International Studies Review
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
3.1
SJR
1.241
CiteScore
6.7
Categories
Geography, Planning and Development
Political Science and International Relations
Areas
Social Sciences
Years of issue
1999-2025
journal names
International Studies Review
INT STUD REV
Top-3 citing journals

International Studies Review
(862 citations)

SSRN Electronic Journal
(474 citations)

International Studies Quarterly
(401 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Syracuse University
(46 publications)

American University
(28 publications)

University of Oxford
(27 publications)

University of Oxford
(12 publications)

Uppsala University
(10 publications)

Australian National University
(8 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 724
Q3

The spatial dimension of the Olympics: the case of the Winter Games
della Sala V.
The editions of the Olympic Games have created a major urban transformation, allowing for a new critical perspective on the latest urban dimension of the Games; in particular, the winter edition underwent profound transformations in spatial patterns. The study analyses the different spatial models of the Winter Olympic Games that have developed up to the present day. Focusing on the relationship between the Olympic Village and the urban fabric will provide valuable tools for evaluating the Olympic event on the subject territory. These spatial models show the importance of the spatial impact of the Olympic Village on the city, allowing us to consider Olympic urbanism as an asset that cannot be destroyed in the post-Olympic phase. Since the first Winter Olympic Games in Chamonix in 1924, the event has been organised in mountain resorts with ski resorts, sports halls and accommodation facilities. We will observe how the winter edition since Oslo 1952 has complexified into a broader spatial model. Therefore, we will analyse how creating new structures will always entail territorial changes and new impacts on the internal connections of the city and the territory. The research proposes an innovative analysis of Olympic urbanism in general and of Olympic villages in particular, which consolidates the field of study that Olympic urbanism represents and offers a valuable document for the future construction of new Olympic villages in the coming decades. In addition, the study aims to reflect on the specific case of Turin in 2006 to observe how the regional model has become the model favoured by future candidate cities. Through the analysis, we will observe how the winter edition has become a model permanently embedded in the regional strategies of host cities. We will see how the Olympic event can be crucial for planning regional infrastructure, transport systems, services and housing in regional areas.
Q3

L’ère des STAPS : les qualités de la formation des enseignants d’EPS en France (1975-2023)
Renaud J.
Des IUFM aux INSPE, les tribulations dernières des institutions de formation des enseignants ont forcément généré des effets à l’échelle de l’EPS et de la construction de sa corporation. Par une histoire du temps présent, nous allons ouvrir plusieurs pistes pour analyser les forces qui participent à la trajectoire actuelle de la discipline. Si la diversification des mentions de Licence et de Master affecte le système en amont, les évolutions sociales et les politiques éducatives transforment le métier en aval de la construction de l’enseignant. De la lente émergence des STAPS à l’instauration de la compétence comme mètre-étalon du futur professionnel, le déplacement des facteurs de la « qualité », amène à identifier les enjeux qui saisissent les professeurs d’EPS tout au long de leur carrière, de leurs balbutiements à leur incontournable aggiornamento personnel pendant le métier. Pour autant, à travers quelques exemples, nous verrons, derrière un panorama déjà complexe, comment certains héritages scientifiques s’inscrivent sur un temps long qui dépassent l’influence hic et nunc de personnages locaux (Fuchs & Renaud, 2020).
Q3

Mesurer l’autorégulation émotionnelle d’élèves d’école primaire dans le cadre d’un programme de pauses actives : une étude mixte associée à une triangulation des données
Chesnais N., Cabagno G., Verret C.
Cet article s’appuie sur un devis mixte convergent associé à une triangulation des données pour mesurer les effets d’un programme de pauses actives sur l’autorégulation émotionnelle des élèves à l’école primaire, en particulier chez des élèves présentant des difficultés comportementales et émotionnelles (DCE). Ainsi, 156 élèves âgés de six à dix ans et leurs sept enseignants ont participé à cette étude. Des questionnaires ont été remplis par les élèves et les enseignants, des observations sur les élèves et des entretiens avec les enseignants ont été réalisés. L’intégration des résultats obtenus révèle les effets favorables d’un programme de pauses actives sur l’autorégulation émotionnelle des élèves, notamment chez les élèves DCE et met en évidence une pluralité de processus d’autorégulation émotionnelle mobilisés par les élèves lors de l’utilisation des pauses actives. Cette étude souligne également l’intérêt et la pertinence de l’utilisation d’une méthodologie mixte associée à une triangulation des données pour analyser les émotions des élèves dans leur contexte, à l’école primaire.
Q3

