Journal of Toxicologic Pathology

Background: The relationship between albumin-corrected anion gap (ACAG) and in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with COPD remains unclear. Objective: This study investigated the association between ACAG levels and the risk of in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with COPD. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Methods: This study uses data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) database. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal threshold for ACAG, and participants were divided into two categories based on this threshold. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. We employed univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses and Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival curves to assess the relationship between ACAG and the risk of in-hospital mortality. Moreover, subgroup analyses were conducted. Results: A total of 2121 patients (54.7% male) were enrolled in the study. The in-hospital mortality rate was 18.9%. In patients with elevated ACAG levels, the in-hospital mortality rate was significantly higher than in those with lower ACAG levels (27.7% vs 11.3%, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that even after mitigating for potential confounders, patients in the high ACAG group had significantly greater odds of in-hospital mortality across all models (Model I: OR = 3.000, 95% CI: 2.383–3.777, p < 0.001; Model II: OR = 3.021, 95% CI: 2.397–3.808, p < 0.001; Model III: OR = 1.916, 95% CI: 1.458–2.519, p < 0.001). Patients with elevated ACAG levels have more than twice the risk of in-hospital mortality compared to those with lower levels (hazard ratio (HR): 2.1277, 95% CI: 1.7490–2.5884). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that elevated ACAG levels are strongly associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality in critically ill COPD patients, suggesting that ACAG could serve as a potential predictor of adverse outcomes in this patient population.

Background: REMIT is the first real-world study of mepolizumab effectiveness in patients with severe asthma (SA) in Taiwan. Objectives: The primary objective evaluated changes in clinically significant exacerbations (CSEs; defined as use of oral corticosteroids (OCS) or emergency department (ED) visits and/or hospitalizations) in the 12 months pre- and post-mepolizumab treatment. Secondary objectives assessed changes in the number of CSEs requiring ED visits/hospitalizations and daily maintenance OCS (mOCS) dosage 12 months pre- and post-mepolizumab treatment. Three- and four-component clinical remissions were analyzed based on OCS-free, exacerbation-free, and asthma control (± stability in lung function). Design: REMIT was a retrospective, observational, self-controlled study analyzing patients in Taiwan with SA who were newly prescribed subcutaneous mepolizumab 100 mg Q4W. Methods: Data were extracted from records of 15 medical centers in Taiwan for patients indexed between November 1, 2018 and October 31, 2020. Results: A total of 170 patients were included: mean age at index date, 58.7 years; 53.5% female; 100% Chinese; 7.1% with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, 1.8% with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, 1.2% with hypereosinophilic syndrome; and 55.7% with blood eosinophil count >300/µL. Pre-treatment, 71.2% had ⩾2 exacerbations, and 28.7% were on mOCS; 75.3% had no prior biologic treatment, and 24.7% had switched from other biologics. Most patients (80.0%) completed ⩾10 mepolizumab doses. Following the first mepolizumab administration (index date), CSEs reduced by 46.0% (rate ratio (RR): 0.545, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.418–0.710; p < 0.0001) in the 12 months post-index. Exacerbations requiring ED visits/hospitalization reduced by 46.9% (RR: 0.531, 95% CI: 0.349–0.808; p = 0.0031). Median mOCS dose reduced by 100% by end of study and 81.8% of patients discontinued mOCS post-treatment. After 1 year of mepolizumab treatment, 28% and 23% patients achieved three- and four-component clinical remission, respectively. Conclusion: Mepolizumab use in a patient population in Taiwan with SA significantly reduced CSEs and mOCS use in routine clinical practice.

