Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
WOS
Q2
Impact factor
2.6
SJR
1.045
CiteScore
4.2
Categories
Rheumatology
Areas
Medicine
Years of issue
1987-2025
journal names
Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America
RHEUM DIS CLIN N AM
Top-3 citing journals

Arthritis & Rheumatism
(1338 citations)

Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America
(908 citations)

Clinical Rheumatology
(875 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Harvard University
(63 publications)

Johns Hopkins University
(53 publications)

Cornell University
(49 publications)

Brigham and Women's Hospital
(10 publications)

Harvard University
(8 publications)

University of Washington
(7 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 337
Q2

Study on dynamic response of cushion layer-reinforced concrete slab under rockfall impact based on smoothed particle hydrodynamics and finite-element method coupling
Mei X., Wu J., Wang T., Wang T., Liang X., Wang Y., Li B., Su T., Xu L.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
In the rockfall prevention and control project, the reinforced concrete (RC) slab and sand (gravel soil) soil cushion layer are commonly used to form the protection structure, thereby resisting the rockfall impact. Considering that the oversized deformation of the cushion layer under impact load using the finite element simulation cannot converge, this article establishes a numerical calculation model using smoothed particle hydrodynamics–finite-element method coupling (SPH–FEM). First, the standard Lagrange finite-element mesh is established for the whole model using ABAQUS, and then the finite-element mesh of the soil cushion layer is converted to SPH particle at the initial moment of the calculation, and finally the calculation results are solved and outputted. The results indicate that, compared with the results of the outdoor rockfall impact test, the relative errors of the rockfall impact force and the displacement of the RC slab are within 10%, which proves the rationality of the coupling algorithm; moreover, in terms of the numerical simulation, the SPH–FEM coupling algorithm is more practical than the finite element for reproducing the mobility of the rockfall impacting the sand and soil particles. In addition, at an impact speed of less than 12 m·s−1, the cushion layer is able to absorb more than 85% of the impact energy, which effectively ensures that the RC slab is in an elastic working state under small impact energy and does not undergo destructive damage under large impact energy; the peak impact force of the rockfall is approximately linear with the velocity, and the simulated value of the peak impact force is basically the same as that of the theoretical value of Hertz theory; the numerical simulation is good for reproducing the damage process of the RC slab in accordance with the actual situation. The SPH–FEM coupling algorithm is more justified than the FEM in simulating the large deformation problem, and it can provide a new calculation method for the design and calculation of the rockfall protection structure.
Q2

Study on the mechanical properties and microstructure of recycled brick aggregate concrete with waste fiber
Wang T., Cui S., Ren X., Zhang W., Yang X., Gong S., Yang D., Li B., Zhang W., Su T., Mei X., Dong X., Duan L., Ma Z., Cao X., et. al.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Recycled concrete technology can promote the sustainable development of the construction industry, but the insufficient mechanical properties of recycled concrete have become a key constraint on its development. By adding waste fibers, the mechanical properties of recycled concrete can be improved, and the problem of disposing of waste polypropylene fibers can be solved. In this article, the effects of recycled brick aggregate content and waste fiber content on the mechanical properties and microstructures of recycled brick aggregate concrete through macroscopic mechanical experiments and microstructure experiments are investigated. The results show that the addition of recycled brick aggregate reduces the mechanical properties of concrete; when the content of recycled brick aggregate is 100%, the compressive strength and splitting tensile strength decrease by 22.04 and 20.00%, respectively. The addition of waste fibers can improve the mechanical properties of recycled brick aggregate concrete, but it is necessary to control the contents of waste fibers in a certain range. When the content of waste fibers is 0.08%, the best improvement effect on the mechanical properties of concrete is achieved; the compressive strength of concrete with a 50% (100%) recycled aggregate replacement rate increases by 6.06% (8.90%), while the splitting tensile strength of concrete with a 50% (100%) recycled aggregate replacement rate increases by 2.30% (6.16%). Through microstructural analysis, the mechanism by which waste fiber improves the mechanical properties of recycled brick aggregate concrete is revealed. The addition of waste fibers has the effect of strengthening the framework inside the recycled brick aggregate concrete, forming a good structural stress system and allowing the recycled brick aggregate concrete to continue to bear loads after cracking. In this study, waste brick aggregate and waste fiber are effectively utilized, which can not only reduce pollution to the environment but also realize the sustainable utilization of resources.
Q2

