Open Access
Annals of Coloproctology
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
3
SJR
0.481
CiteScore
3.3
Categories
Surgery
Gastroenterology
Areas
Medicine
Years of issue
2013-2023
journal names
Annals of Coloproctology
ANN COLOPROCTOL
Top-3 citing journals
Top-3 organizations

Yonsei University
(18 publications)

Seoul National University
(9 publications)

University of Ulsan
(9 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 560

Automated Detection of Hydrocephalus in Pediatric Head Computed Tomography Using VGG 16 CNN Deep Learning Architecture and Based Automated Segmentation Workflow for Ventricular Volume Estimation
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
Sekkat H., Khallouqi A., Rhazouani O.E., Halimi A.


Lumos: Software for Multi-level Multi-reader Comparison of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Late Gadolinium Enhancement Scar Quantification
Reisdorf P., Gavrysh J., Ammann C., Fenski M., Kolbitsch C., Lange S., Hennemuth A., Schulz-Menger J., Hadler T.
Abstract
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) offers state-of-the-art myocardial tissue differentiation. The CMR technique late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) currently provides the noninvasive gold standard for the detection of myocardial fibrosis. Typically, thresholding methods are used for fibrotic scar tissue quantification. A major challenge for standardized CMR assessment is large variations in the estimated scar for different methods. The aim was to improve quality assurance for LGE scar quantification, a multi-reader comparison tool “Lumos” was developed to support quality control for scar quantification methods. The thresholding methods and an exact rasterization approach were implemented, as well as a graphical user interface (GUI) with statistical and case-specific tabs. Twenty LGE cases were considered with half of them including artifacts and clinical results for eight scar quantification methods computed. Lumos was successfully implemented as a multi-level multi-reader comparison software, and differences between methods can be seen in the statistical results. Histograms visualize confounding effects of different methods. Connecting the statistical level with the case level allows for backtracking statistical differences to sources of differences in the threshold calculation. Being able to visualize the underlying groundwork for the different methods in the myocardial histogram gives the opportunity to identify causes for different thresholds. Lumos showed the differences in the clinical results between cases with artifacts and cases without artifacts. A video demonstration of Lumos is offered as supplementary material 1. Lumos allows for a multi-reader comparison for LGE scar quantification that offers insights into the origin of reader differences.

Radiology AI Lab: Evaluation of Radiology Applications with Clinical End-Users
Paalvast O., Sevenster M., Hertgers O., de Bliek H., Wijn V., Buil V., Knoester J., Vosbergen S., Lamb H.
Abstract
Despite the approval of over 200 artificial intelligence (AI) applications for radiology in the European Union, widespread adoption in clinical practice remains limited. Current assessments of AI applications often rely on post-hoc evaluations, lacking the granularity to capture real-time radiologist-AI interactions. The purpose of the study is to realise the Radiology AI lab for real-time, objective measurement of the impact of AI applications on radiologists’ workflows. We proposed the user-state sensing framework (USSF) to structure the sensing of radiologist-AI interactions in terms of personal, interactional, and contextual states. Guided by the USSF, a lab was established using three non-invasive biometric measurement techniques: eye-tracking, heart rate monitoring, and facial expression analysis. We conducted a pilot test with four radiologists of varying experience levels, who read ultra-low-dose (ULD) CT cases in (1) standard PACS and (2) manually annotated (to mimic AI) PACS workflows. Interpretation time, eye-tracking metrics, heart rate variability (HRV), and facial expressions were recorded and analysed. The Radiology AI lab was successfully realised as an initial physical iteration of the USSF at a tertiary referral centre. Radiologists participating in the pilot test read 32 ULDCT cases (mean age, 52 years ± 23 (SD); 17 male; 16 cases with abnormalities). Cases were read on average in 4.1 ± 2.2 min (standard PACS) and 3.9 ± 1.9 min (AI-annotated PACS), with no significant difference (p = 0.48). Three out of four radiologists showed significant shifts (p < 0.02) in eye-tracking metrics, including saccade duration, saccade quantity, fixation duration, fixation quantity, and pupil diameter, when using the AI-annotated workflow. These changes align with prior findings linking such metrics to increased competency and reduced cognitive load, suggesting a more efficient visual search strategy in AI-assisted interpretation. Although HRV metrics did not correlate with experience, when combined with facial expression analysis, they helped identify key moments during the pilot test. The Radiology AI lab was successfully realised, implementing personal, interactional, and contextual states of the user-state sensing framework, enabling objective analysis of radiologists’ workflows, and effectively capturing relevant biometrics. Future work will focus on expanding sensing of the contextual state of the user-state sensing framework, refining baseline determination, and continuing investigation of AI-enabled tools in radiology workflows.

