SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
4
SJR
0.826
CiteScore
7.7
Categories
Engineering (miscellaneous)
Software
Areas
Computer Science
Engineering
Years of issue
1980-1986, 1992-2025
journal names
Advances in Engineering Software
ADV ENG SOFTW
Top-3 citing journals
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cae9a/cae9a599c9c13910fe3c5136a0c14729d0ea01ca" alt="Advances in Engineering Software"
Advances in Engineering Software
(2321 citations)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52da6/52da6232546c35fd57d742c7d2bd832b1d6faa9e" alt="IEEE Access"
IEEE Access
(1938 citations)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cae9a/cae9a599c9c13910fe3c5136a0c14729d0ea01ca" alt="Expert Systems with Applications"
Expert Systems with Applications
(1375 citations)
Top-3 organizations
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21845/21845eb87632b40e26eeaa24816e8bf039544259" alt="Nanyang Technological University"
Nanyang Technological University
(44 publications)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d522/1d522fae9992d434d450e39ae22ab2bf0d1d450c" alt="Hunan University"
Hunan University
(34 publications)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2118/a2118a122680baa368052dd58efcb5d5ee52034e" alt="National Technical University of Athens"
National Technical University of Athens
(34 publications)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30b74/30b74ba9fd703d84d488567b047f7f6c3401fde1" alt="Al Mustaqbal University College"
Al Mustaqbal University College
(13 publications)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d522/1d522fae9992d434d450e39ae22ab2bf0d1d450c" alt="Hunan University"
Hunan University
(13 publications)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d3d2/1d3d2c5b3b5b0a3786b8696e82afd0962101bcb7" alt="King Khalid University"
King Khalid University
(10 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 1567
Q3
Keyword Generation for Russian-Language Scientific Texts Using the mT5 Model
Glazkova A.V., Morozov D.A., Vorobeva M.S., Stupnikov A.A.
The authors propose an approach to generate keywords for Russian-language scientific texts using the mT5 (multilingual text-to-text transformer) model, fine-tuned on the Keyphrases CS&Math Russian text corpus. Automatic keyword selection is an urgent task in natural language processing, since keywords help readers search for articles and facilitate the systematization of scientific texts. In this paper, the task of selecting keywords is considered as a task of automatic text abstracting. Additional training of mT5 is carried out on the texts of abstracts of Russian-language scientific articles. The input and output data are abstracts and comma-separated lists of keywords, respectively. The results obtained using mT5 are compared with the results of several basic methods: TopicRank, YAKE!, RuTermExtract, and KeyBERT. The following metrics are used to present the results: F‑measure, ROUGE-1, and BERTScore. The best results on the test sample are obtained using mT5 and RuTermExtract. The highest F-measure is demonstrated by the mT5 model (11.24%), surpassing RuTermExtract by 0.22%. RuTermExtract shows the best result according to the ROUGE-1 metric (15.12%). The best results for BERTScore are also achieved by these two methods: mT5, 76.89% (BERTScore using the mBERT model); RuTermExtract, 75.8% (BERTScore based on ruSciBERT). The authors also assess the ability of mT5 to generate keywords that are not in the source text. The limitations of the proposed approach include the need to form a training sample for additional model training and probably the limited applicability of the additional trained model for texts in other subject areas. The advantages of keyword generation using mT5 are the absence of the need to set fixed values for the length and number of keywords, the need for normalization, which is especially important for inflected languages, and the ability to generate keywords that are not explicitly present in the text.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4755f/4755f2b21aa4995a5dcda896864c7bce4407d748" alt="Pleiades Publishing"
Algorithms for Asymptotic and Numerical Modeling of Oscillatory Modes in the Simplest Ring of Generators with Asymmetric Nonlinearity
Glyzin S.D., Marushkina E.A.
A system of three ring-coupled generators with asymmetric nonlinearity and special nonlinear coupling is considered. The investigated system simulates an electrical circuit of three identical generators. Each generator is an oscillatory circuit with a nonlinear element. The current–voltage characteristic of this element has the S-shape. The nonlinear coupling between the generators is organized in such a way that it has a transmission coefficient close to one in the forward direction and close to zero in the reverse direction. First, the problem of finding the solutions that bifurcate from equilibrium states is investigated by asymptotic methods. Then, the original system is studied by numerical methods. The dependence of the dynamics of the system on the degree of asymmetry of cubic nonlinearity, which describes the characteristic of the nonlinear element, is analyzed.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4755f/4755f2b21aa4995a5dcda896864c7bce4407d748" alt="Pleiades Publishing"
Application of Deep Neural Networks for Automatic Irony Detection in Russian-Language Texts
Kosterin M.A., Paramonov I.V.
This paper examines automatic methods for classifying Russian-language sentences into two classes: ironic and nonironic. The methods under consideration can be divided into three categories: classifiers based on language model embeddings, classifiers based on sentiment information, and classifiers that train embeddings to detect irony. The components of classifiers are neural networks such as BERT, RoBERTa, BiLSTM, and CNN, as well as an attention mechanism and fully connected layers. Experiments to detect irony are carried out using two corpora of Russian-language sentences: the first corpus is composed of journalistic texts from OpenCorpora, while the second corpus is an extension of the first one and is supplemented with ironic sentences from Wiktionary. The best results are demonstrated by a group of classifiers based on pure embeddings of language models with the maximum F-measure value of 0.84, achieved by a combination of RoBERTa, BiLSTM, an attention mechanism, and a pair of fully connected layers in experiments on an extended corpus. In general, using the extended corpus produces results that are 2–5% better than those using the basic corpus. The achieved results are the best for the problem under consideration for the Russian language and are comparable to the best ones for English.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4755f/4755f2b21aa4995a5dcda896864c7bce4407d748" alt="Pleiades Publishing"
On the Application of the Calculus of Positively Constructed Formulas for the Study of Controlled Discrete-Event Systems
Davydov A.V., Larionov A.A., Nagul N.V.