Coverage and reliability improvement of copper metallization layer in through hole at BGA area during load board manufacture
Zhu K., Xing R., Jiang Z., Zhong R., Chen L., Liu J., Miao H., Zhou G.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The dimple of ball grid array (BGA) area with 70 mm × 70 mm size on load board for high performance integrated circuit final test is investigated by shadow moire at first, the dimple of BGA area decreases from 184.3 to 97.1 μm when six additional prepregs with 60 mm × 60 mm size are added at BGA area before hot lamination process. The micromorphology and stress/strain simulation are conducted to improve the coverage and reliability of copper metallization layer in through hole at that BGA area. The microcracks of electroless copper layer at the position of glass fiber and inner layer copper pad, which leads to serious crack after solder float, are well covered by subsequent electroplating copper layer. When the through holes at BGA area with 0.2 mm diameter and 7.0 mm depth are fabricated based on insulating dielectric material used for high-speed signal transmission, the simulation results point out that IT968 is better than M6G for the thermal shock reliability of through hole metallization layer. A load board vehicle with 126 layers and 8.3 mm thickness based on IT968 shows good interconnection structure reliability after 12 times 288°C solder float.
Q2

Finite element analysis of deterioration of axial compression behavior of corroded steel-reinforced concrete middle-length columns
Nie R., Chen Y., Xing Z., Chen L., Yue Z., Chen W., Chen Y., Chen L., Liu S., Chen J.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 8
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The corrosion problem of steel-reinforced concrete (SRC) columns in coastal areas is becoming increasingly severe and needs to be solved urgently. This study established a numerical analysis model for SRC middle-length columns considering corrosion effects. The bond–slip constitutive relationship between corroded steel and concrete was established. It was found that when the rust rate is low, the bonding stress of SRC columns is slightly increased compared to those without corrosion. The ultimate and residual bonding stress will decrease significantly when the rust rate exceeds 1.5%. The comparison between the numerical analysis model and the experimental results shows that the establishment of the model is reasonable. Subsequent parameter analysis showed that for corroded SRC mid-length columns, the larger the slenderness ratio of the component, the faster the decrease in axial compression performance. The rust rate increased from 0 to 30%, and the axial compression performance of SRC columns decreased significantly. When the rust rate exceeded 30%, the axial compression performance of concrete columns tended to stabilize. A formula for calculating SRC middle-length columns’ ultimate bearing capacity considering corrosion effects has been proposed.
Q2

Effect of impurity components in titanium gypsum on the setting time and mechanical properties of gypsum-slag cementitious materials
Li Y., Jia Z., Li S., Li P., Jiang X., Zhang Z., Yu B.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 1
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The use of titanium gypsum instead of gypsum as a raw material for the preparation of gypsum-slag cementitious materials (GSCM) can reduce the cost and improve the utilization of solid waste. However, titanium gypsum contains impurities such as Fe2O3, MgO, and TiO2, which make its effect on the performance of GSCM uncertain. To investigate this issue, GSCM doped with different ratios of Fe2O3, MgO, and TiO2 were prepared in this study, the setting time and the strength of GSCM at 3, 7, and 28 days were tested. The effects of different oxides on the performance of GSCM were also investigated by scanning electron microscopy, energy spectrum analysis, X-ray diffraction analysis, and thermogravimetric analysis. The experimental results showed that Fe2O3, MgO, and TiO2 all had a certain procoagulant effect on GSCM and a slight effect on the strength. Through micro-analysis, it was found that the main hydration products of GSCM were AFt phase and calcium–alumina–silicate–hydrate (C–(A)–S–H) gels. Fe-rich C–(A)–S–H gels were observed with the addition of Fe2O3, and Mg(OH)2 and M–S–H gels were observed with the addition of MgO. The addition of TiO2 did not result in new hydration products from GSCM.
Q2

Research progress on Fe3+-activated near-infrared phosphor
Sun B., Zhang H., Wang Y.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 3
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Fe3+-activated near-infrared (NIR) luminescent materials have attracted widespread attention due to their tunable emission wavelength and extensive applications in various fields such as plant growth, food analysis, biomedical imaging, and night vision. Many excellent NIR materials have been developed by introducing non-toxic and environmentally friendly Fe3+ ions into different inorganic hosts. This article elucidates the luminescent properties of Fe3+ ions by combining the Tanabe–Sugano energy level diagram and the configuration coordinate model. The latest research progress on Fe3+-doped NIR luminescent materials is outlined, summarizing the luminescent characteristics of various Fe3+-doped materials, including emission wavelength, emission bandwidth, quantum efficiency, and thermal stability. Particularly, a detailed summary and analysis of the application areas of Fe3+-doped NIR luminescent materials are provided. Finally, the future prospects and challenges faced by Fe3+-doped NIR luminescent materials are presented. This review contributes to a deeper understanding of the luminescence mechanism of Fe3+ and the research progress of iron ion-doped luminescent materials, aiming to develop advanced Fe3+-activated NIR luminescent materials with enhanced performance and explore new application fields.
Q2

