Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
journal names
Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
Top-3 citing journals

RSC Advances
(2832 citations)

Journal of Alloys and Compounds
(1935 citations)

Applied Surface Science
(1817 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Sungkyunkwan University
(403 publications)

Hanyang University
(318 publications)

Chonnam National University
(270 publications)

Sungkyunkwan University
(42 publications)

Kyungpook National University
(39 publications)

Gachon University
(38 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 385

Acute Pancreatitis (A Clinical Case)
Khripun A.I., Alimov A.N., Orlov S.Y., Chelyapina T.P.
ntroduction. The diagnosis of acute pancreatitis poses no significant difficulties. Nonetheless, accurately predicting the potential severity of the disease during its early stages remains a challenge with existing diagnostic methods. Delayed diagnosis of pancreatic necrosis and the late initiation of intensive therapy contribute to a more severe disease course.Materials and methods. The paper presents a case of recurrent choledocholithiasis as a complicating factor in acute biliary pancreatitis in a 58-year-old woman. A standardized technique of endoscopic ultrasound allowed for the timely identification of signs indicative of developing pancreatic necrosis, enabling the prevention of its progression through papillary sphincterotomy, choledocholithotripsy, and pancreatic stenting.Results and discussion. Endosonographic features of pancreatic necrosis are visualizable in the early stages of acute pancreatitis. Changes such as Wirsung duct dilation and hypoechoic lesions in the pancreatic parenchyma provide grounds for pancreatic duct stenting with an expected clinical efficacy. The performance of endoscopic retrograde interventions in acute pancreatitis, including pancreatic stenting in particular, can halt the progression of pancreatic necrosis and contribute to a more rapid clinical and laboratory recovery.Conclusion. The presented case demonstrates the high informativeness and effectiveness of endoscopic methods in the early diagnosis and treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis.

Analysis of the Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Surgical Interventions in Chronic Complicated Forms of Colonic Diverticulitis
Itkulov A.F., Ibatullin A.A., Baikov D.E., Eybov R.R., Timerbulatov M.V.
Introduction. Diverticular disease refers to common non-neoplastic diseases of the colon, accounting for 30–60% of all pathologies of the organ. According to clinical guidelines, the treatment strategy for complicated forms of diverticulitis is predominantly conservative. However, certain forms of chronic complicated diverticulitis require surgical intervention, particularly sigmoid resection.Materials and methods. The study involved a retrospective analysis of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open sigmoid resections for chronic complicated forms of diverticular disease of the colon. From 2014 to 2023, a total of 85 patients underwent surgery at the Clinic of Bashkir State Medical University. In Group 1, 24 patients (28.3%) underwent surgery, in Group 2 — 28 patients (32.9%), and in Group 3 — 33 (38.8%). The results were processed using mathematical statistical methods, MS Excel XP, and Statistica 10.0 software.Results and discussion. The comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgical interventions and open surgeries revealed that the application of minimally invasive surgery, specifically robot-assisted and laparoscopic approaches, is associated with reduced hospital stay and fewer postoperative complications compared to similar metrics observed with open surgical procedures.Conclusion. The study findings indicate the advantages of robot-assisted surgeries in certain cases, which, as an alternative method, do not fall short of traditional laparoscopic surgical techniques. Moreover, robot-assisted interventions are associated with earlier postoperative recovery and reduced hospital stay.

Safety of the Off-Label Use of Antitumor Drugs in Real Clinical Practice: Experience of Oncologists of the Russian Federation
Каrabina E.V., Sakaeva D.D., Lipatov O.N.
Introduction. One of the key issues associated with the off-label use of antitumor drugs is safety. Typically, the advantages of such prescriptions in oncology are linked to the potential clinical benefits outweighing the risks of complications.Aim. To assess the safety of the off-label antitumor drug therapy in comparison with the on-label drug administration in the context of real clinical practice among oncologists in the Tula region.Materials and methods. The study was conducted at the Tula Regional Clinical Oncology Center, Russia. Over a six-month period in 2019, clinical data, provided by the regional information system, were analyzed for 919 completed treatment cases of 201 patients over 18 years of age who received antitumor drug therapy for malignant neoplasms. The study enrolled patients who had at least one hospitalization and got off-label antitumor drug therapy, as well as those receiving on-label drug treatment. The study assessed the safety of the off-label antitumor drug therapy in comparison with that of the on-label treatment, estimating the frequency of adverse events (AEs), spectrum of adverse events, severity of adverse events, fatal outcomes, treatment delays and discontinuations, and hospitalizations due to toxicity. A comparative analysis involved the results of using off-label and on-label antitumor drug therapy in terms of the aforementioned parameters. Results and discussion. No unforeseen adverse events were revealed in the study. The spectrum of adverse events encompassed 40 clinical and laboratory abnormalities with varying frequencies across the studied groups. Adverse events were observed in the majority of patients across both studied groups (83% and 86%). A predominance of grade I and II toxicity was noted. In some instances, therapy was discontinued and treatment was suspended; however, the frequency of these occurrences was significantly lower compared to current literature data. One fatal outcome due to complications from the administered therapy was recorded. All adverse events were reported in both studied groups with similar frequencies. The most commonly observed adverse events in both groups included hepatotoxicity, anemia, thrombocytopenia, nephropathy, cephalalgia, leukocytosis, skin toxicity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, bone pain syndrome, and dizziness. Other adverse events occurred sporadically with similar frequency. The most severe presentations were noted in the following adverse events: thrombocytopenia, gastrointestinal toxicity, leukocytosis, hyperglycemia, and immune-mediated diabetes mellitus with ketoacidotic coma.Conclusion. In real clinical practice, the safety of off-label and on-label antitumor drug therapy reveals no significant difference.