Background: Joubert syndrome (JS) is an autosomal recessive disorder with a distinctive mid-hindbrain malformation known as the “molar tooth sign” which involves the breathing control center and its connections with other structures. Literature has reported significant respiratory abnormalities which included hyperpnea interspersed with apneic episodes during wakefulness. Larger-scale studies looking at polysomnographic findings or subjective reports of sleep problems in this population have not yet been published. Objectives: The primary objectives were (1) compare a large group of children with JS and their unaffected siblings for caregiver-reported sleep difficulties. Secondary objectives were (1) present new polysomnography (PSG) data on our JS cohort; (2) review sleep disordered breathing (SDB) in other rare congenital hindbrain anatomic abnormalities. Design: We conducted a cross-sectional study on a cohort of 109 families affected by JS. Methods: Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) and the Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) along with general medical health information focused on respiratory and sleep problems were mailed to all patients and families. Caregivers were asked to complete the survey for both children with JS and unaffected siblings, if any. Baseline diagnostic PSG was retrospectively reviewed for those with available studies, and the sleep parameters were compared to a referent cohort. Results: Study participants with JS were older than their unaffected siblings ( p = 0.02). Genetic mutations were available for 41 out of 118 individuals, with the most common mutation being MKS3 (31.4%). Patients with JS had higher scores in the PSQ compared to their unaffected siblings ( p < 0.001). PSG data showed severe SDB with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of 23 ± 15 events/h in patients with JS. Events were primarily obstructive (obstructive AHI 18 ± 15 events/h vs central AHI 4 ± 4 events/h). Abnormal sleep architecture with increased arousal indices, decreased efficiency, and more time awake and in light sleep or wakefulness when compared to the referent data. Conclusion: SDB is common and severe in patients with JS, and the significantly greater obstructive component reported in this cohort makes it necessary to perform complete PSG studies to address or prevent clinical manifestations in this at-risk population. PSQ could represent a viable method to screen for SDB in JS.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is often regarded as the archetypal progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD). The term “progressive pulmonary fibrosis” (PPF) generally describes progressive lung fibrosis in an individual with an ILD other than IPF. Both IPF and PPF are associated with loss of lung function, worsening dyspnea and quality of life, and premature death. Current treatments slow the decline in lung function but have side effects that may deter the initiation or continuation of treatment. There remains a high unmet need for additional therapies that can be used alone or in combination with current therapies to preserve lung function in patients with IPF and PPF. Phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) is an enzyme involved in the regulation of inflammatory processes. Pre-clinical studies have shown that preferential inhibition of PDE4B has anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effects and a lower potential for gastrointestinal adverse events than pan-PDE4 inhibition. The preferential PDE4B inhibitor nerandomilast demonstrated efficacy in preserving lung function in a phase II trial in patients with IPF and is under investigation in phase III trials as a treatment for IPF and PPF.

Background: With the rise of targeted treatments for asthma, treatment with omalizumab is a new option. Objectives: To assess the improvement of pulmonary function with additional omalizumab treatment in patients (⩾6 years old) with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma. Data sources and methods: Observational studies of randomized controlled trials of add-on omalizumab for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma, published from the establishment till August 2022, were retrieved from WAN FANG DATA, PubMed, CNKI, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. Data extraction and quality evaluation were performed on the literature that met the inclusion criteria, using RevMan 5.3 to analyze the data. Results: A total of 11 randomized controlled clinical trials were included, involving a total of 3578 patients with asthma, 1856 patients in the omalizumab group, and 1722 patients in the control group. The improvement in Forced expiratory volume in 1 s as a percentage of predicted normal and Forced expiratory volume in 1 s was more pronounced in the omalizumab-treated group [MD = 3.91, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.89–5.94, p = 0.0002; MD = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.05–0.13, p < 0.0001], while the improvement in Morning Peak expiratory flow rate was not statistically different between the two groups (MD = 3.64, 95% CI: −22.17–29.45, p = 0.78). Conclusion: Additional omalizumab treatment showed some improvement in lung function in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma. Trial registration: PROSPERO ID:CRD42022378498.

