AIDS Education and Prevention
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
WOS
Q3
Impact factor
1.6
SJR
0.632
CiteScore
2.2
Categories
Health (social science)
Infectious Diseases
Medicine (miscellaneous)
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Areas
Medicine
Social Sciences
Years of issue
1989-2024
journal names
AIDS Education and Prevention
AIDS EDUC PREV
Top-3 citing journals

AIDS and Behavior
(2511 citations)

AIDS Care - Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of AIDS/HIV
(1112 citations)
AIDS Education and Prevention
(897 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Johns Hopkins University
(32 publications)

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
(27 publications)

Columbia University
(25 publications)

Columbia University
(18 publications)

Johns Hopkins University
(17 publications)

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
(13 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 337
Q2

Study on dynamic response of cushion layer-reinforced concrete slab under rockfall impact based on smoothed particle hydrodynamics and finite-element method coupling
Mei X., Wu J., Wang T., Wang T., Liang X., Wang Y., Li B., Su T., Xu L.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
In the rockfall prevention and control project, the reinforced concrete (RC) slab and sand (gravel soil) soil cushion layer are commonly used to form the protection structure, thereby resisting the rockfall impact. Considering that the oversized deformation of the cushion layer under impact load using the finite element simulation cannot converge, this article establishes a numerical calculation model using smoothed particle hydrodynamics–finite-element method coupling (SPH–FEM). First, the standard Lagrange finite-element mesh is established for the whole model using ABAQUS, and then the finite-element mesh of the soil cushion layer is converted to SPH particle at the initial moment of the calculation, and finally the calculation results are solved and outputted. The results indicate that, compared with the results of the outdoor rockfall impact test, the relative errors of the rockfall impact force and the displacement of the RC slab are within 10%, which proves the rationality of the coupling algorithm; moreover, in terms of the numerical simulation, the SPH–FEM coupling algorithm is more practical than the finite element for reproducing the mobility of the rockfall impacting the sand and soil particles. In addition, at an impact speed of less than 12 m·s−1, the cushion layer is able to absorb more than 85% of the impact energy, which effectively ensures that the RC slab is in an elastic working state under small impact energy and does not undergo destructive damage under large impact energy; the peak impact force of the rockfall is approximately linear with the velocity, and the simulated value of the peak impact force is basically the same as that of the theoretical value of Hertz theory; the numerical simulation is good for reproducing the damage process of the RC slab in accordance with the actual situation. The SPH–FEM coupling algorithm is more justified than the FEM in simulating the large deformation problem, and it can provide a new calculation method for the design and calculation of the rockfall protection structure.
Q2

Study on the mechanical properties and microstructure of recycled brick aggregate concrete with waste fiber
Wang T., Cui S., Ren X., Zhang W., Yang X., Gong S., Yang D., Li B., Zhang W., Su T., Mei X., Dong X., Duan L., Ma Z., Cao X., et. al.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Recycled concrete technology can promote the sustainable development of the construction industry, but the insufficient mechanical properties of recycled concrete have become a key constraint on its development. By adding waste fibers, the mechanical properties of recycled concrete can be improved, and the problem of disposing of waste polypropylene fibers can be solved. In this article, the effects of recycled brick aggregate content and waste fiber content on the mechanical properties and microstructures of recycled brick aggregate concrete through macroscopic mechanical experiments and microstructure experiments are investigated. The results show that the addition of recycled brick aggregate reduces the mechanical properties of concrete; when the content of recycled brick aggregate is 100%, the compressive strength and splitting tensile strength decrease by 22.04 and 20.00%, respectively. The addition of waste fibers can improve the mechanical properties of recycled brick aggregate concrete, but it is necessary to control the contents of waste fibers in a certain range. When the content of waste fibers is 0.08%, the best improvement effect on the mechanical properties of concrete is achieved; the compressive strength of concrete with a 50% (100%) recycled aggregate replacement rate increases by 6.06% (8.90%), while the splitting tensile strength of concrete with a 50% (100%) recycled aggregate replacement rate increases by 2.30% (6.16%). Through microstructural analysis, the mechanism by which waste fiber improves the mechanical properties of recycled brick aggregate concrete is revealed. The addition of waste fibers has the effect of strengthening the framework inside the recycled brick aggregate concrete, forming a good structural stress system and allowing the recycled brick aggregate concrete to continue to bear loads after cracking. In this study, waste brick aggregate and waste fiber are effectively utilized, which can not only reduce pollution to the environment but also realize the sustainable utilization of resources.
Q2