Experimenting the influence of corncob ash on the mechanical strength of slag-based geopolymer concrete
Wang J., Qu Q., Khan S.A., Alotaibi B.S., Althoey F., Gamil Y., Najeh T.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 1
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The construction sector has been under growing public attention recently as one of the leading causes of climate change and its detrimental effects on local communities. In this regard, geopolymer concrete (GPC) has been proposed as a replacement for conventional concrete. Predicting the concrete’s strength before pouring is, therefore, quite useful. The mechanical strength of slag and corncob ash (SCA–GPC), a GPC made from slag and corncob ash, was predicted utilizing multi-expression programming (MEP). Modeling parameters’ relative importance was determined using sensitivity analysis. When estimating the compressive, flexural, and split tensile strengths of SCA–GPC with MEP, 0.95, 0.93, and 0.92 R
2-values were noted between the target and predicted results. The developed models were validated using statistical tests for error and efficiency. The sensitivity analysis revealed that within the mix proportions, the slag quantity (65%), curing age (25%), and fine aggregate (3.30%) quantity significantly influenced the mechanical strength of SCA–GPC. The MEP models result in distinct empirical equations for the strength characteristics of SCA–GPC, unlike Python-based models, which might aid industry and researchers worldwide in determining optimal mix design proportions, thus eliminating unneeded test repetitions in the laboratory.
Q2

Enhancement of hardness and wear strength of pure Cu and Cu–TiO2 composites via a friction stir process while maintaining electrical resistivity
Alnaser I.A., Yunus M.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 1
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The study aims to enhance the hardness and wear of copper and Cu–TiO2-based composites while maintaining high electrical conductivity through friction stir processing (FSP). It assesses the impact of TiO2 volume fractions and groove widths (GWs) on the wear, hardness, resistivity, and microstructure of FSPed Cu and FSPed Cu–TiO2 surface composite. The samples obtained from the stir zone showed an increase in microhardness of the Cu–TiO2 surface composite due to particle refinement, uniform distribution, and efficient sticking of TiO2 with Cu. Furthermore, the wear rate increased with decreasing TiO2 volume fractions in the composite. The worn surface microstructural analysis indicated a transition from harsh to gentle wear with increasing TiO2 volume fractions and GWs. The average grain size reduced significantly in reinforced stir zones compared to pure Cu, and particle size decreased further with increasing groove size. Hardness increased by 25 and 50% compared to unprocessed Cu, but only a negligible increase in electrical resistivity (2.3% Ωm) after FSP.
Q2

Effect of sand–precursor ratio on mechanical properties and durability of geopolymer mortar with manufactured sand
Zhang P., Su J., Gao Z., Zhang T., Zhang P.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 11
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The geopolymer mortar (GPM) prepared from industrial by-products and alkali activation solution (AAS) is one of the hot spots of current building materials. As a feasible alternative to natural river sand, manufactured sand (MS) alleviates the global ecological pressure. In this study, MS was used for fine aggregate. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) solution were used as AAS. Metakaolin (MK) and fly ash (FA) were used as the precursor to prepare MK-FA-based GPM with MS (MS-GPM), which was of great significance for saving non-renewable resources, mitigating the greenhouse effect, and recycling waste. Numerous studies were conducted to explore the effect of sand–precursor ratio (r
sp) on mechanical and durability characteristics of MS-GPM. Relationships between compressive strength and tensile or flexural strength were established by linear fitting equation. Finally, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to systematically calculate the effect of r
sp on performance. The results indicated that the mechanical strength and impermeability of MS-GPM decreased and crack resistance increased with r
sp from 1 to 5. The strength of MS-GPM was the best when r
sp was 1. With the increase of r
sp, the proportion of MS in MS-GPM increases, and the relative cementitious material decreases, which has an adverse impact on mechanical properties and impermeability. Linear fitting revealed that the compressive strength of MS-GPM was closely related to tensile strength and flexural strength. ANOVA results indicated that r
sp in the range of 1–5 had great effects on the performance of MS-GPM. The aim of this article is to further promote the possibility of applying MS-GPM in practical engineering by designing reasonable r
sp.
Q2

Exploring the viability of AI-aided genetic algorithms in estimating the crack repair rate of self-healing concrete
Tian Q., Lu Y., Zhou J., Song S., Yang L., Cheng T., Huang J.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 4
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
As a potential replacement for traditional concrete, which has cracking and poor durability issues, self-healing concrete (SHC) has been the research subject. However, conducting lab trials can be expensive and time-consuming. Therefore, machine learning (ML)-based predictions can aid improved formulations of self-healing concrete. The aim of this work is to develop ML models that could analyze and forecast the rate of healing of the cracked area (CrA) of bacteria- and fiber-containing SHC. These models were constructed using gene expression programming (GEP) and multi-expression programming (MEP) tools. The discrepancy between expected and desired results, statistical tests, Taylor’s diagram, and R
2 values were additional metrics used to assess the constructed models. A SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach was used to evaluate which input attributes were highly relevant. With R
2 = 0.93, MAE = 0.047, MAPE = 12.60%, and RMSE = 0.062, the GEP produced somewhat worse predictions than the MEP (R
2 = 0.93, MAE = 0.033, MAPE = 9.60%, and RMSE = 0.044). Bacteria had an indirect (negative) relationship with the CrA of SHC, while fiber had a direct (positive) association, according to the SHAP study. The SHAP study might help researchers and companies figure out how much of each raw material is needed for SHCs. Therefore, MEP and GEP models can be used to generate and test SHC compositions based on bacteria and polymeric fibers.
Q2

