Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q3
Impact factor
1.9
SJR
0.851
CiteScore
4.3
Categories
Communication
Strategy and Management
Areas
Business, Management and Accounting
Social Sciences
Years of issue
1987-2025
journal names
Management Communication Quarterly
MANAGE COMMUN Q
Top-3 citing journals

Management Communication Quarterly
(2217 citations)

Public Relations Review
(625 citations)

Journal of Applied Communication Research
(513 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Arizona State University
(82 publications)

Purdue University
(50 publications)

University of Colorado Boulder
(46 publications)

University of California, Santa Barbara
(11 publications)

Arizona State University
(10 publications)

University of South Florida
(10 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 967
Q3

The brain-boosting power of exergames in neurological disabilities
Prosperini L., Pezzella F.R., Quartuccio M.E., Alcamisi I., Cruciani A., Ruggieri S.
Purpose of the research We propose a framework on how to implement exergames in the rehabilitation process. Major findings An increasing body of research is showing that exergames improve balance, motor dexterity, and cognitive functions. People suffering from stroke, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, dementia, and many other neurological conditions may benefit from exergames. Similar to other rehabilitation strategies, playing exergames enhances neuroplasticity and facilitates functional recovery in individuals with neurological disabilities. Alongside pharmacological treatments, rehabilitation interventions, including exergames, are essential in neurological diseases to achieve functional restoration, promote independence, enhance quality of life, and prevent secondary complications. Conclusions Exergames are an emerging tool in the field of digital rehabilitation. They provide fun, engaging, and effective interventions for adaptive physical and cognitive training. The integration of exergames into a comprehensive neurorehabilitation program has stepped up considerably following the first COVID-19 pandemic wave that led to widespread disruptions in healthcare systems.
Q3

Exploring the possibilities of using assistive technology for people with multiple sclerosis
Slavković S., Ćeranić I., Desideri L.
Background Assistive Technology (AT) helps individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) to overcome limitations and enhance their social engagement by providing support in areas that would otherwise be difficult or unachievable. Objective The aim of this study is to determine the level of AT usage among individuals with MS and to address various questions related to the sociological implications of (non)use of AT devices, (un)awareness, and logistical barriers that prevent the full utilization of AT devices in the daily activities. Method 121 participants with previously diagnosed MS (26 AT users, 95 non-users), aged 18–65, were surveyed using a modified The Rapid Assistive Technology Assessment tool (rATA) covering: demographics, needs, supply, financing, satisfaction, and recommendations. Results Totally 21.5% of MS individuals used AT, dominantly mobility devices. Insecurity prevents desirable usage of AT devices. Affordability is a factor relevant for the device ownership. Both MS individuals and society lacked sufficient AT informedness. Conclusion Based on the results and current guidelines, it’s essential to improve policies, supplying, AT device enhancements, and education to fully utilize AT’s potential in people with MS.
Q3

Functional activity and mobility: A new technology-aided program to support people with intellectual and visual disabilities
Lancioni G.E., Alberti G., Pezzuoli F., Olivieri A., Singh N.N., O’Reilly M.F., Sigafoos J., Desideri L.
Background People with intellectual disability and severe visual impairment or blindness tend to have low levels of functional activity engagement and low levels of mobility/ambulation. Objective The study assessed a new technology-aided program to support four adults with intellectual disability and blindness in their activity and mobility engagement. Methods The program was implemented following single-case research methodology. The activity consisted of completing object kits. The objects needed for the kits were distributed over a relatively large space and the participants moved around that space to collect them and distribute them in the kits. The program (a) was based on the use of a smartphone, tags with radio frequency identification codes, and a tag reader linked to the smartphone, and (b) ensured that the participants would receive physical support, verbal instructions, and preferred stimulation. Results During the baseline phase (without the program), the participants were unable to engage in activity and mobility. During the intervention (using the program), all participants managed to engage in activity and mobility correctly completing the object kits available during the sessions. Conclusions The results suggest that the program might be useful to support activity and mobility in people like the participants of this study.
Q3