Coverage and reliability improvement of copper metallization layer in through hole at BGA area during load board manufacture
Zhu K., Xing R., Jiang Z., Zhong R., Chen L., Liu J., Miao H., Zhou G.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The dimple of ball grid array (BGA) area with 70 mm × 70 mm size on load board for high performance integrated circuit final test is investigated by shadow moire at first, the dimple of BGA area decreases from 184.3 to 97.1 μm when six additional prepregs with 60 mm × 60 mm size are added at BGA area before hot lamination process. The micromorphology and stress/strain simulation are conducted to improve the coverage and reliability of copper metallization layer in through hole at that BGA area. The microcracks of electroless copper layer at the position of glass fiber and inner layer copper pad, which leads to serious crack after solder float, are well covered by subsequent electroplating copper layer. When the through holes at BGA area with 0.2 mm diameter and 7.0 mm depth are fabricated based on insulating dielectric material used for high-speed signal transmission, the simulation results point out that IT968 is better than M6G for the thermal shock reliability of through hole metallization layer. A load board vehicle with 126 layers and 8.3 mm thickness based on IT968 shows good interconnection structure reliability after 12 times 288°C solder float.
Q2

Finite element analysis of deterioration of axial compression behavior of corroded steel-reinforced concrete middle-length columns
Nie R., Chen Y., Xing Z., Chen L., Yue Z., Chen W., Chen Y., Chen L., Liu S., Chen J.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 8
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The corrosion problem of steel-reinforced concrete (SRC) columns in coastal areas is becoming increasingly severe and needs to be solved urgently. This study established a numerical analysis model for SRC middle-length columns considering corrosion effects. The bond–slip constitutive relationship between corroded steel and concrete was established. It was found that when the rust rate is low, the bonding stress of SRC columns is slightly increased compared to those without corrosion. The ultimate and residual bonding stress will decrease significantly when the rust rate exceeds 1.5%. The comparison between the numerical analysis model and the experimental results shows that the establishment of the model is reasonable. Subsequent parameter analysis showed that for corroded SRC mid-length columns, the larger the slenderness ratio of the component, the faster the decrease in axial compression performance. The rust rate increased from 0 to 30%, and the axial compression performance of SRC columns decreased significantly. When the rust rate exceeded 30%, the axial compression performance of concrete columns tended to stabilize. A formula for calculating SRC middle-length columns’ ultimate bearing capacity considering corrosion effects has been proposed.
Q2

Effect of impurity components in titanium gypsum on the setting time and mechanical properties of gypsum-slag cementitious materials
Li Y., Jia Z., Li S., Li P., Jiang X., Zhang Z., Yu B.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 1
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The use of titanium gypsum instead of gypsum as a raw material for the preparation of gypsum-slag cementitious materials (GSCM) can reduce the cost and improve the utilization of solid waste. However, titanium gypsum contains impurities such as Fe2O3, MgO, and TiO2, which make its effect on the performance of GSCM uncertain. To investigate this issue, GSCM doped with different ratios of Fe2O3, MgO, and TiO2 were prepared in this study, the setting time and the strength of GSCM at 3, 7, and 28 days were tested. The effects of different oxides on the performance of GSCM were also investigated by scanning electron microscopy, energy spectrum analysis, X-ray diffraction analysis, and thermogravimetric analysis. The experimental results showed that Fe2O3, MgO, and TiO2 all had a certain procoagulant effect on GSCM and a slight effect on the strength. Through micro-analysis, it was found that the main hydration products of GSCM were AFt phase and calcium–alumina–silicate–hydrate (C–(A)–S–H) gels. Fe-rich C–(A)–S–H gels were observed with the addition of Fe2O3, and Mg(OH)2 and M–S–H gels were observed with the addition of MgO. The addition of TiO2 did not result in new hydration products from GSCM.
Q2

Research progress on Fe3+-activated near-infrared phosphor
Sun B., Zhang H., Wang Y.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 3
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Fe3+-activated near-infrared (NIR) luminescent materials have attracted widespread attention due to their tunable emission wavelength and extensive applications in various fields such as plant growth, food analysis, biomedical imaging, and night vision. Many excellent NIR materials have been developed by introducing non-toxic and environmentally friendly Fe3+ ions into different inorganic hosts. This article elucidates the luminescent properties of Fe3+ ions by combining the Tanabe–Sugano energy level diagram and the configuration coordinate model. The latest research progress on Fe3+-doped NIR luminescent materials is outlined, summarizing the luminescent characteristics of various Fe3+-doped materials, including emission wavelength, emission bandwidth, quantum efficiency, and thermal stability. Particularly, a detailed summary and analysis of the application areas of Fe3+-doped NIR luminescent materials are provided. Finally, the future prospects and challenges faced by Fe3+-doped NIR luminescent materials are presented. This review contributes to a deeper understanding of the luminescence mechanism of Fe3+ and the research progress of iron ion-doped luminescent materials, aiming to develop advanced Fe3+-activated NIR luminescent materials with enhanced performance and explore new application fields.
Q2