Background: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and conventional oxygen therapy (COT) are important respiratory support strategies for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. However, the results are conflicting for the risk of intubation with HFNC as compared to COT. Objectives: We systematically synthesized the outcomes of HFNC relative to COT in COVID-19 patients with AHRF and evaluated these outcomes in relevant subpopulations. Design: This study was designed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data sources and methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, medRxiv, BioRxiv, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials and observational studies that compared the efficacy of HFNC with COT in patients with COVID-19-related AHRF. Primary outcomes were intubation rate and mortality rate. Secondary outcomes were the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2), respiratory rate, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and days free from invasive mechanical ventilation. Results: In total, 20 studies with 5732 patients were included. We found a decreased risk of requiring intubation in HFNC compared to COT [odds ratio (OR) = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46–0.82, p = 0.0009, I2 = 75%]. Similarly, we found HFNC was associated with lower risk of intubation rate compared to COT in the subgroup of patients with baseline PaO2/FiO2 < 200 mmHg (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.55–0.86, p = 0.0007, I2 = 45%), and who were in ICU settings at enrollment (OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.38–0.85, p = 0.005, I2 = 80%). HFNC was associated with an improvement of PaO2/FiO2 and respiratory rate compared to COT. The use of HFNC compared to COT did not reduce the mortality rate, days free from invasive mechanical ventilation, hospital length of stay, or ICU length of stay. Conclusion: Compared to COT, HFNC may decrease the need for tracheal intubation in patients with COVID-19-related AHRF, particularly among patients with baseline PaO2/FiO2 < 200 mmHg and those in ICU settings. Trial registration: This systematic review and meta-analysis protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (no. CRD42022339072).

Background: Gut microbiota assumes an essential role in the development and progression of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), a gut microbiota-dependent metabolite, is correlated with the prognosis of patients with PAH. However, the correlation between changes in TMAO (ΔTMAO) and the prognosis of PAH remains elusive. Objectives: To investigate the association between ΔTMAO and prognosis of PAH, and explore whether dynamic assessment of TMAO level was superior to measurement at a single time point in predicting prognosis. Design: Single-center cohort study. Methods: Consecutive patients diagnosed with PAH and had at least two TMAO measurements taken from May 2019 to June 2020 were eligible. The outcome events of this study were defined as adverse clinical events. Results: A total of 117 patients with PAH who had two TMAO measurements and follow-up were included in this study. Patients with ΔTMAO ⩾1.082 μmol/L had over four times increased risk of adverse clinical events than their counterparts after adjusting for confounders [hazard ratio (HR) 4.050, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.468–11.174; p = 0.007]. Patients with constant high TMAO levels at both time points had the highest risk of adverse clinical events compared with patients with constant low TMAO levels (HR 3.717, 95% CI: 1.627–8.492; p = 0.002). ΔTMAO was also associated with changes in parameters reflecting PAH severity ( p < 0.05). Conclusion: Changes in TMAO were independently correlated with prognosis in patients with PAH, irrespective of baseline level of TMAO. ΔTMAO also correlated with alteration in disease severity. Repeated assessment of TMAO level contributes to better identification of patients with increased risk of adverse clinical events.

Background: Early diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is of great significance. Current prediction models are not simple enough to be widely used in heavy clinical work. Objectives: We aimed to develop a simple and efficient clinical prediction scoring system to distinguish MPE from benign pleural effusion (BPE). Design: This retrospective study involved patients with MPE or BPE who were admitted in West China Hospital from December 2010 to September 2016. Methods: Patients were divided into training, testing, and validation set. Prediction model was developed from training set and modified to a scoring system. The diagnostic efficacy and clinical benefits of the scoring system were estimated in all three sets. Results: Finally, 598 cases of MPE and 1094 cases of BPE were included. Serum neuron-specific enolase, serum cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1), pleural carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and ratio of pleural CEA to serum CEA were selected to establish the prediction models in training set, which were modified to the scoring system with scores of 6, 8, 10, and 9 points, respectively. Patients with scores >12 points have high MPE risk while ⩽12 points have low MPE risk. The scoring system has a high predictive value and good clinical benefits to differentiate MPE from BPE or lung-specific MPE from BPE. Conclusion: This study developed a simple clinical prediction scoring system and was proven to have good clinical benefits, and it may help clinicians to separate MPE from BPE.

