Learning Environments Research
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
2.7
SJR
1.046
CiteScore
6.7
Categories
Communication
Education
E-learning
Developmental and Educational Psychology
Areas
Psychology
Social Sciences
Years of issue
2000-2001, 2003-2025
journal names
Learning Environments Research
LEARNING ENVIRON RES
Top-3 citing journals

Learning Environments Research
(1602 citations)

Frontiers in Psychology
(212 citations)

Teaching and Teacher Education
(177 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Curtin University
(101 publications)

Utrecht University
(16 publications)

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
(13 publications)

Curtin University
(21 publications)

Texas A&M University
(6 publications)

University of Waikato
(5 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 547
Q3

Quantitative Assessments of the Liquefaction Hazard of Soils considering Possible Strong Earthquakes in Seismically Active Regions of Russia
Zaalishvili V.B., Chernov Y.K., Chernov A.Y.
Q3
Open Construction and Building Technology Journal
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
Introduction
The seismogenic liquefaction of the soil poses a great hazard to society and the environment. Therefore, it is actively studied in many countries. In Russian engineering and seismological practice, this area is not sufficiently developed. The deterministic approach still prevails in Russian research on this topic. More modern probabilistic estimates are very rare.
Methods
This paper describes examples of both deterministic and probabilistic assessments of the seismogenic liquefaction hazard performed in certain areas of the Russian territory with different seismogeological conditions. Deterministic estimates were made using the Iwasaki-Seed-Finn methods and their modifications. Probability distribution functions of a random variable, the “seismic potential of liquefaction” (SPL), were developed for probabilistic estimates. These functions are regional in nature and take into account two types of uncertainties. The first is the uncertainty in achieving “critical” values by the SPL value in the event of potentially dangerous earthquake sources for a given location. The second is the uncertainty in the very occurrence of these sources in a given place for a given period of time. The “critical” SPL values are determined by the strength properties of the site soils. All estimates are based on multivariate calculations using various models of strong ground motions and seismicity. In all cases, the probability of liquefaction of water-saturated sandy and sandy-loam deposits was estimated which were found near the seabed and at depths of up to 80 m in the waters of Pogibi cape (the coast of Sakhalin island), in the districts of Sochi and Novorossiysk, as well as in land conditions (Stavropol, Krasnodar).
Results
The results of the research made it possible to correctly (at the quantitative level) take into account this component of the seismic hazard of the studied territories.
Conclusion
The variants of practical use of the obtained data are offered. An assessment of the possibilities and limitations of the developed methodology is made, and ways to improve it are outlined.
Q3

Developing the Learning Curve Model to Enhance Construction Project Scheduling and Cost Estimating
Salman A., Sodangi M.
Q3
Open Construction and Building Technology Journal
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
Aim
The aim of the study is to develop a scheduling and cost estimation model for repetitive construction units by applying the learning curve theory and to contribute to advancements in construction project management practices, promoting efficiency and competitiveness within the industry.
Background
Construction projects, particularly those with repetitive units like housing developments, face ongoing challenges in accurate scheduling and cost estimation. Traditional estimation methods often overlook the impact of learning effects, which can improve productivity and reduce costs as crews gain experience. Learning curve theory, widely applied in manufacturing, offers a framework to model these gains in construction settings. Integrating learning curves into project planning has the potential to enhance accuracy in forecasting timelines and budgets, ultimately improving project efficiency and resource management.
Objective
The objective of this study is to develop and apply a learning curve model to enhance scheduling and cost estimation in repetitive construction projects, particularly in a multi-unit housing project.
Methods
By incorporating historical data and analyzing critical factors that impact project duration and cost, a more reliable forecasting model is developed. The learning curves are created using a three-point approach, supported by artificial neural networks (ANN) and the relative importance index (RII), to systematically assess cost divisions and influential project factors.
Results
The results indicate that the learning curve model can achieve time savings of 27% and labor cost savings of 36% compared to traditional estimation methods that do not consider the effect of the learning curve in construction projects.
Conclusion
This research demonstrates that learning curve models, combined with advanced data analysis techniques, provide a robust framework for optimizing project schedules and budgets, ultimately leading to more efficient resource utilization and cost-effective project outcomes. In other words, the study presented in this paper is significant as it can lead to improved project outcomes, cost savings, better resource management, and overall advancement in the construction industry's practices and competitiveness. This approach allows for accurate scheduling and cost forecasting based on data-driven insights.
Q3

Towards Zero Carbon Buildings: Overcoming the Financial Constraints to the Adoption of Biogenic Building Materials
Sodangi M.
Q3
Open Construction and Building Technology Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
Introduction
The adoption of biogenic building materials is an important step towards decarbonizing the construction industry. However, a number of constraints limit their wider adoption in the industry.
Objective
To determine and analyse the financial constraints (FC) to the adoption of biogenic building materials; examine how they relate to one another; and provide strategy for overcoming the constraints to promote wider utilization of the materials in building construction.
Methods
The data for the study was obtained using methodical review of related literature and expert-based survey while the results were analysed using the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) technique.
Results
The findings indicate that the most critical constraints with the strongest level of cause on other FC are high initial costs of materials (FC3), high design & production cost of the materials (FC4), lack of standardization & certification (FC7), difficulty in upscaling production (FC1), and limited access to capital and financing options (FC8).
Conclusion
This study contributes to advancing knowledge in sustainable construction practices by determining and understanding the specific financial constraints that impede the widespread adoption of biogenic building materials within the construction industry. By addressing these constraints, the study promotes sustainable practices within the construction sector, contributing to environmental conservation and resource efficiency.
Q3