Experimenting the influence of corncob ash on the mechanical strength of slag-based geopolymer concrete
Wang J., Qu Q., Khan S.A., Alotaibi B.S., Althoey F., Gamil Y., Najeh T.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 1
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The construction sector has been under growing public attention recently as one of the leading causes of climate change and its detrimental effects on local communities. In this regard, geopolymer concrete (GPC) has been proposed as a replacement for conventional concrete. Predicting the concrete’s strength before pouring is, therefore, quite useful. The mechanical strength of slag and corncob ash (SCA–GPC), a GPC made from slag and corncob ash, was predicted utilizing multi-expression programming (MEP). Modeling parameters’ relative importance was determined using sensitivity analysis. When estimating the compressive, flexural, and split tensile strengths of SCA–GPC with MEP, 0.95, 0.93, and 0.92 R
2-values were noted between the target and predicted results. The developed models were validated using statistical tests for error and efficiency. The sensitivity analysis revealed that within the mix proportions, the slag quantity (65%), curing age (25%), and fine aggregate (3.30%) quantity significantly influenced the mechanical strength of SCA–GPC. The MEP models result in distinct empirical equations for the strength characteristics of SCA–GPC, unlike Python-based models, which might aid industry and researchers worldwide in determining optimal mix design proportions, thus eliminating unneeded test repetitions in the laboratory.
Q2

Enhancement of hardness and wear strength of pure Cu and Cu–TiO2 composites via a friction stir process while maintaining electrical resistivity
Alnaser I.A., Yunus M.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 1
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The study aims to enhance the hardness and wear of copper and Cu–TiO2-based composites while maintaining high electrical conductivity through friction stir processing (FSP). It assesses the impact of TiO2 volume fractions and groove widths (GWs) on the wear, hardness, resistivity, and microstructure of FSPed Cu and FSPed Cu–TiO2 surface composite. The samples obtained from the stir zone showed an increase in microhardness of the Cu–TiO2 surface composite due to particle refinement, uniform distribution, and efficient sticking of TiO2 with Cu. Furthermore, the wear rate increased with decreasing TiO2 volume fractions in the composite. The worn surface microstructural analysis indicated a transition from harsh to gentle wear with increasing TiO2 volume fractions and GWs. The average grain size reduced significantly in reinforced stir zones compared to pure Cu, and particle size decreased further with increasing groove size. Hardness increased by 25 and 50% compared to unprocessed Cu, but only a negligible increase in electrical resistivity (2.3% Ωm) after FSP.
Q2

Effect of sand–precursor ratio on mechanical properties and durability of geopolymer mortar with manufactured sand
Zhang P., Su J., Gao Z., Zhang T., Zhang P.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 11
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The geopolymer mortar (GPM) prepared from industrial by-products and alkali activation solution (AAS) is one of the hot spots of current building materials. As a feasible alternative to natural river sand, manufactured sand (MS) alleviates the global ecological pressure. In this study, MS was used for fine aggregate. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) solution were used as AAS. Metakaolin (MK) and fly ash (FA) were used as the precursor to prepare MK-FA-based GPM with MS (MS-GPM), which was of great significance for saving non-renewable resources, mitigating the greenhouse effect, and recycling waste. Numerous studies were conducted to explore the effect of sand–precursor ratio (r
sp) on mechanical and durability characteristics of MS-GPM. Relationships between compressive strength and tensile or flexural strength were established by linear fitting equation. Finally, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to systematically calculate the effect of r
sp on performance. The results indicated that the mechanical strength and impermeability of MS-GPM decreased and crack resistance increased with r
sp from 1 to 5. The strength of MS-GPM was the best when r
sp was 1. With the increase of r
sp, the proportion of MS in MS-GPM increases, and the relative cementitious material decreases, which has an adverse impact on mechanical properties and impermeability. Linear fitting revealed that the compressive strength of MS-GPM was closely related to tensile strength and flexural strength. ANOVA results indicated that r
sp in the range of 1–5 had great effects on the performance of MS-GPM. The aim of this article is to further promote the possibility of applying MS-GPM in practical engineering by designing reasonable r
sp.
Q2

Exploring the viability of AI-aided genetic algorithms in estimating the crack repair rate of self-healing concrete
Tian Q., Lu Y., Zhou J., Song S., Yang L., Cheng T., Huang J.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 4
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
As a potential replacement for traditional concrete, which has cracking and poor durability issues, self-healing concrete (SHC) has been the research subject. However, conducting lab trials can be expensive and time-consuming. Therefore, machine learning (ML)-based predictions can aid improved formulations of self-healing concrete. The aim of this work is to develop ML models that could analyze and forecast the rate of healing of the cracked area (CrA) of bacteria- and fiber-containing SHC. These models were constructed using gene expression programming (GEP) and multi-expression programming (MEP) tools. The discrepancy between expected and desired results, statistical tests, Taylor’s diagram, and R
2 values were additional metrics used to assess the constructed models. A SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach was used to evaluate which input attributes were highly relevant. With R
2 = 0.93, MAE = 0.047, MAPE = 12.60%, and RMSE = 0.062, the GEP produced somewhat worse predictions than the MEP (R
2 = 0.93, MAE = 0.033, MAPE = 9.60%, and RMSE = 0.044). Bacteria had an indirect (negative) relationship with the CrA of SHC, while fiber had a direct (positive) association, according to the SHAP study. The SHAP study might help researchers and companies figure out how much of each raw material is needed for SHCs. Therefore, MEP and GEP models can be used to generate and test SHC compositions based on bacteria and polymeric fibers.
Q2