Radiomics with Ultrasound Radiofrequency Data for Improving Evaluation of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
Yan D., Li Q., Chuang Y., Lin C., Shieh J., Weng W., Tsui P.


AI-Based 3D Liver Segmentation and Volumetric Analysis in Living Donor Data
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
Mun S.B., Choi S.T., Kim Y.J., Kim K.G., Lee W.S.


A Two-Stage Lightweight Deep Learning Framework for Mass Detection and Segmentation in Mammograms Using YOLOv5 and Depthwise SegNet
Manolakis D., Bizopoulos P., Lalas A., Votis K.
Abstract
Ensuring strict medical data privacy standards while delivering efficient and accurate breast cancer segmentation is a critical challenge. This paper addresses this challenge by proposing a lightweight solution capable of running directly in the user’s browser, ensuring that medical data never leave the user’s computer. Our proposed solution consists of a two-stage model: the pre-trained nano YoloV5 variation handles the task of mass detection, while a lightweight neural network model of just 20k parameters and an inference time of 21 ms per image addresses the segmentation problem. This highly efficient model in terms of inference speed and memory consumption was created by combining well-known techniques, such as the SegNet architecture and depthwise separable convolutions. The detection model manages an mAP@50 equal to 50.3% on the CBIS-DDSM dataset and 68.2% on the INbreast dataset. Despite its size, our segmentation model produces high-performance levels on the CBIS-DDSM (81.0% IoU, 89.4% Dice) and INbreast (77.3% IoU, 87.0% Dice) dataset.

Facilitating Radiograph Interpretation: Refined Generative Models for Precise Bone Suppression in Chest X-rays
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
Ibrahim S., Selim S., Elattar M.


SADiff: A Sinogram-Aware Diffusion Model for Low-Dose CT Image Denoising
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
Niknejad Mazandarani F., Babyn P., Alirezaie J.


I-BrainNet: Deep Learning and Internet of Things (DL/IoT)–Based Framework for the Classification of Brain Tumor
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
Ibrahim A.U., Engo G.M., Ame I., Nwekwo C.W., Al-Turjman F.


A Thyroid Nodule Ultrasound Image Grading Model Integrating Medical Prior Knowledge
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
Chen H., Liu C., Cheng X., Jiang C., Wang Y.


Robust Automatic Grading of Blunt Liver Trauma in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Using Label-Noise-Resistant Models
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
Zhang T., Li R., Zhong Z., Zhang X., Liu T., Zhou G., Lv F.


Subtraction of Temporally Sequential Digital Mammograms: Prediction and Localization of Near-Term Breast Cancer Occurrence
Loizidou K., Skouroumouni G., Savvidou G., Constantinidou A., Vlachou E.O., Yiallourou A., Pitris C., Nikolaou C.
Abstract
The objective is to predict a possible near-term occurrence of a breast mass after two consecutive screening rounds with normal mammograms. For the purposes of this study, conducted between 2020 and 2024, three consecutive rounds of mammograms were collected from 75 women, 46 to 79 years old. Successive screenings had an average interval of
$$\sim$$
∼
2 years. In each case, two mammographic views of each breast were collected, resulting in a dataset with a total of 450 images (3 × 2 × 75). The most recent mammogram was considered the “future” screening round and provided the location of a biopsy-confirmed malignant mass, serving as the ground truth for the training. The two normal previous mammograms (“prior” and “current”) were processed and a new subtracted image was created for the prediction. Region segmentation and post-processing were, then, applied, along with image feature extraction and selection. The selected features were incorporated into several classifiers and by applying leave-one-patient-out and k-fold cross-validation per patient, the regions of interest were characterized as benign or possible future malignancy. Study participants included 75 women (mean age, 62.5 ± 7.2; median age, 62 years). Feature selection from benign and possible future malignancy areas revealed that 14 features provided the best classification. The most accurate classification performance was achieved using ensemble voting, with 98.8% accuracy, 93.6% sensitivity, 98.8% specificity, and 0.96 AUC. Given the success of this algorithm, its clinical application could enable earlier diagnosis and improve prognosis for patients identified as at risk.

