International Journal of Applied Glass Science
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
WOS
Q2
Impact factor
2.1
SJR
0.428
CiteScore
4.5
Categories
Materials Science (miscellaneous)
Areas
Materials Science
Years of issue
2010-2025
journal names
International Journal of Applied Glass Science
INT J APPL GLASS SCI
Top-3 citing journals

Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids
(1128 citations)

Journal of the American Ceramic Society
(657 citations)

Ceramics International
(604 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
(29 publications)

Friedrich Schiller University Jena
(26 publications)

Pennsylvania State University
(19 publications)

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
(11 publications)

Pennsylvania State University
(10 publications)

University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague
(10 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 565
Q2

The design and implementation of an innovative indicated suicide prevention service in Melbourne
Isaacs A.N., Le Brun C., Swaminathan V.
Abstract
Background
Suicide prevention strategies are targeted at three levels: the general population (Universal), persons at risk (Selected), and persons who have attempted suicide or have suicidal ideation (Indicated). This study describes the implementation of an innovative indicated suicide prevention service that prioritizes peer and psychosocial support at one of Australia’s largest mental health services. The purpose of this paper is threefold. (1) To describe the process of designing and implementing an innovative indicated suicide prevention service in Melbourne (2) To compare the implementation framework developed around it with other relevant frameworks and (3) To describe its stages of care.
Results
Based on the activities undertaken by the ‘project champion’ in designing and implementing Clayton HOPE, a pragmatic framework of implementation (PFI) was developed. The PFI included six steps. 1: Determine client needs; 2: Plan the model of care; 3: Determine the workforce and other resource requirements to achieve client needs; 4: Establish the workforce and finalize the team; 5: Facilitate stakeholder buy-in and 6: Regular monitoring and evaluation. The steps of the PFI, fit within the Quality Implementation Framework, albeit in a different sequence, owing to variations in settings, organizational circumstances, and readiness for change. The PFI also enhances the Levels of Change model by including additional requirements. A five-stage model of care was developed and implemented. They are 1: Early engagement and empathetic support (within 24 h of referral); 2: Assessment of psychosocial needs and suicidal risk (within 72 h of referral) 3: Construction of a personal safety plan (within 7 days of referral) 4: Implementation of the personal safety plan and risk management (week 2 - week12) and 5: Discharge and handover to ongoing supports (12 weeks from enrollment).
Conclusions
The main implications of this work are twofold: (1) The implementation of innovative models of care can be achieved by a ‘project champion’ with the relevant experience, authority and determination when funding is available and (2) Indicated suicide prevention models of care can strike a balance between clinical and non-clinical interventions that are tailored to client needs.
Q2

Connecticut providers knowledge and attitudes towards use of extreme risk protection orders
Pandya N., Dodington J., Jacob J., Raskin S.
Abstract
Background
Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs) are a legislative tool that temporarily restrict firearm access and purchasing ability in patients at risk for harm. Data from four states with ERPO legislation, including Connecticut, estimates 17 to 23 filed ERPOs can prevent 1 suicide. Connecticut medical providers are permitted to independently file an ERPO directly to the courthouse. This survey assesses provider knowledge and attitudes towards use of ERPOs.
Methods
This study electronically surveyed providers from six hospitals regarding their current knowledge of the Connecticut ERPO law, perceived barriers to the use of the law and procedures that might make use more likely.
Results
114 providers completed the survey in 2022. 66 (57.8%) providers encountered at least 1 patient per year at risk for suicide with firearm access. Only 2 (1.7%) providers had ever initiated an ERPO, but both found it extremely helpful. Only 1 provider was extremely familiar with ERPO while 91 (78.9%) were not familiar. Barriers to using ERPO include negatively impacting the patient relationship, and not enough time to call and follow up. ERPO specific training, and trained on-site coordinators to help file and follow through were ways to encourage to ERPO utilization.
Conclusion
The majority of providers encounter at least one patient annually who may benefit from ERPO utilization. However, providers are largely unfamiliar with ERPO and the filing process. Time cost is the greatest barrier to its utilization. Provider training and trained coordinators to process ERPO were the two most requested supports to encourage providers to initiate ERPOs.
Q2

Survivor perspectives on research priorities for assessing mental health outcomes after school shootings: a qualitative study
Rencken C.A., Conrick K., Rhew I.C., Davis C.A., Rowhani-Rahbar A.
Abstract
Background
Firearm violence is a major public health problem and the leading cause of death among children and youth aged one to nineteen in the United States (US). School shootings, though a relatively rare form of firearm violence in the US, have been occurring with increasing frequency, exposing more than 380,000 students to such events since 1999. This study engaged school shooting survivors to identify key research areas regarding their mental health, aiming to enhance the relevance and impact of future research for this community.
Methods
Participants for individual and group interviews were recruited from survivor support groups and through snowball sampling between May and August 2024. The interview guide, based on a recent scoping review highlighting gaps in research on the mental health impacts of school shootings, facilitated discussions on participants’ experiences, needs, and research priorities. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Thirteen individuals participated (median age: 40 years; range: 18–47), including 11 former student survivors, one parent of a survivor, and one sibling of a victim. These participants represented ten school shootings from 1997 to 2022 across eight US states including Colorado, Florida, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Oregon, Tennessee, and Washington. Eight participants experienced a mass school shooting (four or more fatalities excluding the perpetrator).
Results
The study identified three key research priorities: (1) understanding the long-term mental health impacts of school shootings across the life course, (2) expanding research to include broader outcomes beyond traditional mental health metrics, and (3) diversifying research approaches, study designs, and study populations to better capture the varied experiences of survivors.
Conclusion
There is a need for researchers to explore a wider range of outcomes, communities, and timeframes when studying the mental health impacts of school shootings. Such investigations are essential for understanding the complex and unique aspects of recovery and resilience among survivors. Centering survivor perspectives enhances our understanding of ongoing challenges facing survivors of school shootings, which should be prioritized in designing and evaluating interventions and policies.
Q2