Grinding force model for ultrasonic assisted grinding of γ-TiAl intermetallic compounds and experimental validation
Li Z., Yang S., Liu X., Xiao G., San H., Zhang Y., Wang W., Yang Z.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The introduction of ultrasonic vibration in the grinding process of γ-TiAl intermetallic compounds can significantly reduce its processing difficulty. It is of great significance to understand the grinding mechanism of γ-TiAl intermetallic compounds and improve the processing efficiency by studying the mechanism of ordinary grinding of abrasive grains. Based on this, this study proposes a grinding force prediction model based on single-grain ultrasonic assisted grinding (UAG) chip formation mechanism. First, the prediction model of grinding force is established based on the chip formation mechanism of abrasive sliding ordinary grinding and the theory of ultrasonic assisted machining, considering the plastic deformation and shear effect in the process of material processing. Second, the UAG experiment of γ-TiAl intermetallic compounds was carried out by using diamond grinding wheel, and the unknown coefficient in the model was determined. Finally, the predicted values and experimental values of grinding force under different parameters were compared to verify the rationality of the model. It was found that the maximum deviation between the predicted value of tangential force and the actual value is 23%, and the maximum deviation between the predicted value of normal force and the actual value is 21.7%. In addition, by changing the relevant parameters, the model can predict the grinding force of different metal materials under different processing parameters, which is helpful for optimizing the UAG parameters and improving the processing efficiency.
Q2

Ultrasonic resonance evaluation method for deep interfacial debonding defects of multilayer adhesive bonded materials
Guo C., Xu C., Xiao D., Cheng G., Zhong Y., Ding J.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Multilayer adhesive bonded structures/materials (MABS) are widely used as structural components, especially in the field of aerospace. However, for MABS workpieces, the facts that the weak echo of the deep interfacial debonding defects (DB) caused by the large acoustic attenuation coefficient of each layer and this echo, which generally aliases with the excitation wave and the backwall echo of the surface layer, pose a great challenge for the conventional longitudinal wave ultrasonic nondestructive testing methods. In this work, an ultrasonic resonance evaluation method for deep interfacial DBs of MABS is proposed based on the ultrasonic resonance theory and the aliasing effect of ultrasonic waves in MABS. Theoretical and simulation analysis show that the optimal inspection frequency for II-interfacial DBs is 500 kHz when the shell thickness is 1.5 mm and the ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM) thickness is 1.5 mm, and the optimal inspection frequency is 250 kHz when the shell thickness is 1.5 or 2.0 mm and the EPDM thickness is 2.0 mm. Verification experiments show that the presence of a DB in the II-interface causes a resonance effect, and in the same inspection configuration, the larger the defect size, the more pronounced this effect is. This resonance effect manifests itself as an increase in the amplitude and an increase in the vibration time of the A-scan signal as well as a pronounced change in the frequency of the received ultrasonic wave. In addition, the increase in the excitation voltage further highlights the ultrasonic resonance effect. Four imaging methods – the integrations of the signal and the signal envelope curve, the maximum amplitude of the fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the signal, and the signal energy – were used for C-scan imaging of ultrasonic resonance evaluation of MABS’s deep interfacial DBs and all these methods can clearly show the sizes and locations of the artificial defects and internal natural defect. The normalized C-scan imaging method proposed in this study can further highlight the weak changes in the signals in the C-scan image. The research results of this study have laid a solid theoretical and practical foundation for the ultrasonic resonance evaluation of MABS.
Q2

Powder metallurgy processing of high entropy alloys: Bibliometric analysis and systematic review
Akinwekomi A.D., Bamisaye O.S., Bodunrin M.O.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Research attention in powder metallurgy (PM) processing of high-entropy alloys (HEAs) is rising. Some reviews have been published but a detailed historical analysis to identify the thematic research areas and prospective future research areas is lacking. Therefore, this study presents a bibliometric literature analysis of PM-processed HEAs by mapping and clustering 700 articles published between 2007 and August 2022 in the Scopus database. The most prolific authors, their collaborators, institutions, and most preferred journals publishing PM-HEA works are identified and mapped. Publication trend shows that significant research attention in the PM processing of HEAs began to gain traction in 2016. The top three journals in this field are Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Materials Science and Engineering A, and Intermetallics. However, co-authorship network analysis does not reveal significant inter-institutional research collaboration indicating that strengthening this area could help to accelerate scientific discovery, enhance technology transfer, and commercialization of HEA products. Based on the co-occurrence frequencies of author keywords, popular research directions are identified, and a systematic review of emerging functional applications is undertaken. This work provides a comprehensive visual reference guide for researchers to deepen their knowledge of this field and delivers insight into prospective future research opportunities to stimulate further ground-breaking works.
Q2

