Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q4
WOS
Q3
Impact factor
0.5
SJR
0.127
CiteScore
0.5
Categories
Law
Areas
Social Sciences
Years of issue
1980, 1985, 1987-2004, 2006-2025
journal names
Arab Law Quarterly
ARAB LAW Q
Top-3 citing journals

SSRN Electronic Journal
(94 citations)

Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research
(28 citations)
Top-3 organizations

International Islamic University Malaysia
(27 publications)

Al Ain University
(16 publications)

Qatar University
(16 publications)

Al Ain University
(10 publications)

Qatar University
(10 publications)

United Arab Emirates University
(5 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 2492
Q1

The Stochastic Dynamic Postdisaster Inventory Allocation Problem with Trucks and UAVs
van Steenbergen R.M., van Heeswijk W.J., Mes M.R.
Humanitarian logistics operations face increasing difficulties due to rising demands for aid in disaster areas. This paper investigates the dynamic allocation of scarce relief supplies across multiple affected districts over time. It introduces a novel stochastic dynamic postdisaster inventory allocation problem (SDPDIAP) with trucks and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) delivering relief goods under uncertain supply and demand. The relevance of this humanitarian logistics problem lies in the importance of considering the intertemporal social impact of deliveries. We achieve this by considering social costs (transportation and deprivation costs) when allocating scarce supplies. Furthermore, we consider the inherent uncertainties of disaster areas and the potential use of cargo UAVs to enhance operational efficiency. This study proposes two anticipatory solution methods based on approximate dynamic programming, specifically decomposed linear value function approximation (DL-VFA) and neural network value function approximation (NN-VFA) to effectively manage uncertainties in the dynamic allocation process. We compare DL-VFA and NN-VFA with various state-of-the-art methods (e.g., exact reoptimization and proximal policy optimization) and results show a 6%–8% improvement compared with the best benchmarks. NN-VFA provides the best performance and captures nonlinearities in the problem, whereas DL-VFA shows excellent scalability against a minor performance loss. From a practical standpoint, the experiments reveal that consideration of social costs results in improved allocation of scarce supplies both across affected districts and over time. Finally, results show that deploying UAVs can play a crucial role in the allocation of relief goods, especially in the first stages after a disaster. The use of UAVs reduces transportation and deprivation costs together by 16%–20% and reduces maximum deprivation times by 19%–40% while maintaining similar levels of demand coverage, showcasing efficient and effective operations. History: This paper has been accepted for the Transportation Science Special Issue on TSL Conference 2023.
Q1

Solving the Real-Time Train Dispatching Problem by Column Generation
Schälicke M., Nachtigall K.
Disruptions in the operational flow of rail traffic can lead to conflicts between train movements, making it impossible to adhere to the scheduled timetable. This is when dispatching comes into play: resolving existing conflicts and providing a revised timetable. In this process, train paths are adjusted in their spatial and temporal dimensions. This adjustment is known as the train dispatching problem (TDP), which involves selecting conflict-free train paths with minimal delay. Starting from a path-oriented formulation of the TDP, a binary linear decision model is introduced. For each possible train path, a binary decision variable indicates whether the path is utilized by a train. Each train path is constructed from a set of predefined path segments within a time–space network. Instead of modeling pairwise conflicts, stronger linear programming formulations are achieved by defining cliques over the complete train paths. The combinatorial nature of the path segments results in a large number of possible paths, necessitating the use of the column-generation method. Within the subproblem, the shadow prices of conflict cliques must be considered. When constructing a new train path, it must be determined whether it belongs to a clique. This issue is addressed using a mixed integer program. The methodology is tested on instances from a dispatching area in Germany. Numerical results show that the presented method achieves acceptable computation times and good solution quality, meeting the requirements for real-time dispatching.
Q1

