Open Access
Communications Earth & Environment
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
8.1
SJR
2.835
CiteScore
8.6
Categories
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
Areas
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Environmental Science
Years of issue
2020-2025
journal names
Communications Earth & Environment
COMMUN EARTH ENVIRON
Top-3 citing journals

Science of the Total Environment
(748 citations)

Communications Earth & Environment
(683 citations)

Geophysical Research Letters
(664 citations)
Top-3 organizations

ETH Zurich
(87 publications)

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
(63 publications)

Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
(61 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 1847
Q1

Prediction of airport surface potential conflict based on GNN‐LSTM
Yuan L., Fang D., Chen H., Liu J.
AbstractThe development of the civil aviation industry has contributed to a steady increase in the number of daily flight operations at airports, which in turn has led to increasingly complex airport ground layouts. To aid airport managers in understanding the operational situation on the airport surface, this paper introduces a predictive model for airport ground conflict situations based on GNN‐LSTM. This model identifies potential conflicts, conflict hotspots, and conflict hotspots zones, designating key intersections on taxiways as conflict hotspots according to taxiing rules. A conflict network is constructed, employing GNN with an integrated attention mechanism to extract structural features of the network, while LSTM is utilized to capture temporal features. After tuning the model parameters, predictions are made regarding the overall potential number of potential conflicts on the surface. To validate the effectiveness of the model, experimental analysis is conducted using AirTOp simulation data from Shenzhen Bao'an Airport, comparing GNN‐LSTM model with GNN‐GRU, LSTM, and GRU models, using RMSE and MAE as loss functions. The results demonstrate that he proposed modelling approach effectively extracts the temporal features of potential conflict and GNN‐LSTM model outperforms other models in predicting the overall number of potential conflicts.
Q1

Boarding stop inference with uncertain relationship between bus vehicles and mobile smart card readers
Zhou P., Shen Y., Ji Y., Du Y.
AbstractBoarding stop inference for bus passengers is essential for the improvement of bus transit services. Previous studies mainly focus on matching the bus trajectories with the bus stop locations, while the relationship between smart card readers—which collect the smart card data—and bus vehicles is usually given. However, uncertainties arise in practical applications regarding the matching of vehicles and card readers. To tackle this challenge, in this study, a data‐driven approach is proposed to dig into the spatiotemporal features of passengers' smart card data and bus vehicle operations. A weighted bipartite graph algorithm is developed to match the smart card readers with the bus vehicles automatically. To verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed approach, a case study is conducted on the Bus Anhong Line in Shanghai, China. The inferred results of boarding stops are compared with the data from passenger counting sensors installed in the bus vehicles. The matching accuracy rate achieves 0.9539, which validates the effectiveness of the proposed matching model. In addition, the inferred data are used to present the spatiotemporal patterns of boarding passengers and identify high‐demand bus stops.
Q1

Design prognostics for 4400 TEU container vessel by multi‐variate Gaidai reliability approach
Zhu Y., Gaidai O., Sheng J., Ashraf A., Cao Y., Liu Z.
AbstractThis case study introduces an innovative multivariate methodology for assessing the lifetime of marine engineering systems, specifically in cargo vessel transportation. The analysis focused on stress data collected onboard a 4400 TEU container vessel during multiple trans‐Atlantic voyages. One of the major challenges in marine cargo transport lies in mitigating the risk of container loss due to excessive whipping loads. Accurate prediction of extreme stress levels on vessel deck panels remains difficult, primarily because of the nonlinear and non‐stationary nature of wave and ship motion interactions. Higher‐order dynamic effects, such as second‐ and third‐order responses, often become significant when ships operate under adverse environmental conditions, amplifying nonlinear influences. Laboratory simulations, constrained by wave characteristics and scale similarity issues, may not always provide reliable results. Consequently, data collected from vessels navigating extreme weather conditions serves as a critical resource for comprehensive container ship risk assessment. The primary goal of this study was to validate and demonstrate the effectiveness of a novel multivariate risk evaluation approach, leveraging onboard measurements of dynamic areal pressure on cargo ship deck panels as the core dataset. The Gaidai methodology for multivariate risk evaluation proved to be a robust tool for assessing failure, hazard, and damage risks in complex, nonlinear vessel deck panel and ship hull stress systems.
Q1