Background: The prognosis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is poor. A timely and accurate diagnosis is the prerequisite for managing MPE patients. Carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA72-4) is a diagnostic tool for MPE. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of pleural fluid CA72-4 for MPE. Design: A prospective, preregistered, and double-blind diagnostic test accuracy study. Methods: We prospectively enrolled participants with undiagnosed pleural effusions from two centers in China (Hohhot and Changshu). CA72-4 concentration in pleural fluid was measured by electrochemiluminescence. Its diagnostic accuracy for MPE was evaluated by a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The net benefit of CA72-4 was determined by a decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: In all, 153 participants were enrolled in the Hohhot cohort, and 58 were enrolled in the Changshu cohort. In both cohorts, MPE patients had significantly higher CA72-4 levels than benign pleural effusion (BPE) patients. At a cutoff value of 8 U/mL, pleural fluid CA72-4 had a sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.46, 1.00, and 0.79, respectively, in the Hohhot cohort. In the Changshu cohort, CA72-4 had a sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 0.27, 0.94, and 0.86, respectively. DCA revealed the relatively high net benefit of CA72-4 determination. In patients with negative cytology, the AUC of CA72-4 was 0.67. Conclusion: Pleural fluid CA72-4 helps differentiate MPE and BPE in patients with undiagnosed pleural effusions.

Background: The current available diagnostic criteria for gastroesophageal reflux-related chronic cough (GERC) dominated by non-acid reflux is imperfect. The post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index (PSPWI) is a parameter reflecting esophageal clearance function. Objectives: This study aims to investigate its diagnostic value for non-acid GERC. Design: This study sought to compare the diagnostic value of PSPWI in different types of GERC, particularly non-acid GERC, and explore the clinical significance of PSPWI in the diagnosis of non-acid GERC through diagnostic experiments. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed based on 223 patients with suspected GERC who underwent multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH) in the outpatient clinic of our department from August 2016 to June 2021. Their clinical information, laboratory test results, and treatment responses were assessed and the underlying etiologies of chronic cough were categorized. The predictive value of the PSPWI in diagnosing different types of GERC, especially non-acid GERC, was analyzed and compared. Results: A total of 195 patients with chronic cough who met the inclusion criteria underwent MII-pH monitoring. 143 patients had a definitive diagnosis of GERC, including 98 with acid GERC and 45 with non-acid GERC. The diagnostic value of PSPWI alone was moderate for GERC with an area under the working curve (AUC) 0.760, but poor for non-acid GERC with an AUC of 0.569. However, PSPWI < 39.8% combining with acid exposure time (AET) ⩽ 6.2% demonstrated a moderate diagnostic value for non-acid GERC, with an AUC of 0.722. When PSPWI < 39.8% combined with a non-acid reflux ratio >68.75%, the diagnostic value for non-acid GERC was improved (AUCROC = 0.80 versus AUCROC = 0.722, p < 0.05), which was significantly superior to non-acid symptom index (AUCROC = 0.804 versus AUCROC = 0.550, p < 0.05) and non-acid symptom association probability (AUCROC = 0.804 versus AUCROC = 0.571, p < 0.05). Conclusion: PSPWI < 39.8% and AET ⩽ 6.2% have demonstrated good diagnostic value for non-acid GERC. The diagnostic value was further improved when combined with non-acid reflux ratio >68.75%.