Landscape of 2D Deep Learning Segmentation Networks Applied to CT Scan from Lung Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
Mehrnia S.S., Safahi Z., Mousavi A., Panahandeh F., Farmani A., Yuan R., Rahmim A., Salmanpour M.R.


A Novel Pipeline for Adrenal Gland Segmentation: Integration of a Hybrid Post-Processing Technique with Deep Learning
Fayemiwo M., Gardiner B., Harkin J., McDaid L., Prakash P., Dennedy M.
Abstract
Accurate segmentation of adrenal glands from CT images is essential for enhancing computer-aided diagnosis and surgical planning. However, the small size, irregular shape, and proximity to surrounding tissues make this task highly challenging. This study introduces a novel pipeline that significantly improves the segmentation of left and right adrenal glands by integrating advanced pre-processing techniques and a robust post-processing framework. Utilising a 2D UNet architecture with various backbones (VGG16, ResNet34, InceptionV3), the pipeline leverages test-time augmentation (TTA) and targeted removal of unconnected regions to enhance accuracy and robustness. Our results demonstrate a substantial improvement, with a 38% increase in the Dice similarity coefficient for the left adrenal gland and an 11% increase for the right adrenal gland on the AMOS dataset, achieved by the InceptionV3 model. Additionally, the pipeline significantly reduces false positives, underscoring its potential for clinical applications and its superiority over existing methods. These advancements make our approach a crucial contribution to the field of medical image segmentation.

Spatial–Temporal Information Fusion for Thyroid Nodule Segmentation in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI: A Novel Approach
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
Han B., Yang Q., Tao X., Wu M., Yang L., Deng W., Cui W., Luo D., Wan Q., Liu Z., Zhang N.

