Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
journal names
The Journal of Clinical Monitoring
Top-3 citing journals

Anesthesia and Analgesia
(511 citations)

The Journal of Clinical Monitoring
(318 citations)

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
(221 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Florida
(53 publications)

University of Utah
(33 publications)

University of California, San Diego
(29 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 8763
Q1

Ligand Isomerism in Plladium(II)‐Based Multi‐Cavity Discrete Coordination Cages
Sharma S., John D., Chand D.K.
AbstractThe term ligand isomerism stands for two or more isomeric coordination complexes having regioisomeric ligands coordinated around the metal center. Single‐cavity discrete coordination cages (SCDCCs) and multi‐cavity discrete coordination cages (MCDCCs) are exotic class of self‐assembled complexes that should be suitable for exploration of ligand isomerism. This work describes rare varieties of double‐cavity tetranuclear, triple‐cavity pentanuclear and quadruple‐cavity hexanuclear MCDCCs to exemplify ligand isomerism. Square planar Pd(II) and pyridine‐based bis‐, tris‐ and tetrakis‐monodentate ligands are employed as the modular building blocks for constructing the cages. The frameworks of all the ten cages studied here (four reported and six new) contain trinuclear Pd3L6 type double‐walled triangular core (or sub‐framework) that is decorated with one, two and three units of Pd2L4 type entity or sub‐framework resulting in tetra, penta and hexanuclear MCDCCs, respectively. Suitable incorporation of isomeric arms as part of the double‐walled trinuclear core by sourcing from the basket of regioisomeric ligands would offer ligand isomerism in the MCDCCs. Our ligand design afforded four members for the tetra or pentanuclear and two for the hexanuclear architectures to demonstrate ligand isomerism in MCDCCs.
Q1

Ligand‐Free Pd‐Catalyzed Direct C‐H Arylation of Polyfluoroarenes with Aryl Iodides under Ambient Air Conditions
Budiman Y.P., Tasripin P., Ramadhan M.R., Hannifah R., Deawati Y., Mayanti T., Solihudin S., Putra M.H., Radius U., Marder T.B.
AbstractWe report the synergistic use of Pd(OAc)₂ and Ag₂O for the direct C−H arylation of polyfluoroarenes with aryl iodides in DMF as the solvent. This method is straightforward, can be conducted in air, and does not require additional ligands, yielding fluorinated unsymmetrical biaryl products in up to 99 %. Experimental studies and DFT calculations suggest that the formation of [(DMF)2PdII(C6F5)2] in DMF as a coordinating solvent does not inhibit the reaction, as the Pd complex reacts with aryl iodides by oxidative addition upon dissociation of a single DMF ligand to form [(DMF)PdIV(C6F5)2(Ar)(I)] before the desired arylation product is released. This contrasts with our previous report on the nucleophilic coupling between C₆F₅H and aryl‐Bpin, in which the formation of [(DMF)₂PdII(C₆F₅)₂] was found to halt the reaction.
Q1

Machine Learning Assisted for Preparation of Graphene Supported Cu‐Zn Catalyst for CO2Hydrogenation to Methanol
Pisitpipathsin N., Deshsorn K., Deerattrakul V., Iamprasertkun P.
Graphene has emerged as a promising support material for Cu‐Zn catalysts in CO2 hydrogenation to methanol due to its high surface area and potential for functionalization with heteroatoms like nitrogen and oxygen, with nitrogen believed to contribute to the reaction. In this study, we combined machine learning and data analysis with experimental work to investigate this effect. Machine learning (using a decision tree model) identified copper particle size, average pore diameter, reduction time, surface area, and metal loading content as the most impactful features for catalyst design, while nitrogen doping showed negligible influence on methanol space‐time yield. However, experimental results indicated that nitrogen doping on graphene support improved the space‐time yield by up to four times compared to pristine graphene. This improvement is attributed to nitrogen’s role in lowering the catalyst’s reduction temperature, enhancing its quality under identical reduction conditions, though nitrogen itself does not directly affect methanol formation. Moreover, machine learning provided insights into the critical features and optimal conditions for catalyst design, demonstrating significant resource savings in the lab. This work exemplifies the integration of machine learning and experimentation to optimize catalyst synthesis and performance evaluation, providing valuable guidance for future catalyst design.
Q1

