Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin, volume 76, issue 4, pages 239-243

Reflections of a Pessimistic Gerontologist or Why We Still Do Not Live 1000 Years

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2021-12-01
Quartile SCImago
Q4
Quartile WOS
Impact factor
ISSN00963925, 1934791X
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
General Environmental Science
Abstract
The author’s view on the current state of gerontological research is presented. He believes that the widespread departure from the principles of classical gerontology, formulated back in the 20th century, has not been reflected in the works in the field of biology of aging (both theoretical and experimental) in the best way. The neglect of the fundamental principles of gerontological research has led to the fact that, in most works, the classical definition of aging as a set of age-related changes in practically healthy individuals leading to an increase in the rate of mortality is ignored. The emphasis is on assessing the average and maximum life span of the studied organisms, even if they are ageless. Extending the lifetime of such objects cannot be considered a modification of the rate of their aging. It is emphasized that special attention is now being paid to molecular age-related changes, which some gerontologists consider aging, although this is just its possible mechanism or consequence. However, geroprotectors are very often studied exactly by assessing the modification of the rate of such age-related changes. At the same time, as classical gerontology rightly believes, the principles of which the author urges to adhere to, without taking the survival curves of the control and experimental cohorts, it is impossible to draw a correct conclusion about whether the studied compound is a geroprotector. At the same time, an approach to the formation of such cohorts, including an assessment of the minimum required number of organisms in them, as well as the “quality” of their health, is very important. Several gerontological articles that have been published in the most highly ranked scientific journals and, therefore, have attracted much attention of relevant specialists are considered. This attention was expressed, among other things, in the high citation rate of these works, although they were performed with significant violations of the principles of classical gerontology, which were subsequently identified by other researchers. It is also emphasized that, at present, the rating of a scientific journal for many gerontological readers has become much more important than the correctness of the results and ideas presented in the article. A list of methodological problems is given, which, according to the author, not only complicate the situation with modern gerontological research but also make tangible progress in this area practically unattainable.

Citations by journals

1
2
3
Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 16. Biologiya
Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 16. Biologiya, 3, 42.86%
Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 16. Biologiya
3 publications, 42.86%
Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin
Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin, 2, 28.57%
Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin
2 publications, 28.57%
Advances in Gerontology
Advances in Gerontology, 2, 28.57%
Advances in Gerontology
2 publications, 28.57%
1
2
3

Citations by publishers

1
2
3
4
Pleiades Publishing
Pleiades Publishing, 4, 57.14%
Pleiades Publishing
4 publications, 57.14%
Moscow University Press
Moscow University Press, 3, 42.86%
Moscow University Press
3 publications, 42.86%
1
2
3
4
  • We do not take into account publications that without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.
Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Khokhlov A. N. Reflections of a Pessimistic Gerontologist or Why We Still Do Not Live 1000 Years // Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin. 2021. Vol. 76. No. 4. pp. 239-243.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Khokhlov A. N. Reflections of a Pessimistic Gerontologist or Why We Still Do Not Live 1000 Years // Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin. 2021. Vol. 76. No. 4. pp. 239-243.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.3103/S0096392521040040
UR - https://doi.org/10.3103%2FS0096392521040040
TI - Reflections of a Pessimistic Gerontologist or Why We Still Do Not Live 1000 Years
T2 - Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin
AU - Khokhlov, A N
PY - 2021
DA - 2021/12/01 00:00:00
PB - Pleiades Publishing
SP - 239-243
IS - 4
VL - 76
SN - 0096-3925
SN - 1934-791X
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex Copy
@article{2021_Khokhlov
author = {A N Khokhlov},
title = {Reflections of a Pessimistic Gerontologist or Why We Still Do Not Live 1000 Years},
journal = {Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin},
year = {2021},
volume = {76},
publisher = {Pleiades Publishing},
month = {dec},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3103%2FS0096392521040040},
number = {4},
pages = {239--243},
doi = {10.3103/S0096392521040040}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Khokhlov, A. N.. “Reflections of a Pessimistic Gerontologist or Why We Still Do Not Live 1000 Years.” Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin, vol. 76, no. 4, Dec. 2021, pp. 239-243. https://doi.org/10.3103%2FS0096392521040040.
Found error?