Hyponatremia in Neurosurgical Patients
Beylerli О.A.
Hyponatremia refers to a common and potentially dangerous electrolyte imbalance observed in neurosurgical patients, particularly following traumatic brain injuries, subarachnoid hemorrhages, brain tumors, and pituitary surgeries. The paper discusses primary causes and pathophysiology of hyponatremia, including the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone, central adrenal insufficiency, and cerebral salt wasting syndrome. The paper presents differential diagnostic approaches for accurately identifying the underlying causes of hyponatremia, as well as therapeutic strategies that include hypertonic sodium solution infusions, hydrocortisone replacement therapy, and the use of vasopressin receptor antagonists. The study delineates the potential complications associated with overly rapid correction of sodium levels, such as osmotic demyelination syndrome. It emphasizes the importance of accurate diagnosis and timely treatment to enhance patient outcomes and minimize the risk of complications.

Immunotherapy for Malignant Gliomas: Overcoming Barriers and Defining Prospects for Integrated Approaches
Beylerli O.A., Musaev E.R.
In recent years significant advancements have been made in immunotherapy and its application in various types of malignancies. However, standard treatment methods for malignant gliomas, including glioblastoma, have not undergone substantial transformations. The main barriers to the application of immunotherapy in these tumors are associated with the specific characteristics of the tumor microenvironment, immunosuppressive status of the central nervous system, protective function of the blood-brain barrier, and challenges in interpreting neuroimaging data. Additionally, gliomas are characterized by low PD-L1 expression, low mutational burden, and high heterogeneity, which limits the effectiveness of immunotherapy. Nevertheless, clinical studies demonstrate promising results with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, viral therapies, vaccination, and adoptive T-cell therapy. The integration of immunotherapy with radiation therapy to enhance the immune response obtains high potential for managing oncological issues. Further research in this area, including the development of glioblastoma-specific biomarkers and adaptation of immunotherapy to the characteristics of tumor microenvironment will significantly improve the treatment outcomes for malignant gliomas.

Multimodal Approach to Imaging and Staging of Bladder Cancer: Diagnostic Standards and Future Trends
Kagarmanova A.S., Baikov D.E., Itkulov A.F., Khafizov M.M.
The most significant factors influencing the effectiveness of bladder cancer treatment include a tumor subtype, degree of cellular anaplasia, assessment of the invasion depth into the bladder wall, identification of carcinoma in situ, extent of renal function impairment, quality of diagnostic procedures, accurate interpretation of the obtained data, continuity of care among specialists, and the patient’s motivation for treatment. The advent of ultra-high-field magnetic resonance imaging, 640-slice computed tomography, development of new radiopharmaceuticals, and advancements in software technology shape a multimodal approach aimed at identifying optimal diagnostic methods for bladder cancer. The present paper reviews a potential of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for determining the degree of neoplastic invasion into the layers of the bladder wall, a value of computed tomography with intravenous contrast enhancement in diagnosing locally advanced forms of the disease, and capabilities of positron emission tomography as a promising method for non-invasive characterization of tumor physiology with sensitivity in the picomolar range. The paper discusses advantages and disadvantages of the imaging modalities used in the diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma. In addition, the study explores the perfusion computed tomography as an alternative imaging technology for evaluating the layers of the bladder wall to be utilized in cases of absolute contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging.

Implantation Antimicrobial Prophylaxis In General and Military Field Surgery
Plechev V.V., Timerbulatov M.V., Sufiyarov I.F.
Introduction. Surgical site infections of the postoperative period are well recognized as one of the most pressing issues in modern surgery. Surgical site infections significantly complicate the postoperative course, necessitates costly treatment, and may require additional surgical interventions, thereby extending hospital stays and adversely impacting quality of life of the patients. The suture material can facilitate the adhesion of microorganisms to its surface; thus, it is considered as one of the important factors contributing to the development of surgical site infections.Aim. To evaluate and compare the clinical experience of applying the Abaktolat suture material featuring an antimicrobial coating used during surgical interventions.Materials and methods. A retrospective randomized study was conducted involving 49287 patients who were treated across five various medical institutions primarily for abdominal pathologies. The Abaktolat suture material was applied in 25749 patients, of whom 15626 (60.7%) underwent emergency surgeries, while 10123 (39.3%) underwent elective procedures. The second group included 23538 patients who received standard suture material.Results and discussion. The study demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of postoperative infectious complications during emergency surgeries by more than four times (RR 4.23, 95% CI (4.08–4.96), p < 0.0001), and almost by two times during elective surgeries (RR 1.96, 95% CI (1.62–2.37), p < 0.0001) in the group that received Abaktolat, compared to those receiving standard suture materials. In addition, the average length of hospital stay was reduced by 21.6% (2.6 days).Conclusion. Thus, the use of the Abaktolat suture material is a justified method for the prevention of surgical site infections, particularly in emergency surgery settings. This approach significantly reduces the incidence of infectious complications during the postoperative period, enhances the overall quality of recovery, and leads to substantial financial savings in the treatment of surgical patients.

Cicatricial Tracheal Stenosis — A Long-Life Journey
Pechetov A.A., Vishnevskaya G.A., Volchanski D.A., Lednev A.N., Danilov I.I., Gulova N.V.
Introduction. Since ancient times tracheostomy is known as a surgical procedure that ensures airway patency. According to current views, a non-idiopathic cicatricial tracheal stenosis develops within six weeks following the initiation of mechanical ventilation. When a patient presents with a characteristic history and complaints, the diagnosis of cicatricial tracheal stenosis poses no challenges.Aim. To present a series of observations of patients who underwent tracheostomy in childhood, whereas the cicatricial tracheal stenosis was diagnosed only in over 35 years after the onset of airway obstruction symptoms.Materials and methods. The study involved five patients (two men and three women) aged between 43 and 63 years. All patients had undergone tracheostomy in childhood, followed by subsequent decannulation. For over 35 years, the patients were monitored under the diagnosis of bronchial asthma. When a tracheal stenosis was identified, all patients underwent circular tracheal resection.Results and discussion. The duration of the surgical procedure ranged from 110 to 240 minutes. No complications that required re-surgery were recorded. All patients achieved healing of the tracheal anastomosis. The postoperative hospitalization period ranged from 10 to 15 days. The incidence of tracheal complications remains 0.2%–25%. The clinical onset of tracheal stenosis typically occurs within the first few months following decannulation. Functional diagnostic methods reveal a pattern of bronchial obstruction, which necessitates the administration of inhalation therapy using various groups of bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory medications. The most informative instrumental diagnostic techniques for tracheal diseases include laryngotracheoscopy and computed tomography.Conclusion. A history of tracheostomy or mechanical ventilation in patients presenting with complaints of dyspnea requires meticulous attention due to the risk of the development of cicatricial tracheal stenosis.

