Open Access
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
11
SJR
4.061
CiteScore
19.7
Categories
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Genetics
Molecular Biology
Areas
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Years of issue
1983-2025
journal names
Molecular Biology and Evolution
MOL BIOL EVOL
Top-3 citing journals

Molecular Biology and Evolution
(24384 citations)

PLoS ONE
(22642 citations)

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
(18567 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Uppsala University
(168 publications)

Harvard University
(153 publications)

Pennsylvania State University
(149 publications)

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
(68 publications)

Uppsala University
(49 publications)

University of Cambridge
(43 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 941
Q2

Rhinitis in the Geriatric Population: Epidemiological and Cytological Aspects
Gelardi M., Giancaspro R., Boni E., Di Gioacchino M., Cintoli G., Cassano M., Ventura M.T.
Allergic rhinitis (AR), traditionally considered as a childhood condition, is increasingly recognized among older adults, driven by rising life expectancy and environmental factors. Although allergic sensitization declines with age, AR prevalence in the elderly is underestimated, with 3–12% of geriatric patients affected. Diagnosis is challenging due to nonspecific symptoms and overlapping conditions, leading to underdiagnosis and inadequate treatment. AR significantly impacts the quality of life (QoL), often exacerbating respiratory comorbidities like asthma and COPD. Presbynasalis, encompassing age-related sinonasal changes, includes reduced allergic responses, increased chronic rhinosinusitis, altered nasal structure, and impaired mucociliary clearance. Non-allergic rhinitis, atrophic rhinitis, and overlapping rhinitis further complicate AR diagnosis in the elderly. Effective management involves personalized pharmacotherapy, allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT), and addressing comorbidities and polypharmacy risks. Despite safety concerns, recent studies demonstrate AIT efficacy in elderly patients, reducing symptoms and medication use. Given AR’s impact on cognitive and respiratory health, accurate diagnosis and treatment can enhance QoL and mitigate health decline. Greater awareness and further research are essential to understand AR prevalence and improve outcomes for geriatric patients.
Q2

Evaluation of Convolutional Neural Network-Based Posture Identification Model of Older Adults: From Silhouette of Sagittal Photographs
Sugiyama N., Kai Y., Koda H., Morihara T., Kida N.
Background/Objectives: Posture is a significant indicator of health status in older adults. This study aimed to develop an automatic posture assessment tool based on sagittal photographs by validating recognition models using convolutional neural networks. Methods: A total of 9140 images were collected with data augmentation, and each image was labeled as either Ideal or Non-Ideal posture by physical therapists. The hidden and output layers of the models remained unchanged, while the loss function and optimizer were varied to construct four different model configurations: mean squared error and Adam (MSE & Adam), mean squared error and stochastic gradient descent (MSE & SGD), binary cross-entropy and Adam (BCE & Adam), and binary cross-entropy and stochastic gradient descent (BCE & SGD). Results: All four models demonstrated an improved accuracy in both the training and validation phases. However, the two BCE models exhibited divergence in validation loss, suggesting overfitting. Conversely, the two MSE models showed stability during learning. Therefore, we focused on the MSE models and evaluated their reliability using sensitivity, specificity, and Prevalence-Adjusted Bias-Adjusted Kappa (PABAK) based on the model’s output and correct label. Sensitivity and specificity were 85% and 84% for MSE & Adam and 67% and 77% for MSE & SGD, respectively. Moreover, PABAK values for agreement with the correct label were 0.69 and 0.43 for MSE & Adam and MSE & SGD, respectively. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the MSE & Adam model, in particular, can serve as a useful tool for screening inspections.
Q2

Comprehensive Geriatric Health Assessment Core Competencies and Skills for Primary Care Nurses: A Scoping Review
Dimitriadou I., Sini E., Šteinmiller J., Saridi M., Lundberg A., Häger M., Hjaltadottir I., Skuladottir S.S., Korsström N., Mört S., Tuori H., Fradelos E.C.
Objective: This scoping review aims to explore and synthesize the core competencies and skills required for primary care nurses conducting comprehensive geriatric assessments. Comprehensive geriatric assessments have become integral to providing holistic, patient-centered care for older adults with complex health needs, but the specific competencies required in primary care remain underresearched. Design: The review followed Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage scoping review framework, incorporating studies from PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. A comprehensive search was conducted from May 2014 to May 2024, and a population–concept–context (PCC) framework was used to identify relevant studies. Results: Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria, revealing six key competency domains for nurses involved in comprehensive geriatric assessments: Clinical Assessment and Diagnostic Competencies, Care Planning and Coordination, Professional and Interpersonal Competencies, Environmental and Systemic Competencies, Technical and Procedural Competencies, and Quality Improvement and Evidence-Based Practice. These competencies are essential for providing high-quality care to older adults and supporting integrated, multidisciplinary approaches to geriatric care. Conclusions: The identified competency domains provide a structured framework that can enhance primary care nurses’ ability to deliver more effective, individualized, and coordinated care to older adults. However, the standardization of these competencies remains crucial for ensuring consistency in practice.
Q2

Aging-Related Changes in Bimanual Coordination as a Screening Tool for Healthy Aging
Shizuka Y., Murata S., Goda A., Sawai S., Fujikawa S., Yamamoto R., Maru T., Nakagawa K., Nakano H.
Background/Objectives: The steady increase in the global older adult population highlights critical challenges, including the development of preventive strategies to extend healthy life expectancy and support independence in activities of daily living. Although there is an aging-related reduction in manual dexterity, the difference in bimanual coordination performance between young and older adults remains unclear. We aimed to elucidate the characteristics of bimanual coordination among young, young-old, and old-old adult participants. Methods: The participants performed in-phase (tapping the thumb and index finger together as fast as possible) and anti-phase (alternating movement between the left and right fingers) bimanual coordination tasks, and intergroup comparison of the task parameters was performed. The receiver operating characteristic curve was also conducted to calculate age cut-off points for bimanual coordination. Results: The number and frequency of taps significantly decreased sequentially in young, young-old, and old-old adults, whereas the average of tap interval significantly increased in this order (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the young-old and old-old groups in the average local maximum distance (p > 0.05). These findings indicate that bimanual coordination task performance varies depending on specific parameters. Furthermore, the age cut-off points for bimanual coordination were determined as 68.5 years for the right-hand number of taps (AUC = 0.73) in the anti-phase task, 73.5 years for the right-hand average of tapping interval (AUC = 0.72) in the anti-phase task, and 65.5 years for the left-hand frequency of taps (AUC = 0.72) of the anti-phase task. Conclusions: the number of taps, average of tapping interval, and frequency of taps are potential indicators of aging-related changes in bimanual coordination.
Q2