Analyzing the Critical Impediments to Retrofitting Historic Buildings to Achieve Net Zero Emissions
Sodangi M., Salman A.
Q3
Open Construction and Building Technology Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
Aim
The aim of this study is to introduce the critical impediments to historic building retrofitting that can be specifically tailored and applied to managing historic building protection while also achieving net zero emissions and improving the sustainability of the buildings.
Background
Despite the various calls advocating for the sustainable retrofitting of historic buildings to reduce carbon emissions and enhance energy efficiency, the extent of possible alterations that can be made to historic buildings is restricted because of their historical, architectural, and cultural significance, which is one of the many critical impediments of retrofitting historic buildings. While there are existing studies that focus on identifying some of the impediments to retrofitting historic buildings, most of these studies did not systematically examine the interrelationships among these impediments. An effective retrofit of historic structures can be greatly influenced by having a proper understanding of how various impediments interrelate with one another.
Objective
The objective of this study is to identify, analyze, and prioritize the critical impediments to historic building retrofitting to improve their sustainability and attain net zero emissions.
Methods
The data for the study was gathered using a systematic review of related literature and expert-based survey, while the results were analyzed using the interpretive structural modelling (ISM) technique.
Results
Based on the study findings, the top-ranking impediments that have the greatest impact on other impediments and are crucial in projects for retrofitting historic buildings are “high costs of retrofit projects,” “poor stakeholders' engagement and coordinated efforts,” and “disparity between the buildings' energy efficiency levels & historical significance.”
Conclusion
The study reported in this paper fills an existing gap in the literature, which also offers useful insights into a crucial area of managing historic building conservation and enhancing energy performance. The major managerial implication of this research is the need for strategic planning and decision-making. Policymakers and heritage conservation practitioners should carefully consider the study findings to create a comprehensive strategy that successfully addresses the critical impediments that have been identified. Thus, future research can investigate how historical authenticity and values can be preserved while enhancing energy efficiency and cutting emissions through the integration of sustainable retrofitting approaches with preservation initiatives.
Q3

Evaluation of the Performance of Concrete Reinforced with Bamboo and Incorporating Cassava Peel Ash
Awolusi T.F., James A.O., Emmanuel B.O., Abdallah M., Abu James G., Kunle A.E., Azab M.
Q3
Open Construction and Building Technology Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
Introduction
The main materials utilized in the production of reinforced concrete are aggregates, cement, and steel. The production of steel and cement contributes to the generation of carbon dioxide emissions, which is a main cause of global warming.
Methods
To further enhance sustainability in the construction industry, this study focuses on utilizing alternative sustainable materials in bamboo-reinforced concrete containing cassava peel ash (BRC-CPA) by fully replacing steel with bamboo strips and partially replacing cement with cassava peel ash. The experimental phase includes material characterization for the cassava peel ash (CPA) and bamboo reinforcements. Eighty-nine samples of BRC-CPA beams with dimensions 100×150×500 mm were produced, and bamboo strips of three different sizes, 12, 14, and 16 mm, were prepared and used as reinforcement in the BRC-CPA beams to evaluate their flexural strength and flexural strain. In addition, 12 samples of 150 mm cassava peel ash-blended concrete (CPAC) cubes without bamboo strips were produced. The cassava peel ash was used to partially replace cement at three levels, 0, 10, and 20%, to evaluate their influence on the compressive strength and water absorption of concrete cube samples.
Results
The addition of CPA slightly reduced the compressive strength of CPAC cubes, with values of 23.4 N/mm², 22.2 N/mm², and 21.4 N/mm² observed for 0%, 10%, and 20% CPA replacement levels, respectively. However, incorporating CPA had a positive effect by reducing water absorption and narrowing the flexural crack width in BRC-CPA beams. The flexural strength of BRC-CPA beams increased as the concrete aged, but decreased as the bamboo reinforcement size increased. Notably, at 20% CPA replacement, the flexural strength was less influenced by the bamboo strip size compared to beams with 0% CPA.
Conclusion
Based on experimental results obtained for compressive strength, flexural strength, and flexural crack width, cassava peel ash at 10% replacement and bamboo strips of size 14 mm were recommended for use in BRC-CPA for concrete structural elements such as beams, columns, and slabs.
Q3

Corrigendum to: Integrated Approach of Retrofitting an Existing Residential Building to a Nearly Zero Energy Building with Simultaneous Seismic Upgrading
Pamboris G., Chrysostomou C.Z., Kalogirou S.A., Christodoulides P.
Q3
Open Construction and Building Technology Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
Q3