Top-100
Citing journals
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
|
|
Annals of Coloproctology
166 citations, 3.54%
|
|
Colorectal Disease
120 citations, 2.56%
|
|
Cancers
120 citations, 2.56%
|
|
International Journal of Colorectal Disease
118 citations, 2.52%
|
|
Cureus
105 citations, 2.24%
|
|
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
86 citations, 1.84%
|
|
Techniques in Coloproctology
81 citations, 1.73%
|
|
Diseases of the Colon and Rectum
77 citations, 1.64%
|
|
Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon
72 citations, 1.54%
|
|
Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
67 citations, 1.43%
|
|
Frontiers in Oncology
56 citations, 1.2%
|
|
ANZ Journal of Surgery
56 citations, 1.2%
|
|
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
53 citations, 1.13%
|
|
Medicine (United States)
53 citations, 1.13%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
52 citations, 1.11%
|
|
Scientific Reports
49 citations, 1.05%
|
|
World Journal of Gastroenterology
47 citations, 1%
|
|
Frontiers in Surgery
39 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Asian Journal of Surgery
36 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
35 citations, 0.75%
|
|
European Journal of Surgical Oncology
32 citations, 0.68%
|
|
International Journal of Surgery
31 citations, 0.66%
|
|
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
30 citations, 0.64%
|
|
Annals of Surgical Oncology
29 citations, 0.62%
|
|
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
29 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Medicina
26 citations, 0.56%
|
|
World Journal of Clinical Cases
25 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery
25 citations, 0.53%
|
|
BMC Gastroenterology
24 citations, 0.51%
|
|
BMC Cancer
24 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Journal of Coloproctology
24 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
24 citations, 0.51%
|
|
World Journal of Surgery
23 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A
23 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Annals of Medicine and Surgery
23 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Updates in Surgery
23 citations, 0.49%
|
|
BMC Surgery
22 citations, 0.47%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
22 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Indian Journal of Surgery
22 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Koloproktologia
22 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Coloproctology
20 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Asian journal of endoscopic surgery
20 citations, 0.43%
|
|
PLoS ONE
20 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
19 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Journal of Surgical Oncology
19 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer
19 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Journal of the Korean Medical Association
18 citations, 0.38%
|
|
The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi
18 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
18 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Clinical Colorectal Cancer
17 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Heliyon
17 citations, 0.36%
|
|
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
16 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Surgery Today
16 citations, 0.34%
|
|
American Journal of Surgery
16 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Cirugia Espanola
15 citations, 0.32%
|
|
BMJ Case Reports
15 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Cancer Medicine
15 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Abdominal Radiology
14 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Surgery (US)
14 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Robotic Surgery
14 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques
14 citations, 0.3%
|
|
American Surgeon
14 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Surgical Case Reports
14 citations, 0.3%
|
|
World Journal of Men?s Health
13 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Chirurg
13 citations, 0.28%
|
|
British Journal of Surgery
13 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Oncology Letters
13 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Oncotarget
12 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Geriatric Oncology
12 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Cancer Management and Research
12 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of visceral surgery
12 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi
12 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery = Khirurgiya. Zurnal im. N.I. Pirogova
11 citations, 0.23%
|
|
BMJ Open
11 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology
11 citations, 0.23%
|
|
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
11 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Life
11 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery
11 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Surgical Oncology
10 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery
10 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Diagnostics
10 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Surgical Innovation
10 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Biomedicines
10 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Annals of Surgery
10 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Cirugía Española (English Edition)
10 citations, 0.21%
|
|
European Journal of Oncology Nursing
9 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Reactions Weekly
9 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale
9 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
8 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Digestive and Liver Disease
8 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Nutrients
8 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Current Problems in Surgery
8 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
8 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Surgical Research
8 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology
8 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Annals of Translational Medicine
8 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Surgical Case Reports
8 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Digestive Surgery
7 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
7 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Surgical Infections
7 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
|
Citing publishers
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
|
Springer Nature
1120 citations, 23.91%
|
|
Elsevier
670 citations, 14.3%
|
|
Wiley
423 citations, 9.03%
|
|
MDPI
328 citations, 7%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
256 citations, 5.47%
|
|
Korean Society of Coloproctology
167 citations, 3.57%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
137 citations, 2.92%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
127 citations, 2.71%
|
|
The Japan Society of Coloproctology
86 citations, 1.84%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
78 citations, 1.67%
|
|
SAGE
68 citations, 1.45%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
64 citations, 1.37%
|
|
Oxford University Press
51 citations, 1.09%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
49 citations, 1.05%
|
|
XMLink
46 citations, 0.98%
|
|
The Korean Surgical Society
45 citations, 0.96%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
38 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
37 citations, 0.79%
|
|
BMJ
37 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
33 citations, 0.7%
|
|
The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery
24 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Medknow
23 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
22 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia
22 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Russian Association of Coloproctology
22 citations, 0.47%
|
|
S. Karger AG
21 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
20 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Korean Society of Gastroenterology
18 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Korean Medical Association (KAMJE)
17 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Media Sphere Publishing House
14 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Impact Journals
13 citations, 0.28%
|
|
13 citations, 0.28%
|
|
12 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
12 citations, 0.26%
|
|
IntechOpen
12 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Publishing House ABV Press
10 citations, 0.21%
|
|
IOS Press
9 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
9 citations, 0.19%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
9 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes
7 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
7 citations, 0.15%
|
|
JMIR Publications
7 citations, 0.15%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
6 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Asian Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention
6 citations, 0.13%
|
|
American College of Gastroenterology
