Open Access
Open access
volume 15 issue 7 pages e1008304

Variation and selection on codon usage bias across an entire subphylum

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2019-07-31
scimago Q1
wos Q2
SJR1.945
CiteScore7.9
Impact factor3.7
ISSN15537390, 15537404
Cancer Research
Molecular Biology
Genetics
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Genetics (clinical)
Abstract
Variation in synonymous codon usage is abundant across multiple levels of organization: between codons of an amino acid, between genes in a genome, and between genomes of different species. It is now well understood that variation in synonymous codon usage is influenced by mutational bias coupled with both natural selection for translational efficiency and genetic drift, but how these processes shape patterns of codon usage bias across entire lineages remains unexplored. To address this question, we used a rich genomic data set of 327 species that covers nearly one third of the known biodiversity of the budding yeast subphylum Saccharomycotina. We found that, while genome-wide relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) for all codons was highly correlated with the GC content of the third codon position (GC3), the usage of codons for the amino acids proline, arginine, and glycine was inconsistent with the neutral expectation where mutational bias coupled with genetic drift drive codon usage. Examination between genes’ effective numbers of codons and their GC3 contents in individual genomes revealed that nearly a quarter of genes (381,174/1,683,203; 23%), as well as most genomes (308/327; 94%), significantly deviate from the neutral expectation. Finally, by evaluating the imprint of translational selection on codon usage, measured as the degree to which genes’ adaptiveness to the tRNA pool were correlated with selective pressure, we show that translational selection is widespread in budding yeast genomes (264/327; 81%). These results suggest that the contribution of translational selection and drift to patterns of synonymous codon usage across budding yeasts varies across codons, genes, and genomes; whereas drift is the primary driver of global codon usage across the subphylum, the codon bias of large numbers of genes in the majority of genomes is influenced by translational selection.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
BMC Plant Biology
6 publications, 6.9%
Frontiers in Microbiology
4 publications, 4.6%
Molecular Biology and Evolution
4 publications, 4.6%
PLoS ONE
3 publications, 3.45%
BMC Genomics
3 publications, 3.45%
Genetics
3 publications, 3.45%
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
3 publications, 3.45%
PLoS Genetics
2 publications, 2.3%
Gene
2 publications, 2.3%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
1 publication, 1.15%
Genes
1 publication, 1.15%
Pathogens
1 publication, 1.15%
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
1 publication, 1.15%
Frontiers in Genetics
1 publication, 1.15%
Frontiers in Neuroscience
1 publication, 1.15%
Journal of Fungi
1 publication, 1.15%
Molecular Genetics and Genomics
1 publication, 1.15%
Molecular Biotechnology
1 publication, 1.15%
Genetica
1 publication, 1.15%
Journal of Biosciences
1 publication, 1.15%
Cell Systems
1 publication, 1.15%
Nature Reviews Microbiology
1 publication, 1.15%
BMC Biology
1 publication, 1.15%
Nature Communications
1 publication, 1.15%
Virus Research
1 publication, 1.15%
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
1 publication, 1.15%
Mitochondrion
1 publication, 1.15%
Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment
1 publication, 1.15%
Genome Biology and Evolution
1 publication, 1.15%
1
2
3
4
5
6

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
Springer Nature
21 publications, 24.14%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
16 publications, 18.39%
Oxford University Press
12 publications, 13.79%
Frontiers Media S.A.
8 publications, 9.2%
Elsevier
7 publications, 8.05%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
5 publications, 5.75%
MDPI
4 publications, 4.6%
American Society for Microbiology
2 publications, 2.3%
Research Square Platform LLC
2 publications, 2.3%
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 1.15%
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
1 publication, 1.15%
Microbiology Society
1 publication, 1.15%
Wiley
1 publication, 1.15%
Pleiades Publishing
1 publication, 1.15%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
1 publication, 1.15%
Maximum Academic Press
1 publication, 1.15%
5
10
15
20
25
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
87
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Labella A. L. et al. Variation and selection on codon usage bias across an entire subphylum // PLoS Genetics. 2019. Vol. 15. No. 7. p. e1008304.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Labella A. L., Opulente D. A., Steenwyk J. L., Hittinger C. T., Rokas A. Variation and selection on codon usage bias across an entire subphylum // PLoS Genetics. 2019. Vol. 15. No. 7. p. e1008304.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008304
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008304
TI - Variation and selection on codon usage bias across an entire subphylum
T2 - PLoS Genetics
AU - Labella, Abigail L
AU - Opulente, Dana A
AU - Steenwyk, Jacob L.
AU - Hittinger, Chris T.
AU - Rokas, Antonis
PY - 2019
DA - 2019/07/31
PB - Public Library of Science (PLoS)
SP - e1008304
IS - 7
VL - 15
PMID - 31365533
SN - 1553-7390
SN - 1553-7404
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2019_Labella,
author = {Abigail L Labella and Dana A Opulente and Jacob L. Steenwyk and Chris T. Hittinger and Antonis Rokas},
title = {Variation and selection on codon usage bias across an entire subphylum},
journal = {PLoS Genetics},
year = {2019},
volume = {15},
publisher = {Public Library of Science (PLoS)},
month = {jul},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008304},
number = {7},
pages = {e1008304},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pgen.1008304}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Labella, Abigail L., et al. “Variation and selection on codon usage bias across an entire subphylum.” PLoS Genetics, vol. 15, no. 7, Jul. 2019, p. e1008304. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008304.