Marine polymers in tissue bioprinting: Current achievements and challenges
Banach-Kopeć A., Mania S., Tylingo R.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Bioprinting has a critical role in tissue engineering, allowing the creation of sophisticated cellular scaffolds with high resolution, shape fidelity, and cell viability. Achieving these parameters remains a challenge, necessitating bioinks that are biocompatible, printable, and biodegradable. This review highlights the potential of marine-derived polymers and crosslinking techniques including mammalian collagen and gelatin along with their marine equivalents. While denaturation temperatures vary based on origin, warm-water fish collagen and gelatin emerge as promising solutions. Building on the applications of mammalian collagen and gelatin, this study investigates their marine counterparts. Diverse research groups present different perspectives on printability and cell survival. Despite advances, current scaffolds are limited in size and layers, making applications such as extensive skin burn treatment or tissue regeneration difficult. The authors argue for the development of bioprinting, which includes spherical and adaptive printing. In adaptive printing, layers differentiate and propagate sequentially to overcome the challenges of multilayer printing and provide optimal conditions for the growth of deeply embedded cells. Moving the boundaries of bioprinting, future prospects include transformative applications in regenerative medicine.
Q2

Exploring the potential of agricultural waste as an additive in ultra-high-performance concrete for sustainable construction: A comprehensive review
Zhao J., Sufian M., Abuhussain M.A., Althoey F., Deifalla A.F.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
This study thoroughly reviews the recent design methods for ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) with agricultural waste. The goal is to identify UHPC composites that meets environmental sustainability requirements while fulfilling workability, durability, and mechanical properties. The capacity of typical review studies is limited in bridging the various literature aspects systematically. The article includes comparative analyses identifying these methods’ intrinsic connections and current trends. The analysis indicates that 71% of documents on incorporating agricultural waste into UHPC are in the “Engineering” and “Materials Science” disciplines, with 69% being journal articles, and 27% conference documents. Significant research keywords involve “Ultra-High-Performance Concrete,” “Cements,” “Sustainable Development,” and “Agricultural Wastes,” highlighting the extensive exploration of agricultural waste in UHPC. It has been discovered that agricultural waste can replace silica fume in UHPC, improving strength and durability by reducing pore volume and enhancing microstructure. Substituting 5–30% of cement with rice husk ash significantly boosts compressive strength, enhancing cement hydration, pore structure, and pozzolanic reaction, offering substantial environmental benefits and supporting the construction industry’s contribution to low-carbon sustainable development. This article provides guidance and recommendations for developing sustainable UHPC to meet diverse design specifications, promoting environmentally friendly construction practices.
Top-100
Citing journals
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
|
|
AIDS and Behavior
2511 citations, 8.91%
|
|
AIDS Care - Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of AIDS/HIV
1112 citations, 3.95%
|
|
AIDS Education and Prevention
897 citations, 3.18%
|
|
PLoS ONE
778 citations, 2.76%
|
|
BMC Public Health
608 citations, 2.16%
|
|
Archives of Sexual Behavior
604 citations, 2.14%
|
|
Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
539 citations, 1.91%
|
|
AIDS Patient Care and STDs
470 citations, 1.67%
|
|
American Journal of Public Health
335 citations, 1.19%
|
|
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
298 citations, 1.06%
|
|
AIDS
294 citations, 1.04%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
259 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care
250 citations, 0.89%
|
|
Social Science and Medicine
245 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Journal of the International AIDS Society
244 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Journal of Sex Research
233 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Culture, Health and Sexuality
233 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Sexual Health
230 citations, 0.82%
|
|
International Journal of STD and AIDS
222 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
191 citations, 0.68%
|
|
International Journal of Drug Policy
190 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Journal of Urban Health
174 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Current HIV/AIDS Reports
173 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Journal of Adolescent Health
162 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Journal of HIV/AIDS and Social Services
149 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Substance Use and Misuse
146 citations, 0.52%
|
|
American Journal of Men's Health
146 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Sexuality Research and Social Policy
141 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Journal of Homosexuality
141 citations, 0.5%
|
|
JMIR Research Protocols
133 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
131 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Global Public Health
126 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Health Promotion Practice
123 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Sexually Transmitted Infections
116 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Health Education and Behavior
116 citations, 0.41%
|
|
BMC Infectious Diseases
115 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Journal of Medical Internet Research
108 citations, 0.38%
|
|
BMJ Open
107 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
104 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Public Health Reports
100 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Health Education Research
94 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
92 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Journal of Correctional Health Care
92 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Qualitative Health Research
91 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care
89 citations, 0.32%
|
|
BMC Health Services Research
88 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Harm Reduction Journal
79 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Implementation Science
79 citations, 0.28%
|
|
LGBT Health
78 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities
78 citations, 0.28%
|
|
International Journal of Sexual Health
77 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Prevention Science
77 citations, 0.27%
|
|
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
77 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Sahara J
76 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Evaluation and Program Planning
70 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Health Psychology
67 citations, 0.24%
|
|
American Journal of Community Psychology
67 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Community Health
65 citations, 0.23%
|
|
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
64 citations, 0.23%
|
|
African Journal of AIDS Research
64 citations, 0.23%
|
|
The Lancet
61 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Gay and Lesbian Social Services
58 citations, 0.21%
|
|
JMIR Formative Research
58 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Health Communication
53 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS
53 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Health Care for Women International
53 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Sex Education
51 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Sexuality and Culture
51 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Translational Behavioral Medicine
51 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Clinical Infectious Diseases
49 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Children and Youth Services Review
48 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Addiction
47 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Health Communication
47 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Addictive Behaviors
47 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