A reinforcement learning‐based reverse‐parking system for autonomous vehicles
Al‐Mousa A., Arrabi A., Daoud H.
AbstractThis work presents the design and implementation of a reinforcement learning‐based autonomous parking system where an agent is trained to reverse‐park in a selected parking spot. The parking procedure is divided into three stages, and each stage has its corresponding surrogate objective that contributes to the overall parking process. The model solely depends on features extracted from a top‐view image of the parking space. It has the advantage of potential deployment in smart parking buildings without refitting non‐autonomous cars with modern sensors. The training was conducted offline on a simulation utilizing the proximal policy optimization algorithm. The model was then transferred and tested on a hardware prototype of the parking space. The results of the system were successful as the successful parking rate reached 100% with no collisions with any objects, and the fastest parking time reached 10 s. The testing was conducted on multiple samples and scenarios of the parking setup.
Q1

Edge‐computing‐based operations for automated vehicles with different cooperation classes at stop‐controlled intersections
Soleimaniamiri S., Yao H., Ghiasi A., Li X., Bujanović P., Vadakpat G., Lochrane T.W.
AbstractCooperation classes have been defined by SAE International to differentiate the communication capabilities between vehicles and infrastructure. To advance understanding of the impact of cooperation classes on autonomous cooperative driving and optimize traffic operations, this article proposes an edge‐computing‐based operations framework for cooperative‐automated driving system (C‐ADS)‐equipped vehicles at a stop‐controlled intersection. First, a critical time points estimation component estimates a set of critical time points for each C‐ADS‐equipped vehicle. Second, a trajectory‐smoothing component is called at each C‐ADS‐equipped vehicle in a decentralized manner to control C‐ADS‐equipped vehicle trajectories based on the estimated critical time points and its cooperation behavior. Notably, this study represents a first‐time investigation of different cooperation classes for stop‐controlled intersections. Simulation results show that the proposed framework can reduce stop‐and‐go traffic, yielding significant improvements in mobility and energy efficiency, as the cooperation class increases. Results also demonstrate that the proposed framework is suitable for real‐time applications by distributing computational burden in different entities. Further, results verify that the proposed framework can handle varying speed errors without significant loss in performance.
Q1

Formulation and solution framework for real‐time railway traffic management with demand prediction
Pascariu B., Flensburg J.V., Pellegrini P., Azevedo C.M.
AbstractRecent transport policies increasingly promote shifts towards rail travel aiming at a more sustainable transportation system. This shift is hampered by widespread unexpected perturbations in operations, resulting in perceived poor punctuality and reliability. When prevention of such perturbations is not feasible, traffic management must mitigate their effects, resolving arising conflicts to restore regular train operations and minimize delay. Current practice generally includes the assessment of railway performance in terms of train delays, but the quality of service to passengers is rarely explicitly accounted for. A railway traffic management framework is proposed that accounts for both passenger and train delays. To do so, a predictive optimization framework is proposed, integrating a demand prediction module, a passenger demand assignment module and a traffic management module. The first dynamically predicts future origin‐destination passenger flows using linear regression on real‐time observed smart card data. Then, the demand assignment module links predicted passengers to specific train paths, given a railway schedule. Finally, the traffic management module optimizes train scheduling and routing in real time, under the combined objective of minimizing train and passenger delays. The methodology is validated and benchmarked against equivalent passenger agnostic traffic management on a case study of the Copenhagen suburban railway network. The results show that it is possible to take into account passenger perspective in railway traffic management, without reducing the railway system efficiency compared to classic approaches.
Q1

Hybrid spatial and channel attention in post‐accident object detection
Kim J., Lee S.
AbstractAnalysing post‐accident scenes using in‐vehicle cameras is crucial for effective highway traffic control and enhancing accident response, road safety, and traffic flow. This contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the situation and achieves better decision‐making and effective management. The accident scene report system is designed to focus on specific post‐accident objects, such as crashed vehicles, involved individuals, emergency vehicles, and debris. This means that the post‐accident object detection algorithm needs to handle a wide variety of objects, from large collapsed vehicles to tiny particles. It should operate in real‐time on embedded boards, balancing detection accuracy and compactness to fit within the constraints of embedded computing modules. This approach aims to facilitate prompt reporting to traffic control centres. In this study, a hybrid spatial and channel attention and its pruning algorithm tailored for object detection in post‐accident scenarios are proposed. This approach markedly enhances the detection performance in the unexpected accidents and malfunctioning scenes, significantly boosting the system's accuracy and processing speed. The method optimally balances the model compactness with seamless attention and pruning, making it highly suitable for real‐time applications in traffic monitoring systems. The proposed seamless attention and pruning method is demonstrated using the proposed accident object detection dataset.
Q1

