Open Access
Open access
volume 15 issue 4 pages 119-132

Scientometric Analysis of Scientific Publications in Cultural-Historical Psychology Research Area

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2019-12-28
scimago Q1
wos Q4
SJR0.310
CiteScore1.2
Impact factor0.7
ISSN18165435, 22248935
Developmental and Educational Psychology
Cultural Studies
Applied Psychology
Social Psychology
Psychology (miscellaneous)
Abstract

One of the significant indicators for assessing the severity of the international transfer of scientific knowledge in the field of cultural-historical psychology and the activity approach is the nature of quoting key concepts and the main representatives of the approach in foreign sources. The article provides a bibliometric analysis of publications in Russian and English in order to identify the representation of key concepts of cultural-historical psychology in Russian and international publications in scientific journals for the period 2009—2019. A bibliometric analysis of publications (scientific articles) was carried out on the basis of the Russian Scientific Index citations (RSCI), Web of Science and Google Academy. A sample of 5669 publications. A list of key concepts and names of the main representatives of the cultural-historical approach in the amount of 27 words for bibliometric analysis is determined. The list of keywords is based on an expert assessment of leading Russian experts in the field of cultural-historical psychology. The number of experts was 50 people. Indicators of the h-Index (RSCI) of experts are from 8 to 32. A positive trend is revealed in increasing the growth rate of the number of publications containing key concepts of cultural-historical psychology in both Russian and English. The importance of individual thematic areas of research within the framework of one scientific field — cultural-historical psychology is shown.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
Cultural-Historical Psychology
6 publications, 85.71%
SHS Web of Conferences
1 publication, 14.29%
1
2
3
4
5
6

Publishers

1
2
3
4
5
6
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
6 publications, 85.71%
EDP Sciences
1 publication, 14.29%
1
2
3
4
5
6
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
7
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Rubtsov V. V. et al. Scientometric Analysis of Scientific Publications in Cultural-Historical Psychology Research Area // Cultural-Historical Psychology. 2019. Vol. 15. No. 4. pp. 119-132.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Rubtsov V. V., Margolis A. A., Shvedovskaya A., Ponomareva V. Scientometric Analysis of Scientific Publications in Cultural-Historical Psychology Research Area // Cultural-Historical Psychology. 2019. Vol. 15. No. 4. pp. 119-132.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.17759/chp.2019150412
UR - https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2019150412
TI - Scientometric Analysis of Scientific Publications in Cultural-Historical Psychology Research Area
T2 - Cultural-Historical Psychology
AU - Rubtsov, V V
AU - Margolis, A A
AU - Shvedovskaya, A.A.
AU - Ponomareva, V.V.
PY - 2019
DA - 2019/12/28
PB - Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
SP - 119-132
IS - 4
VL - 15
SN - 1816-5435
SN - 2224-8935
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2019_Rubtsov,
author = {V V Rubtsov and A A Margolis and A.A. Shvedovskaya and V.V. Ponomareva},
title = {Scientometric Analysis of Scientific Publications in Cultural-Historical Psychology Research Area},
journal = {Cultural-Historical Psychology},
year = {2019},
volume = {15},
publisher = {Moscow State University of Psychology and Education},
month = {dec},
url = {https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2019150412},
number = {4},
pages = {119--132},
doi = {10.17759/chp.2019150412}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Rubtsov, V. V., et al. “Scientometric Analysis of Scientific Publications in Cultural-Historical Psychology Research Area.” Cultural-Historical Psychology, vol. 15, no. 4, Dec. 2019, pp. 119-132. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2019150412.