Effects of implementing permissive campus carry laws on rates of major violence at public colleges and universities
Kagawa R.M., Reeping P.M., Laqueur H.S.
Abstract
Background
Following the Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, which ruled a New York concealed-carry permitting requirement unconstitutional, laws restricting the public carrying of firearms in “sensitive places,” like college campuses, have received increasing attention. However, there is little evidence for whether permissive campus carry policies increase firearm violence or, via deterrence, reduce general crime on campus. We estimated the effect of implementing state laws allowing the carry of firearms on public college and university campuses on rates of violent crime and burglary.
Methods
Arkansas, Georgia, and Texas, containing 106 public institutions, implemented permissive campus carry laws in 2017, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Control institutions were all those in states that did not allow the carry of firearms on college campuses for the entire study period (2006–2019) (n = 324 institutions, 21 states). The rates of major violence and burglary per 1,000 enrolled students was obtained from the Office of Postsecondary Education Campus Safety and Security Statistics website. We use two-way fixed effects difference-in-differences models to estimate state-specific effects and a modified difference-in-differences approach that accounts for variation in treatment timing to generate an overall estimate.
Results
Differences in rates of major violence and burglary were not statistically distinguishable from zero in our main models and sensitivity analyses. The overall estimated difference in the rate of major violence following policy implementation was − 0.01 (− 0.113, 0.093). For burglary, we estimated a difference of − 0.02 (− 0.147, 0.106). Violence rates trended upward in treated states in the last exposure period, but differences were not consistently distinguished from the null.
Conclusions
This study does not find significant changes in crime rates following state implementation of permissive campus carrying laws. Decision-makers might therefore consider other factors such as the opinions of students, faculty, and staff regarding campus carry policies and feelings of safety, potential impacts on instructional quality and student engagement, and potential impacts on accidental or self-directed harm.
Q2

Understanding caregiver preferences for firearm locking devices in a pediatric emergency department
Lennon T., Kemal S., Shankar S., Tunick R., Lorenz D., Hoffmann J.A.
Abstract
Background
Around 40% of US households with children have a firearm kept in the home. This study sought to describe firearm storage practices and locking device preferences among caregivers of children presenting to a pediatric emergency department (ED).
Methods
We conducted a cross-sectional survey of caregivers of children presenting to a pediatric ED who endorsed having a firearm in the home from August 2023 to May 2024. A self-administered electronic survey inquired about current firearm storage practices and locking device preferences. Caregivers who endorsed any unsafe firearm storage practice (i.e., firearm stored unlocked, loaded, and/or with ammunition) were offered, based on their preference, a free cable gun lock, lock box, or gun safe along with safe firearm storage education materials. Caregivers given a device were surveyed 30 days later to reevaluate firearm storage behavior. McNemar’s test was used to evaluate differences in reported baseline locking device use. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to evaluate changes in storage behaviors (locked, unloaded, and stored separate from ammunition) from baseline to 30-day follow-up.
Results
Of 139 caregivers with a firearm in the home, 91% (n = 126) reported having a handgun and 41% (n = 57) reported storing firearms with triple safe storage. Safes/vaults were more frequently used (40%, n = 56) than cable gun locks (20%, n = 28) (p = 0.003). Factors involved in caregiver preference for firearm locking devices were: speed of access to firearms (47%, n = 66), strength of the device (45%, n = 63), and cost of device (42%, n = 58). Seventeen caregivers were provided a free device based on preference: 15 gun safes, 2 lock boxes, and 0 cable gun locks. At 30-day follow up, 70.6% (n = 12) of eligible caregivers responded, and the proportion of respondents who reported storing all firearms locked increased significantly from baseline (from 67 to 100%, p = 0.036).
Conclusions
Caregivers in a pediatric ED reported using safes most frequently and, when offered a device, preferred safes over other locking devices. After being provided a free device of their preference, all caregivers who completed follow-up surveys reported all firearms were locked. Healthcare and community organizations should align resources with caregiver preferences.
Q2

The influence of heatwaves on traffic safety in five cities across Québec with different thermal landscapes
Nazif-Munoz J.I., Gilani V.N., Rana J., Choma E., Spengler J.D., Cedeno-Laurent J.G.
Abstract
Background
This study assesses the impact of heatwaves on road safety in five Québec cities (Montréal, Québec City, Laval, Longueuil, and Sherbrooke) from June to September 2015–2022. Using Urban Heat Island (UHI), 90th and 95th percentile thresholds for heatwaves, we analyze their effects on collisions, traffic injuries, and killed and seriously injured (KSI) cases.
Methods
Traffic data were analyzed across two heatwave definitions, utilizing a time-stratified case-crossover design. UHI was approximated using the annual maximum of mean warm-season land surface temperatures (LST) derived from Landsat 8 (30 m resolution) over three consecutive years, identifying areas that stay hotter during the day and radiate excess heat at night. Heatwaves were defined as periods of at least two consecutive days with mean temperatures exceeding the historical 90th or 95th percentile of mean temperatures. Negative Binomial regression models were used to examine associations between UHI, heatwave events and traffic incidents. Models controlled for time varying variables such as rainfall, seasonality, and COVID-19 impacts.
Results
Heatwaves, particularly at the 95th percentile threshold, significantly increased traffic incidents in Montréal and Longueuil. In Sherbrooke, the 90th percentile threshold showed significant effects on collisions and injuries, while Québec City and Laval exhibit no significant associations. UHIs show a modest overall increase in collisions (IRR: 1.07) but limited effects on traffic injuries and KSI. Differences across cities highlight Montréal's higher IRR for collisions under heatwaves and lower IRR for KSI compared to Québec and Longueuil respectively.
Discussion and conclusion
The results indicate that cities like Montréal and Longueuil, with slightly stronger UHI and higher susceptibility to heatwaves, face increased road safety risks. However, UHI levels in Montréal were not significantly different from those in other cities, and heatwaves at the 95th percentile showed variability across regions. These findings highlight the need for targeted climate-adaptive strategies, such as green spaces and heat-reflective materials, to mitigate risks. Integrating climate resilience into urban planning remains critical as extreme weather events grow more frequent.
Q2