Lane‐changing control strategy for distributed drive vehicles considering yaw stability
Hu J., Liu H., Yi S., Huang C.
AbstractIntelligent vehicles are prone to dangerous issues such as sideslip and instability when changing lanes to avoid obstacles under some extreme conditions. Therefore, to improve safety and stability during the obstacle‐avoidance process, this paper proposes a lane‐change control method that considers yaw stability based on distributed drive electric vehicles. Fuzzy adaptive model predictive control and proportional integral derivative (PID) control are, respectively, established to compute the optimal front wheel steering angle and vehicle longitudinal torque under lateral and longitudinal decoupling. Additionally, a direct yaw moment controller is constructed based on model predictive control to calculate the additional yaw moment, which is then distributed according to the tire adhesion utilisation rate to optimise yaw stability in lane‐changing obstacle‐avoidance scenarios. Finally, the proposed control framework is verified in typical obstacle‐avoidance scenarios. The results show that, compared to the control method that do not consider yaw stability, the average yaw rate deviation is reduced by 54.0% on high‐adhesion road surfaces and by 61.2% on low‐adhesion road surfaces, achieving further optimsation in the safety and stability of the obstacle‐avoidance process.
Q1

A two‐layer control strategy for fuel‐efficient connected vehicles
Bentaleb A., Hajjaji A.E., Karama A., Rabhi A., Benzaouia A.
AbstractThis paper proposes a two‐layer control strategy to enhance connected vehicles fuel efficiency. Compared with previous works, this study proposes an approach to optimize both the vehicle speed and gearbox position to achieve better fuel efficiency. The control task is given in two stages: the upper layer and the lower layer. Before trip departure, the upper layer concurrently optimizes the vehicle speed and gearbox position based on road map information, and engine and vehicle parameters for an entire route. Then, while driving, the lower layer is used to follow the pre‐computed optimal profiles. Model predictive control follows the optimal speed while ensuring an adaptive safe distance constraint with a preceding vehicle. For gear shifting, an online shift control assuring the tracking of the optimal gear position is developed based on look‐ahead road data and vehicle actions. The effectiveness of the proposed control strategy was evaluated with comprehensive simulations and comparison tests using Matlab and CarSim software. The mean online optimization calculation time is 0.065 s, indicating its real‐time capability. The proposed method can be used as a driving assist system or implemented as a speed and gear controller for self‐driving vehicles.
Q1

An activity scheduling and multi‐agent micro‐simulation platform (ASMMSP) based on long‐term cellular data and considering multi‐mode transfer
Zhou J., Yang F., Guo Y., Wang L., Yao Z.
AbstractWith the growth of urban residential density, cities have developed into metropolitan, resulting in increasingly complex individual travel behaviours. These developments pose challenges to current simulation models in activity scheduling. This paper proposed an activity scheduling and multi‐agent micro‐simulation platform (ASMMSP). By incorporating long‐term cellular data, the platform can eliminate the reliance on personal attributes in activity scheduling, which improves the simulation flexibility and accuracy. ASMMSP also focuses on transfer behaviours between different travel modes. The platform comprises three systems: agent, public transportation, and road network. At each moment, agents evaluate their current states and activity schedules, then change schedules based on the comparison results, current travel conditions, and historical travels. ASMMSP reconstructs the traffic condition within the research area by integrating the current traffic flow and activity schedules iteratively. Furthermore, ASMMSP allows for observation of real‐time traffic conditions. It also enables adjustments to public transportation, road network structure, and traffic volume, which can simulate the traffic impact from emergencies, gatherings, road maintenance, and public transportation adjustments. These functions support traffic models applied in traffic planning, development, and construction. Finally, this paper demonstrates the above capabilities through two case studies in the first ring road of Chengdu.
Q1

Implications of as‐built highway horizontal curves on vehicle dynamics/kinematics characteristics under adaptive cruise control
Wang S., Lai Y., Qiu X., Ma Y., Easa S.M., Zheng Y.
AbstractDue to road curvature and sensors’ limited field of view, as‐built highway curves would pose an operational challenge to the adaptive cruise control (ACC) system and its shared control. However, very few studies explored the adaptability of ACC system‐dedicated vehicles (V‐ACC) considering the vehicle‐road geometry interaction. Therefore, the objectives of this study are twofold: (i) investigating the implications of horizontal curves on V‐ACC dynamics and kinematics characteristics; and (ii) evaluating V‐ACC's adaptability from the safety, comfort, and speed consistency (S‐C‐S) aspects. To this end, a PreScan/CarSim/MATLAB/Simulink co‐simulation platform is established and it is validated by OpenACC database followed by designing many tests featuring circular curve radius (RC), desired speed (Vde), and clearance. The impact mechanism of geometric features was analysed by interpreting dynamics and kinematics characteristics along curves and critical features were further extracted by reference to S‐C‐S thresholds. The results show that: (i) either smaller RC or higher Vde causes those characteristics toward their S‐C‐S margins; (ii) neither sideslip nor rollover occurs, and speed consistency is good in most RC conditions; and (iii) drivers can follow the leading car comfortably with Vde = 40, 80–100 km/h but feel uncomfortable when Vde = 50–70 km/h and RC approaches its lower bounds.
Q1