Establishment of a Mandarin Chinese Version of the Oral Frailty Index-8 and Exploration of the Association Between Oral Frailty and Sarcopenia
Yang C., Chen H., Iijima K., Tanaka T., Dai C., Yu S., Chuang H.
Objective: The aim of our study was to introduce a Mandarin Chinese version of the oral frailty assessment and explore the relationship between oral frailty and sarcopenia. A total of 409 elders (171 male, 238 female) participated in surveys using the Mandarin Chinese version of the Oral Frailty Index-8 (OFI-8) in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Method: The translation of the Mandarin Chinese version of OFI-8 adhered to the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) reporting guidelines. The eight-item questionnaire assessed tooth status, oral function, and other subjective measures. Additionally, sarcopenia was evaluated using the SARC-F questionnaire. Result: Among the participants, 195 participants were classified as non-oral frailty and 214 participants were oral frailty. Significant differences were observed in age, gender, body mass index (BMI), education level, and scores on the SARC-F questionnaire between the non-oral frailty and oral frailty populations. In logistic regression model, oral frailty showed a significant and positive association with the SARC-F score (adjusted odds ratio 2.130, 95% confidence interval 1.580–2.872, p-value < 0.001), even after adjusting for age, gender, BMI, and education level. Conclusion: This study has developed a valuable Mandarin Chinese version of the oral frailty screening questionnaire, the OFI-8. Oral frailty is significantly and positively associated with a higher risk of sarcopenia, particularly among the elderly, males, and those with lower education levels. This measure proves to be practical for assessing oral health status in the Chinese community, promoting oral frailty research within the Mandarin Chinese population, and addressing the challenges associated with defining oral frailty in future studies.
Q2

Prevalence of Poor Diet Quality and Associated Factors Among Older Adults from the Bagé Cohort Study of Ageing, Brazil (SIGa-Bagé)
Valério T.D., Neves R.G., Thumé E., Machado K.P., Tomasi E.
(1) Background: The accelerated aging of the population raises concerns about the diet of older adults due to its relationship with health and quality of life. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of poor diet quality and its association with sociodemographic factors and health status among older adults residing in the city of Bagé, located in southern Brazil; (2) Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using data from the 2016/2017 follow-up of the Bagé Aging Cohort Study (SIGa-Bagé). Diet quality was assessed using the Elderly Diet Quality Index. Descriptive analysis and Poisson regression with robust variance adjustment, based on hierarchical levels, were used to calculate crude and adjusted prevalence ratios with their respective 95% confidence intervals; (3) Results: The sample included 728 older adults (65.7% female; mean age: 77.2 years). Poor diet quality was observed in 41.5% of participants. After adjustment, male sex, black or brown skin color, absence of multimorbidity, and presence of depressive symptoms were significantly associated with poor diet quality; (4) Conclusions: The findings highlight the most vulnerable groups and the need for investments in strategies to promote mental health and healthy eating habits among the older adults, particularly among men and racial minority groups.
Q2

Impact of an Interprofessional Collaboration Between Physicians and Pharmacists on Fall-Risk-Increasing Drugs in Older Patients with Trauma in the Emergency Department
Hellinger B.J., Gries A., Bertsche T., Remane Y.
Background/Objectives: In older patients, falls constitute a significant public health concern and a major cause of hospital admission. Fall-risk-increasing drugs (FRIDs) represent a key risk factor for falls. Therefore, modifying these drugs represents an important strategy for preventing recurrent falls and further patient harm. The objective of this study was to evaluate a structured interprofessional collaboration between physicians and pharmacists on managing FRIDs in older patients who present to the emergency department (ED) after a fall. Methods: This study was performed in the ED of a tertiary care hospital. Patients who were >65 years old and presented to the ED after a fall were included. A routine care group was included between 1 March 2020 and 31 May 2020. A pharmaceutical care group was included between 1 September 2023 and 30 November 2023. In the pharmaceutical care group, a clinical pharmacist supported the physicians in identifying and managing FRIDs. Possible solutions for improving FRID prescription were discussed interprofessionally. The number of FRIDs at ED admission and discharge, as well as the number of FRID modifications, were evaluated. Results: A total of 107 patients were enrolled in each group. There were 85 patients in the routine care group and 89 patients in the pharmaceutical care group, with at least 1 FRID prescribed at ED admission (p = 0.483). At ED discharge, there were 85 patients in the routine care group and 68 patients in the pharmaceutical care group, with at least 1 FRID prescribed at (p = 0.010). There were seven FRID modifications in the routine care group compared to 125 FRID modifications in the pharmaceutical care group. Conclusions: In this study, the interprofessional collaboration between physicians and pharmacists led to a reduced number of FRIDs being prescribed and more FRID modifications in older patients at ED discharge. Further research is required to ascertain the feasibility of integrating this single intervention into a multifactorial fall prevention program.
Q2

Anemia in Elderly Patients: Contribution of Renal Aging and Chronic Kidney Disease
Santos S., Lousa I., Carvalho M., Sameiro-Faria M., Santos-Silva A., Belo L.
Renal aging is a physiological process characterized by structural and functional changes in the kidneys. The presence of disorders or pathologies can exacerbate these age-related changes, potentially leading to organ dysfunction. Chronic kidney disease (CKD), a significant global public health issue, is particularly prevalent in the elderly and is often associated with the age-related decline in kidney function. Anemia is one of the most frequent complications of CKD and is also highly prevalent in the elderly. Mild anemia, often multifactorial, is the most common presentation. Understanding the mechanisms driving anemia in this population is crucial to ensure appropriate treatment. The primary etiologies include nutritional deficiency, anemia of unknown cause, and anemia of chronic diseases, including CKD. This review provides an in-depth exploration of the complex pathophysiological mechanisms underlying anemia in elderly patients with CKD.
Q2