Effectiveness of Biological and Surgical Sampling for Detection of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis
Islamov R.N., Sharipov R.A., Tukfatullin R.K., Sidorov I.V., Yagafarova R.K.
Introduction. Tuberculosis remains a significant public health issue, ranking second only to COVID-19 in terms of mortality from infectious diseases, with more than 10 million individuals affected annually. Despite a decline in incidence rate, its diagnosis continues to be challenging, particularly in cases with negative results from microbiological and histological examinations.Aim. To compare the effectiveness of surgical diagnostic methods for tuberculosis during the pre-analytical phase of bacteriological verification.Materials and methods. The retrospective study, conducted at the Republican Clinical Tuberculosis Treatment Dispensary of the Republic of Bashkortostan, analyzed data from 1272 patients who were hospitalized in the Tuberculous Pulmonary Surgery Unit from 2021 to 2023 and underwent bacteriological diagnostics, including microscopy and polymerase chain reaction.Results and discussion. The results indicate that out of 1272 surgeries, 65.2% involved resection procedures, with confirmed tuberculosis infection in 83.1% of patients. Bronchoalveolar lavage identified mycobacteria in 153 patients (20.5%), whereas sputum collection revealed them in 106 patients. The new collection method, although less effective, demonstrated a detection rate of 15.7% through molecular genetic analysis.Conclusion. Surgical diagnostic methods for tuberculosis appeared to be effective, detecting mycobacterium tuberculosis in 83.1% of cases, surpassing the standard sputum collection method, which has a detection rate of 10.8% via molecular genetic analysis. Bronchoalveolar lavage proved to be more productive, yielding 20.5% positive results on a molecular genetic basis, 11% microscopically, and 8% through culture. Although the new method is less effective, it is recorded as being more accurate than the standard, with detection rates of 15.7% molecularly, 6.6% microscopically, and 5.2% through culture.

Comparison of Da Vinci XI and Da Vinci SI Surgical Systems in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Papoyan A.O., Urmantsev M.F., Pavlov V.N.
Introduction. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is considered to be the “gold standard” for the radical treatment of prostate cancer, achieving excellent oncological outcomes with a low incidence of complications.Aim. To analyze and compare the efficiency of Da Vinci Xi and Da Vinci Si surgical systems applied in performing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Materials and methods. 165 patients were divided into two groups: Xi-group (n = 77) and Si-group (n = 88). The perioperative characteristics and oncological outcomes were analyzed and compared.Results. The demographic, clinical, and oncological characteristics of the two patient groups appeared similar and comparable. Interventions involving the preservation of the neurovascular bundle, the pelvic fascia, and the puboprostatic ligament were performed using Xi system significantly more often. The surgery duration was significantly shorter in the Xi-group. The postoperative recovery time and the incidence of postoperative complications appeared to be identical across both groups. No differences were revealed in the rates of positive surgical margins or biochemical recurrence.Discussion. Reasons behind the reduced operative time were considered as follows: first, the docking of the Xi system is more user-friendly, resulting in decreased docking time; second, the operational efficiency of the Xi system had been enhanced, thereby leading to reduced workflow times; third, a number of collisions between robotic arms was significantly lower during the procedure, which accelerates the surgical process.Conclusion. A robot-assisted radical prostatectomy performed by an experienced professional, using the Da Vinci Xi or Da Vinci Si surgical systems, appears to be safe and feasible without an increased risk of serious complications. However, the Xi system ensures better perioperative outcomes with comparable oncological results.

Role of TRAP1 Protein in the Development and Progression of Glioblastoma
Gareev I.F., Yasinskaya A.S., Roumiantsev S.A.
Glioblastoma is recognized as the most aggressive type of primary brain tumor. Despite recent advances in understanding the molecular mechanisms involved in the biology of glioblastoma, patient survival rates remain disappointing, primarily due to the lack of effective treatment options. Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated protein 1 (TRAP1), a member of the heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) family, refers to a protein predominantly localized in the mitochondria that regulates both cellular metabolic reprogramming and mitochondrial apoptosis. This protein is highly expressed in several types of tumors, including colorectal cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, and lung cancer, and is often associated with drug resistance. However, TRAP1 is also downregulated in certain cancers such as ovarian cancer, bladder cancer, and renal cancer, where its lower expression correlates with poorer prognoses and chemoresistance. The role of TRAP1 lies in enhancing or suppressing oxidative phosphorylation, with the impact of such regulation on tumor development and progression being a matter of ongoing debate. These observations prompt further investigation into the mechanisms responsible for the dual role of TRAP1 as both an oncogene and a tumor suppressor in specific types of tumors, particularly glioblastoma. The present study reviews the role of TRAP1 in the development and progression of glioblastoma and discusses the potential of targeting TRAP1 as a novel therapeutic approach against tumors.

