Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
3
SJR
0.297
CiteScore
2.9
Categories
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Areas
Arts and Humanities
Social Sciences
Years of issue
1977-2025
journal names
Evaluation Review
EVALUATION REV
Top-3 citing journals

Evaluation Review
(1137 citations)

Evaluation and Program Planning
(542 citations)

American Journal of Evaluation
(371 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of California, Los Angeles
(53 publications)

Northwestern University
(32 publications)

Harvard University
(29 publications)

Harvard University
(5 publications)

University of Castilla-La Mancha
(4 publications)

University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City
(4 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 1001
Q2

Description and provider perspectives on a school‐based speech/mental health co‐therapy model for students with intellectual/developmental disabilities
Müller E., Offutt K., Kern A., Oginz J., Stromberg M.
AbstractThe purpose of this article is to (a) provide a detailed description of how one school in the United States developed decision‐making guidelines for implementing a speech‐language/mental health (SLP/MHP) co‐therapy service delivery model, and (b) summarize study findings based on interviews conducted with school‐based speech‐language pathologists (SLPs), school‐based licensed mental health providers (MHPs), and administrators about their perceptions of using this co‐therapy model to provide services to students with intellectual/developmental disabilities (e.g., autism) and co‐occurring language and mental health support needs. We used qualitative analysis to identify key themes from the 19 interviews we conducted with school‐based staff, including SLPs, MHPs and administrators. Thematic analysis indicated that: (a) students demonstrated progress during co‐therapy and benefited from its more holistic approach to complex, interdisciplinary content and skills; (b) SLPs felt more confident handling their students' emotional regulation needs, challenging behaviours and/or other mental health support needs; and (c) MHPs felt more confident adapting language to make therapeutic content accessible to their students with language support needs. Interviewees also discussed logistical challenges and recommendations for further guidance/training. Findings from interviews indicate that SLP/MHP co‐therapy may offer a promising service delivery option for students with intellectual/developmental disabilities receiving both speech‐language and mental health services through their individualized education programs (IEPs).
Q2

What makes students strong? A student's voice study on resilience
Ganotz‐Steinborn T., Schwab S.
AbstractIn times of crisis, resilience—the ability to cope with challenges—has become crucial, especially for primary school students facing issues such as the climate crisis, the war in Ukraine, educational disadvantages, or family‐related struggles. This is particularly true for students with special educational needs (SEN) or those from migrant backgrounds. The present study explores the factors that foster resilience in these students. Using a sequential explanatory design, the study involved two phases. In the first phase, resilience was measured through a paper‐and‐pencil questionnaire (N = 882 primary school students from Germany). In the second phase, 13 highly resilient students were interviewed using a semi‐structured guide. Quantitative results showed that overall, students demonstrated a high tendency towards resilience. Multilevel regression analysis revealed that personal factors (e.g., family language, SEN), relationships with peers and teachers, and school resources were significant predictors of resilience. Qualitative findings indicated that personal resources—such as self‐efficacy and emotional regulation—were more influential for resilience than external factors like family or community resources.
Q2

Systematic review on flexi‐schooling of autistic students
Richter M., Nishnik J., Borrmann A., Grummt M., Lindmeier C.
AbstractFlexi‐schooling, an approach involving at least some instruction both at home and at school, has potential to adapt education to meet the needs of autistic students while also providing in‐person school benefits. This systematic international literature review of flexi‐schooling for autistic students aims to understand the advantages and disadvantages of this practice, why flexi‐schooling is chosen and the factors for a successful implementation. Eight hundred and fifty‐five studies were screened, of which eight met the search criteria and were analysed using thematic analysis. Flexi‐schooling is seen as a way to provide autistic students with an education that is constructed to meet individual needs and is flexible enough to address changes. Nevertheless, it can also be a challenging process that requires commitment, trust and additional effort from parents and teachers and may face various barriers. Flexi‐schooling can be difficult to implement due to power imbalances between school and home and a lack of communication and cooperation. Flexi‐schooling is an idea that has not yet been widely implemented in practice, and there is little information available about how it is put into action. Although it is rarely a first choice, it is often considered as a positive solution to a challenging and constantly changing situation.
Q2

