Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
4.7
SJR
2.105
CiteScore
9.4
Categories
Genetics
Genetics (clinical)
Molecular Biology
Areas
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Medicine
Years of issue
2016-2025
journal names
npj Genomic Medicine
NPJ GENOM MED
Top-3 citing journals

International Journal of Molecular Sciences
(232 citations)

npj Genomic Medicine
(195 citations)

Frontiers in Genetics
(193 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Toronto
(45 publications)

Hospital for Sick Children
(41 publications)

Harvard University
(34 publications)

Harvard University
(27 publications)

University of Toronto
(26 publications)

Hospital for Sick Children
(23 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 2850

Analysis of The Role of Deep Learning Models in Image Classification Applications
Li X.
Image classification is a fundamental task in computer science, underpinning various applications such as object detection, face recognition, and object interaction analysis. The concept holds significant value due to its wide-ranging applications across multiple fields. Traditional methods for image classification, however, have been limited by their slow processing speed, rigidity, and high costs. The integration of deep learning models, particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Support Vector Machines (SVMs), has revolutionized this process, enabling the development of automated, fast, and practical systems. These advanced models are now employed in diverse areas, including biomedical science, remote sensing, and business management, thanks to their ability to achieve high accuracy across a broad spectrum of scenarios. Training these models involves the use of well-known datasets like Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR) and Modified National Institute of Standards and Technology (MNIST), which provide the necessary data for optimization and validation. The paper examines the structure, functionality, advantages, and limitations of CNNs and SVMs in the context of image classification, demonstrating that deep learning-driven classification is now a mainstream research focus. This study highlights the transformative impact of these models and provides insights into their future potential.

Comparative Analysis of YOLO Variants Based on Performance Evaluation for Object Detection
Chen A.
This study focuses on analysing and exploring the You Only Look Once (YOLO) algorithm. Specifically, this article analyses the evolution and performance of three versions (YOLOv1, YOLOv5, and YOLOv8) in object detection. The research begins by detailing the fundamental concepts of object detection and the datasets commonly used in this field. It then delves into the specific architectures and experimental outcomes associated with each YOLO version. The analysis reveals that while YOLOv8 introduces advanced features and improvements, earlier versions like YOLOv5 may offer superior stability and performance under certain conditions, particularly in specific tasks such as car detection. The discussion emphasizes the significant impact of factors such as batch size on model performance, suggesting that fine-tuning these parameters can optimize the algorithm for particular applications. The study concludes that the future of YOLO development lies in exploring and refining different variants, particularly those of YOLOv8, to better meet diverse requirements. By focusing on five distinct YOLOv8 variants, the research aims to enhance the adaptability and effectiveness of the YOLO framework across a wide range of object detection challenges, thereby contributing valuable insights into the ongoing advancement of this technology.

Comparison of Fully Convolutional Networks and U-Net for Optic Disc and Optic Cup Segmentation
Jin Z.
Glaucoma, the leading cause of irreversible blindness, must be diagnosed early and thus treated in time. However, it has no noticeable symptoms in its early stages and may not be detected easily. This paper aims to compare two well-known convolutional neural network (CNN) structures, namely Fully Convolutional Networks (FCNs) and U-Net for the segmentation of the optic disc (OD) and optic cup (OC) from retinal fundus images which play an important role in glaucoma diagnosis. The performance of both models is assessed using qualitative parameters such as the Dice coefficient, Jaccard index, and cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) error. In our experiment, the U-Net model yields more accurate segmentation results with 0.9601 average pixel accuracy and 0.9255 dice score for OD segmentation, outperforming the FCNs model with 0.9560 average pixel accuracy and 0.9132 dice score for OD segmentation. However, FCNs have a shorter inference time of 0. 0043 seconds against U-net’s 0. 0062 seconds making FCNs more suitable for real-time applications. The restrictions related to this study include biases from using only one dataset acquired from particular imaging devices, dependency on mask-based cropping techniques, and comparison being restricted to two fundamental architectures. This work presents the contribution of the deep learning models in improving glaucoma screening and therefore helping in avoiding blindness.