A Comprehensive Review of the Factors and Strategies to Mitigate Construction Projects Delays in Saudi Arabia
Alshammari A., Ghazali F.E.
Q3
Open Construction and Building Technology Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
Background
The construction industry in Saudi Arabia faces numerous challenges that hinder its progress due to frequent and prolonged project delays.
Objective
The specific objectives of this study are (1) (1) To analyze the factors contributing to construction project delays in Saudi Arabia, (2) To identify the risk of factors contributing to construction project delays, and (3) To propose strategies to mitigate construction project delays in Saudi Arabia.
Methods
The study reviewed 16 articles to identify and suggest solutions for construction project delays in Saudi Arabia.
Results
There are 140 factors of delay found and seven pose unacceptable risks including delays due to material delivery, delays in approval of submittals, design drawings, shop drawings, and sample materials (making decisions), delays related to subcontractors work, inflation and escalation of material prices (changes in price), lack of coordination with contractors, shortage of construction materials (non-availability of material), and equipment shortages. The risk assessment can be conducted using the Bowtie diagram, scenario analysis, MRM, and MCS separately or collectively to get a new and improved model.
Conclusion
This review will contribute to the development of strategies to enhance the performance of ongoing and future construction projects in the region. Additionally, decision-makers can utilize the outcomes to strategically allocate resources and improve construction project success.
Q3

Eigen-6c4 Gravity and Alos Palsar Radar Data Integration for Delineating Geological Lineaments in North Ghadames Basin, NW Libya
Trepil F., Muztaza N.M., Abir I.A., Saleem M., Abuwoden I., Adewumi T.
Q3
Open Construction and Building Technology Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
Introduction
The ambiguity regarding the geological interpretation has the potential to be significantly decreased with the use of remote sensing, geophysical data, and the history of geology.
Aims
The objective of this work is to delineate geological lineaments and faults using EIGEN-6C4 satellite gravity and ALOS PALSAR radar data in the north Ghadames basin, of northwest Libya.
Methods
The satellite gravity dataset of the study region was used to perform a complete Bouguer anomaly map of the study area to start the gravity interpretation. Then different filters were performed on the gravity dataset, such as the total horizontal gradient (THG), CET grid analysis, 3-dimensional Euler solution (ED), and a tilt derivative (TDR) using the commercial Oasis Montaj programme. The techniques of edge identification (THG, TDR, and also CET grid analysis) are utilised for locating and identifying the boundaries or edges of geological structures that contribute to gravity anomalies. The 3-dimensional Euler solution, in conjunction with the TDR method, is employed to precisely figure out the positions and estimated depths associated with subsurface sources. Radiometric calibration, speckle filtering, and geometric correction were applied to preprocess the ALOS PALSAR L 1.1 image via the Sentinel Application Platform (SNAP) software. For automatic extraction, the PCI Geomatica software's LINE module was applied.
Results
The gravity data results indicate that the main trends of the identified geological lineaments are oriented in the North-South, East-West, Northwest-Southeast, and North-Northwest to South-Southeast directions. Furthermore, the depths of the sources observed underneath the study region differ from 250 m to 2750 m. The orientation of extracted lineaments from the ALOS PALSAR L1.1 images, specifically the horizontal-horizontal as well as horizontal-vertical polarisation images, predominantly have orientations in the north-south, north-northeast to south-southwest, east-west, north-northwest to south-southeast, and northeast-southwest directions within the study area.
Conclusion
All these findings of lineaments are associated with the tectonic features of the area. Consequently, identifying these lineaments/faults is important to reduce the ambiguity of geological interpretation and provide more information on the dominant trends for future exploration activities in the study region.
Q3

Classifying Ground Rippability and Weathering Grades in a Sedimentary Rock Geological Environment Using Seismic Refraction Survey
Rosli N., Rahman N., Tonnizam E., Saad R., Rosli A., Dahisam M.A., Hasbollah D.Z., Slamat F., Suparmanto E.K., Legiman M.K.
Q3
Open Construction and Building Technology Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
Introduction
An in-depth understanding of the ground subsurface is crucial for foundation design and excavation works and for avoiding potential hazards during land development. In this regard, the ground rippability and weathering grades are some of the ground information needed. While geotechnical works are preferred, their limited horizontal coverage and high cost are often constraints that limit their use.
Aims
To counter this, a geophysical survey is employed for its wider area coverage and cost-efficiency. Therefore, this study used the seismic refraction method to assess the rippability and weathering grades in a sedimentary rock geological setting (interbedded sandstone, siltstone, and shale) as a preliminary ground assessment.
Methods
A seismic refraction survey was carried out using Aktiebolaget Elektrisk Malmletning (ABEM) Terraloc Pro 2, where the survey line was 115m long. Rippability was obtained by correlating seismic values with the Caterpillar D10R rippability table. Meanwhile, the weathering grades of the ground were determined by correlating the study area with another study area of a similar geological setting.
Results
Within the 39m penetration depth, three layers can be classified from the ground’s P-wave velocity values and D10R Caterpillar rippability chart, which include rippable, marginal, and non-rippable layers. A break in the continuous ground layers could be seen, causing lower velocity values to be sandwiched between high velocities, which signified the presence of fracture. The weathering grades were also successfully classified from the seismic velocity values.
Conclusion
Using seismic refraction method, this study successfully employed seismic velocity values in determining the rippability and weathering grades of interbedded sedimentary rock without borehole record.
Q3

