76%
|
|
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
44 publications, 0.76%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
43 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Tulane University
43 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
42 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Erasmus University Medical Center
42 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Karolinska University Hospital
41 publications, 0.71%
|
|
Tufts Medical Center
41 publications, 0.71%
|
|
University of Arizona
41 publications, 0.71%
|
|
Leiden University Medical Center
41 publications, 0.71%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore
41 publications, 0.71%
|
|
Aalborg University
40 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Melbourne
40 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Ulsan
40 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Missouri–Kansas City
40 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Osaka University
40 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
|
Publishing countries
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
|
|
USA
|
USA, 5826, 56.01%
USA
5826 publications, 56.01%
|
China
|
China, 1269, 12.2%
China
1269 publications, 12.2%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 1072, 10.31%
United Kingdom
1072 publications, 10.31%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 833, 8.01%
Canada
833 publications, 8.01%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 725, 6.97%
Japan
725 publications, 6.97%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 601, 5.78%
Germany
601 publications, 5.78%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 572, 5.5%
Italy
572 publications, 5.5%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 507, 4.87%
Netherlands
507 publications, 4.87%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 490, 4.71%
Australia
490 publications, 4.71%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 438, 4.21%
Republic of Korea
438 publications, 4.21%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 369, 3.55%
Sweden
369 publications, 3.55%
|
France
|
France, 343, 3.3%
France
343 publications, 3.3%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 337, 3.24%
Denmark
337 publications, 3.24%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 239, 2.3%
Spain
239 publications, 2.3%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 236, 2.27%
Switzerland
236 publications, 2.27%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 142, 1.37%
Norway
142 publications, 1.37%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 139, 1.34%
Belgium
139 publications, 1.34%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 124, 1.19%
Finland
124 publications, 1.19%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 118, 1.13%
Brazil
118 publications, 1.13%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 118, 1.13%
Israel
118 publications, 1.13%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 106, 1.02%
Austria
106 publications, 1.02%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 101, 0.97%
Singapore
101 publications, 0.97%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 75, 0.72%
New Zealand
75 publications, 0.72%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 69, 0.66%
Poland
69 publications, 0.66%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 66, 0.63%
Turkey
66 publications, 0.63%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 63, 0.61%
Greece
63 publications, 0.61%
|
India
|
India, 51, 0.49%
India
51 publications, 0.49%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 51, 0.49%
Ireland
51 publications, 0.49%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 45, 0.43%
Czech Republic
45 publications, 0.43%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 44, 0.42%
Lebanon
44 publications, 0.42%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 37, 0.36%
Saudi Arabia
37 publications, 0.36%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 35, 0.34%
Hungary
35 publications, 0.34%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 34, 0.33%
Portugal
34 publications, 0.33%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 33, 0.32%
Russia
33 publications, 0.32%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 33, 0.32%
Argentina
33 publications, 0.32%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 29, 0.28%
Thailand
29 publications, 0.28%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 27, 0.26%
South Africa
27 publications, 0.26%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 26, 0.25%
Iran
26 publications, 0.25%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 25, 0.24%
Chile
25 publications, 0.24%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 24, 0.23%
Mexico
24 publications, 0.23%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 20, 0.19%
Qatar
20 publications, 0.19%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 18, 0.17%
Malaysia
18 publications, 0.17%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 15, 0.14%
UAE
15 publications, 0.14%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 15, 0.14%
Serbia
15 publications, 0.14%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 14, 0.13%
Iceland
14 publications, 0.13%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 13, 0.12%
Pakistan
13 publications, 0.12%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 12, 0.12%
Ghana
12 publications, 0.12%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 12, 0.12%
Egypt
12 publications, 0.12%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 12, 0.12%
Colombia
12 publications, 0.12%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 12, 0.12%
Peru
12 publications, 0.12%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 11, 0.11%
Romania
11 publications, 0.11%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 10, 0.1%
Georgia
10 publications, 0.1%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 10, 0.1%
Indonesia
10 publications, 0.1%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 10, 0.1%
Cyprus
10 publications, 0.1%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 10, 0.1%
Nigeria
10 publications, 0.1%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 9, 0.09%
Vietnam
9 publications, 0.09%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 9, 0.09%
Kenya
9 publications, 0.09%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 8, 0.08%
Slovenia
8 publications, 0.08%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 8, 0.08%
Uganda
8 publications, 0.08%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 7, 0.07%
Ukraine
7 publications, 0.07%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 7, 0.07%