Physiological responses to low-intensity stationary cycling with intermittent positive and negative pressure an exploratory study
Del Vecchio L., Climstein M., Beavers R.
Background: This study evaluated the physiological responses to intermittent positive and negative pressure (IPNP) in 17 healthy, recreationally active individuals (10 males, average age 33.1 years, mean BMI 26.1 kg/m²) during stationary, upright cycling.
Methods: We assessed acute IPNP effects on heart rate variability (HRV), blood pressure, and cardiovascular responses during moderate-intensity exercise. Participants engaged in two exercise modalities: Monark cycle ergometry (Mc) and cycling with IPNP, ranging from ±15 to ±25 Mbar.
Results: Results indicated normal physiological responses in heart rate and systolic blood pressure (SBP) from rest to peak exercise in both modalities. A non-significant difference in SBP was observed during Mc compared to IPNP. Significant differences in mean arterial pressure were noted during recovery from IPNP cycling, highlighting a distinct cardiovascular response. HR increased in both conditions during exercise, with a more pronounced increase during Mc. Comfort and perceived exertion revealed no significant differences between the two modalities, indicating the potential acceptability of IPNP therapies.
Conclusion: The study provides valuable insights into cardiovascular dynamics during stationary cycling with intermittent positive and negative pressure and highlights key physiological responses that warrant further investigation.
Q3

La dynamique émotionnelle d’un entraîneur lors d’une saison à l’étranger : une analyse de son cours de vie en handball de haut niveau
Visioli J., Petiot O., Guérin J.
Les dimensions émotionnelles de l’activité des entraîneurs de très haut niveau restent peu investiguées, en particulier sur une temporalité longue. L’objectif de cette recherche était d’analyser le cours de vie d’un entraîneur de handball français au plus haut niveau, en focalisant notamment sur la dynamique de ses émotions lors d’une saison. En nous basant sur le programme de recherche du « cours d’action » (Theureau, 2015), nous avons adopté l’approche de Hauw et Lemeur (2013) pour analyser le « cours de vie relatif à une pratique » en contexte sportif. Des entretiens consistant à confronter l’entraîneur à une frise représentant les deux périodes de sa saison ont été conduits, puis analysés de manière à reconstruire sa dynamique émotionnelle. Huit périodes ont ainsi été identifiées. Lors de la première partie de saison, la dynamique émotionnelle évolue des émotions négatives à des émotions positives, et se situe globalement dans les valeurs positives. Lors de la deuxième partie de saison, les émotions se situent prioritairement dans des valeurs négatives. Cette dynamique émotionnelle prend sens dans la mise en relation avec l’expérience de l’entraîneur tout au long de la saison. Les résultats sont discutés au regard de quatre apports majeurs : (1) Une dynamique émotionnelle en « dent de scie » à l’échelle de la saison ; (2) Une dynamique émotionnelle qui se comprend en accédant à l’expérience ; (3) Une dynamique émotionnelle qui infléchit les actions de l’entraîneur ; (4) Une dynamique émotionnelle qui participe de la transformation des connaissances.
Q3

Specific impact of a COVID-19 infection on training modalities of endurance sportsmen: an observational approach
Durand F., Boudry F., Yonnet A., Meric H.
Endurance exercise places demand on the respiratory system. A COVID-19 infection, which affects the respiratory system, could potentially increase this strain, possibly resulting in decreased endurance capacity. This research sought to examine how a COVID-19 infection influenced training modalities for endurance sportsmen compared to those not trained in endurance sports. A total of 468 sportsmen completed an online self-report questionnaire. The participants were categorized into endurance sportsmen (END, n = 246) and non-endurance sportsmen (NEND, n = 222). The study analyzed demographic information, sports profiles, COVID-19 infection characteristics, and the infection’s impact on training regimens. No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding infection symptoms, symptom duration, lingering symptoms, or challenges when resuming training. However, 74.4% of END sportsmen reduced their training volume, compared to 25.6% of NEND sportsmen (p < 0.001). Significant between-group differences were noted for initial training durations of 2–5, 5–8, and 8–12 hours per week. A significantly larger proportion of END sportsmen required extended recovery time compared to NEND sportsmen (61.7% vs 38.3%, p < 0.05). The study concluded that COVID-19 infection leads to specific alterations in the training patterns of endurance trained sportsmen, resulting in decreased training volume and increased recovery time when compared to non-endurance sportsmen.
Q3