Sentiment Analysis of Mobile Phone Reviews Using XGBoost and Word Vectors
Wang Z.
Consumer reviews are an important source of data used to judge and examine consumer sentiment, and data mining for reviews of electronic products is an important way to help improve the design of electronic products. The research is based on the consumer reviews of online cell phone e-commerce, The paper constructs a sentiment dictionary in this field based on the Sentiment Oriented Point Mutual Information (SO-PMI) algorithm, and the sentiment weight of the review word vectors. An extreme Gradient Boosting Tree (XGBoost) is used to integrate word vectors and a Large Language Model (LLM) to construct a sentiment recognition model, and finally, a review sentiment index is derived, which unfolds from multiple dimensions to analyze the sentiment tendency in consumer reviews. The empirical analysis shows that the accuracy, recall, area under the curve (AUC), and other validation indexes of the constructed sentiment recognition model are further improved compared with the LLM model, which has a certain application value. When applying the weighted word vector method, the model has been significantly improved compared with the LLM model, the accuracy is increased by 5%, the accuracy is increased by 10%, and the comprehensive accuracy is increased by 2% after the comprehensive application of the two.

A Hybrid Machine Learning Framework for Soccer Match Outcome Prediction: Incorporating Bivariate Poisson Distribution
Chen Z.A.
The 2022 FIFA World Cup final attracted 1.5 billion viewers, while billions of dollars are wagered on soccer matches every year. The increasing demand for accurate predictions, both for academic research and betting purposes, has driven the development of advanced forecasting models. This study explores the application of mathematical and machine learning models to predict results of soccer matches, with the dual aim of academic advancement and profitable betting. The author utilizes a comprehensive dataset from top European leagues (2014-2022) and employ models including Bivariate Poisson Distribution, Naive Bayes, Neural Networks, Support Vector Machines, Random Forests, and Gradient Boosting. The paper’s feature engineering combines historical match statistics, FIFA ratings, and betting odds. While Random Forests achieved the highest accuracy (56.25%), predicting draws remains challenging. The study highlights the potential for improved prediction systems and suggests future research in advanced draw prediction techniques and profitability analysis, the paper provides research directions for researchers in related fields.

The Applications and Prospects of Large Language Models in Traffic Flow Prediction
Liu Y.
Predicting traffic flow is crucial for the functionality of intelligent transportation systems. It is of critical importance to relieve traffic pressure, reduce accident rates, and alleviate environmental pollution. It is an important part of the construction of modern intelligent road networks. With advancements in deep learning (DL), DL models have made notable strides in prediction. However, due to the complexity and non-transparency of DL models themselves, there are still problems of low accuracy and interpretability in traffic flow prediction (TFP). Leveraging large language models (LLM) helps to improve the negative conditions caused by other DL models in prediction. This paper first briefly summarizes the basic characteristics of LLM and their advantages in TFP; then conducts relevant research and analysis in the order of experimental design steps comparison and results and conclusions comparison; then analyzes and discusses the current problems and challenges faced by LLM; finally, it looks forward to future research directions and development trends, and summarizes this paper.

Hierarchical Learning: A Hybrid of Federated Learning and Personalization Fine-Tuning
Li S., Zhang B.
Hierarchical Federated Learning (FL) presents a novel approach that combines global model training with localized personalization fine-tuning to enhance the predictive accuracy of decentralized machine learning systems. Traditional FL methods, which allow multiple clients to collaboratively train a global model without sharing raw data, are hindered by issues such as non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) data, communication overhead, and limited generalization across diverse client datasets. This study proposes a hierarchical model that mitigates these challenges by incorporating a global model, trained using the Federated Averaging (FedAvg) algorithm, and applying client-specific fine-tuning to improve local model performance. The experiment conducted on a movie recommendation system demonstrates that this hierarchical approach significantly reduces the global model’s error while offering personalized improvements on client-specific datasets. Results show an average Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) reduction of 0.0460 following local personalization. This hybrid approach not only enhances model accuracy but also preserves data privacy and increases scalability, making it a promising solution for decentralized recommendation systems.

Research and Application of Heart Disease Prediction Model Based on Machine Learning
Bao Y.
As heart disease has become the leading cause of death worldwide, early and accurate prediction is crucial to help doctors make initial judgments about patients and improve their survival rates. This study aims to improve the accuracy and efficiency of heart disease prediction through Machine learning (ML) methods to help medical diagnosis. A heart disease dataset was used in the study, and multiple ML models were used to analyze multiple key health features, and the model performance was verified through a test set. This paper concludes that Logistic regression and random forests perform well in this task and have high practical value. Future research can stack models and optimize data sources to improve the practical performance of the model. This study provides a basic framework for building an intelligent medical auxiliary diagnosis system, which helps to achieve early prevention and timely judgment of heart disease, thereby improving the overall efficiency of medical services.