Recommendation section of psychoeducational reports: A barrier or opportunity to promote inclusion in early education and care?
Vaags A., Uthus M.
AbstractPsychoeducational reports prepared by the Educational Psychological Service are foundational for special educational support in Norway, ensuring equitable opportunities for development, learning and participation among children with special educational needs in mainstream Early Childhood Education and Care settings. This qualitative study examines the characteristics of recommended goals and support measures in these reports, and how they promote or inhibit inclusion. Through a holistic approach, the study explores individual and social contextual considerations within the recommendation sections of seven reports for children aged 3–5 years. Employing reflexive thematic analysis, our findings suggest that while certain measures promote children's participation in inclusive communities, there is a predominant focus on the individual child. This emphasis often centres on skill acquisition and ability development through performance‐based goals and compensatory measures. However, while most recommendations are individually oriented, certain measures appear generalised and broadly applicable to most children, highlighting the challenges of addressing each child's unique needs in their specific context. The study's implications underscore the necessity for a holistic approach in the field of special education, both at the policy and legislative levels. Such an approach is essential for enabling psychoeducational reports to promote inclusion in early childhood education and care settings.
Q2

Investigating potential tactile strategies of students with deafblindness: An exploratory study
Papazafiri M., Argyropoulos V.
AbstractThe purpose of this study was to investigate and describe tactile exploratory behaviours and strategies applied by students with deafblindness when they actively explore objects by touch in terms of their texture and weight. For the needs of the present study, a Delphi consultation methodology was applied by the authors and special education teachers. The students were invited to participate in matching activities with familiar objects focusing on texture and weight, respectively. The analysis revealed that the students adopted a combination of tactile exploratory behaviours and strategies in order to identify an object's texture and weight. It seemed that the tactile exploratory strategy ‘Pressure’ in combination with a variety of tactile behaviours such as banging, shaking or/and rotating was in common. The results may contribute to the formation of more sophisticated individualized educational plans giving emphasis on active touch. Tactile exploratory strategies procedures are considered to be of high importance for students with deafblindness since they constitute ‘roadmaps’ for them to build‐up their knowledge following a ‘kinesthetic reasoning’.
Q2

Ethical issues in special needs educators' consultation: Examples from the Swedish context
Hansson S., Lindblom A.
AbstractThe purpose of this study is to produce new insights of ethical issues in special needs educators' (SNEs) consultation with teachers in Swedish schools, by using the theoretical lens of Løgstrup's (1997) theory the Ethical Demand. The research questions concern (1) how the SNEs describe the content of their consultation and (2) how the SNEs describe how they deal with resistance to consultation. Semi‐structured interviews with eight SNEs were analysed by using the theory of The Ethical Demand by Løgstrup. Main results are that consultation is viewed as widening the thinking of the teachers and resistance is dealt with by SNEs avoiding undesired consultation. Resistance to consultation is regarded as a way for teachers to maintain their integrity when being forced to consultation. The study reveals that ethical issues are deeply integrated in consultation and the use of the theory of the Ethical Demand sheds new light on the ethical‐philosophical grounds in SNEs' consultation practice.
Q2

Martin‐Denham, S. (2024) ‘Nana, don't bother buying us new shoes, 'cos I'll not be there two minutes’: Evaluating the effectiveness of assessment hubs in re‐integrating children at risk of school exclusion into mainstream school
Martin‐Denham S.
AbstractThis mixed‐methods study sought to determine the effectiveness of assessment hubs in re‐integrating children at risk of school exclusion into mainstream school. First, the assessment hubs provided attendance and exclusion data for 39 children who attended the hubs (KS2, n = 11 and KS3, n = 28) between January 2020 and January 2022. Second, 23 semi‐structured interviews adopting a hermeneutic phenomenological approach were conducted with caregivers of children who attended a hub. Third, three theographs depicting children's schooling were created. Quantitative data showed that 2/11 KS2 and 10/28 KS3 children successfully reintegrated into mainstream secondary school after attending an assessment hub. The remaining children were in alternative provision, either permanently or awaiting an EHC plan for specialist provision. Three themes were developed through thematic analysis of the interviews: a perfect storm; it's not rocket science; and hang on. The caregivers needed confidence in the ability of mainstream secondary schools to provide the right support at the right time in the right environment. The study found that the assessment hubs were effective in building positive relationships and supporting caregivers to understand reasons for their children's behaviours. In some cases, the assessment hubs effectively secured the most appropriate provision to meet children's needs. Most of the children needed to remain in AP permanently or await an EHC needs assessment to secure a place in specialist provision.
Q2