Clinical Case of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome in a Female Patient Undergoing Surgery for Rectal Cancer
Geraskinа M.M., Galitsynа A.B., Shuvaev V.A., Gosteva S.S.
Introduction. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) refers to a relatively obscure syndrome with unclear pathogenesis, leading to patient disability, occurring in 58% of cases against a background of arterial hypertension. Clinical manifestations include cephalalgia, epileptic seizures, and visual disturbances, potentially culminating in complete blindness. The clinical case represents a rare life-threatening condition that may pose challenges for an attending physician regarding the appropriate therapeutic strategy.Aim. To demonstrate the occurrence of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome during an anterior resection of the rectum, as well as to discuss the correct therapeutic strategy.Materials and methods. A 63-year-old female patient with a history of chronic arterial hypertension was admitted for surgical intervention due to rectal cancer. The operation was performed under general anesthesia and marked by unstable hemodynamics, with blood pressure rising to 160/100 mmHg. After awakening, the patient exhibited loss of vision and coordination disturbances, accompanied by uncontrolled arterial hypertension, with blood pressure rising to 182/130 mmHg. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed areas of hyperintense signal bilaterally in the occipital lobes without signs of diffusion restriction. The neurological deficits were managed through a comprehensive therapeutic regimen, utilizing nootropics, antioxidants, and antihypoxic agents, in conjunction with appropriate antihypertensive treatment. Vision was restored within two weeks.Results and discussion. The management of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome following a hypertensive crisis during surgical intervention should encompass etiological treatment, alongside correction of neurological symptoms utilizing relevant pharmacological agents. An appropriate and timely treatment obtains high potential to resolve the syndrome.Conclusion. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome may develop in patients with a history of arterial hypertension and manifest as a sudden onset of hemodynamic instability during and after surgical intervention, potentially leading to cortical blindness. In such cases, antihypertensive therapy, in conjunction with corrective medications, is advisable.

Safety of the Off-Label Use of Antitumor Drugs in Real Clinical Practice: Experience of Oncologists of the Russian Federation
Каrabina E.V., Sakaeva D.D., Lipatov O.N.
Introduction. One of the key issues associated with the off-label use of antitumor drugs is safety. Typically, the advantages of such prescriptions in oncology are linked to the potential clinical benefits outweighing the risks of complications.Aim. To assess the safety of the off-label antitumor drug therapy in comparison with the on-label drug administration in the context of real clinical practice among oncologists in the Tula region.Materials and methods. The study was conducted at the Tula Regional Clinical Oncology Center, Russia. Over a six-month period in 2019, clinical data, provided by the regional information system, were analyzed for 919 completed treatment cases of 201 patients over 18 years of age who received antitumor drug therapy for malignant neoplasms. The study enrolled patients who had at least one hospitalization and got off-label antitumor drug therapy, as well as those receiving on-label drug treatment. The study assessed the safety of the off-label antitumor drug therapy in comparison with that of the on-label treatment, estimating the frequency of adverse events (AEs), spectrum of adverse events, severity of adverse events, fatal outcomes, treatment delays and discontinuations, and hospitalizations due to toxicity. A comparative analysis involved the results of using off-label and on-label antitumor drug therapy in terms of the aforementioned parameters. Results and discussion. No unforeseen adverse events were revealed in the study. The spectrum of adverse events encompassed 40 clinical and laboratory abnormalities with varying frequencies across the studied groups. Adverse events were observed in the majority of patients across both studied groups (83% and 86%). A predominance of grade I and II toxicity was noted. In some instances, therapy was discontinued and treatment was suspended; however, the frequency of these occurrences was significantly lower compared to current literature data. One fatal outcome due to complications from the administered therapy was recorded. All adverse events were reported in both studied groups with similar frequencies. The most commonly observed adverse events in both groups included hepatotoxicity, anemia, thrombocytopenia, nephropathy, cephalalgia, leukocytosis, skin toxicity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, bone pain syndrome, and dizziness. Other adverse events occurred sporadically with similar frequency. The most severe presentations were noted in the following adverse events: thrombocytopenia, gastrointestinal toxicity, leukocytosis, hyperglycemia, and immune-mediated diabetes mellitus with ketoacidotic coma.Conclusion. In real clinical practice, the safety of off-label and on-label antitumor drug therapy reveals no significant difference.

Genetic Variation and Metabolic Basis of Kidney Cancer: New Opportunities for Targeted Therapy
Urmantsev M.F., Tavabilov R.I., Bakeev M.R.
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has previously been considered as a single disease. However, it is currently characterized as a heterogeneous group of tumors that differ in histological features, genetic abnormalities, and variable clinical course. In normal cells, energy is produced by the cleavage of chemical bonds in nutrients through the oxidation of fats, proteins, or carbohydrates. Mutational alterations in genes associated with RCC, including VHL, FLCN, PTEN and SDH, lead to abnormal cellular adaptation to changes in oxygen status, iron metabolism and nutrients. The present paper reviews the known genetic abnormalities observed in RCC and their impact on metabolic alterations. Understanding the genetic and metabolic mechanisms underlying RCC is crucial for the development of effective therapies. Targeting specific genetic abnormalities or metabolic pathways represents a promising approach to the RCC treatment. In addition, studies into the metabolic basis of RCC contribute to the development of new biomarkers for early diagnosis and monitoring of the disease. Moreover, investigating the role of VHL, FLCN, PTEN, and SDH genes in the development of RCC provides valuable information on the molecular mechanisms behind the disease. As a result, it may lead to the development of new treatment strategies aimed at restoring the normal function of these genes or compensating for their abnormalities. Overall, an integrated approach to the study of RCC that considers genetic, metabolic, and clinical aspects will ensure that more effective treatments are developed and prognosis for patients with this disease are improved.