Case Report: Weakness and Recurrent Falls in an Older Patient
Galloway M., Hoffman N., Bray C.L., Ebrahim A., Puebla B., Ritchie D.
Background/Objectives: Lower-extremity weakness in older adults is often overlooked, yet it can have reversible or medical causes that contribute to increased falls. Common factors include vision disturbances, impaired balance due to otolith dysfunction, arthritis-related immobility, and lower-extremity neuropathy. This case presents a unique diagnostic challenge in evaluating bilateral lower-extremity weakness and recurrent falls in an older adult, highlighting the complexity of diagnosing conditions with overlapping symptoms. Case Presentation: The patient, a woman with a history of a neuroendocrine tumor, experienced progressive weakness in her lower extremities, along with oculomotor and facial muscle involvement, despite extensive testing. Key clinical findings included elevated protein levels in cerebrospinal fluid, suggesting the possibility of an infectious or autoimmune process. A thorough investigation was conducted, including testing for both common and rare conditions such as Guillain–Barré syndrome, Lyme disease, and tuberculosis. Results: Despite comprehensive diagnostic efforts, no clear etiology was identified. The patient’s condition was eventually considered to be related to carcinomatosis meningoencephalitis, a rare complication from a previous cancer diagnosis. Given the progressive nature of her symptoms and lack of treatment options, she was transitioned to palliative care. Conclusions: This case highlights the importance of a comprehensive differential diagnosis in older patients with unexplained weakness and falls. Rare neurological conditions should not be overlooked, even when more common causes are suspected. Clinicians should remain aware that falls and weakness in older adults may stem from various pathologies, some of which are reversible if identified early, and rare causes must always be considered when standard treatments fail.
Q2

Cognitive Performance Among Older Adults with Subjective Cognitive Decline
López-Higes R., Rubio-Valdehita S., López-Sanz D., Fernandes S.M., Rodrigues P.F., Delgado-Losada M.L.
Objectives: The main objective of this cross-sectional study was to investigate if there are significant differences in cognition between a group of older adults with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and cognitively intact controls. Methods: An initial sample of 132 older people underwent an extensive neuropsychological evaluation (memory, executive functions, and language) and were classified according to diagnostic criteria. Two groups of 33 subjects each, controls and SCD, were formed using an a priori case-matching procedures in different variables: age, biological sex, years of education, cognitive reserve, and Mini-Mental State Exam. Results: The mean age and standard deviation in the control group were equal to 70.39 ± 4.31 years, while in the SCD group, they were 70.30 ± 4.33 years. The number of males (n = 9) and females (n = 24) was equal in both groups; the means of years of education were also quite similar. SCD participants have a significantly lower mood than the controls. Significant differences between groups were obtained in delayed recall, inhibitory control, and comprehension of sentences not fitted to canonical word order in Spanish. A logistic regression revealed that a lower score on the Stroop’s interference condition is associated with a higher likelihood of having SCD. Finally, ROC analysis provided a model that performs better than random chance, and a cut-off score in Stroop’s interference condition equal to 49 was suggested for clinically differentiating the two groups. Conclusions: This study highlights that, compared to a matched control group, participants with SCD showed subtle but significant neuropsychological differences.
Q2

Effect of Protein Supplementation on Orthostatic Hypotension in Older Adult Patients with Heart Failure
Azhar G., Pangle A.K., Coker K., Sharma S., Wei J.Y.
Purpose: Heart failure (HF) impairs physical performance and increases the incidence of orthostatic hypotension (OH). Individuals with OH have a higher risk of falls, which are a major source of morbidity and mortality in older adults. Dietary protein supplementation can improve physical performance in healthy older adult individuals; however, its effect on OH in older adult patients with HF is unknown. Methods: Twenty-one older adult patients with mild-to-moderate HF were randomized to placebo or protein supplementation. Dietary protein was supplemented with whey protein so the total protein intake for each participant was 1.2 g/kg bodyweight/day, plus 1 g/day of the amino acid l-carnitine for 16 weeks. Susceptibility to OH was assessed using a head-up tilt test, blood markers, and a functional test (6 min walk) at baseline and 16 weeks. Results: There were no differences in tilt test responses or 6 min walk test (6MWT) distances. The protein-supplement group had a significant increase in 6MWT pulse pressures post-walk after 16 weeks of treatment as compared to placebo. However, the tachycardia observed at baseline after 6MWT in the protein group was not seen at the end of the study. There was also a trend towards lower levels of brain naturetic peptide (proBNP) in the protein group vs. placebo at 16 weeks. Conclusions: The improved pulse-pressure response to exertion and positive trends in proBNP in this pilot study suggest that dietary supplementation may improve cardiovascular function and general health in individuals with HF and that larger future studies are justifiable.
Q2

Assessing Frailty in the Older: The Role of Bite Force as an Independent Indicator
Ferreira L.M., Brito J., da Silva J.R., da Silva M.L., Fischel e Andrade M.E., Júdice A., Mendes J.J., Machado V., Botelho J.T., Regalo S.C.
Background: This study investigates the relationship between bite force and grip strength as indicators of frailty in older adults. Frailty syndrome, characterized by increased vulnerability to adverse health outcomes, poses significant challenges in geriatric care. Objectives: This research builds on previous findings linking oral health to frailty risk, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions. Methods: A total of 59 older participants, aged 60 years and older, were enrolled in this cross-sectional study conducted at the Egas Moniz School of Health and Science. The participants underwent assessments of bite force using an electric dynamometer and grip strength using a specialized device. Body composition was also measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Results: Statistical analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between bite force and grip strength, even after adjusting for age and body mass index (BMI). Age was significantly correlated with bite and grip force (p < 0.05), while BMI was correlated only with handgrip force but not with bite force (coefficient = −0.047, p = 0.737). Notably, bite force was found to be independent of BMI, unlike grip strength, which is generally influenced by body composition. This independence highlights the potential of bite force as a reliable and distinct marker for frailty that is not confounded by BMI-related factors. This study highlights the importance of oral health in maintaining overall well-being in older adults. Reduced bite force may indicate an increased risk of frailty, which can lead to malnutrition and decreased quality of life. These findings suggest that integrating bite force measurements into clinical assessments may improve the assessment of frailty and inform interventions aimed at improving health outcomes in the older population. Conclusions: This research provides new insights into the association between bite force and grip strength, emphasizing the unique value of bite force as an independent marker of frailty. It advocates for further studies to explore its role in geriatric care strategies.
Q2

