Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
2.8
SJR
1.549
CiteScore
5.4
Categories
Communication
Areas
Social Sciences
Years of issue
2001-2025
journal names
Journalism Studies
JOURNALISM STUD
Top-3 citing journals

Journalism Studies
(3700 citations)

Journalism Practice
(2859 citations)

Journalism
(2817 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Amsterdam
(50 publications)

Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
(27 publications)

University of Vienna
(23 publications)

University of Amsterdam
(38 publications)

University of Minnesota
(19 publications)

University of Zurich
(14 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 356
Q3

How employees perceive work–family balanced HR practices: a moderated mediation analysis with psychological capital and differentiated leader–member exchange
Zhao F., Lu Y.(., Zhang P., Wang J.
PurposeWork–family balance has become one of the primary job considerations in recent years. For enterprises, the psychological behavior of employees has also received greater attention. This research aims to reveal how work–family balanced human resource practices (WFB-HRP) influence employees’ performance through psychological capital and how such influence was moderated by differentiated leader–member exchange (DLMX).Design/methodology/approachData were collected through a structured survey of 2,197 employees. The relationships among WFB-HRP, psychological capital, DLMX and employee performance were analyzed to understand the direct and indirect effects.FindingsThe findings reveal a positive association between WFB-HRP and employee performance, mediated by psychological capital. Moreover, DLMX moderates both the direct influence of WFB-HRP on employee performance and its indirect effect through psychological capital. Specifically, greater DLMX strengthens the impact of WFB-HRP on employee performance via psychological capital.Research limitations/implicationsThe research seeks to contribute to understanding how organizational practices influence employee performance in the context of work–family balance, with particular attention to the interplay of psychological factors and leadership dynamics.Practical implicationsThis research underscores the importance of implementing work-family balanced HR practices for enhancing employee performance. Moreover, it highlights the significance of fostering positive psychological capital among employees and cultivating differentiated leader–member exchange to maximize the effectiveness of WFB-HRP initiatives.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the literature by elucidating the mechanisms through which WFB-HRP influences employee performance, emphasizing the pivotal roles of psychological capital and DLMX. The findings offer practical insights for organizations seeking to optimize their HR practices and leadership strategies to unlock high performance in the workplace.
Q3

Stay positive, keep them committed: extending the link between positive leadership and affective commitment
Kelm S., Borchert M.
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of positive leadership (PL), a theory originating from positive psychology, on affective commitment (AC), an important outcome in times of skilled labor shortages. This study also examines psychological need satisfaction (PNS) and well-being as serial mediators between PL and AC.Design/methodology/approachA 2-wave-study with 282 employees of a German company in the finance and insurance sector was conducted. The data were analyzed using covariance analytic structural equation modeling with RStudio.FindingsThe results suggest that PL improves AC. Additionally, PNS and well-being mediate this relationship individually and serially.Originality/valueOur study is one of the few to examine PL as a leadership style in its own right and not a synonym for various leadership styles (e.g. transformational leadership) and one of the first to emphasize its importance for employee retention. Moreover, we make a unique contribution by combining work design theory and self-determination theory to examine the underlying mechanisms of the influence of PL on AC. Therefore, this research is the first to investigate a serial mediation between PL, PNS, well-being and AC.
Q3

The impact of boundary crossing on well-being among remote workers and the moderating role of nonwork role re-engagement (NWRR)
Song X., Gong B.
PurposeAs businesses are going on around the clock and the prevalence of remote work arrangements is on the rise, the boundary between work and nonwork contexts is blurring. As a result, workers often find themselves interrupted by their supervisors or colleagues during nonwork hours. However, there is still much to reveal about the impact of boundary-crossing activities on work–life balance as well as how a remote worker’s boundary management capacity may influence this impact. This paper aims to answer these unaddressed questions.Design/methodology/approachA longitudinal survey was administered using a quantitative method, with 336 US workers providing valid responses. The data were analyzed using regression-based path analysis.FindingsThe findings provide evidence that boundary-crossing activities impact remote workers’ work–life balance, and individual differences in boundary management ability, such as nonwork role re-engagement (NWRR), help employees take advantage of remote work flexibility and enhance work–life balance.Research limitations/implicationsDrawn from boundary management theory, this study reveals a process effect, through which remote work experience influences work-related interruption during nonwork hours, which impacts work–life balance and well-being. Meanwhile, this study demonstrates that individual differences in NWRR help employees take advantage of remote work flexibility and enhance work–life balance.Originality/valueThis research offers valuable insights into the intricate relationships between remote work experiences, boundary-crossing activities, work–life balance and employee well-being. By investigating the mechanisms and individual differences involved, this study contributes to both theoretical understanding and practical strategies for navigating the challenges of the evolving work landscape with remote work blended.
Q3

