Open Access
Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
WOS
Q2
Impact factor
2.4
SJR
0.600
CiteScore
5.9
Categories
Energy (miscellaneous)
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Areas
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Energy
Years of issue
2011-2025
journal names
Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology
J PET EXPLOR PROD TE
Top-3 citing journals

Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology
(1417 citations)

Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
(995 citations)

Energy & Fuels
(712 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Petronas University of Technology
(112 publications)

China University of Petroleum (Beijing)
(79 publications)

China University of Petroleum (East China)
(67 publications)

Petronas University of Technology
(51 publications)

King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
(39 publications)

Southwest Petroleum University
(36 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 483
Q1

Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Stroke Risk Stratification in Atrial Fibrillation
Zimmerman R.M., Hernandez E.J., Tristani-Firouzi M., Yandell M., Steinberg B.A.
Q1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Current risk stratification tools can limit the optimal implementation of new and emerging therapies for patients with heart rhythm disorders. For example, stroke prevention treatments have outpaced means for stroke risk stratification for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques have shown promise for improving various tasks in cardiovascular medicine. Here we explain key concepts in AI that are central to using these technologies for better risk stratification, highlighting one approach particularly well-suited to the task of portable, personalized risk stratification – probabilistic graphical models (PGMs). Probabilistic graphical models can empower physicians to ask and answer a variety of clinical questions, which we demonstrate using a preliminary model of AF-related stroke risk among 1.6 million patients within the University of Utah Health System. This example also highlights the ability of PGMs to combine social determinants of health (SDoH) and other non-traditional variables with standard clinical and demographic ones to improve personalized risk predictions and address risk factor interactions. When combined with electronic health data, these computational technologies hold great promise to empower personalized, explainable, and equitable risk assessment.
Q1

A hybrid algorithm-based ECG risk prediction model for cardiovascular disease
Zhou P., Yang Z., Hao Y., Fan F., Zhao W., Wang Z., Deng Q., Hao Y., Yang N., Han L., Jia P., Qi Y., Zhang Y., Liu J.
Q1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Aims
Little is known about the role of electrocardiography (ECG) in the community population independent of physical and laboratory examinations. Thus, this study developed and validated several ECG-based models for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment, with or without simple questionnaire-based variables.
Methods
Using a derivation cohort of 3,734 Chinese participants aged ≥40 years, we developed the ECG-based models to predict the risk of developing CVD (comprising fatal and non-fatal coronary heart disease, unstable angina, stroke, and heart failure). Candidate predictors associated with CVD were screened from hundreds of ECG characteristics using a hybrid algorithm. By incorporating the questionnaire-based predictors, we constructed the ECG–questionnaire model. All models were tested in an external validation cohort (n = 1,224) to determine their discrimination and calibration.
Results
Over a maximum follow-up of 7 years, 433 CVD events occurred in the derivation cohort. The ECG model with 37 selected features achieved comparable performance to the clinical model using traditional cardiovascular risk factors (C-statistic: 0.690, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.638–0.743) in the external validation cohort. Such performance significantly improved when the questionnaire-based predictors were added (C-statistic: 0.734, 95% CI 0.685–0.784; calibration χ2: 3.334, P = 0.950). Compared with the clinical model, 17.4% of the participants were correctly assigned to the corresponding risk groups, with an absolute integrated discrimination index of 0.048 (95% CI 0.016–0.080).
Conclusions
The ECG model with/without questionnaire-based variables can accurately predict future CVD risk independent of physical and laboratory examinations, suggesting its great potential in routine clinical practice.
Q1

Deep Learning on Electrocardiogram Waveforms to Stratify Risk of Obstructive Stable Coronary Artery Disease
Trivedi R.K., Chiu I., Hughes J.W., Rogers A.J., Ouyang D.
Q1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Aims
Coronary artery disease (CAD) incidence continues to rise with an increasing burden of chronic coronary disease (CCD). Current probability-based risk assessment for obstructive CAD (oCAD) lacks sufficient diagnostic accuracy. We aimed to develop and validate a deep learning (DL) algorithm utilizing electrocardiogram (ECG) waveforms and clinical features to predict oCAD in patients with suspected CCD.
Methods and Results
The study includes subjects undergoing invasive angiography for evaluation of CCD over a 4-year period at a quaternary care center. oCAD was defined as performance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) based on assessment by interventional cardiologists during elective angiography. DL models were developed for ECG waveforms alone (DL-ECG), clinical features from standard risk scores (DL-Clinical), and the combination of ECG waveforms and clinical features (DL-MM); a commonly used pre-test probability estimation tool from the CAD Consortium study was used for comparison (CAD2) [3]. The CAD2 model (AUC 0.733 [0.717-0.750]) had similar performance as the DL-Clinical model (AUC 0.762 [0.746-0.778]). The DL-ECG model (AUC 0.741 [0.726-0.758]) had similar performance as both the clinical feature models. The DL-MM model (AUC 0.807 [0.793-0.822]) had a superior performance. Validation in an external cohort demonstrated similar performance in the DL-MM (AUC 0.716 [0.707-0.726]) and CAD2 risk score (AUC 0.715 [0.705-0.724]).
Conclusion
A multimodality DL model utilizing ECG waveforms and clinical risk factors can improve prediction of oCAD in CCD compared to risk-factor based models. Prospective research is warranted to determine whether incorporating DL methods in ECG analysis improves diagnosis of oCAD and outcomes in CCD.
Q1