Estimating Erratic Measurement Errors in Network-Wide Traffic Flow via Virtual Balance Sensors
Zheng Z., Wang Z., Fu H., Ma W.
Large-scale traffic flow data are collected by numerous sensors for managing and operating transport systems. However, various measurement errors exist in the sensor data and their distributions or structures are usually not known in the real world, which diminishes the reliability of the collected data and impairs the performance of smart mobility applications. Such irregular error is referred to as the erratic measurement error and has not been well investigated in existing studies. In this research, we propose to estimate the erratic measurement errors in networked traffic flow data. Different from existing studies that mainly focus on measurement errors with known distributions or structures, we allow the distributions and structures of measurement errors to be unknown except that measurement errors occur based on a Poisson process. By exploiting the flow balance law, we first introduce the concept of virtual balance sensors and develop a mixed integer nonlinear programming model to simultaneously estimate sensor error probabilities and recover traffic flow. Under suitable assumptions, the complex integrated problem can be equivalently viewed as an estimate-then-optimize problem: first, estimation using machine learning (ML) methods, and then optimization with mathematical programming. When the assumptions fail in more realistic scenarios, we further develop a smart estimate-then-optimize (SEO) framework that embeds the optimization model into ML training loops to solve the problem. Compared with the two-stage method, the SEO framework ensures that the optimization process can recognize and compensate for inaccurate estimations caused by ML methods, which can produce more reliable results. Finally, we conduct numerical experiments using both synthetic and real-world examples under various scenarios. Results demonstrate the effectiveness of our decomposition approach and the superiority of the SEO framework. History: This paper has been accepted for the Transportation Science Special Issue on Machine Learning Methods for Urban Mobility. Funding: The work described in this paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant Project No. 72288101, 72101012, 72301023] and a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [Grant Project No. PolyU/15206322]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2023.0493 .
Q1

Exact Two-Step Benders Decomposition for the Time Window Assignment Traveling Salesperson Problem
Çelik Ş., Martin L., Schrotenboer A.H., Van Woensel T.
Next-day delivery logistics services are redefining the industry by increasingly focusing on customer service. Each logistics service provider’s challenge is jointly optimizing time window assignment and vehicle routing for such next-day delivery services. To do so in a cost-efficient and customer-centric fashion, real-life uncertainty, such as stochastic travel times, needs to be incorporated into the optimization process. This paper focuses on the canonical optimization problem within this context: the time window assignment traveling salesperson problem with stochastic travel times (TWATSP-ST). It belongs to two-stage, stochastic, mixed-integer programming problems with continuous recourse. We introduce two-step Benders decomposition with scenario clustering (TBDS) as an exact solution methodology for solving such stochastic programs. The method utilizes a new two-step decomposition along the binary and continuous first stage decisions and introduces a new scenario-retention strategy that combines and generalizes state-of-the-art Benders approaches and scenario-clustering techniques. Extensive experiments show that TBDS is superior to state-of-the-art approaches in the literature. It solves TWATSP-ST instances with up to 25 customers to optimality. It provides better lower and upper bounds that lead to faster convergence than existing state-of-the-art methods. We use TBDS to analyze the structure of the optimal solutions. By increasing routing costs only slightly, customer service can be improved tremendously driven by smartly alternating between high- and low-variance travel arcs to reduce the impact of delay propagation throughout the executed vehicle route. Funding: A. H. Schrotenboer has received support from the Dutch Science Foundation [Grant VI.Veni.211E.043]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2024.0750 .
Q1

Modeling Metro Passenger Routing Choices with a Fully Differentiable End-to-End Simulation-Based Optimization (SBO) Approach
Du K., Lee E., Ma Q., Su Z., Zhang S., Lo H.K.
Metro systems in densely populated urban areas are often complicated, with some origin-destinations (OD) having multiple routes with similar travel times, leading to complex passenger routing behaviors. To improve modeling and calibration, this paper proposes a novel passenger route choice model with a metro simulator that accounts for passenger flows, queueing, congestion, and transfer delays. A novel, data-driven approach that utilizes a fully differentiable end-to-end simulation-based optimization (SBO) framework is proposed to calibrate the model, with the gradients calculated automatically and analytically using the iterative backpropagation (IB) algorithm. The SBO framework integrates data from multiple sources, including smart card data and train loadings, to calibrate the route choice parameters that best match the observed data. The full differentiability of the proposed framework enables it to calibrate for more than 20,000 passenger route choice ratios, covering every OD pair. To further improve the efficiency of the framework, a matrix-based optimization (MBO) mechanism is proposed, which provides better initial values for the SBO and ensures high efficiency with large datasets. A hybrid optimization algorithm combining MBO and SBO effectively calibrates the model, demonstrating high accuracy with synthetic data from actual passenger OD demands, where hypothesis tests are conducted for accuracies and significances. The accuracies and robustness are validated by experiments with synthetic passenger flow data, offering potential for optimizing passenger flow management in densely populated urban metro systems. Then, the SBO framework is extended for user equilibrium formulations with a crowding-aware route choice model and iterative metro simulations, calibrated by the hybrid optimization algorithm with additional matrix operations. Case studies with actual observed passenger flows are conducted to illustrate the proposed framework with multiple setups, exhibiting the heterogeneity of passenger route choice preferences and providing insights for operation management in the Hong Kong Mass Transit Railway system. History: This paper has been accepted for the Transportation Science Special Issue on Machine Learning Methods for Urban Mobility. Funding: This work was supported by the General Research Fund of the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [Grant 16219224], the Key Research and Development Program of Hubei Province [Grant 2023BAB076], and the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72001162]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2024.0557 .
Q1