A lightweight social cognitive risk potential field model for path planning with dedicated dynamic and static traffic factors
Guo S., Zheng S., Li J., Zhou Q., Xu H.
AbstractDriving risk assessment is crucial for autonomous vehicles to guarantee driving safety and traffic efficiency. Risk field models with insufficient consideration of traffic factors are not reliable enough to provide effective support for automated driving tasks, and those highly complex models with numerous uncertain coefficients also limit the execution of automated driving tasks. Inspired by Coulomb's law, this paper proposes a new lightweight social cognitive driving risk potential field model by leveraging interaction forces between charges to explore the effects of dynamic and static traffic factors on driving risks. Through complexity analysis, the number of coefficients in the proposed model was reduced by 36%–50% compared to other models. With parametric analysis and sensitivity analysis, the model's reliability was demonstrated. A path planner was designed by integrating the proposed driving risk field model into a model predictive controller for validating the efficacy of the proposed risk potential field model. The planned path with the proposed risk field model was also compared with existing risk potential field models. Results indicate that the proposed model can effectively account for both dynamic and static traffic factors, thereby supporting the path planner to generate highly adaptable paths for complex traffic scenarios.
Q1

Identifying abnormal driving states of drunk drivers using UAV
Zhou G., Xu K., Chen J., Mao L.
AbstractThe rising number of car owners has increased the frequency of drunk driving‐related traffic accidents, which is a significant danger to traffic safety. Many drawbacks of traditional drunk driving detection techniques include missed detection, interference with regular drivers, inadequate real‐time monitoring, and excessive labour costs. In this work, the intent is to increase the accuracy, real‐time performance, and coverage of drunk driving detection by proposing a method for differentiating abnormal driving conditions while intoxicated by utilizing unmanned aerial vehicle technology. The approach uses an unmanned aerial vehicle to identify the driver's facial expression to determine whether there is an evidence of drunk driving behaviour is drunk driving behaviour. It then uses these models to score vehicle trajectory anomalies, including vehicle sway, vehicle sudden speed change, and signalized intersection waiting time. According to the trial data, the system can successfully identify drunk drivers, and its accuracy has increased by 10.8% compared to the high accuracy and real‐time performance of traditional drunk driving detection methods.
Q1

Train operation simulation and capacity analysis for a high‐speed maglev station
Deng L., Zhang Y., Jing E., Li Y., Li H.
AbstractFocusing on the transportation organization characteristics of the high‐speed maglev station, this article simulates the train operation process based on the train running calculation and the train operation scheme for multi‐type trains, and analyzes the station capacity based on the simulation for multi‐type trains and typical‐layout stations. This study is carried out from the following three perspectives: (i) calculating train running in the train operation process, (ii) calculating the carrying capacity for single‐type trains, and (iii) simulating the train operation scheme at the station. By analyzing the running process and working conditions of a high‐speed maglev train during various operations, a kinematic model for the train running and a simulation method for the technical operation process based on the operation calculation are established. The simulation results for train running calculation are then used to determine the time required and the capacity for the station handing single‐type trains, which is the basis of analyzing multi‐type trains operations. In the simulation for operations of multi‐type trains, three simulation strategies are designed: track selection strategy, route segment lock/unlock strategy, and operation method choosing strategy. The operational process of a high‐speed maglev station under multi‐train and multi‐technology conditions is simulated based on the above strategies, and the capacity utilization of the station is calculated. The capacity utilization characteristics of typical‐layout stations and the recommended layouts for stations under different scenarios are given for capacity analysis and optimization.
Q1