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Aortic Stenosis within a Universal Healthcare System Characterised by Natural Language Processing for Targeted Intervention
Biswas D., Wu J., Brown S., Bharucha A., Fairhurst N., Kaye G., Jones K., Copeland F.P., O’Donnell B., Kyle D., Searle T., Pareek N., Dworakowski R., Papachristidis A., Melikian N., et. al.
Q1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Aortic stenosis (AS) is a condition marked by high morbidity and mortality in severe, symptomatic cases without intervention via transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Racial and ethnic disparities in access to these treatments have been documented, particularly in North America, where socioeconomic factors like health insurance confound analyses. This study evaluates disparities in AS management across racial and ethnic groups, accounting for socioeconomic deprivation, using an artificial intelligence framework.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a natural language processing (NLP) pipeline to analyse both structured and unstructured data from > 1 million patients at a London hospital. Key variables included age, sex, self-reported race and ethnicity, AS severity, and socioeconomic status. The primary outcomes were rates of valvular intervention and all-cause mortality.
Results
Among 6,967 AS patients, Black patients were younger, more symptomatic and more comorbid than White patients. Black patients with objective evidence of AS on echocardiography were less likely to receive a clinical diagnosis than White patients. In severe AS, TAVI and SAVR procedures were performed at lower rates among Black patients than White patients, with a longer time to SAVR. In multivariate analysis of severe AS, controlling for socioeconomic status, Black patients experienced higher mortality (HR=1.42, 95% CI=1.05-1.92, P=0.02).
Conclusions
An artificial intelligence framework characterises racial and ethnic disparities in AS management, which persist in a universal healthcare system, highlighting targets for future healthcare interventions.
Q1

Unsupervised Clustering of Single-Lead ECGs Associates with Prevalent and Incident Heart Failure in Coronary Artery Disease
Madrid J., Young W.J., van Duijvenboden S., Orini M., Munroe P.B., Ramírez J., Mincholé A.
Q1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Aims
Clinical consequences of coronary artery disease (CAD) are varied (e.g., atrial fibrillation [AF] and heart failure [HF]) and current risk stratification tools are ineffective. We aimed to identify clusters of individuals with CAD exhibiting unique patterns on the electrocardiogram (ECG) in an unsupervised manner and assess their association with cardiovascular risk.
Methods
Twenty-one ECG markers were derived from single-lead median-beat ECGs of 1,928 individuals with CAD without a previous diagnosis of AF, HF or ventricular arrhythmia (VA) from the imaging study in UK Biobank (CAD-IMG-UKB). An unsupervised clustering algorithm was used to group these markers into distinct clusters. We characterized each cluster according to their demographic and ECG characteristics, as well as their prevalent and incident risk of AF, HF and VA (4-year median follow-up). Validation and association with prevalent diagnoses was performed in an independent cohort of 1,644 individuals.
Results
The model identified two clusters within the CAD-IMG-UKB cohort. Cluster 1 (N=359) exhibited prolonged QRS duration and QT intervals, along with greater morphological variations in QRS and T waves, compared to cluster 2 (N=1,569). Cluster 1, relative to cluster 2, had a significantly higher risk of incident HF (hazard ratio [HR]:2.40, 95%-confidence interval [CI]:1.51-3.83), confirmed by independent validation (HR:1.77, CI:1.31-2.41). It also showed a higher association with prevalent HF (odds ratio:4.10, CI:2.02-8.29), independent of clinical risk factors.
Conclusions
Our approach identified a cluster of individuals with CAD sharing ECG characteristics indicating HF risk, holding significant implications for targeted treatment and prevention enabling accessible large-scale screening.
Q1

Comprehensive full-vessel segmentation and volumetric plaque quantification for intracoronary optical coherence tomography using deep learning
Volleberg R.H., van der Waerden R.G., Luttikholt T.J., van der Zande J.L., Cancian P., Gu X., Mol J., Quax S., Prokop M., Sánchez C.I., van Ginneken B., Išgum I., Thannhauser J., Saitta S., Nishimiya K., et. al.
Q1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Intracoronary optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides detailed information on coronary lesions, but interpretation of OCT images is time-consuming and subject to interobserver variability.
Objectives
To develop and validate a deep learning-based multiclass semantic segmentation algorithm for OCT (OCT-AID).
Methods
A reference standard was obtained through manual multiclass annotation (guidewire artefact, lumen, side branch, intima, media, lipid plaque, calcified plaque, thrombus, plaque rupture, and background) of OCT images from a representative subset of pullbacks from the PECTUS-obs study. Pullbacks were randomly divided into a training and internal test set. An additional independent dataset was used for external testing.
Results
In total, 2808 frames were used for training and 218 for internal testing. The external test set comprised 392 frames. On the internal test set, the mean Dice score across nine classes was 0.659 overall and 0.757 on the true-positive frames, ranging from 0.281 to 0.989 per class. Substantial to almost perfect agreement was achieved for frame-wise identification of both lipid (κ=0.817, 95% CI 0.743-0.891) and calcified plaques (κ=0.795, 95% CI 0.703-0.887). For plaque quantification (e.g. lipid arc, calcium thickness), intraclass correlations of 0.664-0.884 were achieved. In the external test set, κ-values for lipid and calcified plaques were 0.720 (95% CI 0.640-0.800) and 0.851 (95% CI 0.794-0.908), respectively.
Conclusions
The developed multiclass semantic segmentation method for intracoronary OCT images demonstrated promising capabilities for various classes, while having included difficult frames, such as those containing artefacts or destabilized plaques. This algorithm is an important step towards comprehensive and standardized OCT image interpretation.
Q1