2024 Transportation Science Meritorious Service Awards
We are pleased to announce the recipients of the Transportation Science Meritorious Service Awards. These awards recognize associate editors, special issue guest editors, and reviewers who have offered exceptional service in the review process. We truly appreciate all the efforts of the many volunteers who provide invaluable service to the journal. The 2024 recipients have distinguished themselves by the number of papers handled, their efficiency in handling papers, and the quality of their reviews.
Q1

Dynamic Robot Routing and Destination Assignment Policies for Robotic Sorting Systems
Fang Y., De Koster R., Roy D., Yu Y.
Robotic sorting systems (RSSs) use mobile robots to sort items by destination. An RSS pairs high accuracy and flexible capacity sorting with the advantages of a flexible layout. This is why several express parcel and e-commerce retail companies, who face heavy demand fluctuations, have implemented these systems. To cope with fluctuating demand, temporal robot congestion, and high sorting speed requirements, workload balancing strategies such as dynamic robot routing and destination reassignment may be of benefit. We investigate the effect of a dynamic robot routing policy using a Markov decision process (MDP) model and dynamic destination assignment using a mixed integer programming (MIP) model. To obtain the MDP model parameters, we first model the system as a semiopen queuing network (SOQN) that accounts for robot movement dynamics and network congestion. Then, we construct the MIP model to find a destination reassignment scheme that minimizes the workload imbalance. With inputs from the SOQN and MIP models, the Markov decision process minimizes parcel waiting and postponement costs and helps to find a good heuristic robot routing policy to reduce congestion. We show that the heuristic dynamic routing policy is near optimal in small-scale systems and outperforms benchmark policies in large-scale realistic scenarios. Dynamic destination reassignment also has positive effects on the throughput capacity in highly loaded systems. Together, in our case company, they improve the throughput capacity by 35%. Simultaneously, the effect of dynamic routing exceeds that of dynamic destination reassignment, suggesting that managers should focus more on dynamic robot routing than dynamic destination reassignment to mitigate temporal congestion. Funding: This work was supported by The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [Grant WK2040000094] and the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 71921001 and 72091215/72091210]. Supplemental Material: The online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2023.0458 .
Q1

Multimodal Transportation Pricing Alliance Design: Large-Scale Optimization for Rapid Gains
Cummings K., Vaze V., Ergun Ö., Barnhart C.
Transit agencies have the opportunity to outsource certain services to established mobility-on-demand (MOD) providers. Such alliances can improve service quality, coverage, and ridership; reduce public sector costs and vehicular emissions; and integrate the passenger experience. To amplify the effectiveness of such alliances, we develop a fare-setting model that jointly optimizes fares and discounts across a multimodal network. We capture commuters’ travel decisions with a discrete choice model, resulting in a large-scale, mixed-integer, nonconvex optimization problem. To solve this challenging problem, we develop a two-stage decomposition with the pricing decisions in the first stage and a mixed-integer linear optimization of fare discounts and passengers’ travel decisions in the second stage. To solve the decomposition, we develop a new solution approach that combines customized coordinate descent, parsimonious second-stage evaluations, and interpolations using special ordered sets. This approach, enhanced by acceleration techniques based on slanted traversal, randomization, and warm-start, significantly outperforms algorithmic benchmarks. Different alliance priorities result in qualitatively different fare designs: flat fares decrease the total vehicle-miles traveled, whereas geographically informed discounts improve passenger happiness. The model responds appropriately to equity-oriented and passenger-centric priorities, improving system utilization and lowering prices for low-income and long-distance commuters. Our profit allocation mechanism improves the outcomes for both types of operators, thus incentivizing profit-oriented MOD operators to adopt transit priorities. Funding: This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation [Grants 1122374 and 1750587]. Supplemental Material: The online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2023.0009 .
Q1

