Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
6.5
SJR
3.788
CiteScore
16.3
Categories
Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Sociology and Political Science
Areas
Social Sciences
Years of issue
1972-2025
journal names
Sociological Methods and Research
SOCIOL METHOD RES
Top-3 citing journals

Sociological Methods and Research
(1695 citations)

SSRN Electronic Journal
(1142 citations)

PLoS ONE
(956 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Michigan
(70 publications)

University of Wisconsin–Madison
(54 publications)

University of California, Los Angeles
(49 publications)

GESIS - Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences
(10 publications)

New York University
(10 publications)

University of California, Los Angeles
(8 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 615
Q1

Continuous use of AI technology: the roles of trust and satisfaction
Lam T.
PurposeChat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT), a chatbot with artificial intelligence (AI) technology, opens up new directions for innovation. However, the extent to which literature has not considered the trustworthiness and satisfaction of ChatGPT. Those are important elements leading to continuous use (CU). Particularly, this study investigates the use of the ChatGPT Translate function. Requirements for task-AI-technology fit, trust and satisfaction relevant to ChatGPT Translate are addressed in this study.Design/methodology/approachTask-technology fit (TTF) theory forms the theoretical lens to examine the influences of TTF, AI-tech trust and satisfaction on CU of AI technology. A questionnaire survey was used for data collection. Structural equation modeling was employed to test the research model.FindingsThe findings show task and technology characteristics have positive effects on task-AI-technology fit. Task-AI-technology fit has a positive effect on AI-tech trust, which in turn has a positive effect on the CU of AI technology. Finally, the level of CU of AI technology by users satisfied with its responses is higher than users dissatisfied with its responses.Originality/valueThe results have important theoretical and practical implications for academia and industry to devise strategies and policies on a free-to-use AI system.
Q1

Investigating the impact of quality, technology and trust on customers’ purchase intention and word-of-mouth in S-commerce
Kakkar A., Kalia P., Panesar A., Sood R.
PurposeThis study investigates the impact of quality, technology and trust on customers’ purchase intentions and word-of-mouth in S-commerce.Design/methodology/approachData were collected from 1,162 respondents in India using a quantitative methodology and convenience sampling. The conceptual model and hypotheses were examined using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).FindingsThe findings illustrate that perceived value is influenced by quality, technology and trust. Comprehending perceived value is essential for influencing customers’ buying choices and their inclination to promote favorable word-of-mouth regarding S-commerce websites. In addition, system quality was the most significant predictor among the nine predictors of perceived value for S-commerce sites.Originality/valueThis study represents an initial investigation to elucidate the influence of quality, technology and trust on customers’ purchase intentions and word-of-mouth behavior during Indian consumers’ transition to social commerce, thereby enabling marketers to enhance their business and customer retention strategies.
Q1

A behavioral intention model of Gen Z female’ health information behavior on social media
Afifi S., Bakti I.G., Yaman A., Sumaedi S.
PurposeThis study aims to develop and validate a behavioral intention model for understanding the health information behavior of Generation Z females on social media. The model integrates variables such as familiarity, e-health literacy, trust and altruistic motivation.Design/methodology/approachConducted in Indonesia, the online survey involved 516 active female Generation Z respondents (aged 17–26) seeking health information on social media in the past six months. Utilizing the partial least squares structural equation model (PLS-SEM), the study employed Smart PLS Version 4.0 for rigorous model validation and hypothesis testing in two stages: measurement and structural model analyses. This encompassed evaluating reliability, convergent validity and discriminant validity.FindingsResults indicate that familiarity, e-health literacy, trust and altruistic motivation significantly influence the health information behavior of Generation Z females on social media. Furthermore, both familiarity and e-health literacy positively impact trust in social media as a reliable health information source. The study explores theoretical, managerial and policy implications.Originality/valueSocial media has become a crucial platform for health-related information, particularly among Generation Z females. Despite this, there is a significant research gap in the behavioral intention model for Generation Z females’ health information behavior on social media. This study introduces a unique information behavioral intention model shedding light on this behavior.
Q1