Snakebites and resource utilization in pediatric urban and rural populations in the United States: 2016–2023
Jeffries K., Sanders S.C., Ekdahl R., Williford D.E., Taylor M., Fisher C., Filipek J., Slagle B., Birisci E., Cantu R.M.
Abstract
Background
Nearly 7,000 snakebite injuries are reported yearly in the United States, with almost one quarter of those in the pediatric population. Due to increased exposure to snakes, rural children may experience different clinical outcomes for snakebite injuries. The goal of this study was to examine differences in resource utilization of rural and urban pediatric patients with snakebite injuries.
Methods
This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients aged 21 years and under presenting with venomous snakebites in the United States from January 1, 2016, through March 31, 2023, using the Pediatric Hospital Information System database and ICD-10 codes indicating snakebites. Comparisons were conducted to evaluate demographic and clinical characteristics in association with resource utilization and complications between patients living in rural areas and patients living in urban areas.
Results
The study included 2,633 patients from 23 states. The median age was 9 years; 61% of patients were male. Most patients were in the South and over 70% resided in urban areas. 82% of the population was admitted to a hospital, with median length of stay 1.59 days. Compared to urban patients, rural patients were more likely to be admitted and receive antivenom but were less likely to have an intensive care unit admission and have abnormal coagulation studies.
Conclusions
Rural pediatric patients with snakebites had different resource utilization and clinical complications than urban patients.
Q2

Structural racism and intimate partner violence perpetration among racially diverse men transitioning into fatherhood: an anti-racist approach to IPV prevention
Willie T.C., Linton S., Adams L.B., Overstreet N.M., Whittaker S., Faller T., Knight D., Kershaw T.S.
Abstract
Background
Young couples transitioning into parenthood are at elevated risk of experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV), in part, due to the social and economic stressors associated with this critical time. Interpersonal racial discrimination is a known risk factor for male-to-female IPV perpetration, however few studies have examined this relationship among men transitioning to fatherhood. Similarly, structural racism acknowledges how inequitable systems reinforce racial discrimination; yet, few studies have investigated whether structural racism relates to the discrimination-IPV perpetration association. This study examined relationships among structural racism, racial discrimination, stress, and IPV perpetration among racially diverse men transitioning into fatherhood.
Methods
Using data from the 2007–2011 American Community Survey, a structural racism was assessed using a latent variable with four indicators: racial residential segregation, education inequity, income inequity, and employment inequity. Individual-level prospective data were collected during 2007–2011 from 296 men in expectant couples recruited from obstetrics, and ultrasound clinics in Connecticut. Structural equation models were conducted to investigate longitudinal associations among structural racism, discrimination, stress, optimism and emotional IPV perpetration.
Results
Compared to white men, Black men were more likely to experience structural racism (B = 0.95, p <.001). Structural racism was associated with more racial discrimination (B = 0.45, p <.05), more stress (B = 0.40, p <.05), and less optimism (B=-0.50, p <.001). Racial discrimination was associated with more stress (B = 0.23, p <.05) and marginally associated with a greater likelihood to perpetrate emotional violence against a female partner (B = 0.23, p =.06). Stress was associated with a greater likelihood to perpetrate emotional violence against a female partner (B = 0.31, p =.05). The indirect path from structural racism to IPV perpetration via racial discrimination and stress was marginally significant (B = 0.05, p =.07).
Conclusions
This study provides evidence of the ways in which structural racism in housing, education, income, and employment can contribute to men’s use of aggression and violence against a female partner. Future intervention efforts to reduce emotional IPV perpetration could benefit from addressing structural racism.
Q2

A content analysis of the Orbeez® Gel Blaster injury challenge on TikTok
Schneider H.P., Reedy J.M., McAdams R.J., Swedler D.I., Manganello J.A., Roberts K.J., Middelberg L.K., McKenzie L.B.
Abstract
Background
TikTok is one of the fastest-growing social media platforms. With 50 million active daily users in the United States, videos on TikTok have the opportunity to reach an exceptionally large audience. It is of concern that some of these videos may be harmful, especially if they encourage dangerous or risky behavior that can increase injury risk. This is common for social media challenges, where people are encouraged to participate in and record a task and then post it on social media. The “Orbeez Challenge” was a challenge that went viral in 2022 and encouraged viewers to shoot water beads with Gel Blaster guns at others. The purpose of this study was to describe content for the “Orbeez Challenge” on TikTok, informed by pathways of the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM).
Methods
This study conducted a content analysis of TikTok videos related to the Orbeez challenge identified between October 5–11, 2022. A codebook was created by using abductive code generation, driven by an inductive iterative review of a sample of videos not included in the final study sample, and deductive code development to collect elements of the ELM.
Results
There were 125 videos in the final sample. Collectively, these videos had over 255 million views. Most (70.0%) of the creators were laypersons. Text (n = 97; 77.6%) and music (n = 83; 66.4%) were frequently present in the videos. Individuals were primarily shooting (47.2%) or loading (25.6%) the Gel Blaster. Nearly half (46.3%) of the content creators had between 10,000 and 500,000 followers. Most videos (n = 109; 87.2%) did not depict any injury prevention precautions, but of the 15 videos (12.0%) that did show injury prevention precautions, 14 (93.3%) were for eye protection.
Conclusions
This study characterized the content of the TikTok videos associated with the viral “Orbeez Challenge” and showed that TikTok videos could be characterized with guidance from a health communication theory. Despite their increased injury risk, the videos had high engagement and were most frequently posted by laypersons. This research presents an opportunity for countering injury challenges on social media and can guide injury professionals in designing and improving virtual health education campaigns.
Q2