Assistive technology provision at mainstream schools—Experiences of Serbian resource centers
Glumbić N., Đorđević M., Slavković S., Schembri S.B., Agius M., Magni R., Mavrou K., Theodorou E., Mouka M., Hoogerwerf E., Desideri L.
Background Over the last 15 years, inclusive education has been formally established in Serbia as a mandatory approach for all students, ensuring equal rights and access to education without discrimination on any grounds. In addition to mainstream schools, Serbia also has special schools for students with developmental challenges and disabilities. Although some special schools in Serbia have been functioning as resource centers (RCs) for a long time now, 13 RCs have only recently been officially established, aiming to support inclusive education through assistive technology (AT) among other things. Objective The research reported in this study was conducted within a project that aims to address challenges in implementing and improving inclusive education in the Republic of Serbia, focusing on the existing capacities and difficulties in how RCs provide AT services to mainstream schools to offer a set of recommendations to inform the development of RCs in the country. Method A SWOT analysis involving 80 respondents was conducted. Fifty-three respondents completed a questionnaire online, while further 27 respondents participated in five focus groups. Groups involved experts working in the RCs, suppliers and manufacturers of AT, parents of persons with disabilities, and expert associates from mainstream schools. The data was analyzed using a SWOT framework. Results The respondents reported that human capacities (e.g., motivation and experience) were the main strength. Weaknesses included lack of specific and modern knowledge about working with children with different conditions, as well as specific knowledge about the AT itself. Intersectoral cooperation was pointed out as the main opportunity, while obstacles were recognized in almost all work segments (lack of finances, lack of staff, lack of adequate legal regulations and communication and cooperation). Conclusion Based on the results achieved, potential solutions for overcoming the existing obstacles in resource centers were proposed.
Q3

Empowering impaired learners: Technological advancements in higher education
Sharma S., Dureja S., Saini D., Jose R., Pant R., Singh A.
Background Sensory impairments, such as visual impairment, deafblindness, deaf or hard of hearing (DHH), muteness, and Sensory Processing Disorder, present significant challenges for students in higher education. These challenges include difficulties in accessing information, participating in discussions, and adapting to academic environments. Objective This review aims to explore advancements in assistive technology that support sensory-impaired individuals in higher education and identify existing gaps in accessibility, usability, and educator preparedness, aligning with (UNSDG) (United Nations Sustainable Development Goals) 4’s goal of inclusive lifelong education by 2030. Methods We conducted a systematic literature review of 68 studies focussing on technological solutions such as assistive devices, adaptive learning platforms, and communication tools designed to enhance accessibility and inclusion in academic settings. Results While various assistive technologies have improved access, disparities in resource availability across institutions persist. Many educators lack adequate training to effectively integrate these technologies, and infrastructure limitations further hinder their use. Conclusions The findings underscore the need for further research to address accessibility gaps and improve educator training. By enhancing the adoption of assistive technologies, higher education institutions can create more inclusive learning environments, ensuring equal opportunities for all students, regardless of sensory impairments.
Q3

Timed motor function test using video-based observation and online-based observation methods among typically developing children: A reliability and validity study
Kumar A., Samuel A.J.
Objectives This study evaluated intra-rater (IR), test-retest reliability (TR), and concurrent validity of 10-m walk test (10mWT), a timed motor function test (TMFT) using video- (VBO) and online-based (OBO) observation with direct observation (DO). Methods Seventy five (n = 75) middle school going typically developing children performed repeated sessions of 10mWT to determine validity and reliability of VBO and OBO with DO. IR and TR reliability were calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The correlation between sessions of VBO, OBO methods, and DO method were evaluated to estimate the concurrent validity. Results Good IR and TR reliability of VBO and OBO methods were observed (IR: ICC = 0.90 [VBO], 0.78 [OBO]; TR: 0.84 [VBO], 0.85 [OBO]). Correlations between VBO (rs = 0.86; p<0.001) and OBO (rs = 0.85; p<0.001) methods with DO method demonstrated good concurrent validity. Conclusions VBO and OBO methods can be used in clinical settings where DO method is not feasible.
Q3

Users’ and therapists’ perspectives on the design of extended reality environments to train prosthesis control: A narrative review and focus group
Rozevink S., Murgia A., Bongers R., van der Sluis C.
Background Extended reality (XR) has previously been used to train control of upper limb prostheses. It is however unclear what characteristics an XR environment should have in order to become a usable and effective training tool. Objective The objective was to develop a framework describing the most important factors to be incorporated when designing an XR environment to train prosthesis control. Methods A mixed method approach was used. A narrative review was conducted to explore factors that should be considered when designing an XR environment for prosthesis control. Subsequently, a preliminary framework, based on these factors, was rated by prosthesis users and therapists and discussed during focus groups. Results Fifty out of 489 articles were included. The preliminary framework comprised 62 factors in four domains: feedback, control, exercise and environment. Five prosthesis users and eight therapists participated in three focus groups. A final framework was developed which contained 46 factors in the four domains. End-users considered all domains to be equally important, since domains and factors influence each other. Conclusions The developed framework can be used to guide the design of an XR environment to train prosthesis control.
Q3