6 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
6 citations, 0.13%
|
|
PeerJ
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Eco-Vector LLC
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
F1000 Research
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Hans Publishers
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
5 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Remedium, Ltd.
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
The Korean Society of Radiology
4 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Korean Cancer Association
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Obsidiana Editores
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Fundacja Polski Przeglad Chirurgiczny
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
SciELO
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
OAE Publishing Inc.
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Japan Surgical Association
3 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Scientific Publishers
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Portland Press
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Edizioni Minerva Medica
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Korean Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Editorial Office of Gut and Liver
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American College of Physicians
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Society for Translational Oncology
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Aran Ediciones SA
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Roentgen Ray Society
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Siberian State Medical University
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Brazilian Society of Urology
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
British Institute of Radiology
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Instituto Brasileiro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Gastroenterologia/Brazilian Institute for Studies and Research in Gastroenterology
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Moffitt Cancer Center
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Royal College of Surgeons of England
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine Press
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
RCNi
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Korean Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition/The Korean Society of Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer Research
2 citations, 0.04%
|
|
World Scientific
1 citation, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
Publishing organizations
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
|
|
Yonsei University
18 publications, 3.57%
|
|
Seoul National University
9 publications, 1.79%
|
|
University of Ulsan
9 publications, 1.79%
|
|
Sungkyunkwan University
8 publications, 1.59%
|
|
Asan Medical Center
7 publications, 1.39%
|
|
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
7 publications, 1.39%
|
|
Samsung Medical Center
6 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Catholic University of Korea
6 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Eulji University
6 publications, 1.19%
|
|
Severance Hospital
5 publications, 0.99%
|
|
National Cancer Center
5 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Samsung
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Seoul National University Hospital
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Konkuk University Medical Center
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Ewha Womans University
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Wonkwang University
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Inje University Busan Paik Hospital
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital
4 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Chonnam National University
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Chungnam National University
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Chungnam National University Hospital
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Chonbuk National University
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Yeungnam University
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Cha University
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Dankook University
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Keimyung University
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Chosun University
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Kosin University
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
St. Antonius Hospital
3 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Marmara University
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Kyung Hee University Medical Center
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Ajou University
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Chungbuk National University
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
CHA Bundang Medical Center
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Gyeongsang National University
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Gyeongsang National University Hospital
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
St. Vincent's Hospital
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Eulji University Hospital
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Hallym University
2 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Akdeniz University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Istanbul University Cerrahpasa
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
King George's Medical University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Iran University of Medical Sciences
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Maltepe University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Lausanne University Hospital
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Geneva University Hospitals
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
National University of Singapore
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Hospital Tor Vergata
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Korea University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Kyung Hee University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Yonsei University Health System
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Kyungpook National University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Chung-Ang University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Pusan National University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Dongguk University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Kyungpook National University Medical Center
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Inje University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Daegu Catholic University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Daegu Catholic University Medical Center
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Gachon University Gil Medical Center
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Kosin University Gospel Hospital
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Jichi Medical University
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Federal University of Goiás
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Isala hospital
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Doctor Peset University Hospital
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
National Cancer Institute (Lithuania)
1 publication, 0.2%
|
|
Show all (52 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
|
Publishing countries
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 153, 30.36%
Republic of Korea
153 publications, 30.36%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 7, 1.39%
United Kingdom
7 publications, 1.39%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 6, 1.19%
Iran
6 publications, 1.19%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 5, 0.99%
Turkey
5 publications, 0.99%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 4, 0.79%
Singapore
4 publications, 0.79%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 3, 0.6%
Lithuania
3 publications, 0.6%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 3, 0.6%
Netherlands
3 publications, 0.6%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 2, 0.4%
Australia
2 publications, 0.4%
|
India
|
India, 2, 0.4%
India
2 publications, 0.4%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 2, 0.4%
Spain
2 publications, 0.4%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 2, 0.4%
Switzerland
2 publications, 0.4%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 2, 0.4%
Japan
2 publications, 0.4%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 0.2%
Brazil
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 1, 0.2%
Italy
1 publication, 0.2%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 1, 0.2%
Nepal
1 publication, 0.2%
|
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
1 profile journal article
Jungnam Kwon
15 publications,
36 citations
h-index: 3