Gender and ethnoracial disparities in Veterans’ trauma exposure prevalence across differing life phases
Rossi F.S., Nillni Y.I., Miller A.N., Fox A.B., Eliacin J., Schnurr P.P., Duke C.C., Gradus J.L., Galovski T.E.
Abstract
Background
Veterans show increased vulnerability to trauma exposure. Yet, there is limited research examining Veterans’ prevalence of experiencing different trauma exposure types by race, gender, and ethnicity and across unique phases of life (i.e., pre-military service, during service, and post-service). This study compares trauma exposure prevalence across women and men Veterans of differing ethnoracial identities (i.e., white, Black, Hispanic) within three life phases (i.e., pre-military service, during military service, post-military service).
Methods
This study examined survey data from 3,544 Veterans (1,781 women; 1,686 men) across six discrete data collection points (between August 2018 to March 2022). Surveys were mailed nationally and oversampled for women (51.6%) and Veterans living in high crime areas (67.6%). Veterans reported on their exposure to various trauma types (e.g., sexual assault, physical assault, community violence, captivity, serious accident, witnessing violent death) at each wave of data collection using items from a modified Life Events Checklist. Veterans also reported on demographic information (e.g., gender, race, ethnicity). Chi-square analyses were conducted to compare prevalence of reported exposure to each trauma type within each life phase across gender and ethnoracial groups.
Results
There were significant differences in trauma exposure prevalence across: (1) men vs. women Veterans; (2) white vs. Black vs. Hispanic Veterans; (3) Black vs. Hispanic vs. white women Veterans; and (4) Black vs. Hispanic, vs. white men Veterans. For example, in this study, Black men Veterans reported higher prevalence of intimate partner physical assault exposure pre-service (14.8%) and post-service (27.1%) than White men Veterans (9.0% and 13.8%; prevalence ratios = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.17, 2.32 and 1.96, 95% CI = 1.53, 2.51). White women Veterans were less likely to witness a violent death pre-service (11.5%) than Black (21.1%; prevalence ratio = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.42, 2.37) or Hispanic (18.1%) women Veterans.
Conclusions
Findings help uncover disparities within Veteran subgroups. They inform mental health treatment and prevention services to better meet the needs of all Veterans across differing life phases.
Q2

Age-related mortality risk in cycling trauma: analysis of the National Trauma Databank 2017–2023
Rowh M.A., Giller T.A., Bliton J.N., Smith R.N., Moran T.P.
Abstract
Background
Cycling promotes health but carries significant injury risks, especially for older adults. In the U.S., cycling fatalities have increased since 1990, with adults over 50 now at the highest risk. As the population ages, the burden of cycling-related trauma is expected to grow, yet age-specific factors associated with mortality risk remain unclear. This study identifies age-specific mortality risk thresholds to inform targeted public health strategies.
Methods
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) data (2017–2023) on non-motorized cycling injuries. A total of 185,960 records were analyzed using logistic regression with splines to evaluate the relationship between age and mortality risk. The dataset was split into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets. Age thresholds where mortality risk changed were identified, and models were adjusted for injury severity, comorbidities, and helmet use.
Results
The median patient age was 43 years (IQR 20–58). Four key age thresholds (12, 17, 31, and 69) were identified, with the largest mortality increase after age 69. Our model achieved an AUC of 0.93, surpassing traditional age cutoff models, with 84.6% sensitivity and 88.0% specificity.
Conclusions
Age is a significant predictor of mortality in cycling trauma, with marked increases in risk during adolescence and for adults over 69. These findings underscore the need for age-targeted interventions, such as improved cycling infrastructure for teens and enhanced safety measures for older adults. Public health initiatives should prioritize these vulnerable age groups to reduce cycling-related mortality.
Q2

Harnessing national data systems to understand circumstances surrounding veteran suicide: linking Department of Veterans Affairs and National Violent Death Reporting System Data
Hoffmire C.A., Schneider A.L., Gaeddert L.A., Logan J., Kittel J.A., Holliday R., Monteith L.L.
Abstract
Background
Veterans are at elevated risk for suicide compared to non-Veteran U.S. adults. Data sources and analyses to inform prevention efforts, especially for those who do not use Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare services, are needed. This study aimed to link VA and CDC’s National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) data to create a novel data source to characterize the circumstances precipitating and preceding suicide among Veterans, including among those who did not use VA healthcare.
Methods
Multi-variable, multi-stage, deterministic linkage of VA-Department of Defense (DoD) Mortality Data Repository (MDR) and NVDRS-Restricted Access Database suicide and undetermined intent mortality records within 189 state-year strata (42 states, 2012–2018). Three linkage stages: (1) exact (matched on: age, sex, death date, underlying cause of death, day of month of birth, first initial of last name); (2) probable (all but one variable matched); (3) possible (all but 2 variables matched). Linkage success and accuracy of NVDRS-documented military history were assessed.
Results
Across all state-years, 22,019 matches (89.20% of 24,685 MDR Veteran records) were identified (65.47% exact). When high missingness (2 + matching variables in > 10% of records; n = 23) or incomplete reporting (n = 12) state-years were excluded, match rate increased to 94.29% (77.15% exact). NVDRS-documented military history (ever served) was accurate for 87.79% of matched records, with an overall sensitivity of 84.62%. Sensitivity was lower for female (61.01%) and younger (17–39 years; 77.51%) Veterans.
Conclusions
Accurate linkage of VA-DoD and NVDRS data is feasible and offers potential to improve understanding of circumstances surrounding suicide among Veterans.
Q2