Adjusting data input speed in a human-computer interface system controlled by eye gaze and electroencephalography data
Ngo T.D., Nguyen L.T., Le T.H.
Background The eye-tracking-based communication systems open up opportunities for interaction in the lives of many patients with severe motor impairments. In these systems, users need to focus their gaze on a key until it is fully entered. However, these systems are not truly refined in terms of design and interaction efficiency, and they may still cause discomfort for users, such as eye strain or typing errors. Some solutions have been proposed to address this issue, but so far, no comprehensive solution has been found. Objective In this research, we have proposed a novel method to adjust data inputting speed in human-computer interfaces controlled by eye gaze and electroencephalography (EEG) data. Methods It combines EEG data to extract the user’s attention level. We then flexibly adjust the time users need to keep their gaze on a key on the system and personalize the user experience using their own data. This approach aims to enhance interaction efficiency by increasing interaction speed while maintaining accuracy. We evaluated this method on an eye-tracking-based spelling communication system for Vietnamese people, proposed by our team, involving 20 healthy individuals and 4 people with motor function impairments. Results The results indicated that communication speed through the system increased by 20–80% for participants, and not only did the time improve, but the communication effectiveness also increased linearly. This outcome was achieved for both healthy individuals and patients. Conclusions Through experimentation, we have demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of our approach, showing improvements in typing speed over successive trials. This result is highly meaningful as it optimizes dwell time and interaction efficiency in the ET-based system without having to compromise by increasing the error rate when directly reducing dwell time.
Q3

Skill transfer of upper limb prosthesis control after training in a virtual reality environment
Maas B., Tchimino J., van Dijk B., Murgia A., van der Sluis C.K., Bongers R.M.
Background Controlling a myoelectric arm prosthesis after amputation is a skill that is difficult to master and requires extensive training since muscles need to be activated in a specific manner. One novel type of training places the prosthesis user in a virtual reality environment (VRE) to train; however, it is not yet clear if skill transfer occurs from the training to actual prosthesis use. Objective The aim of the current study is to examine skill transfer of VRE training. Methods A total of 20 able-bodied participants were divided into two training groups. One group trained with a newly developed VRE system and the other trained using a prosthesis simulator. Both groups performed five training sessions in a pre-test/post-test design where functional control, motivation and perceived workload were measured. Results The results showed that both groups improved from pre-test to post-test on functional control and motivation but not on the workload. Interestingly, almost no differences in improvements between groups were found indicating that there was no difference in effectiveness between training methods. Conclusion Based on these results, we can conclude that we found skill transfer of VRE training. Therefore, VRE training is an effective training method for arm prosthesis control and has valuable potential for implementation in a rehabilitation setting.
Q3

Smartphone-assisted Language Training (SaLT) in Aphasia: Insights from the design and development of a multilingual smartphone application
Shenoy R., Nickels L., Krishnan G.
Background Technology-based aphasia rehabilitation has witnessed steep growth over the past decades with the availability of several commercial apps. While such apps facilitate the intensity of rehabilitation, certain limitations including low multi-language capabilities and/or task-customization (for client-specific needs) result in lower uptake in multilingual countries like India. Aim We describe the development and pilot-testing of the Smartphone- assisted Language Training (SaLT) app – a new application for both mono- and multilingual people with aphasia that facilitates cross-lingual and cross-national sharing of intervention resources. Methods SaLT is a novel, clinician-prescribed, android-based therapy application for mono- and multilingual people with aphasia (SaLT-Home). It can be personalized and customized for individual clients through the clinician-operated web application (SaLT-SLP). Further, it permits asynchronous remote monitoring of therapy progress and sharing of therapy resources with other clinicians across the globe. We present details of the development and structure of the app. We also present pilot testing with four multilingual people with aphasia who undertook clinician-delivered therapy and SaLT-based home therapy. The clinician uploaded personalized tasks and training materials for practice into the SaLT app. Participants with aphasia and their caregivers were asked to practice tasks at home. The focus of this study was not on effectiveness but rather on usage and feasibility. We collected both quantitative and qualitative data regarding the use of the app. After the intervention, participants rated the user experience using the User Mobile Rating Scale. Outcomes & Results Three of the four participants with aphasia across two different languages were motivated to practice and used SaLT-Home. These participants were generally positive about the app. They provided useful insights regarding training in the use of app-delivered therapy, the transition to independent use of such apps and need for support during practice. Conclusions The SaLT application, with its customization and multi-language capabilities, hopes to redefine technology-based intervention in aphasia. Further, it provides the scope for collating and sharing therapy resources by clinicians around the world which could foster the rehabilitation of aphasia, globally. The data from pilot testing also provide insights into the prescription and use of mobile-based home therapy applications which is of general applicability to app-based therapy. The results of this study suggest that future exploration of the use of SaLT is warranted in experimentally controlled treatment studies.
Q3