46 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Health Education Journal
45 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Women's Health
45 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Transgender Health
44 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Religion and Health
44 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
43 citations, 0.15%
|
|
AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses
42 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
41 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Rural Health
41 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Drug Issues
40 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Community Psychology
39 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Social Work in Public Health
39 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Public Health
39 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Gay and Lesbian Mental Health
39 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Reproductive Health
38 citations, 0.13%
|
|
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
38 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of American College Health
38 citations, 0.13%
|
|
The Lancet HIV
36 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Nicotine and Tobacco Research
36 citations, 0.13%
|
|
AIDS Research and Therapy
36 citations, 0.13%
|
|
BMC Women's Health
36 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality
35 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
35 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment
35 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
35 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Trials
34 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
|
Citing publishers
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
|
|
Springer Nature
6686 citations, 23.73%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
4631 citations, 16.44%
|
|
Elsevier
2800 citations, 9.94%
|
|
SAGE
2258 citations, 8.01%
|
|
Wiley
1714 citations, 6.08%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
1452 citations, 5.15%
|
|
Guilford Publications
935 citations, 3.32%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
872 citations, 3.09%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
734 citations, 2.61%
|
|
JMIR Publications
614 citations, 2.18%
|
|
Oxford University Press
536 citations, 1.9%
|
|
MDPI
420 citations, 1.49%
|
|
BMJ
382 citations, 1.36%
|
|
American Public Health Association
336 citations, 1.19%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
246 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
238 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
163 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
100 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Emerald
91 citations, 0.32%
|
|
SciELO
79 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
55 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
51 citations, 0.18%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
44 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
40 citations, 0.14%
|
|
AOSIS
38 citations, 0.13%
|
|
National Medical Association
34 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Annual Reviews
34 citations, 0.12%
|
|
IGI Global
34 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
29 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
28 citations, 0.1%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
27 citations, 0.1%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
24 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
23 citations, 0.08%
|
|
National Inquiry Services Center (NISC)
23 citations, 0.08%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
22 citations, 0.08%
|
|
22 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Springer Publishing Company
18 citations, 0.06%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
18 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
16 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
15 citations, 0.05%
|
|
15 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
15 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
15 citations, 0.05%
|
|
CAIRN
12 citations, 0.04%
|
|
National Coordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment
11 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society for Nutrition
10 citations, 0.04%
|
|
F1000 Research
10 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
10 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
SLACK
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
PeerJ
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Societe Francaise de Sante Publique
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
S. Karger AG
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
DoNotEdit
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Health Affairs (Project Hope)
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
World Health Organization
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Centers for Disease Control MMWR Office
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Nakladatelske Stredisko CLSJE Purkyne
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
National Association of Social Workers Press
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academic Journals
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (ECDC)
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Marketing Association
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IOS Press
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
EDP Sciences
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Max-Planck Institute for Demographic Research/Max-Planck-institut fur Demografische Forschung
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Associacao Brasileira de Enfermagem
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
University of Illinois Press
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academy of Medicine Singapore
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Massachusetts Medical Society
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Thoracic Society
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Medknow
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
OpenEdition
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
PAGEPress Publications
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Brieflands
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Psychiatric Association Publishing
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Southern Public Administration Education Foundation, Inc.
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Universidad Catolica de Colombia
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Economic Association
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
U.S. Agency for International Development
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Biola University
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Nucleo de Comunicacao, Fundacao UNI
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Wilfrid Laurier University Press
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
CMA Impact Inc.
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Men's Studies Press, LLC
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
32 publications, 2.76%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
27 publications, 2.33%
|
|
Columbia University
25 publications, 2.15%
|
|
Brown University
19 publications, 1.64%
|
|
Northwestern University
17 publications, 1.46%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
17 publications, 1.46%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
16 publications, 1.38%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
14 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Emory University
12 publications, 1.03%
|
|
University of Washington
11 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Duke University
10 publications, 0.86%
|
|
University of Michigan
9 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University of New South Wales
8 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Chicago
8 publications, 0.69%
|
|
George Washington University
7 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Harvard University
7 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
7 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Wake Forest University
7 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Lurie Children's Hospital
7 publications, 0.6%
|
|
South African Medical Research Council
6 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Minnesota
6 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Miami
6 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