“You wished the ground would open and swallow you up”: Expert opinions on shame, the collective, and other cultural considerations for suicide prevention among Asian American and Pacific Islander veterans
Polzer E.R., Rohs C.M., Iglesias C.D., Mignogna J., Krishnamurti L.S., Holliday R., Monteith L.L.
Abstract
Background
Rates of suicide remain elevated among U.S. Veterans and have increased disproportionately among Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) Veterans. Knowledge is limited regarding suicide prevention considerations for clinicians working with AAPI Veterans, yet culturally responsive strategies tend to be most effective. To address this gap, we sought to elucidate subject matter experts’ perspectives regarding suicide prevention considerations for AAPI Veterans.
Methods
Qualitative interviews were conducted with 14 key informants (e.g., clinicians, researchers) in 2023 to understand their experiences with, and recommendations for, preventing suicide among AAPI Veterans in the Continental U.S. Interview transcripts were analyzed through thematic analysis, with an inductive approach.
Results
Key informants discussed the heterogeneity of the AAPI population and emphasized the need to balance cultural sensitivity and cultural humility in suicide prevention with AAPI Veterans. Fear of bringing shame and dishonor upon one’s family was described as a factor which may prevent AAPI Veterans from disclosing mental health concerns and suicide risk and which may prevent them from accessing healthcare services for mental health and suicidality. Suicide risk among AAPI Veterans was viewed as being shaped by shame and the centrality of the family-collective, with family conferring both protection against and risk for suicide. Cultural norms and beliefs regarding suicide were considered pertinent to suicide among AAPI Veterans and included beliefs about perseverance in coping with distress to permittance of suicide in specific circumstances. Somatic idioms were described as a means by which AAPI Veterans may communicate distress and suicidality, with key informants discussing how this may impact treatment and outreach.
Conclusion
Key informant interviews provided crucial insights into cultural factors salient to conceptualizing and addressing AAPI Veterans’ risk for suicide. These findings can be utilized to inform tailored suicide prevention for this population, with emphasis on addressing mental health stigma, considering somatic idioms of distress, and considering the role of family in suicide risk and prevention.
Q2

Trends in views of democracy and society and support for political violence in the USA, 2022–2024: findings from a nationally representative survey
Wintemute G.J., Crawford A., Tomsich E.A., Pear V.A.
Abstract
Background
In 2022, a nationally representative longitudinal survey in the USA found concerningly high prevalences of support for and personal willingness to engage in political violence, but those prevalences decreased in 2023. This study examines changes in those prevalences from 2023 to 2024, an election year in the USA.
Methods
Participants were members of Ipsos KnowledgePanel. Wave 3 of the survey was conducted May 23-June 14, 2024; invitations to participate were sent to all respondents to prior waves who remained in KnowledgePanel. Outcome measures concern justification for the use of violence to advance any of 17 specified political objectives, personal willingness to engage in political violence at 4 levels of severity and against 9 target populations, and expectation of firearm use in political violence. Outcomes are expressed as weighted proportions. Year-to-year change is based on the means of aggregated individual change scores, which have a potential range from 0 (no change) to ± 2.
Results
The 2024 completion rates were 88.4% (8896 respondents/10,064 invitees) overall, 91.6% (8185 respondents/8932 invitees) for invitees in 2024 who had responded in 2023, and 62.8% (711 respondents/1132 invitees) for invitees in 2024 who had responded in 2022 but not in 2023. After weighting, 50.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 49.5%, 52.3%) were female; weighted mean (SD) age was 48.5 (24.9) years. From 2023 to 2024, the prevalence of the view that violence was usually or always justified to advance at least 1 political objective did not change (2024: 26.2%, 95% CI 25.0%, 27.5%; 2023: 25.3%, 95% CI 24.1%, 26.5%). There were no changes from 2023 to 2024 in willingness to damage property, threaten a person, injure a person, or kill a person in an act of political violence, and no changes in expectations of firearm use in situations where respondents considered political violence justifiable. Changes on other measures were infrequent (17 of 58 comparisons in the main analysis) and small where they occurred (with 2 exceptions, change < 0.05).
Conclusions
Contrary to expectation, support for and willingness to participate in political violence in this cohort showed little to no change from 2023 to 2024, an election year in the USA. These findings can help guide prevention efforts.
Q2