Empowering accessibility: The dynamics of assistive technology acquisition
Eshleman J., Moon N., Harris F., Linden M.
BACKGROUND While it has been broadly agreed that there is a need for consolidated information about assistive technology, previous attempts have not been sufficient for detailed consumer demands. OBJECTIVE Researchers sought consumer feedback to determine what should be included in a comprehensive, accessible database of AT. METHODS We conducted focus groups with different stakeholder groups (people with diverse disabilities, practitioners, and circles of support). We used a framework analysis to map participant responses to the research questions using focus group transcripts and notes. RESULTS AT users are looking for quick access to certain information such as the cost versus benefit, reliability, funding, and compatibility. They expect to find this in a variety of formats (video, audio, text) with a collaborative element (reviews and recommendations) from other users. CONCLUSIONS In an AT product database, users want the option to search by activity rather than only disability category, as disability can fluctuate. Accessibility of the database is key, with people preferring modifiable and flexible formats for both adding and consuming information. A community of practice will foster the connections people require to confirm their decisions prior to purchase.
Q3

Using heart rate monitoring to discover pain and discomfort in non-verbal persons with severe intellectual disability: Caregivers’ experiences
Boysen E.S., Øderud T., Strisland F., Kildal E.S., Dahl I., Hassel B., Morland C.
BACKGROUND Non-verbal persons with intellectual disabilities (ID) may suffer from pain or discomfort, but caregivers may not notice this because of the communication difficulties. Previously, we conducted a study in which professional caregivers used heart rate (HR) monitoring to identify situations that cause acute pain or distress in the everyday life of non-verbal persons with ID. OBJECTIVE To explore professional caregivers’ experience with using HR monitors to better understand non-verbal persons with ID. METHODS Fifteen professional caregivers and 30 final-year students of social education were recruited as informants based on their experience with HR monitoring in non-verbal persons. The informants were interviewed, and they responded to a questionnaire with open-ended questions. The qualitative data were analysed thematically. RESULTS Caregivers reported that HR monitoring provided information about acute pain, acute or prolonged distress, occurrence of epileptic seizures, and the non-verbal persons’ preferences and dislikes. HR data had to be interpreted contextually to be meaningful. Some informants found HR monitoring time-consuming or the interpretation of HR data challenging due to multiple possible causes of increased HR. CONCLUSIONS Caregivers experience HR monitoring as a potentially important source of information that may help them better understand non-verbal persons with ID.
Q3

Impact of central vision loss on oculomotor skills required for reading: An eye-tracking study
González-Vides L., Gómez-Pedrero J.A., Cañadas P., Hernández-Verdejo J.L.
BACKGROUND A better understanding of the relationship between eye movements required for reading and central visual field loss may facilitate the design of more effective personalized visual rehabilitation programs to improve access to information and quality of life. OBJECTIVE To determine the impact of central vision loss due to maculopathy on the oculomotor skills required for reading and tasks of varying complexity, eye-tracking technology was used. METHODS Case-control study. Participants were 17 cases (61.7 years (SD [Formula: see text] 8.8), 12 females and 5 males) and 17 controls, matched for age and sex. Three computer-based tests were administered, analyzing eye fixations, saccadic movements, and visual search, measured with a 60 Hz eye-tracking device. RESULTS Central vision loss due to maculopathy increases the number of fixations and saccadic movements, indicating more instability in and out of the region of interest. Visual search required more fixations (16.2 [Formula: see text] 10.2 vs. 6.7 [Formula: see text] 1.9), more saccades (11.7 [Formula: see text] 6.4 vs. 3.3 [Formula: see text] 1.9), longer latency (701.3 [Formula: see text] 191.4 ms vs. 315.9 [Formula: see text] 56.0 ms), and longer time to find the target (113.1 [Formula: see text] 76.6 s vs. 18.5 [Formula: see text] 10.1 s). All comparisons between the two groups showed a statistically significant difference ([Formula: see text] 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The results revealed the significant impact of central vision loss due to maculopathy on reading by increasing patterns of eye fixations, saccadic movements, and visual search strategies, as measured by eye-tracking technology. This technology may have high potential to improve the assessment and rehabilitation of people with maculopathy, and this may become key information for designing personalized interventions to improve the quality of life and autonomy of individuals with central vision loss.
Q3