Teachers' knowledge of dyslexia in one of the largest regions of Kazakhstan
Galimzhanova G.
AbstractThe purpose of the present research was to measure teachers' knowledge about dyslexia in mainstream schools of Akmola region in Kazakhstan and to analyse if there is any relationship between teachers' knowledge of dyslexia and their training experiences. The data was collected via an online survey with the use of the Scale of Knowledge and Beliefs about Developmental Dyslexia (Soriano‐Ferrer & Echegaray‐Bengoa, 2014). Overall, 1435 teachers participated in the survey. The research revealed that surveyed teachers have limited knowledge about dyslexia across three layers: neurological, cognitive and behavioural. Cross‐tabulation analysis showed that there is no relationship between teachers' knowledge of dyslexia and their training experiences. These findings highlight a high need for quality training on dyslexia for teachers in Kazakhstan.
Q2

Parent coaching behaviours in in‐person and telepractice early intervention for children with hearing loss
Tutuk H.C., Çavuşoğlu T., Atlar Yıldırım H., Gürgür H.
AbstractFamily‐Centered Early Intervention (FCEI) involves developing parents' knowledge and skills through parent coaching to support the listening and language development of their children with hearing loss. The traditional delivery of parent coaching at FCEI has been in in‐person settings. With the advancement of technology, telepractice has become widespread. This has increased the diversity of service delivery, especially for children with hearing loss who face difficulty accessing a qualified interventionist. This study examined the parent coaching behaviours of an educator providing early intervention services to children with hearing loss and their parents in in‐person and telepractice settings. The research is a qualitative case study. Data were collected through observation, an interview, documents and a research diary. The results indicated that implementing feedback, modelling and guided practice varied due to challenges in engaging children during telepractice sessions. In‐person, these behaviours were applied within the activity involving both parent and child. In telepractice, feedback and modelling were limited to discussions with the parent, and guided practice was not demonstrated. The results suggest that, despite the educator's efforts to find solutions, structural limitations may have limited the support parents received from telepractice sessions compared to in‐person sessions.
Q2

Enhancing motivation in Filipino learners with ADHD : Insights from kindergarten mesosystems
Lukban A.S., Custodio Z.U., Datu J.A., Arrieta C.L., Estacio A.J., Julian A.F., Paet M.G., Andrada L.D.
AbstractAttention‐Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental condition that impacts approximately 5% of children worldwide. Children with this ADHD often struggle with behavioural issues that disrupt their ability to meet the demands of learning in educational settings. This research aims to identify the motivational strategies used by primary caregivers to address the challenging behaviours of Filipino kindergarteners diagnosed with ADHD via a qualitative research design. Focus group discussions and one‐on‐one interviews were conducted with 11 primary caregivers of children with ADHD. The findings identified the challenges faced and support strategies used by caregivers—parents or guardians—in supporting children with this neurodevelopmental disorder. This study highlights the motivational and academic benefits associated with employing preparatory, remediation, and teacher‐caregiver collaborative, and activity engagement strategies to address the needs of young children with ADHD. These findings underscore the importance of capacity‐building initiatives aimed at supporting caregivers of children with ADHD.
Q2

Modelling inclusive education. The Didactic Model for Inclusive Teaching and Learning as a heuristic for inclusion research and teacher education
Frohn J.
AbstractResearch on inclusive education has gained major importance over the last decade. However, in the English‐speaking discourse, empirical studies on inclusive teaching and learning often lack connections to existing educational theories that focus on the interrelation of teachers, learners and content as the three focal points of teaching and learning in a greater societal context. This corresponds with a lack of comprehensive models of inclusive education for teacher education. This theoretical paper therefore presents the ‘Didactic Model for Inclusive Teaching and Learning’ (DIMILL), developed in an interdisciplinary research team as a theoretical and practical framework for inclusion research and teacher education. Following an introduction on the necessity of modelling inclusive education in school settings, the German tradition of ‘didactics’ will be contextualized in the international field, pointing out its potential for educational theory and teacher education. Then, individual parts of DIMILL are introduced and related to one another. Finally, modes of practical implementation as well as possible implications for educational research and inclusive teacher education will be discussed.
Q2