Advances in Image Generation Technology: Exploring GANs and MirrorGANs
Shi L.
This paper is an in-depth study by delving into the latest in image generation technology, where thesis is focusing on the Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and MirrorGANs possibilities. Image Generation is the backbone of visual computing, mostly utilized in intelligent designs. It is for this reason that this research aims at unravelling the theoretical basis and consolidated practices of GANs when it conies to generating both high-quality and semantically consistent imagery. The study will investigate the whole of the image generation process, starting from data preprocessing to the use of GANs to generate images from textual descriptions. The work discussed the relevance as well as the limitations of these technologies from the artistic point of view, medical imaging, and virtual reality. Tire article concludes that the paper sketches the data and experiments that show that the realism and richness hi picture quality are accentuated when GANs and MirrorGANs are incorporated. This suggests the scope of image-generation technology to enhance human-machine collaboration and allow for innovating hi smart tech. Further studies will be geared to enhancing these methods and consequently drawing humanity and machines closer, which hi nun will fuel the ongoing progress in this fast-paced sphere.

Effectiveness Evaluation of Random Forest, Naive Bayes, and Support Vector Machine Models for KDDCUP99 Anomaly Detection Based on K-means Clustering
Zhang M.
Security in the World Wide Web has recently seen an enormous upgrade in almost every aspect. Identifying malicious activities hi a network such as network attacks and malicious users plays a significant role hi these upgraded security directions. This research utilizes the KDDCUP99 dataset to incorporate K-means clustering with three classifiers: Random Forest (RF). Naïve Bayes (NB). and Support Vector Machine (SVM) with the goal to boost the accuracy of predicting network intrusions. In tins paper. K-means clustering technique is applied as a preprocessing step to enhance the overall quality of network intrusion detection and maximize the accuracy of the network security measures. The goal is to identify anomalies with high accuracy. Experimental results hidicate that the optimal combination is K-means + RF. which outperformed the others hi precision, recall, and Fl-score. Although K-means + NB demonstrated superior recall for certahi smaller anomalies, it underperformed compared to the RF model. The paper concludes by highlighting the value of ensemble approaches, in particular Random Forest, for tackling anomaly detection and network security issues, particularly hi light of the expanding significance of social networks and the internet.

Time Series Analysis: Application of LSTM model in predicting PM 2.5 concentration in Beijing
Yang R.
Air pollution forecasting for public health and policy-making has a critical importance, this paper employs a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model to perform in-depth prediction of PM2.5 concentrations measured at the U.S. Embassy in Beijing, outperforming regular forecasting approaches. In the LSTM model, the research examines a very detailed hourly dataset and beats regular forecasting approaches. A key finding is the model’s ability to effectively generalize from historical data to predict future air quality trends, with its adeptness at handling time-dependent relationships. This research emphasizes the importance of LSTM in air pollution prediction and management in environmental science as it provides an effective means for planning and making decisions on air quality management. This research is of great importance in providing a groundwork for further enhancement of prediction modeling. By offering a more reliable and sophisticated picture of air quality variations, this study addresses the current problem about how urban air pollution control could be improved in the city.

Research on Analyzing the Emotional Polarity of Malicious Swipe Comments on E-commerce Platforms Based on NPL
Ren C.
In the era of rapid advancements in natural language processing (NLP) models, these technologies have immense potential to detect and address societal issues, enhancing the functioning of the digital society. Online shopping platforms rely heavily on user reviews to influence buyer decisions, yet malicious reviews can significantly degrade user experience. This study focuses on analyzing the emotional polarity of malicious brushorder (falsely generated) reviews in e-commerce product comments, utilizing the Jingdong product review dataset. The methodology involves utilizing the Word2Vec model to vectorize the text data, followed by principal component analysis (PCA) for outlier detection to identify potential malicious reviews based on their unique characteristics. The PCA results are further leveraged for dimensionality reduction, simplifying the dataset. Subsequently, the BERT model is employed to perform semantic similarity analysis, allowing for the screening and expansion of the experimental dataset with similar malicious comments. This enriched dataset is then subjected to sentiment polarity analysis, enabling a deeper tinderstanding of the nature and impact of these malicious reviews. By facilitating buyers in making informed decisions based on genuine reviews, this research underscores the practical value of NLP hi addressing real-world challenges in e-commerce.

The Use of Natural Language Processing Model in Literary Style Analysis of Chinese Text
Ye J.
In recent years, research on Natural Language Processing (NLP) has made consistent progress and has become a popular topic. As a promising branch of Machine Learning, NLP focuses on the understanding, generating and analysing of human languages. The applications of NLP include chatbots and language translation. This paper represents a HanLP based NLP model. The model is capable of analysing the literary style of given Chinese text by quantifying the literary style of the text on the basis of five fundamental elements, namely literary grace, sentiments, momentum, climate and lingering charm. This paper presents the input and output data of the research and conducts analyses on these data. Moreover, this paper draws a conclusion on the deviation rate and robustness of the model. It is reckoned that this model initially possesses the function of literary style analysis of Chinese text. The research, per se, along with its data, is capable of being reference for research in NLP and related fields.