Impact of driver licensing renewal policies on older driver crash involvement and injury rates in 13 states, 2000–2019
Hamann C.J., Davis J.A., Pae G., Zhu M., Shill G.H., Tefft B., Cavanaugh J.E.
Abstract
Background
Motor vehicle crashes are the second leading cause of injury death among adults aged 65 and older in the U.S., second only to falls. A common state-level approach to mitigating older adult crash risk is the implementation of driver license renewal policies which vary largely between states and data on their effectiveness in preventing crashes and injuries are limited. To fill this gap, the aim of this study is to examine the association between state driver license renewal policies and older driver crash and injury rates.
Methods
Historical crash data, license renewal policy data, and other relevant policy and demographic data were gathered from 13 U.S. states (CO, IL, IA, KS, MN, MO, NE, ND, OH, SD, UT, WI, WY) for years 2000 through 2019, inclusive. Main exposures included six license renewal policies: renewal period, in-person renewal frequency, vision testing, knowledge testing, on-road drive testing, and mandatory physician reporting. The primary outcomes were crash and injury rates per 100,000 population.
Results
The study population included 19,010,179 crash-involved drivers aged 40 and older. State policies became less restrictive in many states over the study period, even for drivers aged 75 and older, resulting in longer times between renewals and fewer in-person renewal requirements. Loosening of in-person renewal from every time to less than every time was associated with increased crash rates, among drivers aged 65 to 74 (RRcrash = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.01–1.16). A longer duration between in-person renewals was associated with increased injury rates among drivers 75 and older (RRinjury = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.00–1.39).
Conclusions
Generally, state policies became less restrictive and resulted in longer required intervals between license renewal. Loosening of driver license renewal policies was associated with increased crash and injury rates. However, safety benefits of restrictive older driver licensing policies should be carefully weighed against costs to older adult well-being and quality of life following licensure loss. Additional methods to assess fitness to drive are necessary to identify the mechanisms behind the increased rates.
Top-100
Citing journals
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
|
Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids
1128 citations, 9.86%
|
|
Journal of the American Ceramic Society
657 citations, 5.74%
|
|
Ceramics International
604 citations, 5.28%
|
|
International Journal of Applied Glass Science
563 citations, 4.92%
|
|
Materials
220 citations, 1.92%
|
|
Journal of Nuclear Materials
169 citations, 1.48%
|
|
npj Materials Degradation
168 citations, 1.47%
|
|
Journal of the European Ceramic Society
126 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Journal of Alloys and Compounds
119 citations, 1.04%
|
|
Optical Materials
117 citations, 1.02%
|
|
Optical Materials Express
111 citations, 0.97%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Physics
102 citations, 0.89%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry C
101 citations, 0.88%
|
|
Frontiers in Materials
98 citations, 0.86%
|
|
Scientific Reports
90 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids: X
86 citations, 0.75%
|
|
Optics Express
85 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Journal of Luminescence
68 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Progress in Materials Science
67 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Acta Materialia
66 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry B
66 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Journal of Materials Science
58 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics
58 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Materials Chemistry and Physics
57 citations, 0.5%
|
|
RSC Advances
49 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
47 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Journal of Applied Physics
46 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Materials Science and Engineering C
44 citations, 0.38%
|
|
ACS applied materials & interfaces
43 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Applied Surface Science
43 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Journal of Materials Chemistry C
41 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Applied Optics
41 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Materials Letters
39 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Entropy
39 citations, 0.34%
|
|
MRS Advances
38 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing
37 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
35 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
34 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
34 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Applied Physics Letters
33 citations, 0.29%
|
|
International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology
33 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Optics Letters
32 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
31 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan
30 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
30 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Optics and Laser Technology
29 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Nanomaterials
29 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Coatings
29 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Solid State Chemistry
28 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Lightwave Technology
28 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Materials Today: Proceedings
27 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Procedia Materials Science
27 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology
26 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Acta Biomaterialia
26 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Springer Handbooks
26 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Optical and Quantum Electronics
26 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Hazardous Materials
26 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Optical Materials: X
25 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Materials Chemistry A
25 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Applied Geochemistry
25 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society
25 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
24 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Silicon
24 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Materials and Design
24 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Crystals
24 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Chemical Engineering Journal
24 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Advanced Optical Materials
23 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Nature Communications
23 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Physical Review Materials
23 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Materials Chemistry B
23 citations, 0.2%
|
|
International Materials Reviews
23 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Materials Today Communications
23 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Inorganic Chemistry
23 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies
22 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Physical Review B
22 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Biomedical Materials (Bristol)
21 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Chemical Reviews
21 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
21 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Sensors
21 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of the Optical Society of America B: Optical Physics
21 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Micromachines
20 citations, 0.17%
|
|
ACS Applied Nano Materials
20 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry
20 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Physica Status Solidi (B): Basic Research
20 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A
20 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Optik
20 citations, 0.17%
|
|
ACS Omega
20 citations, 0.17%
|
|
MRS Bulletin
20 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Chemical Geology
20 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
20 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Advanced Materials
20 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
19 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Open Ceramics
19 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Thermochimica Acta
18 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Construction and Building Materials
18 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids
18 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Computational Materials Science
17 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Physics Condensed Matter
17 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Chemistry of Materials
17 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Structure
17 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
|
|
Elsevier
4647 citations, 40.61%
|
|
Wiley
1838 citations, 16.06%
|
|
Springer Nature
1181 citations, 10.32%
|
|
MDPI
643 citations, 5.62%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
504 citations, 4.4%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
325 citations, 2.84%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
302 citations, 2.64%
|
|
AIP Publishing
244 citations, 2.13%
|
|
IOP Publishing
185 citations, 1.62%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
159 citations, 1.39%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
139 citations, 1.21%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
138 citations, 1.21%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
80 citations, 0.7%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
62 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
52 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
46 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
39 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Ceramic Society of Japan
30 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
29 citations, 0.25%
|
|
SAGE
28 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Mineralogical Society of America
21 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Oxford University Press
18 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
15 citations, 0.13%
|
|
EDP Sciences
14 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
14 citations, 0.12%
|
|
IntechOpen
14 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Chinese Society of Rare Earths
12 citations, 0.1%
|
|
World Scientific
11 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Korean Ceramic Society
11 citations, 0.1%
|
|
The Electrochemical Society
11 citations, 0.1%
|
|
ASME International
11 citations, 0.1%
|
|
10 citations, 0.09%
|
|
The Royal Society
9 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Japan Society of Applied Physics
9 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Acta Physica Sinica, Chinese Physical Society and Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
9 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Sociedad Espanola de Ceramica y Vidrio
9 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Tsinghua University Press
8 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
7 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Wuhan University of Technology
7 citations, 0.06%
|
|
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)
7 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Iron and Steel Institute of Japan