Engineering Ni(OH)2 with Pd for Efficient Electrochemical Urea Oxidation
Mathew N., Rathod R., Saha S., Santra P.K., Pati S.K., Muthusamy E.
AbstractUrea‐assisted water electrolysis is a promising and energy‐efficient alternative to electrochemical water splitting due to its low thermodynamic potential of 0.37 V, which is 860 mV less than that needed for water splitting (1.23 V). Ni(OH)2 has proven to be an efficient catalyst for this reaction. However, the non‐spontaneous desorption of CO2 molecules from the catalyst surface leads to active site poisoning, which significantly impacts its long‐term stability. Herein, we have demonstrated that Pd incorporated NiOH2 (Pd/Ni(OH)2) results in a significant decrease in the overpotential by 40 mV at 10 mA cm−2 as compared to Ni(OH)2. The decrease in the Tafel slope and charge transfer resistance of Pd/Ni(OH)2 indicates an improvement in the kinetics of the reaction, resulting in a maximum current density of 380 mA cm−2 at 1.5 V, which is higher than that observed for Ni(OH)2 (180 mA cm−2). XAS analysis was utilized to determine the nature of the metal species in the catalyst. It revealed that while Pd predominantly exists in its metallic state within the bulk of the catalyst, the surface is enriched with the oxide phase. The presence of Pd prevents the strong adsorption of CO2 at the active site in Pd/Ni(OH)2, resulting in a substantial improvement of stability of up to 300 h as compared to Ni(OH)2. DFT calculations were performed to explore the detailed reaction mechanism of urea oxidation on Ni(OH)2 and Pd/Ni(OH)2. These calculations provided further insight into the experimental observations and evaluated the contribution of Pd in enhancing the catalytic efficiency of Ni(OH)2. Additionally, the operando Raman and IR spectroscopy were used to understand the formation of the active sites and the intermediates during urea electrooxidation.
Q1

Probing the Slow Relaxation of Magnetization of a Square Planar Cobalt Complex with Doublet Ground State
Ansari K.U., Borah D., Rasamsetty A., Kumar P., Shanmugam M., Rajaraman G., Shanmugam M.
AbstractThe observation of slow relaxation of magnetization in low‐spin square planar cobalt complexes is exceedingly rare, likely due to the synthetic challenges of stabilizing such geometries, along with the complexities introduced by hyperfine interactions and spin‐orbit coupling. Additionally, accurately characterizing the ground‐state electronic configuration of these complexes remains a significant challenge. In this article, we report a unique and rare square planar cobalt complex, [Co(L1⋅−)2] (1), where the coordination sites are occupied by the phenanthroiminoquinone (L1). The molecular structure of complex 1 was determined using single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies. A structurally analogous nickel complex, [NiII(L1⋅−)2] (2), was also synthesized and characterized. Detailed DC magnetic susceptibility measurements of 2 reveal strong antiferromagnetic exchange interactions between the radical centers, rendering it diamagnetic. For cobalt complex 1, this strong antiferromagnetic coupling results in a doublet ground state, as corroborated by X‐band EPR measurements (at 5 K) conducted on both polycrystalline and frozen solution samples. To gain deeper insights into the electronic structure of the cobalt ion in 1, a comprehensive suite of experimental and theoretical investigations was conducted, including X‐ray diffraction, DC magnetic studies, X‐band EPR, UV‐Vis‐NIR spectroscopy, and ab initio calculations. These studies collectively indicate that the cobalt ion in 1 exists in a divalent low‐spin state. Furthermore, the observed slow relaxation of magnetization for the doublet state of 1 highlights its potential as an ideal candidate for designing spin‐based molecular qubits.
Q1