School staff perspectives on using augmentative and alternative communication with students with severe or profound intellectual and multiple disabilities
Flink A.R., Wallin S., Larsson J., Westling E., Johnels J.Å.
AbstractThis mixed methods survey study aims to investigate school staff's perspectives on using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) with students with the most severe disabilities in Swedish school settings. The study employed a convergent mixed methods design, where both quantitative and qualitative data were collected and analysed in parallel and then integrated and compared in the discussion and conclusion section of the paper. The study's respondents consisted of school staff who worked with students with severe or profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (S/PIMD) in Swedish schools. Results showed that almost all staff reported using AAC with students at least half of the time. The frequency of AAC use did not seem to differ between staff with different educational backgrounds, apart from teachers/special educators appearing slightly more inclined to use AAC in planned classroom activities when compared to staff with other educational backgrounds. The results also corroborate previous research stating that collaboration between stakeholders (such as school, family and the habilitation services) is fundamental to successful AAC implementation but that there are challenges when establishing efficient collaborations between stakeholders.
Q2

Czech validation of the Attitudes to Inclusion Scale and the Intention to Teach in Inclusive Classroom Scale among primary school teachers
Pivarč J.
AbstractThe Attitudes to Inclusion Scale (AIS) and the Intention to Teach in Inclusive Classroom Scale (ITICS) are instruments widely used internationally for researching teachers' attitudes and intentions towards inclusive education (IE). This study presents information on psychometric analysis of the AIS and ITICS as well as their functioning in the Czech environment. Using a sample of 1434 teachers (88% female) from 140 regular public primary schools in the Czech Republic, confirmatory factor analysis was used to verify the two‐factor structure of the AIS, which measures beliefs and feelings, as well as the structure of the ITICS, a unidimensional construct that measures the general intention of teachers in relation to IE. Both instruments achieved high reliability (ω ≥ 0.75), and convergent, discriminant, concurrent, and criterion validity were confirmed. The partially scalar for ITICS and fully strict invariance for AIS for the compared groups of teachers in terms of their age was achieved. The AIS and ITICS scales work well in the Czech sociocultural context and can be considered valid and reliable instruments for (international) comparisons of teachers' attitudes and intentions towards IE. Limitations of the study and suggestions for future research directions are also discussed.
Q2

Does teacher behaviour matter? The relation between perceived teacher behaviour and students' adaptive error responses
Pöchmüller V.
AbstractTeachers serve as role models in dealing with errors. They play a crucial role in creating a positive error climate in the classroom. Students with emotional and behavioural disorders (EBD) make more errors during learning activity, tend to dysregulate error‐specific emotions, and are more likely to receive negative teacher feedback. In particular, externalizing behaviour problems are a risk factor for maladaptive individual error processing. Consequently, it is of significant interest to examine the students' perception of teacher behaviours in addressing errors, particularly in terms of the degree of adaptivity of individual error responses. For the first time, students with EBD attending German special schools were asked to provide their perceptions of error handling in the classroom. A total of 279 adolescents completed a questionnaire. The results of a path analysis indicate that the absence of negative teacher reactions and teacher support following errors have a significant direct effect on the adaptivity of individual error responses. The study recommends that teachers adopt positive responses and teacher support to promote students' adaptive individual error responses. In order to acquire professional error competence, teachers must develop an understanding of social–emotional competencies in children and adolescents related to error management in students with EBD.
Q2

