volume 51 issue 6 pages 1149-1168

Towards an Ethical Framework for Publishing Twitter Data in Social Research: Taking into Account Users’ Views, Online Context and Algorithmic Estimation

Matthew R. Williams 1
Peter Burnap 1
LUKE SLOAN 1
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2017-05-26
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR1.497
CiteScore5.7
Impact factor2.9
ISSN00380385, 14698684
Sociology and Political Science
Abstract

New and emerging forms of data, including posts harvested from social media sites such as Twitter, have become part of the sociologist’s data diet. In particular, some researchers see an advantage in the perceived ‘public’ nature of Twitter posts, representing them in publications without seeking informed consent. While such practice may not be at odds with Twitter’s terms of service, we argue there is a need to interpret these through the lens of social science research methods that imply a more reflexive ethical approach than provided in ‘legal’ accounts of the permissible use of these data in research publications. To challenge some existing practice in Twitter-based research, this article brings to the fore: (1) views of Twitter users through analysis of online survey data; (2) the effect of context collapse and online disinhibition on the behaviours of users; and (3) the publication of identifiable sensitive classifications derived from algorithms.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Journal of Medical Internet Research
8 publications, 3.03%
Social Media and Society
5 publications, 1.89%
PLoS ONE
5 publications, 1.89%
JMIR Formative Research
4 publications, 1.52%
Big Data and Society
3 publications, 1.14%
New Media and Society
3 publications, 1.14%
Feminism and Psychology
3 publications, 1.14%
Information Communication and Society
3 publications, 1.14%
Netzwerkforschung
3 publications, 1.14%
Memory Studies
2 publications, 0.76%
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
2 publications, 0.76%
Social Science Computer Review
2 publications, 0.76%
Sociological Research Online
2 publications, 0.76%
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
2 publications, 0.76%
Frontiers in Genetics
2 publications, 0.76%
Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science
2 publications, 0.76%
Health Expectations
2 publications, 0.76%
Sociology of Health and Illness
2 publications, 0.76%
Journal of Information Technology and Politics
2 publications, 0.76%
Agenda
2 publications, 0.76%
Communication Review
2 publications, 0.76%
British Journal of Criminology
2 publications, 0.76%
Sexuality and Culture
2 publications, 0.76%
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
2 publications, 0.76%
Online Information Review
1 publication, 0.38%
European Journal of Marketing
1 publication, 0.38%
Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society
1 publication, 0.38%
Information Polity
1 publication, 0.38%
JMIR Mental Health
1 publication, 0.38%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
SAGE
48 publications, 18.18%
Springer Nature
41 publications, 15.53%
Taylor & Francis
40 publications, 15.15%
JMIR Publications
21 publications, 7.95%
Elsevier
19 publications, 7.2%
Wiley
16 publications, 6.06%
Emerald
9 publications, 3.41%
MDPI
7 publications, 2.65%
Frontiers Media S.A.
6 publications, 2.27%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
5 publications, 1.89%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
4 publications, 1.52%
Oxford University Press
4 publications, 1.52%
John Benjamins Publishing Company
3 publications, 1.14%
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
3 publications, 1.14%
World Scientific
2 publications, 0.76%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2 publications, 0.76%
Intellect
2 publications, 0.76%
IGI Global
2 publications, 0.76%
IOS Press
1 publication, 0.38%
American Public Health Association
1 publication, 0.38%
Academy of Cognitive and Natural Sciences
1 publication, 0.38%
Cogitatio
1 publication, 0.38%
Unisa Press
1 publication, 0.38%
Japan Society of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences
1 publication, 0.38%
American Speech Language Hearing Association
1 publication, 0.38%
Berghahn Books
1 publication, 0.38%
OpenEdition
1 publication, 0.38%
SciELO
1 publication, 0.38%
Vilnius University Press
1 publication, 0.38%
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
264
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Williams M. R., Burnap P., SLOAN L. Towards an Ethical Framework for Publishing Twitter Data in Social Research: Taking into Account Users’ Views, Online Context and Algorithmic Estimation // Sociology. 2017. Vol. 51. No. 6. pp. 1149-1168.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Williams M. R., Burnap P., SLOAN L. Towards an Ethical Framework for Publishing Twitter Data in Social Research: Taking into Account Users’ Views, Online Context and Algorithmic Estimation // Sociology. 2017. Vol. 51. No. 6. pp. 1149-1168.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1177/0038038517708140
UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038517708140
TI - Towards an Ethical Framework for Publishing Twitter Data in Social Research: Taking into Account Users’ Views, Online Context and Algorithmic Estimation
T2 - Sociology
AU - Williams, Matthew R.
AU - Burnap, Peter
AU - SLOAN, LUKE
PY - 2017
DA - 2017/05/26
PB - SAGE
SP - 1149-1168
IS - 6
VL - 51
PMID - 29276313
SN - 0038-0385
SN - 1469-8684
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2017_Williams,
author = {Matthew R. Williams and Peter Burnap and LUKE SLOAN},
title = {Towards an Ethical Framework for Publishing Twitter Data in Social Research: Taking into Account Users’ Views, Online Context and Algorithmic Estimation},
journal = {Sociology},
year = {2017},
volume = {51},
publisher = {SAGE},
month = {may},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038517708140},
number = {6},
pages = {1149--1168},
doi = {10.1177/0038038517708140}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Williams, Matthew R., et al. “Towards an Ethical Framework for Publishing Twitter Data in Social Research: Taking into Account Users’ Views, Online Context and Algorithmic Estimation.” Sociology, vol. 51, no. 6, May. 2017, pp. 1149-1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038517708140.