E-Learning perception and satisfaction among health sciences students amid the COVID-19 pandemic
BACKGROUND: E-learning is increasingly used during the COVID-19 pandemic, however the impact of this change on students is not known. This study aimed to evaluate perception and satisfaction of health sciences students towards E-learning during the COVID-19 lockdown. METHODS: A structured questionnaire was distributed to 2000 health care students either through email or social media platforms. The questionnaire was divided into two sections: the first section addressed demographic information such as age, education level, course of study, number of lectures attended and country. The second section gathered information on perception and satisfaction of students using 13 close-ended questions. Frequencies and percentages were assessed for demographic data, perception and satisfaction level of students. The paired sample t-test, independent t test and Spearman correlation were applied to evaluate statistical significance between different variables of the study. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Data from 1255 participants were included at a response rate of 66.4%. More than one third (37%) of the students took 25 or more online E-learning sessions and 47% preferred Zoom as an online platform. Participants belonged to 11 countries from developed and developing nations. 41% reported interference of E-learning due to network problems. 60% considered that clinical and practical skills are best learned in clinics and laboratories. More than one third of the students preferred classroom teaching and 34% of the students did not feel confident enough to take exit exams after E-learning sessions. CONCLUSION: E-learning satisfaction levels were better among developed countries (7.34) compared to developing countries (5.82). The majority of participants agreed that E-learning was satisfactory in acquiring knowledge, however not effective in acquiring clinical and technical skills. As the COVID-19 lockdown eases, there is a need for improvement in the methods employed in E-learning and more blended learning among healthcare students is recommended.
Топ-30
Журналы
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
|
|
Work
11 публикаций, 8.09%
|
|
|
BMC Medical Education
6 публикаций, 4.41%
|
|
|
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
5 публикаций, 3.68%
|
|
|
Sustainability
4 публикации, 2.94%
|
|
|
Healthcare
4 публикации, 2.94%
|
|
|
Nurse Education in Practice
4 публикации, 2.94%
|
|
|
PLoS ONE
3 публикации, 2.21%
|
|
|
European Journal of Dental Education
3 публикации, 2.21%
|
|
|
MedEdPublish
2 публикации, 1.47%
|
|
|
JMIR Medical Education
2 публикации, 1.47%
|
|
|
Dentistry Journal
2 публикации, 1.47%
|
|
|
Learning Environments Research
2 публикации, 1.47%
|
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
2 публикации, 1.47%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
2 публикации, 1.47%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
2 публикации, 1.47%
|
|
|
Procedia Computer Science
2 публикации, 1.47%
|
|
|
Journal of Medical Education
2 публикации, 1.47%
|
|
|
American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education
2 публикации, 1.47%
|
|
|
Educacion Medica
2 публикации, 1.47%
|
|
|
Journal of Education and Health Promotion
2 публикации, 1.47%
|
|
|
Pédagogie médicale
1 публикация, 0.74%
|
|
|
JBI Evidence Implementation
1 публикация, 0.74%
|
|
|
European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education
1 публикация, 0.74%
|
|
|
PeerJ
1 публикация, 0.74%
|
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
1 публикация, 0.74%
|
|
|
Education Sciences
1 публикация, 0.74%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
1 публикация, 0.74%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Medicine
1 публикация, 0.74%
|
|
|
Medical Science Educator
1 публикация, 0.74%
|
|
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
Издатели
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
|
|
|
Elsevier
19 публикаций, 13.97%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
17 публикаций, 12.5%
|
|
|
MDPI
15 публикаций, 11.03%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
10 публикаций, 7.35%
|
|
|
SAGE
8 публикаций, 5.88%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
6 публикаций, 4.41%
|
|
|
Wiley
6 публикаций, 4.41%
|
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
5 публикаций, 3.68%
|
|
|
IOS Press
4 публикации, 2.94%
|
|
|
JMIR Publications
4 публикации, 2.94%
|
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
4 публикации, 2.94%
|
|
|
Brieflands
4 публикации, 2.94%
|
|
|
Medknow
3 публикации, 2.21%
|
|
|
F1000 Research
2 публикации, 1.47%
|
|
|
American Physiological Society
2 публикации, 1.47%
|
|
|
IGI Global
2 публикации, 1.47%
|
|
|
Scientific Scholar
2 публикации, 1.47%
|
|
|
EDP Sciences
1 публикация, 0.74%
|
|
|
PeerJ
1 публикация, 0.74%
|
|
|
University of Cincinnati - Office of Innovation and Community Engagement
1 публикация, 0.74%
|
|
|
Edizioni Minerva Medica
1 публикация, 0.74%
|
|
|
BMJ
1 публикация, 0.74%
|
|
|
Anadolu University
1 публикация, 0.74%
|
|
|
King Saud University
1 публикация, 0.74%
|
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
1 публикация, 0.74%
|
|
|
SciELO
1 публикация, 0.74%
|
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1 публикация, 0.74%
|
|
|
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
1 публикация, 0.74%
|
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
1 публикация, 0.74%
|
|
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
|
- Мы не учитываем публикации, у которых нет DOI.
- Статистика публикаций обновляется еженедельно.