Grinding force model for ultrasonic assisted grinding of γ-TiAl intermetallic compounds and experimental validation
Li Z., Yang S., Liu X., Xiao G., San H., Zhang Y., Wang W., Yang Z.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
The introduction of ultrasonic vibration in the grinding process of γ-TiAl intermetallic compounds can significantly reduce its processing difficulty. It is of great significance to understand the grinding mechanism of γ-TiAl intermetallic compounds and improve the processing efficiency by studying the mechanism of ordinary grinding of abrasive grains. Based on this, this study proposes a grinding force prediction model based on single-grain ultrasonic assisted grinding (UAG) chip formation mechanism. First, the prediction model of grinding force is established based on the chip formation mechanism of abrasive sliding ordinary grinding and the theory of ultrasonic assisted machining, considering the plastic deformation and shear effect in the process of material processing. Second, the UAG experiment of γ-TiAl intermetallic compounds was carried out by using diamond grinding wheel, and the unknown coefficient in the model was determined. Finally, the predicted values and experimental values of grinding force under different parameters were compared to verify the rationality of the model. It was found that the maximum deviation between the predicted value of tangential force and the actual value is 23%, and the maximum deviation between the predicted value of normal force and the actual value is 21.7%. In addition, by changing the relevant parameters, the model can predict the grinding force of different metal materials under different processing parameters, which is helpful for optimizing the UAG parameters and improving the processing efficiency.
Q2

Ultrasonic resonance evaluation method for deep interfacial debonding defects of multilayer adhesive bonded materials
Guo C., Xu C., Xiao D., Cheng G., Zhong Y., Ding J.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Multilayer adhesive bonded structures/materials (MABS) are widely used as structural components, especially in the field of aerospace. However, for MABS workpieces, the facts that the weak echo of the deep interfacial debonding defects (DB) caused by the large acoustic attenuation coefficient of each layer and this echo, which generally aliases with the excitation wave and the backwall echo of the surface layer, pose a great challenge for the conventional longitudinal wave ultrasonic nondestructive testing methods. In this work, an ultrasonic resonance evaluation method for deep interfacial DBs of MABS is proposed based on the ultrasonic resonance theory and the aliasing effect of ultrasonic waves in MABS. Theoretical and simulation analysis show that the optimal inspection frequency for II-interfacial DBs is 500 kHz when the shell thickness is 1.5 mm and the ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM) thickness is 1.5 mm, and the optimal inspection frequency is 250 kHz when the shell thickness is 1.5 or 2.0 mm and the EPDM thickness is 2.0 mm. Verification experiments show that the presence of a DB in the II-interface causes a resonance effect, and in the same inspection configuration, the larger the defect size, the more pronounced this effect is. This resonance effect manifests itself as an increase in the amplitude and an increase in the vibration time of the A-scan signal as well as a pronounced change in the frequency of the received ultrasonic wave. In addition, the increase in the excitation voltage further highlights the ultrasonic resonance effect. Four imaging methods – the integrations of the signal and the signal envelope curve, the maximum amplitude of the fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the signal, and the signal energy – were used for C-scan imaging of ultrasonic resonance evaluation of MABS’s deep interfacial DBs and all these methods can clearly show the sizes and locations of the artificial defects and internal natural defect. The normalized C-scan imaging method proposed in this study can further highlight the weak changes in the signals in the C-scan image. The research results of this study have laid a solid theoretical and practical foundation for the ultrasonic resonance evaluation of MABS.
Q2

Powder metallurgy processing of high entropy alloys: Bibliometric analysis and systematic review
Akinwekomi A.D., Bamisaye O.S., Bodunrin M.O.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Research attention in powder metallurgy (PM) processing of high-entropy alloys (HEAs) is rising. Some reviews have been published but a detailed historical analysis to identify the thematic research areas and prospective future research areas is lacking. Therefore, this study presents a bibliometric literature analysis of PM-processed HEAs by mapping and clustering 700 articles published between 2007 and August 2022 in the Scopus database. The most prolific authors, their collaborators, institutions, and most preferred journals publishing PM-HEA works are identified and mapped. Publication trend shows that significant research attention in the PM processing of HEAs began to gain traction in 2016. The top three journals in this field are Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Materials Science and Engineering A, and Intermetallics. However, co-authorship network analysis does not reveal significant inter-institutional research collaboration indicating that strengthening this area could help to accelerate scientific discovery, enhance technology transfer, and commercialization of HEA products. Based on the co-occurrence frequencies of author keywords, popular research directions are identified, and a systematic review of emerging functional applications is undertaken. This work provides a comprehensive visual reference guide for researchers to deepen their knowledge of this field and delivers insight into prospective future research opportunities to stimulate further ground-breaking works.
Q2

