Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q3
WOS
Q4
Impact factor
1.4
SJR
0.337
CiteScore
2.8
Categories
Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)
Areas
Physics and Astronomy
Years of issue
2011-2025
journal names
AIP Advances
AIP ADV
Top-3 citing journals

AIP Advances
(5285 citations)

Journal of Applied Physics
(2944 citations)

Applied Physics Letters
(2748 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
(295 publications)

Tohoku University
(273 publications)

Xi'an Jiaotong University
(261 publications)

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
(150 publications)

Tohoku University
(115 publications)

Xi'an Jiaotong University
(111 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 395
Q3

Qualitative and quantitative assessment of solite RE black and HyFlex remover systems for endodontic retreatment - An in vitro nano-computed tomography analysis
Valan A.S., Solete P., Antony S.D., Ramamoorthi S., Alasqah M., Arunachalam V.
Abstract
Introduction:
The successful outcome of endodontic retreatment heavily relies on the thorough removal of root canal filling materials. This study aimed to quantitatively and qualitatively assess the efficacy of various retreatment file systems using nano-computed tomography (nano-CT) imaging.
Materials and Methods:
Thirty recently extracted human mandibular molars with mesial roots having curvatures <20° were chosen and sectioned to 16 mm in length. The root canals were prepared with the ProTaper Gold system up to size F2 and they were filled with gutta percha and AH Plus sealer. After obturation, all the samples were randomly assigned to two groups (n = 15 each) for retreatment: Group 1 utilized Solite RE Black retreatment files, while Group 2 employed Coltene HyFlex Remover files. Nano-CT imaging was employed to measure pre- and postoperative volumes of remaining filling material and remaining dentin thickness and the time taken for retreatment was measured in seconds. The obtained values were analyzed statistically (P < 0.05).
Results:
Nano-CT analysis showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) in the volume of remaining filling material between the Solite RE Black and Coltene HyFlex Remover groups. However, no significant difference was observed in the time required for gutta-percha removal. The Solite RE Black system showed comparatively less dentin removal than the Coltene HyFlex Remover system (P < 0.05).
Conclusion:
The Solite RE Black retreatment file system demonstrated promising efficacy in removing filling material while preserving dentin integrity compared to the Coltene HyFlex Remover system. These findings support its potential as an effective tool for endodontic retreatment, emphasizing the need for further clinical trials to validate its performance across various clinical scenarios.
Q3

Evaluating generative pretraining transformer reliability in addressing dental trauma: A cross-sectional observational study on avulsion and intrusion
Bordin R.W., Bartnack C.C., Westphalen V.P., Gasparello G.G., Bark M.J., Gava T.N., Tanaka O.M.
Abstract
Introduction:
The advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized digital communication, enhancing interactions between humans and computers. This study explores the application of Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer 3.5 (ChatGPT-3.5), in providing accurate information on dental trauma.
Materials and Methods:
Utilizing a dataset of 45 self-generated questions across three topics, general dental trauma, avulsion, and intrusion, ChatGPT-3.5 generated responses that were subsequently evaluated by five endodontic experts, each with over a decade of experience. The evaluators used a Likert scale to assess the quality of the AI-generated answers, synthesizing reliable scientific evidence and clinical expertise to ensure a thorough analysis. The data obtained from the evaluators’ scores were organized and analyzed using Microsoft Excel software and the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 25. For each question, descriptive statistics including the median and interquartile range were computed.
Results:
The study found that ChatGPT provided reliable information across the three assessed dental topics. Avulsion was rated the highest (4.40 ± 0.717), significantly outperforming general dental trauma (3.97 ± 0.885) (P = 0.005). Intrusion received a rating of 4.13 ± 0.794, showing no significant difference compared to the other topics. Most evaluator scores fell into the “Good” (44.0%) and “Very Good” (38.7%) categories. This indicates a generally positive appraisal of ChatGPT’s performance, with a fair agreement among evaluators, evidenced by a combined Fleiss’s kappa coefficient of 0.324. However, there was variability, particularly with Evaluator 4’s scores differing significantly from those of evaluators 1 and 2.
Conclusions:
ChatGPT’s responses on general dental trauma, avulsion, and intrusion were generally rated positively, with avulsion responses deemed the most reliable. The study underscores the need for continuous evaluation to maintain the accuracy, reliability, and safety of AI-generated content in endodontics, suggesting AI should serve as a supplementary tool rather than a primary information source.
Q3