Understanding the role of privacy issues in AIoT device adoption within smart homes: an integrated model of privacy calculus and technology acceptance
Liang S., Shi C.
PurposeThe proliferation of Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) devices has introduced notable privacy concerns, influencing user adoption and trust. This study integrates privacy calculus theory with the technology acceptance model to analyze how privacy risk perception affects users’ intentions to adopt and continue using AIoT devices.Design/methodology/approachA research model was developed and validated using data from 313 AIoT users. Findings indicate that perceived usefulness and ease of use significantly enhance users’ trust in AIoT devices. Additionally, prior privacy experiences and privacy knowledge amplify users’ privacy concerns.FindingsPrivacy risk perception and concerns reduce trust in AIoT devices but do not significantly deter continued usage intentions, highlighting a “privacy paradox” where functionality and convenience outweigh privacy concerns. Future research is encouraged to examine user attitudes across diverse demographics and controlled settings to gain deeper insights into privacy perceptions and behaviors toward AIoT.Originality/valueThese findings contribute to a comprehensive understanding of AIoT adoption dynamics and offer practical implications for designing privacy-conscious AIoT applications.
Q1

Google Discover data-driven study of user activity on e-commerce platforms
Strzelecki A., Rizun M.
PurposeThis research focuses on the analysis of the recommendation algorithms employed by Google Discover, utilizing data from two e-commerce platforms operating in Poland.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses the information obtained from Google Search Console in a time span of 17 months. The examination of Google Discover focuses on the number of displays, clicks and click-through ratio, from the viewpoints of content publishers and web users.FindingsThe results suggest that user engagement positively influences a website’s efficiency in Google Discover, yet the algorithm also considers variables such as the popularity of similar content on other websites, user location and content update frequency. Thus, a website may be excluded from Discover despite a substantial click count.Originality/valueThere is a lack of studies on how Google Discover is perceived by users based on real data. We offer a quantitative perspective, which has not yet been done. This study offers an overview of the history and evolution of Google Discovery, an overview of data we used to show the perception of the service, and two unique perspectives on recommender service, users and publishers.
Q1

A riot of blooms begins to dazzle the eye: cognitive behavior with multimodal discourse during usefulness judgments of health information
Chen J., Zhang L.
PurposeAs the two sides of the same coin, usefulness and usability have emerged as pivotal research themes in user experience field. This study compares cognitive effort and cognitive resource allocation strategy across documents varying perceived usefulness and then across documents with different objective usability (unimodal vs multimodal discourses).Design/methodology/approachA controlled user study of four identifying tasks related to public health epidemics was conducted to collect data, including document usefulness as perceived by participants, presentation modes of the document and gaze behaviors on each document.FindingsUsefulness and modality discourse impact cognitive effort and resource allocation strategy in health information search. In useless health documents, spatial encoding resource spending increased significantly with multimodal discourse, and a spatial browsing strategy with an evident exploratory feature was applied; while in useful documents, including low-useful and high-useful, both spatial and information encoding resource spending increased significantly with multimodal discourse, and an information processing strategy with an evident comprehensive feature was applied. Notably, multimodal discourse failed to enhance decision-making effectiveness. Furthermore, in useful documents, the interaction effect of the presentation mode of useful information and multimodal discourse on cognitive effort followed an inverted U-shape pattern.Originality/valueThis paper sheds new light on the interaction effect of usefulness and usability on cognitive effort and resource allocation strategy, highlighting its significance in cognitive effort detecting for multimodal discourse and improving effectiveness and efficacy of health information identification by optimizing information presentation mode design.
Q1

Consumer response to OTT subscription promotions in Taiwan: a prospective theoretical perspective
Chen Y., Han H., Hsiao W.
PurposeThis article investigates the impact of consumers’ promotion strategies on the effectiveness of promotional campaigns for subscribing to Over-the-Top (OTT) streaming services, from a prospective theoretical perspective. Additionally, it explores the moderating effects of platform type and subscriber type on promotion strategies in the context of OTT streaming services.Design/methodology/approachThis study employs an experimental design to separately examine the promotion strategies of subscribers. The first part investigates the effect of promotion strategies on promotional effectiveness, regardless of platform and subscriber types, while the second part considers the moderating effects of both platform type and subscriber type on promotional effectiveness.FindingsThe analysis reveals that renewed subscribers exhibit a positive attitude toward incremental promotions and have stronger intentions to subscribe and recommend. Nonrenewed subscribers, in contrast, prefer discount promotions, demonstrating a positive attitude toward them and expressing higher intentions to subscribe and recommend.Originality/valueThis study applies prospect theory to OTT promotion strategies, uncovers the psychological drivers behind promotion effectiveness and examines the moderating role of subscriber type and platform type, thereby providing actionable insights to improve consumers’ attitudes and behavioral intentions.
Q1