Validation of the Italian Version of the Rapid Geriatric Assessment in Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Tacchino C., Carmisciano L., Page E., Ottaviani S., Tagliafico L., Boccini A., Signori A., Giannotti C., Nencioni A., Monacelli F.
Background/Objectives: The Rapid Geriatric Assessment (RGA) is a tool designed to screen for frailty, sarcopenia, anorexia related to aging, and cognitive impairment. This study aimed to translate and validate the RGA for use among Italian community-dwelling older adults. Methods: This cross-cultural study involved 100 community-dwelling older adults randomly recruited through convenience sampling from general practitioner offices in Genoa (Italy), between January and June 2019. The RGA includes the Simple FRAIL Questionnaire Screening Tool, SARC-F Screening for Sarcopenia, Simplified Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ), and Rapid Cognitive Screening (RCS). These were validated against gold-standard tools: the Abbreviated Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (aCGA) and Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI). Additional assessments included the Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Handgrip test. The validation process included forward–backward translation, synthesis, and consensus by independent reviewers. Psychometric properties, internal consistency (Cronbach alpha), and validity correlations were analyzed. Results: The RGA demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties, with internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.59) and significant validity correlations (RGA and aCGA, rho = 0.34, p = 0.001; RGA and MPI, rho = 0.49, p < 0.001). Discriminant validity was confirmed by significant correlations between specific subitems and reference measures: FRAIL with TUG (p < 0.05), SARC-F with Handgrip strength (p = 0.013), SNAQ with BMI, and RCS with MMSE (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The Italian version of the RGA is a reliable screening tool for geriatric syndromes in community-dwelling older adults. While it does not replace a CGA, the RGA may identify individuals who may benefit from further evaluation using a complete CGA.
Q2

Aging Gut-Brain Interactions: Pro-Inflammatory Gut Bacteria Are Elevated in Fecal Samples from Individuals Living with Alzheimer’s Dementia
Donaldson A.I., Fyfe C.L., Martin J.C., Smith E.E., Horgan G.W., Myint P.K., Johnstone A.M., Scott K.P.
Background/Objectives: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, characterized by an irreversible decline in cognitive function. The pathogenesis of several neurodegenerative disorders has been linked to changes in the gut microbiota, transmitted through the gut-brain axis. Methods: We set out to establish by case-control study methodology whether there were any differences in the composition and/or function of the gut microbiota between older resident adults in care homes with or without an AD diagnosis via analysis of the microbial composition from fecal samples. Results: The microbial composition, determined by 16S rRNA gene profiling, indicated that AD sufferers had significantly increased proportions of Escherichia/Shigella and Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1, and significantly decreased proportions of Bacteroides, Faecalibacterium, Blautia, and Roseburia species. The increase in potentially pro-inflammatory bacteria was consistent with slightly higher concentrations of calprotectin, a biomarker of gut inflammation. Fecal concentrations of most microbial metabolites measured were similar across groups, although participants with AD had significantly increased proportions of the branched-chain fatty acid, iso-butyrate, and lower overall concentrations of total short chain fatty acids. Conclusions: Participants with Alzheimer’s disease have several key differences within their gut microbiota profile, in contrast to care home residents without Alzheimer’s disease. The altered microbiome included both compositional and functional changes linked to poorer health and gut inflammation.
Q2