The ultimate responsibility? The analysis of the position of special education teachers when the child is left without support in early childhood education
Heiskanen N., Saha M., Pesonen H., Viljamaa E., Poikola M., Nevala P., Karna E.
AbstractIn this paper, we investigate the discursive positionings of early childhood special education teachers (ECSETs) in situations where they describe challenges in organizing the support for a child in interprofessional collaboration. Relaying on research on occupational well‐being of teachers, we state that such situations where professionals experience insurmountable challenges in organizing proper support for a child are potentially burdensome to ECSETs. However, because of ECSETs unique and ambivalent role as part of inclusive early childhood education and care (ECEC) system in Finland, they are in a particular risk to get burdened by the increasing demands of coordinating and organizing support. In the study, we utilized the writings of 55 ECSETs, collected using empathy‐based method and analysed them with position analysis methodology to investigate how ECSETs position themselves in such challenging situations. As a result, we show how ECSETs positions include (1) reflective controller of coping, (2) burdened support organizer, and (3) self‐blaming survivor. As a conclusion, we illustrate that while ECSETs hold no official or managerial positions in ECEC community, they strongly position themselves as the ones ultimately responsible for supporting the child but also other ECEC professionals, as well as maintaining their own wellbeing and coping in difficult situations.
Top-100
Citing journals
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
|
Evaluation Review
1137 citations, 3.96%
|
|
Evaluation and Program Planning
542 citations, 1.89%
|
|
American Journal of Evaluation
371 citations, 1.29%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
271 citations, 0.94%
|
|
Journal of Experimental Criminology
181 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
179 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Prevention Science
173 citations, 0.6%
|
|
PLoS ONE
173 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
168 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness
164 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Substance Use and Misuse
163 citations, 0.57%
|
|
New Directions for Program Evaluation
155 citations, 0.54%
|
|
American Journal of Public Health
147 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Children and Youth Services Review
142 citations, 0.49%
|
|
New Directions for Evaluation
130 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Evaluation
129 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Addictive Behaviors
128 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Addiction
115 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Crime and Delinquency
105 citations, 0.37%
|
|
American Journal of Community Psychology
105 citations, 0.37%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
103 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Journal of School Health
103 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
99 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Drug Issues
98 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Social Science and Medicine
96 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Evaluation and the Health Professions
93 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Multivariate Behavioral Research
91 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Sustainability
90 citations, 0.31%
|
|
BMC Public Health
88 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research
87 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Criminology and Public Policy
87 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
85 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Statistics in Medicine
85 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
85 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Experimental Education
85 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Campbell Systematic Reviews
83 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Justice Quarterly
82 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Drug Education
79 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
76 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Criminal Justice
73 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Evaluation Practice
73 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
71 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Community Psychology
69 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Preventive Medicine
66 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Health Education and Behavior
65 citations, 0.23%
|
|
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
64 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Quantitative Criminology
64 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Adolescent Health
62 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Studies in Educational Evaluation
61 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Research on Social Work Practice
59 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
58 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Child Abuse and Neglect
55 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Early Childhood Research Quarterly
55 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
53 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Drug Policy
52 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Scientometrics
52 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
51 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Drug and Alcohol Review
51 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Structural Equation Modeling
51 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Violence Against Women
50 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
49 citations, 0.17%
|
|
BMJ Open
48 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Primary Prevention
47 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Criminal Justice and Behavior
47 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
46 citations, 0.16%
|
|
BMC Medical Research Methodology
45 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Police Quarterly
45 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Policing
44 citations, 0.15%
|
|
AIDS and Behavior
43 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Criminology
41 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Accident Analysis and Prevention
40 citations, 0.14%
|
|
BMC Health Services Research
37 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of School Psychology
37 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Behavior Research Methods
37 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
36 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
36 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Substance Abuse: Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
35 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Behavioral Scientist
35 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
33 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Health Promotion Practice
33 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Qualitative Health Research
33 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Educational and Psychological Measurement
33 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Prison Journal
33 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Environment, Development and Sustainability
33 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Educational Researcher
32 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Policy Studies Journal
32 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
32 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
32 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Criminal Justice Policy Review
31 citations, 0.11%
|
|
American Journal of Criminal Justice
31 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
30 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Social Service Research
30 citations, 0.1%
|
|
SAGE Open
30 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
30 citations, 0.1%
|
|
American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse
29 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy
29 citations, 0.1%
|
|
American Journal of Epidemiology
29 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Management
29 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Addiction Research and Theory
29 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of the American Statistical Association
28 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
|
|
SAGE
4968 citations, 17.31%
|
|
Elsevier
4745 citations, 16.53%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
3711 citations, 12.93%
|
|
Springer Nature
3609 citations, 12.57%
|
|
Wiley
3561 citations, 12.41%
|
|
Emerald
594 citations, 2.07%
|
|
Oxford University Press
562 citations, 1.96%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
472 citations, 1.64%
|
|
MDPI