Magnesium‐Mediated Cyanosilylation and Hydroboration of Arene and N‐Heteroarene Aldehydes: An Experimental and Theoretical Study
Roy D.K., Parveen D., Saha S., Yadav R.K., Pati S.K.
AbstractIn recent years, there has been a noteworthy expansion in the field of main‐group compounds, attributed to their intrinsic capacity for the activation of small molecules. In this regard, the alkaline earth metal complexes have garnered important attention. Herein, we showed the utilization of a Mg complex Mg‐1 as a catalyst in cyanosilylation reactions involving several aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes, conducted under mild reaction conditions. Although complex Mg‐1 demonstrated its effectiveness in this transformation, complexes Mg‐2 and Mg‐3 yielded lower amounts of cyanosilylated products, highlighting the influence of the ligand spacer in catalytic activity. To further assess this effect, a mononuclear magnesium complex, Mg‐4, was synthesized and the catalytic performance of Mg‐4 in the cyanosilylation of aldehydes was found to be lower than that of Mg‐1. This study establishes that magnesium complexes can independently catalyze the cyanosilylation of aldehydes, with those featuring an oxygen‐bridged spacer exhibiting enhanced catalytic efficiency. Furthermore, employing complex Mg‐1, we explored the cyanosilylation and hydroboration reactions involving N‐heteroarene carboxaldehyde, an area with limited substrate scopes. Experimental and theoretical studies were performed to establish the mechanism which shows that the cyanosilylation reaction initiates with the initial coordination of trimethylsilyl cyanide (TMSCN) with the catalyst, followed by the subsequent attack of aldehydes. Whereas, in the hydroboration reaction, HBpin first reacts with the Mg complex Mg‐1 to form Mg–H, which subsequently reacts with the aldehyde to form a hydroborylated product via a four‐membered transition state.
Q1

MXene‐induced construction of SnS2 nano‐arrays with sulfur vacancies for high‐efficiency photocatalytic CO2 reduction
Zhang P., Wang W., Wu J., Chen X., Shen X., Jin X., Sun Y., Yan C., Li Y.
AbstractSolar‐driven CO2 reduction has gained significant attention as a sustainable approach for CO2 utilization, enabling the selective production of fuels and chemicals. SnS2, a non‐precious metal sulfide semiconductor, has great potential in photocatalytic CO2 reduction due to its unique physicochemical properties. However, low electrical conductivity and susceptibility to aggregation of pure SnS2 lead to a high charge recombination rate and hinder the photocatalytic efficiency. In this study, we report that single/few‐layered MXene induces ordered growth of SnS2 through electrostatic interactions and in situ solvothermal heating. Interconnected SnS2 nano‐array with abundant sulfur vacancies was successfully prepared on MXene surface (Vs‐SnS2/MXene). This unique structure promotes the separation and migration of photogenerated charges and effectively inhibits electron‐hole recombination. Compared with pure SnS2, the average lifetime of photogenerated charges in Vs‐SnS2/MXene increased by 45.6 %. Meanwhile, its CO production rate reached 47.6 μmol⋅g−1⋅h−1, which was 2.6‐fold higher than that of pure SnS2 (18.3 μmol⋅g−1⋅h−1), and showed excellent photocatalytic CO2 reduction performance in gas‐solid‐phase reaction mode. In addition, Vs‐SnS2/MXene also showed excellent stability. The results showcased the transformative potential of integration strategies for designing high‐performance photocatalytic systems.
Q1

Hydrazonate‐Based Copper(II) Metallodrugs: Insights into Solution Behavior, G‐Quadruplex DNA Interaction, and Anticancer Potential
Mohanty M., Lima S., Pattanayak P.D., Das S., Buchholz A., Görls H., Plass W., Kaminskey W., Dinda R.
AbstractHere, two mixed‐ligand mononuclear [Cu(L1)py] (1), [Cu(L2)Him] (2) and one dinuclear copper(II) complex [Cu2(L3)2(DMSO)(MeOH)] (3) were isolated in solid state and characterized through single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. Herein, we highlight the solution behavior of these complexes in solution medium through HRMS and ESR. Though the complexes maintain their integrity with respect to the ligand coordination, there is solvent or co‐ligand exchange and generation of both [Cu(L)(py/Him)] or [Cu(L)(H2O)] species. G‐quadruplex (G4‐DNA) structures in the human telomeric DNA (hTelo) and promoter regions of oncogenes (c‐MYC) can behave as potential therapeutic targets for the cancer treatment. Hence, the interaction of these complexes with G4‐DNA and also duplex DNA was investigated through spectroscopy and molecular docking studies. The results reveal that the copper complexes show higher affinity for G4‐DNA over duplex DNA, with 3 demonstrating the strongest binding among them. The complexes have also been tested for DNA nuclease activity against pUC19 plasmid DNA. Finally, the complexes showed significant cytotoxicity towards cancerous cell lines, namely HeLa and MCF‐7 in comparison to the noncancerous cell line NIH‐3T3. Annexin V/PI double staining assay demonstrated the apoptotic mode of cell death caused by the complexes. Overall, the results of G4‐DNA interaction and anticancer activity are consistent, suggesting G4‐DNA is the target for their biological activity.
Q1