Health Professional Support for Friends and Family Members of Older People Discharged from Hospital After a Fracture: A Survey Study
Smith T.O., Arnold S., Baxter M.
Background/Objectives: Friends and family members of people who are discharged from hospital after a fracture often take on caring roles, since these patients have reduced independence during recovery. Previous literature suggests that these individuals are rarely supported in their adoption of these roles. No studies have previously explored the use of carer training interventions to support friends/family members by health professionals in this setting. This survey study aimed to address this. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among health professionals who treat people in hospital following fractures. Respondents were asked about the use of care training for friends/family members of people discharged from hospital after fracture, and whether a clinical trial would be useful to test such carer training interventions. Results: A total of 114 health professionals accessed the survey. Fifty respondents (44%) reported that carer training was not offered in their practice. When it was offered, respondents reported this was not consistently provided. Less than 12% of respondents reported offering carer training to most of their patients following a fracture. What was offered in these instances was largely based on education provision (69%), practical skills in exercise prescription (55%) and manual handling (51%). Ninety-eight percent of respondents reported that a clinical trial would be, or would potentially be, valuable to aid a change in practice to include carer training in routine clinical care. Conclusions: Carer training programmes are not routinely provided in clinical practice for people following a fracture. The results indicate that health professionals see a potential value in these programmes, but further research is recommended to provide an evidence base for these interventions.
Top-100
Citing journals
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
|
|
Molecular Biology and Evolution
24384 citations, 2.96%
|
|
PLoS ONE
22642 citations, 2.75%
|
|
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
18567 citations, 2.25%
|
|
Scientific Reports
14164 citations, 1.72%
|
|
Molecular Ecology
11898 citations, 1.44%
|
|
Genome Biology and Evolution
10953 citations, 1.33%
|
|
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
10435 citations, 1.27%
|
|
BMC Genomics
8948 citations, 1.09%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
7384 citations, 0.9%
|
|
BMC Evolutionary Biology
7300 citations, 0.89%
|
|
Frontiers in Microbiology
7300 citations, 0.89%
|
|
Mitochondrial DNA Part B: Resources
6645 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Frontiers in Plant Science
6526 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Genetics
5927 citations, 0.72%
|
|
Systematic Biology
5746 citations, 0.7%
|
|
Gene
5584 citations, 0.68%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
5532 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Nature Communications
5183 citations, 0.63%
|
|
PeerJ
4501 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Evolution
4414 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Genes
4352 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Evolution; international journal of organic evolution
4207 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Ecology and Evolution
4083 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Viruses
4005 citations, 0.49%
|
|
PLoS Genetics
3379 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
3371 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Zootaxa
3354 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
2834 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Frontiers in Genetics
2487 citations, 0.3%
|
|
ZooKeys
2431 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Genome Research
2358 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Microorganisms
2311 citations, 0.28%
|
|
BMC Plant Biology
2244 citations, 0.27%
|
|
eLife
2236 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Archives of Virology
2079 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Current Biology
2053 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Heredity
2034 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
2018 citations, 0.25%
|
|
New Phytologist
2001 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
1995 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Nucleic Acids Research
1939 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Biogeography
1892 citations, 0.23%
|
|
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
1867 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
1859 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
1799 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Virology
1720 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Plants
1633 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
1585 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Molecular Ecology Resources
1559 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Phytotaxa
1493 citations, 0.18%
|
|
American Journal of Botany
1487 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Methods in Molecular Biology
1435 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Systematic Entomology
1411 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Zoologica Scripta
1394 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
1346 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Diversity
1319 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Parasitology Research
1277 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Bioinformatics
1276 citations, 0.15%
|
|
PLoS Computational Biology
1269 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Nature Reviews Genetics
1267 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Plant Journal
1262 citations, 0.15%
|
|
BMC Biology
1242 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
1237 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Parasites and Vectors
1186 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Nature
1162 citations, 0.14%
|
|
BMC Bioinformatics
1157 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Wellcome Open Research
1109 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Archives of Microbiology
1085 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Biological Chemistry
1082 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Science
1066 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Animals
1022 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Insects
997 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Trends in Genetics
993 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Plant Disease
980 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Virus Evolution
968 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Conservation Genetics
965 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Fungi
919 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Heredity
898 citations, 0.11%
|
|
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
882 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Fish and Shellfish Immunology
880 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Nature Ecology and Evolution
874 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Genomics
865 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Microbiology spectrum
855 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Mitochondrial DNA Part A: DNA Mapping, Sequencing, and Analysis
848 citations, 0.1%
|
|
PLoS Biology
825 citations, 0.1%
|
|
PLoS Pathogens
821 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of General Virology
820 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Cladistics
795 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Evolutionary Applications
781 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Environmental Microbiology
780 citations, 0.09%
|
|
BioEssays
780 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Genetica
772 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
752 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Current Opinion in Genetics and Development
745 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Genome
741 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Journal of Human Genetics
733 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Taxon
728 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Current Microbiology
723 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
721 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology
714 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
|
Citing publishers
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
|
|
Springer Nature
156443 citations, 19%
|
|
Elsevier
123794 citations, 15.03%
|
|
Wiley
94811 citations, 11.51%
|
|
Oxford University Press
82242 citations, 9.99%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
56111 citations, 6.81%
|
|
MDPI
41770 citations, 5.07%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
33570 citations, 4.08%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
26889 citations, 3.27%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
23849 citations, 2.9%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
14740 citations, 1.79%
|
|
Microbiology Society
14096 citations, 1.71%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
8587 citations, 1.04%
|
|
The Royal Society
7668 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
6098 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Magnolia Press
5766 citations, 0.7%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
5430 citations, 0.66%
|
|
PeerJ
4973 citations, 0.6%
|
|
3675 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
3596 citations, 0.44%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
3544 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Annual Reviews
3428 citations, 0.42%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
3111 citations, 0.38%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
2947 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Scientific Societies
2887 citations, 0.35%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
2096 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
2054 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
1955 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
1873 citations, 0.23%
|
|
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
1655 citations, 0.2%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
1647 citations, 0.2%
|
|
SAGE
1483 citations, 0.18%
|
|
F1000 Research
1471 citations, 0.18%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
1379 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
1189 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Association for Plant Taxonomy
951 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Brill
898 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
865 citations, 0.11%
|
|
S. Karger AG
688 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
652 citations, 0.08%
|
|
SciELO
617 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Portland Press
616 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
613 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Inter-Research Science Center
609 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Zoological Society of Japan
600 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
586 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Genetica
547 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Physiological Society
531 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
521 citations, 0.06%
|
|
480 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Han-Gug Misaengmul Hag-hoe/The Microbiological Society of Korea
333 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Korean Society of Genetics
328 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IOP Publishing
310 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Genetics Society of Japan
295 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Mycological Society of Japan
279 citations, 0.03%
|
|
European Molecular Biology Organization
250 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Crop Science Society of America
232 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Rockefeller University Press
231 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Entomological Society of America
231 citations, 0.03%
|
|
210 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Ornithologists' Union
195 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
192 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The American Association of Immunologists
189 citations, 0.02%
|
|
International Mycological Association
186 citations, 0.02%
|
|
World Scientific
185 citations, 0.02%
|
|
EDP Sciences
181 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
176 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IntechOpen
159 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Endocrine Society
153 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Museum of Zoology Dresden
142 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB)
141 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institute of Mathematical Statistics
135 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Science Alert
130 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Impact Journals
126 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz
124 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
124 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
124 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
122 citations, 0.01%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
120 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Society of Parasitologists
120 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Society of Nematologists
118 citations, 0.01%
|
|
King Saud University
116 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute
116 citations, 0.01%
|
|
110 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB)
110 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Korean Society of Mycology
110 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Wayne State University Press
108 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Museum of Natural History (BioOne sponsored)
108 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
107 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Biology Centre, AS CR
107 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Bioscientifica
100 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Society for the Study of Reproduction
99 citations, 0.01%
|
|
China Science Publishing & Media
98 citations, 0.01%
|
|
National Research Council Canada
97 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Peer Community In
97 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
95 citations, 0.01%
|
|
AIP Publishing
94 citations, 0.01%
|
|
93 citations, 0.01%
|
|
BMJ
92 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Museum and Institute of Zoology at the Polish Academy of Sciences
92 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
91 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