Evaluation of real-world application of cardiac implantable electronic device-based multi-sensor algorithm for heart failure management
Llewellyn J., Goode R., Kahn M., Valsecchi S., Rao A.
Q1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Aims
Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices enables pre-emptive management of heart failure (HF) without additional patient engagement. The HeartLogic™ algorithm in implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) combines physiological parameters to predict HF events, facilitating earlier interventions. This study evaluated its diagnostic performance and resource implications within an HF management service.
Methods and results
In a single-centre study, 212 patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy ICDs (CRT-Ds) were monitored for 12-months. During follow-up, 18 (8%) patients died, and 15 HF hospitalizations occurred in 13 (6%) patients. Outpatient visits totalled 37 in 34 (16%) patients. HeartLogic™ alerts occurred in 58% of patients, with 100% sensitivity for HF-related hospitalizations. The positive predictive value was 29% including only alerts associated with HF events, while it was 51% including HF events and explained alerts. Unexplained alert rate was 0.46 per patient-year. Clinical interventions, mainly medication adjustments, followed 82 alerts. Total management time was 257 h/year, equivalent to 0.57 full-time equivalents for managing 1000 CRT-D patients.
Conclusion
The integration of HeartLogic™ into routine care demonstrated its utility in optimizing HF management, improving healthcare resource allocation. The algorithm can enhance proactive patient management and provide holistic care within the existing healthcare infrastructure.
Q1

Identifying Heart Failure Dynamics Using Multi-Point Electrocardiograms and Deep Learning
Nishihara Y., Nishimori M., Shibata S., Shinohara M., Hirata K., Tanaka H.
Q1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Aims
Heart failure (HF) hospitalizations are associated with poor survival outcomes, emphasizing the need for early intervention. Deep learning algorithms have shown promise in HF detection through electrocardiogram (ECG), However, their utility in ongoing HF monitoring remains uncertain. This study developed a deep learning model using 12-lead ECGs collected at two different time points to evaluate HF status changes, aiming to enhance early intervention and continuous monitoring in various healthcare settings.
Methods and Results
We analyzed 30,171 ECGs from 6,531 adult patients at Kobe University Hospital. The participants were randomly assigned to training, validation, and test datasets. A Transformer-based model was developed to classify HF status into deteriorated, improved, and no-change classes based on ECG waveform signals at two different time points. Performance metrics, such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and accuracy, were calculated, and attention mapping via gradient-weighted class activation mapping was utilized to interpret the model's decision-making ability. The patients had an average age of 64.6 years (±15.4 years), brain natriuretic peptide of 66.3 pg/mL (24.6 to 175.1 pg/mL). For HF status classification, the model achieved an AUROC of 0.889 (95% CI: 0.879–0.898) and an accuracy of 0.871 (95% CI: 0.864–0.878).
Conclusions
Transformer-based deep learning model demonstrated high accuracy in detecting HF status changes, highlighting its potential as a non-invasive, efficient tool for HF monitoring. The reliance of the model on ECGs reduces the need for invasive, costly diagnostics, aligning with clinical needs for accessible HF management.
Q1

Eco-Conscious Healthcare: Merging Clinical Efficacy with Sustainability
Scholte N.T., van der Boon R.M.
Q1

Examination of the performance of machine learning-based automated coronary plaque characterization by NIRS-IVUS and OCT with histology
Bajaj R., Parasa R., Broersen A., Johnson T., Garg M., Prati F., Çap M., Lecaros Yap N.A., Karaduman M., Busk C.A., Grainger S., White S., Mathur A., García-García H.M., Dijkstra J., et. al.
Q1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Aims
Near-infrared spectroscopy-intravascular ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) can assess coronary plaque pathology but are limited by time-consuming and expertise-driven image analysis. Recently introduced machine learning(ML)-classifiers have expedited image processing, but their performance in assessing plaque pathology against histological standards remains unclear. The aim of this study is to assess the performance of NIRS-IVUS-ML-based and OCT-ML-based plaque characterization against a histological standard.
Methods and Results
Matched histological and NIRS-IVUS/OCT frames from human cadaveric hearts were manually annotated and fibrotic(FT), calcific(Ca) and necrotic core(NC) regions-of-interest(ROIs) were identified. NIRS-IVUS and OCT frames were processed by their respective ML-classifiers to segment and characterize plaque components. The histologically-defined ROIs were overlaid onto corresponding NIRS-IVUS/OCT frames and the ML-classifier estimations compared with histology.
In total 131 pairs of NIRS-IVUS/histology and 184 pairs of OCT/histology were included. The agreement of NIRS-IVUS-ML with histology (concordance correlation coefficient(CCC) 0.81 and 0.88) was superior to OCT-ML (CCC 0.64 and 0.73) for the plaque area and burden. Plaque compositional analysis showed a substantial agreement of the NIRS-IVUS-ML with histology for FT, Ca and NC ROIs (CCC: 0.73, 0.75 and 0.66, respectively) while the agreement of the OCT-ML with histology was 0.42, 0.62 and 0.13, respectively. The overall accuracy of NIRS-IVUS-ML and OCT-ML for characterizing atheroma types was 83% and 72%, respectively.
Conclusions
NIRS-IVUS-ML plaque compositional analysis has a good performance in assessing plaque components while OCT-ML performs well for the FT, moderately for the Ca and has weak performance in detecting NC tissue. This may be attributable to limitations of standalone intravascular imaging and to the fact that the OCT-ML classifier was trained on human experts rather than histological standards.
Q1