The article is devoted to the development of an approach to solving the main problems of the theory of supervisory control of logical discrete-event systems (DES), based on their representation in the form of positively constructed formulas (PCF). We consider logical DESs in automata form, understood as generators of some regular languages. The PCF language is a complete first-order language, the formulas of which have a regular structure of alternating type quantifiers and do not contain a negation operator in the syntax. It was previously proven that any formula of the classical first-order predicate calculus can be represented as a PCF. PCFs have a visual tree representation and a natural question-and-answer procedure for searching for an inference using a single inference rule. It is shown how the PCF calculus, developed in the 1990s to solve some problems of control of dynamic systems, makes it possible to solve basic problems of the theory of supervisory control, such as checking the criteria for the existence of supervisory control, automatically modifying restrictions on the behavior of the controlled system, and implementing a supervisor. Due to some features of the PCF calculus, it is possible to use a non-monotonic inference. It is demonstrated how the presented PCF-based method allows for additional event processing during inference. The Bootfrost software system, or the so-called prover, designed to refute the obtained PCFs is also presented, and the features of its implementation are briefly described. As an illustrative example, we consider the problem of controlling an autonomous mobile robot.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4755f/4755f2b21aa4995a5dcda896864c7bce4407d748" alt="Pleiades Publishing"
Tasks in Named Entity Recognition: Technologies and Tools
Lagutina N.S., Vasilyev A.M., Zafievsky D.D.
The task of named entity recognition (NER) is to identify and classify words and phrases denoting named entities (NEs), such as people, organizations, geographical names, dates, events, and terms from subject areas. While searching for the best solution, researchers conduct a wide range of experiments with different technologies and input data. A comparison of the results of these experiments shows a significant discrepancy in the quality of NER and poses the problem of determining the conditions and limitations for the application of the used technologies, as well as finding new solutions. An important part in answering these questions is the systematization and analysis of current research and the publication of relevant reviews. In the field of NE recognition, the authors of analytical articles primarily consider mathematical methods of identification and classification and do not pay attention to the specifics of the problem itself. In this survey, the field of NE recognition is considered from the point of view of individual task categories. The authors identify five categories: the classical task of NER, NER subtasks, NER in social media, NER in domain, and NER in natural language processing (NLP) tasks. For each category the authors discuss the quality of the solution, features of the methods, problems, and limitations. Information about current scientific works of each category is given in the form of a table for clarity. This review allows us to draw a number of conclusions. Deep learning methods are the leading methods among state-of-the-art technologies. The main problems are the lack of datasets in open access, strict requirements for computing resources, and the lack of error analysis. A promising area of research in NER is the development of methods based on unsupervised techniques or rule-based learning. Intensively developing language models in existing NLP tools can serve as a possible basis for text preprocessing for NER methods. The article ends with a description and results of experiments with NER tools for Russian-language texts.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4755f/4755f2b21aa4995a5dcda896864c7bce4407d748" alt="Pleiades Publishing"
Study of a Radar Sensor Transmitter to Optimize a Bipolar Ultrawideband Pulse Used to Excite the Antenna
Aristov V., Greitans M.
The desire to increase the energy of the pulses by which the impact excitation of ultrawideband antennas is carried out prompts some authors of equipment (radars) to change the shape of these pulses. In particular, pulses are made bipolar. This article explores the issue of optimizing the shift of the second component of the excitation pulse. Such a shift allows obtaining the maximum level of the spectrum at the frequency of interest, determined by the transmitter-receiver path.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4755f/4755f2b21aa4995a5dcda896864c7bce4407d748" alt="Pleiades Publishing"
GMM Based Fault Signature Estimation of Electromechanical Machines for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in IoT Environment
Verasis Kour, Parveen Kumar Lehana
Small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) form backbone of a nation’s economy. Implementation of technologies like Internet of Things (IoT), however, is a challenge for majority of them as the conventional solution requires a lot of investment. Thus, financially restricted SMEs, especially in developing nations, remain aloof from leveraging the benefits of the technology. Resorting to affordable devices such as low-cost sensors, actuators, processors, servers, and network technologies etc., pose challenges like low memory, low computation power, less transmission power, low data transfer rate, and limited network bandwidth. Consequently, there arises a need to develop IoT based solutions that cater to these challenges so that low budget SMEs are also able to benefit from IoT’s umpteen advantages. This paper proposes an affordable IoT based framework for health status monitoring of machines in SMEs keeping the limitations imposed by low cost IoT devices as centre of the solution. The scope of the present research is limited to monitoring the health status of the electromechanical rotating machines only. Four types of commonly occurring faults in the machines at different rotating speeds are investigated using acoustic signals generated within the machines. Mahalanobis distance and Gaussian mixture model (GMM) have been employed for the analysis of the acoustic signals for estimating the unique fault dependent signatures. GMM works satisfactorily with smaller datasets and requires lesser amount of computational power in comparison to machine learning based algorithms. The investigations have showed that GMM may be effectively used in resource constrained SMEs deploying affordable IoT devices for predictive maintenance.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4755f/4755f2b21aa4995a5dcda896864c7bce4407d748" alt="Pleiades Publishing"
Erratum to: Cluster Based QOS-Routing Protocol for VANET in Highway Environment
Fatima Belamri, Boulfekhar S., Aissani D.