X-ray Endovascular Embolization for Splenic Artery Aneurysm Complicated by Intestinal Bleeding
Nartaylakov M.A., Shakurov D.F., Loginov M.O., Fayzillin E.S., Borzenkov Е.А., Salimgareev I.Z.
Introduction. Splenic artery aneurysms refer to the most common visceral artery aneurysms. However, they are diagnosed quite rarely, since about 80% of them appear asymptomatic. Clinically, splenic artery aneurysms manifest themselves through their complications, including hemorrhage into pancreatic cysts or intraabdominal bleeding due to their rupture, leading to lethality up to 8.5%. Other complications of splenic artery aneurysms appear extremely rare. The gold standard for the diagnosis of splenic artery aneurysms refers to digital subtraction angiography that enables their exact localization to be determined and aneurysm embolization to be performed. Materials and methods. In the period from 2015 to 2023, we observed 51 patients who underwent endovascular interventions on the splenic artery for hypersplenism (n = 32) and aneurysms (n = 19). In most cases, the aneurysms were asymptomatic. The paper presents a rare clinical case of splenic artery aneurysm complicated by recurrent intestinal bleeding. Results and discussion. Examination (EGD, CS) did not detect the source of recurrent intestinal bleeding. Contrast CT revealed a splenic artery aneurysm. Celiac angiography detected a large aneurysm (52×41 mm) of the splenic artery, closely adjacent to the lower horizontal branch of the duodenum. Endovascular embolization of the splenic artery was performed proximal to the aneurysm, resulting in complete occlusion of blood flow through the splenic artery and aneurysm. No repeated episodes of intestinal bleeding were observed after the intervention, thereby indicating the effectiveness of hemostasis. No signs of splenic ischemization were detected by clinical and examination data due to the preservation of blood flow through short splenic vessels. Conclusion. Endovascular embolization of the splenic artery is found to be an effective treatment for its complicated aneurysms.
Top-100
Citing journals
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
|
|
RSC Advances
2832 citations, 1.46%
|
|
Journal of Alloys and Compounds
1935 citations, 1%
|
|
Applied Surface Science
1817 citations, 0.94%
|
|
Nanomaterials
1778 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry C
1644 citations, 0.85%
|
|
Ceramics International
1631 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Nanotechnology
1548 citations, 0.8%
|
|
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics
1517 citations, 0.78%
|
|
ACS applied materials & interfaces
1428 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Materials
1417 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Scientific Reports
1208 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Nanoscale
1174 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Carbon
1141 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Journal of Materials Chemistry A
1122 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Journal of Applied Physics
1058 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Materials Chemistry and Physics
1017 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Langmuir
967 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Polymers
929 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical
893 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Chemical Engineering Journal
882 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Journal of Nanoparticle Research
869 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Electrochimica Acta
832 citations, 0.43%
|
|
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
815 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Journal of Applied Polymer Science
792 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Materials Research Express
785 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Molecules
783 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Journal of Materials Science
773 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
772 citations, 0.4%
|
|
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
760 citations, 0.39%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
752 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Applied Physics Letters
749 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
749 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Thin Solid Films
721 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Materials Science and Engineering C
720 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
673 citations, 0.35%
|
|
New Journal of Chemistry
661 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
661 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing
658 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
620 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Materials Today: Proceedings
608 citations, 0.31%
|
|
ACS Nano
598 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Advanced Materials
597 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Small
594 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Materials Letters
589 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Materials Research Bulletin
573 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Nanoscale Research Letters
572 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Part 1: Regular Papers & Short Notes
571 citations, 0.29%
|
|
ACS Omega
567 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Nanomaterials
560 citations, 0.29%
|
|
International Journal of Pharmaceutics
548 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Chemical Reviews
537 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Advanced Functional Materials
531 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Optical Materials
530 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Materials Chemistry C
526 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
514 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of the Electrochemical Society
511 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Pharmaceutics
509 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology
493 citations, 0.25%
|
|
ChemistrySelect
492 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Sensors
483 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Physical Review B
479 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Catalysts
475 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing
475 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Nanomedicine
471 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Surface and Coatings Technology
464 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal Physics D: Applied Physics
463 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Carbohydrate Polymers
459 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Electronic Materials
450 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Chemistry of Materials
448 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Luminescence
444 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Materials Chemistry B
438 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Liquids
437 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
428 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Chemosphere
420 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Microporous and Mesoporous Materials
416 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
404 citations, 0.21%
|
|
AIP Conference Proceedings
403 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Polymer
391 citations, 0.2%
|
|
CrystEngComm
389 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Diamond and Related Materials
386 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Coatings
381 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Power Sources
373 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
373 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Dalton Transactions
371 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Controlled Release
365 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
362 citations, 0.19%
|
|
ACS Applied Nano Materials
360 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Physica B: Condensed Matter
358 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Chemical Society Reviews
358 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
355 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Hazardous Materials
355 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Chemical Physics Letters
351 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Inorganic Chemistry Communication
349 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry
346 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Materials Science and Engineering B: Solid-State Materials for Advanced Technology
335 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Chemical Communications
329 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Materials Research
327 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Materials Today Communications
327 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Biomaterials
326 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Advanced Materials Research
315 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
|
Citing publishers
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
|
|
Elsevier
63267 citations, 32.56%
|
|
Springer Nature
24186 citations, 12.45%
|
|
Wiley
16529 citations, 8.51%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
12720 citations, 6.55%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
12476 citations, 6.42%
|
|
MDPI
11983 citations, 6.17%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
7080 citations, 3.64%
|
|
IOP Publishing
5567 citations, 2.87%
|
|
AIP Publishing
3095 citations, 1.59%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
2261 citations, 1.16%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
1828 citations, 0.94%
|
|
SAGE
1349 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
1306 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
1183 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
1116 citations, 0.57%
|
|
World Scientific
845 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
813 citations, 0.42%
|
|
The Electrochemical Society
810 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
794 citations, 0.41%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
678 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Japan Society of Applied Physics
642 citations, 0.33%
|
|
American Scientific Publishers
571 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
515 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
483 citations, 0.25%
|
|
400 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Oxford University Press
398 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
388 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Korean Society of Industrial Engineering Chemistry
371 citations, 0.19%
|
|
American Vacuum Society
347 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
310 citations, 0.16%
|
|
King Saud University
299 citations, 0.15%
|
|
IGI Global
280 citations, 0.14%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
267 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Emerald
252 citations, 0.13%
|
|
237 citations, 0.12%
|
|
IntechOpen
227 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Beilstein-Institut
219 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
202 citations, 0.1%
|
|
The Chemical Society of Japan
199 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
192 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Korean Institute of Metals and Materials
187 citations, 0.1%
|
|
ASME International
187 citations, 0.1%
|
|
177 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
174 citations, 0.09%
|
|
EDP Sciences
154 citations, 0.08%
|
|
The Korean Fiber Society
141 citations, 0.07%
|
|
The Royal Society
137 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
137 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
134 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Polymer Society of Korea
125 citations, 0.06%
|
|
IOS Press
106 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Acta Physica Sinica, Chinese Physical Society and Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
106 citations, 0.05%
|
|
97 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Higher Education Press
92 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Chinese Society of Rare Earths
91 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Japan Institute of Metals
87 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
85 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Thomas Telford
79 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Autonomous Non-profit Organization Editorial Board of the journal Uspekhi Khimii
75 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Ceramic Society of Japan
73 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Annual Reviews
72 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IWA Publishing
70 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Tsinghua University Press
70 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
68 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Asian Journal of Chemistry
66 citations, 0.03%
|
|
61 citations, 0.03%
|
|
60 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
58 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Korean Ceramic Society
58 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
57 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
57 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Science in China Press
55 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
54 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
54 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Hans Publishers
54 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
54 citations, 0.03%
|
|
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)
52 citations, 0.03%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