Sql injection detection using Naïve Bayes classifier: A probabilistic approach for web application security
Lu Z.
A pervasive security issue in web applications is database injection, enabling attackers to alter SQL queries in order to get unauthorized access to confidential information. Using the Naive Bayes classifier, a probabilistic model specifically developed for text classification tasks, this work introduces a novel method for detecting SQL injection vulnerabilities.The process begins by collecting and organizing a comprehensive dataset, which includes both harmful and non-malicious SQL queries. Feature extraction is later employed to identify patterns and characteristics commonly associated with SQL injection, such as certain SQL clauses and logical operators. This collection of attributes is employed to generate a feature vector that serves as the input for the Naive Bayes classification algorithms. The classifier is trained using a labeled dataset and then learns to distinguish between benign and malicious requests by assessing their computed probabilities. Conventional measures such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score are employed to assess the model’s ability in correctly identifying SQL while reducing false positive classifications.The present study demonstrates the potential of Naive Bayes in enhancing online application security by providing a methodical and scalable strategy for identifying SQL injection attacks.

Image Inpainting of Portraits Artwork Design and Implementation
Zhang H.
In modern society, the restoration of artwork has become increasingly important. Generative models can provide reference images for the damaged or blurred core areas of these artworks. This paper simulates artificial damage to classic portrait paintings in the Art Portraits dataset by adding center masks during data preprocessing and then implements the image inpainting task. During the training phase, the Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model (DDPM) is fine-tuned by progressively adding noise to the center-masked images in the noising stage, followed by denoising in the denoising stage to generate images. The generated images are compared with the original undamaged images through loss calculations to optimize the model. Additionally, a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN), which has shown promising results on other datasets, is used as a baseline for comparison. The damaged images are used as inputs, and the generated images are compared to the ground truth to evaluate the performance of both models. In the testing phase, two widely used metrics in image evaluation, Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Fréchet Inception Distance (FID), are introduced to assess the performance. The fine-tuned DDPM achieves an MSE of 0.2622 and an FID of 16.85, while the GAN scores 0.2835 and 22.78, respectively. Since lower values indicate higher fidelity in reproducing the original image, which is crucial for art restoration, the conclusion drawn from this paper is that the fine-tuned DDPM demonstrates higher accuracy and is more suitable for restoration projects related to Art Portraits.
Top-100
Citing journals
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
232 citations, 2.28%
|
|
npj Genomic Medicine
195 citations, 1.91%
|
|
Frontiers in Genetics
193 citations, 1.89%
|
|
Scientific Reports
170 citations, 1.67%
|
|
Cancers
154 citations, 1.51%
|
|
Genetics in Medicine
136 citations, 1.33%
|
|
Genes
129 citations, 1.27%
|
|
European Journal of Human Genetics
120 citations, 1.18%
|
|
Nature Communications
109 citations, 1.07%
|
|
American Journal of Human Genetics
103 citations, 1.01%
|
|
Frontiers in Oncology
87 citations, 0.85%
|
|
Frontiers in Immunology
79 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Human Mutation
78 citations, 0.77%
|
|
American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A
74 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Genome Medicine
69 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Journal of Personalized Medicine
58 citations, 0.57%
|
|
PLoS ONE
56 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Journal of Medical Genetics
53 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Human Genetics
51 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Frontiers in Pharmacology
49 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Cells
45 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Frontiers in Pediatrics
42 citations, 0.41%
|
|
European Journal of Medical Genetics
41 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
41 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Journal of Genetic Counseling
40 citations, 0.39%
|
|
BMC Medical Genomics
40 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Molecular genetics & genomic medicine
36 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Nucleic Acids Research
36 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
34 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
34 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Clinical Genetics
33 citations, 0.32%
|
|
JCO Precision Oncology
31 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Human Genomics
31 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
30 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Pharmacogenomics
28 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Human Molecular Genetics
27 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
27 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Nature Reviews Genetics
27 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Translational Medicine
27 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Biomedicines
27 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Cell Genomics
27 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Pediatric Research
26 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Children
26 citations, 0.26%
|
|
JAMA network open
25 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Human Genetics
25 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Advances in Molecular Pathology
25 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
24 citations, 0.24%
|
|
BMC Cancer
24 citations, 0.24%
|
|
BMC Genomics
24 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Briefings in Bioinformatics
24 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
24 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies
23 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Communications Biology
22 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Diagnostics
22 citations, 0.22%
|
|
npj Precision Oncology
22 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Clinical Epigenetics
21 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Molecular Psychiatry
21 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Prenatal Diagnosis
21 citations, 0.21%
|
|
PLoS Genetics
20 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Frontiers in Neurology
20 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Clinical Cancer Research
20 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Methods in Molecular Biology
19 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Nature Genetics
19 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Genome Research
19 citations, 0.19%
|
|
International Journal of Neonatal Screening
18 citations, 0.18%
|
|
iScience
17 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Pediatrics
17 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
17 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Biomolecules
17 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Nature