439 citations, 1.53%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
429 citations, 1.49%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
275 citations, 0.96%
|
|
American Educational Research Association
249 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
242 citations, 0.84%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
216 citations, 0.75%
|
|
BMJ
211 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
206 citations, 0.72%
|
|
American Public Health Association
161 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Annual Reviews
119 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
116 citations, 0.4%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
113 citations, 0.39%
|
|
IGI Global
113 citations, 0.39%
|
|
JMIR Publications
91 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
60 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
55 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
48 citations, 0.17%
|
|
SciELO
46 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
40 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Institute of Mathematical Statistics
35 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
34 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
33 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
32 citations, 0.11%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
31 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
31 citations, 0.11%
|
|
American Economic Association
27 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Springer Publishing Company
26 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
25 citations, 0.09%
|
|
MIT Press
23 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Academy of Management
23 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
22 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Guilford Publications
21 citations, 0.07%
|
|
S. Karger AG
19 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
19 citations, 0.07%
|
|
CAIRN
17 citations, 0.06%
|
|
World Scientific
16 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
16 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Psychiatric Association Publishing
16 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy
15 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
14 citations, 0.05%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
14 citations, 0.05%
|
|
IOS Press
13 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
13 citations, 0.05%
|
|
National Association of School Psychologists
13 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Health Affairs (Project Hope)
12 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Cornell University Press
11 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Royal College of Psychiatrists
11 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Environmental Health Perspectives
11 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society for Nutrition
10 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Joint Commission Resources Inc.
10 citations, 0.03%
|
|
OpenEdition
10 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Human Kinetics
10 citations, 0.03%
|
|
IWA Publishing
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
IOP Publishing
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
N T C Publications Ltd.
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
CMA Impact Inc.
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
SLACK
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Accounting Association
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Max-Planck Institute for Demographic Research/Max-Planck-institut fur Demografische Forschung
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
AOSIS
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Marketing Association
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Speech Language Hearing Association
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Societe Francaise de Sante Publique
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Medknow
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Bristol University Press
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Duke University Press
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Cognizant, LLC
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
EDP Sciences
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Royal Society
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Early Childhood Australia
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Canadian Evaluation Society
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Johann Ambrosius Barth
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
U.S. Agency for International Development
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
F1000 Research
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Dialectical Publishing
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Massachusetts Medical Society
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Society for Neuroscience
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB)
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
53 publications, 3.61%
|
|
Northwestern University
32 publications, 2.18%
|
|
Harvard University
29 publications, 1.97%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
28 publications, 1.91%
|
|
University of Minnesota
27 publications, 1.84%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
24 publications, 1.63%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
22 publications, 1.5%
|
|
University of Washington
22 publications, 1.5%
|
|
University of Michigan
22 publications, 1.5%
|
|
Florida State University
20 publications, 1.36%
|
|
Arizona State University
20 publications, 1.36%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
20 publications, 1.36%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
20 publications, 1.36%
|
|
University of Southern California
19 publications, 1.29%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
19 publications, 1.29%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
19 publications, 1.29%
|
|
Cornell University
17 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
17 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
17 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Tulane University
17 publications, 1.16%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
17 publications, 1.16%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
16 publications, 1.09%
|
|
University of Chicago
16 publications, 1.09%
|
|
Michigan State University
13 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Columbia University
13 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Miami
13 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Florida
13 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
13 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Temple University
12 publications, 0.82%
|
|
George Washington University
11 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Stanford University
10 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Georgia State University
10 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Virginia Tech
9 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Duke University
9 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Syracuse University
9 publications, 0.61%
|
|
San Diego State University
9 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of South Florida
9 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
9 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore County
9 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Cincinnati
9 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Arizona
8 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
8 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Wayne State University
8 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Brown University
8 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Memphis
8 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
7 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Yale University
7 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Haifa
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Queensland
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
American University
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Central Florida
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Western Michigan University
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Medical College of Wisconsin
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Kentucky
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Denver
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
North Carolina State University
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
New York University
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Northern Illinois University
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
DePaul University
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of California, Merced
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Southern Illinois University Carbondale
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Florida International University