Study on the model of factors influencing users’ willingness to participate in misinformation purification on the Weibo platform
Zhao Y., Li G., Mo Z.
PurposeTo explore the influence factors and pathways of users’ willingness to participate in the misinformation purification process on the Weibo platform. The findings of this study are expected to provide valuable insights that can enhance the self-purification mechanisms for misinformation on Weibo, thereby contributing to the effective misinformation control.Design/methodology/approachThe theoretical framework of the quantitative study is a conceptual model integrated with the theory of planned behavior (TPB), social exchange theory (SET) and co-dependency theory. This model was developed to elucidate the influence factors of users’ willingness to participate in the purification of misinformation on the Weibo platform, the conceptual model was tested and refined through questionnaire surveys, structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to assess its validity and reliability.FindingsThe findings reveal that the attitude toward misinformation purification on the Weibo platform exerts the most significant positive influence on the willingness to engage in such activities. Within the context of this research, community involvement and reciprocity are identified as the factors that have the most substantial positive impact on users’ attitude toward misinformation purification. Conversely, risk perception does not demonstrate a significant influence on users’ attitude toward misinformation purification.Originality/valueTaking the Weibo platform as an example, this is a pioneering study on the investigation and mechanism of social media self-purification on misinformation and proposes a new perspective to improve the effectiveness of the social media self-purification mechanism from the perspective of focusing on user intention and motivation.
Q1

Chatbot research in the fields of business and information systems: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis
Li Z., Wu C., Li J., Yuan Q.
PurposeChatbots are increasingly embodied in business and IS contexts to enhance customer and user experience. Despite wide interest in chatbots among business and IS academics, surprisingly, there are no current comprehensive reviews to reveal the knowledge structure of chatbot research in such areas.Design/methodology/approachThis study employed a mixed-method approach that combines systematic review and bibliometric analysis to provide a comprehensive synthesis of chatbot research. The sample was obtained in December 2023 after searching across six databases: EBSCOhost, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, ACM Digital Library and IEEE Computer Society Digital Library.FindingsThis study reveals the major trend in publication trends, countries, article performance and cluster distribution of chatbot research. We also identify the key themes of chatbot research, which mainly focus on how users interact with chatbots and their consequences, such as users’ cognition and behavior. Moreover, several important research agendas have been discussed to address some limitations in the current chatbot research in business and IS fields.Originality/valueThe present review is one of the first attempts to systematically reveal the ongoing knowledge map of chatbots in business and IS fields, which makes important contributions and provides useful resources for future chatbot research and practice.
Q1

Examining generative AI user continuance intention based on the SOR model
Zhou T., Ma X.
PurposeThe purpose of this research is to examine generative artificial intelligence (AI) user continuance intention based on the stimulus-organism-response model.Design/methodology/approachWe adopted a mixed method of structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to conduct data analysis.FindingsThe results found that generative AI content quality (perceived personalization, perceived accuracy and perceived credibility) and system quality (perceived interactivity, perceived anthropomorphism and perceived intelligence) affect sense of empowerment and satisfaction, both of which further determine continuance intention.Originality/valueExtant research has identified the effect of flow, trust and parasocial interaction on generative AI user continuance, but it has seldom disclosed the internal decisional process of generative AI user continuance intention. This research tries to fill this gap, and the results enrich the extant research on generative AI user continuance.
Q1