A study on identifying representative trips for mobility service design
Kim J., Tak S., Yoon J., Yeo H.
AbstractRecently, with growing interest in urban mobility patterns, the demand for collecting and analysing origin‐destination (OD) data is increasing. Due to the large scale and dimensionality of OD data, there are two issues in analysing the data: big‐data storage and major pattern extraction. To deal with two issues at the same time, this study suggests a principal control analysis‐based major demand identification method to improve the usability of microscopic OD data. Especially, this study focuses on finding principal components that preserve major patterns from OD data with small random noise so that the data can be effectively used for mobility service design. The proposed method is applied to smart card data of Seoul and Sejong and extracted major demand patterns from peak‐ and non‐peak hour data of these cities. The degree of daily regularity, reconstruction accuracy, and compression rate of the reconstructed data is analysed varying sets of principal components. The obtained results show that the major demands contain a low volume and a large volume of demand and with lower‐order principal components, major demands can be efficiently extracted by removing randomly appearing small‐volume demand. In addition, the trade‐off behaviour is observed between the degree of daily regularity and reconstruction accuracy depending on the compression rate. Based on the observations, it can be found that the loss of major demand patterns could be prevented when targeting a reconstruction accuracy of 90–95% and the proposed method can reduce the data size while preserving major mobility patterns.
Top-100
Citing journals
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
|
|
Science of the Total Environment
748 citations, 2.96%
|
|
Communications Earth & Environment
683 citations, 2.7%
|
|
Geophysical Research Letters
664 citations, 2.63%
|
|
Nature Communications
406 citations, 1.61%
|
|
Environmental Research Letters
381 citations, 1.51%
|
|
Scientific Reports
375 citations, 1.49%
|
|
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
316 citations, 1.25%
|
|
Remote Sensing
303 citations, 1.2%
|
|
Frontiers in Marine Science
276 citations, 1.09%
|
|
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
261 citations, 1.03%
|
|
Journal of Hydrology
231 citations, 0.91%
|
|
Cryosphere
207 citations, 0.82%
|
|
Environmental Science & Technology
198 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Quaternary Science Reviews
187 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Management
184 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
179 citations, 0.71%
|
|
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science
179 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Sustainability
175 citations, 0.69%
|
|
Earth's Future
164 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Climate Dynamics
151 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Frontiers in Earth Science
139 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Atmosphere
136 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Global Change Biology
134 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
127 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Ecological Indicators
124 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Global and Planetary Change
123 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Earth-Science Reviews
120 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Science advances
119 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
118 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Nature Climate Change
115 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Water (Switzerland)
109 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology
106 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Biogeosciences
105 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
104 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Land
104 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
103 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Chemical Geology
102 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Atmospheric Research
99 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Forests
97 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Earth System Science Data
97 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Journal of Hazardous Materials
96 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Journal of Climate
94 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Nature
93 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
92 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Climate of the Past
91 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Marine Pollution Bulletin
87 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
81 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Geophysical Journal International
81 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Catena
80 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
80 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
79 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Water Resources Research
78 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Environmental Pollution
77 citations, 0.3%
|
|
International Journal of Climatology
74 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
72 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Science
71 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research
70 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Nature Geoscience
70 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Geoscientific Model Development
68 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Seismological Research Letters
68 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Water Research
68 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
64 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Scientific data
64 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Progress in Oceanography
64 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
60 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Frontiers in Climate
60 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
59 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Frontiers in Environmental Science
59 citations, 0.23%
|
|
One Earth
59 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Agronomy
58 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Minerals
58 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Lithos
56 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
55 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Energies
55 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Environmental Research
54 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Earth System Dynamics
53 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Ocean Science
53 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Geoderma
52 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
51 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Applied Soil Ecology
49 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Tectonophysics
49 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Weather and Climate Extremes
49 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Forest Ecology and Management
49 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology
47 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Geomorphology
47 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
46 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Bulletin of Volcanology
46 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Remote Sensing of Environment