6 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Southern California
5 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Drexel University
5 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Medical College of Wisconsin
5 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
5 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
5 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
4 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
4 publications, 0.34%
|
|
New York University
4 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Ohio State University
4 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
4 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of the Philippines Manila
4 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of British Columbia
4 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Temple University
4 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Fordham University
4 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Rochester
4 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Delaware
4 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Portland State University
4 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Ghent University
3 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Malaya
3 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
3 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Cape Town
3 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Stanford University
3 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Gadjah Mada University
3 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Udayana University
3 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
3 publications, 0.26%
|
|
San Diego State University
3 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Baylor College of Medicine
3 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
3 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Florida International University
3 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Kentucky
3 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
3 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Rhode Island Hospital
3 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
3 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Connecticut
3 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Aix-Marseille University
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Australian National University
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University College London
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Statens Serum Institut
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Maastricht University
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Yale University
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
La Trobe University
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of the Witwatersrand
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of Pretoria
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of KwaZulu-Natal
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Boston University
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Makerere University
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Arizona State University
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
North Carolina State University
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Education University of Hong Kong
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Oregon Health & Science University
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Boston Children's Hospital
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of Central Florida
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of South Florida
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of Botswana
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Utrecht University
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of Victoria
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of Toronto
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Mississippi State University
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Indiana University School of Medicine
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Texas A&M University
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Texas Christian University
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
University of Houston
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Kenya Medical Research Institute
2 publications, 0.17%
|
|
Saint Petersburg State University
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
Hanoi Medical University
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
|
|
Columbia University
18 publications, 9.47%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
17 publications, 8.95%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
13 publications, 6.84%
|
|
Northwestern University
11 publications, 5.79%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
11 publications, 5.79%
|
|
Brown University
11 publications, 5.79%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
8 publications, 4.21%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
7 publications, 3.68%
|
|
Duke University
6 publications, 3.16%
|
|
Emory University
6 publications, 3.16%
|
|
University of New South Wales
5 publications, 2.63%
|
|
George Washington University
5 publications, 2.63%
|
|
South African Medical Research Council
5 publications, 2.63%
|
|
Harvard University
5 publications, 2.63%
|
|
University of Washington
5 publications, 2.63%
|
|
University of Chicago
5 publications, 2.63%
|
|
University of Miami
5 publications, 2.63%
|
|
Wake Forest University
5 publications, 2.63%
|
|
Drexel University
4 publications, 2.11%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
4 publications, 2.11%
|
|
University of Minnesota
4 publications, 2.11%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
4 publications, 2.11%
|
|
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
4 publications, 2.11%
|
|
Lurie Children's Hospital
4 publications, 2.11%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
4 publications, 2.11%
|
|
University of Southern California
3 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Stanford University
3 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
3 publications, 1.58%
|
|
New York University
3 publications, 1.58%
|
|
San Diego State University
3 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
3 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Fordham University
3 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
3 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Rhode Island Hospital
3 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
3 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
3 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Ghent University
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Statens Serum Institut
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Maastricht University
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Makerere University
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
North Carolina State University
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Education University of Hong Kong
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Ohio State University
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of the Philippines Manila
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Central Florida
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Michigan
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of British Columbia
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Utrecht University
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Medical College of Wisconsin
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Florida International University
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Kentucky
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Mississippi State University
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Delaware
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Texas A&M University
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Texas Christian University
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Connecticut
2 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Hanoi Medical University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Fudan University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Aix-Marseille University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Malaya
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Bordeaux
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
National Defence University of Malaysia