Marine polymers in tissue bioprinting: Current achievements and challenges
Banach-Kopeć A., Mania S., Tylingo R.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Bioprinting has a critical role in tissue engineering, allowing the creation of sophisticated cellular scaffolds with high resolution, shape fidelity, and cell viability. Achieving these parameters remains a challenge, necessitating bioinks that are biocompatible, printable, and biodegradable. This review highlights the potential of marine-derived polymers and crosslinking techniques including mammalian collagen and gelatin along with their marine equivalents. While denaturation temperatures vary based on origin, warm-water fish collagen and gelatin emerge as promising solutions. Building on the applications of mammalian collagen and gelatin, this study investigates their marine counterparts. Diverse research groups present different perspectives on printability and cell survival. Despite advances, current scaffolds are limited in size and layers, making applications such as extensive skin burn treatment or tissue regeneration difficult. The authors argue for the development of bioprinting, which includes spherical and adaptive printing. In adaptive printing, layers differentiate and propagate sequentially to overcome the challenges of multilayer printing and provide optimal conditions for the growth of deeply embedded cells. Moving the boundaries of bioprinting, future prospects include transformative applications in regenerative medicine.
Q2

Exploring the potential of agricultural waste as an additive in ultra-high-performance concrete for sustainable construction: A comprehensive review
Zhao J., Sufian M., Abuhussain M.A., Althoey F., Deifalla A.F.
Q2
Reviews on Advanced Materials Science
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 2
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
This study thoroughly reviews the recent design methods for ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) with agricultural waste. The goal is to identify UHPC composites that meets environmental sustainability requirements while fulfilling workability, durability, and mechanical properties. The capacity of typical review studies is limited in bridging the various literature aspects systematically. The article includes comparative analyses identifying these methods’ intrinsic connections and current trends. The analysis indicates that 71% of documents on incorporating agricultural waste into UHPC are in the “Engineering” and “Materials Science” disciplines, with 69% being journal articles, and 27% conference documents. Significant research keywords involve “Ultra-High-Performance Concrete,” “Cements,” “Sustainable Development,” and “Agricultural Wastes,” highlighting the extensive exploration of agricultural waste in UHPC. It has been discovered that agricultural waste can replace silica fume in UHPC, improving strength and durability by reducing pore volume and enhancing microstructure. Substituting 5–30% of cement with rice husk ash significantly boosts compressive strength, enhancing cement hydration, pore structure, and pozzolanic reaction, offering substantial environmental benefits and supporting the construction industry’s contribution to low-carbon sustainable development. This article provides guidance and recommendations for developing sustainable UHPC to meet diverse design specifications, promoting environmentally friendly construction practices.
Top-100
Citing journals
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
|
Arthritis & Rheumatism
1338 citations, 2.23%
|
|
Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America
908 citations, 1.51%
|
|
Clinical Rheumatology
875 citations, 1.46%
|
|
Lupus
822 citations, 1.37%
|
|
Rheumatology
756 citations, 1.26%
|
|
Rheumatology International
673 citations, 1.12%
|
|
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
564 citations, 0.94%
|
|
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
500 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Arthritis Care and Research
472 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Journal of Rheumatology
472 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Best Practice and Research in Clinical Rheumatology
450 citations, 0.75%
|
|
Current Rheumatology Reports
427 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Current Opinion in Rheumatology
426 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
368 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Frontiers in Immunology
344 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Rheumatology
340 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Autoimmunity Reviews
333 citations, 0.56%
|
|
PLoS ONE
318 citations, 0.53%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
293 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Arthritis Research and Therapy
266 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Medicine (United States)
242 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
239 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Reumatologia Clinica
237 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Cureus
235 citations, 0.39%
|
|
International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases
229 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Journal of Immunology
224 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology
224 citations, 0.37%
|
|
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
223 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Arthritis and Rheumatology
209 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Modern Rheumatology
209 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Scientific Reports
201 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Nature reviews. Rheumatology
183 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Revue du Rhumatisme (Edition Francaise)
182 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Medicine (Barcelona)
179 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie
175 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Frontiers in Medicine
175 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
161 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Joint Bone Spine
158 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Clinical Reviews in Allergy and Immunology
158 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
157 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Handbook of Systemic Autoimmune Diseases
157 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Revista Colombiana de Reumatologia
154 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Reumatología Clínica (English Edition)
152 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Baillière s Clinical Rheumatology
146 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Expert Review of Clinical Immunology
144 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Pediatric Rheumatology
130 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Autoimmunity
124 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Clinical and Experimental Immunology
111 citations, 0.19%
|
|
RMD Open
109 citations, 0.18%
|
|
EMC - Appareil locomoteur
107 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Frontiers in Pharmacology
106 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Clinical Immunology
106 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain
100 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Rheumatology and Therapy
95 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Autoimmunity
94 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Mayo Clinic Proceedings
92 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Osteoporosis International
92 citations, 0.15%
|
|
BMJ Case Reports
90 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
90 citations, 0.15%
|
|
New England Journal of Medicine
88 citations, 0.15%
|
|
American Journal of Medicine
87 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease
86 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Medicina Clinica
84 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Revue de Medecine Interne
83 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Pediatric Clinics of North America
82 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Pain
81 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Radiologic Clinics of North America
81 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Immunopharmacology
79 citations, 0.13%
|
|
American Journal of the Medical Sciences
77 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Clinics in Dermatology
76 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia
74 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Medical Clinics of North America
73 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Skeletal Radiology
73 citations, 0.12%
|
|