The impact of emotional cues on the information-gathering willingness of paid knowledge users
Cao Y., Deng X.
PurposeThis study aims to explore the impact of emotional cues in knowledge product descriptions on users’ willingness to gather information. It specifically focuses on how different types of textual emotional cues, including heuristic cues like “emotional titles” and systematic cues like “emotional synopses,” influence users’ information-gathering willingness and examines the mediating role of emotional arousal in this process.Design/methodology/approachA conceptual model was developed by integrating the heuristic-systematic model with cue utilization theory. The experimental design employed knowledge product descriptions from the “Knowledge Column” section of the Zhihu platform. A controlled experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of varying emotional cues in these descriptions on participants’ willingness to gather information.FindingsThe study identified two types of emotional cues – heuristic cues, such as “emotional titles,” and systematic cues, such as “emotional synopses” – that significantly and positively influence users' information-gathering willingness. Additionally, emotional arousal was found to mediate the relationship between emotional cues and users’ willingness to gather information in the context of knowledge payments.Originality/valueThis study confirms that emotional cues in knowledge product descriptions, mediated by emotional arousal, can enhance the information-gathering willingness of knowledge payment users. The research deepens the theoretical exploration of information behavior among online knowledge payment users, providing valuable insights for knowledge producers on effectively leveraging emotional cues to attract potential customers as well as offering guidance for knowledge payment users in their information-gathering practices.
Q1

Motivating user engagement in online health Q&A communities: do contingent financial incentives matter?
He L., Huang Y., Li S., Zhou X.
PurposeUser engagement is critical for online health Q&A communities. Financial incentives, which vary across different communities and reward schemes, are expected to motivate such contribution behaviors. Even though financial incentives have been extensively examined in prior studies, the impact of newly designed contingent financial incentives of a new pay-for-answer reward scheme has not been empirically examined in any online health Q&A community. Given this research gap, our study aims to perform an exploratory investigation of the effects of contingent financial incentives on user engagement in terms of knowledge contribution and social interactions.Design/methodology/approachBased on expectancy-value theory and equity theory, a research model was developed to reflect the influences of contingent financial incentives on user engagement. A unique dataset was gathered from a large online health Q&A community utilizing this contingent financial incentive reward structure, and the Heckman selection model was applied using a two-step procedure to test these hypotheses. Possible endogeneity issues were also addressed in the robustness check.FindingsOur results demonstrate that the effect of contingent financial incentives on answer quantity and quality is quadratic. Additionally, our study reveals that this contingent financial incentive enhances both comment and emotional interactions among users.Originality/valueOur study enriches the literature on financial incentives, knowledge contribution and user engagement by revealing the nuanced effects of financial incentives within a novel pay-for-answer scheme. This study also offers significant implications for practitioners involved in online community incentive design.
Q1

Feedback from the younger generation on health information shared by their parents on WeChat: types, antecedents and consequences
Li X., Liu M., Song X., Zhu Q.
PurposeIn China, it is prevalent for parents to share health information on WeChat and receive feedback from their children. This study aims to investigate the feedback from younger generations regarding their parents’ health information sharing. It will examine the different types of feedback, explore the factors influencing it and analyze the outcomes that result from this feedback exchange.Design/methodology/approachThe empirical findings draw on the qualitative analysis using grounded theory. This study collects data from 34 participants (17 pairs of one young person and one parent) through in-depth interviews and WeChat chat records. Then, a theoretical model was developed through open, axial and selective coding.FindingsFeedback can be classified into five types: support, correction, perfunctoriness, ostracism and rejection as well as into “Affective-Behavioral-Cognitive” dimensions. Younger generations’ feedback types are influenced by a variety of factors, including information, emotion and individual and family-related factors. Each feedback type has distinct effects, such as altering older generations’ emotional and communication responses.Originality/valueThis pioneering study explores how younger generations in China perceive their parents’ health information sharing on social media. It highlights the importance of feedback in this context, providing actionable insights to enhance digital literacy among older adults, strengthen family bonds and enhance the spread of valuable and scientific health information online.
Q1

Does ChatGPT affect users’ continuous knowledge contributions in online Q&A communities?
Li G., Zhu M.X.
PurposeThis study aims to investigate the impact of ChatGPT on users’ continuous knowledge contributions in online question-and-answer (Q&A) communities based on social exchange theory and stimulus-organism-response (SOR) theory.Design/methodology/approachData were collected from a Chinese online Q&A community, and the difference-in-differences (DID) model was employed to verify the proposed hypotheses.FindingsThe results show that ChatGPT negatively impacts users’ continuous knowledge contributions in online Q&A communities, with variations observed across different knowledge domains.Originality/valueThis study is the first attempt to examine the impact of ChatGPT on users’ continuous knowledge contributions in online Q&A communities. The findings provide valuable insights for community managers to develop strategies for mitigating the effects of ChatGPT on online Q&A communities.
Q1

