Towards inclusive funding practices for early career researchers
Securing research funding is a challenge faced by most scientists in academic institutions worldwide. Funding success rates for all career stages are low, but the burden falls most heavily on early career researchers (ECRs) - young investigators in training and new principal investigators - who have a shorter track record and are dependent on funding to establish their academic career. The low number of career development awards and the lack of sustained research funding results in the loss of ECR talent in academia. Several steps in the current funding process, from grant conditions to the review process, play significant roles in the distribution of funds. Furthermore, there is an imbalance among certain research disciplines and labs of influential researchers that receive more funding. As a group of ECRs with global representation, we examined funding practices, barriers, facilitators, and alternatives to the current funding systems to diversify risk or award grants on a partly random basis. Based on our discussions, research, and collective opinions, we detail recommendations for funding agencies and grant reviewers to improve ECR funding prospects worldwide and promote a fairer and more inclusive funding landscape for ECRs.
Топ-30
Журналы
|
1
|
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
1 публикация, 16.67%
|
|
|
Scientometrics
1 публикация, 16.67%
|
|
|
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
1 публикация, 16.67%
|
|
|
General and Comparative Endocrinology
1 публикация, 16.67%
|
|
|
ICES Journal of Marine Science
1 публикация, 16.67%
|
|
|
1
|
Издатели
|
1
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 публикация, 16.67%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
1 публикация, 16.67%
|
|
|
Wiley
1 публикация, 16.67%
|
|
|
Elsevier
1 публикация, 16.67%
|
|
|
Oxford University Press
1 публикация, 16.67%
|
|
|
1
|
- Мы не учитываем публикации, у которых нет DOI.
- Статистика публикаций обновляется еженедельно.