British Journal of Dermatology
72 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Nutrients
71 citations, 0.12%
|
|
The Lancet
69 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Actas Dermo-Sifiliograficas
69 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders
69 citations, 0.12%
|
|
ACR Open Rheumatology
69 citations, 0.12%
|
|
EMC - Aparato Locomotor
69 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
67 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Current Pain and Headache Reports
66 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Presse Medicale
66 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
66 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Arthroplasty
65 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
63 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Internal Medicine
63 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Indian Journal of Rheumatology
63 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Neurologic Clinics
62 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Drugs and Aging
62 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
62 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Inflammopharmacology
61 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
58 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Dermatology
58 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Biological Chemistry
57 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Lupus Science and Medicine
57 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Postgraduate Medicine
57 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Rheumatic Diseases
56 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America
55 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Diagnostics
55 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
Citing publishers
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
|
|
Elsevier
16808 citations, 28.02%
|
|
Springer Nature
9296 citations, 15.5%
|
|
Wiley
6410 citations, 10.69%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
2835 citations, 4.73%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
2753 citations, 4.59%
|
|
SAGE
2036 citations, 3.39%
|
|
MDPI
1555 citations, 2.59%
|
|
Oxford University Press
1477 citations, 2.46%
|
|
BMJ
1274 citations, 2.12%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
1086 citations, 1.81%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
606 citations, 1.01%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
484 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
383 citations, 0.64%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
325 citations, 0.54%
|
|
The Journal of Rheumatology
308 citations, 0.51%
|
|
The American Association of Immunologists
229 citations, 0.38%
|
|
218 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
212 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
185 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Asociacion Colombiana de Reumatologia
173 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
161 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
134 citations, 0.22%
|
|
S. Karger AG
128 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Korean College of Rheumatology
120 citations, 0.2%
|
|
JMIR Publications
115 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
113 citations, 0.19%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
108 citations, 0.18%
|
|
The Haworth Press
107 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
102 citations, 0.17%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
97 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Massachusetts Medical Society
97 citations, 0.16%
|
|
American Physiological Society
92 citations, 0.15%
|
|
IntechOpen
85 citations, 0.14%
|
|
SLACK
83 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
80 citations, 0.13%
|
|
OMICS Publishing Group
76 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Mediar Press
76 citations, 0.13%
|
|
The Egyptian Society for Joint Diseases and Arthritis
74 citations, 0.12%
|
|
SciELO
72 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
71 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)
71 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
69 citations, 0.12%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
67 citations, 0.11%
|
|
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
65 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
63 citations, 0.11%
|
|
The Endocrine Society
60 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Medknow
58 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
55 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IMA Press, LLC
54 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Society for Clinical Investigation
52 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Roentgen Ray Society
49 citations, 0.08%
|
|
45 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
45 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
44 citations, 0.07%
|
|
European Respiratory Society (ERS)
41 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Annual Reviews
41 citations, 0.07%
|
|
British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
40 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Sports Physical Therapy Section
40 citations, 0.07%
|
|
XMLink
40 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Society of Hematology
39 citations, 0.07%
|
|
IOS Press
36 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Veterinary Medical Association
36 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Thoracic Society
35 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
34 citations, 0.06%
|
|
34 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
34 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
32 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Edizioni Minerva Medica
32 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Society for Nutrition
31 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Society of Nephrology
30 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Consilium Medicum
30 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
30 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology
28 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Eco-Vector LLC
26 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IOP Publishing
26 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Southern Medical Association
26 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
25 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Media Sphere Publishing House
25 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Termedia Sp. z.o.o.
24 citations, 0.04%
|
|
F1000 Research
24 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Rockefeller University Press
22 citations, 0.04%
|
|
22 citations, 0.04%
|
|
PAGEPress Publications
22 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Human Kinetics
22 citations, 0.04%
|
|
World Scientific
21 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB)
21 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Society of Physical Therapy Science
21 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
20 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Hans Publishers
20 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Association of Clinical Endocrinology
18 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
17 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Impact Journals
17 citations, 0.03%
|
|
British Institute of Radiology
17 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Remedium, Ltd.
17 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Scientific Scholar
17 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Korean Association of Internal Medicine
17 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
16 citations, 0.03%
|
|
15 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Associacao Paulista de Medicina
15 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
15 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
Harvard University
63 publications, 2.4%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
53 publications, 2.02%
|
|
Cornell University
49 publications, 1.87%
|
|
Brigham and Women's Hospital
44 publications, 1.68%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
44 publications, 1.68%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
39 publications, 1.49%
|
|
Cleveland Clinic
39 publications, 1.49%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
37 publications, 1.41%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
34 publications, 1.3%
|
|
University of Toronto
34 publications, 1.3%
|
|
Boston University
33 publications, 1.26%
|
|
University of Michigan
29 publications, 1.11%
|
|
Stanford University
28 publications, 1.07%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
28 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Northwestern University