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Science in China Press
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
The Korean Fiber Society
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Laser Institute of America
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Annual Reviews
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Physical Society of Japan
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Japan Institute of Metals
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Vacuum Society
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Mineralogical Society
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Electrochemical Society of Japan
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Scientific Publishers
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
ASM International
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Korean Institute of Metals and Materials
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Mathematical Sciences Publishers
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Kazan Federal University
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Optical Society of India
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Shanghai Institute of Ceramics
3 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Emerald
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
NACE International
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Chinese Ceramic Society
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Associacao Profissional de Conservadores, Restauradores de Portugal
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ain Shams University
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk Journal
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
SciELO
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
OAE Publishing Inc.
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Publishing House Belorusskaya Nauka
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Japan Society of Colour Material
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IGG UB RAS
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IGI Global
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Universitas Gadjah Mada
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Editora Edgard Blucher, Ltda.
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Sakarya University Journal of Science
2 citations, 0.02%
|
|
King Saud University
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Higher Education Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Ural Federal University
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Ivanovo State University of Chemistry and Technology
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Allen Press
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Korean Academy of Periodontology
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry
1 citation, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
|
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
29 publications, 3.78%
|
|
Friedrich Schiller University Jena
26 publications, 3.39%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
19 publications, 2.47%
|
|
Clemson University
17 publications, 2.21%
|
|
Institute of Ceramics and Glass
17 publications, 2.21%
|
|
Wuhan University of Technology
16 publications, 2.08%
|
|
University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague
14 publications, 1.82%
|
|
Federal University of São Carlos
13 publications, 1.69%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
11 publications, 1.43%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
11 publications, 1.43%
|
|
University of Rostock
11 publications, 1.43%
|
|
Aalborg University
10 publications, 1.3%
|
|
University of Central Florida
10 publications, 1.3%
|
|
Central Glass and Ceramic Research Institute
9 publications, 1.17%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Turin
9 publications, 1.17%
|
|
Nagaoka University of Technology
9 publications, 1.17%
|
|
Imperial College London
8 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
8 publications, 1.04%
|
|
University of Nottingham
7 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Pohang University of Science and Technology
7 publications, 0.91%
|
|
National Institute of Standards and Technology
7 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Missouri University of Science and Technology
7 publications, 0.91%
|
|
RWTH Aachen University
7 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
7 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Istanbul Technical University
6 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
6 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Åbo Akademi University
6 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University of Padua
6 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
6 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
6 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
6 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Lanzhou University
6 publications, 0.78%
|
|
National Hellenic Research Foundation
6 publications, 0.78%
|
|
University of the Basque Country
6 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Vavilov State Optical Institute
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Bordeaux
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Sorbonne University
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Manchester
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Iowa State University
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Argonne National Laboratory
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Ohio State University
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Kyoto University
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Clausthal University of Technology
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Kyushu University
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Sheffield Hallam University
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of North Texas
5 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Southwest University of Science and Technology
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Yanshan University
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Aston University
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
National Institute for Materials Science
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Qilu University of Technology
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
National Interuniversity Consortium of Materials Science and Technology
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Adelaide
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of California, Davis
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Kongju National University
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Nippon Electric Company
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Sheffield
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Valencia
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Reading
4 publications, 0.52%
|
|
ITMO University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Saint Petersburg State University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Indian Institute of Science
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Yildiz Technical University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Mandi
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
South China University of Technology
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Lisbon
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Tampere University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Central South University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Linnaeus University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
East China University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Shenzhen University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Hefei University of Technology
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Trento
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Washington State University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Arizona State University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Arizona
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Federal Institute For Materials Research and Testing
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Purdue University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Leeds
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Tokyo
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Shiga Prefecture
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
AGH University of Krakow
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Florida
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of Cincinnati
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Menoufia University
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Université de Lille
3 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
I. V. Grebenshchikov Institute of Silicate Chemistry of NRC «Kurchatov Institute»
2 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
|
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
11 publications, 4.44%
|
|
University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague
10 publications, 4.03%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
10 publications, 4.03%
|
|
Institute of Ceramics and Glass
10 publications, 4.03%
|
|
Friedrich Schiller University Jena
9 publications, 3.63%
|
|
Wuhan University of Technology
6 publications, 2.42%
|
|
University of Padua
6 publications, 2.42%
|
|
RWTH Aachen University
5 publications, 2.02%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
5 publications, 2.02%
|
|
Nagaoka University of Technology
4 publications, 1.61%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
4 publications, 1.61%
|
|
Istanbul Technical University
3 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Southwest University of Science and Technology
3 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Aalborg University
3 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Qilu University of Technology
3 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Clemson University
3 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Federal University of São Carlos
3 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Lanzhou University
3 publications, 1.21%
|
|
National Hellenic Research Foundation
3 publications, 1.21%
|
|
University of the Basque Country
3 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
3 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Sheffield Hallam University
3 publications, 1.21%
|
|
I. V. Grebenshchikov Institute of Silicate Chemistry of NRC «Kurchatov Institute»
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Yildiz Technical University
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Central Glass and Ceramic Research Institute
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Donostia International Physics Center
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Lisbon
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Central South University
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Linnaeus University
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Yanshan University
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
East China University of Science and Technology
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Turin
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Åbo Akademi University
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Nottingham
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Tokyo University of Science
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Gdańsk University of Technology
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Washington State University