17 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Heliyon
17 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Genome Biology
17 citations, 0.17%
|
|
EBioMedicine
17 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Frontiers in Microbiology
17 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Clinical and Translational Science
16 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine
16 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Gene
15 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
15 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Cell Reports
15 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Frontiers in Neuroscience
15 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Cell
15 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Frontiers in Medicine
15 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Bioinformatics
15 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
15 citations, 0.15%
|
|
eLife
15 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
14 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
14 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Translational Psychiatry
14 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Frontiers in Endocrinology
14 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Brain
14 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Pharmaceuticals
13 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
13 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychiatry
13 citations, 0.13%
|
|
BMC Bioinformatics
13 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Oncotarget
13 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Current Opinion in Genetics and Development
13 citations, 0.13%
|
|
British Journal of Cancer
13 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Familial Cancer
13 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Nature Medicine
13 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Molecular Autism
13 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
|
Springer Nature
2394 citations, 23.5%
|
|
Elsevier
1780 citations, 17.47%
|
|
MDPI
973 citations, 9.55%
|
|
Wiley
853 citations, 8.37%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
748 citations, 7.34%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
734 citations, 7.2%
|
|
Oxford University Press
332 citations, 3.26%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
219 citations, 2.15%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
207 citations, 2.03%
|
|
BMJ
149 citations, 1.46%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
100 citations, 0.98%
|
|
SAGE
83 citations, 0.81%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
69 citations, 0.68%
|
|
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
55 citations, 0.54%
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
54 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Annual Reviews
41 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
38 citations, 0.37%
|
|
S. Karger AG
38 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
36 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
33 citations, 0.32%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
31 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
31 citations, 0.3%
|
|
JMIR Publications
30 citations, 0.29%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
29 citations, 0.28%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
29 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
27 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Impact Journals
24 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
24 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
22 citations, 0.22%
|
|
OAE Publishing Inc.
22 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
21 citations, 0.21%
|
|
American Society for Clinical Investigation
20 citations, 0.2%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
17 citations, 0.17%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
17 citations, 0.17%
|
|
IntechOpen
17 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
16 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO)
16 citations, 0.16%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
15 citations, 0.15%
|
|
The Endocrine Society
15 citations, 0.15%
|
|
14 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
13 citations, 0.13%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
13 citations, 0.13%
|
|
12 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Society of Hematology
12 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
12 citations, 0.12%
|
|
F1000 Research
12 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
11 citations, 0.11%
|
|
American Association for Clinical Chemistry
11 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Rockefeller University Press
10 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Portland Press
9 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Medknow
9 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IOS Press
8 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
8 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
8 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Physiological Society
8 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Microbiology Society
8 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Scientific Societies
8 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Media Sphere Publishing House
8 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Neoplasia Press
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Publishing House ABV Press
7 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB)
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Bioscientifica
6 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Diabetes Association
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Society of Nephrology
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
PeerJ
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Thoracic Society
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
European Respiratory Society (ERS)
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Association of Military Surgeons of the US
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
5 citations, 0.05%
|
|
King Saud University
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Genetica
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Massachusetts Medical Society
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Epilepsy Society
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IGI Global
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Life Science Alliance, LLC
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Korean Society of Medical Genetics
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Higher Education Press
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Korean Society of Genetics
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Society for the Study of Reproduction
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
National Academy of Pediatric Science and Innovation
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Korean Society of Pediartic Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
SciELO
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
CMA Impact Inc.
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The American Association of Immunologists
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Psychiatric Association Publishing
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
XMLink
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
EDP Sciences