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Florida Atlantic University
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Louisville
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Louisiana State University
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Colorado Colorado Springs
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Cambridge
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Padua
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Eastern Piedmont Amadeo Avogadro
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Georgetown University
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Boston University
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Princeton University
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Auburn University
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Ohio State University
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Simon Fraser University
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Queen's University at Kingston
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Murcia
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Castilla-La Mancha
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Rhode Island
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Nebraska at Omaha
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
National Cancer Institute
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
National Institute of Mental Health
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Gaziantep University
3 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
3 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Istanbul Commerce University
3 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Uppsala University
3 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Linnaeus University
3 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Southwest Jiaotong University
3 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Anhui University of Finance and Economics
3 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
|
|
Harvard University
5 publications, 2.98%
|
|
University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City
4 publications, 2.38%
|
|
University of Castilla-La Mancha
4 publications, 2.38%
|
|
Gaziantep University
3 publications, 1.79%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
3 publications, 1.79%
|
|
Istanbul Commerce University
3 publications, 1.79%
|
|
University of Padua
3 publications, 1.79%
|
|
Florida State University
3 publications, 1.79%
|
|
Southwest Jiaotong University
3 publications, 1.79%
|
|
Anhui University of Finance and Economics
3 publications, 1.79%
|
|
University of Eastern Piedmont Amadeo Avogadro
3 publications, 1.79%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
3 publications, 1.79%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
3 publications, 1.79%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
3 publications, 1.79%
|
|
University of Murcia
3 publications, 1.79%
|
|
Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University
2 publications, 1.19%
|
|
University of Lahore
2 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Erciyes University
2 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Cukurova University
2 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Vietnam National University, Hanoi
2 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
2 publications, 1.19%
|
|
American University of Beirut
2 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Lebanese American University
2 publications, 1.19%
|
|
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
2 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Shandong University of Technology
2 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Stanford University
2 publications, 1.19%
|
|
George Washington University
2 publications, 1.19%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
2 publications, 1.19%
|
|
University of Chicago
2 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Hainan University
2 publications, 1.19%
|
|
University of Michigan
2 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Brown University
2 publications, 1.19%
|
|
University of Florida
2 publications, 1.19%
|
|
University of Delaware
2 publications, 1.19%
|
|
North South University
2 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Daffodil International University
2 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Islamic University of Technology
2 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Ural Federal University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
King Abdulaziz University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
University of Jeddah
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
University of Sharjah
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Ege University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
University of Delhi
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
COMSATS University Islamabad
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Abdul Wali Khan University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Hasan Kalyoncu University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Riphah International University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Selcuk University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Istanbul Gelisim University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
University of Karachi
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Suleyman Demirel University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
KTO Karatay University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Erzincan Binali Yildirim University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
RMIT Vietnam
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
VNU University of Science
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
National Economics University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Beijing Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Tsinghua University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
South China University of Technology
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Eastern Mediterranean University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Jilin University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Aksaray University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
China University of Mining and Technology
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Nisantasi University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Osmaniye Korkut Ata University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
University of Genoa
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Ghent University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
University of Science, Malaysia
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
University of Lisbon
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Uppsala University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Central South University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Sunway University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Nanjing Normal University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Nanjing University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
University of Helsinki
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Wuhan University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Nankai University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Australian National University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Dalian Maritime University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Renmin University of China
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
University of Milan
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Shandong Normal University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
University of Cambridge
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
University of Antwerp
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
University of Manchester
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Chengdu University of Technology
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Southwest Petroleum University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Drexel University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
University of Southampton
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Sichuan International Studies University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
China Medical University (Taiwan)
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
National Chung Hsing University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Anqing Normal University
1 publication, 0.6%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1
2
3
4
5
|
Publishing countries
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
|
USA
|
USA, 1051, 71.55%
USA
1051 publications, 71.55%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 35, 2.38%
Canada
35 publications, 2.38%
|
China
|
China, 33, 2.25%
China