Emotions during elite sport competitions: a descriptive study of the nature, frequency and duration of emotions, and their effects on performance
Macquet A., Loup A.
This study presents a descriptive analysis of the emotions experienced by elite fencers during World Cup competitions. It hypothesised that: (a) elite athletes (EAs) would experience a wide panel of emotions corresponding to the valences (positive, negative and surprise), and that these would differ by gender; (b) the duration of emotions would vary; (c) EAs would experience several emotions simultaneously; and (d) experiencing emotions would impact performance. Twelve self-confrontation interviews were conducted with EAs, who were asked to describe their emotions in relation to events observed on a video. Qualitative analysis of interview data explored the nature of the emotions experienced during matches. Quantitative analysis provided results about the frequency of emotions, their duration, co-occurrence, and relationships with performance. Results demonstrated that: (a) there is a large panel of emotions in elite sports, and that gender did not affect emotional valence, (b) the duration of emotions experienced varied, (c) EAs experienced several basis emotions during hit-building sequences, (d) emotions did not appear to influence performance in elite fencing. This research offers preliminary insights into how EAs experienced emotions, and associates this with performance in competitions. It could enrich the emotional approach of coaches and psychologists.
Q3

La réforme de la formation initiale des enseignants d’éducation physique et à la santé en Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles : Le cas de la Haute École Léonard de Vinci
Dupont J.
À l’instar d’autres nations et régions à travers le monde, la Belgique francophone a entrepris une vaste réforme de son système éducatif, connue sous le nom de Pacte pour un Enseignement d’Excellence (PEE) (Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles, 2017). Cette réforme inclut un ensemble de mesures structurelles spécifiques, telles que l’extension du tronc commun de 3 à 15 ans et la révision approfondie de la Formation Initiale des Enseignants (FIE) (Dachet & Bayet, 2021). En lien avec la thématique de ce numéro spécial, cette contribution adopte une approche descriptive visant à exposer les défis que le PEE implique pour l’enseignement de l’éducation physique, de 3 à 15 ans, en Belgique francophone. En outre, elle se fixe pour objectif de détailler et d’analyser la mise en pratique du nouveau curriculum de la FIE en éducation physique et à la santé. Après une vue d’ensemble, une analyse de cas spécifique, portant sur la Haute École Léonard de Vinci à Bruxelles, sera menée pour mettre en lumière les stratégies et les contenus développés au sein de cette institution d’enseignement supérieur.
Q3

Temporal optimization of movement regulations in ball sports experts revealed by a visuo-manual pursuit task
Mallek M., Thouvarecq R., Habacha H., Benguigui N.
The present work focuses on the effect of expertise in ball sports on the perceptual-motor processes. Non-Experts, Experts and Super-Experts were evaluated through a visuo-manual tracking task in a 2D environment, with more or less predictable trajectories (predictable bounces and unpredictable deviations). The results showed that this task, as schematic as it may be, allows the discrimination of expertise in ball sports. Moreover, the multiple regression analysis revealed that the performance could be explained by the frequency of the regulations and the temporal delays to perform them. Our results highlight the optimized perception-action coupling of experts.
Q3

Validation de la version francophone de l’Échelle d’Effort Physique
St-Denis B., Beaudry S., Boisgontier M.P., Cheval B., Maltagliati S.
Objectif : Pour mieux expliquer l’engagement dans l’activité physique, la Physical Effort Scale (PES) a récemment été développée. L’objectif de la présente étude était de valider la version francophone de cette échelle (PES-FR). Méthodologie : Après traduction de l’échelle originale, la validité structurelle et de construit de la PES-FR a été examinée dans un échantillon de 362 étudiants canadiens francophones (62 % de femmes, Mâge = 20 ans). La stabilité temporelle de l’échelle a été testée dans un second échantillon (n = 101, 79 % de femmes, Mâge = 21 ans) ayant complété deux fois le questionnaire avec sept jours d’écart. Résultats : La structure en deux facteurs de la PES-FR a été soutenue, avec une dimension d’approche et une dimension d’évitement. Les deux sous-échelles présentent une cohérence interne élevée (α = 0,86 pour l’approche et α = 0,89 pour l’évitement). La validité convergente et la validité discriminante ont été confirmées par des corrélations entre l’approche et l’évitement avec plusieurs variables motivationnelles. La validité concurrente de l’échelle a été soutenue par des associations entre le niveau habituel d’activité physique et les tendances d’approche (r = 0,35) et d’évitement (r = −0,21). La stabilité temporelle a aussi été confirmée dans le second échantillon. Conclusions : La PES-FR est un outil fiable et valide pour mesurer les différences individuelles dans l’évaluation de l’effort physique. Les implications pratiques sont discutées au regard des enjeux de promotion de l’activité physique.
Q3