Promoting health behavioral intention through short videos: roles of audiovisual cross-modal correspondence in health communication
Xu Y., Jiang T., Hu X., Tian H.
PurposeHealth short videos are serving as a powerful tool for encouraging individuals to actively adopt healthier behaviors. The sensory cues applied in these videos can be useful for engaging peripheral processing and enhancing attitudes. While previous research has examined the effects of various single cues, this study features a pioneering attempt to explore the roles of audiovisual cross-modal correspondence, encompassing multisensory cues perceived through different modalities, in health communication.Design/methodology/approachA 2 (color: warm/cool) × 2 (music tempo: fast/slow) between-subjects experiment was conducted to observe 120 participants’ responses to a health short video promoting eye health that was created using four different combinations of background color and background music tempo.FindingsIt was found that the congruent color–tempo pairings, that is blue & slow and orange & fast, led to more positive attitudes toward the videos than the incongruent pairings, that is blue & fast and orange & slow. The effect of cross-modal correspondence on attitude was fully mediated by processing fluency, with gender acting as a moderator between the two variables. Furthermore, individuals’ attitudes toward a short video positively influenced their health behavioral intentions.Originality/valueThese findings not only lend support to the theoretical framework of “multisensory cues-fluency-attitude-intention” chain for persuasion purposes but also have practical implications for creating effective health short videos.
Top-100
Citing journals
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
|
Sociological Methods and Research
1695 citations, 1.91%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
1142 citations, 1.29%
|
|
PLoS ONE
956 citations, 1.08%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
768 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Structural Equation Modeling
732 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Social Science Research
528 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Sustainability
518 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Quality and Quantity
437 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Multivariate Behavioral Research
367 citations, 0.41%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
361 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Social Networks
360 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Social Science and Medicine
323 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Sociological Methodology
320 citations, 0.36%
|
|
American Journal of Sociology
292 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Journal of Business Research
275 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Scientific Reports
268 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Demography
251 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Social Indicators Research
231 citations, 0.26%
|
|
American Sociological Review
228 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology
204 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Current Psychology
200 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Annual Review of Sociology
182 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Educational and Psychological Measurement
181 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Psychometrika
178 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Criminology
178 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
177 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Advances in Life Course Research
169 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society
164 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Research in Social Stratification and Mobility
160 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice
146 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Personality and Individual Differences
145 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Sociological Quarterly
145 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Behavior Research Methods
145 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Public Opinion Quarterly
133 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Marriage and Family
131 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Quantitative Criminology
128 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Organizational Research Methods
128 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Social Forces
127 citations, 0.14%
|
|
BMC Public Health
127 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Management
126 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Social Science Computer Review
126 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Affective Disorders
120 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Academy of Management Journal
119 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Field Methods
116 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World
108 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Social Problems
106 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of the American Statistical Association
102 citations, 0.12%
|
|
BMS Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/ Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique
100 citations, 0.11%
|
|
European Sociological Review
100 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
97 citations, 0.11%
|
|
An Introduction to Regression Graphics
93 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Ecology and Evolution
90 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Criminal Justice
89 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Political Analysis
88 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Computers in Human Behavior
86 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
85 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Statistics in Medicine
85 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
84 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
84 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Mathematical Sociology
84 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Forest Ecology and Management
84 citations, 0.09%
|
|
BMJ Open
83 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie
82 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Assessment
82 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Vocational Behavior
80 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Science of the Total Environment
78 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Population Research and Policy Review
78 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
78 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Comparative Political Studies
77 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Family Issues
76 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Demographic Research
75 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Justice Quarterly
75 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Journal of Health and Social Behavior
75 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Industrial Marketing Management
71 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
71 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Quality of Life Research
70 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Organization Science
68 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Political Science Review
67 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Strategic Management Journal
67 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
67 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
65 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Biological Conservation
65 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Evaluation Review
64 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Work and Occupations
64 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Ecosphere
62 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Qualitative Sociology
62 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Children and Youth Services Review
62 citations, 0.07%
|
|
BMC Medical Research Methodology
62 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Sociological Perspectives
61 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Crime and Delinquency
61 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods
61 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Sociological Forum
60 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Journal of Public Health
60 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Journal of Experimental Education
60 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Journal of Marketing Research
59 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Psychological Reports
59 citations, 0.07%
|
|
British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
59 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Journal of Personality Assessment
58 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Journal of Organizational Behavior
58 citations, 0.07%
|
|
International Migration Review
58 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
Citing publishers
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
|
|
Elsevier
13991 citations, 15.79%
|
|
Springer Nature
12703 citations, 14.34%
|
|
SAGE
10936 citations, 12.34%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
10021 citations, 11.31%
|
|
Wiley
9958 citations, 11.24%
|
|
Emerald
3038 citations, 3.43%
|
|
Oxford University Press
2594 citations, 2.93%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
2522 citations, 2.85%
|
|
MDPI
2451 citations, 2.77%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
1606 citations, 1.81%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
1162 citations, 1.31%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1108 citations, 1.25%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
1033 citations, 1.17%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
690 citations, 0.78%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
521 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
502 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
438 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Annual Reviews
361 citations, 0.41%
|
|
IGI Global
342 citations, 0.39%
|
|
JMIR Publications
300 citations, 0.34%
|
|
BMJ
294 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
270 citations, 0.3%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
239 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
215 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Academy of Management
210 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
184 citations, 0.21%
|
|
SciELO
174 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
171 citations, 0.19%
|
|
American Educational Research Association
164 citations, 0.19%
|
|
The Royal Society
139 citations, 0.16%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
123 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
117 citations, 0.13%
|
|
IOP Publishing
115 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
112 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Institute of Mathematical Statistics
106 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Max-Planck Institute for Demographic Research/Max-Planck-institut fur Demografische Forschung
96 citations, 0.11%
|
|
American Marketing Association
90 citations, 0.1%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
83 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Public Health Association
77 citations, 0.09%
|
|
World Scientific
75 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
75 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
72 citations, 0.08%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
72 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Human Kinetics
71 citations, 0.08%
|
|
CAIRN
66 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Society for Sociological Science
61 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
59 citations, 0.07%
|
|
PeerJ
53 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Inter-Research Science Center
52 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Accounting Association
47 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Stata Press
47 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Behaviormetric Society of Japan
46 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
46 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Cornell University Press
45 citations, 0.05%
|
|
IOS Press
42 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Copernicus
42 citations, 0.05%
|
|
N T C Publications Ltd.
42 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Astronomical Society
41 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
35 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Guilford Publications
35 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
34 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Association for the Sociology of Religion
32 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Statistics Sweden
31 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
31 citations, 0.03%
|
|
S. Karger AG
29 citations, 0.03%
|
|
OpenEdition
29 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Editions Ophrys
28 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
28 citations, 0.03%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
27 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
27 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
27 citations, 0.03%
|
|
National Recreation and Park Association
26 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Economic Association
25 citations, 0.03%
|
|
MIT Press
24 citations, 0.03%
|
|
AOSIS
24 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
23 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Bristol University Press
23 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Brill
22 citations, 0.02%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
20 citations, 0.02%
|
|
F1000 Research
20 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
19 citations, 0.02%
|
|
AIP Publishing
19 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Cognizant, LLC
19 citations, 0.02%
|
|
16 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Society for Longitudinal and Life Course Studies
15 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Springer Publishing Company
13 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)
13 citations, 0.01%
|
|
EDP Sciences
12 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Escola Brasileira de Administracao Publica da Fundacao Getulio Vargas
12 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Wayne State University Press
12 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Carnegie Mellon University
12 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Society for Nutrition
12 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Institut fur Iberoamerika-Kunde
12 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Psychiatric Association Publishing
12 citations, 0.01%
|
|
IntechOpen
12 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Duke University Press
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Endocrine Society
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Korean Neuropsychiatric Association
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Speech Language Hearing Association
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
University of Michigan
70 publications, 4.78%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
54 publications, 3.69%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
49 publications, 3.34%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
49 publications, 3.34%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
48 publications, 3.28%
|
|
Harvard University
44 publications, 3%
|
|
University of Washington
30 publications, 2.05%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
29 publications, 1.98%
|
|
University of Arizona
28 publications, 1.91%
|
|
University of Chicago
27 publications, 1.84%
|
|
Stanford University
26 publications, 1.77%
|
|
Tilburg University
26 publications, 1.77%
|
|
Utrecht University
26 publications, 1.77%
|
|
Northwestern University
25 publications, 1.71%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
25 publications, 1.71%
|
|
Duke University
23 publications, 1.57%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
23 publications, 1.57%
|
|
Cornell University
22 publications, 1.5%
|
|
New York University
22 publications, 1.5%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
22 publications, 1.5%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
21 publications, 1.43%
|
|
Princeton University
20 publications, 1.37%
|
|
Ohio State University
20 publications, 1.37%