33 publications, 2.25%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 33, 2.25%
Italy
33 publications, 2.25%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 29, 1.97%
United Kingdom
29 publications, 1.97%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 24, 1.63%
Australia
24 publications, 1.63%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 19, 1.29%
Israel
19 publications, 1.29%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 18, 1.23%
Turkey
18 publications, 1.23%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 12, 0.82%
Germany
12 publications, 0.82%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 12, 0.82%
Spain
12 publications, 0.82%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 10, 0.68%
Vietnam
10 publications, 0.68%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 10, 0.68%
Sweden
10 publications, 0.68%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 9, 0.61%
Netherlands
9 publications, 0.61%
|
France
|
France, 8, 0.54%
France
8 publications, 0.54%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 8, 0.54%
Pakistan
8 publications, 0.54%
|
India
|
India, 7, 0.48%
India
7 publications, 0.48%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 7, 0.48%
New Zealand
7 publications, 0.48%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 7, 0.48%
Republic of Korea
7 publications, 0.48%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 6, 0.41%
Bangladesh
6 publications, 0.41%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 5, 0.34%
Switzerland
5 publications, 0.34%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 4, 0.27%
Nigeria
4 publications, 0.27%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 4, 0.27%
Peru
4 publications, 0.27%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 4, 0.27%
Saudi Arabia
4 publications, 0.27%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 4, 0.27%
South Africa
4 publications, 0.27%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 3, 0.2%
Belgium
3 publications, 0.2%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 3, 0.2%
Brazil
3 publications, 0.2%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 3, 0.2%
Ghana
3 publications, 0.2%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 3, 0.2%
Indonesia
3 publications, 0.2%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 3, 0.2%
Malaysia
3 publications, 0.2%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 3, 0.2%
Norway
3 publications, 0.2%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 3, 0.2%
Philippines
3 publications, 0.2%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 3, 0.2%
Japan
3 publications, 0.2%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 2, 0.14%
Portugal
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 0.14%
Austria
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 2, 0.14%
Georgia
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 2, 0.14%
Iraq
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 0.14%
Ireland
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 2, 0.14%
Cyprus
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 2, 0.14%
Lebanon
2 publications, 0.14%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 2, 0.14%
UAE
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 0.14%
Romania
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 2, 0.14%
Finland
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.07%
Russia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Barbados
|
Barbados, 1, 0.07%
Barbados
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.07%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Guatemala
|
Guatemala, 1, 0.07%
Guatemala
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.07%
Greece
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 1, 0.07%
Egypt
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.07%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.07%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1, 0.07%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Laos
|
Laos, 1, 0.07%
Laos
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 1, 0.07%
Malawi
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.07%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.07%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.07%
Poland
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Rwanda
|
Rwanda, 1, 0.07%
Rwanda
1 publication, 0.07%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 1, 0.07%
North Macedonia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.07%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.07%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.07%
Tunisia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 1, 0.07%
Uganda
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Montenegro
|
Montenegro, 1, 0.07%
Montenegro
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.07%
Chile
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.07%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Show all (35 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
|
USA
|
USA, 74, 44.05%
USA
74 publications, 44.05%
|
China
|
China, 29, 17.26%
China
29 publications, 17.26%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 16, 9.52%
Turkey
16 publications, 9.52%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 10, 5.95%
Vietnam
10 publications, 5.95%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 9, 5.36%
United Kingdom
9 publications, 5.36%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 9, 5.36%
Italy
9 publications, 5.36%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 7, 4.17%
Pakistan
7 publications, 4.17%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 6, 3.57%
Bangladesh
6 publications, 3.57%
|
India
|
India, 6, 3.57%
India
6 publications, 3.57%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 6, 3.57%
Spain
6 publications, 3.57%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 4, 2.38%
Australia
4 publications, 2.38%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 4, 2.38%
Saudi Arabia
4 publications, 2.38%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 3, 1.79%
Germany
3 publications, 1.79%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 3, 1.79%
Brazil
3 publications, 1.79%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 3, 1.79%
Nigeria
3 publications, 1.79%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 3, 1.79%
Republic of Korea
3 publications, 1.79%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 2, 1.19%
Portugal
2 publications, 1.19%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 2, 1.19%
Ghana
2 publications, 1.19%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 2, 1.19%
Canada
2 publications, 1.19%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 2, 1.19%
Lebanon
2 publications, 1.19%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 2, 1.19%
Malaysia
2 publications, 1.19%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 2, 1.19%
New Zealand
2 publications, 1.19%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 2, 1.19%
UAE
2 publications, 1.19%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 1.19%
Romania
2 publications, 1.19%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.6%
Russia
1 publication, 0.6%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.6%
Belgium
1 publication, 0.6%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.6%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.6%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.6%
Greece
1 publication, 0.6%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.6%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.6%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.6%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.6%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.6%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.6%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.6%
Cyprus
1 publication, 0.6%
|
Laos
|
Laos, 1, 0.6%
Laos
1 publication, 0.6%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.6%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.6%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 1, 0.6%
Netherlands
1 publication, 0.6%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.6%
Poland
1 publication, 0.6%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 1, 0.6%
North Macedonia
1 publication, 0.6%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.6%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.6%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.6%
Tunisia
1 publication, 0.6%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 1, 0.6%
Uganda
1 publication, 0.6%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.6%
Finland
1 publication, 0.6%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 1, 0.6%
Switzerland
1 publication, 0.6%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 1, 0.6%
Sweden
1 publication, 0.6%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.6%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.6%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 1, 0.6%
Japan
1 publication, 0.6%
|
Show all (15 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|