Design of health technologies for users facing limitations: A scoping review
König-Klever E., Bohn P.R., Libânio C.D., Fogliatto F.S., Tonetto L.M.
BACKGROUND Studies reveal healthcare disparities for people with disabilities (PwD) due to various barriers. Digital health offers promise but raises concerns about the digital divide. To address that, health Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) should follow inclusive design principles for accessibility to all, including PwD. OBJECTIVE We examine the design of ICTs in healthcare to address the needs of people with disabilities. Three research questions guide the study: (i) how health technologies contribute to healthcare accessibility and inclusion; (ii) what the main challenges are in implementing these technologies; (iii) how health ICTs are structured to meet users’ limitations and enhance performance. METHODS Research questions are addressed through a scoping review and critical literature analysis, drawing from seven databases and grey literature. The analysis of research question (iii) uses the accessibility fundamentals recommended by the Web Accessibility Initiative as starting point. RESULTS Our research reveals a predominant focus on the elderly, with cognitive impairment as the most studied limitation, followed by mobility, reach and dexterity, vision, and hearing. CONCLUSIONS We emphasize the need for inclusive design for all health technologies and investigate their potential to improve user and healthcare system performance. We also propose four promising research directions for further investigation.
Q3

Experiences of using an exoskeleton by care professionals in elderly care: A descriptive qualitative study
Roentgen U., Lexis M., Roost F., Daniëls R.
BACKGROUND Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are common among care professionals in elderly care. Exoskeletons showed effectiveness in preventing and reducing low back pain in other sectors. However, the potential of using an exoskeleton in elderly care is unclear. OBJECTIVE To document the experiences of care professionals using an exoskeleton in elderly care. METHODS A descriptive qualitative study with individual semi-structured interviews among professionals from two elderly care institutes, facing low back pain. RESULTS Twenty-two care professionals used the exoskeleton mainly at peak loads during morning and evening care. Their experiences were described in four main themes: wearing and adjusting, movement and comfort, appearance, integration into work, and perceived effects. Those who experienced (predominantly) positive effects reported having less or even no back pain, partly due to the relief of the lower back, but also to a more conscious posture and attention to ergonomically sound movement. CONCLUSIONS This study led to valuable insights into experiences of using an exoskeleton in elderly care, such as the potential of mitigating and preventing low back pain, and suggestions for further development of exoskeletons to improve their usability in the context of elderly care. The latter should be followed by studies into long-term effects.
Top-100
Citing journals
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
|
Management Communication Quarterly
2217 citations, 7.9%
|
|
Public Relations Review
625 citations, 2.23%
|
|
Journal of Applied Communication Research
513 citations, 1.83%
|
|
Human Relations
418 citations, 1.49%
|
|
Corporate Communications
369 citations, 1.32%
|
|
International Journal of Business Communication
369 citations, 1.32%
|
|
Communication Studies
321 citations, 1.14%
|
|
Western Journal of Communication
299 citations, 1.07%
|
|
Communication Monographs
295 citations, 1.05%
|
|
Organization Studies
293 citations, 1.04%
|
|
Organization
243 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Journal of Business Ethics
240 citations, 0.86%
|
|
Journal of Public Relations Research
229 citations, 0.82%
|
|
Communication Theory
220 citations, 0.78%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
206 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Sustainability
190 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Journal of Communication Management
179 citations, 0.64%
|
|
Annals of the International Communication Association
173 citations, 0.62%
|
|
International Journal of Strategic Communication
170 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Communication Quarterly
155 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Leadership
150 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Communication Research Reports
144 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Health Communication
135 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
127 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Academy of Management Review
121 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Communication Research
121 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management
120 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Public Relations Inquiry
117 citations, 0.42%
|
|
International Journal of Conflict Management
110 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Human Communication Research
106 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Gender, Work and Organization
105 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Communication Education
103 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Management Learning
102 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Computers in Human Behavior
94 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Management Studies
93 citations, 0.33%
|
|
The Southern Communication Journal
92 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Handbook of Research on Global Business Opportunities
92 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Culture and Organization
91 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Academy of Management Annals
91 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of Organizational Change Management
87 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Leadership Quarterly
87 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Journal of Business Research
85 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Management and Organization
84 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
82 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Management Inquiry
78 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Scandinavian Journal of Management
75 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Communication Reports
74 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Academy of Management Journal
70 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Women's Studies in Communication
69 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Small Group Research
68 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Organization Science
67 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Communication
64 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management
64 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Corporate Reputation Review
63 citations, 0.22%
|
|
International Journal of Human Resource Management
61 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Leadership and Organization Development Journal
59 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Management
56 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Professions and Organization
56 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Personnel Review
55 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Business and Society
55 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Advances in Human Resources Management and Organizational Development
55 citations, 0.2%
|
|
International Journal of Management Reviews
52 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
51 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal
50 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Communication Research and Practice
48 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Management Decision
48 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Intercultural Communication Research
48 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Voluntas
48 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Organizing at the Margins
48 citations, 0.17%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
45 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of International and Intercultural Communication
44 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
43 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Concepts, Approaches and Methods