Les modèles socio-économiques des associations : le cas des associations sportives des hauts de France
Carin Y., Hamonier J., Sallé L.
Les études menées sur les associations sportives se concentrent exclusivement sur leur modèle économique sans appréhender le projet associatif, les ressources humaines et les alliances avec leur écosystème. La littérature actuelle invite à dépasser la notion de modèle économique pour celle de modèle socio-économique. La recherche participative menée avec les acteurs du mouvement sportif des Hauts de France a permis de collecter les données auprès d’un échantillon de 1046 associations sportives. Les statistiques descriptives et les différents tests statistiques mettent en évidence des liens entre différentes variables et le budget de l’association sportive. Les principaux résultats montrent en quoi les ressources humaines, le profil du Président, les alliances avec l’écosystème sont essentielles pour assurer un niveau de ressources financières nécessaires au développement du projet associatif et à la pérennité de l’association. L’étude permet une meilleure connaissance des modèles socio-économiques des associations d’un secteur peu investigué, celui du sport. D’un point de vue managérial, cette recherche doit aider les associations à mieux répondre aux challenges et aux crises auxquels elles sont confrontées. Les acteurs impliqués peuvent y trouver les moyens de définir des politiques de soutien et d’accompagnement adaptées à chaque modèle.
Q3

Prospective, in-activity and retrospective emotions in physical education: development and validation of three state achievement emotions questionnaires
Rebouillat A., Pasco D., Roure C.
According to Pekrun et al. (2023), the construct of achievement emotions has been operationalized through three dimensions: (1) valence (i.e., pleasant/unpleasant emotions), (2) arousal (i.e., activating/deactivating emotions), and (3) temporal relation (i.e., prospective, in-activity and retrospective emotions). Based on these three dimensions, Pekrun et al. (2023) has proposed the taxonomy of achievement emotions as a 2 × 2 × 3 dimensional structure. To date, a robust questionnaire is still lacking to measure state achievement emotions in reference to the 2 × 2 × 3 Pekrun’s et al. (2023) model. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop three valid and reliable questionnaires measuring students’ prospective, in-activity and retrospective state achievement emotions in physical education. Four stages were followed: (1) based on a literature review on achievement emotions and a committee process validation, preliminary versions of the three questionnaires were built; (2) the factor structures and internal reliabilities were established in a first study with 1159 secondary school students; (3) the factor structures were confirmed by comparing confirmatory factor analyses and exploratory structural equation modeling in a second study with 1019 secondary school students; (4) internal and concurrent validities were assessed with 656 students. The stages followed for the development of the three questionnaires demonstrated strong support for their psychometric properties and factor structures.
Q3

Les inducteurs émotionnels perçus par des lycéens en EPS : quel impact de cinq formats de jeu en badminton ?
Visioli J., Level J., Dieu O.
L’objectif de cet article est d’identifier et de comparer les inducteurs des émotions positives et négatives ressenties par des élèves du secondaire en EPS dans le cadre de cinq formats de jeu en badminton. Les perceptions de 58 lycéens (24 filles et 34 garçons – Mâge = 15,01, Ec = 0,25) ont été recueillies à l’aide d’un questionnaire basé sur la méthode des incidents critiques (Flanagan, 1954). Les élèves devaient raconter le moment le plus marquant vécu au sein de chaque format, juste après l’avoir pratiqué. L’analyse inductive des incidents critiques recueillis a permis de rendre compte et de comparer l’impact des dispositifs proposés par l’enseignant sur les émotions positives et négatives des élèves. La discussion invite notamment à porter une attention particulière aux émotions des filles et à la sensibilité à l’espace de jeu, mais également à relativiser l’impact du seul format de jeu sur les émotions des élèves. Plus globalement, c’est l’impact émotionnel des formats de jeu en badminton qui est interrogé dans l’optique de la formation des enseignants d’EPS, en lien avec le projet de conception et d’exploitation d’« affective learning design ».
Q3