25 publications, 0.95%
|
|
New York University
25 publications, 0.95%
|
|
Oregon Health & Science University
24 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
24 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Duke University Hospital
23 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Washington
21 publications, 0.8%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
21 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
20 publications, 0.76%
|
|
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
19 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of British Columbia
14 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Toronto Western Hospital
14 publications, 0.53%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
13 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Indiana University School of Medicine
13 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Southern California
12 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Columbia University
12 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
12 publications, 0.46%
|
|
McGill University
12 publications, 0.46%
|
|
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
12 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Hospital for Sick Children
12 publications, 0.46%
|
|
George Washington University
11 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
11 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
10 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
10 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Medical College of Wisconsin
10 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Western University
10 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Nebraska Medical Center
10 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
10 publications, 0.38%
|
|
King's College London
9 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Manchester
9 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Yale University
9 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Arizona
9 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Ruhr University Bochum
9 publications, 0.34%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
9 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Leeds
9 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Emory University
9 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Calgary
9 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Alberta
9 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Genoa
8 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Melbourne
8 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Georgetown University
8 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
8 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Duke University
8 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Tufts University
8 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of South Florida
8 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
8 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University Medical Center Utrecht
8 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
8 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Louisiana State University
8 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Cincinnati
8 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Birmingham
7 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center
7 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Medical Center
7 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Paris Cité University
7 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Illinois at Peoria
7 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Dartmouth College
7 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center
7 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
7 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore
7 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Ottawa
7 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Florida
7 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans
7 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Wake Forest University
7 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
7 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Children's National Hospital
7 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Utah
7 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
6 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Skåne University Hospital
6 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Medical University of Vienna
6 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Ghent University Hospital
6 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Monash University
6 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Boston Children's Hospital
6 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Rush University Medical Center
6 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Chicago
6 publications, 0.23%
|
|
McGill University Health Centre
6 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Thomas Jefferson University
6 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
6 publications, 0.23%
|
|
University of Miami
6 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
6 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Montreal General Hospital
6 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Sheba Medical Center
5 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Karolinska University Hospital
5 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Auckland
5 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Georgetown University Medical Center
5 publications, 0.19%
|
|
New York University Langone Health
5 publications, 0.19%
|
|
McMaster University
5 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Minnesota
5 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
|
|
Brigham and Women's Hospital
10 publications, 2.42%
|
|
Harvard University
8 publications, 1.93%
|
|
University of Washington
7 publications, 1.69%
|
|
Stanford University
6 publications, 1.45%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
6 publications, 1.45%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
6 publications, 1.45%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
5 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Duke University
5 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
5 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Cornell University
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Northwestern University
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
McGill University
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Seattle Children's Hospital
4 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Ghent University Hospital
3 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Austin Health
3 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
3 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
3 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Medical Center
3 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of British Columbia
3 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
3 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Calgary
3 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Toronto Western Hospital
3 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
3 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Cincinnati
3 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Ghent University
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University College London
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Saint Joseph University
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Yale University
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Melbourne
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Monash University
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
George Washington University
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Dalhousie University
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Duke University Hospital
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Boston Children's Hospital
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Rush University Medical Center
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Chicago
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Michigan
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Ruhr University Bochum
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Leeds
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Emory University
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Toronto
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Alberta
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Cleveland Clinic
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Nationwide Children's Hospital