Feasibility, safety and patient perceptions of exercise-based cardiac telerehabilitation in a multicentre real-world setting after myocardial infarction – the Remote Exercise SWEDEHEART study
Bäck M., Leosdottir M., Ekström M., Hambraeus K., Ravn-Fischer A., Borg S., Brosved M., Flink M., Hedin K., Lans C., Olovsson J., Urell C., Öberg B., James S.
Q1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Cardiac telerehabilitation addresses common barriers for attendance at exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (EBCR). Pragmatic real-world studies are however lacking, limiting generalisability of available evidence. We aimed to evaluate feasibility, safety, and patient perceptions of remotely delivered EBCR in a multicentre clinical practice setting after myocardial infarction (MI).
Methods
This study included 232 post-MI patients (63.7 years, 77.5% men) from 23 cardiac rehabilitation centres in Sweden (2020-2022). Exercise was delivered twice per week for three months through a real-time group-based video meeting connecting a physiotherapist to patients exercising at home. Outcomes were assessed before and after remote EBCR completion and comprised assessment of physical fitness, self-reported physical activity and exercise, physical capacity, kinesiophobia, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), self-efficacy for exercise, exercise adherence, patient acceptance. Safety monitoring in terms of adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) was recorded.
Results
A total of 67.2% of the patients attended ≥ 75% of prescribed exercise sessions. Significant improvements in physical fitness, self-reported exercise, physical capacity, kinesiophobia, and HRQoL were observed. Patients agreed that remote EBCR improved health care access (83%), was easy to use (94%) and found exercise performance and interaction acceptable (95%). Sixteen exercise-related AEs (most commonly dizziness and musculoskeletal symptoms) were registered, all of which were resolved. Two SAEs requiring hospitalization were reported, both unrelated to exercise.
Conclusions
This multicentre study supports remote EBCR post-MI as feasible and safe with a high patient acceptance in a real-world setting. The clinical effectiveness needs to be confirmed in a randomised controlled trial.
Trial registration number
NCT04260958.
Q1

The environmental impact of telemonitoring versus on-site cardiac follow-up: a mixed-method study
van Bree E.M., Snijder L.E., ter Haak S., Atsma D.E., Brakema E.A.
Q1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Aims
Digital health technologies are considered promising innovations to reduce healthcare’s environmental footprint. However, this assumption remains largely unstudied. We compared the environmental impact of telemonitoring and care on site (CoS) in post-myocardial infarction (MI) follow-up and explored how it influenced patients’ and healthcare professionals’ (HPs) perceptions of using telemonitoring.
Methods
We conducted a mixed-method study; a standardised life cycle assessment and qualitative interviews and focus groups. We studied the environmental impact of resource use per patient for one-year post-MI follow-up in a Dutch academic hospital, as CoS or partially via telemonitoring. We used the Environmental Footprint 3.1 method. Qualitative data were analysed using Thematic Analysis.
Results
The environmental impact of telemonitoring was larger than CoS for all impact categories, including global warming (+480%) and mineral/metal resource use (+4,390%). Production of telemonitoring devices contributed most of the environmental burden (89%). Telemonitoring and CoS achieved parity in most impact categories at 65 km one-way patient car commute. HPs and patients did not consider the environmental impact in their preference for telemonitoring, as the patient’s individual health was their primary concern – especially after a cardiac event. However, patients and HPs were generally positive towards sustainable healthcare and willing to use telemonitoring more sustainably.
Conclusion
Telemonitoring had a substantially bigger environmental impact than CoS in the studied setting. Patient commute distance, reuse of devices, and tailored use of devices should be considered when implementing telemonitoring for clinical follow-up. Patients and HPs supported these solutions to enhance sustainability-informed cardiovascular care as the default option.
Q1

Sudden cardiac arrest prediction via deep learning electrocardiogram analysis
Oberdier M.T., Neri L., Orro A., Carrick R.T., Nobile M.S., Jaipalli S., Khan M., Diciotti S., Borghi C., Halperin H.R.
Q1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Aims
Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is a commonly fatal event that often occurs without prior indications. To improve outcomes and enable preventative strategies, the electrocardiogram (ECG) in conjunction with deep learning was explored as a potential screening tool.
Methods and results
A publicly available data set containing 10 s of 12-lead ECGs from individuals who did and did not have an SCA, information about time from ECG to arrest, and age and sex was utilized for analysis to individually predict SCA or not using deep convolution neural network models. The base model that included age and sex, ECGs within 1 day prior to arrest, and data sampled from windows of 720 ms around the R-waves from 221 individuals with SCA and 1046 controls had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.77. With sensitivity set at 95%, base model specificity was 31%, which is not clinically applicable. Gradient-weighted class activation mapping showed that the model mostly relied on the QRS complex to make predictions. However, models with ECGs recorded between 1 day to 1 month and 1 month to 1 year prior to arrest demonstrated predictive capabilities.
Conclusion
Deep learning models processing ECG data are a promising means of screening for SCA, and this method explains differences in SCAs due to age and sex. Model performance improved when ECGs were nearer in time to SCAs, although ECG data up to a year prior had predictive value. Sudden cardiac arrest prediction was more dependent upon QRS complex data compared to other ECG segments.
Q1