Designing the Liner Shipping Network of Tomorrow Powered by Alternative Fuels
Johansen M.L., Holst K.K., Ropke S.
The liner shipping industry is undergoing an extensive decarbonization process to reduce its 275 million tons of CO2 emissions as of 2018. In this process, the long-term solution is the introduction of new alternative maritime fuels. The introduction of alternative fuels presents a great set of unknowns. Among these are the strategic concerns regarding sourcing of alternative fuels and, operationally, how the new fuels might affect the network of shipping routes. We propose a problem formulation that integrates fuel supply/demand into the liner shipping network design problem. Here, we present a model to determine the production sites and distribution of new alternative fuels—we consider methanol and ammonia. For the network design problem, we apply an adaptive large neighborhood search combined with a delayed column generation process. In addition, we wish to test the effect of designing a robust network under uncertain demand conditions because of the problem’s strategic nature and importance. Therefore, our proposed solution method will have a deterministic and stochastic setup when we apply it to the second-largest multihub instance, WorldSmall, known from LINER-LIB. In the deterministic setting, our proposed solution method finds a new best solution to three instances from LINER-LIB. For the main considered WorldSmall instance, we even noticed a new best solution in all our tested fuel settings. In addition, we note a profit drop of 7.2% between a bunker-powered and pure alternative fuel–powered network. The selected alternative fuel production sites favor a proximity to European ports and have a heavy reliance on wind turbines. The stochastic results clearly showed that the found networks were much more resilient to the demand changes. Neglecting the perspective of uncertain demand leads to highly fluctuating profits. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2023.0143 .
Q1

A Two-Stage Iteration Method for Solving the Departure Time Choice Problem
Guo R., Yang H., Huang H.
We discuss the numerical solution of the departure time choice problem. The non–quasi-monotone of the travel cost vector function is first proved to address the study motivation. A two-stage iteration method is then proposed to effectively solve the problem in a single origin-destination (OD) pair network with parallel links, in which departure time and route choices of commuters are involved. We analytically reveal why the iteration method can solve the problem and theoretically prove the convergence, that is, the iteration process finally achieves at a user equilibrium (UE) state. The iteration method is then extended to a single link network with heterogeneous users in the values of travel time and schedule delay and the preferred arrival time. Furthermore, numerical analyses are conducted for the two networks to demonstrate the effectiveness of the iteration method for solving the departure time choice problem. Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 72288101, 72171007, and 72021001]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2024.0599 .
Q1

The Restaurant Meal Delivery Problem with Ghost Kitchens
Neria G., Hildebrandt F.D., Tzur M., Ulmer M.W.
Restaurant meal delivery has been rapidly growing in the last few years. The main operational challenges are the temporally and spatially dispersed stochastic demand that arrives from customers all over town as well as the customers’ expectation of timely and fresh delivery. To overcome these challenges, a new business concept emerged: ghost kitchens. This concept proposes synchronized food preparation of several restaurants in a central facility. Ghost kitchens can bring several advantages, such as fresher food because of the synchronization of food preparation and delivery and less delay because of the consolidated delivery of orders. Exploiting these advantages requires effective operational strategies for the dynamic scheduling of food preparation and delivery. The goal of this paper is providing these strategies and investigating the value of ghost kitchens. We model the problem as a sequential decision process. For the complex decision space of scheduling order preparations, consolidating orders to trips, and scheduling trip departures, we propose a large neighborhood search (LNS) procedure based on partial decisions and driven by analytical properties. Within the LNS, decisions are evaluated via a value function approximation, enabling anticipatory and real-time decision making. In a comprehensive computational study, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our method compared with benchmark policies and highlight the advantages of ghost kitchens compared with conventional meal delivery. Funding: G. Neria’s research is partially supported by the Israeli Smart Transportation Research Center, the Council for Higher Education in Israel, and the Shlomo Shmeltzer Institute for Smart Transportation at Tel Aviv University. F. D. Hildebrandt’s research is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) German Research Foundation [Grant 413322447]. M. Tzur’s research is partially supported by the Israeli Smart Transportation Research Center. M. W. Ulmer’s work is funded by the DFG Emmy Noether Programme [Grant 444657906]. We gratefully acknowledge their support. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2024.0510 .
Q1

Multiday User Equilibrium with Strategic Commuters
Wu M., Yin Y., Lynch J.P.
In the era of connected and automated mobility, commuters possess strong computation power, enabling them to strategically make sequential travel choices over a planning horizon. This paper investigates the multiday traffic patterns that arise from such decision-making behavior. In doing so, we frame the commute problem as a mean-field Markov game and introduce a novel concept of multiday user equilibrium to capture the steady state of commuters’ interactions. The proposed model is general and can be tailored to various travel choices, such as route or departure time. We explore a range of properties of the multiday user equilibrium under mild conditions. The study reveals the fingerprint of user inertia on network flow patterns, causing between-day variations even at a steady state. Furthermore, our analysis establishes critical connections between the multiday user equilibrium and conventional Wardrop equilibrium. Funding: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation [Grants CMMI-1854684, CMMI-1904575, CMMI-2233057, and CMMI-2240981]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2023.0488 .
Q1

