Open Access
International Journal of Educational Research Open
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
SJR
1.012
CiteScore
8.9
Categories
Education
Areas
Social Sciences
Years of issue
2020-2025
journal names
International Journal of Educational Research Open
Top-3 citing journals

Education Sciences
(105 citations)

Frontiers in Education
(104 citations)

Education and Information Technologies
(98 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Queen's University Belfast
(15 publications)

Jadavpur University
(5 publications)

Stockholm University
(5 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 4591
Q1

Microwave sea ice and ocean brightness temperature and emissivity between 22 and 243 GHz from ship-based radiometers
Rückert J.E., Walbröl A., Risse N., Krobot P., Haseneder-Lind R., Mech M., Ebell K., Spreen G.
Abstract
Passive microwave measurements of Arctic sea ice have been conducted over the last 50 years from space and during airborne, ship- and ground-based measurement campaigns. The different radiometric signatures of distinct surface types have led to satellite retrievals of, e.g., sea-ice concentration. In contrast, ground-based upward-viewing radiometers measure radiation emitted from the atmosphere and are used to retrieve atmospheric variables. Here, we present results from a ship-based radiometer setup with a mirror construction, which allows us to switch between atmospheric and surface measurements flexibly. This way, in summer 2022, surface observations in the Arctic marginal sea-ice zone could be performed from the research vessel Polarstern by two radiometers covering the frequency range from 22 to 243 GHz. At low frequencies, the brightness temperatures show clear signatures of different surface conditions. We estimate emissivities at 53∘ zenith angle from infrared-based skin temperatures. Predominantly vertically polarized 22–31 GHz emissivities are between 0.51 and 0.55 for open ocean and around 0.95 for sea ice. Predominantly horizontally polarized 243 GHz ocean emissivities are around 0.78 and ice surfaces exhibit a large variability from 0.67 to 0.82. Our results can improve the characterization of surface emissions in satellite retrieval algorithms.
Q1

Characteristics, origin, and significance of chessboard subgrain boundaries in the WAIS Divide Ice Core
Fitzpatrick J.J., Wilen L.A., Voigt D.E., Alley R.B., Fegyveresi J.M.
Q1

Distributed energy balance, mass balance and climate sensitivity of upper Chandra Basin glaciers, western Himalaya
Oulkar S.N., Sharma P., Pratap B., Thamban M., Laha S., Patel L.K., Singh A.T.
Abstract
Glacier and snow melt are the primary sources of water for streams, and rivers in upper Indus region of the western Himalaya. However, the magnitude of runoff from this glacierized basin is expected to vary with the available energy in the catchment. Here, we used a physically based energy balance model to estimate the surface energy and surface mass balance (SMB) of the upper Chandra Basin glaciers for 7 hydrological years from 2015 to 2022. A strong seasonality is observed, with net radiation being the dominant energy flux in the summer, while latent and sensible heat flux dominated in the winter. The estimated mean annual SMB of the upper Chandra Basin glaciers is −0.51 ± 0.28 m w.e. a−1, with a cumulative SMB of −3.54 m w.e during 7 years from 2015 to 2022. We find that the geographical factors like aspect, slope, size and elevation of the glacier contribute towards the spatial variability of SMB within the study region. The findings reveal that a 42% increase in precipitation is necessary to counteract the additional mass loss resulting from a 1°C increase in air temperature for the upper Chandra Basin glaciers.
Q1

Forecasting Arctic sea ice drift: insights from two case studies
Valisuo I., Tietsche S.
Abstract
The two main large-scale features of Arctic sea-ice drift are the Beaufort Gyre and the Transpolar Drift Stream. They exhibit strong intraseasonal and interannual variability. Winter 2016/17 showed increased cyclone activity, leading to the collapse of the Beaufort Sea high and the reversal of the Beaufort Gyre. Winter 2020/21 displayed decreased cyclone activity and intense anticyclonic ice transport in the Beaufort Gyre. Here we show that the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts’s (ECMWF) extended-range (46 days) retrospective forecasts were able to predict the ice motion during these cases. The initial contrasts in sea level pressure, surface winds and ice drift were well captured, and their temporal evolution—including the reversal of the usual drift direction—well reproduced by the forecasts initialized about a week before the event. Sea-ice thickness in the forecast exhibited initial errors even greater than 1 m that persisted throughout the forecast and negatively affected the ice speed forecast. Despite these shortcomings, the dynamic forecast outperformed the persistence and climatology forecast and represented the observed relation between surface winds and ice drift well. The benefit of dynamic forecasts is especially clear in cases that differ from climatology, like the one we focus on.
Q1