An Erratum to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0146411624060014
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4755f/4755f2b21aa4995a5dcda896864c7bce4407d748" alt="Pleiades Publishing"
Altitude-Based Dynamics Modulation and Power Analysis in LEO Satellites
Shahid Ali, Bingli Jiao
Efficient signal modulation schemes are crucial for optimizing communication performance in low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite systems. Traditionally, uniform modulation methods are applied across the satellite constellation, regardless of variations in satellite distances from ground stations. However, this approach leads to inefficient signal power utilization, particularly for satellites at higher altitudes. This paper proposes a novel solution to this issue by implementing dynamic modulation strategies tailored to specific altitude ranges of LEO satellites. Through dynamic modulation, we utilize binary phase-shift keying (BPSK) and quadrature phase-shift keying (QPSK) for satellites positioned farther from earth, while higher-order constellations are used for satellites in closer proximity. This altitude-dependent modulation scheme aims to improve power efficiency throughout the LEO satellite network. Our results demonstrate a significant enhancement in power efficiency across the LEO satellite system compared to the conventional uniform modulation scheme. The adaptability of this dynamic modulation approach to satellite altitude variations allows for more judicious utilization of signal power, thereby maximizing communication quality and network reliability. We validate the effectiveness of the proposed method through extensive simulations.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4755f/4755f2b21aa4995a5dcda896864c7bce4407d748" alt="Pleiades Publishing"
Water Quality Assessment for Fishpond via Multisource Information Fusion
Yang Hanhua, Chong Chen
Data fusion can effectively process multisource information so as to obtain more accurate and reliable results. The data of water quality in a fishpond comes from various sensors, therefore the data must be fused. In this study, K-nearest interpolation, Grubbs criterion, a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, as well as an improved fruit fly optimization algorithm (IFOA) to find optimal parameters γ and σ of least squares support vector regression (LSSVR), were combined to provide accurate data for multisource information fusion modeling. The K-nearest interpolation method and grubbs criterion were employed to process abnormal data gross errors. Besides, a batch estimation adaptive weighted fusion algorithm was employed to, respectively, integrate the data from dissolved oxygen, water temperature, PH, and ammonia nitrogen concentration. A fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, as well as analytic hierarchy process (AHP) were employed to obtain the true value of water quality grade. In addition, an IFOA-LSSVR model was proposed to predict the future water quality, which can better fit the nonlinear relationship between complex environmental factors and water quality. Experimental results show that the presented method can improve the data accuracy and provide decision results and scientific basis for the precision control of water quality environment.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4755f/4755f2b21aa4995a5dcda896864c7bce4407d748" alt="Pleiades Publishing"
Joint Simplification of Various Types of Spatial Objects While Preserving Topological Relations
Yakimova O.P., Murin D.M., Gorshkov V.G.
Cartographic generalization includes the selection of objects and phenomena, as well as their simplification (generalization), to be shown in the map while preserving the main typical traits, characteristics, and correlations by the criteria set by the user in the request. These criteria include the problem being solved and the scale of the displayed map. Various map transformations can change the relationships between objects, especially since it is common practice to simplify each type of spatial object independently (first the administrative boundaries, then the road network, populated localities, hydrographic network, etc.). The solution of topological conflicts is one of the key problems of generalizing digital map. A great deal of attention has been paid to the solution of this problem since the start of studies in this domain. The consideration of coverings and mesh structures confines the more general problem of managing topological conflicts to solve topological conflicts within a mesh cell. This study proposes a new geometric simplification algorithm. Its feature consists of the joint simplification of a set of spatial objects of various types while preserving their topological relations. The only parameter of the proposed algorithm is the minimal size of the detail shown in the map. Usually, this size is equal to one millimeter in the target map scale. Step one of the algorithm is the construction of a special mesh data structure. This structure is used to form, for each spatial object, a sequence of cells, to which points of this object belong. If a cell contains points of only one object, the object is geometrically simplified within the bounding cell using the sleeve-fitting algorithm. If a cell contains points of several objects, the geometric simplification is done using a special topology-preserving procedure.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4755f/4755f2b21aa4995a5dcda896864c7bce4407d748" alt="Pleiades Publishing"
Minimal Covering of Generalized Typed Inclusion Dependencies in Databases
Zykin S.V.
The theory and algorithms required to construct the minimal covering of generalized typed inclusion dependencies are discussed. Traditionally, the construction of the minimal covering is used for all types of dependencies in order to obtain a nonredundant and consistent database design. Generalized inclusion dependencies correspond to referential integrity constraints, when several main relations and several external relations are involved in one constraint, which corresponds to an ultragraph edge. A system of axioms with proof of consistency and completeness based on the study of dependency properties is presented in the previous study. In this study, closures for generalized typed inclusion dependencies are studied. An algorithm for constructing closures is developed. The correctness of the algorithm is proved. The results are further used to develop an algorithm for constructing the minimum covering. Examples that demonstrate the operation of the algorithms are presented at the end of the article.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4755f/4755f2b21aa4995a5dcda896864c7bce4407d748" alt="Pleiades Publishing"
On a Geometric Approach to the Estimation of Interpolation Projectors
Nevskii M.V., Ukhalov A.Y.