On the Concept of Opportunity Cost in Integrated Demand Management and Vehicle Routing
Fleckenstein D., Klein R., Klein V., Steinhardt C.
Integrated demand management and vehicle routing problems are characterized by a stream of customers arriving dynamically over a booking horizon and requesting logistical services, fulfilled by a given fleet of vehicles during a service horizon. Prominent examples are attended home delivery and same-day delivery problems, where customers commonly have heterogeneous preferences regarding service fulfillment and requests differ in profitability. Thus, demand management methods are applied to steer the booking process to maximize total profit considering the cost of the routing decisions for the resulting orders. To measure the requests’ profitability for any demand management method, it is common to estimate their opportunity cost. In the context of integrated demand management and vehicle routing problems, this estimation differs substantially from the estimation in the well-examined demand management problems of traditional revenue management applications as, for example, found in the airline or car rental industry. This is because of the unique interrelation of demand control decisions and vehicle routing decisions as it inhibits a clear quantification and attribution of cost, and of displaced revenue, to certain customer requests. In this paper, we extend the theoretical foundation of opportunity cost in integrated demand management and vehicle routing problems. By defining and analyzing a generic Markov decision process model, we formally derive a definition of opportunity cost and prove opportunity cost properties on a general level. Hence, our findings are valid for a wide range of specific problems. Further, based on these theoretical findings, we propose approximation approaches that have not yet been applied in the existing literature, and evaluate their potential in a computational study. Thereby, we provide evidence that the theoretical results can be practically exploited in the development of solution algorithms. Funding: This work was supported by the University of the Bundeswehr Munich. Supplemental Material: The online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2024.0644 .
Q1

A 0,1 Linear Programming Approach to Deadlock Detection and Management in Railways
Dal Sasso V., Lamorgese L., Mannino C., Onofri A., Ventura P.
In railway systems, a deadlock occurs when trains accidentally occupy positions that prevent each other from moving forward. Although deadlocks are rare events, they do occur from time to time, requiring costly recourse actions and generating significant knock-on delays. In this paper, we present a noncompact 0,1 linear programming formulation and a methodology for discovering (possibly future) deadlocks and the subsequent implementation of optimal recovery measures. The approach is implemented in a tool to dispatch trains in real time developed in cooperation with Union Pacific (UP) and currently in operations on the entire UP network. Funding: This work was partially funded by Europe’s Rail, Flagship Project MOTIONAL [Action Horizon JU Innovation, Project 101101973]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2024.0521 .
Q1