|
Publishing organizations
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
|
|
Uppsala University
168 publications, 1.87%
|
|
Harvard University
153 publications, 1.7%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
149 publications, 1.66%
|
|
University of Cambridge
147 publications, 1.63%
|
|
University of Oxford
145 publications, 1.61%
|
|
University of Chicago
145 publications, 1.61%
|
|
University of Michigan
130 publications, 1.44%
|
|
Cornell University
122 publications, 1.36%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
120 publications, 1.33%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
111 publications, 1.23%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
106 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University College London
99 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Sorbonne University
97 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Arizona
97 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Stanford University
91 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
90 publications, 1%
|
|
University of Tokyo
89 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Pompeu Fabra University
87 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Arizona State University
85 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Washington
85 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
83 publications, 0.92%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
81 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Dalhousie University
81 publications, 0.9%
|
|
University of California, Davis
81 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
76 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Temple University
76 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
74 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
74 publications, 0.82%
|
|
University of Toronto
72 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
72 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
69 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
69 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Institut Pasteur
68 publications, 0.76%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
67 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of Barcelona
67 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
66 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Yale University
65 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of British Columbia
65 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Florida
62 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Australian National University
61 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
61 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Queensland
60 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
60 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
59 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Lausanne
57 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Imperial College London
57 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Sydney
57 publications, 0.63%
|
|
ETH Zurich
56 publications, 0.62%
|
|
North Carolina State University
56 publications, 0.62%
|
|
National Institute of Genetics
53 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Melbourne
51 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
50 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
50 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
49 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Massey University
49 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Wellcome Sanger Institute
48 publications, 0.53%
|
|
University of Zurich
47 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Duke University
47 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Kyoto University
47 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Iowa State University
45 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Vienna
45 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Lund University
44 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Helsinki
44 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Porto
43 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Bath
43 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
42 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
42 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Fudan University
40 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Charles University
40 publications, 0.44%
|
|
The Graduate University for Advanced Studies
40 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Bern
39 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
39 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
39 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Basel
38 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Paris Cité University
38 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
38 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Medical University of Vienna
37 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Auckland
37 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Trinity College Dublin
37 publications, 0.41%
|
|
McMaster University
37 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
37 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
37 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
37 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Michigan State University
36 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
36 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Rochester
36 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology
35 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
34 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Yunnan University
34 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Bristol
34 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Minnesota
34 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Texas A&M University
34 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of California, Santa Cruz
33 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Valencia
33 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies
33 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Utah
33 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Peking University
32 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Stockholm University
32 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Aarhus University
32 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Münster
32 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
68 publications, 4.32%
|
|
Uppsala University
49 publications, 3.11%
|
|
University of Cambridge
43 publications, 2.73%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
42 publications, 2.67%
|
|
University of Oxford
39 publications, 2.48%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
34 publications, 2.16%
|
|
Harvard University
34 publications, 2.16%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
33 publications, 2.1%
|
|
Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
31 publications, 1.97%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
31 publications, 1.97%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
31 publications, 1.97%
|
|
Temple University
30 publications, 1.9%
|
|
Cornell University
29 publications, 1.84%
|
|
Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
29 publications, 1.84%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
29 publications, 1.84%
|
|
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
26 publications, 1.65%
|
|
University of Toronto
26 publications, 1.65%
|
|
Sorbonne University
25 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Stanford University
25 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Arizona State University
25 publications, 1.59%
|
|
University of Michigan
25 publications, 1.59%
|
|
University College London
24 publications, 1.52%
|
|
Pompeu Fabra University
24 publications, 1.52%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
22 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
21 publications, 1.33%
|
|
University of Zurich
21 publications, 1.33%
|
|
University of Washington
20 publications, 1.27%
|
|
University of California, Davis
20 publications, 1.27%
|
|
Charles University
19 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Fudan University
18 publications, 1.14%
|
|
University of Melbourne
18 publications, 1.14%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
18 publications, 1.14%
|
|
University of Tokyo
18 publications, 1.14%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
17 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Helsinki
17 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Lausanne
17 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Basel
17 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Northwest University
17 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
17 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
17 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Institut Pasteur
17 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
17 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
17 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Stockholm University
16 publications, 1.02%
|
|
ETH Zurich
16 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Yale University
16 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Texas A&M University
16 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Iowa State University
15 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Queensland
15 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Arizona
15 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
15 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Chicago
15 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Vienna
15 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Wellcome Sanger Institute
15 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of East Anglia
15 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Florida
15 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Zhejiang University
14 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Peking University
14 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Australian National University
14 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Michigan State University
14 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Kyoto University
14 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
14 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University of British Columbia
14 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Lund University
13 publications, 0.83%
|
|
China Agricultural University
13 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
13 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Aarhus University
13 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Nottingham
13 publications, 0.83%
|
|
North Carolina State University
13 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of California, Santa Cruz
13 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology
13 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
13 publications, 0.83%
|
|
King Abdulaziz University
12 publications, 0.76%
|
|
University of Bern
12 publications, 0.76%
|
|
Imperial College London
12 publications, 0.76%
|
|
National University of Singapore
12 publications, 0.76%
|
|
Northwest A&F University
12 publications, 0.76%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
12 publications, 0.76%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
12 publications, 0.76%
|
|
Huazhong Agricultural University
11 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
11 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
11 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Yunnan University
11 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen
11 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Minnesota
11 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Cardiff University
11 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University
11 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
11 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Exeter
11 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
10 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
10 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Nanjing Normal University
10 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
10 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
10 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
10 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of St Andrews
10 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology
10 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Porto
10 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Barcelona
10 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Paris Sciences et Lettres
10 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
Publishing countries
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
|
|
USA
|
USA, 3093, 34.37%
USA
3093 publications, 34.37%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 971, 10.79%
United Kingdom
971 publications, 10.79%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 706, 7.84%
Germany
706 publications, 7.84%
|
France
|
France, 671, 7.46%
France
671 publications, 7.46%
|
China
|
China, 671, 7.46%
China
671 publications, 7.46%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 500, 5.56%
Canada
500 publications, 5.56%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 436, 4.84%
Japan
436 publications, 4.84%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 353, 3.92%
Spain
353 publications, 3.92%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 349, 3.88%
Australia
349 publications, 3.88%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 304, 3.38%
Sweden
304 publications, 3.38%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 271, 3.01%
Switzerland
271 publications, 3.01%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 166, 1.84%
Italy
166 publications, 1.84%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 139, 1.54%
Denmark
139 publications, 1.54%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 137, 1.52%
Netherlands
137 publications, 1.52%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 134, 1.49%
Austria
134 publications, 1.49%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 116, 1.29%
New Zealand
116 publications, 1.29%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 112, 1.24%
Israel
112 publications, 1.24%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 110, 1.22%
Belgium
110 publications, 1.22%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 101, 1.12%
Russia
101 publications, 1.12%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 88, 0.98%
Czech Republic
88 publications, 0.98%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 85, 0.94%
Portugal
85 publications, 0.94%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 83, 0.92%
Brazil
83 publications, 0.92%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 79, 0.88%
Ireland
79 publications, 0.88%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 74, 0.82%
Finland
74 publications, 0.82%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 66, 0.73%