A Comprehensive Review on Effects of Material Composition, Mix Design, and Mixing Regimes on Rheology of 3D-Printed Geopolymer Concrete
Barve P., Bahrami A., Shah S.
Q3
Open Construction and Building Technology Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
Recent years have witnessed a significant growth in the research and development of additive manufacturing methods involving concrete and cementitious materials, with technologies like three-dimensional (3D) printing becoming more widely used in the construction industry. Construction has the possibility to be revolutionized, not only in the context of cost savings but also in the context of increased sustainability and functionality. 3D printing of concrete is a cutting-edge technology that has the potential to speed up construction, reduce labor costs, give architects more creative freedom, improve precision, obviate requirements for formwork, and result in less construction wastes. In addition, 3D printing can be a long-term solution for both economy and environment. Even though 3D printing in concrete has made tremendous strides recently, developing an effective 3D-printable material that decreases material usage and enhances performance is critical for carbon dioxide reduction. Robust geopolymer formulations for 3D printing concrete technology in current construction applications have emerged as the subject of much research among scientists to find novel ways to circumvent this constraint. This study intends to highlight the current state of the art in developing 3D-Printed Geopolymer Concrete (3DPGC) with a comprehensive review related to the material composition, mix design, and mixing regimes on rheology of 3DPGC. The rheology of 3DPGC in terms of printability and buildability is discussed. The mixing regimes employed for the preparation of one-part and two-part 3DPGC are tabulated and commented on. Lastly, the research gaps are identified and summarized, and several research directions are also provided for future investigations to expedite the ubiquitous use of 3DPGC in versatile construction applications.
Q3

The Effectiveness of Eugenia Oleina in Protecting Tropical Residual Slope from Excessive Shear Failure
Duraisamy Y., Othman R., Sulaiman M.A., Jaya R.P., Taib S.N., Rodzif I.H., Kambali K.
Q3
Open Construction and Building Technology Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
Introduction
Slope stability and soil erosion are major concerns in geotechnical engineering and land management. This research investigates the relationship between soil type and root systems in stabilizing slopes.
Methods
The main aim is to measure the effectiveness of Eugenia Oleina as a bioengineering technique for slope protection. Laboratory tests were conducted to measure soil shear strength, root properties, and the factor of safety (FOS) of tropical slopes before and after plant root implementation.
Results
Results revealed significant differences in cohesion and angle of friction values between unrooted and rooted soil. Apart from that, it was observed that as the root diameter increased, the tensile strength decreased when the applied force increased. The FOS of unrooted soil was higher than rooted soil, indicating greater stability without any vegetation. Furthermore, this study also evaluated the use of bio-anchorage to prevent soil erosion, considering factors such as soil composition, vegetation, and external loads. Finite element analysis was carried out using Plaxis 3D simulations to assess the effectiveness of Eugenia Oleina in controlling slope erosion.
Conclusion
This study contributes valuable insights in choosing suitable plant species for erosion control in tropical soil and guides soil bioengineering practices for slope stability in various soil conditions.
Q3

The Investigation of Stability on Slopes Utilizing Reinforcement Gabion Walls and Concrete Piles for Mitigating Landslide Disasters
Chairullah B., Sungkar M., Munirwan R.P., Jamaluddin K., Ramadhani F.F., Jaya R.P.
Q3
Open Construction and Building Technology Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
Introduction
Landslides frequently occur along roads crossing mountainous terrain during the rainy season, posing a significant risk of severe disruption to land transportation routes. Efficient and accurate resolutions are essential in managing landslides to facilitate immediate transportation recovery, such as gabion walls and pile installation.
Aim
This article aimed to evaluate the effect of installing gabions and piles for safety measures on the stability of slope landslides. The analysis of slope stability was performed utilizing the Plaxis 2D software. For reinforced slopes, the Safety Factor (SF) value utilized as a benchmark for evaluating slope stability was SF ≥ 1.5.
Methods
An assessment of the stability of the slope was conducted under three conditions: its original state, after reinforcement with gabions, and after the integration of gabions with mini piles. The dimensions of the gabion setting, as determined by the L-W-H notation (length-width- height), were 2 m x 1m x 0.5 m and 1 m x 2 m x 0.5 m. The pile was designed to be 2.5 m long at the gabion's end. The analysis was conducted at 45°, 60°, 70°, and 90° slopes.
Results
Based on the results of slope stability calculations, an SF = 1.11 was determined under no reinforcement conditions. By applying reinforced gabion walls measuring 2 m in width combined with mini piles at a 45° slope, the best SF was achieved, which was 2.58.
Conclusion
Given the comparable topographical circumstances, it is expected that the outcomes of this analysis on slope stability will be applicable in mitigating the occurrence of landslides.
Q3

Integrated Approach of Retrofitting an Existing Residential Building to a Nearly Zero Energy Building with Simultaneous Seismic Upgrading
Pamboris G., Christis Z. C., Kalogirou S.A., Paul C.
Q3
Open Construction and Building Technology Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 1
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
Introduction
The current study's goal is to apply an integrated approach of retrofitting a typical building in Cyprus that was designed and constructed for the refugee settlements in the period 1975-1985. The existing building is retrofitted to a nearly zero-energy building.
Methods
This typical type of building examined represents approximately 15,347 houses and stands for 3.57% of households in Cyprus. This percentage is considered significant with regards to energy consumption, as this type of structure has an estimated energy consumption of 1000 kWh/m2/y and CO2 emissions of 293.74kg CO2/m2/y. This corresponds to 0.293 Mt CO2/y, which stands for 4.18% of total CO2 emissions in Cyprus for 2011, based on the latest IEA (International Energy Agency) data. An integrated approach is followed for the retrofitting of the existing building, which involves both energy and structural upgrades, taking into account the earthquake resistance upgrade. Since Cyprus is in a highly seismic region, an important factor in this approach is the ability of the structure to survive a strong earthquake during its remaining lifetime, according to the design criteria. The study presents and discusses three possible coalitions with multiple scenarios of approaching the upgrade of the existing building. In each coalition, various criteria and implementation actions are considered based on the energy consumption, the CO2 footprint, and the seismic resistance.
Results
The study also investigates whether the extension of life expectancy of the existing structure through earthquake resistance upgrade will have a positive or negative effect on the CO2 life cycle footprint and cost of the building. Results show that for the examined typical building, simultaneous energy and earthquake resistance upgrade is more efficient in terms of cost and environmental impact. The building with the smallest construction age had the smallest Decision-Making Index (DMI) from the A, B and C coalitions.
Conclusion
It is important that for an existing building, the option to remain in its original state (coalition A) without any upgrading intervention is not the most favorable option. Therefore, the need to evaluate the existing building stock and plan the upgrade of the buildings in question is of utmost importance.
Q3