Suppose $$\Omega $$ is a closed bounded subset of $${{\mathbb{R}}^{n}},$$ $$S$$ is an $$n$$ -dimensional nondegenerate simplex, $$\xi (\Omega ;S): = \min \left\{ {\sigma \geqslant 1:\Omega \subset \sigma S} \right\}$$ . Here $$\sigma S$$ is the result of homothety of $$S$$ with respect to the center of gravity with coefficient $$\sigma $$ . Let $$d \geqslant n + 1,$$ $${{\varphi }_{1}}(x), \ldots ,{{\varphi }_{d}}(x)$$ be linearly independent monomials in $$n$$ variables, $${{\varphi }_{1}}(x) \equiv 1,$$ $${{\varphi }_{2}}(x) = {{x}_{1}}, \ldots ,\;{{\varphi }_{{n + 1}}}(x) = {{x}_{n}}.$$ Put $$\Pi : = {\text{lin}}({{\varphi }_{1}}, \ldots ,{{\varphi }_{d}}).$$ The interpolation projector $$P:C(\Omega ) \to \Pi $$ with a set of nodes $${{x}^{{(1)}}}, \ldots ,{{x}^{{(d)}}}$$ $$ \in \Omega $$ is defined by the equalities $$Pf\left( {{{x}^{{(j)}}}} \right) = f\left( {{{x}^{{(j)}}}} \right).$$ Denote by $${{\left\| P \right\|}_{\Omega }}$$ the norm of $$P$$ as an operator from $$C(\Omega )$$ to $$C(\Omega )$$ . Consider the mapping $$T:{{\mathbb{R}}^{n}} \to {{\mathbb{R}}^{{d - 1}}}$$ of the form $$T(x): = ({{\varphi }_{2}}(x), \ldots ,{{\varphi }_{d}}(x)).$$ We have the following inequalities: $$\frac{1}{2}\left( {1 + \frac{1}{{d - 1}}} \right)\left( {{{{\left\| P \right\|}}_{\Omega }} - 1} \right) + 1$$ $$ \leqslant \xi (T(\Omega );S) \leqslant \frac{d}{2}\left( {{{{\left\| P \right\|}}_{\Omega }} - 1} \right) + 1.$$ Here $$S$$ is the $$(d - 1)$$ -dimensional simplex with vertices $$T({{x}^{{(j)}}}).$$ We discuss this and other relations for polynomial interpolation of functions continuous on a segment. The results of numerical analysis are presented.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4755f/4755f2b21aa4995a5dcda896864c7bce4407d748" alt="Pleiades Publishing"
A Security Scheme for Source-Location Privacy Protection in Wireless Sensor Networks by Selecting Phantom Nodes
Xiaoguang Wei, Qian Zhang
Source-location privacy (SLP) is an important concern in wireless sensor networks (WSNs) as it can threaten WSN security. This paper first analyzed the SLP problem and then designed a node energy and distance-based SLP (NEDSLP) scheme from the point of selecting phantom nodes. The selection of phantom nodes occurred beyond the visible range of the source node, and the next hop routing was selected by considering both node energy and distance. This paper first briefly analyzed the SLP problem and then designed a node energy and distance-based SLP (NEDSLP) security scheme from the selection of phantom nodes, which selected phantom nodes outside the visual zone of the source node and selected the next hop routes by considering the node energy and distance together. Simulations on OMNet++ found that, compared with a protocol using source-based restricted flooding (PUSBRF) and a source location privacy protection scheme based on ring-loop routing (SLPRR), the NEDSLP scheme had a safety time of 886 when the number of hops was 50, which was 23% higher than the SLPRR. The energy consumption of the NEDSLP scheme was 72 hops, which was slightly higher than the PUSBRF but slightly lower than the SLPRR. The transmission delay was 46 hops, reduced by 25% compared to the PUSBRF and reduced by 18% compared to the SLPRR. The results demonstrate that the scheme proposed in this paper can effectively improve the security of SLPs for the purpose of protecting monitoring targets and can be further applied in WSNs.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4755f/4755f2b21aa4995a5dcda896864c7bce4407d748" alt="Pleiades Publishing"
Recursive-Parallel Algorithm for Solving the Maximum Common Subgraph Problem
Vasilchikov V.V.
In this paper, we propose an algorithm for solving the maximum common subgraph problem. The sequential and parallel versions of the algorithm and their software implementation are described, and their effectiveness is experimentally studied. This problem is one of the most famous NP-complete problems. Its solution may be required when solving many practical problems related to the study of complex structures. We solve it in a formulation in which we need to find all possible isomorphisms of the found common subgraph. Due to the extremely high complexity of the problem, the desire to speed up its solution by parallelizing the algorithm is quite natural. To organize parallel computing, the RPM_ParLib library is used, which makes it possible to create parallel applications running on a local computer network under the control of the .NET Framework runtime environment. The library supports a recursive-parallel programming style and ensures efficient distribution of work and dynamic load balancing of computing modules during program execution. It can be used for applications written in any programming language supported by the .NET Framework. The purpose of the numerical experiment is to study the acceleration achieved through the recursive-parallel organization of calculations. For the experiment, a special application in C# that is designed to generate various sets of initial data with specified parameters is developed. Here, we describe the characteristics of the generated initial graph pairs and the results obtained during the experiment.