Siamese neural network-enhanced electrocardiography can re-identify anonymised healthcare data
Macierzanka K., Sau A., Patlatzoglou K., Pastika L., Sieliwonczyk E., Gurnani M., Peters N.S., Waks J.W., Kramer D.B., Ng F.S.
Q1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
Abstract
Aims
Many research databases with anonymised patient data contain electrocardiograms (ECGs) from which traditional identifiers have been removed. We evaluated the ability of artificial intelligence (AI) methods to determine the similarity between ECGs and assessed whether they have the potential to be misused to re-identify individuals from anonymised datasets.
Methods and results
We utilised a convolutional Siamese neural network (SNN) architecture, which derives a Euclidean distance similarity metric between two input ECGs. A secondary care dataset of 864,283 ECGs (72,455 subjects) was used. SNN-ECG achieves an accuracy of 91.68% when classifying between 2,689,124 same-subject pairs and 2,689,124 different-subject pairs. This performance increases to 93.61% and 95.97% in outpatient and normal ECG subsets. In a simulated ‘motivated intruder’ test, SNN-ECG can identify individuals from large datasets. In datasets of 100, 1,000, 10,000 and 20,000 ECGs, where only one ECG is also from the reference individual, it achieves success rates of 79.2%, 62.6%, 45.0% and 40.0%, respectively. If this was random, the success would be 1%, 0.1%, 0.01% and 0.005%, respectively. Additional basic information, like subject sex or age-range, enhances performance further. We also found that, on the subject level, ECG pair similarity is clinically relevant; greater ECG dissimilarity associates with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.22 (1.21-1.23), p < 0.0001) and is additive to an AI-ECG model trained for mortality prediction.
Conclusion
Anonymised ECGs retain information that may facilitate subject re-identification, raising privacy and data protection concerns. However, SNN-ECG models also have positive uses and can enhance risk prediction of cardiovascular disease.
Top-100
Citing journals
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
|
|
Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology
1417 citations, 6.93%
|
|
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
995 citations, 4.87%
|
|
Energy & Fuels
712 citations, 3.48%
|
|
Energies
576 citations, 2.82%
|
|
Geoenergy Science and Engineering
573 citations, 2.8%
|
|
Fuel
482 citations, 2.36%
|
|
ACS Omega
428 citations, 2.09%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Liquids
411 citations, 2.01%
|
|
Processes
306 citations, 1.5%
|
|
Arabian Journal of Geosciences
302 citations, 1.48%
|
|
Scientific Reports
278 citations, 1.36%
|
|
Petroleum Science and Technology
267 citations, 1.31%
|
|
Marine and Petroleum Geology
214 citations, 1.05%
|
|
SPE Journal
205 citations, 1%
|
|
Journal of African Earth Sciences
172 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
168 citations, 0.82%
|
|
Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
166 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
164 citations, 0.8%
|
|
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering
164 citations, 0.8%
|
|
Petroleum Science
163 citations, 0.8%
|
|
Energy Reports
160 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Petroleum Research
134 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Geofluids
118 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Polymers
117 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Frontiers in Earth Science
113 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Physics of Fluids
112 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Petroleum
104 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
103 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Energy
100 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Heliyon
98 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Transactions of the ASME
97 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Natural Resources Research
96 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Minerals
85 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering
83 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology
82 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources
79 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Energy Geoscience
78 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Journal of Applied Geophysics
76 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Chemical Papers
66 citations, 0.32%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
64 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
64 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering
63 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Sustainability
63 citations, 0.31%
|
|
AIP Conference Proceedings
63 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Gas Science and Engineering
63 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
62 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Gels
58 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of Applied Polymer Science
57 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects
57 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Results in Engineering
57 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
56 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Materials
56 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
55 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Earth Science Informatics
53 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Chemical Engineering Journal
53 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Geophysics
52 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Molecules
50 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Construction and Building Materials
50 citations, 0.24%
|
|
SN Applied Sciences
49 citations, 0.24%
|
|
IEEE Access
48 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Environmental Earth Sciences
47 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Carbonates and Evaporites
47 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
47 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Petroleum Exploration and Development
45 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Langmuir
43 citations, 0.21%
|
|
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
42 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Frontiers in Energy Research
42 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Chemical Engineering Research and Design
42 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Transport in Porous Media
42 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Materials Today: Proceedings
42 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Chemical Engineering Science
41 citations, 0.2%
|
|
SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering
41 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Powder Technology
39 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Nanomaterials
38 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Petroleum Chemistry
38 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Geosystem Engineering
37 citations, 0.18%
|
|
RSC Advances
36 citations, 0.18%
|
|
E3S Web of Conferences
36 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
35 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Acta Geophysica
35 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Geological Journal
35 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
35 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Applied Energy
34 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Energy Science and Engineering
34 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Sensors
34 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
34 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry
33 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Sedimentary Environments
33 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Asian Earth Sciences
32 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Oil and Gas Science and Technology
32 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Advances in Colloid and Interface Science
32 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Minings Sciences
32 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
31 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Interpretation
31 citations, 0.15%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
30 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Water (Switzerland)
30 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Carbohydrate Polymers
29 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Geothermics
28 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Science of the Total Environment
28 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Geosciences (Switzerland)
28 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
|
Citing publishers
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
|
|
Elsevier
6814 citations, 33.33%
|
|
Springer Nature
4300 citations, 21.04%
|
|
MDPI
1941 citations, 9.5%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
1406 citations, 6.88%
|
|
Society of Petroleum Engineers
1370 citations, 6.7%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
689 citations, 3.37%
|
|
Wiley
613 citations, 3%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
229 citations, 1.12%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
215 citations, 1.05%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
214 citations, 1.05%
|
|
AIP Publishing
208 citations, 1.02%
|
|
IOP Publishing
198 citations, 0.97%
|
|
125 citations, 0.61%
|
|
ASME International
109 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
104 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
100 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
94 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
76 citations, 0.37%
|
|
SAGE
75 citations, 0.37%
|
|
IntechOpen
68 citations, 0.33%
|
|
EDP Sciences
48 citations, 0.23%
|
|
47 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Oxford University Press
46 citations, 0.23%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