|
|
University of Oxford
19 publications, 1.3%
|
|
Columbia University
19 publications, 1.3%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
19 publications, 1.3%
|
|
University of Minnesota
19 publications, 1.3%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
18 publications, 1.23%
|
|
GESIS - Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences
18 publications, 1.23%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
17 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Carnegie Mellon University
15 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Yale University
15 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Cologne
15 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Aarhus University
14 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
14 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Washington State University
13 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University of Mannheim
13 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
12 publications, 0.82%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
11 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Michigan State University
11 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
11 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Groningen
11 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
11 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Essex
11 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
10 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Emory University
10 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
9 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Arizona State University
9 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Toronto
9 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Delaware
9 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Zurich
8 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Geneva
8 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Southern California
8 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
8 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Dartmouth College
8 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Purdue University
8 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
7 publications, 0.48%
|
|
ETH Zurich
7 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Cambridge
7 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
7 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
7 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
7 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Justus Liebig University Giessen
7 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Brown University
7 publications, 0.48%
|
|
York University
7 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Granada
7 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Florida
7 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
7 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Florida State University
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Melbourne
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
North Carolina State University
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Colorado State University
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of California, Davis
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Northeastern University
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Virginia Commonwealth University
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Texas A&M University – Kingsville
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Connecticut
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
National Institute of Mental Health
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Uppsala University
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Linköping University
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Australian National University
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Boston University
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Virginia Tech
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of British Columbia
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Goethe University Frankfurt
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Leiden University
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Konstanz
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
German Institute for Economic Research
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Ghent University
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Stockholm University
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Bern
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Lausanne
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
|
|
New York University
10 publications, 5.38%
|
|
GESIS - Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences
10 publications, 5.38%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
8 publications, 4.3%
|
|
Harvard University
7 publications, 3.76%
|
|
Tilburg University
7 publications, 3.76%
|
|
Princeton University
6 publications, 3.23%
|
|
University of Chicago
6 publications, 3.23%
|
|
Utrecht University
6 publications, 3.23%
|
|
University of Oxford
5 publications, 2.69%
|
|
University of Cologne
5 publications, 2.69%
|
|
University of Zurich
4 publications, 2.15%
|
|
Aarhus University
4 publications, 2.15%
|
|
Cornell University
4 publications, 2.15%
|
|
Stanford University
4 publications, 2.15%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
4 publications, 2.15%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
4 publications, 2.15%
|
|
University of Michigan
4 publications, 2.15%
|
|
University of Mannheim
4 publications, 2.15%
|
|
Emory University
4 publications, 2.15%
|
|
Ghent University
3 publications, 1.61%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
3 publications, 1.61%
|
|
University of Bergen
3 publications, 1.61%
|
|
Columbia University
3 publications, 1.61%
|
|
Northwestern University
3 publications, 1.61%
|
|
University of Washington
3 publications, 1.61%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
3 publications, 1.61%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
3 publications, 1.61%
|
|
University of British Columbia
3 publications, 1.61%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
3 publications, 1.61%
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Tübingen
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Peking University
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Yale University
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Glasgow
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Hamburg University
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Duisburg-Essen
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Goethe University Frankfurt
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Leiden University
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Purdue University
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Leuphana University of Lüneburg
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Erfurt
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Western University
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Kentucky
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Essex
2 publications, 1.08%
|
|
New York University Abu Dhabi
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Quaid-i-Azam University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Fudan University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Cyprus
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Gulf University for Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Uppsala University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Stockholm University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Linköping University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Technische Universität Dresden
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Geneva
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Australian National University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Neuchâtel
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Milan
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Université Catholique de Louvain
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University College London
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Warwick
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Lucerne