Top-100
Citing journals
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
|
Advances in Engineering Software
2321 citations, 2.36%
|
|
IEEE Access
1938 citations, 1.97%
|
|
Expert Systems with Applications
1375 citations, 1.4%
|
|
Applied Soft Computing Journal
1335 citations, 1.36%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
1088 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Neural Computing and Applications
1071 citations, 1.09%
|
|
Soft Computing
874 citations, 0.89%
|
|
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
825 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
796 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
794 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Mathematics
794 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Engineering Structures
768 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Scientific Reports
703 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Computers and Structures
690 citations, 0.7%
|
|
Engineering with Computers
671 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Knowledge-Based Systems
596 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
583 citations, 0.59%
|
|
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
568 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Energies
544 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Construction and Building Materials
540 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Structures
534 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements
532 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Composite Structures
511 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Sensors
459 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Multimedia Tools and Applications
434 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Applied Intelligence
417 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Artificial Intelligence Review
402 citations, 0.41%
|
|
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
390 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Sustainability
389 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
360 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Energy
357 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Automation in Construction
330 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Materials
330 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
317 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering
311 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Thin-Walled Structures
303 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Evolutionary Intelligence
301 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Applied Mathematical Modelling
300 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
297 citations, 0.3%
|
|
International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
296 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering
293 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Supercomputing
292 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Engineering Computations
291 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Electronics (Switzerland)
285 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Buildings
284 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Ocean Engineering
274 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Biomimetics
270 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Finite Elements in Analysis and Design
268 citations, 0.27%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
258 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
255 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Studies in Computational Intelligence
252 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Engineering Optimization
241 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering
226 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Building Engineering
221 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering
216 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Cluster Computing
216 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
206 citations, 0.21%
|
|
AIP Conference Proceedings
202 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Water (Switzerland)
199 citations, 0.2%
|
|
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering
197 citations, 0.2%
|
|
International Journal of Solids and Structures
192 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems
191 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
190 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Advanced Materials Research
184 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Advanced Engineering Informatics
182 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Applied Mechanics and Materials
181 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering
177 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation
173 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Sound and Vibration
171 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science
169 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Computers and Industrial Engineering
166 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Structural Engineering and Mechanics
158 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Computers and Geotechnics
153 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology - Transactions of Civil Engineering
153 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
150 citations, 0.15%
|
|
CAD Computer Aided Design
149 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Constructional Steel Research
148 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Symmetry
145 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Computers and Mathematics with Applications
143 citations, 0.15%
|
|
PLoS ONE
143 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering
141 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Production Research
140 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Engineering Failure Analysis
139 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Advances in Civil Engineering
138 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
138 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
137 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Computational Mechanics
135 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Communications in Computer and Information Science
133 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Computers in Biology and Medicine
133 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Procedia Engineering
132 citations, 0.13%
|
|
SAE Technical Papers
129 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics
128 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Hydrology
128 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering
126 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Advances in Mechanical Engineering
126 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology
124 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Water Resources Management
123 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Materials Today: Proceedings
121 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures
116 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Composites Part B: Engineering
113 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
Citing publishers
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
|
|
Elsevier
31431 citations, 31.92%
|
|
Springer Nature
21131 citations, 21.46%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
9238 citations, 9.38%
|
|
MDPI
7559 citations, 7.68%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
3827 citations, 3.89%
|
|
Wiley
3243 citations, 3.29%
|
|
SAGE
2039 citations, 2.07%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
1726 citations, 1.75%
|
|
IOP Publishing
1138 citations, 1.16%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
1098 citations, 1.12%
|
|
Emerald
1059 citations, 1.08%
|
|
World Scientific
669 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
611 citations, 0.62%
|
|
IGI Global
565 citations, 0.57%
|
|
AIP Publishing
558 citations, 0.57%
|
|
ASME International
485 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
484 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
458 citations, 0.47%
|
|
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
403 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
388 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
379 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Oxford University Press
337 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
281 citations, 0.29%
|
|
EDP Sciences
270 citations, 0.27%
|
|
IOS Press
259 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Tech Science Press
255 citations, 0.26%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
236 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Techno-Press
191 citations, 0.19%
|
|
IWA Publishing
180 citations, 0.18%
|
|
SAE International
172 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Alexandria University
153 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers
129 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
121 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
118 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Thomas Telford
117 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Instrument Society of America
113 citations, 0.11%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
105 citations, 0.11%
|
|
King Saud University
95 citations, 0.1%
|
|
92 citations, 0.09%
|
|
82 citations, 0.08%
|
|
PeerJ
79 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
74 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
68 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Argentinean Association of Computational Mechanics
66 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)
62 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Ain Shams University
57 citations, 0.06%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
55 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Copernicus
51 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
49 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
47 citations, 0.05%
|
|
The Royal Society
45 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Korean Society of Steel Construction
45 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
45 citations, 0.05%
|
|
SciELO
43 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Korea Soc of Automotive Engineers, Inc
40 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Science Alert
40 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IntechOpen
40 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Society of Petroleum Engineers
39 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
35 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
35 citations, 0.04%
|
|
34 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
31 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Korean Society of Precision Engineering
31 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
30 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Zhejiang University Press
29 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Hans Publishers
29 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Sharif University of Technology
25 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Begell House
23 citations, 0.02%
|
|
ASTM International
21 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Tsinghua University Press
19 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
19 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering
19 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
18 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Chinese Academy of Sciences
18 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
17 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
16 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mathematical Sciences Publishers
16 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japan Society of Civil Engineers
16 citations, 0.02%
|
|
F1000 Research
15 citations, 0.02%
|
|
International Research and Training Centre on Erosion and Sedimentation
14 citations, 0.01%
|
|
China Science Publishing & Media
14 citations, 0.01%
|
|
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
13 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Fuji Technology Press
12 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
12 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Universidade Federal de São Carlos
12 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Iron and Steel Institute of Japan
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Shanghai Jiaotong University Press
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Science in China Press
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Multi-Science Publishing Co Ltd.