38 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Editions Technip
34 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
33 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Emerald
32 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Korean Society of Industrial Engineering Chemistry
31 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute
29 citations, 0.14%
|
|
World Scientific
28 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
26 citations, 0.13%
|
|
King Saud University
26 citations, 0.13%
|
|
25 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
24 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Geological Society of London
24 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Saint-Petersburg Mining University
21 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Begell House
20 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Higher Education Press
20 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IGI Global
20 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Tech Science Press
19 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
17 citations, 0.08%
|
|
GeoScienceWorld
17 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
15 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Chinese Academy of Sciences
14 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Georesursy LLC
14 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Tyumen State University
13 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
12 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering
12 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Geophysical Union
12 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
12 citations, 0.06%
|
|
IWA Publishing
11 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
10 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IOS Press
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Ufa State Petroleum Technological University
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Ecopetrol
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Geological Society of America
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Copernicus
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Thomas Telford
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Royal Society
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Hans Publishers
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Industrial University of Tyumen
7 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Ural Federal University
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Academic Publication Council - Kuwait University
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Lviv Polytechnic National University
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Ain Shams University
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Alexandria University
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Electrochemical Society
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
National University of Science & Technology (MISiS)
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Institut za Istrazivanja I Projektovanja u Privredi
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japan Petroleum Institute
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
ASTM International
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Universitas Gadjah Mada
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Scientific Publishers
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academic Journals
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Samara National Research University
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Society of Rheology
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
International OCSCO World Press
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
International Research and Training Centre on Erosion and Sedimentation
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Polymer Society of Korea
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Science in China Press
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
National Library of Serbia
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Irkutsk National Research Technical University
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Scientific Publishers
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
|
Publishing organizations
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
|
Petronas University of Technology
112 publications, 5.96%
|
|
China University of Petroleum (Beijing)
79 publications, 4.2%
|
|
China University of Petroleum (East China)
67 publications, 3.57%
|
|
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
64 publications, 3.41%
|
|
Petroleum University of Technology Iran
52 publications, 2.77%
|
|
Southwest Petroleum University
50 publications, 2.66%
|
|
Yangtze University
49 publications, 2.61%
|
|
Northeast Petroleum University
42 publications, 2.24%
|
|
University of Tehran
41 publications, 2.18%
|
|
Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch
33 publications, 1.76%
|
|
Amirkabir University of Technology
32 publications, 1.7%
|
|
Islamic Azad University, Tehran
28 publications, 1.49%
|
|
Research Institute of Petroleum Industry Tehran
26 publications, 1.38%
|
|
China University of Geosciences (Wuhan)
26 publications, 1.38%
|
|
Xi'an Shiyou University
25 publications, 1.33%
|
|
Cairo University
24 publications, 1.28%
|
|
Sharif University of Technology
22 publications, 1.17%
|
|
Curtin University
22 publications, 1.17%
|
|
Covenant University
21 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Missouri University of Science and Technology
21 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Saudi Aramco
20 publications, 1.06%
|
|
Federal University of Technology Owerri
20 publications, 1.06%
|
|
Khalifa University
19 publications, 1.01%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
19 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
19 publications, 1.01%
|
|
University of Port Harcourt
19 publications, 1.01%
|
|
University of Calgary
19 publications, 1.01%
|
|
University of Technology, Malaysia
18 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Shiraz University
17 publications, 0.9%
|
|
University of Petroleum and Energy Studies
17 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Pandit Deendayal Energy University
17 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines) Dhanbad
16 publications, 0.85%
|
|
University of Stavanger
16 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute
16 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
15 publications, 0.8%
|
|
Bandung Institute of Technology
15 publications, 0.8%
|
|
University of Tabriz
14 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Northwest University
14 publications, 0.75%
|
|
American University in Cairo
14 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Baghdad
13 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Persian Gulf University
13 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Peshawar
12 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Shahrood University of technology
12 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Sahand University of Technology
12 publications, 0.64%
|
|
China University of Mining and Technology
12 publications, 0.64%
|
|
Kuwait University
12 publications, 0.64%
|
|
University of Ibadan
12 publications, 0.64%
|
|
University of Lagos
12 publications, 0.64%
|
|
King Saud University
11 publications, 0.59%
|
|
NED University of Engineering and Technology
11 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Petronas)
11 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Obafemi Awolowo University
11 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Nazarbayev University
10 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Tarbiat Modares University
10 publications, 0.53%
|
|
United Arab Emirates University
10 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz
10 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Chongqing University of Science and Technology
10 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
10 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Texas Tech University
10 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Damietta University
10 publications, 0.53%
|
|
University of Basrah
9 publications, 0.48%
|
|
China University of Geosciences (Beijing)
9 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Shandong University of Science and Technology
9 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Chongqing University
9 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Edith Cowan University
9 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of the Western Cape
9 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Federal University of Technology Akure
9 publications, 0.48%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
9 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Kyushu University
9 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Kazan Federal University
8 publications, 0.43%
|
|
King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology
8 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
8 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Soran University
8 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Dibrugarh University
8 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Afe Babalola University
8 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Ekiti State University
8 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Texas A&M University
8 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Suez University
8 publications, 0.43%
|
|
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Iran University of Science and Technology
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Eindhoven University of Technology
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Sultan Qaboos University
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Chengdu University of Technology
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of KwaZulu-Natal
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Federal University Oye Ekiti