Bragg scattering of surface-gravity waves by an ice shelf with rolling surface morphology
Konovalov Y.V.
Abstract
The propagation of elastic-flexural–gravity waves through an ice shelf is modeled using full three-dimensional elastic models that are coupled with a treatment of under-shelf sea-water flux: (i) finite-difference model (Model 1), (ii) finite-volume model (Model 2) and (iii) depth-integrated finite-difference model (Model 3). The sea-water flow under the ice shelf is described by a wave equation involving the pressure (the sea-water flow is treated as a “potential flow”). Numerical experiments were undertaken for an ice shelf with ‘rolling’ surface morphology, which implies a periodic structure of the ice shelf. The propagation of ocean waves through an ice shelf with rolling surface morphology is accompanied by Bragg scattering (also called Floquet band insulation). The numerical experiments reveal that band gaps resulting from this scattering occur in the dispersion spectra in frequency bands that are consistent with the Bragg’s law. Band gaps render the medium opaque to wave, that is, essentially, the abatement of the incident ocean wave by ice shelf with rolling surface morphology is observed in the models. This abatement explains the ability of preserving of ice shelves like the Ward Hunt Ice Shelf, Ellesmere Island, Canadian Arctic, from the possible resonant-like destroying impact of ocean swell.
Q1

Towards a high-resolution sea ice model: exploring the potential of modelling ice floe fracture with the peridynamic method
Zhang Y., Lu W., Lubbad R., Løset S., Tsarau A., Høyland K.V.
Abstract
Sea-ice deformation is concentrated at linear kinematic features such as ridges and leads. Ridging and leads opening processes are highly related to sea-ice fracture. Different rheology models have been successfully applied in various scenarios. However, most of the approaches adopted are based on continuum mechanics that do not explicitly model fracture processes. There are emerging needs for a more physically informed modelling methods that explicitly address fracture at the kilometre scale. In pursuing this objective, in this paper we explored the potential of applying a promising mesh free numerical method, peridynamics (PD), in modelling ice floe (~km) fractures. PD offers a physically and mathematically consistent theory through which spontaneous emergence and propagation of cracks can be achieved. The integral nature of the governing equations in PD remains valid even if a crack appears. We numerically investigated in this paper the tensile fracture (e.g. lead opening) of an elastic heterogenous ice floe. The modelling results were compared with published numerical results obtained by another numerical method. The potentials and challenges of PD in this application are discussed and summarized.
Q1

Impact of varying solar angles on Arctic iceberg area retrieval from Sentinel-2 near-infrared data
Fisser H., Doulgeris A.P., Høyland K.V.
Abstract
Icebergs are part of the glacial mass balance and they interact with the ocean and with sea ice. Optical satellite remote sensing is often used to retrieve the above-waterline area of icebergs. However, varying solar angles introduce an error to the iceberg area retrieval that had not been quantified. Herein, we approximate the iceberg area error for top-of-atmosphere Sentinel-2 near-infrared data at a range of solar zenith angles. First, we calibrate an iceberg threshold at a
$56^\circ$
solar zenith angle with reference to higher resolution airborne imagery at Storfjorden, Svalbard. A reflectance threshold of 0.12 yields the lowest relative error of 0.19% ± 15.74% and the lowest interquartile spread. Second, we apply the 0.12 reflectance threshold to Sentinel-2 data at 14 solar zenith angles between
$45^\circ$
and
$81^\circ$
in the Kangerlussuaq Fjord, south-east Greenland. Here we quantify the error variation with the solar zenith angle for a consistent set of large icebergs. The error variation is then standardized to the error obtained in Svalbard. Up to a solar zenith angle of
$65^\circ$
, the mean standardized iceberg area error remains between 5.9% and −5.67%. Above
$65^\circ$
, iceberg areas are underestimated and inconsistent, caused by a segregation into shadows and sun-facing slopes.
Q1