Pricing and Demand Management for Integrated Same-Day and Next-Day Delivery Systems
Banerjee D., Erera A.L., Toriello A.
We study a system in which a common delivery fleet provides service to both same-day delivery (SDD) and next-day delivery (NDD) orders placed by e-retail customers who are sensitive to delivery prices. We develop a model of the system and optimize with respect to two separate objectives. First, empirical research suggests that fulfilling e-retail orders ahead of promised delivery days increases a firm’s long-run market share. Motivated by this phenomenon, we optimize for customer satisfaction by maximizing the quantity of NDD orders fulfilled one day early given fixed prices. Next, we optimize for total profit; we optimize for a single SDD price, and we then set SDD prices in a two-level scheme with discounts for early-ordering customers. Our analysis relies on continuous approximation techniques to capture the interplay between NDD and SDD orders and particularly the effect one day’s operations have on the next, a novel modeling component not present in SDD-only models; a key technical result is establishing the model’s convergence to a steady state using dynamical systems theory. We derive structural insights and efficient algorithms for both objectives. In particular, we show that, under certain conditions, the total profit is a piecewise-convex function with polynomially many breakpoints that can be efficiently enumerated. In a case study set in metropolitan Denver, Colorado, approximately 10% of NDD orders can be fulfilled one day early at optimality, and profit is increased by 1% to 3% in a two-level pricing scheme versus a one-level scheme. We conduct operational simulations for validation of solutions and analysis of initial conditions. History: This paper has been accepted for the Transportation Science Special Issue on TSL Conference 2023. Funding: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation [Grant DGE-1650044]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2023.0381 .
Top-100
Citing journals
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
94 citations, 5.9%
|
|
International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management
34 citations, 2.13%
|
|
Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research
28 citations, 1.76%
|
|
International Journal of Law and Management
25 citations, 1.57%
|
|
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
25 citations, 1.57%
|
|
Heliyon
18 citations, 1.13%
|
|
Religions
17 citations, 1.07%
|
|
Qualitative Research in Financial Markets
15 citations, 0.94%
|
|
Sustainability
14 citations, 0.88%
|
|
ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance
13 citations, 0.82%
|
|
Journal of Islamic Marketing
12 citations, 0.75%
|
|
Journal of International Trade Law and Policy
10 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Handbook of Research on In-Country Determinants and Implications of Foreign Land Acquisitions
9 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Contemporary Arab Affairs
8 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Thunderbird International Business Review
8 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Journal of Governance and Regulation
7 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Leiden Journal of International Law
6 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Journal not defined
6 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance
6 citations, 0.38%
|
|
European Business Organization Law Review
6 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Conflict Resolution Quarterly
6 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Revue des Mondes Musulmans et de la Mediterranee
6 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Islamic Economic Studies
6 citations, 0.38%
|
|
European Journal of Law and Economics
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Asian Journal of Comparative Law
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Religion Compass
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Borsa Istanbul Review
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Research in International Business and Finance
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
مجلة جامعة الشارقة للعلوم القانونية
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Journal of Law and Religion
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Corporate Law Studies
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Public Integrity
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
International Journal of Ethics and Systems
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Politics and Religion
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Contemporary Islam
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Environment, Development and Sustainability
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
SAGE Open
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Law and Society
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Arabian Studies
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
New Perspectives on Turkey
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Studies in Religion-Sciences Religieuses
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
F1000Research
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Corporate Ownership and Control
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Advances in Human Services and Public Health
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Financial Crime
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Employee Relations
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Economic History Review
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Qur'anic Studies
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Education Sciences
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Banks and Bank Systems
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Cogent Economics and Finance
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Hawwa
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Banking Regulation
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Religion and Health
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Global Jurist
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
International and Comparative Law Quarterly
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Politics and Policy
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Telecommunications Policy
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Service Industries Journal
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Meditteranean Politics
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Liverpool Law Review
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Pacific Basin Finance Journal
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
International Journal of Disclosure and Governance
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
SpringerPlus
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Risk and Financial Management
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Chroniques yéménites
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Law and Sustainable Development
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies (2147-4486)
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
The Law and Development Review
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Review of Economics and Finance
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Corporate Finance
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Near Eastern Studies
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Organization
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Managerial Finance
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Middle East Critique
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Journal of Emerging Markets
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Iranian Studies
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Rigakuryoho Kagaku
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Area
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Industrial Marketing Management
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Journal of Leadership in Education
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
American Journal of Comparative Law
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Critical Review
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Palestine Studies
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Human Rights Review
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Journal of Public Administration
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Money Laundering Control
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
Citing publishers
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
Emerald
221 citations, 13.86%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
162 citations, 10.16%
|
|
Springer Nature
114 citations, 7.15%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
105 citations, 6.59%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
92 citations, 5.77%
|
|
Elsevier
76 citations, 4.77%
|
|
Wiley
68 citations, 4.27%
|
|
MDPI
43 citations, 2.7%
|
|
SAGE
33 citations, 2.07%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
26 citations, 1.63%
|
|
IGI Global
18 citations, 1.13%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
16 citations, 1%
|
|
Brill
14 citations, 0.88%
|
|
OpenEdition
13 citations, 0.82%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
12 citations, 0.75%
|
|
University of California Press
8 citations, 0.5%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
7 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Oxford University Press
6 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Duke University Press
6 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Edisud Publishers
6 citations, 0.38%
|
|
AOSIS
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
University Of Sharjah - Scientific Publishing Unit
5 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Borsa Istanbul Anonim Sirketi
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
F1000 Research
4 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Edinburgh University Press
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Indiana University Press
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Gyandhara International Academic Publications