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Henan Polytechnic University
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Trinidad and Tobago
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Tanta University
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Louisiana State University
7 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Saint Petersburg Mining University
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
King Abdulaziz University
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
King Faisal University
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Banaras Hindu University
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Qatar University
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Texas A&M University at Qatar
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Australian College of Kuwait
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research
6 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
Petronas University of Technology
51 publications, 4.8%
|
|
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
39 publications, 3.67%
|
|
Southwest Petroleum University
36 publications, 3.39%
|
|
University of Tehran
33 publications, 3.11%
|
|
China University of Petroleum (Beijing)
33 publications, 3.11%
|
|
China University of Petroleum (East China)
31 publications, 2.92%
|
|
Yangtze University
25 publications, 2.35%
|
|
Amirkabir University of Technology
21 publications, 1.98%
|
|
Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch
20 publications, 1.88%
|
|
Northeast Petroleum University
20 publications, 1.88%
|
|
Islamic Azad University, Tehran
19 publications, 1.79%
|
|
Petroleum University of Technology Iran
19 publications, 1.79%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
19 publications, 1.79%
|
|
Xi'an Shiyou University
18 publications, 1.69%
|
|
University of Tabriz
13 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Cairo University
13 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Saudi Aramco
12 publications, 1.13%
|
|
University of Stavanger
12 publications, 1.13%
|
|
American University in Cairo
12 publications, 1.13%
|
|
Federal University of Technology Owerri
12 publications, 1.13%
|
|
China University of Mining and Technology
11 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Shahrood University of technology
10 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Baghdad
10 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Northwest University
10 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Covenant University
10 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Damietta University
10 publications, 0.94%
|
|
University of Peshawar
9 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines) Dhanbad
9 publications, 0.85%
|
|
University of Basrah
9 publications, 0.85%
|
|
University of Petroleum and Energy Studies
9 publications, 0.85%
|
|
University of Technology, Malaysia
9 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Chongqing University
9 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
9 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Curtin University
9 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Kazan Federal University
8 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Sahand University of Technology
8 publications, 0.75%
|
|
China University of Geosciences (Wuhan)
8 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
8 publications, 0.75%
|
|
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Tarbiat Modares University
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Khalifa University
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Shiraz University
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
NED University of Engineering and Technology
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Kuwait University
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Shandong University of Science and Technology
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Chengdu University of Technology
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Edith Cowan University
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Port Harcourt
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Obafemi Awolowo University
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Trinidad and Tobago
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Missouri University of Science and Technology
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Calgary
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Nazarbayev University
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Research Institute of Petroleum Industry Tehran
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Texas A&M University at Qatar
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Pandit Deendayal Energy University
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Malaya
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
China University of Geosciences (Beijing)
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Chongqing University of Science and Technology
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Bandung Institute of Technology
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Ibadan
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of Lagos
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Henan Polytechnic University
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Tanta University
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Texas Tech University
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Taiz University
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Suez University
6 publications, 0.56%
|
|
King Abdulaziz University
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
King Faisal University
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Sharif University of Technology
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Abdul Wali Khan University
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Soran University
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Yazd University
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Tsinghua University
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Qatar University
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Petronas)
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of KwaZulu-Natal
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of the Western Cape
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Benin
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Federal University of Pernambuco
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Jagiellonian University
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
United Arab Emirates University
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Iran University of Science and Technology
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Payame Noor University
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz Branch
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Semnan University
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Swabi
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Persian Gulf University
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Afe Babalola University
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Usmanu Danfodiyo University Sokoto
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Ekiti State University
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Adekunle Ajasin University
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Michael Okpara University of Agriculture
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Seoul National University
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Pan-Atlantic University
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
|
China
|
China, 517, 27.51%
China
517 publications, 27.51%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 279, 14.85%
Iran
279 publications, 14.85%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 167, 8.89%
Malaysia
167 publications, 8.89%
|
USA
|
USA, 166, 8.83%
USA
166 publications, 8.83%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 160, 8.52%
Nigeria
160 publications, 8.52%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 109, 5.8%
Saudi Arabia
109 publications, 5.8%
|
India
|
India, 91, 4.84%
India
91 publications, 4.84%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 89, 4.74%
Egypt
89 publications, 4.74%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 59, 3.14%
Canada
59 publications, 3.14%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 57, 3.03%
Iraq
57 publications, 3.03%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 56, 2.98%
Pakistan
56 publications, 2.98%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 50, 2.66%
Australia
50 publications, 2.66%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 48, 2.55%
United Kingdom
48 publications, 2.55%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 42, 2.24%
Norway
42 publications, 2.24%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 41, 2.18%
Brazil
41 publications, 2.18%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 37, 1.97%
Russia
37 publications, 1.97%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 36, 1.92%
UAE
36 publications, 1.92%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 28, 1.49%
Indonesia
28 publications, 1.49%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 25, 1.33%
Kuwait
25 publications, 1.33%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 18, 0.96%
South Africa
18 publications, 0.96%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 17, 0.9%
Brunei
17 publications, 0.9%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 15, 0.8%
Netherlands
15 publications, 0.8%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 15, 0.8%
Japan
15 publications, 0.8%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 14, 0.75%
Kazakhstan
14 publications, 0.75%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 14, 0.75%
Ghana
14 publications, 0.75%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 13, 0.69%
Qatar
13 publications, 0.69%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 13, 0.69%
