Open Access
Open access
volume 15 issue 3 pages e0230301

Comparative analysis of novel MGISEQ-2000 sequencing platform vs Illumina HiSeq 2500 for whole-genome sequencing

Dmitriy Korostin 1
Vladimir Naumov 3
Dmitriy Kwon 4
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2020-03-16
scimago Q1
wos Q2
SJR0.803
CiteScore5.4
Impact factor2.6
ISSN19326203
Multidisciplinary
Abstract
The MGISEQ-2000 developed by MGI Tech Co. Ltd. (a subsidiary of the BGI Group) is a new competitor of such next-generation sequencing platforms as NovaSeq and HiSeq (Illumina). Its sequencing principle is based on the DNB and the cPAS technologies, which were also used in the previous version of the BGISEQ-500 device. However, the reagents for MGISEQ-2000 have been refined and the platform utilizes updated software. The cPAS method is an advanced technology based on the cPAL previously created by Complete Genomics. In this paper, the authors compare the results of the whole-genome sequencing of a DNA sample from a Russian female donor performed on MGISEQ-2000 and Illumina HiSeq 2500 (both PE150). Two platforms were compared in terms of sequencing quality, number of errors and performance. Additionally, we performed variant calling using four different software packages: Samtools mpileaup, Strelka2, Sentieon, and GATK. The accuracy of SNP detection was similar in the data generated by MGISEQ-2000 and HiSeq 2500, which was used as a reference. At the same time, a separate indel analysis of the overall error rate revealed similar FPR values and lower sensitivity. It may be concluded with confidence that the data generated by the analyzed sequencing systems is characterized by comparable magnitudes of error and that MGISEQ-2000 and HiSeq 2500 can be used interchangeably for similar tasks like whole genome sequencing.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
Scientific Reports
6 publications, 9.23%
Frontiers in Genetics
4 publications, 6.15%
International Journal of Legal Medicine
3 publications, 4.62%
BMC Genomics
3 publications, 4.62%
F1000Research
2 publications, 3.08%
Horticulture Research
2 publications, 3.08%
PLoS ONE
2 publications, 3.08%
PeerJ
1 publication, 1.54%
Cancers
1 publication, 1.54%
Frontiers in Microbiology
1 publication, 1.54%
Frontiers in Oncology
1 publication, 1.54%
Frontiers in Plant Science
1 publication, 1.54%
Frontiers in Medicine
1 publication, 1.54%
Frontiers in Immunology
1 publication, 1.54%
Life
1 publication, 1.54%
Genes and Genomics
1 publication, 1.54%
Nature Computational Science
1 publication, 1.54%
Journal of Biosciences
1 publication, 1.54%
npj Regenerative Medicine
1 publication, 1.54%
Cell Stem Cell
1 publication, 1.54%
Fundamental Research
1 publication, 1.54%
Small Methods
1 publication, 1.54%
American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A
1 publication, 1.54%
Advanced Science
1 publication, 1.54%
Drug Testing and Analysis
1 publication, 1.54%
Aquaculture Reports
1 publication, 1.54%
Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences
1 publication, 1.54%
Breeding Science
1 publication, 1.54%
Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention (Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika)
1 publication, 1.54%
1
2
3
4
5
6

Publishers

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Springer Nature
17 publications, 26.15%
Frontiers Media S.A.
9 publications, 13.85%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
8 publications, 12.31%
Elsevier
5 publications, 7.69%
Wiley
4 publications, 6.15%
Oxford University Press
3 publications, 4.62%
F1000 Research
2 publications, 3.08%
MDPI
2 publications, 3.08%
Taylor & Francis
2 publications, 3.08%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
2 publications, 3.08%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2 publications, 3.08%
PeerJ
1 publication, 1.54%
The Korean Society of Genetics
1 publication, 1.54%
Japanese Society of Breeding
1 publication, 1.54%
LLC Numicom
1 publication, 1.54%
Scientific Societies
1 publication, 1.54%
Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS
1 publication, 1.54%
Microbiology Society
1 publication, 1.54%
Zhejiang University Press
1 publication, 1.54%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
65
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Korostin D. et al. Comparative analysis of novel MGISEQ-2000 sequencing platform vs Illumina HiSeq 2500 for whole-genome sequencing // PLoS ONE. 2020. Vol. 15. No. 3. p. e0230301.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Korostin D., Kulemin N., Naumov V., Belova V. A., Kwon D., Gorbachev A. Comparative analysis of novel MGISEQ-2000 sequencing platform vs Illumina HiSeq 2500 for whole-genome sequencing // PLoS ONE. 2020. Vol. 15. No. 3. p. e0230301.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0230301
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230301
TI - Comparative analysis of novel MGISEQ-2000 sequencing platform vs Illumina HiSeq 2500 for whole-genome sequencing
T2 - PLoS ONE
AU - Korostin, Dmitriy
AU - Kulemin, Nikolay
AU - Naumov, Vladimir
AU - Belova, Vera A.
AU - Kwon, Dmitriy
AU - Gorbachev, Alexey
PY - 2020
DA - 2020/03/16
PB - Public Library of Science (PLoS)
SP - e0230301
IS - 3
VL - 15
PMID - 32176719
SN - 1932-6203
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2020_Korostin,
author = {Dmitriy Korostin and Nikolay Kulemin and Vladimir Naumov and Vera A. Belova and Dmitriy Kwon and Alexey Gorbachev},
title = {Comparative analysis of novel MGISEQ-2000 sequencing platform vs Illumina HiSeq 2500 for whole-genome sequencing},
journal = {PLoS ONE},
year = {2020},
volume = {15},
publisher = {Public Library of Science (PLoS)},
month = {mar},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230301},
number = {3},
pages = {e0230301},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0230301}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Korostin, Dmitriy, et al. “Comparative analysis of novel MGISEQ-2000 sequencing platform vs Illumina HiSeq 2500 for whole-genome sequencing.” PLoS ONE, vol. 15, no. 3, Mar. 2020, p. e0230301. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230301.