Fire Resistance of Lightweight Aggregate Concrete Containing Spent Garnet as Partial Fine Aggregate Replacement
Jaafar M.F., Muthusamy K., Jamaludin N.F., Jasni S.A., Zulkarnain F.
Q3
Open Construction and Building Technology Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
Introduction
The escalating demand for concrete, driven by global infrastructure development, poses significant challenges to environmental sustainability due to the depletion of natural resources and the accumulation of waste materials. This paper explores the potential of utilizing waste materials, particularly palm oil clinker (POC) and spent garnets, as sustainable alternatives in concrete production. The depletion of natural aggregates, such as river sand, coupled with the environmental hazards associated with waste disposal, underscores the urgent need for eco-friendly solutions in construction materials. POC, derived from palm oil production waste, and spent garnets from abrasive industries offer promising avenues for reducing environmental impact and enhancing sustainability in concrete production. By addressing the dual challenges of resource depletion and waste management, this research aims to contribute to developing greener construction practices and mitigating environmental degradation.
Aims
This study aims to investigate the effects of incorporating spent garnet as a partial fine aggregate replacement on the fire resistance of POC LWAC. By examining the interplay between spent garnet inclusion and fire resistance, the research contributes to developing more sustainable concrete formulations and aids in industrial waste management practices, addressing critical societal and environmental challenges.
Methods
This study investigates the effects of elevated temperatures on the compressive strength and durability of POC LWAC specimens. Concrete specimens were demoulded after 24 hours of curing and submerged in water for 28 days. Compressive strength and water absorption tests were conducted at the end of the curing period. Subsequently, specimens were subjected to temperatures of 300 °C, 500 °C, and 700 °C for 1 hour in a furnace. After cooling naturally for 24 hours, visual inspection, mass reduction analysis, and evaluation of residual compressive strength were performed.
Results
Results indicate that 20% garnet replacement yields the highest compressive strength due to pore filling and denser structure. Higher garnet levels lead to reduced strength and increased water absorption. Visual assessment post-heating shows surface alterations, with 20% garnet exhibiting the lowest mass loss and strength reduction at elevated temperatures.
Conclusion
Notably, specimens containing 20% spent garnet in POC LWAC performed better in a fire than others, enhancing their fire-resistant properties. In summary, this research introduces a hopeful approach to improve the sustainability of concrete and mitigate the environmental repercussions of industrial waste.
Q3

Investigation of Unsaturated Soil Hydraulic Properties for Subgrade Improvement using Marble Dust Waste
Hafiz H., Kechik F.A., Ibrahim A., Taib A.M., Hasbollah D.Z., Dan@Azlan M.F.
Q3
Open Construction and Building Technology Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 1
,