Does responsible leadership via voice behavior promote green behavior?
Uzum B., Ozkan O.S., Ozkurt Sivrikaya S., Ciftyildiz K.
PurposeThis study, which utilizes the job demands-resources (JD-R) theory, aims to explicate the relationship between responsible leadership (RL), green behavior (GB) and the mediating role of voice behavior (VB).Design/methodology/approachThis study used a quantitative research design. The research sample consists of 260 participants who work in five-star hotels in Izmir. The research data were collected through face-to-face and online survey methods. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in AMOS was performed to assess the measurement model. The research hypotheses were tested with structural equation modeling (SEM).FindingsThe results determined that RL affects GB and VB positively and significantly. In addition, VB has a significant positive link with GB. Furthermore, this study discovered that VB acts as a mediator in the relationship between RL and GB, indicating that RL indirectly promotes GB through implementing VB.Research limitations/implicationsThis study has limitations, such as its dependence on self-reported data, cross-sectional design and exclusive emphasis on participants from a single nation. When RL encourages employees to take GB, they are more likely to engage in GB. This study contributes to the field by evaluating the structures discussed with the JD-R theory. In the management practice of organizations, RL should be strengthened, and training should be provided to enhance RL.Originality/valueThe literature analysis revealed that, while studies have been undertaken using RL, the idea has not been tested using VB or has it been investigated in the hotel business, which has grown vital to the global economy. With these aspects, the work stands apart and serves as a source of motivation for researchers.
Q3

The shadowy realm of proactivity: how rumination fuels work–life conflict
Goswami M., Dash S.
PurposeThe current study explores the linking mechanisms and conditional processes underlying the relationship between proactive work behavior (PWB) and work-life conflict (WLC), and the mediating role of rumination. Based on the conservation of resources theory, we hypothesized that PWB is a resource-consuming activity that increases emotional and cognitive strain by making one ruminate (demarcated as reflection/reflective pondering and brooding), which in turn, results in work-to-life conflict.Design/methodology/approachMulti-phased data was obtained from 244 working Indian adults who were working full-time in organization across India. Data was analyzed using structural equation modelling, using SPSS (v.26) and AMOS (v.23).FindingsOverall, empirical data supported our model. Our finding indicates that PWB impact WLC, mediated through rumination (reflection and brooding) differentially. Brooding mediated between PWB and WLC (p < 0.001). Reflective pondering had a negative influence on WLC, and also had a negative indirect impact between PWB and WLC (p = 0.022).Originality/valueOur study adds on to the research on the negative outcome of proactive work behavior (i.e., causing work-to-life conflict). Additionally, our study also explores the indirect pathway of proactive work behavior that impacts work-life conflict, through rumination. We further demarcated between the two types of rumination, viz., reflective pondering and brooding, and established that they have different influences on this relationship between PWB and WLC.
Q3

Breaking barriers: driving HR analytics adoption in small and medium-sized enterprises
Ilyas M., Alam W., Ahmad A.
PurposeThis study aimed to investigate the primary factors driving human resource analytics adoption in small and medium-sized organizations. The research seeks to confirm and expand the UTAUT model using direct predictors and a unique moderator to understand contextual complexities in a developing country.Design/methodology/approachThis study employed convenience sampling to survey 308 HR experts with an 88% response rate, uncovering valuable insights into technology integration. SPSS and AMOS 21.0 were used for analysis.FindingsThe influencing elements for adopting human resource analytics in these firms were performance expectancy, effort expectancy, facilitating conditions and social influence. Moreover, personal innovativeness, fear appeal and perceived trust were highlighted as additional significant determinants. Finally, perceived supervisor support was reported as a significant moderator in driving human resource analytics adoption.Originality/valueThe study comprehensively models the elements that influence the adoption of human resource analytics in SMEs of a developing economy. The research validates and expands upon the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, analyzing key contributors and a unique context-specific moderator using robust statistical methods.
Q3

Organizational climate for initiative and innovative work behavior: a moderated mediation model
Hassi A., Rohlfer S., Jebsen S.
PurposeThis paper aimed at investigating the relationship between organizational climate for initiative, job autonomy, climate for innovation and innovative work behavior (IWB) in a developing economy context.Design/methodology/approachThe study surveyed 444 manufacturing businesses in Morocco, collecting data from three sources: CEOs, middle managers and non-managerial employees in the production department. The data were analyzed using structural equation modelling, the Bayesian estimation approach and the bootstrapped moderated mediation technique.FindingsThis study revealed that middle managers’ job autonomy mediates the positive link between climate for initiative and middle managers’ IWB when climate for innovation is strong.Practical implicationsThis study provides practical information for organizations intending to make their middle managers willing to be innovative in their job by granting them job autonomy and building favorable climates for initiative and innovation.Originality/valueThis research expands the human resource management and innovation literature by examining features of the work context (i.e. climates for initiative and for innovation, and job autonomy) as previous research has mainly focused on the context approach to work design (i.e. social environment of work design). The study highlights the role of middle managers as essential contributors to fostering innovations within their firms.
Q3