46 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
46 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Glaciology
45 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Atmospheric Environment
45 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface
45 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Marine Environmental Research
44 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
44 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
44 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Chemosphere
44 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Marine Geology
43 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Sustainable Cities and Society
43 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
43 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Applied Energy
43 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
|
Citing publishers
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
|
|
Elsevier
7747 citations, 30.68%
|
|
Springer Nature
4591 citations, 18.18%
|
|
Wiley
2126 citations, 8.42%
|
|
MDPI
1972 citations, 7.81%
|
|
American Geophysical Union
1355 citations, 5.37%
|
|
Copernicus
1323 citations, 5.24%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
892 citations, 3.53%
|
|
IOP Publishing
578 citations, 2.29%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
490 citations, 1.94%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
429 citations, 1.7%
|
|
Oxford University Press
313 citations, 1.24%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
235 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
209 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
208 citations, 0.82%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
187 citations, 0.74%
|
|
American Meteorological Society
185 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
128 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
123 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
123 citations, 0.49%
|
|
SAGE
107 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
99 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Seismological Society of America (SSA)
94 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Science in China Press
67 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
66 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Geological Society of London
66 citations, 0.26%
|
|
The Royal Society
65 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Annual Reviews
48 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
45 citations, 0.18%
|
|
EDP Sciences
42 citations, 0.17%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
42 citations, 0.17%
|
|
AIP Publishing
39 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Geological Society of America
38 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Inter-Research Science Center
32 citations, 0.13%
|
|
American Astronomical Society
31 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
28 citations, 0.11%
|
|
IGI Global
26 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IntechOpen
26 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
23 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IWA Publishing
23 citations, 0.09%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
23 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
22 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Emerald
21 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
19 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
16 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
14 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
13 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Mineralogical Society of America
13 citations, 0.05%
|
|
SciELO
13 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
12 citations, 0.05%
|
|
University of Colorado
12 citations, 0.05%
|
|
National Association of Geoscience Teachers, Inc.
12 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
11 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
11 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Society of Petroleum Engineers
11 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Physiological Society
10 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
10 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Society of Economic Geologists
10 citations, 0.04%
|
|
F1000 Research
10 citations, 0.04%
|
|
University of California Press
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
PeerJ
9 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
BMJ
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Society for Sedimentary Geology (SEPM)
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
8 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Australian Bureau of Meteorology
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japan Association of Mineralogical Sciences
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Scientific Societies
6 citations, 0.02%
|
|
World Scientific
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
OAE Publishing Inc.
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
GeoScienceWorld
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Meteorological Society of Japan
5 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Magnolia Press
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
International Association for Great Lakes Research
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institute of Research and Community Services Diponegoro University (LPPM UNDIP)
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Moscow University Press
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
King Saud University
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Japan Society of High Pressure Science and Technology
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Journal of Science
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Korean Society of Economic and Environmental Geology
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
ASME International
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
CAIRN
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Oceanographic Society of Japan
3 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Academia Sinica
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
IOS Press
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Liverpool University Press
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Microbiology Society
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
South African Assn. For The Advancement Of Science
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Geophysical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|
|
ETH Zurich
87 publications, 4%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
63 publications, 2.9%
|
|
Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
61 publications, 2.8%
|
|
Utrecht University
57 publications, 2.62%
|
|
Columbia University
50 publications, 2.3%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
50 publications, 2.3%
|
|
Peking University
45 publications, 2.07%
|
|
University of Tokyo
45 publications, 2.07%
|
|
Sorbonne University
44 publications, 2.02%
|
|
University of Bremen
44 publications, 2.02%
|
|
California Institute of Technology
43 publications, 1.98%
|
|
National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology
43 publications, 1.98%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
42 publications, 1.93%
|
|
Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology
40 publications, 1.84%
|
|
University of Oxford
38 publications, 1.75%
|
|
University of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines
38 publications, 1.75%
|
|