Estonia
7 publications, 0.07%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 7, 0.07%
Lithuania
7 publications, 0.07%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 7, 0.07%
North Macedonia
7 publications, 0.07%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 7, 0.07%
Croatia
7 publications, 0.07%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 6, 0.06%
Slovakia
6 publications, 0.06%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 5, 0.05%
Bangladesh
5 publications, 0.05%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 5, 0.05%
Bulgaria
5 publications, 0.05%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 5, 0.05%
Kuwait
5 publications, 0.05%
|
Barbados
|
Barbados, 4, 0.04%
Barbados
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 4, 0.04%
Luxembourg
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 4, 0.04%
Puerto Rico
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 4, 0.04%
Tanzania
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 4, 0.04%
Ecuador
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 3, 0.03%
Jordan
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 3, 0.03%
Latvia
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Monaco
|
Monaco, 3, 0.03%
Monaco
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Palestine
|
Palestine, 3, 0.03%
Palestine
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 3, 0.03%
Tunisia
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 3, 0.03%
Uruguay
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Burkina Faso
|
Burkina Faso, 2, 0.02%
Burkina Faso
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 2, 0.02%
Venezuela
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 2, 0.02%
Zambia
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 2, 0.02%
Costa Rica
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
Côte d'Ivoire, 2, 0.02%
Côte d'Ivoire
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 2, 0.02%
Cuba
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 2, 0.02%
Oman
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Paraguay
|
Paraguay, 2, 0.02%
Paraguay
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 2, 0.02%
Sri Lanka
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.01%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Albania
|
Albania, 1, 0.01%
Albania
1 publication, 0.01%
|
American Samoa
|
American Samoa, 1, 0.01%
American Samoa
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Angola
|
Angola, 1, 0.01%
Angola
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 1, 0.01%
Armenia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 1, 0.01%
Bahrain
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1, 0.01%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 1, 0.01%
Botswana
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Bhutan
|
Bhutan, 1, 0.01%
Bhutan
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Guyana
|
Guyana, 1, 0.01%
Guyana
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Guatemala
|
Guatemala, 1, 0.01%
Guatemala
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Grenada
|
Grenada, 1, 0.01%
Grenada
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
|
|
USA
|
USA, 3107, 53.95%
USA
3107 publications, 53.95%
|
China
|
China, 741, 12.87%
China
741 publications, 12.87%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 571, 9.91%
United Kingdom
571 publications, 9.91%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 452, 7.85%
Canada
452 publications, 7.85%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 406, 7.05%
Japan
406 publications, 7.05%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 332, 5.76%
Germany
332 publications, 5.76%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 305, 5.3%
Italy
305 publications, 5.3%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 288, 5%
Netherlands
288 publications, 5%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 272, 4.72%
Republic of Korea
272 publications, 4.72%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 253, 4.39%
Australia
253 publications, 4.39%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 217, 3.77%
Denmark
217 publications, 3.77%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 193, 3.35%
Sweden
193 publications, 3.35%
|
France
|
France, 177, 3.07%
France
177 publications, 3.07%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 158, 2.74%
Switzerland
158 publications, 2.74%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 129, 2.24%
Spain
129 publications, 2.24%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 77, 1.34%
Belgium
77 publications, 1.34%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 72, 1.25%
Norway
72 publications, 1.25%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 67, 1.16%
Israel
67 publications, 1.16%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 62, 1.08%
Singapore
62 publications, 1.08%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 62, 1.08%
Finland
62 publications, 1.08%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 60, 1.04%
Austria
60 publications, 1.04%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 55, 0.96%
Brazil
55 publications, 0.96%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 39, 0.68%
Ireland
39 publications, 0.68%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 37, 0.64%
Poland
37 publications, 0.64%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 36, 0.63%
New Zealand
36 publications, 0.63%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 35, 0.61%
Greece
35 publications, 0.61%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 35, 0.61%
Turkey
35 publications, 0.61%
|
India
|
India, 32, 0.56%
India
32 publications, 0.56%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 25, 0.43%
Saudi Arabia
25 publications, 0.43%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 22, 0.38%
Portugal
22 publications, 0.38%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 22, 0.38%
Lebanon
22 publications, 0.38%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 21, 0.36%
Czech Republic
21 publications, 0.36%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 20, 0.35%
Argentina
20 publications, 0.35%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 19, 0.33%
South Africa
19 publications, 0.33%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 18, 0.31%
Russia
18 publications, 0.31%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 18, 0.31%
Iran
18 publications, 0.31%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 18, 0.31%
Thailand
18 publications, 0.31%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 15, 0.26%
Malaysia
15 publications, 0.26%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 14, 0.24%