Norway
66 publications, 0.73%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 65, 0.72%
South Africa
65 publications, 0.72%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 58, 0.64%
Republic of Korea
58 publications, 0.64%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 56, 0.62%
Mexico
56 publications, 0.62%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 45, 0.5%
Singapore
45 publications, 0.5%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 43, 0.48%
Poland
43 publications, 0.48%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 42, 0.47%
Argentina
42 publications, 0.47%
|
India
|
India, 41, 0.46%
India
41 publications, 0.46%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 40, 0.44%
Saudi Arabia
40 publications, 0.44%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 33, 0.37%
Hungary
33 publications, 0.37%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 29, 0.32%
Greece
29 publications, 0.32%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 26, 0.29%
Kenya
26 publications, 0.29%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 25, 0.28%
Chile
25 publications, 0.28%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 21, 0.23%
Thailand
21 publications, 0.23%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 20, 0.22%
Estonia
20 publications, 0.22%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 17, 0.19%
Indonesia
17 publications, 0.19%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 17, 0.19%
Turkey
17 publications, 0.19%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 17, 0.19%
Croatia
17 publications, 0.19%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 16, 0.18%
Colombia
16 publications, 0.18%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 15, 0.17%
Malaysia
15 publications, 0.17%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 15, 0.17%
Panama
15 publications, 0.17%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 14, 0.16%
Peru
14 publications, 0.16%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 13, 0.14%
Vietnam
13 publications, 0.14%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 13, 0.14%
UAE
13 publications, 0.14%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 12, 0.13%
Georgia
12 publications, 0.13%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 11, 0.12%
Tanzania
11 publications, 0.12%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 10, 0.11%
Slovenia
10 publications, 0.11%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 9, 0.1%
Iran
9 publications, 0.1%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 8, 0.09%
Nigeria
8 publications, 0.09%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 8, 0.09%
Pakistan
8 publications, 0.09%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 7, 0.08%
Cameroon
7 publications, 0.08%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 7, 0.08%
Ethiopia
7 publications, 0.08%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 6, 0.07%
Iceland
6 publications, 0.07%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 6, 0.07%
Uganda
6 publications, 0.07%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 6, 0.07%
Ecuador
6 publications, 0.07%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 5, 0.06%
Egypt
5 publications, 0.06%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 5, 0.06%
Iraq
5 publications, 0.06%
|
Cambodia
|
Cambodia, 5, 0.06%
Cambodia
5 publications, 0.06%
|
Papua New Guinea
|
Papua New Guinea, 5, 0.06%
Papua New Guinea
5 publications, 0.06%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 5, 0.06%
Uruguay
5 publications, 0.06%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 4, 0.04%
Ukraine
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 4, 0.04%
Armenia
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 4, 0.04%
Venezuela
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 4, 0.04%
Ghana
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 4, 0.04%
Cyprus
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo, 4, 0.04%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 4, 0.04%
Costa Rica
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 4, 0.04%
Lebanon
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 4, 0.04%
Lithuania
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Madagascar
|
Madagascar, 4, 0.04%
Madagascar
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 4, 0.04%
Romania
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 4, 0.04%
Slovakia
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 4, 0.04%
Philippines
4 publications, 0.04%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 3, 0.03%
Bangladesh
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Gabon
|
Gabon, 3, 0.03%
Gabon
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Gambia
|
Gambia, 3, 0.03%
Gambia
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 3, 0.03%
Jordan
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Laos
|
Laos, 3, 0.03%
Laos
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 3, 0.03%
Morocco
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Monaco
|
Monaco, 3, 0.03%
Monaco
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Seychelles
|
Seychelles, 3, 0.03%
Seychelles
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Senegal
|
Senegal, 3, 0.03%
Senegal
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 3, 0.03%
Serbia
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 3, 0.03%
Tunisia
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Uzbekistan
|
Uzbekistan, 3, 0.03%
Uzbekistan
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 2, 0.02%
Belarus
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 2, 0.02%
Algeria
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Benin
|
Benin, 2, 0.02%
Benin
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 2, 0.02%
Bulgaria
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Burkina Faso
|
Burkina Faso, 2, 0.02%
Burkina Faso
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 2, 0.02%
Zambia
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Kyrgyzstan
|
Kyrgyzstan, 2, 0.02%
Kyrgyzstan
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Congo-Brazzaville
|
Congo-Brazzaville, 2, 0.02%
Congo-Brazzaville
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
Côte d'Ivoire, 2, 0.02%
Côte d'Ivoire
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 2, 0.02%
Cuba
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 2, 0.02%
Latvia
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
|
USA
|
USA, 667, 42.35%
USA
667 publications, 42.35%
|
China
|
China, 299, 18.98%
China
299 publications, 18.98%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 268, 17.02%
United Kingdom
268 publications, 17.02%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 194, 12.32%
Germany
194 publications, 12.32%
|
France
|
France, 155, 9.84%
France
155 publications, 9.84%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 97, 6.16%
Canada
97 publications, 6.16%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 92, 5.84%
Sweden
92 publications, 5.84%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 91, 5.78%
Switzerland
91 publications, 5.78%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 81, 5.14%
Japan
81 publications, 5.14%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 78, 4.95%
Spain
78 publications, 4.95%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 77, 4.89%
Australia
77 publications, 4.89%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 51, 3.24%
Denmark
51 publications, 3.24%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 50, 3.17%
Netherlands
50 publications, 3.17%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 46, 2.92%
Czech Republic
46 publications, 2.92%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 42, 2.67%
Italy
42 publications, 2.67%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 41, 2.6%
Austria
41 publications, 2.6%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 38, 2.41%
Belgium
38 publications, 2.41%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 38, 2.41%
Brazil
38 publications, 2.41%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 38, 2.41%
Israel
38 publications, 2.41%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 26, 1.65%
Russia
26 publications, 1.65%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 24, 1.52%
Norway
24 publications, 1.52%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 23, 1.46%
Finland
23 publications, 1.46%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 21, 1.33%
Portugal
21 publications, 1.33%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 21, 1.33%
South Africa
21 publications, 1.33%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 16, 1.02%
Saudi Arabia
16 publications, 1.02%
|
India
|
India, 15, 0.95%
India
15 publications, 0.95%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 15, 0.95%
Mexico
15 publications, 0.95%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 15, 0.95%
Singapore
15 publications, 0.95%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 13, 0.83%
Argentina
13 publications, 0.83%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 13, 0.83%
New Zealand
13 publications, 0.83%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 13, 0.83%
Republic of Korea
13 publications, 0.83%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 12, 0.76%
Chile
12 publications, 0.76%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 11, 0.7%
Hungary
11 publications, 0.7%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 11, 0.7%
Greece
11 publications, 0.7%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 11, 0.7%
Ireland
11 publications, 0.7%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 11, 0.7%
Kenya
11 publications, 0.7%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 11, 0.7%
Poland
11 publications, 0.7%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 10, 0.63%
Colombia
10 publications, 0.63%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 8, 0.51%
Turkey
8 publications, 0.51%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 7, 0.44%
Thailand
7 publications, 0.44%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 6, 0.38%
Estonia
6 publications, 0.38%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 6, 0.38%
Peru
6 publications, 0.38%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 6, 0.38%
Croatia
6 publications, 0.38%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 5, 0.32%
Indonesia
5 publications, 0.32%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 5, 0.32%
Malaysia
5 publications, 0.32%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 5, 0.32%
Nigeria
5 publications, 0.32%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 5, 0.32%
UAE
5 publications, 0.32%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 5, 0.32%
Tanzania
5 publications, 0.32%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 5, 0.32%
Ethiopia
5 publications, 0.32%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 4, 0.25%
Vietnam
4 publications, 0.25%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 4, 0.25%
Iran
4 publications, 0.25%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 4, 0.25%
Uganda
4 publications, 0.25%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 4, 0.25%
Ecuador
4 publications, 0.25%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 3, 0.19%
Ukraine
3 publications, 0.19%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 3, 0.19%
Iceland
3 publications, 0.19%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 3, 0.19%
Costa Rica
3 publications, 0.19%
|
Madagascar
|
Madagascar, 3, 0.19%
Madagascar
3 publications, 0.19%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 3, 0.19%
Pakistan
3 publications, 0.19%
|
Papua New Guinea
|
Papua New Guinea, 3, 0.19%
Papua New Guinea
3 publications, 0.19%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 2, 0.13%
Bangladesh
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 2, 0.13%
Ghana
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 2, 0.13%
Egypt
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Cambodia
|
Cambodia, 2, 0.13%
Cambodia
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 2, 0.13%
Cyprus
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Kyrgyzstan
|
Kyrgyzstan, 2, 0.13%
Kyrgyzstan
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 2, 0.13%
Cuba
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Laos
|
Laos, 2, 0.13%
Laos
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Monaco
|
Monaco, 2, 0.13%
Monaco
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 2, 0.13%
Panama
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 0.13%
Romania
2 publications, 0.13%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 2, 0.13%
North Macedonia
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Seychelles
|
Seychelles, 2, 0.13%
Seychelles
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 2, 0.13%
Serbia
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 2, 0.13%
Slovenia
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Tajikistan
|
Tajikistan, 2, 0.13%
Tajikistan
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Uzbekistan
|
Uzbekistan, 2, 0.13%
Uzbekistan
2 publications, 0.13%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 1, 0.06%
Algeria
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Afghanistan
|
Afghanistan, 1, 0.06%
Afghanistan
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Benin
|
Benin, 1, 0.06%
Benin
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 1, 0.06%
Venezuela
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Gabon
|
Gabon, 1, 0.06%
Gabon
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 1, 0.06%
Georgia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Dominican Republic
|
Dominican Republic, 1, 0.06%
Dominican Republic
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 1, 0.06%
Zambia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.06%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 1, 0.06%
Cameroon
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
Côte d'Ivoire, 1, 0.06%
Côte d'Ivoire
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.06%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 1, 0.06%
Latvia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.06%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.06%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 1, 0.06%
Malawi
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 1, 0.06%
Mongolia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 1, 0.06%
Nepal
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Paraguay
|
Paraguay, 1, 0.06%
Paraguay
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Rwanda
|
Rwanda, 1, 0.06%
Rwanda
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 1, 0.06%
Slovakia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.06%
Tunisia
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.06%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.06%
|
Show all (69 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
12 profile journal articles
Brochier-Armanet Céline
144 publications,
9 150 citations
h-index: 50
4 profile journal articles
Khaitovich Philipp
PhD in Biological/biomedical sciences, Professor

Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology
141 publications,
11 873 citations
h-index: 55
4 profile journal articles
Imai Hiroo
129 publications,
4 071 citations
h-index: 32
3 profile journal articles
Mark J.
146 publications,
7 679 citations
h-index: 49
2 profile journal articles
Klepikova Anna

Institute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences
32 publications,
1 063 citations
h-index: 14
1 profile journal article
Bruce Heather
21 publications,
371 citations
h-index: 7
1 profile journal article
Khrameeva Ekaterina
36 publications,
1 396 citations
h-index: 18
1 profile journal article
Abalos Javier
11 publications,
128 citations
h-index: 5
1 profile journal article
Crudu Valeriu
🤝
86 publications,
3 232 citations
h-index: 26
1 profile journal article
Casiraghi Maurizio
92 publications,
4 545 citations
h-index: 36
1 profile journal article
Shimada Toru
PhD in Agricultural sciences, Professor

University of Tokyo

Gakushuin University
218 publications,
8 447 citations
h-index: 47
Research interests
Evolutionary genomics
Genetics
Sericulture
1 profile journal article
Marongiu Michele
93 publications,
9 449 citations
h-index: 27
1 profile journal article
Pedro Martinez
98 publications,
4 082 citations
h-index: 33
1 profile journal article
Ricardo Aldo
19 publications,
427 citations
h-index: 11