Helmholtz Centre Potsdam - GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences
37 publications, 1.7%
|
|
Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
36 publications, 1.66%
|
|
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
36 publications, 1.66%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
36 publications, 1.66%
|
|
University of New South Wales
35 publications, 1.61%
|
|
University of Cambridge
35 publications, 1.61%
|
|
University of Exeter
35 publications, 1.61%
|
|
Aarhus University
34 publications, 1.56%
|
|
University of Leeds
34 publications, 1.56%
|
|
Institut Pierre Simon Laplace
34 publications, 1.56%
|
|
Tsinghua University
33 publications, 1.52%
|
|
Nanjing University
33 publications, 1.52%
|
|
University College London
33 publications, 1.52%
|
|
University of Washington
33 publications, 1.52%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
33 publications, 1.52%
|
|
University of Southampton
32 publications, 1.47%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
31 publications, 1.43%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
31 publications, 1.43%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
30 publications, 1.38%
|
|
Imperial College London
30 publications, 1.38%
|
|
University of Bergen
30 publications, 1.38%
|
|
University of Queensland
30 publications, 1.38%
|
|
Stanford University
30 publications, 1.38%
|
|
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
29 publications, 1.33%
|
|
Australian National University
28 publications, 1.29%
|
|
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
28 publications, 1.29%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
28 publications, 1.29%
|
|
National Oceanography Centre
28 publications, 1.29%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
27 publications, 1.24%
|
|
Stockholm University
26 publications, 1.2%
|
|
University of Oslo
26 publications, 1.2%
|
|
University of Tasmania
26 publications, 1.2%
|
|
National Center for Atmospheric Research
26 publications, 1.2%
|
|
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
25 publications, 1.15%
|
|
University of Potsdam
25 publications, 1.15%
|
|
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
25 publications, 1.15%
|
|
Texas A&M University
25 publications, 1.15%
|
|
University of Zurich
24 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Arizona
24 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Beijing Normal University
23 publications, 1.06%
|
|
Hamburg University
23 publications, 1.06%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
23 publications, 1.06%
|
|
Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
22 publications, 1.01%
|
|
National Taiwan University
22 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research
22 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Oregon State University
22 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
22 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Goddard Space Flight Center
22 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
22 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences
22 publications, 1.01%
|
|
University of Bern
21 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
21 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
21 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Princeton University
21 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
21 publications, 0.97%
|
|
University of Minnesota
21 publications, 0.97%
|
|
University of Innsbruck
21 publications, 0.97%
|
|
University of Reading
21 publications, 0.97%
|
|
University of São Paulo
21 publications, 0.97%
|
|
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
20 publications, 0.92%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
20 publications, 0.92%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
20 publications, 0.92%
|
|
Southern University of Science and Technology
20 publications, 0.92%
|
|
University of Manchester
20 publications, 0.92%
|
|
University of Melbourne
20 publications, 0.92%
|
|
Ohio State University
20 publications, 0.92%
|
|
University of California, Davis
20 publications, 0.92%
|
|
Lund University
19 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
19 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Arizona State University
19 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Harvard University
19 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Tohoku University
19 publications, 0.87%
|
|
University of Bristol
19 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Paris Cité University
19 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Hokkaido University
19 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
19 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Yale University
18 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Monash University
18 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Colorado State University
18 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Meteorological Office
18 publications, 0.83%
|
|
British Antarctic Survey
18 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Montpellier
18 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
17 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology
17 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
|
|
USA
|
USA, 711, 32.69%
USA
711 publications, 32.69%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 389, 17.89%
United Kingdom
389 publications, 17.89%
|
China
|
China, 367, 16.87%
China
367 publications, 16.87%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 359, 16.51%
Germany
359 publications, 16.51%
|
France
|
France, 190, 8.74%
France
190 publications, 8.74%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 180, 8.28%
Australia
180 publications, 8.28%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 157, 7.22%
Switzerland
157 publications, 7.22%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 148, 6.8%
Canada
148 publications, 6.8%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 134, 6.16%
Italy
134 publications, 6.16%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 129, 5.93%
Netherlands
129 publications, 5.93%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 121, 5.56%
Japan
121 publications, 5.56%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 110, 5.06%
Norway
110 publications, 5.06%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 95, 4.37%
Spain
95 publications, 4.37%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 83, 3.82%
Sweden
83 publications, 3.82%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 77, 3.54%
Austria
77 publications, 3.54%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 73, 3.36%
Denmark
73 publications, 3.36%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 58, 2.67%
Brazil
58 publications, 2.67%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 54, 2.48%
Republic of Korea
54 publications, 2.48%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 45, 2.07%
Belgium
45 publications, 2.07%
|
India
|
India, 37, 1.7%
India
37 publications, 1.7%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 35, 1.61%
New Zealand
35 publications, 1.61%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 27, 1.24%
Finland
27 publications, 1.24%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 27, 1.24%
South Africa
27 publications, 1.24%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 25, 1.15%
Chile
25 publications, 1.15%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 23, 1.06%
Israel
23 publications, 1.06%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 21, 0.97%
Singapore
21 publications, 0.97%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 20, 0.92%
Poland