Background: Empiric therapy with multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH) has been used for the initial treatment of gastroesophageal reflux-induced chronic cough (GERC). However, an algorithm based on the gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GerdQ) has the potential to achieve a simple, structured, and effective treatment approach for patients with GERC. Objectives: This study compared the efficacy of anti-reflux therapy based on GerdQ (new structured pathway, NSP) with medical treatment after MII-pH examination (ordinary clinical pathway, OCP) in the management of GERC. Design: For the NSP, we adapted the GerdQ score to establish the basis for a treatment algorithm. For the OCP, treatment was determined using the MII-pH examination results. Methods: The non-inferiority (NI) hypothesis was used to evaluate NSP versus OCP. Results: Overall, the NSP and OCP-based therapeutic algorithms have similar efficacy for GERC [NI analysis: 95% confidence interval (CI), −4.97 to 17.73, p = 0.009; superiority analysis: p = 0.420]. Moreover, the cough symptom scores and cough threshold improved faster in the NSP group than in the OCP group at week 8 ( p < 0.05). In the subgroup analyses using the GerdQ and GerdQ impact scale (GIS) scores, patients with low-likelihood GERC (GerdQ < 8) were more likely to benefit from OCP (NI analysis: 95% CI, −19.73 to 18.02, p = 0.213). On the other hand, in patients with high-likelihood and low-reflux impact GERC patients (GerdQ > 8 and GIS < 4), the NSP arm was not inferior to the standard treatment of OCP (NI analysis: 95% CI, −8.85 to 28.21%, p = 0.04; superiority analysis: p = 0.339), indicating that GerdQ- and GIS-guided diagnosis and management of patients with GERC could be an alternative to MII-pH management, especially in settings with reduced medical resources. Conclusions: The use of the GerdQ algorithm should be considered when handling patients with GERC in the primary care setting. Trial registration: This research was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR-ODT-12001899).

Background: Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) unresponsive to medical therapy often require lung transplantation (LTx), which prolongs quality of life and survival. Ideal timing for referral for LTx remains challenging, with late referral associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Among other criteria, patients with ILD should be considered for LTx if forced vital capacity (FVC) is less than 80% or diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) is less than 40%. However, data on referral rates are lacking. Objectives: To evaluate referral rates for LTx based on pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and identify barriers associated with non-referral. Design: A single-center retrospective cohort study. Methods: The study consisted of ILD patients who performed PFT between 2014 and 2020. Patients with FVC < 80% or a DLCO < 40% were included in the study. Patients with absolute contraindications to LTx were excluded. Referral rates were computed, and a comparison was made between referred and non-referred subjects. Results: Out of 114 ILD patients meeting criteria for referral to LTx, 35 were referred (30.7%), and 7 proceeded to undergo LTx. Median time from PFT to referral for assessment was 255 days [interquartile range (IQR) 35–1077]. Median time from referral to LTx was 89 days (IQR 59–143). Referred patients were younger ( p = 0.003), had lower FVC ( p < 0.001), DLCO ( p < 0.001), and a higher rate of pulmonary hypertension ( p = 0.04). Relatively better PFT, and older age, were significantly associated with non-referral of patients. Conclusion: There is under-referral of ILD patients who are eligible for LTx, which is associated with severe disease and missed opportunities for LTx. Further research is required to validate these findings.