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Hospital for Sick Children
2 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Peking University
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
University of Genoa
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
University of Bordeaux
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
University Hospital Heidelberg
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
Heidelberg University
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
Technische Universität Dresden
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
University of New South Wales
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
Aarhus University
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
Maastricht University Medical Center+
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
Stony Brook University
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
University of Birmingham
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
University of Glasgow
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
Istituto Giannina Gaslini
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
University of Auckland
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
University of Otago
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
Monash Health
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
MedStar Georgetown University Hospital
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
Boston University
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
Oregon Health & Science University
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
New York University Langone Health
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
New York University
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
Ohio State University
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
Yale New Haven Hospital
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
UC San Diego Health
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
UC Davis Health System
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
University of Arizona
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
Rush University
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
Northeastern University
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
University of Ghana
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
McGill University Health Centre
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
Baylor College of Medicine
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
National Institute for Environmental Studies
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
University Medical Center Utrecht
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
University Medical Centre Mannheim
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
University of East Anglia
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
University of Barcelona
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
University of Manitoba
1 publication, 0.24%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
|
Publishing countries
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
|
USA
|
USA, 1285, 48.99%
USA
1285 publications, 48.99%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 120, 4.57%
Canada
120 publications, 4.57%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 103, 3.93%
United Kingdom
103 publications, 3.93%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 52, 1.98%
Germany
52 publications, 1.98%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 41, 1.56%
Netherlands
41 publications, 1.56%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 30, 1.14%
Italy
30 publications, 1.14%
|
France
|
France, 29, 1.11%
France
29 publications, 1.11%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 28, 1.07%
Australia
28 publications, 1.07%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 16, 0.61%
Mexico
16 publications, 0.61%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 16, 0.61%
Sweden
16 publications, 0.61%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 13, 0.5%
Belgium
13 publications, 0.5%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 12, 0.46%
Austria
12 publications, 0.46%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 12, 0.46%
Spain
12 publications, 0.46%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 11, 0.42%
Finland
11 publications, 0.42%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 9, 0.34%
Israel
9 publications, 0.34%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 9, 0.34%
Switzerland
9 publications, 0.34%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 8, 0.3%
Japan
8 publications, 0.3%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 7, 0.27%
Denmark
7 publications, 0.27%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 7, 0.27%
Ireland
7 publications, 0.27%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 6, 0.23%
Greece
6 publications, 0.23%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 6, 0.23%
New Zealand
6 publications, 0.23%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 6, 0.23%
Norway
6 publications, 0.23%
|
China
|
China, 5, 0.19%
China
5 publications, 0.19%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 5, 0.19%
Brazil
5 publications, 0.19%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 5, 0.19%
Republic of Korea
5 publications, 0.19%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 4, 0.15%
Argentina
4 publications, 0.15%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 4, 0.15%
Colombia
4 publications, 0.15%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 4, 0.15%
Turkey
4 publications, 0.15%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 3, 0.11%
Portugal
3 publications, 0.11%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 3, 0.11%
Peru
3 publications, 0.11%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 2, 0.08%
Lebanon
2 publications, 0.08%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 2, 0.08%
Singapore
2 publications, 0.08%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 2, 0.08%
Slovakia
2 publications, 0.08%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.08%
Chile
2 publications, 0.08%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 2, 0.08%
South Africa
2 publications, 0.08%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.04%
Russia
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.04%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.04%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 1, 0.04%
Egypt
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 1, 0.04%
Zimbabwe
1 publication, 0.04%
|
India
|
India, 1, 0.04%
India
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.04%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.04%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.04%
|
USSR
|
USSR, 1, 0.04%
USSR
1 publication, 0.04%
|
Show all (14 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
|
USA
|
USA, 101, 24.4%
USA
101 publications, 24.4%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 17, 4.11%
Canada
17 publications, 4.11%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 8, 1.93%
United Kingdom
8 publications, 1.93%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 6, 1.45%
Australia
6 publications, 1.45%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 5, 1.21%
Germany
5 publications, 1.21%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 5, 1.21%
Netherlands
5 publications, 1.21%
|
France
|
France, 4, 0.97%
France
4 publications, 0.97%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 4, 0.97%
Belgium
4 publications, 0.97%
|
China
|
China, 2, 0.48%
China
2 publications, 0.48%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 2, 0.48%
Argentina
2 publications, 0.48%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 2, 0.48%
Italy
2 publications, 0.48%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 2, 0.48%
Lebanon
2 publications, 0.48%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.24%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.24%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.24%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.24%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.24%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.24%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.24%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.24%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 1, 0.24%
New Zealand
1 publication, 0.24%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.24%
Peru
1 publication, 0.24%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.24%
Chile
1 publication, 0.24%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 1, 0.24%
Switzerland
1 publication, 0.24%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 1, 0.24%
Japan
1 publication, 0.24%
|
20
40
60
80
100
120
|