Spatiotemporal mass balance variability of Jostedalsbreen ice cap, Norway, revealed by a temperature-index model with data assimilation
Sjursen K.H., Dunse T., Schuler T.V., Andreassen L.M., Åkesson H.
Abstract
Jostedalsbreen in western Norway is the mainland Europe's largest ice cap and a complex system of more than 80 glaciers. While observational records indicate a significant sensitivity to climate fluctuations, knowledge about ice-cap wide spatiotemporal mass changes and their drivers remain sparse. Here, we quantify the surface mass balance (SMB) of Jostedalsbreen from 1960 to 2020 using a temperature-index model within a Bayesian framework. We assimilate seasonal glaciological SMB to constrain accumulation and ablation, and geodetic mass balance to adjust model parameters for each glacier individually. Overall, we find that Jostedalsbreen has experienced a small mass loss of −0.07 m w.e. a−1 (−0.21 to +0.08 m w.e. a−1), but with substantial spatiotemporal variability. Our results suggest that winter SMB variations were the main control on annual SMB between 1960 and 2000, while increasingly negative summer SMB is responsible for substantial mass losses after 2000. Spatial variations in SMB between glaciers or regions of the ice cap are likely associated with local topography and its effect on orographic precipitation. We advocate for models to leverage the growing availability of observational resources to improve SMB predictions. We demonstrate an approach that incorporates complementary datasets, while addressing their inherent uncertainties, to constrain models and provide robust estimates of spatiotemporal SMB and associated uncertainties.
Q1

Open discussion at the IGS symposium on ‘The edges of glaciology’, 7 July 2023
Fowler A.C.
Abstract
There follows the open discussion which took place at the IGS symposium on ‘The Edges of Glaciology’, in July 2023. The discussion was curated by Doug Benn. The time of speaking in minutes and seconds into the Panopto recording is given in bold figures. The recording itself is provided as electronic supplementary material. It has been transcribed and edited by Andrew Fowler, with much (and much-needed) assistance from the participants. Footnotes (mostly references) are editorial intrusions.
Q1

U-net with ResNet-34 backbone for dual-polarized C-band baltic sea-ice SAR segmentation
Karvonen J.
Abstract
In this study, the U-net with ResNet-34, i.e. a residual neural network with 34 layers, backbone semantic segmentation network is applied to C-band sea-ice SAR imagery over the Baltic Sea. Sentinel-1 Extra Wide Swath mode HH/HV-polarized SAR data acquired during the winter season 2018–2019, and corresponding segments derived from the daily Baltic Sea ice charts were used for training the segmentation algorithm. C-band SAR image mosaics of the winter season 2020–2021 were then used to evaluate the segmentation. The major objective was to study the suitability of semantic segmentation of SAR imagery for automated SAR segmentation and also to find a potential replacement for the outdated iterated conditional modes (ICM) algorithm currently in operational use. The results compared to the daily Baltic Sea ice charts and the operational ICM segmentation and visual interpretation were encouraging from the operational point of view. Open water areas were located very well and the oversegmentation produced by ICM was significantly reduced. The correspondence between the ice chart polygons and the segmentation results was also reasonably good. Based on the results, the studied method is a potential candidate to replace the operational ICM SAR segmentation used in the Copernicus Marine Service automated sea-ice products at Finnish Meteorological Institute.
Q1

Comparing heterogeneity of sea ice models with Viscous-Plastic and Maxwell Elasto-Brittle rheology
Bourgett M., Losch M., Plante M.
Abstract
Classical sea-ice models in climate model resolution do not resolve the small-scale physics of sea ice. New methods to address this problem include modifications to established viscous-plastic (VP) rheology models, sub-gridscale parameterizations or new rheologies such as the Maxwell elasto-brittle (MEB) rheology. Here, we investigate differences in gridscale dynamics simulated by the VP and MEB models, their dependency on tunable model parameters and their response to added stochastic perturbations of material parameters in a new implementation in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology general circulation model. Idealized simulations are used to demonstrate that material parameters can be tuned so that both VP and MEB rheologies lead to similar cohesive stress states, arching behaviour and heterogeneity in the deformation fields. As expected, simulations with MEB rheology generally show more heterogeneity than the VP model as measured by the number of simulated linear kinematic features (LKFs). For both rheologies, the cohesion determines the emergence of LKFs. Introducing gridscale heterogeneity by random model parameter perturbation, however, leads to a larger increase of LKF numbers in the VP simulations than in the MEB simulations and similar heterogeneity between VP and MEB models.
Q1