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Australian National University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University College London
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Oxford
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Florida State University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
National Taiwan Normal University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Anhui Medical University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Yale University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Minjiang University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Universite Libre de Bruxelles
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Ghent University Hospital
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
La Trobe University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Cape Town
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of KwaZulu-Natal
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Georgetown University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Boston University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Princeton University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Gadjah Mada University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Udayana University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Mahidol University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Chiang Mai University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Western Washington University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Arizona State University
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
City University of Hong Kong
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of Missouri–Kansas City
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
1 publication, 0.53%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
|
USA
|
USA, 270, 23.26%
USA
270 publications, 23.26%
|
China
|
China, 15, 1.29%
China
15 publications, 1.29%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 14, 1.21%
South Africa
14 publications, 1.21%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 10, 0.86%
Australia
10 publications, 0.86%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 10, 0.86%
Kenya
10 publications, 0.86%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 8, 0.69%
Canada
8 publications, 0.69%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 7, 0.6%
Thailand
7 publications, 0.6%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 5, 0.43%
United Kingdom
5 publications, 0.43%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 5, 0.43%
Malawi
5 publications, 0.43%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 5, 0.43%
Netherlands
5 publications, 0.43%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 4, 0.34%
Russia
4 publications, 0.34%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 4, 0.34%
Botswana
4 publications, 0.34%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 4, 0.34%
Zambia
4 publications, 0.34%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 4, 0.34%
Indonesia
4 publications, 0.34%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 4, 0.34%
Malaysia
4 publications, 0.34%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 4, 0.34%
Uganda
4 publications, 0.34%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 4, 0.34%
Philippines
4 publications, 0.34%
|
France
|
France, 3, 0.26%
France
3 publications, 0.26%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 3, 0.26%
Belgium
3 publications, 0.26%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 3, 0.26%
Vietnam
3 publications, 0.26%
|
Guatemala
|
Guatemala, 3, 0.26%
Guatemala
3 publications, 0.26%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 3, 0.26%
Zimbabwe
3 publications, 0.26%
|
India
|
India, 3, 0.26%
India
3 publications, 0.26%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 3, 0.26%
Italy
3 publications, 0.26%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 2, 0.17%
Kazakhstan
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 2, 0.17%
Brazil
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 0.17%
Denmark
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 2, 0.17%
Colombia
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 2, 0.17%
Mexico
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Mozambique
|
Mozambique, 2, 0.17%
Mozambique
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.09%
Ukraine
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.09%
Portugal
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Dominican Republic
|
Dominican Republic, 1, 0.09%
Dominican Republic
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.09%
Israel
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 1, 0.09%
Spain
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
Côte d'Ivoire, 1, 0.09%
Côte d'Ivoire
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.09%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Namibia
|
Namibia, 1, 0.09%
Namibia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.09%
Peru
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 1, 0.09%
Puerto Rico
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Rwanda
|
Rwanda, 1, 0.09%
Rwanda
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.09%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 1, 0.09%
Tanzania
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.09%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Show all (14 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
|
USA
|
USA, 157, 82.63%
USA
157 publications, 82.63%
|
China
|
China, 8, 4.21%
China
8 publications, 4.21%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 7, 3.68%
Kenya
7 publications, 3.68%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 7, 3.68%
South Africa
7 publications, 3.68%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 6, 3.16%
Australia
6 publications, 3.16%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 4, 2.11%
Zambia
4 publications, 2.11%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 4, 2.11%
Canada
4 publications, 2.11%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 4, 2.11%
Malawi
4 publications, 2.11%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 4, 2.11%
Netherlands
4 publications, 2.11%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 3, 1.58%
Russia
3 publications, 1.58%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 3, 1.58%
United Kingdom
3 publications, 1.58%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 3, 1.58%
Zimbabwe
3 publications, 1.58%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 3, 1.58%
Thailand
3 publications, 1.58%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 3, 1.58%
Uganda
3 publications, 1.58%
|
France
|
France, 2, 1.05%
France
2 publications, 1.05%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 2, 1.05%
Kazakhstan
2 publications, 1.05%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 2, 1.05%
Belgium
2 publications, 1.05%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 2, 1.05%
Botswana
2 publications, 1.05%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 2, 1.05%
Vietnam
2 publications, 1.05%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 2, 1.05%
Denmark
2 publications, 1.05%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 2, 1.05%
Malaysia
2 publications, 1.05%
|
Mozambique
|
Mozambique, 2, 1.05%
Mozambique
2 publications, 1.05%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 2, 1.05%
Philippines
2 publications, 1.05%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.53%
Portugal
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 0.53%
Brazil
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Guatemala
|
Guatemala, 1, 0.53%
Guatemala
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Dominican Republic
|
Dominican Republic, 1, 0.53%
Dominican Republic
1 publication, 0.53%
|
India
|
India, 1, 0.53%
India
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.53%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 1, 0.53%
Spain
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 1, 0.53%
Italy
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.53%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
Côte d'Ivoire, 1, 0.53%
Côte d'Ivoire
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.53%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Namibia
|
Namibia, 1, 0.53%
Namibia
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 1, 0.53%
Puerto Rico
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.53%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.53%
|
Show all (7 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|