K/Cl Dual‐Mediated Spatial Charge Separation in Carbon Nitride Boosts Piezocatalytic Pure Water Splitting
Zhu Q., Wu F., Yuan J., Huang C., Qiu H., Zhou Y., Xu D., Zhang S., Wan H., Feng W.
Graphite‐phase carbon nitride is regarded as a highly promising piezoelectric catalyst, yet its interlayer and in‐plane charge transfer capabilities pose significant limitations to its application. Graphite‐phase carbon nitride is regarded as a highly promising piezoelectric catalyst, yet its interlayer and in‐plane charge transfer capabilities pose significant limitations to its application. In this study, Cl, K co‐modulated carbon nitride was synthesized via the molten salt method. The in‐plane introduction of Cl, which exhibits an electron‐withdrawing effect, breaks the symmetry of the carbon nitride crystals and enhances the structural polarity. Meanwhile, the interlayer intercalation of K reduces the localized states of electrons, and expands the π‐conjugated system, serving as a new transfer channel for carriers for facilitating the interlayer transfer of carriers. The piezocatalytic hydrogen production rate from pure water of the optimized CNM‐7.5 is 13.9 times that of the unmodified pristine CN. This work offers valuable foundation for application of piezocatalytic water splitting for hydrogen production, contributing to the advancement of hydrogen energy technology and the realization of a clean and sustainable energy system.
Q1

Effect of Carbon Nanomaterials Incorporated Polymeric Membrane Separators for Energy Storage Devices
Hossain M.E., Johan B.A., Shah S.S., Abdallah M., Rahman M.M., Baroud T.N., Aziz M.A.
AbstractThe rapid expansion of the global population and technological advancements have heightened the need for efficient energy conversion and electrochemical energy storage. Electrochemical energy systems like batteries and supercapacitors have seen notable developments to meet this demand. However, conventional polymeric membrane separators in these systems face challenges due to limited porosity and poor mechanical and thermal properties, reducing overall electrochemical performance. Researchers have incorporated nanoparticles into the polymer matrix to address these limitations and enhance separator properties. Carbon‐based nanomaterials, in particular, have gained prominence due to their unique features, such as surface‐dependent characteristics, size, porosity, morphology, and electrical conductivity. These properties make carbon‐based nanomaterials advantageous in improving energy storage compared to conventional materials. Advanced carbon‐doped polymeric membrane separators have emerged as a potential solution to the issues faced by conventional separators. Adding carbon nanoparticles, such as graphene‐based materials and carbon nanotubes to the polymeric separators of batteries and supercapacitors has helped researchers solve problems and improve electrochemical performance. This review article provides a state‐of‐the‐art overview of carbon‐doped polymeric membrane separators, their properties, fabrication processes, and performance in lithium batteries, as well as supercapacitors. It emphasizes advantages of these novel separator materials and suggests future research directions in this field.
Q1

Significant Insights into the Origins of Reaction Barriers Governing the Addition Reactions of Olefins with Singly Bonded G13/P‐Based and Al/G15‐Based Molecules
Su M., Wu S.
AbstractThe addition reactions of propylene with singly bonded G13/P‐based (G13=Group 13 element) and B/G15‐based (G15=Group 15 element) molecules, all yielding the >G13–G15< geometrical structure, have been analyzed theoretically using density functional theory (DFT). The current DFT findings indicate that, of all singly bonded G13/P‐based and Al/G15‐based molecules, only Al/P‐Rea can reversibly carry out the [2+2] addition reaction with propylene, both from kinetic and thermodynamic viewpoints. The activation strain model suggests that the deformation energy of the singly bonded >G13–G15< fragment is pivotal in determining the barrier heights that allow for optimal orbital interactions between G13/P‐Rea, Al/G15‐Rea, and propylene. Our theoretical analyses demonstrates that donor–acceptor bonding (singlet–singlet) has a greater impact compared to electron‐sharing bonding (triplet–triplet) in the transition states G13/P‐TS and Al/G15‐TS. Sophisticated analytical frameworks suggest that the forward interaction (lone pair (G15)→p‐π* of C=C in propylene) predominantly affects the addition reactions of singly bonded G13/P‐Rea and Al/G15‐Rea with propylene, whereas the backward interaction (p‐π*(G13) ← p‐π of C=C in propylene) is less influential. Our current DFT calculations, focusing on the structures and relative energetics of stationary points analyzed through the earlier mentioned advanced methods, conform to the Hammond postulate.
Q1