Background: Liver injury is the hallmark adverse reaction of endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA). Since the first drug, bosentan has been widely used in clinical practice, hepatotoxicity has been accompanied by the history of ERA. The new ERA has been proven to have a lower liver risk but the current research findings are inconsistent. ERA-based targeted drug combinations are commonly used in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension, where the risk of liver injury is difficult to estimate. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the correlation between ERA and different ERA combination regimens with liver injury in the real world. Design: This is a retrospective study using data from the Adverse Event Reporting System (Food and Drug Administration AERS, FAERS). Methods: The study used proportional imbalance and Bayesian analysis to mine FAERS data from January 2004 to December 2022 to determine the association of three ERAs with liver injury and to further mine the risk of liver injury due to the combination of ERAs with other targeted drugs. In addition, we analyzed the onset time, mortality, and hospitalization rate of liver injury caused by different ERA combination regimens. Results: We screened out 3581 ERA-related liver injury events, of which bosentan (59.82%) had the largest number of cases. The patients with liver injury were mainly female (60.63%), and the age was concentrated between 61 and 75 years (26.75%). According to different signal mining methods, reporting odds ratio (ROR; 3.38, 95% confidence interval = 3.23–3.53), proportional reporting ratio (PRR; 3.22, χ2 = 37.84), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN; 1.68, 95% confidence interval = 1.61), multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS; 3.21, 95% confidence interval = 3.09), bosentan had the strongest association with liver injury compared to ambrisentan and macitentan. Furthermore, bosentan + sildenafil [ROR (2.52, 95% confidence interval = 2.23–2.84), PRR (2.44, χ2 = 15.92), BCPNN (1.29, 95% confidence interval = 1.14), MGPS (2.44, 95% confidence interval = 2.21)], bosentan + epoprostenol [ROR (5.39, 95% confidence interval = 4.29–6.77), PRR (4.94, χ2 = 65.18), BCPNN (2.30, 95% confidence interval = 1.83), MGPS (4.94, 95% confidence interval = 4.08)], bosentan + iloprost [ROR (2.70, 95% confidence interval = 2.11–3.45), PRR (2.61, χ2 = 31.03), BCPNN (1.38, 95% confidence interval = 1.08), MGPS (2.61, 95% confidence interval = 2.12)] had a higher risk of liver injury caused by the three ERA combination regimens. The median time to onset of hepatotoxicity associated with all ERA combination regimens was 259 days (interquartile range: 58–716.5 days). Finally, the hospitalization rate for patients experiencing hepatotoxicity with ERA combination regimens was 47.86% and the mortality rate was 12.67%. Conclusion: By mining the FAERS, we analyzed and compared the risk of liver injury related to different ERA and ERA combination regimens, and the onset time and adverse reaction outcomes of all ERA combination regimens. According to the results of the study, bosentan had the highest risk of liver injury and the combination regimens bosentan + sildenafil, bosentan + epoprostenol, and bosentan + iloprost had a stronger risk of liver injury. From the early stages of treatment, we need to regularly monitor the liver function of patients, especially for females and the elderly, and discontinue the suspected drug as soon as the liver injury occurs.

Background: Chronic cough, defined as a cough lasting 8 or more weeks, affects up to 10% of adults. Refractory chronic cough (RCC) is a cough that is uncontrolled despite comprehensive investigation and treatment of comorbid conditions while unexplained chronic cough (UCC) is a cough with no identifiable cause despite extensive evaluation of comorbid conditions. RCC and UCC are often poorly controlled. Understanding individuals’ lived experience of the symptoms and impacts of these conditions may guide therapeutic strategies. Objectives: The primary objectives of this study were to assess respondents’ perceptions of the key symptoms of RCC and UCC and the impacts of RCC and UCC and their symptoms on well-being, health-related quality of life, work productivity, and social relationships. Design: Qualitative study. Methods: This study enrolled 30 adults with physician-diagnosed RCC or UCC. Two trained qualitative researchers conducted individual, in-depth telephone interviews using a semi-structured interview guide. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded, and systematically analyzed to identify content themes. Results: A total of 15 respondents with RCC and 15 with UCC were included in the study. Many respondents had RCC or UCC for a long duration (median 9 years, range: 0–24). Half of the respondents reported having a coughing episode at least once daily. Only 40% of respondents reported that medication had improved their symptoms. In over half of the respondents, RCC or UCC hindered communication, caused embarrassment, frustration, and worry, and lowered quality of life. Perceptions of meaningful treatment benefits in RCC or UCC varied widely across respondents. Conclusion: RCC and UCC remained poorly managed in many individuals and were associated with a wide range of symptoms and cough triggers that hindered daily activities and reduced emotional well-being. Understanding individuals’ lived experiences may inform the development of RCC and UCC therapeutic strategies.

What is this summary about? This summary describes the results of a clinical study called MANDALA that was published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2022. In the MANDALA study, researchers looked at a new asthma rescue inhaler that contains both albuterol and budesonide in a single inhaler (known as albuterol–budesonide, AIRSUPRA™). This summary describes the results for people aged 18 yearsand older who took part in the study.