volume 219 issue Pt 19

Determinants of preferred ground clearance during swing phase of human walking

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2016-01-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR0.931
CiteScore5.3
Impact factor2.6
ISSN00220949, 14779145
PubMed ID:  27473435
Molecular Biology
Animal Science and Zoology
Physiology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Insect Science
Aquatic Science
Abstract

During each step of human walking, the swing foot passes close to the ground with a small but (usually) non-zero clearance. The foot can occasionally scuff against the ground, with some risk of stumbling or tripping. The risk might be mitigated simply by lifting the foot higher, but presumably at increased effort, of unknown amount. Perhaps the normally preferred ground clearance is a trade-off between competing costs, one for lifting the foot higher, and one for scuffing it. We tested this by measuring the metabolic energy cost of lifting and scuffing the foot, treating these apparently dissimilar behaviors as part of a single continuum, where scuffing is a form of negative foot lift. We measured young, healthy adults (N=9) lifting or scuffing the foot by various amounts mid-swing during treadmill walking, and observed substantial costs, each well capable of doubling the net metabolic rate for normal walking (gross cost minus that for standing). In relative terms, the cost for scuffing increased over twice as steeply as that for lifting. That relative difference means that the expected value of cost, which takes into account movement variability, occurs at a non-zero mean clearance, approximately matching the preferred clearance we observed. Energy cost alone is only a lower bound on the overall disadvantages of inadvertent ground contact, but it is sufficient to show how human behavior may be determined not only by the separate costs of different trade-offs, but also movement variability, which can influence the average cost actually experienced in practice.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
Scientific Reports
2 publications, 5.71%
Journal of Biomechanics
2 publications, 5.71%
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
2 publications, 5.71%
Journal of Experimental Biology
2 publications, 5.71%
Polar Biology
1 publication, 2.86%
Experimental Brain Research
1 publication, 2.86%
IEEE Transactions on Robotics
1 publication, 2.86%
IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics
1 publication, 2.86%
Military Medicine
1 publication, 2.86%
Journal of Kinesiology and Exercise Sciences
1 publication, 2.86%
Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference
1 publication, 2.86%
eLife
1 publication, 2.86%
Journal of Neuroscience
1 publication, 2.86%
IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering
1 publication, 2.86%
Journal of Human Evolution
1 publication, 2.86%
Clinical Biomechanics
1 publication, 2.86%
PLoS ONE
1 publication, 2.86%
Journal of Motor Behavior
1 publication, 2.86%
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
1 publication, 2.86%
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
1 publication, 2.86%
1
2

Publishers

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
8 publications, 22.86%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
8 publications, 22.86%
Springer Nature
5 publications, 14.29%
Elsevier
4 publications, 11.43%
The Company of Biologists
2 publications, 5.71%
Association of Military Surgeons of the US
1 publication, 2.86%
Index Copernicus
1 publication, 2.86%
eLife Sciences Publications
1 publication, 2.86%
Society for Neuroscience
1 publication, 2.86%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 2.86%
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 2.86%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
35
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Wu A. R., Kuo A. D. Determinants of preferred ground clearance during swing phase of human walking // Journal of Experimental Biology. 2016. Vol. 219. No. Pt 19.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Wu A. R., Kuo A. D. Determinants of preferred ground clearance during swing phase of human walking // Journal of Experimental Biology. 2016. Vol. 219. No. Pt 19.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1242/jeb.137356
UR - https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.137356
TI - Determinants of preferred ground clearance during swing phase of human walking
T2 - Journal of Experimental Biology
AU - Wu, Amy R.
AU - Kuo, Arthur D.
PY - 2016
DA - 2016/01/01
PB - The Company of Biologists
IS - Pt 19
VL - 219
PMID - 27473435
SN - 0022-0949
SN - 1477-9145
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2016_Wu,
author = {Amy R. Wu and Arthur D. Kuo},
title = {Determinants of preferred ground clearance during swing phase of human walking},
journal = {Journal of Experimental Biology},
year = {2016},
volume = {219},
publisher = {The Company of Biologists},
month = {jan},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.137356},
number = {Pt 19},
doi = {10.1242/jeb.137356}
}