Impact of internal wave drag on Arctic sea ice
Flocco D., Feltham D., Schroeder D., Aksenov Y., Siahaan A., Tsamados M.
Abstract
A parameterization of the impact of internal waves on momentum transfer at the sea-ice–ocean interface based on previous work by McPhee has been implemented in a sea-ice model for the first time. The ice–ocean drag from internal waves is relevant for shallow mixed layer depth and the presence of a density jump at the pycnocline and is also a function of the strength of the stratification beneath the ocean mixed layer and geometry of the ice interface. We present results from a coupled sea-ice–ocean model where the parameterization of internal wave drag has been implemented. We conducted simulations spanning the years from 2000 to 2017. We find a deceleration of ice drift by 5–8% in both winter and summer, but with significant spatial and temporal variation reaching seasonal average values of ~10%. The spatial variation of ice transport leads to local impacts on deformed ice of magnitude ~0.05 m (2–5%), and reductions in ocean-to-ice heat fluxes of ~1 W m−2, and a decrease in bottom melt of ~0.02–0.04 cm d−1. There is an increase of up to 15% in thickness and ice concentration in the Canadian Arctic and a 10% overall impact on the total sea-ice volume.
Q1

A reassessment of ice cliff dynamics upon debris-covered glaciers
Evatt G.W., Mayer C., Wirbel A., Abrahams I.D., Nicholson L.
Abstract
We present a new model for understanding ice cliff dynamics within a debris-covered glacier ablation zone. This simple energy-balance model incorporates a moving frame of reference, made necessary by the melt of the surrounding debris-covered ice. In so doing, this also formalises how different types of field measurements can be utilised and compared. Our predictions include showing: ice cliffs can endogenously select their own slope angles; that there should be an indifference between illuminated north- and south-facing ice cliff slopes; that ice cliffs grow steeper with thicker debris layers; that ice cliffs cannot stably exist below a certain critical debris thickness and that some modelling of ice cliffs (when not incorporating the moving frame) may incorrectly estimate ice mass losses. All of our results are produced using parametrisations from Baltoro Glacier, Karakoram.
Q1

Deriving iceberg ablation rates using an on-iceberg autonomous phase-sensitive radar (ApRES)
Schild K.M., Vaňková I., Sutherland D.A., Nicholls K.
Abstract
The increase in iceberg discharge into the polar oceans highlights the importance of understanding how quickly icebergs are deteriorating and where the resulting freshwater injection is occurring. Recent advances in quantifying iceberg deterioration through combinations of modeling, remote sensing and direct in situ measurements have successfully calculated overall ablation rates, and surface and sidewall ablation; however, in situ measurements of basal melt rates have been difficult to obtain. Radar has successfully measured iceberg thickness, but repeat measurements, which would capture a change in iceberg thickness with time, have not yet been collected. Here we test the applicability of using an on-iceberg autonomous phase-sensitive radar (ApRES) to quantify basal ablation rates of a large (~800 m long) non-tabular Arctic iceberg during an intensive 2019 summer field campaign in Sermilik Fjord, southeast Greenland. We find that ApRES can be used to measure basal ablation even over a short deployment period (10 d), and also provide a lower bound on sidewall melt. This study fills a critical gap in iceberg research and pushes the limits of field instrumentation.
Q1