Classifying, downgrading, reclassifying. The French “women’s” tennis ranking categories facing the test of change?
Fontaine M., Hidri Neys O.
In the vein of work carried out in the sociology of sport over the last thirty years or so on high-level sport, this article focuses on women’s tennis. Based on a quantitative survey of 5293 French female competitive players, this article invites us to distance ourselves from the the French Tennis Federation (FFT) classification categories as potential categories for sociological analysis. Our results show the limits of taking institutional rankings into account in order to understand the conditions of existence, practice and performance of female tennis players. Based on a multiple correspondence analysis followed by a hierarchical ascending classification, three typical profiles were identified: the ‘Sunday’ players practising in the ‘leisure-pleasure’ mode, the ‘eclectic’ players, with heterogeneous socio-demographic characteristics, sharing the common point of moving towards a ‘serious leisure activity’, and finally the ‘vulnerable’ players devoting themselves exclusively to their ‘profession’ even though they continue not to be recognised as workers in their own right.
Q3

How do emotional tones, involvement in the situation, perception and technical adaptations interplay in elite athletes’ performance optimization? A case study in Formula Kite
Terrien E., Genevey M., Kermarrec G., Saury J.
It is widely accepted in sports psychology that emotions and performance are interrelated. However, the interplay between athletes’ emotions and the associated involvements in the situation, perceptions and technical adaptations has remained largely unexplored in ecological sport settings. Therefore, the purpose of the present study is to use an activity-centered approach to apprehend these links in an ecological setting. We used the theoretical and methodological framework of the course of experience to analyze the activity of two elite Formula Kite riders during speed tests. Our results highlight that during the speed tests, the riders’ pleasant emotional tones were associated with technical adaptations mostly related to global involvements in the situation and global sources of perturbation, while unpleasant emotional tones were associated with more specific involvements in the situation and local sources of perturbation. Furthermore, pleasant and unpleasant emotional tones were associated with different technical adaptations. Altogether, the results of the study emphasize the interest of apprehending the athlete’s performance optimization through a holistic viewpoint taking into consideration both the athletes’ emotions and their modes of technical adaptation to dynamic sport situations “in the doing”.
Top-100
Citing journals
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
|
International Studies Review
862 citations, 4.49%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
474 citations, 2.47%
|
|
International Studies Quarterly
401 citations, 2.09%
|
|
European Journal of International Relations
361 citations, 1.88%
|
|
International Studies Perspectives
223 citations, 1.16%
|
|
International Politics
206 citations, 1.07%
|
|
Foreign Policy Analysis
198 citations, 1.03%
|
|
Review of International Studies
195 citations, 1.02%
|
|
Journal of Peace Research
182 citations, 0.95%
|
|
Journal of Conflict Resolution
159 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Journal of International Relations and Development
155 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Cambridge Review of International Affairs
151 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Cooperation and Conflict
149 citations, 0.78%
|
|
International Theory
131 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Third World Quarterly
116 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Conflict Management and Peace Science
115 citations, 0.6%
|
|
International Interactions
114 citations, 0.59%
|
|
International Organization
108 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Review of International Political Economy
106 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Journal of Global Security Studies
105 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding
93 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Global Studies Quarterly
85 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Security Dialogue
82 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Pacific Review
80 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Political Geography
80 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Globalizations
75 citations, 0.39%
|
|
British Journal of Politics and International Relations
69 citations, 0.36%
|
|
International Political Sociology
68 citations, 0.35%
|
|
International Peacekeeping
66 citations, 0.34%
|
|
World Development
60 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Global Policy
59 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Sustainability
57 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of International Political Theory
56 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of European Public Policy
55 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Review of International Organizations
55 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Contemporary Security Policy
53 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of Common Market Studies
52 citations, 0.27%
|
|
International Security
51 citations, 0.27%
|
|
International Feminist Journal of Politics
48 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Politics
47 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Perspectives on Politics
47 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Alternatives
47 citations, 0.24%
|
|
European Security
47 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Australian Journal of International Affairs
43 citations, 0.22%
|
|
International Political Science Review
42 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Civil Wars
41 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Annual Review of Political Science
41 citations, 0.21%
|
|
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
41 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Global Environmental Politics
40 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Geopolitics
40 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Contemporary Politics
37 citations, 0.19%
|
|
All Azimuth
37 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Conflict, Security and Development
37 citations, 0.19%
|
|
International Relations of the Asia-Pacific
37 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Global Society
37 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Critical Studies on Security
34 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Politics
33 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Place Branding and Public Diplomacy
33 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management
32 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Global Affairs
31 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Ethnopolitics
30 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Human Rights
29 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Revista Brasileira de Politica Internacional
29 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Europe-Asia Studies
29 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Global Environmental Change
28 citations, 0.15%
|
|
European Journal of International Security
28 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Democratization
28 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Spectator
28 citations, 0.15%
|
|
PLoS ONE
28 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Contexto Internacional
28 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Territory, Politics, Governance
27 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Small Wars and Insurgencies
27 citations, 0.14%
|
|
American Journal of Political Science
26 citations, 0.14%
|
|
PS - Political Science and Politics
26 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Social Sciences
26 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Canadian Foreign Policy Journal
26 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Shocks and Political Change
26 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Critical Studies on Terrorism
25 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Asian Politics and Policy
25 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Pacific Focus
25 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Comparative Political Studies
24 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Chinese Political Science