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Society of Petroleum Engineers
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
3 citations, 0.19%
|
|
World Scientific
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
EDP Sciences
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
American Society of Comparative Law
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Stockholm University Press
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
NP Voprosy Ekonomiki
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Annual Reviews
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
CAIRN
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Kutafin Moscow State Law University
2 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
MIT Press
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Noncommercial Partnership Editorial Board Polis
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
School of Economics and Business in Sarajevo
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
IOP Publishing
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Unisa Press
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Faculty of Sociel Sciences, Charles Universtiy
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Thomas Telford
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
PERSEE Program
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
EJournal Publishing
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Perm State University (PSU)
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Granthaalayah Publications and Printers
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Japanese Society of Animal Science
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Berghahn Books
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Equinox Publishing
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Japan Association for Quaternary Research
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Russian Islamic Institute
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Hacettepe Hukuk Fakultesi Dergisi
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Hacettepe University Journal of Turkish Studies
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Japan Chapter of International Geosynthetics Society
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Pamukkale Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
AMO Publisher
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Japanese Society of Insurance Science
1 citation, 0.06%
|
|
Show all (43 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
|
International Islamic University Malaysia
27 publications, 1.85%
|
|
Al Ain University
16 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Qatar University
16 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Yarmouk University
13 publications, 0.89%
|
|
University of Jordan
12 publications, 0.82%
|
|
University of Sharjah
11 publications, 0.75%
|
|
United Arab Emirates University
9 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Al al-Bayt University
9 publications, 0.62%
|
|
University of Bahrain
8 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Kuwait University
8 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Durham University
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Brunel University London
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Glasgow Caledonian University
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
University of Leeds
6 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Zayed University
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Malaya
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
National University of Malaysia
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Sultan Qaboos University
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Alexandria University
5 publications, 0.34%
|
|
King Saud University
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Hashemite University
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Western Australia
4 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University
3 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Abu Dhabi University
3 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Basrah
3 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
3 publications, 0.21%
|
|
King's College London
3 publications, 0.21%
|
|
George Washington University
3 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Prince Sultan University
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Tehran
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Marmara University
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Lahore University of Management Sciences
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University Putra Malaysia
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Heidelberg University
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Islamic Science University of Malaysia
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Glasgow
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Uyo
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Strayer University
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Robert Gordon University
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Münster
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Sussex
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
German University in Cairo
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Manouba University
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Bangor University
2 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Institute for African Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Najran University
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
University of Jeddah
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Al Jouf University
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Saudi Electronic University
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Sharif University of Technology
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
British University in Dubai
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Ajman University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
University of Tabriz
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
COMSATS University Islamabad
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Quaid-i-Azam University
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Air University
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
International Islamic University, Islamabad
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Riphah International University
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Jamia Millia Islamia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Allameh Tabataba'i University
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
KTO Karatay University
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
University of Al-Qadisiyah
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
University of Kerbala
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Soran University
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Al-Iraqia University
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Hamad Bin Khalifa University
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Public Authority for Applied Education and Training
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
University of Twente
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
University of Science, Malaysia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
The MARA Technological University
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Taylor's University
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
University of Kuala Lumpur
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Al-Balqa Applied University
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
University of Zurich
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Australian National University
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Mutah University
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Philadelphia University
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Petra University
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
University College London
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
University of Dundee
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
University of Warwick
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
University of Oxford
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Holy Spirit University of Kaslik
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Lebanese American University
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Saint Joseph University
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
University of Oslo
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
National University of Singapore
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Cornell University
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Yale University
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
University of Tsukuba
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
University of Rome Tor Vergata
1 publication, 0.07%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
|
|
Al Ain University
10 publications, 6.21%
|
|
Qatar University
10 publications, 6.21%
|
|
United Arab Emirates University
5 publications, 3.11%
|
|
University of Jordan
5 publications, 3.11%
|
|
University of Sharjah
4 publications, 2.48%
|
|
Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University
3 publications, 1.86%
|
|
George Washington University
3 publications, 1.86%
|
|
Alexandria University
3 publications, 1.86%
|
|
Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University
2 publications, 1.24%
|
|
Zayed University
2 publications, 1.24%
|
|
Marmara University
2 publications, 1.24%
|
|
Lahore University of Management Sciences
2 publications, 1.24%
|
|
University of Bahrain
2 publications, 1.24%
|
|
Sultan Qaboos University
2 publications, 1.24%
|
|
King's College London
2 publications, 1.24%
|
|
University of Münster
2 publications, 1.24%
|
|
University of Sussex
2 publications, 1.24%
|
|
German University in Cairo
2 publications, 1.24%
|
|
Bangor University
2 publications, 1.24%
|
|
Najran University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Jeddah