On sea ice emission modeling for MOSAiC's L-band radiometric measurements
Hernández-Macià F., Gabarró C., Huntemann M., Naderpour R., Johnson J.T., Jezek K.C.
Abstract
The retrieval of sea ice thickness using L-band passive remote sensing requires robust models for emission from sea ice. In this work, measurements obtained from surface-based radiometers during the MOSAiC expedition are assessed with the Burke, Wilheit and SMRT radiative transfer models. These models encompass distinct methodologies: radiative transfer with/without wave coherence effects, and with/without scattering. Before running these emission models, the sea ice growth is simulated using the Cumulative Freezing Degree Days (CFDD) model to further compute the evolution of the ice structure during each period. Ice coring profiles done near the instruments are used to obtain the initial state of the computation, along with Digital Thermistor Chain (DTC) data to derive the sea ice temperature during the analyzed periods. The results suggest that the coherent approach used in the Wilheit model results in a better agreement with the horizontal polarization of the in situ measured brightness temperature. The Burke and SMRT incoherent models offer a more robust fit for the vertical component. These models are almost equivalent since the scattering considered in SMRT can be safely neglected at this low frequency, but the Burke model misses an important contribution from the snow layer above sea ice. The results also suggest that a more realistic permittivity falls between the spheres and random needles formulations, with potential for refinement, particularly for L-band applications, through future field measurements.
Top-100
Citing journals
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
|
Education Sciences
105 citations, 2.97%
|
|
Frontiers in Education
104 citations, 2.94%
|
|
Education and Information Technologies
98 citations, 2.77%
|
|
Sustainability
97 citations, 2.75%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
86 citations, 2.43%
|
|
International Journal of Educational Research Open
71 citations, 2.01%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
60 citations, 1.7%
|
|
Handbook of Research on Teaching Methods in Language Translation and Interpretation
56 citations, 1.59%
|
|
Heliyon
54 citations, 1.53%
|
|
Innovative Digital Practices and Globalization in Higher Education
43 citations, 1.22%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
35 citations, 0.99%
|
|
Cogent Education
33 citations, 0.93%
|
|
PLoS ONE
33 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Teaching and Teacher Education
28 citations, 0.79%
|
|
AIP Conference Proceedings
25 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
21 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Interactive Learning Environments
17 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Marketing the Green School
17 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Communications in Computer and Information Science
16 citations, 0.45%
|
|
BMC Medical Education
15 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Discover Education
15 citations, 0.42%
|
|
International Journal of Management Education
14 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice
13 citations, 0.37%
|
|
International Journal of Educational Research
13 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Psychology in the Schools
13 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
13 citations, 0.37%
|
|
International Journal of Educational Management
13 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Behavioral Sciences
12 citations, 0.34%
|
|
SAGE Open
12 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
11 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Social Sciences
11 citations, 0.31%
|
|
E-Learning
11 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education
10 citations, 0.28%
|
|
European Journal of Psychology of Education
10 citations, 0.28%
|
|
SN Social Sciences
10 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Educational Technology
9 citations, 0.25%
|
|
European Journal of Education
9 citations, 0.25%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
9 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
8 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs
8 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education
8 citations, 0.23%
|
|
International Journal of Educational Development
7 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Scientific Reports
7 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Leadership and Policy in Schools
7 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
7 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Law and Sustainable Development
7 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Remodelling Businesses for Sustainable Development
7 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Early Childhood Education Journal
6 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Social Psychology of Education
6 citations, 0.17%
|
|
System
6 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of American College Health
6 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Policy Futures in Education
6 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research
6 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering
6 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Educational Management Administration and Leadership
6 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Education 3-13
6 citations, 0.17%
|
|
F1000Research
6 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Thinking Skills and Creativity
6 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Higher Education
6 citations, 0.17%
|
|
IEEE Access
6 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Psychological Science and Education
6 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
6 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Artificial Intelligence in Data and Big Data Processing
6 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Artificial Intelligence Applications in Distance Education
6 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Computers in Education
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Work
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Current Psychology
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Teacher Development
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Teacher Educator
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Review of Education
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
SN Computer Science
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Quality Assurance in Education
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
International Journal of Science Education
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Asia Pacific Journal of Education
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
International Journal of Technology and Design Education
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
School Leadership and Management
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Globalisation, Societies and Education
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Technology, Knowledge and Learning
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Educational Psychology
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Educational Research Review
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Educational Technology Research and Development
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
International Journal of Inclusive Education
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Societies
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Trends in Higher Education
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Asian Association of Open Universities Journal
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Computers and Education Open
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Fisioterapia em Movimento
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478)
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Quality Education for All
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Innovative Higher Education
3 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems
3 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies
3 citations, 0.08%
|
|
International Journal of Music Education
3 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning
3 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
|
Citing publishers
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
|
Springer Nature
681 citations, 19.28%
|
|
Elsevier
428 citations, 12.12%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
408 citations, 11.55%
|
|
MDPI
389 citations, 11.01%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
228 citations, 6.46%
|
|
IGI Global
199 citations, 5.63%
|
|
SAGE
164 citations, 4.64%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
146 citations, 4.13%
|
|
Wiley
140 citations, 3.96%
|
|
Emerald
136 citations, 3.85%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
41 citations, 1.16%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
34 citations, 0.96%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
31 citations, 0.88%
|
|
AIP Publishing
26 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Oxford University Press
18 citations, 0.51%
|
|
EDP Sciences
17 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
15 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
14 citations, 0.4%
|
|
SciELO
13 citations, 0.37%
|
|
F1000 Research
13 citations, 0.37%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
13 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
11 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
10 citations, 0.28%
|
|
JMIR Publications
9 citations, 0.25%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
8 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
8 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
6 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
5 citations, 0.14%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
AOSIS
4 citations, 0.11%
|
|
IOS Press
3 citations, 0.08%
|
|
IOP Publishing
3 citations, 0.08%
|
|
PAGEPress Publications
3 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Scandinavian University Press / Universitetsforlaget AS
3 citations, 0.08%
|
|
IntechOpen
3 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Modestum Ltd
3 citations, 0.08%
|
|
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
3 citations, 0.08%
|
|
National Research Mordovia State University MRSU
3 citations, 0.08%
|
|
RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Arastirmalari Dergisi
3 citations, 0.08%
|
|
World Scientific
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Universidad del Zulia
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Masaryk University Press
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Editura Economica
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Oxford Brookes University
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Verlag Hans Huber AG
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Medknow
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Publishing House Finance and Credit
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Human Kinetics
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
SLACK
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
The Japanese Association of Educational Psychology
2 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Begell House
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Johann Ambrosius Barth
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
National Assn. of Social Workers
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Anadolu University, Faculty of Communication Sciences
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Vilnius University Press
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Scientific Methodical Center
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
American Dental Education Association
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Anadolu University
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Moscow Polytechnic University
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Wilfrid Laurier University Press
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
National Association of School Psychologists
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Academic Journals
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
BMJ
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE)
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
National Library of Serbia
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Knowledge E DMCC
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Publishing House Science
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
State Public Scientific Technological Library SB RAS
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Intellect
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
The Japanese Psychological Association
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Scientific Scholar
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Minin University
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Turan University
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Bulletin of Kazakh National Women's Teacher Training University
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Pamukkale University
1 citation, 0.03%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
Publishing organizations
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
|
Queen's University Belfast
15 publications, 3.35%
|
|
Jadavpur University
5 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Stockholm University
5 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Griffith University
5 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Gaziantep University
4 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
4 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Zhengzhou University
4 publications, 0.89%
|
|
Qatar University
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Bern
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Stavanger
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Queensland
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Eötvös Loránd University (University of Budapest)
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Ghana
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Boston College
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Toronto
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Texas A&M University
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University College Dublin
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Lethbridge
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Winnipeg
3 publications, 0.67%
|
|
King Abdulaziz University
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
United Arab Emirates University
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Free University of Berlin
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Malmö University
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Zurich
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Eindhoven University of Technology
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Fribourg
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Durham University
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Cambridge
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Oslo
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Monash University
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Macquarie University
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Charles Sturt University
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of South Africa
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Arizona State University
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of California, San Diego
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Kobe University
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Purdue University
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Kaiserslautern-Landau
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Tottori University
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Surrey
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Ulster
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Universidad de Antioquia