52 citations, 0.03%
|
|
50 citations, 0.03%
|
|
50 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Wuhan University of Technology
49 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Nonferrous Metals Society of China
48 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Korean Institute of Electrical and Electronic Material Engineers
45 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
45 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry
44 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
44 citations, 0.02%
|
|
International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
42 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Oriental Scientific Publishing Company
42 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
41 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Impact Journals
37 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk Journal
37 citations, 0.02%
|
|
S. Karger AG
37 citations, 0.02%
|
|
SciELO
37 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Scientific Publishers
36 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Begell House
34 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers
34 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
33 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
32 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Pharmaceutical Society of Korea
32 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Surface Science Society of Japan
31 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
|
Publishing organizations
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
|
|
Sungkyunkwan University
403 publications, 1.83%
|
|
Hanyang University
318 publications, 1.44%
|
|
Chonnam National University
270 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Korea University
249 publications, 1.13%
|
|
Seoul National University
248 publications, 1.13%
|
|
Chosun University
239 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Southeast University
224 publications, 1.02%
|
|
Inha University
219 publications, 0.99%
|
|
Chonbuk National University
191 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Kyungpook National University
186 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Pusan National University
186 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Korea Institute of Industrial Technology
163 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Korea Institute of Science and Technology
159 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Gachon University
152 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Hongik University
148 publications, 0.67%
|
|
National Institute for Materials Science
135 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Kyung Hee University
129 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Yonsei University
124 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Nanjing University
122 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Mokpo National University
116 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Sunchon National University
114 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Jilin University
113 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Jiangsu University
111 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Pukyong National University
110 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Sogang University
101 publications, 0.46%
|
|
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
100 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Gyeongsang National University
99 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Chung-Ang University
98 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
97 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Chungnam National University
90 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Peking University
86 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology
85 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Kwangwoon University
83 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Tsinghua University
80 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
80 publications, 0.36%
|
|
National University of Singapore
80 publications, 0.36%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University
79 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
78 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Osaka University
77 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Hunan University of Technology
77 publications, 0.35%
|
|
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
71 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Science and Technology of China
71 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences
69 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Yeungnam University
66 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology
65 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Central South University
64 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science
63 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Pohang University of Science and Technology
63 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Inje University
63 publications, 0.29%
|
|
National Taipei University of Technology
62 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Kongju National University
62 publications, 0.28%
|
|
National Autonomous University of Mexico
62 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Anna University
61 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
61 publications, 0.28%
|
|
National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
61 publications, 0.28%
|
|
China University of Mining and Technology
59 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Lanzhou University
59 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Indian Institute of Science
58 publications, 0.26%
|
|
National Physical Laboratory of India
57 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Sichuan University
56 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Korea National University of Transportation
56 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
56 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Tohoku University
56 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute
55 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute
55 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Technical University of Ostrava
55 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Hanbat National University
52 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Beijing Jiaotong University
51 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Sun Moon University
50 publications, 0.23%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Madras
49 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Hefei University of Technology
49 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
48 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre
48 publications, 0.22%
|
|
National Taiwan University
48 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Samsung
48 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Sejong University
48 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Ewha Womans University
48 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Chungbuk National University
47 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences
47 publications, 0.21%
|
|
University of Texas at Arlington
47 publications, 0.21%
|
|
Ajou University
46 publications, 0.21%
|
|
King Saud University
44 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
44 publications, 0.2%
|
|
National Interuniversity Consortium of Materials Science and Technology
44 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
44 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Kangwon National University
44 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Korea Institute of Energy Research
44 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Najran University
43 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
43 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences
43 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials
42 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Shandong University
42 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Zhejiang University
41 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
41 publications, 0.19%
|
|
University of Science and Technology Beijing
41 publications, 0.19%
|
|
National Tsing Hua University
41 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Myongji University
41 publications, 0.19%
|
|
Dong-A University
40 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Hokkaido University
40 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Harbin Institute of Technology
39 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
|
Sungkyunkwan University
42 publications, 3.02%
|
|
Kyungpook National University
39 publications, 2.81%
|
|
Gachon University
38 publications, 2.73%
|
|
Chosun University
37 publications, 2.66%
|
|
Korea Institute of Industrial Technology
30 publications, 2.16%
|
|
Chonnam National University
29 publications, 2.09%
|
|
China University of Mining and Technology
28 publications, 2.01%
|
|
Mokpo National University
25 publications, 1.8%
|
|
Inha University
22 publications, 1.58%
|
|
Pusan National University
21 publications, 1.51%
|
|
Hongik University
21 publications, 1.51%
|
|
Gyeongsang National University
19 publications, 1.37%
|
|
Chonbuk National University
18 publications, 1.29%
|
|
King Saud University
17 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Sunchon National University
17 publications, 1.22%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
16 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Hanoi University of Science and Technology
15 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Cagliari
15 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Seoul National University of Science and Technology
15 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Changsha University of Science and Technology
15 publications, 1.08%
|
|
Korea University
14 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Kyung Hee University
14 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Pukyong National University
14 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Kongju National University
13 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Sun Moon University
13 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Seoul National University
12 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Henan Polytechnic University
12 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Daegu University
12 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Yeungnam University
11 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Hanbat National University
11 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
11 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology
10 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Jilin University
10 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University
10 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Chung-Ang University
10 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Kwangwoon University
9 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Daegu Catholic University
9 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Sindh
8 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Southeast University
8 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Nanjing University
8 publications, 0.58%
|
|
China University of Geosciences (Beijing)
8 publications, 0.58%
|
|
China University of Petroleum (East China)
8 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Jiangsu University
8 publications, 0.58%
|
|
National Taipei University of Technology
8 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Yonsei University
8 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Chungbuk National University
8 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Inje University
8 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Korea National University of Transportation
8 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Shandong University
8 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Babes-Bolyai University
8 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Peking University
7 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Malaya
7 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Central South University
7 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Linköping University
7 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Chengdu University of Technology
7 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Hallym University
7 publications, 0.5%
|
|
King Khalid University
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Najran University
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Anna University
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Duy Tan University
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Capital Medical University
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Korea Institute of Science and Technology
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Pohang University of Science and Technology
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Ajou University
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Chungnam National University
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Kangwon National University
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Kyonggi University
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Hunan University of Technology
6 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Mehran University of Engineering and Technology
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Nguyen Tat Thanh University
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Chongqing Medical University
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Hefei University of Technology
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Harbin Medical University
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Qingdao University of Science and Technology