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
National Institute of Standards and Technology
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Ohio State University
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Arizona
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Central Florida
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Rostock
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Nippon Electric Company
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
AGH University of Krakow
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Lehigh University
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of North Texas
2 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Institute of Solid State Chemistry and Mechanochemistry of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Institute of High Temperature Electrochemistry of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
ITMO University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Saint Petersburg State University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Vyatka State University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Belarusian State Technological University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Vavilov State Optical Institute
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Zavaritsky Institute of Geology and Geochemistry of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Taif University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Sharif University of Technology
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
University of Delhi
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Istanbul University Cerrahpasa
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Mandi
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Homi Bhabha National Institute
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Delhi Technological University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Warangal
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Cochin University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
TÜBİTAK Marmara Research Center
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Kafkas University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Banasthali Vidyapith
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Cumhuriyet University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Beijing Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Harbin Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
ALBA Synchrotron
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Harbin Engineering University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Basque Foundation for Science
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Centro de Física de Materiales
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Eskisehir Technical University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
University of Lorraine
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
University of Bordeaux
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
University of Bayreuth
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Tampere University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Indian Space Research Organisation
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Southeast University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Jiangsu Normal University
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
USA
|
USA, 245, 31.9%
USA
245 publications, 31.9%
|
China
|
China, 100, 13.02%
China
100 publications, 13.02%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 84, 10.94%
Germany
84 publications, 10.94%
|
France
|
France, 64, 8.33%
France
64 publications, 8.33%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 50, 6.51%
United Kingdom
50 publications, 6.51%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 49, 6.38%
Japan
49 publications, 6.38%
|
India
|
India, 39, 5.08%
India
39 publications, 5.08%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 32, 4.17%
Spain
32 publications, 4.17%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 32, 4.17%
Italy
32 publications, 4.17%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 27, 3.52%
Brazil
27 publications, 3.52%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 21, 2.73%
Slovakia
21 publications, 2.73%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 19, 2.47%
Russia
19 publications, 2.47%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 18, 2.34%
Czech Republic
18 publications, 2.34%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 17, 2.21%
Portugal
17 publications, 2.21%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 16, 2.08%
Turkey
16 publications, 2.08%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 13, 1.69%
Denmark
13 publications, 1.69%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 13, 1.69%
Republic of Korea
13 publications, 1.69%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 12, 1.56%
Poland
12 publications, 1.56%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 9, 1.17%
Australia
9 publications, 1.17%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 9, 1.17%
Bulgaria
9 publications, 1.17%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 9, 1.17%
Egypt
9 publications, 1.17%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 9, 1.17%
Finland
9 publications, 1.17%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 7, 0.91%
Switzerland
7 publications, 0.91%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 6, 0.78%
Ukraine
6 publications, 0.78%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 6, 0.78%
Greece
6 publications, 0.78%
|
Liechtenstein
|
Liechtenstein, 6, 0.78%
Liechtenstein
6 publications, 0.78%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 5, 0.65%
Algeria
5 publications, 0.65%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 5, 0.65%
Iran
5 publications, 0.65%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 5, 0.65%
Netherlands
5 publications, 0.65%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 4, 0.52%
Belgium
4 publications, 0.52%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 4, 0.52%
Sweden
4 publications, 0.52%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 3, 0.39%
Canada
3 publications, 0.39%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 3, 0.39%
Mexico
3 publications, 0.39%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 3, 0.39%
Saudi Arabia
3 publications, 0.39%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 2, 0.26%
Vietnam
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 2, 0.26%
Serbia
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 2, 0.26%
Tunisia
2 publications, 0.26%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 1, 0.13%
Belarus
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 0.13%
Austria
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.13%
Argentina
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.13%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.13%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.13%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.13%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 0.13%
Oman
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Palestine
|
Palestine, 1, 0.13%
Palestine
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.13%
Romania
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.13%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.13%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.13%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.13%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.13%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.13%
|
Show all (21 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
|
USA
|
USA, 80, 32.26%
USA
80 publications, 32.26%
|
China
|
China, 45, 18.15%
China
45 publications, 18.15%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 28, 11.29%
Germany
28 publications, 11.29%
|
France
|
France, 27, 10.89%
France
27 publications, 10.89%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 19, 7.66%
Slovakia
19 publications, 7.66%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 18, 7.26%
Japan
18 publications, 7.26%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 14, 5.65%
Spain
14 publications, 5.65%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 13, 5.24%
Italy
13 publications, 5.24%
|
India
|
India, 11, 4.44%
India
11 publications, 4.44%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 11, 4.44%
Czech Republic
11 publications, 4.44%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 10, 4.03%
United Kingdom
10 publications, 4.03%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 8, 3.23%
Turkey
8 publications, 3.23%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 7, 2.82%
Russia
7 publications, 2.82%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 7, 2.82%
Brazil
7 publications, 2.82%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 6, 2.42%
Poland
6 publications, 2.42%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 5, 2.02%
Portugal
5 publications, 2.02%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 4, 1.61%
Denmark
4 publications, 1.61%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 4, 1.61%
Egypt
4 publications, 1.61%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 4, 1.61%
Netherlands
4 publications, 1.61%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 3, 1.21%
Bulgaria
3 publications, 1.21%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 3, 1.21%
Greece
3 publications, 1.21%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 3, 1.21%
Finland
3 publications, 1.21%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 2, 0.81%
Republic of Korea
2 publications, 0.81%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 2, 0.81%
Saudi Arabia
2 publications, 0.81%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 2, 0.81%
Switzerland
2 publications, 0.81%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 2, 0.81%
Sweden
2 publications, 0.81%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 1, 0.4%
Belarus
1 publication, 0.4%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 1, 0.4%
Australia
1 publication, 0.4%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 1, 0.4%
Algeria
1 publication, 0.4%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.4%
Argentina
1 publication, 0.4%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.4%
Belgium
1 publication, 0.4%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.4%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.4%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.4%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.4%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 1, 0.4%
Iran
1 publication, 0.4%
|
Liechtenstein
|
Liechtenstein, 1, 0.4%
Liechtenstein
1 publication, 0.4%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 1, 0.4%
Morocco
1 publication, 0.4%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.4%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.4%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 0.4%
Oman
1 publication, 0.4%
|
Palestine
|
Palestine, 1, 0.4%
Palestine
1 publication, 0.4%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.4%
Romania
1 publication, 0.4%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.4%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.4%
|
Show all (11 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
1 profile journal article
Trigub Alexander
PhD in Physics and Mathematics

National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute"
175 publications,
1 946 citations
h-index: 26
Research interests
X-ray absorption spectroscopy
1 profile journal article
Gutnikov Sergey
🥼 🤝
PhD in Chemistry

Lomonosov Moscow State University
25 publications,
602 citations
h-index: 14
Research interests
Materials science
1 profile journal article
SCHULLER Sophie
44 publications,
1 255 citations
h-index: 16