Open Access
|
Abstract
Introduction
The distribution of suction, which has implications for seepage and shear strength, plays a crucial role in determining the stability of unsaturated soil. The Air Entry Value (AEV) and Residual Water Contents (RWC) change over time to create the Soil-Water Characteristic Curve (SWCC), which is very important for figuring out how the suction is distributed. During a flood occurrence, the subgrade becomes inundated with water, leading to adverse effects on the AEV and RWC of the subgrade. Consequently, the performance of the subgrade is diminished. This study focuses on the use of Marble Dust Waste (MDW) as an addition to the subgrade to improve the strength of the subgrade.
Aims
This study aims to investigate the variations in air AEV in relation to the optimal MDW in unsaturated soil found in Malaysia.
Methods
The study uses control samples and soil that has been mixed with different amounts of MDW: 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25%. The SWCC is generated using the pressure plate extractor device.
Results
The results indicate a significant increase in the AEV for the mixed soil sample when compared to the control sample. While the soil-MDW mixture containing 5% of this material has an AEV value of 23 kPa, the control sample's value is 10 kPa.
Conclusion
The findings of the study suggest that the utilization of MDW yields a beneficial influence on the AEV, hence potentially improving the performance of the subgrade. The researchers aim to evaluate the potentially dangerous waste and convert it into a substance that is appropriate for engineering applications. This study provides empirical evidence that aligns with the objectives outlined in Chapter 8 of the 12th Malaysia Plan for the period 2021–2025. The topic under discussion pertains to environmental sustainability, specifically focusing on enhancing the ability to withstand the adverse effects of climate change and disasters, as well as the Green Technology Master Plan Malaysia 2017–2030, with a specific emphasis on Chapter 6, which addresses the issue of waste management.
Top-100
Citing journals
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
|
Learning Environments Research
1602 citations, 13%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
212 citations, 1.72%
|
|
Teaching and Teacher Education
177 citations, 1.44%
|
|
Education Sciences
175 citations, 1.42%
|
|
Sustainability
134 citations, 1.09%
|
|
Studies in Educational Evaluation
121 citations, 0.98%
|
|
Learning and Instruction
108 citations, 0.88%
|
|
Handbook of Research on Teaching Methods in Language Translation and Interpretation
108 citations, 0.88%
|
|
International Journal of Science Education
106 citations, 0.86%
|
|
Research in Science Education
103 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Education and Information Technologies
100 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Social Psychology of Education
99 citations, 0.8%
|
|
Frontiers in Education
93 citations, 0.75%
|
|
Computers and Education
90 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
90 citations, 0.73%
|
|
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
79 citations, 0.64%
|
|
Learning and Individual Differences
71 citations, 0.58%
|
|
European Journal of Psychology of Education
69 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Cogent Education
66 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Educational Studies
66 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Educational Psychology
60 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Computers in Human Behavior
59 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
56 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Contemporary Educational Psychology
55 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Interactive Learning Environments
52 citations, 0.42%
|
|
International Journal of Educational Research
52 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Research in Science and Technological Education
51 citations, 0.41%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
50 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Studies in Higher Education
48 citations, 0.39%
|
|
BMC Medical Education
48 citations, 0.39%
|
|
PLoS ONE
48 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Instructional Science
46 citations, 0.37%
|
|
SAGE Open
44 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Educational Technology Research and Development
44 citations, 0.36%
|
|
School Effectiveness and School Improvement
43 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Innovative Digital Practices and Globalization in Higher Education
43 citations, 0.35%
|
|
British Journal of Educational Psychology
40 citations, 0.32%
|
|
AIP Conference Proceedings
40 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
39 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research
39 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Buildings
39 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Educational Research and Evaluation
38 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Journal of Science Education and Technology
37 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
35 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
34 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Educational Psychology Review
34 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
32 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Thinking Skills and Creativity
32 citations, 0.26%
|
|
British Journal of Educational Technology
30 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Higher Education
30 citations, 0.24%
|
|
International Journal of Management Education
29 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Psychology in the Schools
29 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Cultural Studies of Science Education
29 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of School Psychology
29 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Current Psychology
28 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Educational Research Review
28 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Heliyon
27 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Asia Pacific Education Review
26 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Research Papers in Education
26 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice
25 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Psychological Reports
25 citations, 0.2%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
25 citations, 0.2%
|
|
European Journal of Engineering Education
24 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Australian Educational Researcher
24 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Further and Higher Education
23 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Research in Childhood Education
23 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Science Teacher Education
23 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Education 3-13
23 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education
22 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Active Learning in Higher Education
21 citations, 0.17%
|
|
TechTrends
21 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Teacher Development
21 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability
21 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Zeitschrift fur Erziehungswissenschaft
21 citations, 0.17%
|
|
School Psychology International
20 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Internet and Higher Education
20 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Education Research International
20 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Educational Technology
20 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Improving Schools
20 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
19 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Educational Research
19 citations, 0.15%
|
|
ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education
19 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Zeitschrift fur Padagogische Psychologie
19 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Educational Research
19 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Journal of Educational Management
19 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Educational Change
19 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning
18 citations, 0.15%
|
|
European Educational Research Journal
18 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Computer Assisted Language Learning
17 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
17 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Computing in Higher Education
17 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Education
17 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology
17 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of STEM Education
17 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Educational Computing Research
17 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Inclusive Education
17 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Creative Education
17 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Educational Research Open
17 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Technology, Pedagogy and Education
16 citations, 0.13%
|
|
British Educational Research Journal
16 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
|
|
Springer Nature
3551 citations, 28.82%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
2194 citations, 17.81%
|
|
Elsevier
1411 citations, 11.45%
|
|
SAGE
622 citations, 5.05%
|
|
Wiley
537 citations, 4.36%
|
|
MDPI
507 citations, 4.12%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
340 citations, 2.76%
|
|
IGI Global
331 citations, 2.69%
|
|
Emerald
269 citations, 2.18%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
198 citations, 1.61%
|
|
IOP Publishing
72 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
59 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
54 citations, 0.44%
|
|
AIP Publishing
47 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
45 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
43 citations, 0.35%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
40 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
31 citations, 0.25%
|
|
American Educational Research Association
31 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
30 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
29 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
22 citations, 0.18%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
22 citations, 0.18%
|
|
SciELO
22 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Oxford University Press
21 citations, 0.17%
|
|
American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB)
20 citations, 0.16%
|
|
EDP Sciences
18 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Verlag Hans Huber AG
18 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Modestum Ltd
17 citations, 0.14%
|
|
IntechOpen
16 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
16 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
15 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
15 citations, 0.12%
|
|
National Association of School Psychologists
15 citations, 0.12%
|
|
The Pennsylvania State University Press
15 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
14 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
13 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Scientific Methodical Center
13 citations, 0.11%
|
|
F1000 Research
12 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Brill
11 citations, 0.09%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
