volume 10 issue 5 pages 449-461

The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities

Genheden S., Ryde U.
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2015-04-02
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR1.195
CiteScore10.6
Impact factor4.9
ISSN17460441, 1746045X
Abstract
Introduction: The molecular mechanics energies combined with the Poisson–Boltzmann or generalized Born and surface area continuum solvation (MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA) methods are popular approaches to estimate the free energy of the binding of small ligands to biological macromolecules. They are typically based on molecular dynamics simulations of the receptor–ligand complex and are therefore intermediate in both accuracy and computational effort between empirical scoring and strict alchemical perturbation methods. They have been applied to a large number of systems with varying success. Areas covered: The authors review the use of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to calculate ligand-binding affinities, with an emphasis on calibration, testing and validation, as well as attempts to improve the methods, rather than on specific applications. Expert opinion: MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA are attractive approaches owing to their modular nature and that they do not require calculations on a training set. They have been used successfully to reproduce and rationalize experimental findings and to improve the results of virtual screening and docking. However, they contain several crude and questionable approximations, for example, the lack of conformational entropy and information about the number and free energy of water molecules in the binding site. Moreover, there are many variants of the method and their performance varies strongly with the tested system. Likewise, most attempts to ameliorate the methods with more accurate approaches, for example, quantum-mechanical calculations, polarizable force fields or improved solvation have deteriorated the results.
Found 

Top-30

Journals

50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
400 publications, 9.79%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
137 publications, 3.35%
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
110 publications, 2.69%
Scientific Reports
106 publications, 2.6%
Molecules
102 publications, 2.5%
Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
70 publications, 1.71%
ACS Omega
64 publications, 1.57%
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
64 publications, 1.57%
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
64 publications, 1.57%
Journal of Molecular Structure
62 publications, 1.52%
Journal of Physical Chemistry B
61 publications, 1.49%
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
56 publications, 1.37%
Molecular Diversity
55 publications, 1.35%
PLoS ONE
55 publications, 1.35%
RSC Advances
52 publications, 1.27%
Computers in Biology and Medicine
52 publications, 1.27%
Computational Biology and Chemistry
51 publications, 1.25%
Journal of Molecular Modeling
50 publications, 1.22%
ChemistrySelect
45 publications, 1.1%
Journal of Molecular Liquids
41 publications, 1%
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
40 publications, 0.98%
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
38 publications, 0.93%
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
35 publications, 0.86%
Frontiers in Pharmacology
35 publications, 0.86%
Biomolecules
34 publications, 0.83%
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
33 publications, 0.81%
Pharmaceuticals
31 publications, 0.76%
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
31 publications, 0.76%
Bioorganic Chemistry
31 publications, 0.76%
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400

Publishers

100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Elsevier
868 publications, 21.25%
Springer Nature
604 publications, 14.79%
Taylor & Francis
521 publications, 12.76%
MDPI
458 publications, 11.21%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
451 publications, 11.04%
Wiley
304 publications, 7.44%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
171 publications, 4.19%
Frontiers Media S.A.
138 publications, 3.38%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
136 publications, 3.33%
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
67 publications, 1.64%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
62 publications, 1.52%
Oxford University Press
28 publications, 0.69%
World Scientific
18 publications, 0.44%
SAGE
17 publications, 0.42%
Hindawi Limited
13 publications, 0.32%
AIP Publishing
11 publications, 0.27%
Pleiades Publishing
11 publications, 0.27%
King Saud University
10 publications, 0.24%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
9 publications, 0.22%
American Society for Microbiology
9 publications, 0.22%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
9 publications, 0.22%
Walter de Gruyter
8 publications, 0.2%
Research Square Platform LLC
8 publications, 0.2%
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
7 publications, 0.17%
IntechOpen
7 publications, 0.17%
eLife Sciences Publications
6 publications, 0.15%
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
5 publications, 0.12%
Portland Press
5 publications, 0.12%
F1000 Research
4 publications, 0.1%
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
4.1k
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Genheden S., Ryde U. The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities // Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery. 2015. Vol. 10. No. 5. pp. 449-461.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Genheden S., Ryde U. The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities // Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery. 2015. Vol. 10. No. 5. pp. 449-461.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936
UR - https://doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936
TI - The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities
T2 - Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery
AU - Genheden, S
AU - Ryde, U
PY - 2015
DA - 2015/04/02
PB - Taylor & Francis
SP - 449-461
IS - 5
VL - 10
PMID - 25835573
SN - 1746-0441
SN - 1746-045X
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2015_Genheden,
author = {S Genheden and U Ryde},
title = {The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities},
journal = {Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery},
year = {2015},
volume = {10},
publisher = {Taylor & Francis},
month = {apr},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936},
number = {5},
pages = {449--461},
doi = {10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Genheden, S., and U Ryde. “The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities.” Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery, vol. 10, no. 5, Apr. 2015, pp. 449-461. https://doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936.