Measuring the impact of leadership attributes on employee engagement through psychological empowerment: a study from the pharmaceutical industry
Rasheed R., Rashid A., Tunio M.N., Amirah N.A.
PurposeManagers are continuously worried about the engagement of employees in the organization. This research aimed to investigate the employees’ perceptions regarding leadership attributes, which enhance the workers’ psychological empowerment and engagement.Design/methodology/approachA sample of 296 employees from three pharmaceutical companies based in Karachi was selected. For hypothesis testing, IBM SPSS AMOS version 24 was used to perform a confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling.FindingsThe outcomes of multiple regression analysis expressed that the attributes of a leader positively influence psychological empowerment and employee engagement. The study found that psychological empowerment partially mediates the relationship between leadership attributes (feedback and delegation) and employee retention. Furthermore, psychological empowerment has no mediation between leadership attributes (empathy) and employee retention.Originality/valueThis study offers a unique contribution by focusing on the relationship between leadership attributes (empathy, delegation and feedback) and employee engagement within the pharmaceutical industry in Karachi, a relatively underexplored context. Psychological empowerment as a partial mediator between leadership attributes and employee retention adds a novel perspective, particularly by revealing that it mediates the impact of delegation and feedback but not empathy. Moreover, this research provides actionable insights for policymakers and operational managers in industries beyond pharmaceuticals, making it valuable for enhancing employee engagement across sectors. Advanced statistical techniques like structural equation modelling and confirmatory factor analysis further reinforce the study’s methodological rigour.
Q3

The role of resilience and gender in satisfaction with life and self-efficacy: a moderated mediation framework
Saha S., Saini G.K.
PurposeTo study the mediating effect of resilience and the moderating effect of gender on the association between satisfaction with life and self-efficacy.Design/methodology/approachParticipants were 211 HR professionals; mediation and moderation hypotheses were tested using PROCESS macro.FindingsResults revealed a significant association between satisfaction with life, self-efficacy and dimensions of resilience. The mediating effect was significant for three dimensions of resilience: positive acceptance, personal competence and trust in one’s instincts. Gender moderated the relationship between satisfaction with life and self-efficacy through positive acceptance and positive competence but not trust in one’s instincts.Originality/valueMost literature examines satisfaction with life as an outcome measure despite existing calls and alternate theoretical frameworks. This study considers satisfaction with life as a predictor of self-efficacy and resilience. Linkages with theoretical frameworks and implications are discussed.
Q3

The digital escape: examining the impact of cyberloafing on gossip-induced emotional exhaustion and the mediating role of self-esteem
Kaur A., Maheshwari S., Varma A.
PurposeThis research sheds light on how workplace gossip may affect employees' emotional well-being via self-esteem. Further, the study examines the moderating role of cyberloafing in the examined relationship.Design/methodology/approachThe study employs a moderated mediation model to examine the linkage among workplace gossip, self-esteem, and emotional exhaustion, incorporating cyberloafing as a moderator. Data were gathered from 249 employees working in various industries from the US.FindingsWorkplace gossip substantially diminishes self-esteem, which is inversely related to emotional exhaustion. Notably, cyberloafing positively moderates the relationship between self-esteem and emotional exhaustion, heightening the adverse effects of gossip.Practical implicationsThe findings have critical implications for human resource management strategies. To mitigate the impact of gossip, HR managers should foster positive work environments, promote emotional well-being, and implement policies to curb cyberloafing.Originality/valueThis study expands the discussion on workplace gossip while probing the role of self-esteem and cyberloafing. It contributes to the application of the conservation of resource theory to analyze emotional well-being in organizational settings.
Q3

Toxic workplaces, tarnished outcomes: understanding the effects of bullying on job outcomes
Iqbal J., Parray Z.A., Bharadwaj S.
PurposeThis study examines the impact of workplace bullying on workers’ innovative behavior, organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and affective commitment while taking burnout into account as a potential mediator.Design/methodology/approachWe hypothesize that workplace bullying will have a detrimental effect on employees’ capacity for innovative behavior and OCB, as well as impair their affective commitment to the company, based on the Conservation of Resource theory. We used cluster sampling to gather data from 249 bank employees, using structural equation modeling to evaluate our assumptions.FindingsAccording to our research, there is a strong negative correlation between workplace bullying and innovative behavior, OCB and a reduction in affective commitment. Additionally, burnout was found to be a key mediator between these outcomes and workplace bullying, indicating a critical role for burnout in spreading the negative impacts of bullying on employees’ attitudes and behaviors.Originality/valueThe results of this study show how bullying at work harms employees’ innovative behavior, OCB and affective commitment, which might eventually lower organizational productivity and performance. It is important to develop a culture of creativity, increase employee engagement and strengthen organizational commitment by building a friendly and courteous work environment. Collectively addressing burnout and workplace bullying will increase employee well-being, job happiness and overall organizational success.
Q3

