volume 16 issue 3 pages 307-331

Reliability in Coding Open-Ended Data: Lessons Learned from HIV Behavioral Research

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2004-08-01
scimago Q1
wos Q2
SJR0.498
CiteScore2.5
Impact factor1.4
ISSN1525822X, 15523969
Anthropology
Abstract

Analysis of text from open-ended interviews has become an important research tool in numerous fields, including business, education, and health research. Coding is an essential part of such analysis, but questions of quality control in the coding process have generally received little attention. This article examines the text coding process applied to three HIV-related studies conducted with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention considering populations in the United States and Zimbabwe. Based on experience coding data from these studies, we conclude that (1) a team of coders will initially produce very different codings, but (2) it is possible, through a process of codebook revision and recoding, to establish strong levels of intercoder reliability (e.g., most codes with kappa 0.8). Furthermore, steps can be taken to improve initially poor intercoder reliability and to reduce the number of iterations required to generate stronger intercoder reliability.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PLoS ONE
8 publications, 1.42%
Archives of Sexual Behavior
6 publications, 1.07%
AIDS and Behavior
6 publications, 1.07%
SSRN Electronic Journal
6 publications, 1.07%
AIDS Education and Prevention
5 publications, 0.89%
Field Methods
4 publications, 0.71%
Sustainability
4 publications, 0.71%
Children and Youth Services Review
4 publications, 0.71%
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
4 publications, 0.71%
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology
4 publications, 0.71%
BMC Medical Ethics
3 publications, 0.53%
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
3 publications, 0.53%
AIDS Patient Care and STDs
3 publications, 0.53%
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
3 publications, 0.53%
Health Promotion Practice
3 publications, 0.53%
Educational Policy
3 publications, 0.53%
Teaching of Psychology
3 publications, 0.53%
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
3 publications, 0.53%
Supportive Care in Cancer
3 publications, 0.53%
BMC Public Health
3 publications, 0.53%
Implementation Science
3 publications, 0.53%
Teaching and Teacher Education
3 publications, 0.53%
Women's Health Issues
3 publications, 0.53%
Journal of Cleaner Production
3 publications, 0.53%
Child Abuse and Neglect
3 publications, 0.53%
Journal of Business Research
3 publications, 0.53%
Safety Science
3 publications, 0.53%
Journal of Health Communication
3 publications, 0.53%
Journal of Homosexuality
3 publications, 0.53%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Publishers

10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Taylor & Francis
89 publications, 15.81%
Springer Nature
87 publications, 15.45%
Elsevier
78 publications, 13.85%
SAGE
71 publications, 12.61%
Wiley
39 publications, 6.93%
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
31 publications, 5.51%
Emerald
19 publications, 3.37%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
12 publications, 2.13%
MDPI
10 publications, 1.78%
Oxford University Press
10 publications, 1.78%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
8 publications, 1.42%
IGI Global
8 publications, 1.42%
JMIR Publications
7 publications, 1.24%
Mary Ann Liebert
7 publications, 1.24%
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
7 publications, 1.24%
American Psychological Association (APA)
6 publications, 1.07%
Guilford Publications
5 publications, 0.89%
BMJ
4 publications, 0.71%
Frontiers Media S.A.
3 publications, 0.53%
IOP Publishing
3 publications, 0.53%
Social Science Electronic Publishing
3 publications, 0.53%
Cambridge University Press
3 publications, 0.53%
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
2 publications, 0.36%
Human Kinetics
2 publications, 0.36%
PeerJ
2 publications, 0.36%
American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB)
2 publications, 0.36%
University of Chicago Press
2 publications, 0.36%
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
1 publication, 0.18%
University Pub. Group
1 publication, 0.18%
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
563
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Hruschka D. J. et al. Reliability in Coding Open-Ended Data: Lessons Learned from HIV Behavioral Research // Field Methods. 2004. Vol. 16. No. 3. pp. 307-331.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Hruschka D. J., Schwartz D., St John D. C., Picone Decaro E., Jenkins R. A., Carey J. W. Reliability in Coding Open-Ended Data: Lessons Learned from HIV Behavioral Research // Field Methods. 2004. Vol. 16. No. 3. pp. 307-331.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1177/1525822x04266540
UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x04266540
TI - Reliability in Coding Open-Ended Data: Lessons Learned from HIV Behavioral Research
T2 - Field Methods
AU - Hruschka, Daniel J.
AU - Schwartz, Deborah
AU - St John, Daphne Cobb
AU - Picone Decaro, Erin
AU - Jenkins, Richard A.
AU - Carey, James W.
PY - 2004
DA - 2004/08/01
PB - SAGE
SP - 307-331
IS - 3
VL - 16
SN - 1525-822X
SN - 1552-3969
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2004_Hruschka,
author = {Daniel J. Hruschka and Deborah Schwartz and Daphne Cobb St John and Erin Picone Decaro and Richard A. Jenkins and James W. Carey},
title = {Reliability in Coding Open-Ended Data: Lessons Learned from HIV Behavioral Research},
journal = {Field Methods},
year = {2004},
volume = {16},
publisher = {SAGE},
month = {aug},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x04266540},
number = {3},
pages = {307--331},
doi = {10.1177/1525822x04266540}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Hruschka, Daniel J., et al. “Reliability in Coding Open-Ended Data: Lessons Learned from HIV Behavioral Research.” Field Methods, vol. 16, no. 3, Aug. 2004, pp. 307-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x04266540.