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Japan Concrete Institute
11 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
MIT Press
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Japanese Geotechnical Society
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Geophysical Union
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
JVE International Ltd.
10 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
44 publications, 1.23%
|
|
Hunan University
34 publications, 0.95%
|
|
National Technical University of Athens
34 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Zhejiang University
28 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University of A Coruña
28 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
25 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
24 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Valencia
24 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Iran University of Science and Technology
23 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Northwestern Polytechnical University
23 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Seoul National University
22 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
22 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Old Dominion University
22 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
21 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
21 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
20 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Pecs
19 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Tsinghua University
18 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Hohai University
18 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Xi'an University of Technology
18 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Heriot-Watt University
18 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Istanbul Technical University
17 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Sejong University
17 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Technical University of Ostrava
17 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Beihang University
16 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Liverpool
16 publications, 0.45%
|
|
National University of Singapore
16 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Maribor
16 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Erciyes University
15 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Cukurova University
15 publications, 0.42%
|
|
California Institute of Technology
15 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Technical University of Crete
15 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Tehran
14 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
14 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Harbin Institute of Technology
14 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
14 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Central South University
14 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Coimbra
14 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Ljubljana
14 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Firat University
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Al Mustaqbal University College
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Tongji University
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Lisbon
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Cardiff University
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Leeds
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
13 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
12 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Jilin University
12 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Ghent University
12 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Wuhan University of Technology
12 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Nottingham
12 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Nagoya University
12 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
12 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Leibniz University Hannover
12 publications, 0.34%
|
|
CentraleSupélec
12 publications, 0.34%
|
|
King Khalid University
11 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Amirkabir University of Technology
11 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Kuwait University
11 publications, 0.31%
|
|
National Taiwan Ocean University
11 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Milan
11 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Loughborough University
11 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Patras
11 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Swansea University
11 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Purdue University
11 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
11 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Tokyo
11 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Castilla-La Mancha
11 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Polytechnique Montréal
11 publications, 0.31%
|
|
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
10 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Sharif University of Technology
10 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Aksaray University
10 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Nanjing University of Science and Technology
10 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
10 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
10 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Imperial College London
10 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Iowa State University
10 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Stanford University
10 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
10 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Virginia Tech
10 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Minnesota
10 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Salamanca
10 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
10 publications, 0.28%
|
|
SRM Institute of Science and Technology
9 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Zhejiang University of Technology
9 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Pamukkale University
9 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Nigde Omer Halisdemir University
9 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
9 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Southeast University
9 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Dundee
9 publications, 0.25%
|
|
City, University of London
9 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Manchester
9 publications, 0.25%
|
|
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology
9 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
9 publications, 0.25%
|
|
North Carolina State University
9 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
9 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Cracow University of Technology
9 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Catalonia
9 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
8 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
|
Al Mustaqbal University College
13 publications, 2.02%
|
|
Hunan University
13 publications, 2.02%
|
|
King Khalid University
10 publications, 1.55%
|
|
SRM Institute of Science and Technology
9 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Northwestern Polytechnical University
9 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Central South University
9 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Sejong University
8 publications, 1.24%
|
|
Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University
7 publications, 1.09%
|
|
Ghent University
7 publications, 1.09%
|
|
Zagazig University
7 publications, 1.09%
|
|
Qassim University
6 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation
6 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Duy Tan University
6 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Tongji University
6 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
6 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Vellore Institute of Technology University
5 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University of Babylon
5 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Ho Chi Minh City Open University
5 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology
5 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University of Lisbon
5 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Taiyuan University of Technology
5 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
5 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Leibniz University Hannover
5 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City
4 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Jaypee University of Engineering and Technology
4 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Jilin University
4 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
4 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Istinye University
4 publications, 0.62%
|
|
B.S. Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology
4 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Nanjing University of Science and Technology