Molecular Architecture and Single‐Molecule Magnet behavior Control by Playing with Lanthanide Ionic Radii and Bulkiness Ancillary Ligands
Pointillart F., Douib H., Lefeuvre B., Dhbaibi K., Gonzalez J.F., Dorcet V.F.
AbstractA library of three dinuclear complexes [Yb(hfac)3(L)]2⋅3(CH2Cl2) (1)⋅3(CH2Cl2), [Dy2(hfac)6(L)3]⋅3(CHCl3) (4)⋅3(CHCl3), [Yb(tta)3(L)]2 (6), four dinuclear enantiomers [Ln(facam)3(L)]2⋅CH2Cl2 Ln=Dy ((−)7⋅CH2Cl2, (+)7⋅CH2Cl2) and Yb ((−)8⋅CH2Cl2, (+)8⋅CH2Cl2), two tetranuclear complexes [Ln2(hfac)6(L)]2⋅(CH2Cl2)n (Ln=Yb, n =1 (2)⋅CH2Cl2; Ln=Dy, n=0 (3)) and two pentanuclear complexes [Dy5(hfac)15(L)3]⋅2(C2H4Cl2) (5)⋅2(C2H4Cl2) and [Nd5(hfac)15(L)3]⋅2(CH2Cl2) (10)⋅2(CH2Cl2) (1,1,1,5,5,5‐hexafluoroacetylacetonate (hfac−), 2‐tenoyltrifluoroacetylacetonate (tta−), 3‐(trifluoro‐acetyl‐(+/−)‐camphorate (facam−) and L=[4’‐(4’’’‐pyridyl‐N‐oxide)‐1,2’:6’1’’‐bis‐(pyrazolyl)pyridine] ligand) were isolated and characterized by single crystal X‐ray diffraction. The final molecular architectures could be controlled by playing with the ionic radii of Yb(III), Dy(III) and Nd(III) ions and steric hindrance of the β‐diketonate. Natural circular dichroism (NCD) highlighted no exciton CD couplet for chiral compounds. All the compounds involving Nd(III) in both O9 and N3O6, Dy(III) in O9 and Yb(III) in both O8 and N3O6 coordination sphere present field‐induced SMM while Dy(III) in O8 environment displays SMM behavior in zero applied dc field. The relaxation of the magnetization occurs mainly through a Raman process with contribution of QTM in zero field and Direct process under applied field. The relaxation time of the magnetization increases with the enhancement of the steric hindrance of the ancillary β‐diketonate ligands.
Q1

Nanoscale Metal–Organic Frameworks: An Emerging Versatile Tool for Next‐Generation Photodynamic Therapy
Attar G.S., Bhalla V., Kumar M.
AbstractPhotodynamic therapy has emerged as a potent strategy for treatment of cancer due to its non‐invasiveness, minimal toxicity, high spatial selectivity, and potential for combination therapies. However, self‐aggregation of photosensitizers, tumour hypoxia and low penetration depth of excitation photons remain prominent challenges towards its clinical application. Nanoscale metal‐organic frameworks have emerged as one of the most promising materials due to their tunable composition which allows the adjustment of optical and chemical properties by changing the metal ions or organic linkers. Due to their high porosity, they serve as carriers for photosensitizers and demonstrate high tumour accumulation rates, target specificity, and penetration depth with enhanced permeability and retention effect. This review aims to explore recent developments in nanoscale metal‐organic frameworks focusing on the design strategies to enhance their effectiveness in tumour microenvironment. Specifically, we have examined the approaches to address challenges posed by hypoxic tumour environment and tissue penetration depth of the various light sources. Furthermore, this review provides insights into the targeting strategies that improve the overall efficacy through stimulus‐activated release and sub‐cellular internalization of photosensitizers. Finally, we discussed the on‐going challenges and some future directions for harnessing their full potential as therapeutic agents for effective outcome of photodynamic therapy.
Q1