Linking paternalistic leadership and service behaviours through perceived support from supervisor and organisation: empirical evidence from the Pakistani healthcare sector
Hussain M., Luu T.T., Marjoribanks T.
PurposeDrawing upon social exchange theory, this study aims to assess whether paternalistic leadership style (authoritarianism, benevolence and morality) influences employee in-role service behaviour and extra-role service behaviour, particularly patient-oriented organisational citizenship behaviour via a dual mediation mechanism, i.e. perceived supervisor support and perceived organisational support.Design/methodology/approachThe data were gathered from doctors and nurses working in Pakistan’s public, private and semi-government hospitals. We used SPSS and AMOS 27 to run structural equation modelling.FindingsResults revealed that authoritarianism was negatively associated with in-role service behaviour and patient-oriented organisational citizenship behaviour through perceived supervisor support and perceived organisational support. In contrast, benevolent and moral behaviours of leaders were positively associated with in-role service behaviour via perceived supervisor support and perceived organisational support. However, perceived supervisor support did not mediate the relations between paternalistic leadership dimensions and patient-oriented organisational citizenship behaviour.Originality/valueOur research advances the paternalistic leadership literature concerning paternalistic leadership and employees’ service behaviours through dual mediation mechanisms and in a relatively understudied sector and national context.
Q3

Unleashing service recovery excellence: exploring the power of dimensional autonomy and thriving at work as catalysts during COVID-19
Farid H., Zhang Y., Tian M., Lu S.
PurposeThis study explores how three-dimensional job autonomy (decision-making, work method and work scheduling) affects employees’ thriving at work and service recovery performance in the hospitality industry during COVID-19.Design/methodology/approachThis study utilized cross-sectional dyadic data from 287 frontline workers in the Chinese hospitality sector and analyzed it with Analysis of Moment Structures (AMOS) and the PROCESS macro.FindingsThe findings indicate that three-dimensional autonomy has a direct impact on thriving and an indirect effect on service recovery performance (SRP) through thriving, and the relationship between three-dimensional autonomy and thriving is moderated by SOCV19R.Originality/valueThis study addresses the existing gap in research regarding the various aspects of autonomy. It explores how distinct dimensions of autonomy affect employees’ thriving at work and, in turn, influence their ability to excel in service recovery. Furthermore, it sheds light on how the unique circumstances of COVID-19, as represented by SOCV19R, play a role in understanding the dynamics between different forms of autonomy and employees’ thriving.
Q3

Interplay between innovation-oriented HRM and leadership to promote intrapreneurial behavior for innovation performance in small- and medium-sized enterprises
Rasheed M.A., Elahi N.S., Nisar Q.A., Nasir N.
PurposeDrawing on ability-motivation-opportunity (AMO) framework, this study investigates the direct effect of innovation-oriented HRM on SMEs’ innovation performance, both directly and through intrapreneurial behavior. Besides, the study assesses the moderating role of innovation-oriented leadership in the relationship between innovation-oriented HRM and intrapreneurial behavior.Design/methodology/approachA two-wave dataset collected from 183 SMEs was used to test the proposed hypotheses by partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).FindingsFindings suggest that innovation-oriented HRM positively impacts SMEs’ innovation performance directly and through intrapreneurial behavior. Evidence also confirms that innovation-oriented leadership positively moderates the effect of innovation-oriented HRM on intrapreneurial behavior.Research limitations/implicationsThrough the AMO framework, this study advances our understanding of how the interaction between innovation-oriented HRM and leadership fosters intrapreneurial behavior, ultimately contributing to superior innovation performance in SMEs.Practical implicationsThe study recommends that SMEs implement innovation-oriented HRM practices to encourage intrapreneurial behavior and achieve superior innovation performance in SMEs.Originality/valueLimited research has addressed the contributions of innovation-oriented HRM and leadership toward realizing strategic innovation objectives. Our study offers valuable insights into the functions of innovation-oriented HRM and leadership in stimulating intrapreneurial behavior, thereby enhancing the innovation performance of SMEs.
Q3

