том 30 издание 2 страницы 162-173

Differences in Rat Models Used in Routine Toxicity Studies

Klaus Weber 1
Tanja Razinger 2
Jerry F Hardisty 3
Peter Mann 4
Kellie C Martel 5
Emily A Frische 5
Kai Blumbach 2
Stephen Hillen 6
Seungwoo Song 7
Takayuki Anzai 8
Hans Jörg Chevalier 1
1
 
AnaPath GmbH, Buchsweg 56, 4625 Oberbuchsiten, Switzerland
2
 
Harlan Laboratories Ltd, Zelgliweg 1, 4452 Itingen, Switzerland
3
 
EPL Experimental Pathology Laboratories Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
4
 
EPL Experimental Pathology Laboratories Inc., Seattle, WA, USA
5
 
Harlan Laboratories Ltd, 8520 Allison Pointe Blvd, Indianapolis, IN, USA
6
 
Harlan Laboratories Ltd, Harlan Laboratories France Ltd, Avenue des Portes Occitanes, 03800 Gannat, France
Тип публикацииJournal Article
Дата публикации2011-02-07
scimago Q3
wos Q4
БС3
SJR0.415
CiteScore2.2
Impact factor1.0
ISSN10915818, 1092874X
Toxicology
Краткое описание

The discussion on whether the Sprague Dawley (SD), the Fischer F344, or the Hannover Wistar rat is the most appropriate model for toxicity studies in rodents is ongoing. A substantial quantity of data on these strains concerning their source, diet, and housing conditions have been published. Generally, before starting a toxicology program in rodents, it should be taken into account that oncogenicity studies will be required for the majority of compounds successfully completing development. Survival, body weight development, incidence, type, time of onset of age-dependent lesions and neoplasms, as well as some special considerations of the rat model selected may be decisive. Therefore, an understanding of the historical background data is essential. These aspects demonstrate why the use of a specific rat model should be carefully considered at the beginning of the toxicology program.

Найдено 
Найдено 

Топ-30

Журналы

1
2
3
4
5
6
Toxicologic Pathology
6 публикаций, 9.38%
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
4 публикации, 6.25%
Journal of Toxicologic Pathology
3 публикации, 4.69%
International Journal of Toxicology
2 публикации, 3.13%
Journal of Applied Toxicology
2 публикации, 3.13%
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
1 публикация, 1.56%
Human and Experimental Toxicology
1 публикация, 1.56%
Toxicology Research and Application
1 публикация, 1.56%
Frontiers in Immunology
1 публикация, 1.56%
Frontiers in Genetics
1 публикация, 1.56%
Genes and Environment
1 публикация, 1.56%
Archives of Toxicology
1 публикация, 1.56%
Current Research in Toxicology
1 публикация, 1.56%
PLoS Genetics
1 публикация, 1.56%
Current Opinion in Toxicology
1 публикация, 1.56%
Reproductive Toxicology
1 публикация, 1.56%
Food and Chemical Toxicology
1 публикация, 1.56%
Toxicology Letters
1 публикация, 1.56%
Veterinary Record
1 публикация, 1.56%
Congenital Anomalies
1 публикация, 1.56%
Molecular and Integrative Toxicology
1 публикация, 1.56%
Inhalation Toxicology
1 публикация, 1.56%
Journal of Toxicological Sciences
1 публикация, 1.56%
Xenobiotica
1 публикация, 1.56%
Frontiers in Toxicology
1 публикация, 1.56%
Science of the Total Environment
1 публикация, 1.56%
Mendeleev Communications
1 публикация, 1.56%
Journal of Xenobiotics
1 публикация, 1.56%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
1 публикация, 1.56%
1
2
3
4
5
6

Издатели

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Elsevier
18 публикаций, 28.13%
SAGE
10 публикаций, 15.63%
Springer Nature
7 публикаций, 10.94%
Wiley
6 публикаций, 9.38%
Frontiers Media S.A.
3 публикации, 4.69%
Taylor & Francis
3 публикации, 4.69%
The Japanese Society of Toxicologic Pathology
3 публикации, 4.69%
MDPI
2 публикации, 3.13%
Society of Nuclear Medicine
1 публикация, 1.56%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 публикация, 1.56%
British Veterinary Association
1 публикация, 1.56%
Japanese Society of Toxicology
1 публикация, 1.56%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1 публикация, 1.56%
OOO Zhurnal "Mendeleevskie Soobshcheniya"
1 публикация, 1.56%
ABEI Journal
1 публикация, 1.56%
Japanese Association for Laboratory Animal Science
1 публикация, 1.56%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
  • Мы не учитываем публикации, у которых нет DOI.
  • Статистика публикаций обновляется еженедельно.

Вы ученый?

Создайте профиль, чтобы получать персональные рекомендации коллег, конференций и новых статей.
Метрики
64
Поделиться
Цитировать
ГОСТ |
Цитировать
Weber K. et al. Differences in Rat Models Used in Routine Toxicity Studies // International Journal of Toxicology. 2011. Vol. 30. No. 2. pp. 162-173.
ГОСТ со всеми авторами (до 50) Скопировать
Weber K., Razinger T., Hardisty J. F., Mann P., Martel K. C., Frische E. A., Blumbach K., Hillen S., Song S., Anzai T., Chevalier H. J. Differences in Rat Models Used in Routine Toxicity Studies // International Journal of Toxicology. 2011. Vol. 30. No. 2. pp. 162-173.
RIS |
Цитировать
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1177/1091581810391818
UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/1091581810391818
TI - Differences in Rat Models Used in Routine Toxicity Studies
T2 - International Journal of Toxicology
AU - Weber, Klaus
AU - Razinger, Tanja
AU - Hardisty, Jerry F
AU - Mann, Peter
AU - Martel, Kellie C
AU - Frische, Emily A
AU - Blumbach, Kai
AU - Hillen, Stephen
AU - Song, Seungwoo
AU - Anzai, Takayuki
AU - Chevalier, Hans Jörg
PY - 2011
DA - 2011/02/07
PB - SAGE
SP - 162-173
IS - 2
VL - 30
PMID - 21300768
SN - 1091-5818
SN - 1092-874X
ER -
BibTex |
Цитировать
BibTex (до 50 авторов) Скопировать
@article{2011_Weber,
author = {Klaus Weber and Tanja Razinger and Jerry F Hardisty and Peter Mann and Kellie C Martel and Emily A Frische and Kai Blumbach and Stephen Hillen and Seungwoo Song and Takayuki Anzai and Hans Jörg Chevalier},
title = {Differences in Rat Models Used in Routine Toxicity Studies},
journal = {International Journal of Toxicology},
year = {2011},
volume = {30},
publisher = {SAGE},
month = {feb},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/1091581810391818},
number = {2},
pages = {162--173},
doi = {10.1177/1091581810391818}
}
MLA
Цитировать
Weber, Klaus, et al. “Differences in Rat Models Used in Routine Toxicity Studies.” International Journal of Toxicology, vol. 30, no. 2, Feb. 2011, pp. 162-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091581810391818.