10 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
10 citations, 0.08%
|
|
IOS Press
9 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
8 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
8 citations, 0.06%
|
|
BMJ
8 citations, 0.06%
|
|
AOSIS
8 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
8 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Physiological Society
7 citations, 0.06%
|
|
National Association of Geoscience Teachers, Inc.
7 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Academic Journals
7 citations, 0.06%
|
|
CAIRN
7 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Early Childhood Australia
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Dental Education Association
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Human Kinetics
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Institut National de Recherche Pedagogique
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Association for Learning Technology
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Oxford Brookes University
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
OpenEdition
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Royal Society
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Springer Publishing Company
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Speech Language Hearing Association
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık Eğitim Danışmanlık Hizmetleri Ticaret A.Ş
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Vilnius University Press
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
ASME International
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Japanese Association of Educational Psychology
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Sakarya University Journal of Education
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
AMO Publisher
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
PeerJ
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Delachaux et Niestle
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Grupo Comunicar, Colectivo Andaluz de Educacion en Medios de Comunicacion
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
BOLEMA Departamento de Matematica
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
JMIR Publications
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Macrothink Institute, Inc.
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
State Public Scientific Technological Library SB RAS
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Kamla Raj Enterprises
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Intellect
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
SLACK
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Selcuk University
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
International Journal of Information and Education Technology
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
|
Publishing organizations
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
|
Curtin University
101 publications, 15.78%
|
|
Utrecht University
16 publications, 2.5%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
13 publications, 2.03%
|
|
Eindhoven University of Technology
12 publications, 1.88%
|
|
University of Helsinki
11 publications, 1.72%
|
|
Leiden University
9 publications, 1.41%
|
|
Texas A&M University
9 publications, 1.41%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
8 publications, 1.25%
|
|
University of Groningen
8 publications, 1.25%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
8 publications, 1.25%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
8 publications, 1.25%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
7 publications, 1.09%
|
|
University of Melbourne
7 publications, 1.09%
|
|
Australian Catholic University
7 publications, 1.09%
|
|
Purdue University
7 publications, 1.09%
|
|
University of Waikato
6 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Hong Kong Baptist University
6 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Jyväskylä
5 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Maastricht University
5 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University of Auckland
5 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Monash University
5 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University of Queensland
5 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Edith Cowan University
5 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
5 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
5 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Simon Fraser University
5 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Open University of the Netherlands
5 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University of North Texas
5 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Bar-Ilan University
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Bahrain
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Twente
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Eastern Finland
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Antwerp
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Yale University
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
La Trobe University
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Tasmania
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Education University of Hong Kong
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
George Mason University
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Arizona
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of British Columbia
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Delaware
4 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Weizmann Institute of Science
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Haifa
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of New South Wales
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Massey University
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Adelaide
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Murdoch University
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
State University of Jakarta
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Western Washington University
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
North Carolina State University
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Illinois State University
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Central Florida
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Bradley University
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Michigan
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
McGill University
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Baylor University
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Bucknell University
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Victoria
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Toronto
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Alberta
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Kentucky
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Middle East Technical University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Isfahan
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
National University of Malaysia
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Lisbon
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Tel Hai Academic College
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Shamir Medical Center
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Al-Qasemi Academic College of Education
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
David Yellin College of Education
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Oulu
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Turku
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University College London
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Dundee
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
UiT The Arctic University of Norway
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
King's College London
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
National University of Singapore
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Michigan State University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
National Tsing Hua University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
National Kaohsiung Normal University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Deakin University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Griffith University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Flinders University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Charles Darwin University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Cape Town
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Columbia University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Gadjah Mada University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Washington State University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
|
|
Curtin University
21 publications, 10.71%
|
|
Texas A&M University
6 publications, 3.06%
|
|
University of Waikato
5 publications, 2.55%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
5 publications, 2.55%
|
|
Eindhoven University of Technology
4 publications, 2.04%
|
|
University of North Texas
4 publications, 2.04%
|
|
University of Helsinki
3 publications, 1.53%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
3 publications, 1.53%
|
|
University of Eastern Finland
3 publications, 1.53%
|
|
Autonomous University of Barcelona
3 publications, 1.53%
|
|
Western Washington University
3 publications, 1.53%
|
|
University of Central Florida
3 publications, 1.53%
|
|
Utrecht University
3 publications, 1.53%
|
|
University of Groningen
3 publications, 1.53%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
3 publications, 1.53%
|
|
Baylor University
3 publications, 1.53%
|
|
Bar-Ilan University
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Bahrain
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Lisbon
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Haifa
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Tel Hai Academic College
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Shamir Medical Center
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
King's College London
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
National University of Singapore
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Yale University
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Melbourne
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Charles Darwin University
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Gadjah Mada University
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
State University of Jakarta
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Hong Kong Baptist University
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Education University of Hong Kong
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Ohio State University
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Kwantlen Polytechnic University
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of British Columbia
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Purdue University in Indianapolis
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Purdue University
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University for Continuing Education Krems
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Open University of Catalonia
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
National University of Mongolia
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Open University of the Netherlands