Unravelling the impact: supervisor incivility on employee health and the role of affective rumination
Kyei-Poku I., Orozco Quijano E.P.
PurposeThis study investigates the influence of supervisor incivility on two important employee health-related outcomes–somatic complaints and emotional exhaustion. Similarly, the study examines the role of affective rumination as a mediator between the supervisor incivility–somatic complaints and emotional exhaustion relationship.Design/methodology/approachWe collected data in three phases, separated by an interval of four weeks. The final sample comprised 154 employees from diverse occupations and professions. Partial least squares–structural equation modelling was used to examine the research model.FindingsEmployees’ perceptions of supervisor incivility increased somatic complaints and emotional exhaustion experiences. Moreover, drawing on the conservation of resources and the effort-recovery theories, we found support for the mediating role of affective rumination for somatic complaints but not for emotional exhaustion.Practical implicationsTo help protect organizations from financial and productivity losses related to supervisor incivility, we encouraged organizations to be aware of supervisors’ uncivil behaviours and provide training on how to deal with such behaviours. We further advise organizations to coach supervisors on uncivil prevention and the importance of modelling proper behaviours.Originality/valueThis study expands the limited knowledge of supervisor incivility and health outcomes. Specifically, using a time-lagged design, the findings show that affective rumination is an essential mechanism for understanding the impact of supervisor incivility on health outcomes. Moreover, understanding how supervisor incivility impacts employee health outcomes is vital for advancing theory and designing interventions to mitigate adverse effects.
Top-100
Citing journals
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
|
|
Journalism Studies
3700 citations, 10.36%
|
|
Journalism Practice
2859 citations, 8.01%
|
|
Journalism
2817 citations, 7.89%
|
|
Digital Journalism
2046 citations, 5.73%
|
|
International Journal of Press/Politics
568 citations, 1.59%
|
|
New Media and Society
489 citations, 1.37%
|
|
Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly
460 citations, 1.29%
|
|
International Communication Gazette
409 citations, 1.15%
|
|
Journalism and Media
319 citations, 0.89%
|
|
Media, Culture and Society
307 citations, 0.86%
|
|
Mass Communication and Society
239 citations, 0.67%
|
|
European Journal of Communication
214 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Information Communication and Society
209 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Media and Communication
206 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Journal of Communication
192 citations, 0.54%
|
|
African Journalism Studies
190 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Newspaper Research Journal
181 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Social Media and Society
181 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Media International Australia
180 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Nordicom Review
168 citations, 0.47%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
168 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Media, War and Conflict
165 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Asian Journal of Communication
162 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Convergence
144 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Journal of Media Business Studies
144 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Journalism and Mass Communication Educator
143 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Environmental Communication
143 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Political Communication
141 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Electronic News
134 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Communication Research
130 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Public Relations Review
129 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Global Media and Communication
128 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Communication Theory
124 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Feminist Media Studies
123 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Palgrave Studies in Journalism and the Global South
123 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Media Ethics: Exploring Questions of Media Morality
121 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Communications
102 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Applied Journalism and Media Studies
98 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media
92 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Profesional de la Informacion
90 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Sociology Compass
88 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Chinese Journal of Communication
87 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Frontiers in Communication
85 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Communication Inquiry
84 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
76 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Annals of the International Communication Association
76 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Communication and Sport
75 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Discourse and Communication
74 citations, 0.21%
|
|
JMM International Journal on Media Management
73 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Javnost
72 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journalism & communication monographs
72 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Media History
72 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Publizistik
72 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Health Communication
70 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Information Technology and Politics
70 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Norsk medietidsskrift
70 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Asia Pacific Media Educator
69 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Studies in Big Data
69 citations, 0.19%
|
|
American Behavioral Scientist
67 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Computers in Human Behavior
67 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of International Communication
64 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
64 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Australian Journalism Review
63 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Communication Research and Practice
62 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Critical Discourse Studies
62 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Public Understanding of Science
60 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Language and Politics
58 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Communication Review
58 citations, 0.16%
|
|
SAGE Open
57 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Atlantic Journal of Communication
55 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
55 citations, 0.15%
|
|
PLoS ONE
55 citations, 0.15%
|
|
The Agenda Setting Journal
54 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Media Asia
52 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture
50 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
46 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Communication
46 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Public Relations Research
42 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Media Practice and Education
42 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Communication Methods and Measures
41 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Social Sciences
40 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Sustainability
40 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Communication, Culture and Critique
40 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Social Science Computer Review
38 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Communicatio
38 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Springer Handbooks of Political Science and International Relations
38 citations, 0.11%
|
|
International Journal of Cultural Studies
37 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Social Semiotics
37 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Global Media and China
37 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Critical Studies in Media Communication
36 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Communication Studies
36 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Public Relations Inquiry
36 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
35 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Howard Journal of Communications
35 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Visual Communication Quarterly
35 citations, 0.1%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
34 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Online Information Review
34 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Online Media and Global Communication
34 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Comunicar
33 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Discourse, Context and Media
33 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