4 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Delft University of Technology
4 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Imperial College London
4 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Hohai University
4 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
4 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Xi'an University of Technology
4 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Swinburne University of Technology
4 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Yonsei University
4 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Pecs
4 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Castilla-La Mancha
4 publications, 0.62%
|
|
CentraleSupélec
4 publications, 0.62%
|
|
King Abdulaziz University
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Ege University
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Vietnam Maritime University
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Beijing Institute of Technology
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Harbin Institute of Technology
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
South China University of Technology
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Beihang University
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
GLA University
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Aix-Marseille University
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Shenzhen University
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Liverpool
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Institute of Fundamental Technological Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Monash University
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Changsha University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Luxembourg
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Guangxi University
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Ruhr University Bochum
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Menoufia University
3 publications, 0.47%
|
|
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Majmaah University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Umm al-Qura University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Saudi Electronic University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Iran University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Ajman University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Lahore
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines) Dhanbad
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Anna University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Graphic Era University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Tsinghua University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Zhejiang University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Zhejiang University of Technology
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Peking University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Gandhi Institute of Technology and Management
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
China University of Mining and Technology
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Science, Malaysia
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Technology, Malaysia
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
REVA University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Fuzhou University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Southeast University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Ramaiah Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Hindustan Institute of Technology and Science
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Vels Institute of Science, Technology & Advanced Studies
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Wuhan University of Technology
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Technische Universität Dresden
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
École normale supérieure Paris-Saclay
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Ocean University of China
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Science and Technology Beijing
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Xiamen University
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Milan
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Turin
2 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
|
China
|
China, 608, 17.02%
China
608 publications, 17.02%
|
USA
|
USA, 455, 12.74%
USA
455 publications, 12.74%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 284, 7.95%
United Kingdom
284 publications, 7.95%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 183, 5.12%
Spain
183 publications, 5.12%
|
India
|
India, 181, 5.07%
India
181 publications, 5.07%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 160, 4.48%
Turkey
160 publications, 4.48%
|
France
|
France, 126, 3.53%
France
126 publications, 3.53%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 119, 3.33%
Germany
119 publications, 3.33%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 108, 3.02%
Italy
108 publications, 3.02%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 103, 2.88%
Iran
103 publications, 2.88%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 103, 2.88%
Republic of Korea
103 publications, 2.88%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 99, 2.77%
Czech Republic
99 publications, 2.77%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 87, 2.44%
Greece
87 publications, 2.44%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 84, 2.35%
Canada
84 publications, 2.35%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 83, 2.32%
Brazil
83 publications, 2.32%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 80, 2.24%
Japan
80 publications, 2.24%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 70, 1.96%
Australia
70 publications, 1.96%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 60, 1.68%
Singapore
60 publications, 1.68%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 59, 1.65%
Portugal
59 publications, 1.65%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 50, 1.4%
Poland
50 publications, 1.4%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 41, 1.15%
Saudi Arabia
41 publications, 1.15%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 40, 1.12%
Belgium
40 publications, 1.12%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 36, 1.01%
Hungary
36 publications, 1.01%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 33, 0.92%
Slovenia
33 publications, 0.92%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 32, 0.9%
Vietnam
32 publications, 0.9%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 32, 0.9%
Malaysia
32 publications, 0.9%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 25, 0.7%
Sweden
25 publications, 0.7%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 23, 0.64%
Iraq
23 publications, 0.64%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 21, 0.59%
Austria
21 publications, 0.59%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 20, 0.56%
Serbia
20 publications, 0.56%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 19, 0.53%
Russia
19 publications, 0.53%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 19, 0.53%
Netherlands
19 publications, 0.53%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 19, 0.53%
Switzerland
19 publications, 0.53%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 18, 0.5%
Mexico
18 publications, 0.5%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 17, 0.48%
Argentina
17 publications, 0.48%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 17, 0.48%
Egypt
17 publications, 0.48%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 16, 0.45%
Tunisia
16 publications, 0.45%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 14, 0.39%
Ireland
14 publications, 0.39%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 14, 0.39%
Finland
14 publications, 0.39%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 13, 0.36%
Slovakia
13 publications, 0.36%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 13, 0.36%
Chile
13 publications, 0.36%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 12, 0.34%
Kuwait
12 publications, 0.34%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 11, 0.31%
Lebanon
11 publications, 0.31%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 11, 0.31%
Pakistan
11 publications, 0.31%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 10, 0.28%
Algeria
10 publications, 0.28%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 10, 0.28%
Denmark
10 publications, 0.28%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 10, 0.28%
Jordan
10 publications, 0.28%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 10, 0.28%
Norway
10 publications, 0.28%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 10, 0.28%
South Africa
10 publications, 0.28%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 9, 0.25%
Thailand
9 publications, 0.25%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 8, 0.22%
Estonia
8 publications, 0.22%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 8, 0.22%
Bahrain
8 publications, 0.22%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 7, 0.2%