2 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Umm al-Qura University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Kharazmi University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Zayed University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Al Ain University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Hasan Kalyoncu University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Calcutta
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Ondokuz Mayis University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Christ University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Erzincan Binali Yildirim University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Afyon Kocatepe University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Tübingen
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Vietnam National University, Hanoi
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Can Tho University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Razi University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Beijing Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
South Asian University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Mizoram University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü Imam University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Amasya University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Ahi Evran University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Bahrain
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Genoa
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Malaya
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University Putra Malaysia
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Science, Malaysia
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Linköping University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Goa University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Helsinki
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Linnaeus University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Mälardalen University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Southwest University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
National Sun Yat-sen University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Basel
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of St. Gallen
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Xiamen University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Université Catholique de Louvain
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Turin
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University College London
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Aalborg University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Dundee
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Oxford
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University College Copenhagen
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
UiT The Arctic University of Norway
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Hohai University
1 publication, 0.22%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
Publishing countries
10
20
30
40
50
|
|
USA
|
USA, 50, 11.16%
USA
50 publications, 11.16%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 35, 7.81%
United Kingdom
35 publications, 7.81%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 19, 4.24%
Germany
19 publications, 4.24%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 15, 3.35%
Australia
15 publications, 3.35%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 12, 2.68%
Canada
12 publications, 2.68%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 12, 2.68%
Norway
12 publications, 2.68%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 11, 2.46%
Netherlands
11 publications, 2.46%
|
China
|
China, 10, 2.23%
China
10 publications, 2.23%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 9, 2.01%
Turkey
9 publications, 2.01%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 9, 2.01%
Sweden
9 publications, 2.01%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 8, 1.79%
Switzerland
8 publications, 1.79%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 8, 1.79%
Japan
8 publications, 1.79%
|
India
|
India, 7, 1.56%
India
7 publications, 1.56%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 7, 1.56%
Ireland
7 publications, 1.56%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 5, 1.12%
Belgium
5 publications, 1.12%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 5, 1.12%
Spain
5 publications, 1.12%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 4, 0.89%
Hungary
4 publications, 0.89%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 4, 0.89%
Ghana
4 publications, 0.89%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 4, 0.89%
Nigeria
4 publications, 0.89%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 4, 0.89%
South Africa
4 publications, 0.89%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 3, 0.67%
Portugal
3 publications, 0.67%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 3, 0.67%
Bangladesh
3 publications, 0.67%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 3, 0.67%
Greece
3 publications, 0.67%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 3, 0.67%
Denmark
3 publications, 0.67%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 3, 0.67%
Indonesia
3 publications, 0.67%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 3, 0.67%
Qatar
3 publications, 0.67%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 3, 0.67%
Colombia
3 publications, 0.67%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 3, 0.67%
Malaysia
3 publications, 0.67%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 3, 0.67%
Mexico
3 publications, 0.67%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 3, 0.67%
Saudi Arabia
3 publications, 0.67%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 2, 0.45%
Brazil
2 publications, 0.45%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 2, 0.45%
Vietnam
2 publications, 0.45%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 2, 0.45%
Iran
2 publications, 0.45%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 2, 0.45%
Italy
2 publications, 0.45%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 2, 0.45%
UAE
2 publications, 0.45%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 2, 0.45%
Republic of Korea
2 publications, 0.45%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 2, 0.45%
Tanzania
2 publications, 0.45%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.45%
Chile
2 publications, 0.45%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 2, 0.45%
Ecuador
2 publications, 0.45%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 2, 0.45%
Ethiopia
2 publications, 0.45%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.22%
Ukraine
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 0.22%
Austria
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 1, 0.22%
Bahrain
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 1, 0.22%
Bulgaria
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Bolivia
|
Bolivia, 1, 0.22%
Bolivia
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1, 0.22%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 1, 0.22%
Brunei
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 1, 0.22%
Egypt
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 1, 0.22%
Iraq
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Yemen
|
Yemen, 1, 0.22%
Yemen
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 1, 0.22%
Kenya
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.22%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 1, 0.22%
Malta
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 1, 0.22%
Peru
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.22%
Romania
1 publication, 0.22%
|
El Salvador
|
El Salvador, 1, 0.22%
El Salvador
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Syria
|
Syria, 1, 0.22%
Syria
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.22%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.22%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.22%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.22%
Finland
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Eritrea
|
Eritrea, 1, 0.22%
Eritrea
1 publication, 0.22%
|
Show all (32 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
|