24 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
24 citations, 0.12%
|
|
International Studies
24 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Political Science Review
23 citations, 0.12%
|
|
New Political Economy
23 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Politics and Policy
23 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea
23 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica
23 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Political Studies Review
22 citations, 0.11%
|
|
New Perspectives
22 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Human Rights Review
22 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of European Integration
22 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Études internationales
22 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Religions
21 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Meditteranean Politics
21 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Governance
21 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Handbuch Internationale Beziehungen
21 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Strategic Studies
20 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Geoforum
20 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
|
|
Taylor & Francis
3100 citations, 16.14%
|
|
Oxford University Press
2561 citations, 13.34%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
2246 citations, 11.7%
|
|
SAGE
2128 citations, 11.08%
|
|
Springer Nature
1946 citations, 10.13%
|
|
Wiley
955 citations, 4.97%
|
|
Elsevier
786 citations, 4.09%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
458 citations, 2.38%
|
|
MDPI
180 citations, 0.94%
|
|
Emerald
175 citations, 0.91%
|
|
MIT Press
103 citations, 0.54%
|
|
IGI Global
96 citations, 0.5%
|
|
SciELO
81 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
73 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Brill
73 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Annual Reviews
71 citations, 0.37%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
70 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
65 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
56 citations, 0.29%
|
|
CAIRN
56 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Center for Foreign Policy and Peace Research, Ihsan Dogramaci Peace Foundation
41 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
38 citations, 0.2%
|
|
OpenEdition
36 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
36 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Instituto Brasileiro de Relacoes Internacionais
30 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego
24 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
23 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Bristol University Press
23 citations, 0.12%
|
|
IOP Publishing
20 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IntechOpen
20 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Moscow State Institute of International Relations
20 citations, 0.1%
|
|
University of California Press
19 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Duke University Press
17 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Institute of International Relations, Prague
17 citations, 0.09%
|
|
MGIMO University
17 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
16 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Ubiquity Press
16 citations, 0.08%
|
|
World Scientific
14 citations, 0.07%
|
|
The Royal Society
13 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
13 citations, 0.07%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
12 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
12 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Noncommercial Partnership Editorial Board Polis
11 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Institut fur Afrika-Kunde
10 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Institut fur Asienkunde
10 citations, 0.05%
|
|
F1000 Research
10 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Berghahn Books
10 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University, School of World Politics
10 citations, 0.05%
|
|
International Relations Council of Turkey
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Institute of Asian Studies at the GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Intellect
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Edinburgh University Press
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Economic Association
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Copernicus
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Hanyang University
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Liverpool University Press
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Academy of Management
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Center for the Study of the Presidency
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Unisa Press
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
BMJ
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Pennsylvania State University Press
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
EDP Sciences
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Polibijaus Fondas
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
IOS Press
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
AIP Publishing
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Index Copernicus
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Belgrade Centre for Security Policy
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Centro de Estudos de Opiniao Publica, Universidade Estadual de Campinas
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Center for Crisis Society Studies
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Associazone culturale Pragma
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Escola Brasileira de Administracao Publica da Fundacao Getulio Vargas
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
University of Calgary Press
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institut fur Iberoamerika-Kunde
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
NP Voprosy Ekonomiki
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Infra-M Academic Publishing House
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Project MUSE
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Cognizant, LLC
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
|
|
Syracuse University
46 publications, 2.28%
|
|
American University
28 publications, 1.39%
|
|
University of Oxford
27 publications, 1.34%
|
|
University of Southern California
20 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Uppsala University
18 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Georgetown University
18 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Arizona State University
17 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
16 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
15 publications, 0.74%
|
|
National University of Singapore
15 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Cornell University
15 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Australian National University
14 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of St Andrews
14 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
13 publications, 0.65%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
13 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Florida
13 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Bilkent University
12 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Cambridge
12 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
12 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Glasgow
12 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Columbia University
12 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
12 publications, 0.6%
|
|
George Mason University
12 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
12 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
12 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Exeter
12 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Denver
12 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
11 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Harvard University
11 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
11 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Goethe University Frankfurt
11 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Stockholm University
10 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Stanford University
10 publications, 0.5%
|
|
George Washington University
10 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Duke University