42 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Organizational Behavior
41 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Journal of Hospitality Management
40 citations, 0.14%
|
|
SAGE Open
40 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Group and Organization Management
40 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Atlantic Journal of Communication
39 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Communication and Sport
38 citations, 0.14%
|
|
New Media and Society
37 citations, 0.13%
|
|
British Journal of Management
37 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Behavioral Sciences
37 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion
36 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Discourse and Communication
36 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Managerial Psychology
36 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Human Resource Management Review
35 citations, 0.12%
|
|
International Journal of Organizational Analysis
35 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Information Technology and People
34 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Work, Employment and Society
34 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Psychological Reports
34 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Family Communication
34 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Marketing Communications
34 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Current Psychology
33 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Social Responsibility Journal
33 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Change Management
31 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Academy of Management Learning and Education
31 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Human Resource Management
30 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Management Development
30 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Negotiation and Conflict Management Research
29 citations, 0.1%
|
|
European Journal of Marketing
28 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
Citing publishers
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
|
|
SAGE
6132 citations, 21.86%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
5628 citations, 20.06%
|
|
Wiley
3061 citations, 10.91%
|
|
Emerald
2693 citations, 9.6%
|
|
Elsevier
2329 citations, 8.3%
|
|
Springer Nature
1570 citations, 5.6%
|
|
IGI Global
510 citations, 1.82%
|
|
MDPI
419 citations, 1.49%
|
|
Academy of Management
350 citations, 1.25%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
345 citations, 1.23%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
228 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
227 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
213 citations, 0.76%
|
|
Oxford University Press
170 citations, 0.61%
|
|
CAIRN
100 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
93 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
84 citations, 0.3%
|
|
OpenEdition
83 citations, 0.3%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
78 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
72 citations, 0.26%
|
|
SciELO
56 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Annual Reviews
50 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
43 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
36 citations, 0.13%
|
|
World Scientific
32 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
32 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Communiquer. Revue de communication sociale et publique
31 citations, 0.11%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
28 citations, 0.1%
|
|
JMIR Publications
27 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Human Kinetics
27 citations, 0.1%
|
|
AOSIS
27 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
21 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
19 citations, 0.07%
|
|
IOS Press
18 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
18 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Cornell University Press
16 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
16 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Intellect
16 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
16 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Accounting Association
15 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
14 citations, 0.05%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
14 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Communication and Social Robotics Labs
14 citations, 0.05%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
13 citations, 0.05%
|
|
IOP Publishing
12 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administracao de Empresas de Sao Paulo
12 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Pennsylvania State University Press
12 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society for Quality
11 citations, 0.04%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
11 citations, 0.04%
|
|
DMSP Research Center, Paris-Dauphine University
11 citations, 0.04%
|
|
BMJ
11 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IntechOpen
10 citations, 0.04%
|
|
EDP Sciences
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Goteborg University
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Mackenzie Presbyterian University
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Cognizant, LLC
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
University of California Press
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Lavoisier
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
N T C Publications Ltd.
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Brazilian Administration Review
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
China Science Publishing & Media
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
ASME International
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Bristol University Press
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Hans Publishers
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
International Society for Performance Improvement
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Southern Public Administration Education Foundation, Inc.
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Pluto Journals
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academic Journals
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
EPI SCP
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Escola Brasileira de Administracao Publica da Fundacao Getulio Vargas
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
IAE School of Management Montpellier University
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
CLOCKSS Archive
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
F1000 Research
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Engineering Project Organization Society
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Berghahn Books
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli Universitesi SBE Dergisi
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Duke University Press
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Springer Publishing Company
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Association of Professional Managers in South Africa
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Fakulteta za Organizacijske Vede, Univerza v Mariboru
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
National Academic Advising Association (NACADA)
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz)
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|
|
Arizona State University
82 publications, 6.94%
|
|
Purdue University
50 publications, 4.23%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
46 publications, 3.89%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
38 publications, 3.21%
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
34 publications, 2.88%
|
|
Ohio University
27 publications, 2.28%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
23 publications, 1.95%
|
|
University of Waikato
22 publications, 1.86%
|
|
Michigan State University
21 publications, 1.78%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
21 publications, 1.78%
|
|
University of South Florida
18 publications, 1.52%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
18 publications, 1.52%
|
|
University of Cincinnati
18 publications, 1.52%
|
|
Texas A&M University
18 publications, 1.52%
|
|
Colorado State University