Hungary
14 publications, 0.24%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 13, 0.23%
Qatar
13 publications, 0.23%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 13, 0.23%
Mexico
13 publications, 0.23%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 11, 0.19%
Egypt
11 publications, 0.19%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 11, 0.19%
Pakistan
11 publications, 0.19%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 10, 0.17%
Chile
10 publications, 0.17%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 9, 0.16%
Ghana
9 publications, 0.16%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 9, 0.16%
Serbia
9 publications, 0.16%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 8, 0.14%
Colombia
8 publications, 0.14%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 8, 0.14%
Uganda
8 publications, 0.14%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 7, 0.12%
Vietnam
7 publications, 0.12%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 7, 0.12%
Cyprus
7 publications, 0.12%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 7, 0.12%
Nigeria
7 publications, 0.12%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 7, 0.12%
UAE
7 publications, 0.12%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 6, 0.1%
Romania
6 publications, 0.1%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 5, 0.09%
Indonesia
5 publications, 0.09%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 5, 0.09%
Iceland
5 publications, 0.09%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 5, 0.09%
Lithuania
5 publications, 0.09%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 5, 0.09%
Peru
5 publications, 0.09%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 5, 0.09%
Slovenia
5 publications, 0.09%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 4, 0.07%
Ukraine
4 publications, 0.07%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 4, 0.07%
Bulgaria
4 publications, 0.07%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 4, 0.07%
Georgia
4 publications, 0.07%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 4, 0.07%
Kenya
4 publications, 0.07%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 4, 0.07%
Slovakia
4 publications, 0.07%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 4, 0.07%
Tanzania
4 publications, 0.07%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 3, 0.05%
Estonia
3 publications, 0.05%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 3, 0.05%
Kuwait
3 publications, 0.05%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 3, 0.05%
Luxembourg
3 publications, 0.05%
|
Monaco
|
Monaco, 3, 0.05%
Monaco
3 publications, 0.05%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 3, 0.05%
Puerto Rico
3 publications, 0.05%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 3, 0.05%
Croatia
3 publications, 0.05%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 2, 0.03%
Bangladesh
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Barbados
|
Barbados, 2, 0.03%
Barbados
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 2, 0.03%
Zambia
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 2, 0.03%
Jordan
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
Côte d'Ivoire, 2, 0.03%
Côte d'Ivoire
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 2, 0.03%
Cuba
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 2, 0.03%
Latvia
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Paraguay
|
Paraguay, 2, 0.03%
Paraguay
2 publications, 0.03%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 2, 0.03%
North Macedonia
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 2, 0.03%
Uruguay
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 2, 0.03%
Sri Lanka
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 2, 0.03%
Ecuador
2 publications, 0.03%
|
American Samoa
|
American Samoa, 1, 0.02%
American Samoa
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 1, 0.02%
Armenia
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Burkina Faso
|
Burkina Faso, 1, 0.02%
Burkina Faso
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Bhutan
|
Bhutan, 1, 0.02%
Bhutan
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 1, 0.02%
Venezuela
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Guatemala
|
Guatemala, 1, 0.02%
Guatemala
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Grenada
|
Grenada, 1, 0.02%
Grenada
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.02%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 1, 0.02%
Cameroon
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 1, 0.02%
Costa Rica
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 1, 0.02%
Malawi
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 1, 0.02%
Malta
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Mozambique
|
Mozambique, 1, 0.02%
Mozambique
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 1, 0.02%
Mongolia
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Namibia
|
Namibia, 1, 0.02%
Namibia
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 1, 0.02%
Nepal
1 publication, 0.02%
|
New Caledonia
|
New Caledonia, 1, 0.02%
New Caledonia
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Cayman Islands
|
Cayman Islands, 1, 0.02%
Cayman Islands
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
|
4 profile journal articles
Ding Ding

University of Sydney
278 publications,
12 430 citations
h-index: 48
3 profile journal articles
Lam Cindy
Professor

University of Hong Kong
304 publications,
7 127 citations
h-index: 42
2 profile journal articles
Shechter Alon

Tel Aviv University

Rabin Medical Center
55 publications,
574 citations
h-index: 8
2 profile journal articles
UCHIDA KEIJI
22 publications,
19 citations
h-index: 2
2 profile journal articles
Velarde Gladys
🤝
University of Florida
30 publications,
341 citations
h-index: 7
2 profile journal articles
Wildi Karin
48 publications,
476 citations
h-index: 11
2 profile journal articles
ARBELO ELENA
🥼
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
250 publications,
35 174 citations
h-index: 55
2 profile journal articles
Ferreira Isabel
PhD in Health sciences, Professor
130 publications,
10 436 citations
h-index: 48
Research interests
Epidemiology
1 profile journal article
Maria Rosa
212 publications,
7 805 citations
h-index: 40
1 profile journal article
Ho‐Tin‐Noé Benoit
92 publications,
3 971 citations
h-index: 33
1 profile journal article
Bram Van
146 publications,
5 059 citations
h-index: 34
1 profile journal article
Chattopadhyay Ishanu
68 publications,
477 citations
h-index: 14
1 profile journal article
Juul Jens
1 741 publications,
110 690 citations
h-index: 161
1 profile journal article
Shendre Aditi
29 publications,
573 citations
h-index: 15