British Journal of Radiology, volume 85, issue 1015, pages 897-904
Multidetector CT features of pulmonary focal ground-glass opacity: differences between benign and malignant
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2012-02-06
Journal:
British Journal of Radiology
Quartile SCImago
Q1
Quartile WOS
Q3
Impact factor: 1.8
ISSN: 00071285, 1748880X
General Medicine
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Abstract
To evaluate different features between benign and malignant pulmonary focal ground-glass opacity (fGGO) on multidetector CT (MDCT).82 pathologically or clinically confirmed fGGOs were retrospectively analysed with regard to demographic data, lesion size and location, attenuation value and MDCT features including shape, margin, interface, internal characteristics and adjacent structure. Differences between benign and malignant fGGOs were analysed using a χ(2) test, Fisher's exact test or Mann-Whitney U-test. Morphological characteristics were analysed by binary logistic regression analysis to estimate the likelihood of malignancy.There were 21 benign and 61 malignant lesions. No statistical differences were found between benign and malignant fGGOs in terms of demographic data, size, location and attenuation value. The frequency of lobulation (p=0.000), spiculation (p=0.008), spine-like process (p=0.004), well-defined but coarse interface (p=0.000), bronchus cut-off (p=0.003), other air-containing space (p=0.000), pleural indentation (p=0.000) and vascular convergence (p=0.006) was significantly higher in malignant fGGOs than that in benign fGGOs. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that lobulation, interface and pleural indentation were important indicators for malignant diagnosis of fGGO, with the corresponding odds ratios of 8.122, 3.139 and 9.076, respectively. In addition, a well-defined but coarse interface was the most important indicator of malignancy among all interface types. With all three important indicators considered, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 93.4%, 66.7% and 86.6%, respectively.An fGGO with lobulation, a well-defined but coarse interface and pleural indentation gives a greater than average likelihood of being malignant.
Top-30
Journals
1
2
3
4
|
|
Frontiers in Oncology
4 publications, 5.56%
|
|
Academic Radiology
4 publications, 5.56%
|
|
Journal of Inflammation Research
4 publications, 5.56%
|
|
Journal of Thoracic Disease
4 publications, 5.56%
|
|
European Radiology
3 publications, 4.17%
|
|
Insights into Imaging
2 publications, 2.78%
|
|
BMC Cancer
2 publications, 2.78%
|
|
Cancer Imaging
2 publications, 2.78%
|
|
European Journal of Radiology
2 publications, 2.78%
|
|
Thoracic Cancer
2 publications, 2.78%
|
|
Journal of Thoracic Imaging
2 publications, 2.78%
|
|
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
2 publications, 2.78%
|
|
British Journal of Radiology
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
Breathe
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
American Journal of Roentgenology
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
Oncotarget
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
Radiographics
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
Cancer Innovation
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
Cancers
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
BMC Medical Imaging
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
Scientific Reports
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
Tumor Biology
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
BioMedical Engineering Online
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
World Journal of Surgery
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
Radiologia Medica
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
JTCVS Open
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
1
2
3
4
|
Publishers
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
|
|
Springer Nature
17 publications, 23.61%
|
|
Elsevier
12 publications, 16.67%
|
|
7 publications, 9.72%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
6 publications, 8.33%
|
|
Wiley
5 publications, 6.94%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
5 publications, 6.94%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
3 publications, 4.17%
|
|
SAGE
2 publications, 2.78%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
2 publications, 2.78%
|
|
British Institute of Radiology
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
European Respiratory Society (ERS)
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
American Roentgen Ray Society
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
Impact Journals
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
MDPI
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
BMJ
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
1 publication, 1.39%
|
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Fan L. et al. Multidetector CT features of pulmonary focal ground-glass opacity: differences between benign and malignant // British Journal of Radiology. 2012. Vol. 85. No. 1015. pp. 897-904.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Fan L., Liu S. Y., Li Q., Yu H., Xiao X. Multidetector CT features of pulmonary focal ground-glass opacity: differences between benign and malignant // British Journal of Radiology. 2012. Vol. 85. No. 1015. pp. 897-904.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1259/bjr/33150223
UR - https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/33150223
TI - Multidetector CT features of pulmonary focal ground-glass opacity: differences between benign and malignant
T2 - British Journal of Radiology
AU - Fan, L.
AU - Liu, S. Y.
AU - Li, Q.
AU - Yu, H.
AU - Xiao, X-S
PY - 2012
DA - 2012/02/06
PB - British Institute of Radiology
SP - 897-904
IS - 1015
VL - 85
SN - 0007-1285
SN - 1748-880X
ER -
Cite this
BibTex
Copy
@article{2012_Fan,
author = {L. Fan and S. Y. Liu and Q. Li and H. Yu and X-S Xiao},
title = {Multidetector CT features of pulmonary focal ground-glass opacity: differences between benign and malignant},
journal = {British Journal of Radiology},
year = {2012},
volume = {85},
publisher = {British Institute of Radiology},
month = {feb},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/33150223},
number = {1015},
pages = {897--904},
doi = {10.1259/bjr/33150223}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Fan, L., et al. “Multidetector CT features of pulmonary focal ground-glass opacity: differences between benign and malignant.” British Journal of Radiology, vol. 85, no. 1015, Feb. 2012, pp. 897-904. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/33150223.
Profiles