Oman
13 publications, 0.69%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 12, 0.64%
Algeria
12 publications, 0.64%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 12, 0.64%
Bangladesh
12 publications, 0.64%
|
France
|
France, 11, 0.59%
France
11 publications, 0.59%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 11, 0.59%
Turkey
11 publications, 0.59%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 10, 0.53%
Republic of Korea
10 publications, 0.53%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 9, 0.48%
Vietnam
9 publications, 0.48%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 9, 0.48%
Cameroon
9 publications, 0.48%
|
Trinidad and Tobago
|
Trinidad and Tobago, 9, 0.48%
Trinidad and Tobago
9 publications, 0.48%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 8, 0.43%
Germany
8 publications, 0.43%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 8, 0.43%
Colombia
8 publications, 0.43%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 8, 0.43%
Thailand
8 publications, 0.43%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 7, 0.37%
Austria
7 publications, 0.37%
|
Yemen
|
Yemen, 7, 0.37%
Yemen
7 publications, 0.37%
|
Azerbaijan
|
Azerbaijan, 6, 0.32%
Azerbaijan
6 publications, 0.32%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 6, 0.32%
Poland
6 publications, 0.32%
|
Sudan
|
Sudan, 6, 0.32%
Sudan
6 publications, 0.32%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 5, 0.27%
Denmark
5 publications, 0.27%
|
Libya
|
Libya, 5, 0.27%
Libya
5 publications, 0.27%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 4, 0.21%
Tunisia
4 publications, 0.21%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 4, 0.21%
Sri Lanka
4 publications, 0.21%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 3, 0.16%
Argentina
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 3, 0.16%
Hungary
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 3, 0.16%
Italy
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 3, 0.16%
Romania
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 3, 0.16%
Tanzania
3 publications, 0.16%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 2, 0.11%
Portugal
2 publications, 0.11%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 2, 0.11%
Spain
2 publications, 0.11%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 2, 0.11%
Kenya
2 publications, 0.11%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 2, 0.11%
Lebanon
2 publications, 0.11%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 2, 0.11%
Mexico
2 publications, 0.11%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 2, 0.11%
Singapore
2 publications, 0.11%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 2, 0.11%
Sweden
2 publications, 0.11%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 2, 0.11%
Ecuador
2 publications, 0.11%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.05%
Ukraine
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.05%
Belgium
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 1, 0.05%
Venezuela
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.05%
Greece
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.05%
Israel
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.05%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.05%
Cyprus
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Niger
|
Niger, 1, 0.05%
Niger
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Rwanda
|
Rwanda, 1, 0.05%
Rwanda
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Syria
|
Syria, 1, 0.05%
Syria
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Chad
|
Chad, 1, 0.05%
Chad
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.05%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Show all (42 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
|
China
|
China, 308, 29%
China
308 publications, 29%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 166, 15.63%
Iran
166 publications, 15.63%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 83, 7.82%
Nigeria
83 publications, 7.82%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 81, 7.63%
Malaysia
81 publications, 7.63%
|
USA
|
USA, 72, 6.78%
USA
72 publications, 6.78%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 65, 6.12%
Saudi Arabia
65 publications, 6.12%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 59, 5.56%
Egypt
59 publications, 5.56%
|
India
|
India, 43, 4.05%
India
43 publications, 4.05%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 42, 3.95%
Pakistan
42 publications, 3.95%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 38, 3.58%
Iraq
38 publications, 3.58%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 31, 2.92%
Brazil
31 publications, 2.92%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 26, 2.45%
Russia
26 publications, 2.45%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 25, 2.35%
Australia
25 publications, 2.35%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 24, 2.26%
Canada
24 publications, 2.26%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 23, 2.17%
Norway
23 publications, 2.17%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 20, 1.88%
United Kingdom
20 publications, 1.88%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 15, 1.41%
UAE
15 publications, 1.41%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 14, 1.32%
Kuwait
14 publications, 1.32%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 12, 1.13%
Qatar
12 publications, 1.13%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 11, 1.04%
Indonesia
11 publications, 1.04%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 11, 1.04%
South Africa
11 publications, 1.04%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 10, 0.94%
Brunei
10 publications, 0.94%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 9, 0.85%
Kazakhstan
9 publications, 0.85%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 9, 0.85%
Algeria
9 publications, 0.85%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 9, 0.85%
Bangladesh
9 publications, 0.85%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 8, 0.75%
Ghana
8 publications, 0.75%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 8, 0.75%
Republic of Korea
8 publications, 0.75%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 7, 0.66%
Germany
7 publications, 0.66%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 7, 0.66%
Oman
7 publications, 0.66%
|
Trinidad and Tobago
|
Trinidad and Tobago, 7, 0.66%
Trinidad and Tobago
7 publications, 0.66%
|
Yemen
|
Yemen, 6, 0.56%
Yemen
6 publications, 0.56%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 6, 0.56%
Colombia
6 publications, 0.56%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 6, 0.56%
Poland
6 publications, 0.56%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 6, 0.56%
Japan
6 publications, 0.56%
|
France
|
France, 5, 0.47%
France
5 publications, 0.47%
|
Azerbaijan
|
Azerbaijan, 5, 0.47%
Azerbaijan
5 publications, 0.47%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 5, 0.47%
Vietnam
5 publications, 0.47%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 5, 0.47%
Cameroon
5 publications, 0.47%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 5, 0.47%
Netherlands
5 publications, 0.47%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 5, 0.47%
Turkey
5 publications, 0.47%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 4, 0.38%
Austria
4 publications, 0.38%
|
Libya
|
Libya, 4, 0.38%
Libya
4 publications, 0.38%
|
Sudan
|
Sudan, 4, 0.38%
Sudan
4 publications, 0.38%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 4, 0.38%
Thailand
4 publications, 0.38%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 3, 0.28%
Denmark
3 publications, 0.28%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 2, 0.19%
Argentina
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 2, 0.19%
Italy
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 2, 0.19%
Kenya
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 0.19%
Romania
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 2, 0.19%
Singapore
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 2, 0.19%
Tanzania
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 2, 0.19%
Tunisia
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 2, 0.19%
Sri Lanka
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.09%
Belgium
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.09%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.09%
Greece
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.09%
Israel
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.09%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 1, 0.09%
Spain
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.09%
Cyprus
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Niger
|
Niger, 1, 0.09%
Niger
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Rwanda
|
Rwanda, 1, 0.09%
Rwanda
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Chad
|
Chad, 1, 0.09%
Chad
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.09%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 1, 0.09%
Sweden
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 1, 0.09%
Ecuador
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Show all (36 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
|
5 profile journal articles
Javed Dr
🥼 🤝
PhD in Engineering, Associate Professor

NED University of Engineering and Technology
29 publications,
243 citations
h-index: 8
Research interests
Computer Engineering
Energy
Engineering education
Petroleum Geology
4 profile journal articles
Riahi Mohammad Ali
🥼
PhD in Geological and Earth sciences, Professor of the Academy of Sciences of Iran
16 publications,
87 citations
h-index: 6
Research interests
Geophysics
Petroleum Geology
2 profile journal articles
Karmakar P G

Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
15 publications,
333 citations
h-index: 7
2 profile journal articles
Shafiq Nasir

Petronas University of Technology
235 publications,
3 828 citations
h-index: 32
1 profile journal article
Naseer Muhammad
41 publications,
427 citations
h-index: 12
1 profile journal article
Komati Karin
25 publications,
50 citations
h-index: 5