10 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Washington
10 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Brown University
10 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Florida International University
10 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Kentucky
10 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Miami University
10 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Texas A&M University
10 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
9 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University College London
9 publications, 0.45%
|
|
King's College London
9 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Manchester
9 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Sydney
9 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Arizona
9 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Michigan
9 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Leiden University
9 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of North Texas
9 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Oslo
8 publications, 0.4%
|
|
New York University
8 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
8 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
8 publications, 0.4%
|
|
York University
8 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Carleton University
8 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Sussex
8 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Delaware
8 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
8 publications, 0.4%
|
|
ETH Zurich
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Aarhus University
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Birmingham
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Virginia Tech
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
San Francisco State University
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Ottawa
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Utah
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
William & Mary
7 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Haifa
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Yale University
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Queensland
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Griffith University
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Princeton University
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Tufts University
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Aberystwyth University
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Peace Research Institute Frankfurt (Leibniz-Institut für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung)
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
German Institute for Global and Area Studies (Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien)
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Groningen
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Sheffield
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Toronto
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Brigham Young University
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Connecticut
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Bath
6 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Koc University
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Iowa State University
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Monash University
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Central European University
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Bristol
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Queen's University at Kingston
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Waterloo
5 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
|
University of Oxford
12 publications, 3.31%
|
|
Uppsala University
10 publications, 2.75%
|
|
Australian National University
8 publications, 2.2%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
7 publications, 1.93%
|
|
Stockholm University
7 publications, 1.93%
|
|
University College London
6 publications, 1.65%
|
|
University of Exeter
6 publications, 1.65%
|
|
Bilkent University
5 publications, 1.38%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
5 publications, 1.38%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
5 publications, 1.38%
|
|
University of Cambridge
5 publications, 1.38%
|
|
King's College London
5 publications, 1.38%
|
|
University of Birmingham
5 publications, 1.38%
|
|
American University
5 publications, 1.38%
|
|
Peace Research Institute Frankfurt (Leibniz-Institut für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung)
5 publications, 1.38%
|
|
Technical University of Darmstadt
5 publications, 1.38%
|
|
Leiden University
5 publications, 1.38%
|
|
University of Denver
5 publications, 1.38%
|
|
ETH Zurich
4 publications, 1.1%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
4 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Southern California
4 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Yale University
4 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Sydney
4 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of St Andrews
4 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Tel Aviv University
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Lund University
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Technische Universität Dresden
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Aarhus University
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Oslo
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong–Liverpool University
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
National University of Singapore
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Glasgow
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Georgetown University
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
George Washington University
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Princeton University
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Arizona State University
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Duke University
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Hamburg University
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Duisburg-Essen
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Goethe University Frankfurt
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Bielefeld University
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Texas A&M University
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Connecticut
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Bath
3 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Tsinghua University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Genoa
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Umeå University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Basel
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Université Catholique de Louvain
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
City, University of London
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Royal Holloway University of London
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Charles University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Monash University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Deakin University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Columbia University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Syracuse University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Central Florida
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Ohio University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Central European University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Keele University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Simon Fraser University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Groningen
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Bamberg
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Cardiff University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Toronto Metropolitan University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Carleton University
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Ottawa
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Reading
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Sussex
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of North Texas
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Utah
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Tennessee
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of York
