Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery, volume 10, issue 5, pages 449-461
The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2015-04-02
Journal:
Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery
Quartile SCImago
Q1
Quartile WOS
Q1
Impact factor: 6.3
ISSN: 17460441, 1746045X
PubMed ID:
25835573
Abstract
Introduction: The molecular mechanics energies combined with the Poisson–Boltzmann or generalized Born and surface area continuum solvation (MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA) methods are popular approaches to estimate the free energy of the binding of small ligands to biological macromolecules. They are typically based on molecular dynamics simulations of the receptor–ligand complex and are therefore intermediate in both accuracy and computational effort between empirical scoring and strict alchemical perturbation methods. They have been applied to a large number of systems with varying success. Areas covered: The authors review the use of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to calculate ligand-binding affinities, with an emphasis on calibration, testing and validation, as well as attempts to improve the methods, rather than on specific applications. Expert opinion: MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA are attractive approaches owing to their modular nature and that they do not require calculations on a training set. They have been used successfully to reproduce and rationalize experimental findings and to improve the results of virtual screening and docking. However, they contain several crude and questionable approximations, for example, the lack of conformational entropy and information about the number and free energy of water molecules in the binding site. Moreover, there are many variants of the method and their performance varies strongly with the tested system. Likewise, most attempts to ameliorate the methods with more accurate approaches, for example, quantum-mechanical calculations, polarizable force fields or improved solvation have deteriorated the results.
Top-30
Journals
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
|
|
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
361 publications, 11.33%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
110 publications, 3.45%
|
|
Molecules
94 publications, 2.95%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
84 publications, 2.64%
|
|
Scientific Reports
77 publications, 2.42%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
54 publications, 1.7%
|
|
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
54 publications, 1.7%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry B
53 publications, 1.66%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Structure
49 publications, 1.54%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Modeling
48 publications, 1.51%
|
|
RSC Advances
45 publications, 1.41%
|
|
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
45 publications, 1.41%
|
|
ACS Omega
44 publications, 1.38%
|
|
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
42 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Liquids
37 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Molecular Diversity
37 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Computational Biology and Chemistry
37 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
33 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
33 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Computers in Biology and Medicine
33 publications, 1.04%
|
|
PLoS ONE
33 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Biomolecules
29 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Frontiers in Pharmacology
29 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
29 publications, 0.91%
|
|
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
28 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
28 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Bioorganic Chemistry
25 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Molecular Simulation
24 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Pharmaceuticals
22 publications, 0.69%
|
|
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
|
Publishers
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
|
Elsevier
627 publications, 19.69%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
441 publications, 13.85%
|
|
Springer Nature
425 publications, 13.34%
|
|
MDPI
387 publications, 12.15%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
350 publications, 10.99%
|
|
Wiley
224 publications, 7.03%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
145 publications, 4.55%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
114 publications, 3.58%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
91 publications, 2.86%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
51 publications, 1.6%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
38 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Oxford University Press
24 publications, 0.75%
|
|
16 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
11 publications, 0.35%
|
|
King Saud University
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
SAGE
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
10 publications, 0.31%
|
|
AIP Publishing
9 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Biophysical Society
8 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
8 publications, 0.25%
|
|
World Scientific
7 publications, 0.22%
|
|
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
7 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
7 publications, 0.22%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
7 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
7 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
6 publications, 0.19%
|
|
IntechOpen
6 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Portland Press
5 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
4 publications, 0.13%
|
|
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Genheden S., Ryde U. The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities // Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery. 2015. Vol. 10. No. 5. pp. 449-461.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Genheden S., Ryde U. The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities // Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery. 2015. Vol. 10. No. 5. pp. 449-461.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936
UR - https://doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936
TI - The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities
T2 - Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery
AU - Genheden, S
AU - Ryde, U
PY - 2015
DA - 2015/04/02
PB - Taylor & Francis
SP - 449-461
IS - 5
VL - 10
PMID - 25835573
SN - 1746-0441
SN - 1746-045X
ER -
Cite this
BibTex
Copy
@article{2015,
author = {S Genheden and U Ryde},
title = {The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities},
journal = {Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery},
year = {2015},
volume = {10},
publisher = {Taylor & Francis},
month = {apr},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936},
number = {5},
pages = {449--461},
doi = {10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936}
}