Recent Progress in the Chemistry of Ring‐Fused Azulenes: Synthesis, Reactivity and Properties
Shoji T., Ito S.
AbstractAzulene, a non‐alternative aromatic hydrocarbon, has attracted significant attention due to its unique electronic properties, and potential applications in organic electronics and optoelectronics. This review highlights recent advances in the synthesis, reactivity, and functional properties of ring‐fused azulene derivatives. The discussion encompasses classical synthetic routes, including the Ziegler–Hafner and Nozoe methods, as well as novel approaches such as transition metal‐catalyzed cyclizations. Key advancements in the construction of benzo[a]azulenes, naphthoazulenes, and other polycyclic azulene frameworks are detailed, emphasizing their regioselective functionalization and enhanced stability. Moreover, the incorporation of azulene moieties into polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and heterocyclic systems is explored, highlighting their potential applications in organic light‐emitting diodes (OLEDs), field‐effect transistors (OFETs), and photovoltaic devices. Special attention is given to azulene‐fused helicenes and nanographenes, which demonstrate promising chiroptical properties and extended π‐conjugation. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the synthetic strategies and emerging applications of azulene‐based compounds, contributing to the development of advanced materials for future electronic and photonic technologies.
Q1

Current Approaches in the Classification of PFAS: An Overview
Secundo L., Metrangolo P., Dichiarante V.
AbstractPerfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) represent a broad group of synthetic chemicals that have raised concerns related to their long‐term environmental persistence and potential health risks. Although several efforts have been dedicated to establishing international restrictions on their use, the definition of what qualifies as a PFAS remains a matter of debate among scientists, regulatory agencies, and industry. This article provides a brief overview of the different approaches proposed and adopted to date for identifying and grouping of these pollutants, either based on common structural motifs or on the combination of multiple factors, including functional uses, degradation behavior, physicochemical properties, and toxicity. The diversity and complexity of PFAS substances suggests the need of a multifaceted classification system that can guide regulatory efforts, risk assessment, and environmental monitoring through standardized criteria accepted on an international scale. A pivotal role in establishing a universal definition of PFAS will be played by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC), which is currently supporting a project on the terminology and classification of these chemicals.
Top-100
Citing journals
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
|
Anesthesia and Analgesia
511 citations, 4.57%
|
|
The Journal of Clinical Monitoring
318 citations, 2.84%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
221 citations, 1.98%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia
166 citations, 1.48%
|
|
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
163 citations, 1.46%
|
|
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
148 citations, 1.32%
|
|
Critical Care Medicine
134 citations, 1.2%
|
|
British Journal of Anaesthesia
128 citations, 1.15%
|
|
Anaesthesia
125 citations, 1.12%
|
|
European Journal of Anaesthesiology
120 citations, 1.07%
|
|
Anesthesiology Clinics of North America
113 citations, 1.01%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
108 citations, 0.97%
|
|
Physiological Measurement
92 citations, 0.82%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
91 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
79 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Intensive Care Medicine
67 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Chest
66 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Sensors
65 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Annales Françaises d Anesthésie et de Réanimation
63 citations, 0.56%
|
|
Paediatric Anaesthesia
55 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing
53 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Annals of Emergency Medicine
51 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Critical Care Clinics
46 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Perfusion (United Kingdom)
43 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia
42 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology
38 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Entropy
38 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Critical Care
37 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Resuscitation
36 citations, 0.32%
|
|
American Journal of Emergency Medicine
35 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Scientific Reports
34 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Neurosurgery
33 citations, 0.3%
|
|
IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine
32 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Emergency Medicine
30 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
29 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Anesthesiology
28 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology
28 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Anesthesia
27 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Current Anaesthesia and Critical Care
27 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
26 citations, 0.23%
|
|
American Journal of Veterinary Research
26 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Pediatric Pulmonology
25 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
24 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Biomedical Optics
24 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
24 citations, 0.21%
|
|
PLoS ONE
24 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia
24 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
23 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
23 citations, 0.21%
|
|
IEEE Sensors Journal
23 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Perinatology
23 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Annals of Thoracic Surgery
22 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Pediatric Research
22 citations, 0.2%
|
|
American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology
22 citations, 0.2%
|
|
EMC - Anesthésie-Réanimation
22 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Academic Emergency Medicine
21 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Biomedizinische Technik
21 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology
21 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Medical Engineering and Physics
21 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Pediatrics
21 citations, 0.19%
|
|
EMC - Médecine d 'urgence
21 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
20 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America
20 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Clinics in Perinatology
20 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Applied Physiology
20 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Computers in Biology and Medicine
19 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Blood Pressure Monitoring
19 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Anesthesiology Clinics
19 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
19 citations, 0.17%
|
|
EMC - Urgence
19 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Anesthesiology Clinics
18 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care
18 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