17 publications, 1.44%
|
|
University of Utah
17 publications, 1.44%
|
|
Copenhagen Business School
15 publications, 1.27%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
15 publications, 1.27%
|
|
University of Southern California
13 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Kentucky
13 publications, 1.1%
|
|
DePaul University
12 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
12 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
12 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Massey University
11 publications, 0.93%
|
|
University of Michigan
11 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Baylor University
10 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Northwestern University
9 publications, 0.76%
|
|
Hong Kong Baptist University
9 publications, 0.76%
|
|
Western Michigan University
9 publications, 0.76%
|
|
Marquette University
9 publications, 0.76%
|
|
University of Texas at San Antonio
9 publications, 0.76%
|
|
Illinois State University
8 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Minnesota
8 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
8 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Colorado Colorado Springs
8 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Texas State University
8 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Tennessee
8 publications, 0.68%
|
|
North Dakota State University
7 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Dalhousie University
7 publications, 0.59%
|
|
George Mason University
7 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Arizona
7 publications, 0.59%
|
|
San Diego State University
7 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Southern Methodist University
7 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Wayne State University
7 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
7 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Texas Tech University
7 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Houston
7 publications, 0.59%
|
|
National University of Singapore
6 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Queensland
6 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Syracuse University
6 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
6 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Creighton University
6 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Zurich
5 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Aarhus University
5 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Sydney
5 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Melbourne
5 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Georgetown University
5 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Auburn University
5 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Washington
5 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
5 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Miami
5 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Boise State University
5 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
5 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Alabama
5 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Texas Christian University
5 publications, 0.42%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
4 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Cornell University
4 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Iowa State University
4 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Washington State University
4 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Ohio State University
4 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Northern Illinois University
4 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Boston College
4 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Dartmouth College
4 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
4 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
4 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Temple University
4 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Brigham Young University
4 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Helsinki
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Warwick
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Jyväskylä
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Oslo
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
City, University of London
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Auckland
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Victoria University of Wellington
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Stanford University
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
American University
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Virginia Tech
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Harvard University
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of California, Davis
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Loyola Marymount University
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Northeastern University
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Metropolitan State University of Denver
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Tilburg University
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Leeds
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Parkside
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
3 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
|
University of California, Santa Barbara
11 publications, 6.51%
|
|
Arizona State University
10 publications, 5.92%
|
|
University of South Florida
10 publications, 5.92%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
9 publications, 5.33%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
8 publications, 4.73%
|
|
Colorado State University
7 publications, 4.14%
|
|
Copenhagen Business School
6 publications, 3.55%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
5 publications, 2.96%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
5 publications, 2.96%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
5 publications, 2.96%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
5 publications, 2.96%
|
|
Massey University
4 publications, 2.37%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
4 publications, 2.37%
|
|
Ohio University
4 publications, 2.37%
|
|
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
4 publications, 2.37%
|
|
University of Tennessee
4 publications, 2.37%
|
|
Michigan State University
3 publications, 1.78%
|
|
Auburn University
3 publications, 1.78%
|
|
Northwestern University
3 publications, 1.78%
|
|
Hong Kong Baptist University
3 publications, 1.78%
|
|
University of Washington
3 publications, 1.78%
|
|
Marquette University
3 publications, 1.78%
|
|
University of Minnesota
3 publications, 1.78%
|
|
Baylor University
3 publications, 1.78%
|
|
University of Texas at San Antonio
3 publications, 1.78%
|
|
Texas State University
3 publications, 1.78%
|
|
University of Jyväskylä
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Roskilde University
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Cornell University
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
George Mason University
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
West Virginia University
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
DePaul University
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Michigan
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Metropolitan State University of Denver
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Purdue University
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Florida Atlantic University
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Miami
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Florida
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Kentucky
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Cincinnati
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Colorado Colorado Springs
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Colorado Denver
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Texas at Arlington
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Texas Tech University
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Texas A&M University
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Utah
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Alabama
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Huddersfield
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