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Qingdao University
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
National Interuniversity Consortium of Materials Science and Technology
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Queensland
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Hanyang University
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Korea University of Technology and Education
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Ewha Womans University
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Dankook University
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Szeged
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Kyushu University
5 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Savitribai Phule Pune University
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Madras
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Punjab Agricultural University
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Guilan
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
NED University of Engineering and Technology
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Nanjing Tech University
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Hubei University
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Northeastern University
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
National Institute for Materials Science
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Shanxi Medical University
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Samsung
4 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
Publishing countries
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
|
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 5333, 24.19%
Republic of Korea
5333 publications, 24.19%
|
China
|
China, 5201, 23.59%
China
5201 publications, 23.59%
|
India
|
India, 1482, 6.72%
India
1482 publications, 6.72%
|
USA
|
USA, 1198, 5.43%
USA
1198 publications, 5.43%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 891, 4.04%
Japan
891 publications, 4.04%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 341, 1.55%
Italy
341 publications, 1.55%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 288, 1.31%
Brazil
288 publications, 1.31%
|
France
|
France, 207, 0.94%
France
207 publications, 0.94%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 192, 0.87%
Germany
192 publications, 0.87%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 184, 0.83%
Spain
184 publications, 0.83%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 178, 0.81%
United Kingdom
178 publications, 0.81%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 175, 0.79%
Singapore
175 publications, 0.79%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 159, 0.72%
Australia
159 publications, 0.72%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 145, 0.66%
Mexico
145 publications, 0.66%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 138, 0.63%
Iran
138 publications, 0.63%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 134, 0.61%
Saudi Arabia
134 publications, 0.61%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 133, 0.6%
Thailand
133 publications, 0.6%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 125, 0.57%
Portugal
125 publications, 0.57%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 122, 0.55%
Canada
122 publications, 0.55%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 122, 0.55%
Turkey
122 publications, 0.55%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 111, 0.5%
Vietnam
111 publications, 0.5%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 100, 0.45%
Russia
100 publications, 0.45%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 97, 0.44%
Poland
97 publications, 0.44%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 96, 0.44%
Malaysia
96 publications, 0.44%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 90, 0.41%
Czech Republic
90 publications, 0.41%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 79, 0.36%
South Africa
79 publications, 0.36%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 71, 0.32%
Greece
71 publications, 0.32%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 69, 0.31%
Romania
69 publications, 0.31%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 63, 0.29%
Sweden
63 publications, 0.29%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 54, 0.24%
Hungary
54 publications, 0.24%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 52, 0.24%
Pakistan
52 publications, 0.24%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 36, 0.16%
Belgium
36 publications, 0.16%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 34, 0.15%
Ireland
34 publications, 0.15%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 32, 0.15%
Ukraine
32 publications, 0.15%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 32, 0.15%
Netherlands
32 publications, 0.15%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 31, 0.14%
Switzerland
31 publications, 0.14%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 30, 0.14%
Egypt
30 publications, 0.14%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 30, 0.14%
Finland
30 publications, 0.14%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 28, 0.13%
Israel
28 publications, 0.13%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 27, 0.12%
Austria
27 publications, 0.12%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 27, 0.12%
Chile
27 publications, 0.12%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 24, 0.11%
Iraq
24 publications, 0.11%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 22, 0.1%
Denmark
22 publications, 0.1%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 21, 0.1%
Argentina
21 publications, 0.1%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 20, 0.09%
Colombia
20 publications, 0.09%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 19, 0.09%
UAE
19 publications, 0.09%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 17, 0.08%
Slovakia
17 publications, 0.08%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 13, 0.06%
Serbia
13 publications, 0.06%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 12, 0.05%
Bulgaria
12 publications, 0.05%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 10, 0.05%
New Zealand
10 publications, 0.05%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 10, 0.05%
Norway
10 publications, 0.05%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 10, 0.05%
Slovenia
10 publications, 0.05%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 9, 0.04%
Algeria
9 publications, 0.04%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 9, 0.04%
Lithuania
9 publications, 0.04%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 8, 0.04%
Indonesia
8 publications, 0.04%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 8, 0.04%
Philippines
8 publications, 0.04%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 7, 0.03%
Kazakhstan
7 publications, 0.03%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 7, 0.03%
Bangladesh
7 publications, 0.03%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 7, 0.03%
Tunisia
7 publications, 0.03%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 6, 0.03%
Puerto Rico
6 publications, 0.03%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 5, 0.02%
Latvia
5 publications, 0.02%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 4, 0.02%
Belarus
4 publications, 0.02%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 4, 0.02%
Estonia
4 publications, 0.02%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 4, 0.02%
Croatia
4 publications, 0.02%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 3, 0.01%
Botswana
3 publications, 0.01%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 3, 0.01%
Morocco
3 publications, 0.01%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 3, 0.01%
Tanzania
3 publications, 0.01%
|
Montenegro
|
Montenegro, 3, 0.01%
Montenegro
3 publications, 0.01%
|
Azerbaijan
|
Azerbaijan, 2, 0.01%
Azerbaijan
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 2, 0.01%
Armenia
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 2, 0.01%
Brunei
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 2, 0.01%
Venezuela
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 2, 0.01%
Qatar
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 2, 0.01%
Cyprus
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 2, 0.01%
Costa Rica
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 2, 0.01%
Cuba
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 2, 0.01%
Lebanon
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 2, 0.01%
Luxembourg
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 2, 0.01%
Mongolia
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 2, 0.01%
Nepal
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 2, 0.01%
Oman
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 2, 0.01%
Ethiopia
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Barbados
|
Barbados, 1, 0%
Barbados
1 publication, 0%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 1, 0%
Bahrain
1 publication, 0%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0%
Jordan
1 publication, 0%
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
Côte d'Ivoire, 1, 0%
Côte d'Ivoire
1 publication, 0%
|
Laos
|
Laos, 1, 0%
Laos
1 publication, 0%
|
Uzbekistan
|
Uzbekistan, 1, 0%
Uzbekistan
1 publication, 0%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 1, 0%
Ecuador
1 publication, 0%
|
Show all (60 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 527, 37.91%
Republic of Korea
527 publications, 37.91%
|
China
|
China, 471, 33.88%
China
471 publications, 33.88%
|
India
|
India, 114, 8.2%
India
114 publications, 8.2%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 37, 2.66%
Vietnam
37 publications, 2.66%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 29, 2.09%
Italy
29 publications, 2.09%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 28, 2.01%
Japan
28 publications, 2.01%
|
USA
|
USA, 25, 1.8%
USA
25 publications, 1.8%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 25, 1.8%
Saudi Arabia
25 publications, 1.8%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 20, 1.44%
Brazil
20 publications, 1.44%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 15, 1.08%
Australia
15 publications, 1.08%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 14, 1.01%
Pakistan
14 publications, 1.01%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 14, 1.01%
Romania
14 publications, 1.01%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 13, 0.94%
Malaysia
13 publications, 0.94%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 11, 0.79%
Iran
11 publications, 0.79%
|
France
|
France, 10, 0.72%
France
10 publications, 0.72%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 9, 0.65%
Turkey
9 publications, 0.65%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 7, 0.5%
Spain
7 publications, 0.5%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 7, 0.5%
Sweden
7 publications, 0.5%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 5, 0.36%
Hungary
5 publications, 0.36%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 5, 0.36%
Mexico
5 publications, 0.36%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 4, 0.29%
United Kingdom
4 publications, 0.29%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 4, 0.29%
Singapore
4 publications, 0.29%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 4, 0.29%
Thailand
4 publications, 0.29%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 3, 0.22%
Germany
3 publications, 0.22%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 3, 0.22%
Indonesia
3 publications, 0.22%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 3, 0.22%
Canada
3 publications, 0.22%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 3, 0.22%
UAE
3 publications, 0.22%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 2, 0.14%
Kazakhstan
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 2, 0.14%
Ukraine
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 2, 0.14%
Portugal
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 2, 0.14%
Austria
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 2, 0.14%
Egypt
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 0.14%
Ireland
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 2, 0.14%
Lithuania
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 2, 0.14%
Mongolia
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 2, 0.14%
Netherlands
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 2, 0.14%
Serbia
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 2, 0.14%
Slovenia
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 2, 0.14%
Switzerland
2 publications, 0.14%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 2, 0.14%
South Africa
2 publications, 0.14%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.07%
Russia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.07%
Estonia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.07%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.07%
Belgium
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.07%
Greece
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.07%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.07%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
Côte d'Ivoire, 1, 0.07%
Côte d'Ivoire
1 publication, 0.07%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 1, 0.07%
New Zealand
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 0.07%
Oman
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.07%
Poland
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.07%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 1, 0.07%
Czech Republic
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 1, 0.07%
Chile
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 1, 0.07%
Ethiopia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Show all (25 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
5 profile journal articles
Soon Young
114 publications,
4 439 citations
h-index: 35
4 profile journal articles
Eric Xu H
PhD

Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences
702 publications,
19 346 citations
h-index: 68
3 profile journal articles
Nasibulin Albert
🥼 🤝
DSc in Chemistry, Professor

Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology
444 publications,
12 687 citations
h-index: 59
Research interests
Film
Green technologies
Nanophotonics
Physical and chemical materials science
3 profile journal articles
Boldeiu Adina
🤝
National Institute for Research and Development in Microtechnologies
73 publications,
450 citations
h-index: 12
3 profile journal articles
Castellino Micaela

Polytechnic University of Turin
122 publications,
3 084 citations
h-index: 31
3 profile journal articles
Niedzielski Piotr
63 publications,
820 citations
h-index: 17
2 profile journal articles
Gozin Michael
🥼
122 publications,
4 957 citations
h-index: 38
2 profile journal articles
Obraztsova Elena

Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology

Prokhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
326 publications,
7 148 citations
h-index: 39
2 profile journal articles
Sengupta Joydip
🥼 🤝
University of Calcutta
59 publications,
883 citations
h-index: 16
2 profile journal articles
Karapetrov Goran

Drexel University
143 publications,
3 886 citations
h-index: 30
2 profile journal articles
Duan Jiahua

Beijing Institute of Technology
45 publications,
1 638 citations
h-index: 19
2 profile journal articles
Adhikari Rameshwar
176 publications,
2 809 citations
h-index: 28
2 profile journal articles
Munoz-Sandoval Emilio
115 publications,
4 149 citations
h-index: 27
2 profile journal articles
Marasamy Latha
🤝 🥼
PhD
50 publications,
576 citations
h-index: 15