18 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
18 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care
18 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Neurosurgery
18 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
17 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
17 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Current Opinion in Critical Care
17 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine
17 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
16 citations, 0.14%
|
|
BMC Anesthesiology
16 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Bio-Medical Engineering
16 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
16 citations, 0.14%
|
|
IFAC Proceedings Volumes
16 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Baillière's Clinical Anaesthesiology
16 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
15 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
15 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Pediatrics
15 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Hypertension
15 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Clinics in Chest Medicine
15 citations, 0.13%
|
|
IEEE Access
15 citations, 0.13%
|
|
EMC - Anestesia-Reanimación
15 citations, 0.13%
|
|
ASAIO Journal
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
The Lancet
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Hypertension
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Psychosomatic Medicine
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Clinical Physiology
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine
14 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
|
|
Elsevier
2818 citations, 25.21%
|
|
Springer Nature
1422 citations, 12.72%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
1286 citations, 11.5%
|
|
Wiley
934 citations, 8.35%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
580 citations, 5.19%
|
|
297 citations, 2.66%
|
|
SAGE
258 citations, 2.31%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
218 citations, 1.95%
|
|
MDPI
205 citations, 1.83%
|
|
IOP Publishing
152 citations, 1.36%
|
|
Australian Society of Anaesthetists
81 citations, 0.72%
|
|
American Physiological Society
70 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
69 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
65 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Oxford University Press
62 citations, 0.55%
|
|
BMJ
62 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
58 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
44 citations, 0.39%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
40 citations, 0.36%
|
|
American Veterinary Medical Association
39 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
37 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
36 citations, 0.32%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
35 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
34 citations, 0.3%
|
|
American Thoracic Society
31 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
30 citations, 0.27%
|
|
AACN Publishing
29 citations, 0.26%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
28 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
27 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
25 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
24 citations, 0.21%
|
|
The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
24 citations, 0.21%
|
|
IGI Global
21 citations, 0.19%
|
|
World Scientific
19 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Japanese Society of Medical Instrumentation
19 citations, 0.17%
|
|
S. Karger AG
18 citations, 0.16%
|
|
AIP Publishing
17 citations, 0.15%
|
|
JMIR Publications
15 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
12 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
9 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Massachusetts Medical Society
9 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Medknow
9 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
9 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Association for Clinical Chemistry
7 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation
7 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Annual Reviews
7 citations, 0.06%
|
|
European Society for Artificial Organs (ESAO)
7 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Diabetes Technology Society
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
ASME International
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
ifmbe proceedings
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Edizioni Minerva Medica
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Royal Society
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Endocrine Society
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Society for Neuroscience
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
British Veterinary Association
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Physiological Society of Japan
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
F1000 Research
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
International Society for Neurofeedback Research (ISNR)
4 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Emerald
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Allen Press
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Lavoisier
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Speech Language Hearing Association
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Animal Hospital Association
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Roentgen Ray Society
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Japanese Circulation Society
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
European Control Association
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
EDP Sciences
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
University of California Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Diabetes Association
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Higher Education Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
MIT Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Portland Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
PeerJ
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Medcom Limited
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Tohoku University Medical Press
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japanese Association for Laboratory Animal Science
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Europa Ed
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
SciELO
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
National Library of Serbia
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Bioscientifica
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
University of Florida
53 publications, 6.32%
|
|
University of Utah
33 publications, 3.93%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
29 publications, 3.46%
|
|
Harvard University
28 publications, 3.34%
|
|
Brigham and Women's Hospital
25 publications, 2.98%
|
|
Stanford University
18 publications, 2.15%
|
|
Ohio State University
18 publications, 2.15%
|
|
Medical College of Wisconsin
15 publications, 1.79%
|
|
Yale University
14 publications, 1.67%
|
|
University of Washington
14 publications, 1.67%
|
|
Eindhoven University of Technology
13 publications, 1.55%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
11 publications, 1.31%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
11 publications, 1.31%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
9 publications, 1.07%
|
|
Duke University Hospital
8 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Arizona
8 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of South Florida