King Saud University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Alagappa University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Udaipur
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Harbin Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
South China University of Technology
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Northwestern Polytechnical University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
University of Helsinki
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Università della Svizzera italiana
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Jinan University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Renmin University of China
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Hanken School of Economics
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
University of Southern California
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
National University of Singapore
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Southwest Jiaotong University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Drexel University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Yale University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
University of Glasgow
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
North Dakota State University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
University of Queensland
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Boston University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Mulawarman University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Washington State University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Yonsei University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
North Carolina State University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Clemson University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Oregon State University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Syracuse University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Kwangwoon University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Towson University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Incheon National University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Loyola Marymount University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Loyola University Chicago
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Southern Methodist University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Hunan University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
University of Central Florida
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Calvin University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Wayne State University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
University of Macau
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
|
USA
|
USA, 856, 72.42%
USA
856 publications, 72.42%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 47, 3.98%
Canada
47 publications, 3.98%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 40, 3.38%
United Kingdom
40 publications, 3.38%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 40, 3.38%
New Zealand
40 publications, 3.38%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 24, 2.03%
Denmark
24 publications, 2.03%
|
China
|
China, 20, 1.69%
China
20 publications, 1.69%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 20, 1.69%
Australia
20 publications, 1.69%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 11, 0.93%
Netherlands
11 publications, 0.93%
|
France
|
France, 10, 0.85%
France
10 publications, 0.85%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 9, 0.76%
Norway
9 publications, 0.76%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 8, 0.68%
Germany
8 publications, 0.68%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 7, 0.59%
Singapore
7 publications, 0.59%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 7, 0.59%
Finland
7 publications, 0.59%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 7, 0.59%
Switzerland
7 publications, 0.59%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 7, 0.59%
Sweden
7 publications, 0.59%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 5, 0.42%
Brazil
5 publications, 0.42%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 5, 0.42%
Republic of Korea
5 publications, 0.42%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 5, 0.42%
Philippines
5 publications, 0.42%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 3, 0.25%
Austria
3 publications, 0.25%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 3, 0.25%
UAE
3 publications, 0.25%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 2, 0.17%
Argentina
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 2, 0.17%
Belgium
2 publications, 0.17%
|
India
|
India, 2, 0.17%
India
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 2, 0.17%
Indonesia
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 2, 0.17%
Iraq
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 0.17%
Ireland
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 2, 0.17%
Spain
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 2, 0.17%
Costa Rica
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 2, 0.17%
Malaysia
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 2, 0.17%
Saudi Arabia
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 0.17%
Turkey
2 publications, 0.17%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 2, 0.17%
South Africa
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 2, 0.17%
Japan
2 publications, 0.17%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.08%
Israel
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 1, 0.08%
Italy
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.08%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.08%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.08%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.08%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.08%
Poland
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.08%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.08%
Chile
1 publication, 0.08%
|
Show all (12 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|
|
USA
|
USA, 136, 80.47%
USA
136 publications, 80.47%
|
China
|
China, 11, 6.51%
China
11 publications, 6.51%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 7, 4.14%
Denmark
7 publications, 4.14%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 7, 4.14%
Canada
7 publications, 4.14%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 6, 3.55%
United Kingdom
6 publications, 3.55%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 4, 2.37%
New Zealand
4 publications, 2.37%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 3, 1.78%
Republic of Korea
3 publications, 1.78%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 3, 1.78%
Finland
3 publications, 1.78%
|
France
|
France, 2, 1.18%
France
2 publications, 1.18%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 2, 1.18%
Brazil
2 publications, 1.18%
|
India
|
India, 2, 1.18%
India
2 publications, 1.18%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 1.18%
Ireland
2 publications, 1.18%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 2, 1.18%
Singapore
2 publications, 1.18%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 1, 0.59%
Germany
1 publication, 0.59%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 1, 0.59%
Australia
1 publication, 0.59%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.59%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.59%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 1, 0.59%
Spain
1 publication, 0.59%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 1, 0.59%
Netherlands
1 publication, 0.59%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.59%
Poland
1 publication, 0.59%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.59%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.59%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.59%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.59%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 1, 0.59%
Turkey
1 publication, 0.59%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.59%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.59%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 1, 0.59%
Switzerland
1 publication, 0.59%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 1, 0.59%
Japan
1 publication, 0.59%
|
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|
1 profile journal article
Chory Rebecca

Frostburg State University
62 publications,
1 717 citations
h-index: 25