Open Access
Open access
volume 22 issue 1 publication number 22

The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health

Sadrieh Hajesmaeel Gohari 1
Firoozeh Khordastan 2
Farhad Fatehi 3, 4
Hamidreza Samzadeh 5
Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy 6
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2022-01-27
scimago Q1
wos Q2
SJR1.041
CiteScore7.4
Impact factor3.8
ISSN14726947
Computer Science Applications
Health Policy
Health Informatics
Abstract
Various questionnaires are used for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health (mHealth) services. Using the best one to meet the needs of an mHealth study is a challenge for researchers. Therefore, this study aimed to review and determine the frequently used questionnaires for evaluating the mentioned outcomes of mHealth services. The PubMed database was searched for conducting this review in April 2021. Papers that used a referenced questionnaire to evaluate the satisfaction, usability, acceptance, or quality outcomes of mHealth were included. The first author’s name, year of publication, evaluation outcome, and evaluation questionnaire were extracted from relevant papers. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. In total, 247 papers were included in the study. Questionnaires were used for usability (40%), quality (34.5%), acceptance (8.5%), and satisfaction (4%) outcomes, respectively. System usability scale (36.5%), mobile application rating scale (35.5%), post study system usability questionnaire (6%), user mobile application rating scale (5%), technology acceptance model (4.5%), computer system usability questionnaire (2.5%), net promoter score (2%), health information technology usability evaluation scale (2%), the usefulness, satisfaction, and ease of use (1.5%), client satisfaction questionnaire (1.5%), unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (1.5%), questionnaire for user interaction satisfaction (1%), user experience questionnaire (1%), and after-scenario questionnaire (1%) were the most used questionnaires, respectively. Despite the existence of special questionnaires for evaluating several outcomes of mHealth, general questionnaires with fewer items and higher reliability have been used more frequently. Researchers should pay more attention to questionnaires with a goal-based design.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Digital Health
7 publications, 6.86%
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
6 publications, 5.88%
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
4 publications, 3.92%
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
3 publications, 2.94%
JMIR Human Factors
3 publications, 2.94%
JMIR Formative Research
3 publications, 2.94%
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
3 publications, 2.94%
Sustainability
2 publications, 1.96%
JMIR Aging
2 publications, 1.96%
Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
2 publications, 1.96%
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
2 publications, 1.96%
Electronics (Switzerland)
2 publications, 1.96%
Journal of Medical Internet Research
2 publications, 1.96%
Healthcare
2 publications, 1.96%
BMC Oral Health
2 publications, 1.96%
BioMed Research International
1 publication, 0.98%
PLOS Digital Health
1 publication, 0.98%
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
1 publication, 0.98%
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
1 publication, 0.98%
JAMIA Open
1 publication, 0.98%
Research square
1 publication, 0.98%
International Journal of Medical Informatics
1 publication, 0.98%
Progres en Urologie
1 publication, 0.98%
BMC Primary Care
1 publication, 0.98%
JMIR Research Protocols
1 publication, 0.98%
Frontiers in Psychology
1 publication, 0.98%
Frontiers in Health Services
1 publication, 0.98%
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
1 publication, 0.98%
Musculoskeletal Care
1 publication, 0.98%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Publishers

5
10
15
20
JMIR Publications
20 publications, 19.61%
Springer Nature
18 publications, 17.65%
MDPI
12 publications, 11.76%
SAGE
9 publications, 8.82%
Elsevier
7 publications, 6.86%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
7 publications, 6.86%
Frontiers Media S.A.
4 publications, 3.92%
Taylor & Francis
4 publications, 3.92%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
3 publications, 2.94%
Wiley
3 publications, 2.94%
Hindawi Limited
2 publications, 1.96%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2 publications, 1.96%
Mary Ann Liebert
2 publications, 1.96%
BMJ
2 publications, 1.96%
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 0.98%
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
1 publication, 0.98%
Korean Society of Adult Nursing
1 publication, 0.98%
Editura Economica
1 publication, 0.98%
F1000 Research
1 publication, 0.98%
Scientific Research Publishing
1 publication, 0.98%
5
10
15
20
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
102
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Hajesmaeel Gohari S. et al. The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health // BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2022. Vol. 22. No. 1. 22
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Hajesmaeel Gohari S., Khordastan F., Fatehi F., Samzadeh H., Bahaadinbeigy K. The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health // BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2022. Vol. 22. No. 1. 22
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1186/s12911-022-01764-2
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01764-2
TI - The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health
T2 - BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
AU - Hajesmaeel Gohari, Sadrieh
AU - Khordastan, Firoozeh
AU - Fatehi, Farhad
AU - Samzadeh, Hamidreza
AU - Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/01/27
PB - Springer Nature
IS - 1
VL - 22
PMID - 35081953
SN - 1472-6947
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2022_Hajesmaeel Gohari,
author = {Sadrieh Hajesmaeel Gohari and Firoozeh Khordastan and Farhad Fatehi and Hamidreza Samzadeh and Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy},
title = {The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health},
journal = {BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making},
year = {2022},
volume = {22},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {jan},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01764-2},
number = {1},
pages = {22},
doi = {10.1186/s12911-022-01764-2}
}