8 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University Hospital of Zürich
7 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
7 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Drexel University
7 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
7 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of California, Davis
7 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of California, Irvine Medical Center
7 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
7 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
7 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Emory University
7 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Columbia University
6 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Northwestern University
6 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore
6 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Thomas Jefferson University
6 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
6 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Texas Medical Branch
6 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Toronto General Hospital
6 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Cornell University
5 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Boston University
5 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Chicago
5 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
5 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
5 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
5 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Helsinki University Hospital
4 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Medical Center
4 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
4 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Food and Drug Administration
4 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Purdue University
4 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Erasmus University Rotterdam
4 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Wake Forest University
4 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
4 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
4 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Uppsala University Hospital
3 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Southern California
3 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Flinders Medical Centre
3 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Tufts University
3 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Loyola University Medical Center
3 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Michigan
3 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Baylor College of Medicine
3 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Utrecht University
3 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Hamamatsu University School of Medicine
3 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Temple University
3 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Louisville
3 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Louisiana State University
3 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Cleveland Clinic
3 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
3 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Massachusetts Amherst
3 publications, 0.36%
|
|
University of Iowa Health Care
3 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Uppsala University
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Tampere University Hospital
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Helsinki
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University Hospital of Bern
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Kuopio University Hospital
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Maastricht University
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Odense University Hospital
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Birmingham
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Universite Libre de Bruxelles
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Royal Adelaide Hospital
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Tokyo Denki University
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Case Western Reserve University
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
New York University Langone Health
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Boston Children's Hospital
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Harbor–UCLA Medical Center
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of California Davis Medical Center
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Loyola University Chicago
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of the West Indies at Cave Hill, Barbados
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University Hospital Ulm
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Ulm University
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University Medical Center Groningen
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Amsterdam University Medical Center
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University Hospital Innsbruck
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Vienna
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center
2 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
|
|
USA
|
USA, 514, 61.26%
USA
514 publications, 61.26%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 46, 5.48%
Netherlands
46 publications, 5.48%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 22, 2.62%
Japan
22 publications, 2.62%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 21, 2.5%
Germany
21 publications, 2.5%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 18, 2.15%
United Kingdom
18 publications, 2.15%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 16, 1.91%
Finland
16 publications, 1.91%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 14, 1.67%
Canada
14 publications, 1.67%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 14, 1.67%
Switzerland
14 publications, 1.67%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 12, 1.43%
Australia
12 publications, 1.43%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 12, 1.43%
Denmark
12 publications, 1.43%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 7, 0.83%
Austria
7 publications, 0.83%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 7, 0.83%
Sweden
7 publications, 0.83%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 5, 0.6%
Italy
5 publications, 0.6%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 4, 0.48%
Belgium
4 publications, 0.48%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 4, 0.48%
Israel
4 publications, 0.48%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 4, 0.48%
Republic of Korea
4 publications, 0.48%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 4, 0.48%
Chile
4 publications, 0.48%
|
France
|
France, 3, 0.36%
France
3 publications, 0.36%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 3, 0.36%
South Africa
3 publications, 0.36%
|
China
|
China, 2, 0.24%
China
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Barbados
|
Barbados, 2, 0.24%
Barbados
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 2, 0.24%
Poland
2 publications, 0.24%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.12%
Russia
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 0.12%
Brazil
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.12%
Greece
1 publication, 0.12%
|
India
|
India, 1, 0.12%
India
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.12%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.12%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 1, 0.12%
New Zealand
1 publication, 0.12%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.12%
Norway
1 publication, 0.12%
|
100
200
300
400
500
600
|