|
Citing publishers
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
|
|
Taylor & Francis
13715 citations, 38.41%
|
|
SAGE
8498 citations, 23.8%
|
|
Springer Nature
1773 citations, 4.96%
|
|
Wiley
1478 citations, 4.14%
|
|
Elsevier
790 citations, 2.21%
|
|
MDPI
578 citations, 1.62%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
574 citations, 1.61%
|
|
Emerald
464 citations, 1.3%
|
|
IGI Global
415 citations, 1.16%
|
|
Intellect
359 citations, 1.01%
|
|
Oxford University Press
322 citations, 0.9%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
318 citations, 0.89%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
312 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
268 citations, 0.75%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
233 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Cogitatio
208 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
183 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Goteborg University
168 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
165 citations, 0.46%
|
|
EPI SCP
103 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
99 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
61 citations, 0.17%
|
|
OpenEdition
48 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication
47 citations, 0.13%
|
|
CAIRN
46 citations, 0.13%
|
|
JMIR Publications
40 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Grupo Comunicar, Colectivo Andaluz de Educacion en Medios de Comunicacion
38 citations, 0.11%
|
|
SciELO
38 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Human Kinetics
38 citations, 0.11%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
36 citations, 0.1%
|
|
The Pennsylvania State University Press
36 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
33 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Duke University Press
32 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Universidad de Piura
27 citations, 0.08%
|
|
23 citations, 0.06%
|
|
F1000 Research
23 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
22 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
21 citations, 0.06%
|
|
20 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
19 citations, 0.05%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
18 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Baikal State University
18 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Vilnius University Press
17 citations, 0.05%
|
|
EDP Sciences
16 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Universidad de La Sabana
16 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IOS Press
15 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Communiquer. Revue de communication sociale et publique
15 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego
15 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IOP Publishing
13 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Edinburgh University Press
12 citations, 0.03%
|
|
MIT Press
12 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Uitgeverij Boom
12 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
12 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Equinox Publishing
12 citations, 0.03%
|
|
University of Westminster Press
12 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Academy of Management
11 citations, 0.03%
|
|
IntechOpen
11 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
10 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
10 citations, 0.03%
|
|
World Scientific
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Brill
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Copernicus
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Bastas Publications
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
8 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Tsinghua University Press
8 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Masaryk University Press
8 citations, 0.02%
|
|
E.W. Scripps School of Journalism, Ohio University
8 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Bristol University Press
7 citations, 0.02%
|
|
AIP Publishing
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
BMJ
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
University of California Press
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
University of Warsaw
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
PeerJ
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Stockholm University Press
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
5 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Indiana University Press
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Lviv Polytechnic National University
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Jugoslovensko udruzenje za sociologiju
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Pacific Media Centre, Auckland University of Technology
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
4 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Meteorological Society
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Institute of International Relations, Prague
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
University of Calgary Press
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Institut fur Asienkunde
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Universite Saint-Louis Bruxelles
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Kemerovo State University
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
|
|
University of Amsterdam
50 publications, 2.48%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
27 publications, 1.34%
|
|
University of Vienna
23 publications, 1.14%
|
|
University of Minnesota
21 publications, 1.04%
|
|
University of Zurich
20 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Michigan State University
20 publications, 0.99%
|
|
City, University of London
19 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
18 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
17 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University of Oxford
17 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
17 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Cardiff University
17 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Temple University
17 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University of Antwerp
16 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
16 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of Groningen
15 publications, 0.74%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
13 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
12 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Bergen
12 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Oslo Metropolitan University
12 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Oslo
11 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Roskilde University
10 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Leeds
10 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
10 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
9 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Tampere University
9 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Helsinki
9 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Loughborough University
9 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Northwestern University
9 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
9 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
8 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Ghent University
8 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Karlstad University
8 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Aarhus University
8 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Dublin City University
8 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Virginia Commonwealth University
8 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Bournemouth University
8 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Stockholm University
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Södertörn University
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Melbourne
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Georgetown University
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Hong Kong Baptist University
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Colorado State University
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Sheffield
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Appalachian State University
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Alabama
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Houston
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Sydney
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Deakin University
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Canberra
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Stellenbosch University
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
George Washington University
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Arizona State University
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Washington
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Münster
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Navarra
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Florida
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Massey University
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Boston University
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Michigan
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Portsmouth