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Royal Society
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ferrata Storti Foundation
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Speech Language Hearing Association
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
ifmbe proceedings
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Editions E D K
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Society for Translational Oncology
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
|
University of Toronto
45 publications, 9.07%
|
|
Hospital for Sick Children
41 publications, 8.27%
|
|
Harvard University
34 publications, 6.85%
|
|
University of Melbourne
23 publications, 4.64%
|
|
Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
19 publications, 3.83%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
18 publications, 3.63%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
17 publications, 3.43%
|
|
Murdoch Children's Research Institute
17 publications, 3.43%
|
|
Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego
17 publications, 3.43%
|
|
Stanford University
15 publications, 3.02%
|
|
Brigham and Women's Hospital
15 publications, 3.02%
|
|
Baylor College of Medicine
15 publications, 3.02%
|
|
National Human Genome Research Institute
15 publications, 3.02%
|
|
University of Sydney
14 publications, 2.82%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
14 publications, 2.82%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
14 publications, 2.82%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
13 publications, 2.62%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
13 publications, 2.62%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
13 publications, 2.62%
|
|
University of Cambridge
12 publications, 2.42%
|
|
King's College London
11 publications, 2.22%
|
|
Boston Children's Hospital
11 publications, 2.22%
|
|
University Medical Center Utrecht
11 publications, 2.22%
|
|
University of New South Wales
10 publications, 2.02%
|
|
Columbia University
10 publications, 2.02%
|
|
University of Washington
10 publications, 2.02%
|
|
McGill University
10 publications, 2.02%
|
|
Cleveland Clinic
10 publications, 2.02%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
9 publications, 1.81%
|
|
University of Queensland
9 publications, 1.81%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
9 publications, 1.81%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
9 publications, 1.81%
|
|
University of Michigan
9 publications, 1.81%
|
|
Western University
9 publications, 1.81%
|
|
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
9 publications, 1.81%
|
|
Sorbonne University
8 publications, 1.61%
|
|
University of Manchester
8 publications, 1.61%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
8 publications, 1.61%
|
|
University of Adelaide
8 publications, 1.61%
|
|
Garvan Institute of Medical Research
8 publications, 1.61%
|
|
Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne
8 publications, 1.61%
|
|
Paris Cité University
8 publications, 1.61%
|
|
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
8 publications, 1.61%
|
|
McMaster University
8 publications, 1.61%
|
|
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
8 publications, 1.61%
|
|
Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven
7 publications, 1.41%
|
|
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
7 publications, 1.41%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
7 publications, 1.41%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
7 publications, 1.41%
|
|
Cornell University
7 publications, 1.41%
|
|
Yale University
7 publications, 1.41%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
7 publications, 1.41%
|
|
Agency for Science, Technology and Research
7 publications, 1.41%
|
|
University Medical Center Groningen
7 publications, 1.41%
|
|
Amsterdam University Medical Center
7 publications, 1.41%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
7 publications, 1.41%
|
|
University of Alberta
7 publications, 1.41%
|
|
King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Zhejiang University
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Fudan University
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Sidra Medical and Research Center
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Imperial College London
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
University College London
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Oslo University Hospital
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
National University of Singapore
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
National Taiwan University Hospital
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
University of Western Australia
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Duke University
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
University of Chicago
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
University of British Columbia
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Leiden University Medical Center
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Emory University
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
University of Utah
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Toronto General Hospital
6 publications, 1.21%
|
|
King Abdulaziz University
5 publications, 1.01%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
5 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Peking University
5 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Karolinska University Hospital
5 publications, 1.01%
|
|
University of Milan
5 publications, 1.01%
|
|
University of Oxford
5 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
5 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
5 publications, 1.01%
|
|
South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute
5 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Seoul National University
5 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Northwestern University
5 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Ohio State University
5 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
5 publications, 1.01%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
5 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Cardiff University
5 publications, 1.01%
|
|
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
5 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
|
Harvard University
27 publications, 7.58%
|
|
University of Toronto
26 publications, 7.3%
|
|
Hospital for Sick Children
23 publications, 6.46%
|
|
University of Melbourne
16 publications, 4.49%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
14 publications, 3.93%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
13 publications, 3.65%
|
|
Murdoch Children's Research Institute
12 publications, 3.37%
|
|
Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
12 publications, 3.37%
|
|
Baylor College of Medicine
12 publications, 3.37%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
11 publications, 3.09%
|
|
University of Sydney
11 publications, 3.09%
|
|
Stanford University
11 publications, 3.09%
|
|
University Medical Center Utrecht
11 publications, 3.09%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
11 publications, 3.09%
|
|
Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego
11 publications, 3.09%
|
|
University of New South Wales
9 publications, 2.53%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
9 publications, 2.53%
|
|
Boston Children's Hospital
9 publications, 2.53%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