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Barcelona
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Alberta
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Rovira i Virgili
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Texas Tech University
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Tarleton State University
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Utah
2 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Firat University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Ataturk University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Akdeniz University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Duzce University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Gaziantep University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Istanbul Medeniyet University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
University of Isfahan
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Mersin University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Ho Chi Minh City University of Education
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Tra Vinh University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Zhejiang University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Open University of Israel
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Manipal University Jaipur
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Giresun University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Ahi Evran University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
University of Twente
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
David Yellin College of Education
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
University of New South Wales
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
University of Dundee
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Shanghai Maritime University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
University of Jyväskylä
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Aarhus University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
UiT The Arctic University of Norway
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Maastricht University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Manchester Metropolitan University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Florida State University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Michigan State University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
University of Sydney
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
University of Stavanger
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
University of Agder
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Xi'an International Studies University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
University of Parma
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
University of Trieste
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Massey University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
University of Queensland
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
University of Adelaide
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Macquarie University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Edith Cowan University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Murdoch University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Australian Defence Force Academy
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Columbia University
1 publication, 0.51%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
|
Publishing countries
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
|
|
USA
|
USA, 187, 29.22%
USA
187 publications, 29.22%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 149, 23.28%
Australia
149 publications, 23.28%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 67, 10.47%
Netherlands
67 publications, 10.47%
|
China
|
China, 36, 5.63%
China
36 publications, 5.63%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 30, 4.69%
Israel
30 publications, 4.69%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 27, 4.22%
Canada
27 publications, 4.22%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 23, 3.59%
Finland
23 publications, 3.59%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 22, 3.44%
Germany
22 publications, 3.44%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 21, 3.28%
Belgium
21 publications, 3.28%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 17, 2.66%
United Kingdom
17 publications, 2.66%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 16, 2.5%
Turkey
16 publications, 2.5%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 14, 2.19%
New Zealand
14 publications, 2.19%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 13, 2.03%
Spain
13 publications, 2.03%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 13, 2.03%
Singapore
13 publications, 2.03%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 7, 1.09%
Iran
7 publications, 1.09%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 6, 0.94%
Brazil
6 publications, 0.94%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 6, 0.94%
Indonesia
6 publications, 0.94%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 5, 0.78%
Portugal
5 publications, 0.78%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 5, 0.78%
Bahrain
5 publications, 0.78%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 5, 0.78%
Greece
5 publications, 0.78%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 5, 0.78%
Sweden
5 publications, 0.78%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 5, 0.78%
South Africa
5 publications, 0.78%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 4, 0.63%
Norway
4 publications, 0.63%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 4, 0.63%
UAE
4 publications, 0.63%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 3, 0.47%
Brunei
3 publications, 0.47%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 3, 0.47%
Chile
3 publications, 0.47%
|
France
|
France, 2, 0.31%
France
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 2, 0.31%
Estonia
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 0.31%
Austria
2 publications, 0.31%
|
India
|
India, 2, 0.31%
India
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 0.31%
Ireland
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 2, 0.31%
Italy
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 2, 0.31%
Qatar
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 2, 0.31%
Colombia
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 2, 0.31%
Malaysia
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 2, 0.31%
Mongolia
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 2, 0.31%
Japan
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.16%
Argentina
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.16%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.16%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.16%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.16%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Myanmar
|
Myanmar, 1, 0.16%
Myanmar
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.16%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Palestine
|
Palestine, 1, 0.16%
Palestine
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.16%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.16%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 1, 0.16%
Uganda
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.16%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.16%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.16%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 1, 0.16%
Switzerland
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.16%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Show all (23 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
USA
|
USA, 54, 27.55%
USA
54 publications, 27.55%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 30, 15.31%
Australia
30 publications, 15.31%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 19, 9.69%
Netherlands
19 publications, 9.69%
|
China
|
China, 11, 5.61%
China
11 publications, 5.61%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 10, 5.1%
Israel
10 publications, 5.1%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 9, 4.59%
Germany
9 publications, 4.59%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 9, 4.59%
Canada
9 publications, 4.59%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 9, 4.59%
Turkey
9 publications, 4.59%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 8, 4.08%
Spain
8 publications, 4.08%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 6, 3.06%
United Kingdom
6 publications, 3.06%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 6, 3.06%
New Zealand
6 publications, 3.06%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 6, 3.06%
Finland
6 publications, 3.06%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 4, 2.04%
Portugal
4 publications, 2.04%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 4, 2.04%
Brazil
4 publications, 2.04%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 4, 2.04%
Indonesia
4 publications, 2.04%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 3, 1.53%
Iran
3 publications, 1.53%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 3, 1.53%
Singapore
3 publications, 1.53%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 1.02%
Austria
2 publications, 1.02%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 2, 1.02%
Bahrain
2 publications, 1.02%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 2, 1.02%
Greece
2 publications, 1.02%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 1.02%
Ireland
2 publications, 1.02%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 2, 1.02%
Italy
2 publications, 1.02%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 2, 1.02%
Mongolia
2 publications, 1.02%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 2, 1.02%
Norway
2 publications, 1.02%
|
France
|
France, 1, 0.51%
France
1 publication, 0.51%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.51%
Estonia
1 publication, 0.51%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.51%
Argentina
1 publication, 0.51%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.51%
Belgium
1 publication, 0.51%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 1, 0.51%
Brunei
1 publication, 0.51%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.51%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.51%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.51%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.51%
|
India
|
India, 1, 0.51%
India
1 publication, 0.51%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.51%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.51%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.51%
UAE
1 publication, 0.51%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.51%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.51%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.51%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.51%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.51%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.51%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.51%
Chile
1 publication, 0.51%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.51%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.51%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.51%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.51%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 1, 0.51%
Japan
1 publication, 0.51%
|
Show all (11 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
1 profile journal article
Carter Hannah
16 publications,
33 citations
h-index: 3