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Northwestern University in Qatar
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Haifa
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Neuchâtel
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Turku
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Universite Libre de Bruxelles
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Iowa State University
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Monash University
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Queensland
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
La Trobe University
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Syracuse University
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
New York University
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Arizona
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Nottingham Ningbo China
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Leiden University
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Toronto Metropolitan University
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Ljubljana
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Miami
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Louisiana State University
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
University of Utah
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Sam Houston State University
4 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
|
University of Amsterdam
38 publications, 6.46%
|
|
University of Minnesota
19 publications, 3.23%
|
|
University of Zurich
14 publications, 2.38%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
13 publications, 2.21%
|
|
University of Vienna
13 publications, 2.21%
|
|
University of Bergen
11 publications, 1.87%
|
|
Oslo Metropolitan University
11 publications, 1.87%
|
|
University of Antwerp
11 publications, 1.87%
|
|
University of Groningen
11 publications, 1.87%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
10 publications, 1.7%
|
|
Michigan State University
10 publications, 1.7%
|
|
Cardiff University
10 publications, 1.7%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
9 publications, 1.53%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
8 publications, 1.36%
|
|
City, University of London
8 publications, 1.36%
|
|
Roskilde University
8 publications, 1.36%
|
|
Loughborough University
8 publications, 1.36%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
8 publications, 1.36%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
8 publications, 1.36%
|
|
University of Helsinki
7 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
7 publications, 1.19%
|
|
University of Oxford
7 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Dublin City University
7 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
7 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Temple University
7 publications, 1.19%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
7 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Tampere University
6 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Georgetown University
6 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Northwestern University
6 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
6 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
6 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
6 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Bournemouth University
6 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
5 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
5 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Aarhus University
5 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
5 publications, 0.85%
|
|
University of Michigan
5 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
5 publications, 0.85%
|
|
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht
5 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
5 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Appalachian State University
5 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Ghent University
4 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Karlstad University
4 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Södertörn University
4 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Oslo
4 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre
4 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Canberra
4 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Arizona State University
4 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Washington
4 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Leiden University
4 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Virginia Commonwealth University
4 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
4 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Navarra
4 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Florida
4 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Alabama
4 publications, 0.68%
|
|
University of Houston
4 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Haifa
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Stockholm University
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Neuchâtel
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Xiamen University
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Turku
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Jyväskylä
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
National University of Singapore
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Sydney
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Universite Libre de Bruxelles
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Stavanger
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Iowa State University
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Technical University of Dortmund
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Boston University
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Washington State University
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Hong Kong Baptist University
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of South Florida
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Hamburg University
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Utrecht University
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Sheffield
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Ljubljana
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Utah
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Texas State University
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Portsmouth
3 publications, 0.51%
|
|
University of Sharjah
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Istanbul University
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Indore
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Cyprus
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Northwestern University in Qatar
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Lund University
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Mid Sweden University
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Technische Universität Dresden
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Università della Svizzera italiana
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Fribourg
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong–Liverpool University
2 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
|
USA
|
USA, 342, 16.94%
USA
342 publications, 16.94%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 138, 6.84%
United Kingdom
138 publications, 6.84%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 90, 4.46%
Netherlands
90 publications, 4.46%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 86, 4.26%
Germany
86 publications, 4.26%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 55, 2.72%
Norway
55 publications, 2.72%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 52, 2.58%
Australia
52 publications, 2.58%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 47, 2.33%
Sweden
47 publications, 2.33%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 42, 2.08%
Belgium
42 publications, 2.08%
|
China
|
China, 39, 1.93%
China
39 publications, 1.93%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 36, 1.78%
Denmark
36 publications, 1.78%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 31, 1.54%
Spain
31 publications, 1.54%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 31, 1.54%
Switzerland
31 publications, 1.54%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 30, 1.49%
Austria
30 publications, 1.49%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 23, 1.14%
Singapore
23 publications, 1.14%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 22, 1.09%
Israel
22 publications, 1.09%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 21, 1.04%
Finland
21 publications, 1.04%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 18, 0.89%
Canada
18 publications, 0.89%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 14, 0.69%
South Africa
14 publications, 0.69%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 13, 0.64%
Brazil
13 publications, 0.64%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 12, 0.59%
Ireland
12 publications, 0.59%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 9, 0.45%
Italy
9 publications, 0.45%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 8, 0.4%
New Zealand
8 publications, 0.4%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 8, 0.4%