8 publications, 2.25%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
8 publications, 2.25%
|
|
Brigham and Women's Hospital
8 publications, 2.25%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
8 publications, 2.25%
|
|
University of Michigan
8 publications, 2.25%
|
|
National Human Genome Research Institute
8 publications, 2.25%
|
|
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
7 publications, 1.97%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
7 publications, 1.97%
|
|
University of Cambridge
7 publications, 1.97%
|
|
King's College London
7 publications, 1.97%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
7 publications, 1.97%
|
|
University of Queensland
7 publications, 1.97%
|
|
University Medical Center Groningen
7 publications, 1.97%
|
|
Amsterdam University Medical Center
7 publications, 1.97%
|
|
Zhejiang University
6 publications, 1.69%
|
|
Fudan University
6 publications, 1.69%
|
|
Sidra Medical and Research Center
6 publications, 1.69%
|
|
Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven
6 publications, 1.69%
|
|
Imperial College London
6 publications, 1.69%
|
|
University College London
6 publications, 1.69%
|
|
Cornell University
6 publications, 1.69%
|
|
Garvan Institute of Medical Research
6 publications, 1.69%
|
|
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
6 publications, 1.69%
|
|
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
6 publications, 1.69%
|
|
Columbia University
6 publications, 1.69%
|
|
Chinese University of Hong Kong
6 publications, 1.69%
|
|
University of Hong Kong
6 publications, 1.69%
|
|
University of Washington
6 publications, 1.69%
|
|
University of British Columbia
6 publications, 1.69%
|
|
Leiden University Medical Center
6 publications, 1.69%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
6 publications, 1.69%
|
|
Emory University
6 publications, 1.69%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
5 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Peking University
5 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Karolinska University Hospital
5 publications, 1.4%
|
|
University of Milan
5 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Oslo University Hospital
5 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne
5 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
5 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
5 publications, 1.4%
|
|
McGill University
5 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
5 publications, 1.4%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
5 publications, 1.4%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
5 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Western University
5 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Cleveland Clinic
5 publications, 1.4%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
5 publications, 1.4%
|
|
University of Utah
5 publications, 1.4%
|
|
Toronto General Hospital
5 publications, 1.4%
|
|
University of Tübingen
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Université Catholique de Louvain
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
University of Manchester
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
National University of Singapore
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
National Taiwan University Hospital
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Monash University
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
University of Adelaide
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Macquarie University
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Seoul National University
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Seoul National University Hospital
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Duke University
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Ohio State University
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Wenzhou Medical University
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Autonomous University of Madrid
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
University of Minnesota
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Cardiff University
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
University of Granada
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Indiana University School of Medicine
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Nationwide Children's Hospital
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Texas Children's Hospital
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
4 publications, 1.12%
|
|
King Abdulaziz University
3 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Quaid-i-Azam University
3 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
3 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
3 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
USA
|
USA, 232, 46.77%
USA
232 publications, 46.77%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 76, 15.32%
Canada
76 publications, 15.32%
|
China
|
China, 74, 14.92%
China
74 publications, 14.92%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 67, 13.51%
United Kingdom
67 publications, 13.51%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 47, 9.48%
Australia
47 publications, 9.48%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 30, 6.05%
Netherlands
30 publications, 6.05%
|
France
|
France, 29, 5.85%
France
29 publications, 5.85%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 28, 5.65%
Spain
28 publications, 5.65%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 27, 5.44%
Germany
27 publications, 5.44%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 20, 4.03%
Sweden
20 publications, 4.03%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 17, 3.43%
Belgium
17 publications, 3.43%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 16, 3.23%
Switzerland
16 publications, 3.23%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 14, 2.82%
Singapore
14 publications, 2.82%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 13, 2.62%
Italy
13 publications, 2.62%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 13, 2.62%
Japan
13 publications, 2.62%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 12, 2.42%
Saudi Arabia
12 publications, 2.42%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 11, 2.22%
Israel
11 publications, 2.22%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 11, 2.22%
Norway
11 publications, 2.22%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 10, 2.02%
Denmark
10 publications, 2.02%
|
India
|
India, 9, 1.81%
India
9 publications, 1.81%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 9, 1.81%
Republic of Korea
9 publications, 1.81%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 8, 1.61%
Russia
8 publications, 1.61%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 7, 1.41%
Brazil
7 publications, 1.41%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 7, 1.41%
Ireland
7 publications, 1.41%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 6, 1.21%
Qatar
6 publications, 1.21%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 5, 1.01%
Pakistan
5 publications, 1.01%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 5, 1.01%
Finland
5 publications, 1.01%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 4, 0.81%
Estonia
4 publications, 0.81%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 4, 0.81%
Portugal
4 publications, 0.81%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 4, 0.81%
Iran
4 publications, 0.81%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 4, 0.81%
South Africa
4 publications, 0.81%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 3, 0.6%