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Cambridge
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Oslo Metropolitan University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Cagliari
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Manchester Metropolitan University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Manchester
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Nottingham
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Southern California
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Michigan State University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Carnegie Mellon University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Perugia
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Stavanger
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Florence
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Pavia
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Calabria
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
School for Advanced Studies Lucca
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
European University Institute
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Victoria University of Wellington
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Queensland
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
University of Wollongong
1 publication, 0.54%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
|
USA
|
USA, 984, 67.17%
USA
984 publications, 67.17%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 126, 8.6%
Germany
126 publications, 8.6%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 100, 6.83%
Netherlands
100 publications, 6.83%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 91, 6.21%
United Kingdom
91 publications, 6.21%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 47, 3.21%
Canada
47 publications, 3.21%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 36, 2.46%
Switzerland
36 publications, 2.46%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 28, 1.91%
Denmark
28 publications, 1.91%
|
China
|
China, 25, 1.71%
China
25 publications, 1.71%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 25, 1.71%
Italy
25 publications, 1.71%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 24, 1.64%
Australia
24 publications, 1.64%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 23, 1.57%
Spain
23 publications, 1.57%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 16, 1.09%
Sweden
16 publications, 1.09%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 15, 1.02%
Belgium
15 publications, 1.02%
|
France
|
France, 13, 0.89%
France
13 publications, 0.89%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 12, 0.82%
Israel
12 publications, 0.82%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 9, 0.61%
Norway
9 publications, 0.61%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 8, 0.55%
Republic of Korea
8 publications, 0.55%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 7, 0.48%
Poland
7 publications, 0.48%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 6, 0.41%
Mexico
6 publications, 0.41%
|
India
|
India, 5, 0.34%
India
5 publications, 0.34%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 5, 0.34%
Japan
5 publications, 0.34%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 4, 0.27%
Austria
4 publications, 0.27%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 4, 0.27%
New Zealand
4 publications, 0.27%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 3, 0.2%
Russia
3 publications, 0.2%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 3, 0.2%
Hungary
3 publications, 0.2%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 3, 0.2%
Chile
3 publications, 0.2%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 2, 0.14%
Portugal
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 2, 0.14%
Brazil
2 publications, 0.14%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 2, 0.14%
UAE
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 2, 0.14%
Pakistan
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 2, 0.14%
Singapore
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 2, 0.14%
Slovenia
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Benin
|
Benin, 1, 0.07%
Benin
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 1, 0.07%
Zambia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.07%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.07%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.07%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 1, 0.07%
Kenya
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.07%
Cyprus
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.07%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.07%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.07%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Rwanda
|
Rwanda, 1, 0.07%
Rwanda
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.07%
Romania
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.07%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 1, 0.07%
Uganda
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.07%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.07%
Finland
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Montenegro
|
Montenegro, 1, 0.07%
Montenegro
1 publication, 0.07%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.07%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Show all (20 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
|
USA
|
USA, 91, 48.92%
USA
91 publications, 48.92%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 42, 22.58%
Germany
42 publications, 22.58%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 23, 12.37%
United Kingdom
23 publications, 12.37%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 19, 10.22%
Netherlands
19 publications, 10.22%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 11, 5.91%
Canada
11 publications, 5.91%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 9, 4.84%
Denmark
9 publications, 4.84%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 8, 4.3%
Italy
8 publications, 4.3%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 8, 4.3%
Switzerland
8 publications, 4.3%
|
China
|
China, 7, 3.76%
China
7 publications, 3.76%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 7, 3.76%
Australia
7 publications, 3.76%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 5, 2.69%
Belgium
5 publications, 2.69%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 4, 2.15%
Norway
4 publications, 2.15%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 3, 1.61%
Austria
3 publications, 1.61%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 3, 1.61%
Spain
3 publications, 1.61%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 2, 1.08%
Russia
2 publications, 1.08%
|
France
|
France, 2, 1.08%
France
2 publications, 1.08%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 2, 1.08%
Brazil
2 publications, 1.08%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 2, 1.08%
Sweden
2 publications, 1.08%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.54%
Israel
1 publication, 0.54%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.54%
Cyprus
1 publication, 0.54%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.54%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.54%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.54%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.54%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.54%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.54%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 1, 0.54%
New Zealand
1 publication, 0.54%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.54%
UAE
1 publication, 0.54%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.54%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.54%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.54%
Poland
1 publication, 0.54%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 0.54%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 0.54%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.54%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.54%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.54%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.54%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.54%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.54%
|
Show all (1 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
1 profile journal article
Barone Carlo
54 publications,
1 035 citations
h-index: 18