Open Access
Open access
том 15 издание 3 страницы e0230301

Comparative analysis of novel MGISEQ-2000 sequencing platform vs Illumina HiSeq 2500 for whole-genome sequencing

Тип публикацииJournal Article
Дата публикации2020-03-16
scimago Q1
wos Q2
БС1
SJR0.803
CiteScore5.4
Impact factor2.6
ISSN19326203
Multidisciplinary
Краткое описание
The MGISEQ-2000 developed by MGI Tech Co. Ltd. (a subsidiary of the BGI Group) is a new competitor of such next-generation sequencing platforms as NovaSeq and HiSeq (Illumina). Its sequencing principle is based on the DNB and the cPAS technologies, which were also used in the previous version of the BGISEQ-500 device. However, the reagents for MGISEQ-2000 have been refined and the platform utilizes updated software. The cPAS method is an advanced technology based on the cPAL previously created by Complete Genomics. In this paper, the authors compare the results of the whole-genome sequencing of a DNA sample from a Russian female donor performed on MGISEQ-2000 and Illumina HiSeq 2500 (both PE150). Two platforms were compared in terms of sequencing quality, number of errors and performance. Additionally, we performed variant calling using four different software packages: Samtools mpileaup, Strelka2, Sentieon, and GATK. The accuracy of SNP detection was similar in the data generated by MGISEQ-2000 and HiSeq 2500, which was used as a reference. At the same time, a separate indel analysis of the overall error rate revealed similar FPR values and lower sensitivity. It may be concluded with confidence that the data generated by the analyzed sequencing systems is characterized by comparable magnitudes of error and that MGISEQ-2000 and HiSeq 2500 can be used interchangeably for similar tasks like whole genome sequencing.
Найдено 
Найдено 

Топ-30

Журналы

1
2
3
4
5
6
Scientific Reports
6 публикаций, 9.09%
Frontiers in Genetics
4 публикации, 6.06%
International Journal of Legal Medicine
3 публикации, 4.55%
BMC Genomics
3 публикации, 4.55%
F1000Research
2 публикации, 3.03%
Horticulture Research
2 публикации, 3.03%
PLoS ONE
2 публикации, 3.03%
PeerJ
1 публикация, 1.52%
Cancers
1 публикация, 1.52%
Frontiers in Microbiology
1 публикация, 1.52%
Frontiers in Oncology
1 публикация, 1.52%
Frontiers in Plant Science
1 публикация, 1.52%
Frontiers in Medicine
1 публикация, 1.52%
Frontiers in Immunology
1 публикация, 1.52%
Life
1 публикация, 1.52%
Genes and Genomics
1 публикация, 1.52%
Nature Computational Science
1 публикация, 1.52%
Journal of Biosciences
1 публикация, 1.52%
npj Regenerative Medicine
1 публикация, 1.52%
Cell Stem Cell
1 публикация, 1.52%
Fundamental Research
1 публикация, 1.52%
Small Methods
1 публикация, 1.52%
American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A
1 публикация, 1.52%
Advanced Science
1 публикация, 1.52%
Drug Testing and Analysis
1 публикация, 1.52%
Aquaculture Reports
1 публикация, 1.52%
Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences
1 публикация, 1.52%
Breeding Science
1 публикация, 1.52%
Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention (Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika)
1 публикация, 1.52%
1
2
3
4
5
6

Издатели

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Springer Nature
18 публикаций, 27.27%
Frontiers Media S.A.
9 публикаций, 13.64%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
8 публикаций, 12.12%
Elsevier
5 публикаций, 7.58%
Wiley
4 публикации, 6.06%
Oxford University Press
3 публикации, 4.55%
F1000 Research
2 публикации, 3.03%
MDPI
2 публикации, 3.03%
Taylor & Francis
2 публикации, 3.03%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
2 публикации, 3.03%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2 публикации, 3.03%
PeerJ
1 публикация, 1.52%
The Korean Society of Genetics
1 публикация, 1.52%
Japanese Society of Breeding
1 публикация, 1.52%
LLC Numicom
1 публикация, 1.52%
Scientific Societies
1 публикация, 1.52%
Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS
1 публикация, 1.52%
Microbiology Society
1 публикация, 1.52%
Zhejiang University Press
1 публикация, 1.52%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
  • Мы не учитываем публикации, у которых нет DOI.
  • Статистика публикаций обновляется еженедельно.

Вы ученый?

Создайте профиль, чтобы получать персональные рекомендации коллег, конференций и новых статей.
Метрики
66
Поделиться
Цитировать
ГОСТ |
Цитировать
Korostin D. et al. Comparative analysis of novel MGISEQ-2000 sequencing platform vs Illumina HiSeq 2500 for whole-genome sequencing // PLoS ONE. 2020. Vol. 15. No. 3. p. e0230301.
ГОСТ со всеми авторами (до 50) Скопировать
Korostin D., Kulemin N., Naumov V., Belova V. A., Kwon D., Gorbachev A. Comparative analysis of novel MGISEQ-2000 sequencing platform vs Illumina HiSeq 2500 for whole-genome sequencing // PLoS ONE. 2020. Vol. 15. No. 3. p. e0230301.
RIS |
Цитировать
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0230301
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230301
TI - Comparative analysis of novel MGISEQ-2000 sequencing platform vs Illumina HiSeq 2500 for whole-genome sequencing
T2 - PLoS ONE
AU - Korostin, Dmitriy
AU - Kulemin, Nikolay
AU - Naumov, Vladimir
AU - Belova, Vera A.
AU - Kwon, Dmitriy
AU - Gorbachev, Alexey
PY - 2020
DA - 2020/03/16
PB - Public Library of Science (PLoS)
SP - e0230301
IS - 3
VL - 15
PMID - 32176719
SN - 1932-6203
ER -
BibTex |
Цитировать
BibTex (до 50 авторов) Скопировать
@article{2020_Korostin,
author = {Dmitriy Korostin and Nikolay Kulemin and Vladimir Naumov and Vera A. Belova and Dmitriy Kwon and Alexey Gorbachev},
title = {Comparative analysis of novel MGISEQ-2000 sequencing platform vs Illumina HiSeq 2500 for whole-genome sequencing},
journal = {PLoS ONE},
year = {2020},
volume = {15},
publisher = {Public Library of Science (PLoS)},
month = {mar},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230301},
number = {3},
pages = {e0230301},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0230301}
}
MLA
Цитировать
Korostin, Dmitriy, et al. “Comparative analysis of novel MGISEQ-2000 sequencing platform vs Illumina HiSeq 2500 for whole-genome sequencing.” PLoS ONE, vol. 15, no. 3, Mar. 2020, p. e0230301. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230301.