Austria
3 publications, 0.6%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 3, 0.6%
Egypt
3 publications, 0.6%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 3, 0.6%
Malaysia
3 publications, 0.6%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 3, 0.6%
New Zealand
3 publications, 0.6%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 3, 0.6%
UAE
3 publications, 0.6%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 3, 0.6%
Chile
3 publications, 0.6%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 2, 0.4%
Argentina
2 publications, 0.4%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 2, 0.4%
Indonesia
2 publications, 0.4%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 2, 0.4%
Thailand
2 publications, 0.4%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 0.4%
Turkey
2 publications, 0.4%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 2, 0.4%
Uganda
2 publications, 0.4%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.2%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 1, 0.2%
Botswana
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 1, 0.2%
Brunei
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Guatemala
|
Guatemala, 1, 0.2%
Guatemala
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Grenada
|
Grenada, 1, 0.2%
Grenada
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.2%
Greece
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.2%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 1, 0.2%
Iceland
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.2%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 1, 0.2%
Costa Rica
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 1, 0.2%
Latvia
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.2%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.2%
Peru
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.2%
Poland
1 publication, 0.2%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 1, 0.2%
North Macedonia
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Senegal
|
Senegal, 1, 0.2%
Senegal
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.2%
Tunisia
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.2%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Faroe Islands
|
Faroe Islands, 1, 0.2%
Faroe Islands
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.2%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.2%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.2%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Show all (34 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
|
USA
|
USA, 154, 43.26%
USA
154 publications, 43.26%
|
China
|
China, 62, 17.42%
China
62 publications, 17.42%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 49, 13.76%
Canada
49 publications, 13.76%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 45, 12.64%
United Kingdom
45 publications, 12.64%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 30, 8.43%
Australia
30 publications, 8.43%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 25, 7.02%
Netherlands
25 publications, 7.02%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 24, 6.74%
Germany
24 publications, 6.74%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 23, 6.46%
Spain
23 publications, 6.46%
|
France
|
France, 15, 4.21%
France
15 publications, 4.21%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 15, 4.21%
Belgium
15 publications, 4.21%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 15, 4.21%
Switzerland
15 publications, 4.21%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 14, 3.93%
Sweden
14 publications, 3.93%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 12, 3.37%
Italy
12 publications, 3.37%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 10, 2.81%
Israel
10 publications, 2.81%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 10, 2.81%
Japan
10 publications, 2.81%
|
India
|
India, 8, 2.25%
India
8 publications, 2.25%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 8, 2.25%
Norway
8 publications, 2.25%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 7, 1.97%
Republic of Korea
7 publications, 1.97%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 7, 1.97%
Singapore
7 publications, 1.97%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 6, 1.69%
Qatar
6 publications, 1.69%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 5, 1.4%
Russia
5 publications, 1.4%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 5, 1.4%
Ireland
5 publications, 1.4%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 5, 1.4%
Pakistan
5 publications, 1.4%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 5, 1.4%
Saudi Arabia
5 publications, 1.4%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 4, 1.12%
Portugal
4 publications, 1.12%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 4, 1.12%
Denmark
4 publications, 1.12%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 4, 1.12%
South Africa
4 publications, 1.12%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 3, 0.84%
Estonia
3 publications, 0.84%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 3, 0.84%
Brazil
3 publications, 0.84%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 3, 0.84%
Egypt
3 publications, 0.84%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 3, 0.84%
Iran
3 publications, 0.84%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 3, 0.84%
Chile
3 publications, 0.84%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 0.56%
Austria
2 publications, 0.56%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 2, 0.56%
Argentina
2 publications, 0.56%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 2, 0.56%
Indonesia
2 publications, 0.56%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 2, 0.56%
Malaysia
2 publications, 0.56%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 2, 0.56%
Thailand
2 publications, 0.56%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 0.56%
Turkey
2 publications, 0.56%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 2, 0.56%
Uganda
2 publications, 0.56%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 2, 0.56%
Finland
2 publications, 0.56%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.28%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 1, 0.28%
Botswana
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Guatemala
|
Guatemala, 1, 0.28%
Guatemala
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Grenada
|
Grenada, 1, 0.28%
Grenada
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.28%
Greece
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.28%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.28%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 1, 0.28%
Costa Rica
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 1, 0.28%
Latvia
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.28%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.28%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.28%
UAE
1 publication, 0.28%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 1, 0.28%
North Macedonia
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.28%
Tunisia
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.28%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.28%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.28%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.28%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Show all (27 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
2 profile journal articles
Filatova Alexandra
34 publications,
238 citations
h-index: 8
1 profile journal article
Chew Emily

National Eye Institute
605 publications,
67 193 citations
h-index: 99