20 publications, 0.92%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 19, 0.87%
Portugal
19 publications, 0.87%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 19, 0.87%
Ireland
19 publications, 0.87%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 17, 0.78%
Russia
17 publications, 0.78%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 17, 0.78%
Saudi Arabia
17 publications, 0.78%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 15, 0.69%
Czech Republic
15 publications, 0.69%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 14, 0.64%
Greece
14 publications, 0.64%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 14, 0.64%
Iceland
14 publications, 0.64%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 13, 0.6%
Argentina
13 publications, 0.6%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 13, 0.6%
Mexico
13 publications, 0.6%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 10, 0.46%
Hungary
10 publications, 0.46%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 10, 0.46%
Kenya
10 publications, 0.46%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 10, 0.46%
Romania
10 publications, 0.46%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 8, 0.37%
Estonia
8 publications, 0.37%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 8, 0.37%
Turkey
8 publications, 0.37%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 7, 0.32%
Egypt
7 publications, 0.32%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 7, 0.32%
Malaysia
7 publications, 0.32%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 6, 0.28%
Indonesia
6 publications, 0.28%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 6, 0.28%
Iran
6 publications, 0.28%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 6, 0.28%
Cyprus
6 publications, 0.28%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 5, 0.23%
Ghana
5 publications, 0.23%
|
Greenland
|
Greenland, 5, 0.23%
Greenland
5 publications, 0.23%
|
Monaco
|
Monaco, 5, 0.23%
Monaco
5 publications, 0.23%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 5, 0.23%
Nepal
5 publications, 0.23%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 5, 0.23%
Pakistan
5 publications, 0.23%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 5, 0.23%
Peru
5 publications, 0.23%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 4, 0.18%
Bangladesh
4 publications, 0.18%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 4, 0.18%
Vietnam
4 publications, 0.18%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 4, 0.18%
Colombia
4 publications, 0.18%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 4, 0.18%
Malta
4 publications, 0.18%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 4, 0.18%
Nigeria
4 publications, 0.18%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 4, 0.18%
Tanzania
4 publications, 0.18%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 3, 0.14%
Bulgaria
3 publications, 0.14%
|
Bolivia
|
Bolivia, 3, 0.14%
Bolivia
3 publications, 0.14%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 3, 0.14%
Zimbabwe
3 publications, 0.14%
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo, 3, 0.14%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
3 publications, 0.14%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 3, 0.14%
Luxembourg
3 publications, 0.14%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 3, 0.14%
Morocco
3 publications, 0.14%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 3, 0.14%
Mongolia
3 publications, 0.14%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 3, 0.14%
Uganda
3 publications, 0.14%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 3, 0.14%
Ecuador
3 publications, 0.14%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 2, 0.09%
Kazakhstan
2 publications, 0.09%
|
Benin
|
Benin, 2, 0.09%
Benin
2 publications, 0.09%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 2, 0.09%
Brunei
2 publications, 0.09%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 2, 0.09%
Zambia
2 publications, 0.09%
|
Madagascar
|
Madagascar, 2, 0.09%
Madagascar
2 publications, 0.09%
|
Maldives
|
Maldives, 2, 0.09%
Maldives
2 publications, 0.09%
|
Rwanda
|
Rwanda, 2, 0.09%
Rwanda
2 publications, 0.09%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 2, 0.09%
Slovenia
2 publications, 0.09%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 2, 0.09%
Thailand
2 publications, 0.09%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 2, 0.09%
Philippines
2 publications, 0.09%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 2, 0.09%
Croatia
2 publications, 0.09%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 2, 0.09%
Sri Lanka
2 publications, 0.09%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 2, 0.09%
Ethiopia
2 publications, 0.09%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.05%
Ukraine
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 1, 0.05%
Algeria
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Belize
|
Belize, 1, 0.05%
Belize
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Bermuda
|
Bermuda, 1, 0.05%
Bermuda
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1, 0.05%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 1, 0.05%
Botswana
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 1, 0.05%
Venezuela
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Guadeloupe
|
Guadeloupe, 1, 0.05%
Guadeloupe
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.05%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 1, 0.05%
Costa Rica
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 1, 0.05%
Cuba
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 1, 0.05%
Latvia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.05%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 1, 0.05%
Malawi
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Mozambique
|
Mozambique, 1, 0.05%
Mozambique
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Moldova
|
Moldova, 1, 0.05%
Moldova
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Namibia
|
Namibia, 1, 0.05%
Namibia
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Niger
|
Niger, 1, 0.05%
Niger
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 0.05%
Oman
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 1, 0.05%
Panama
1 publication, 0.05%
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
|
4 profile journal articles
Konhauser Kurt
324 publications,
16 355 citations
h-index: 65
2 profile journal articles
Wanek Wolfgang

University of Vienna
302 publications,
13 640 citations
h-index: 60
1 profile journal article
Sugioka Hiroko
88 publications,
1 514 citations
h-index: 22
1 profile journal article
Varlagin Andrej
PhD in Biological/biomedical sciences

A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of the Russian Academy of Sciences
101 publications,
8 454 citations
h-index: 45
1 profile journal article
FAYMAN PAVEL

V.I. Il'ichev Pacific Oceanological Institute of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
18 publications,
150 citations
h-index: 8
1 profile journal article
Feron Sarah
44 publications,
1 413 citations
h-index: 20
1 profile journal article
Hartmann Tilo
49 publications,
2 079 citations
h-index: 21
1 profile journal article
Astakhov Anatolii
56 publications,
473 citations
h-index: 12
1 profile journal article
Wang Hao
93 publications,
2 764 citations
h-index: 29
1 profile journal article
Hopkinson Charles
111 publications,
10 126 citations
h-index: 51
1 profile journal article
Saxena Ankita
🥼 🤝
PhD in Education

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
12 publications,
176 citations
h-index: 6
Research interests
Global climate change
Land use
Solar energy
1 profile journal article
Varga Tamás
39 publications,
222 citations
h-index: 9