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University College Dublin
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
University of Essex
2 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
1 publication, 0.28%
|
|
Nazarbayev University
1 publication, 0.28%
|
|
Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.28%
|
|
Hacettepe University
1 publication, 0.28%
|
|
Koc University
1 publication, 0.28%
|
|
Middle East Technical University
1 publication, 0.28%
|
|
Ozyegin University
1 publication, 0.28%
|
|
Jawaharlal Nehru University
1 publication, 0.28%
|
|
Sakarya University
1 publication, 0.28%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
|
USA
|
USA, 892, 44.29%
USA
892 publications, 44.29%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 226, 11.22%
United Kingdom
226 publications, 11.22%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 191, 9.48%
Italy
191 publications, 9.48%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 97, 4.82%
Canada
97 publications, 4.82%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 84, 4.17%
Germany
84 publications, 4.17%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 56, 2.78%
Australia
56 publications, 2.78%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 46, 2.28%
Sweden
46 publications, 2.28%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 40, 1.99%
Netherlands
40 publications, 1.99%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 36, 1.79%
Israel
36 publications, 1.79%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 33, 1.64%
Turkey
33 publications, 1.64%
|
China
|
China, 24, 1.19%
China
24 publications, 1.19%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 20, 0.99%
Denmark
20 publications, 0.99%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 20, 0.99%
Singapore
20 publications, 0.99%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 19, 0.94%
Norway
19 publications, 0.94%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 13, 0.65%
Japan
13 publications, 0.65%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 12, 0.6%
Belgium
12 publications, 0.6%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 11, 0.55%
Switzerland
11 publications, 0.55%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 10, 0.5%
Brazil
10 publications, 0.5%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 9, 0.45%
Ireland
9 publications, 0.45%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 9, 0.45%
Finland
9 publications, 0.45%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 8, 0.4%
New Zealand
8 publications, 0.4%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 7, 0.35%
Austria
7 publications, 0.35%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 7, 0.35%
Mexico
7 publications, 0.35%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 7, 0.35%
Republic of Korea
7 publications, 0.35%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 6, 0.3%
South Africa
6 publications, 0.3%
|
India
|
India, 5, 0.25%
India
5 publications, 0.25%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 5, 0.25%
Philippines
5 publications, 0.25%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 5, 0.25%
Czech Republic
5 publications, 0.25%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 4, 0.2%
Spain
4 publications, 0.2%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 3, 0.15%
Russia
3 publications, 0.15%
|
France
|
France, 3, 0.15%
France
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 3, 0.15%
Cyprus
3 publications, 0.15%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 2, 0.1%
Argentina
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 2, 0.1%
Greece
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 2, 0.1%
Georgia
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 2, 0.1%
Egypt
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 2, 0.1%
Lebanon
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 2, 0.1%
Malaysia
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 2, 0.1%
Poland
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Montenegro
|
Montenegro, 2, 0.1%
Montenegro
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.1%
Chile
2 publications, 0.1%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.05%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.05%
Estonia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.05%
Portugal
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.05%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.05%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 1, 0.05%
Indonesia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 1, 0.05%
Iran
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.05%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Kyrgyzstan
|
Kyrgyzstan, 1, 0.05%
Kyrgyzstan
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.05%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.05%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.05%
UAE
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 1, 0.05%
Pakistan
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.05%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.05%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.05%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Show all (26 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|
|
USA
|
USA, 123, 33.88%
USA
123 publications, 33.88%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 74, 20.39%
United Kingdom
74 publications, 20.39%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 38, 10.47%
Germany
38 publications, 10.47%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 24, 6.61%
Sweden
24 publications, 6.61%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 19, 5.23%
Australia
19 publications, 5.23%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 18, 4.96%
Canada
18 publications, 4.96%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 12, 3.31%
Netherlands
12 publications, 3.31%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 12, 3.31%
Turkey
12 publications, 3.31%
|
China
|
China, 10, 2.75%
China
10 publications, 2.75%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 10, 2.75%
Norway
10 publications, 2.75%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 9, 2.48%
Italy
9 publications, 2.48%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 8, 2.2%
Belgium
8 publications, 2.2%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 7, 1.93%
Brazil
7 publications, 1.93%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 7, 1.93%
Israel
7 publications, 1.93%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 7, 1.93%
Switzerland
7 publications, 1.93%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 6, 1.65%
Denmark
6 publications, 1.65%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 4, 1.1%
Singapore
4 publications, 1.1%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 4, 1.1%
Czech Republic
4 publications, 1.1%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 3, 0.83%
Austria
3 publications, 0.83%
|
India
|
India, 3, 0.83%
India
3 publications, 0.83%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 2, 0.55%
Spain
2 publications, 0.55%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 2, 0.55%
Mexico
2 publications, 0.55%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 2, 0.55%
Republic of Korea
2 publications, 0.55%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 2, 0.55%
Finland
2 publications, 0.55%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 2, 0.55%
South Africa
2 publications, 0.55%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 2, 0.55%
Japan
2 publications, 0.55%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.28%
Russia
1 publication, 0.28%
|
France
|
France, 1, 0.28%
France
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.28%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.28%
Portugal
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.28%
Argentina
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 1, 0.28%
Georgia
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.28%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.28%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Kyrgyzstan
|
Kyrgyzstan, 1, 0.28%
Kyrgyzstan
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.28%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.28%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.28%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.28%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 1, 0.28%
New Zealand
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.28%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.28%
Chile
1 publication, 0.28%
|
Show all (11 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
|