Generative AI Meets Open-Ended Survey Responses: Research Participant Use of AI and Homogenization
The growing popularity of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools presents new challenges for data quality in online surveys and experiments. This study examines participants’ use of large language models to answer open-ended survey questions and describes empirical tendencies in human versus large language model (LLM)-generated text responses. In an original survey of research participants recruited from a popular online platform for sourcing social science research subjects, 34 percent reported using LLMs to help them answer open-ended survey questions. Simulations comparing human-written responses from three pre-ChatGPT studies with LLM-generated text reveal that LLM responses are more homogeneous and positive, particularly when they describe social groups in sensitive questions. These homogenization patterns may mask important underlying social variation in attitudes and beliefs among human subjects, raising concerns about data validity. Our findings shed light on the scope and potential consequences of participants’ LLM use in online research.
Топ-30
Журналы
|
1
2
|
|
|
F1000Research
2 публикации, 12.5%
|
|
|
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics
1 публикация, 6.25%
|
|
|
Social Science Computer Review
1 публикация, 6.25%
|
|
|
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
1 публикация, 6.25%
|
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
1 публикация, 6.25%
|
|
|
AI Magazine
1 публикация, 6.25%
|
|
|
Perspectives on Psychological Science
1 публикация, 6.25%
|
|
|
Journal of Chemical Education
1 публикация, 6.25%
|
|
|
Communications Psychology
1 публикация, 6.25%
|
|
|
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
1 публикация, 6.25%
|
|
|
International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice
1 публикация, 6.25%
|
|
|
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
1 публикация, 6.25%
|
|
|
Public Relations Review
1 публикация, 6.25%
|
|
|
Methodological Innovations
1 публикация, 6.25%
|
|
|
1
2
|
Издатели
|
1
2
3
4
|
|
|
Elsevier
4 публикации, 25%
|
|
|
SAGE
3 публикации, 18.75%
|
|
|
F1000 Research
2 публикации, 12.5%
|
|
|
Cambridge University Press
1 публикация, 6.25%
|
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
1 публикация, 6.25%
|
|
|
Wiley
1 публикация, 6.25%
|
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
1 публикация, 6.25%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
1 публикация, 6.25%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1 публикация, 6.25%
|
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
1 публикация, 6.25%
|
|
|
1
2
3
4
|
- Мы не учитываем публикации, у которых нет DOI.
- Статистика публикаций обновляется еженедельно.