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Al Jouf University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Saudi Electronic University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
British University in Dubai
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Ajman University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Tabriz
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Jamia Millia Islamia
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Allameh Tabataba'i University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
KTO Karatay University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Kerbala
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Soran University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Al-Iraqia University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Hamad Bin Khalifa University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Kuwait University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Twente
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Science, Malaysia
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
International Islamic University Malaysia
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Al-Balqa Applied University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Al al-Bayt University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Zurich
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Hashemite University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Mutah University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Yarmouk University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Petra University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University College London
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Durham University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Warwick
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Holy Spirit University of Kaslik
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Saint Joseph University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Oslo
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
National University of Singapore
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Cornell University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Yale University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Cairo University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Johannesburg
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Baze University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
American University in the Emirates
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Seattle University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Illinois at Chicago
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
George Mason University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Duke University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Harvard University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Newcastle University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
McGill University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Utrecht University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Leeds
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
IHE Delft Institute for Water Education
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Toronto
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Ottawa
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Tanta University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Cincinnati
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Wesleyan University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Manouba University
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
University of Westminster
1 publication, 0.62%
|
|
Show all (54 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
|
Publishing countries
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 64, 4.38%
United Kingdom
64 publications, 4.38%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 55, 3.77%
Malaysia
55 publications, 3.77%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 55, 3.77%
UAE
55 publications, 3.77%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 44, 3.01%
Jordan
44 publications, 3.01%
|
USA
|
USA, 35, 2.4%
USA
35 publications, 2.4%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 22, 1.51%
Saudi Arabia
22 publications, 1.51%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 18, 1.23%
Qatar
18 publications, 1.23%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 17, 1.16%
Egypt
17 publications, 1.16%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 17, 1.16%
Kuwait
17 publications, 1.16%
|
Palestine
|
Palestine, 12, 0.82%
Palestine
12 publications, 0.82%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 10, 0.68%
Bahrain
10 publications, 0.68%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 9, 0.62%
Germany
9 publications, 0.62%
|
France
|
France, 9, 0.62%
France
9 publications, 0.62%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 8, 0.55%
Iraq
8 publications, 0.55%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 8, 0.55%
Iran
8 publications, 0.55%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 7, 0.48%
Australia
7 publications, 0.48%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 7, 0.48%
Oman
7 publications, 0.48%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 7, 0.48%
Tunisia
7 publications, 0.48%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 4, 0.27%
Italy
4 publications, 0.27%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 4, 0.27%
Canada
4 publications, 0.27%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 4, 0.27%
Nigeria
4 publications, 0.27%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 4, 0.27%
Pakistan
4 publications, 0.27%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 4, 0.27%
Turkey
4 publications, 0.27%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 3, 0.21%
Netherlands
3 publications, 0.21%
|
Sudan
|
Sudan, 3, 0.21%
Sudan
3 publications, 0.21%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 2, 0.14%
Algeria
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 2, 0.14%
Belgium
2 publications, 0.14%
|
India
|
India, 2, 0.14%
India
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 0.14%
Ireland
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 2, 0.14%
Spain
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Yemen
|
Yemen, 2, 0.14%
Yemen
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 2, 0.14%
Lebanon
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 2, 0.14%
Morocco
2 publications, 0.14%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 2, 0.14%
New Zealand
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 2, 0.14%
Japan
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.07%
Russia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
China
|
China, 1, 0.07%
China
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1, 0.07%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 1, 0.07%
Brunei
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.07%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.07%
Norway
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.07%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Syria
|
Syria, 1, 0.07%
Syria
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Montenegro
|
Montenegro, 1, 0.07%
Montenegro
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 1, 0.07%
Switzerland
1 publication, 0.07%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.07%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Show all (16 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
|
|
UAE
|
UAE, 21, 13.04%
UAE
21 publications, 13.04%
|
USA
|
USA, 20, 12.42%
USA
20 publications, 12.42%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 17, 10.56%
United Kingdom
17 publications, 10.56%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 14, 8.7%
Jordan
14 publications, 8.7%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 11, 6.83%
Qatar
11 publications, 6.83%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 9, 5.59%
Egypt
9 publications, 5.59%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 9, 5.59%
Saudi Arabia
9 publications, 5.59%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 7, 4.35%
Germany
7 publications, 4.35%
|
Palestine
|
Palestine, 7, 4.35%
Palestine
7 publications, 4.35%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 5, 3.11%
Kuwait
5 publications, 3.11%
|
France
|
France, 4, 2.48%
France
4 publications, 2.48%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 4, 2.48%
Canada
4 publications, 2.48%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 4, 2.48%
Malaysia
4 publications, 2.48%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 4, 2.48%
Oman
4 publications, 2.48%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 3, 1.86%
Bahrain
3 publications, 1.86%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 3, 1.86%
Iraq
3 publications, 1.86%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 3, 1.86%
Iran
3 publications, 1.86%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 3, 1.86%
Netherlands
3 publications, 1.86%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 3, 1.86%
Tunisia
3 publications, 1.86%
|
India
|
India, 2, 1.24%
India
2 publications, 1.24%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 1.24%
Turkey
2 publications, 1.24%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.62%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.62%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 1, 0.62%
Spain
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 1, 0.62%
Italy
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.62%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.62%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 1, 0.62%
Nigeria
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.62%
Norway
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.62%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.62%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 1, 0.62%
Switzerland
1 publication, 0.62%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.62%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.62%
|
Show all (3 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
|
1 profile journal article
Jaffal Zeyad
10 publications,
3 citations
h-index: 1