Oman
7 publications, 0.2%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 6, 0.17%
Bulgaria
6 publications, 0.17%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 6, 0.17%
Venezuela
6 publications, 0.17%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 6, 0.17%
Israel
6 publications, 0.17%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 6, 0.17%
Qatar
6 publications, 0.17%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 6, 0.17%
Lithuania
6 publications, 0.17%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 6, 0.17%
UAE
6 publications, 0.17%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 5, 0.14%
Colombia
5 publications, 0.14%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 5, 0.14%
Luxembourg
5 publications, 0.14%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 5, 0.14%
Romania
5 publications, 0.14%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 4, 0.11%
Ukraine
4 publications, 0.11%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 4, 0.11%
Bangladesh
4 publications, 0.11%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 4, 0.11%
Cyprus
4 publications, 0.11%
|
Yugoslavia
|
Yugoslavia, 4, 0.11%
Yugoslavia
4 publications, 0.11%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 3, 0.08%
Brunei
3 publications, 0.08%
|
Libya
|
Libya, 3, 0.08%
Libya
3 publications, 0.08%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 3, 0.08%
Morocco
3 publications, 0.08%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 3, 0.08%
Nigeria
3 publications, 0.08%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 3, 0.08%
New Zealand
3 publications, 0.08%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 3, 0.08%
Croatia
3 publications, 0.08%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2, 0.06%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 2, 0.06%
Zimbabwe
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 2, 0.06%
Indonesia
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 2, 0.06%
Philippines
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 2, 0.06%
Ecuador
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 2, 0.06%
Ethiopia
2 publications, 0.06%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.03%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 1, 0.03%
Belarus
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Albania
|
Albania, 1, 0.03%
Albania
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 1, 0.03%
Georgia
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 1, 0.03%
Kenya
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Mauritius
|
Mauritius, 1, 0.03%
Mauritius
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Mali
|
Mali, 1, 0.03%
Mali
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Palestine
|
Palestine, 1, 0.03%
Palestine
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Paraguay
|
Paraguay, 1, 0.03%
Paraguay
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Syria
|
Syria, 1, 0.03%
Syria
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Central African Republic
|
Central African Republic, 1, 0.03%
Central African Republic
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Montenegro
|
Montenegro, 1, 0.03%
Montenegro
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.03%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.03%
|
Show all (61 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|
|
China
|
China, 136, 21.12%
China
136 publications, 21.12%
|
India
|
India, 106, 16.46%
India
106 publications, 16.46%
|
USA
|
USA, 36, 5.59%
USA
36 publications, 5.59%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 29, 4.5%
United Kingdom
29 publications, 4.5%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 27, 4.19%
Saudi Arabia
27 publications, 4.19%
|
France
|
France, 22, 3.42%
France
22 publications, 3.42%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 21, 3.26%
Vietnam
21 publications, 3.26%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 21, 3.26%
Republic of Korea
21 publications, 3.26%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 19, 2.95%
Germany
19 publications, 2.95%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 19, 2.95%
Poland
19 publications, 2.95%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 18, 2.8%
Australia
18 publications, 2.8%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 17, 2.64%
Spain
17 publications, 2.64%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 16, 2.48%
Iraq
16 publications, 2.48%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 16, 2.48%
Turkey
16 publications, 2.48%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 11, 1.71%
Portugal
11 publications, 1.71%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 10, 1.55%
Belgium
10 publications, 1.55%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 10, 1.55%
Hungary
10 publications, 1.55%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 10, 1.55%
Egypt
10 publications, 1.55%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 10, 1.55%
Iran
10 publications, 1.55%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 9, 1.4%
Italy
9 publications, 1.4%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 8, 1.24%
Brazil
8 publications, 1.24%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 8, 1.24%
Malaysia
8 publications, 1.24%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 8, 1.24%
Pakistan
8 publications, 1.24%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 7, 1.09%
Czech Republic
7 publications, 1.09%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 6, 0.93%
Netherlands
6 publications, 0.93%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 5, 0.78%
Serbia
5 publications, 0.78%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 4, 0.62%
Canada
4 publications, 0.62%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 4, 0.62%
Luxembourg
4 publications, 0.62%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 4, 0.62%
Sweden
4 publications, 0.62%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 4, 0.62%
Japan
4 publications, 0.62%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 3, 0.47%
Austria
3 publications, 0.47%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 3, 0.47%
Denmark
3 publications, 0.47%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 3, 0.47%
Oman
3 publications, 0.47%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 3, 0.47%
Thailand
3 publications, 0.47%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 3, 0.47%
Switzerland
3 publications, 0.47%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 2, 0.31%
Russia
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 2, 0.31%
Algeria
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 2, 0.31%
Bangladesh
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 2, 0.31%
Brunei
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 2, 0.31%
Greece
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 0.31%
Ireland
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 2, 0.31%
Morocco
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 2, 0.31%
Mexico
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 2, 0.31%
Norway
2 publications, 0.31%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 2, 0.31%
UAE
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.31%
Chile
2 publications, 0.31%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 2, 0.31%
South Africa
2 publications, 0.31%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.16%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.16%
Estonia
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 1, 0.16%
Bahrain
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.16%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.16%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.16%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.16%
Cyprus
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.16%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.16%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.16%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Mauritius
|
Mauritius, 1, 0.16%
Mauritius
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Mali
|
Mali, 1, 0.16%
Mali
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.16%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 1, 0.16%
Slovakia
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.16%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.16%
Finland
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Central African Republic
|
Central African Republic, 1, 0.16%
Central African Republic
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 1, 0.16%
Ecuador
1 publication, 0.16%
|
Show all (35 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|
2 profile journal articles
Yepes Víctor
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cee51/cee512a5da724e2d632c4503cc9dbe1e8a61ad95" alt="Polytechnic University of Valencia"
Polytechnic University of Valencia
211 publications,
4 287 citations
h-index: 39
2 profile journal articles
CHAMORET Dominique
26 publications,
332 citations
h-index: 10
1 profile journal article
Podryga Viktoriia
79 publications,
148 citations
h-index: 6
1 profile journal article
Pham Ngoc
13 publications,
112 citations
h-index: 6
1 profile journal article
Huňady Róbert
44 publications,
285 citations
h-index: 10