Chile
8 publications, 0.4%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 7, 0.35%
Colombia
7 publications, 0.35%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 6, 0.3%
Qatar
6 publications, 0.3%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 6, 0.3%
Japan
6 publications, 0.3%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 5, 0.25%
Portugal
5 publications, 0.25%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 5, 0.25%
UAE
5 publications, 0.25%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 5, 0.25%
Slovenia
5 publications, 0.25%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 4, 0.2%
Russia
4 publications, 0.2%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 4, 0.2%
Bangladesh
4 publications, 0.2%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 4, 0.2%
Cyprus
4 publications, 0.2%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 4, 0.2%
Mexico
4 publications, 0.2%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 3, 0.15%
Ukraine
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 3, 0.15%
Argentina
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 3, 0.15%
Hungary
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 3, 0.15%
Greece
3 publications, 0.15%
|
India
|
India, 3, 0.15%
India
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 3, 0.15%
Indonesia
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 3, 0.15%
Poland
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 3, 0.15%
Republic of Korea
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 3, 0.15%
Turkey
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 3, 0.15%
Czech Republic
3 publications, 0.15%
|
France
|
France, 2, 0.1%
France
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 2, 0.1%
Egypt
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 2, 0.1%
Iceland
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 2, 0.1%
Costa Rica
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 2, 0.1%
Latvia
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 2, 0.1%
Lebanon
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 2, 0.1%
Lithuania
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 2, 0.1%
Nigeria
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 2, 0.1%
Pakistan
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 2, 0.1%
Philippines
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.05%
Estonia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Albania
|
Albania, 1, 0.05%
Albania
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Bolivia
|
Bolivia, 1, 0.05%
Bolivia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Burkina Faso
|
Burkina Faso, 1, 0.05%
Burkina Faso
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.05%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.05%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 1, 0.05%
Zimbabwe
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 1, 0.05%
Kenya
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Kyrgyzstan
|
Kyrgyzstan, 1, 0.05%
Kyrgyzstan
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 1, 0.05%
Cuba
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.05%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 1, 0.05%
Malawi
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.05%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.05%
Peru
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.05%
Romania
1 publication, 0.05%
|
El Salvador
|
El Salvador, 1, 0.05%
El Salvador
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.05%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.05%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Fiji
|
Fiji, 1, 0.05%
Fiji
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 1, 0.05%
Ecuador
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Show all (43 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
|
|
USA
|
USA, 191, 32.48%
USA
191 publications, 32.48%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 69, 11.73%
United Kingdom
69 publications, 11.73%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 66, 11.22%
Netherlands
66 publications, 11.22%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 53, 9.01%
Germany
53 publications, 9.01%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 37, 6.29%
Norway
37 publications, 6.29%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 27, 4.59%
Belgium
27 publications, 4.59%
|
China
|
China, 26, 4.42%
China
26 publications, 4.42%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 25, 4.25%
Sweden
25 publications, 4.25%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 22, 3.74%
Spain
22 publications, 3.74%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 22, 3.74%
Switzerland
22 publications, 3.74%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 21, 3.57%
Australia
21 publications, 3.57%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 20, 3.4%
Denmark
20 publications, 3.4%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 18, 3.06%
Austria
18 publications, 3.06%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 15, 2.55%
Finland
15 publications, 2.55%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 13, 2.21%
Israel
13 publications, 2.21%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 12, 2.04%
Canada
12 publications, 2.04%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 12, 2.04%
Singapore
12 publications, 2.04%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 10, 1.7%
Ireland
10 publications, 1.7%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 9, 1.53%
Brazil
9 publications, 1.53%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 7, 1.19%
South Africa
7 publications, 1.19%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 5, 0.85%
UAE
5 publications, 0.85%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 5, 0.85%
Chile
5 publications, 0.85%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 4, 0.68%
Italy
4 publications, 0.68%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 4, 0.68%
Cyprus
4 publications, 0.68%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 4, 0.68%
Colombia
4 publications, 0.68%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 4, 0.68%
Slovenia
4 publications, 0.68%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 3, 0.51%
Hungary
3 publications, 0.51%
|
India
|
India, 3, 0.51%
India
3 publications, 0.51%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 3, 0.51%
Mexico
3 publications, 0.51%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 3, 0.51%
Republic of Korea
3 publications, 0.51%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 3, 0.51%
Turkey
3 publications, 0.51%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 3, 0.51%
Japan
3 publications, 0.51%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 2, 0.34%
Russia
2 publications, 0.34%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 2, 0.34%
Portugal
2 publications, 0.34%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 2, 0.34%
Greece
2 publications, 0.34%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 2, 0.34%
Qatar
2 publications, 0.34%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 2, 0.34%
Lithuania
2 publications, 0.34%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 2, 0.34%
New Zealand
2 publications, 0.34%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 2, 0.34%
Poland
2 publications, 0.34%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 2, 0.34%
Philippines
2 publications, 0.34%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 0.34%
Czech Republic
2 publications, 0.34%
|
France
|
France, 1, 0.17%
France
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.17%
Ukraine
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.17%
Estonia
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.17%
Argentina
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.17%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Bolivia
|
Bolivia, 1, 0.17%
Bolivia
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Burkina Faso
|
Burkina Faso, 1, 0.17%
Burkina Faso
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.17%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 1, 0.17%
Egypt
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 1, 0.17%
Zimbabwe
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.17%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.17%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 1, 0.17%
Kenya
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Kyrgyzstan
|
Kyrgyzstan, 1, 0.17%
Kyrgyzstan
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 1, 0.17%
Costa Rica
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 1, 0.17%
Cuba
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.17%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.17%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.17%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.17%
Peru
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.17%
Romania
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.17%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 1, 0.17%
Serbia
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 1, 0.17%
Ecuador
1 publication, 0.17%
|
Show all (35 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
|
2 profile journal articles
de-Lima-Santos Mathias-Felipe
🥼 🤝
PhD, Lecturer

Macquarie University
49 publications,
430 citations
h-index: 11
1 profile journal article
Riegert Kristina
1 publication,
6 citations
h-index: 1
1 profile journal article
Liang Hai
56 publications,
996 citations
h-index: 17