Agreement between students’ self/peer and faculty assessments of the radiographic technical quality of root canal treatment performed during preclinical and clinical endodontic courses
Awooda E.M., Elzaki W.M., Al-Nazhan S.A.
Abstract
Introduction:
This study investigated the agreement between students’ self-assessment or peer assessment and faculty assessment of the quality of root canal treatment (RCT) performed during preclinical and clinical endodontic courses.
Materials and Methods:
This cross-sectional study enrolled 23 4th-year students and a faculty member from the University of Medical Sciences and Technology, Sudan. The radiographic technical quality of RCTs performed during preclinical and clinical endodontic courses was evaluated by the students themselves, their peers, and faculty members in terms of the obturation length, shape, and density. Paired Student’s t-test was used to compare self-peer and faculty assessments. P < 0.05 was considered indicative of statistical significance.
Results:
No statistically significant differences were observed among the three assessment groups in terms of the quality of RCTs performed during the preclinical course. However, statistically significant differences were observed between self- and peer assessments (P = 0.014), and between self- and faculty assessments (P = 0.005), which may be attributable to lower confidence among students when working on real patients, leading to lower self-assessment scores.
Conclusion:
Significant differences were observed between self- and peer assessments and faculty assessments in the quality of RCT performed during the clinical course, with students underrating their performance. Formative assessment of learning rather than summative assessment, during endodontic courses, is recommended at the end of academic year.
Q3

Persistent pain in maxillary premolars following root canal treatment with apical transportation: A report of two cases without periapical pathology
Ong T.K.
Abstract
Persistent pain after endodontic treatment is often associated with evidence of periapical pathology. Nonetheless, this case report presents two instances of persistent pain in maxillary premolars post root canal treatment (RCT), without evident periapical radiolucency on imaging. A 35-year-old Asian female experienced dull, aching pain on biting in tooth #25, whereas a 40-year-old Caucasian female reported similar symptoms in tooth #15. Both teeth showed tenderness to percussion but not palpation. Periapical radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans revealed completed RCT with apical transportation but no detectable periapical pathology. Thus, both teeth were diagnosed as previously treated with symptomatic apical periodontitis. Non-surgical retreatment successfully addressed untreated canal spaces, resolving symptoms. This report suggested persistent pain following RCT might stem from endodontic reasons, even in the absence of visible apical pathology on CBCT scans, highlighting the importance of thorough canal debridement to resolve symptoms associated with untreated canal spaces in apical transportation. Furthermore, this case report demonstrates that clinicians should make a diagnosis through thorough dental history and other clinical investigations, without relying solely on CBCT for the diagnosis of posttreatment endodontic pain.
Q3

Tampon approach in vital pulp therapy: Advancing endodontic care for permanent dentition
Asgary S.
Q3
Saudi Endodontic Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
Q3

Comprehensive management of complex resorptive lesions: Report of two cases
Ray A.B., Mayya A., Ghosh S., Rai N., Acharya S.R., Chatra A., Shettigar L.S.
Abstract
In the field of endodontics, the management of complex resorptive lesions demands innovative and precise interventions. This report delineates the comprehensive management of two distinct cases, each presenting unique challenges. The first case involved a 23-year-old male with hypothyroidism, presenting with pain and external cervical resorption with internal communication in his lower left front tooth. The case was diagnosed with pulp necrosis and asymptomatic apical periodontitis. The second case involved a 26-year-old female in good health, dissatisfied with the cosmetic appearance, and experiencing occasional pain from a previously treated upper front tooth with concurrent external apical and internal resorption. It was diagnosed as previously treated, with symptomatic apical periodontitis. These cases were notable for their complexity and the tailored approach to diagnosis and treatment, employing advanced techniques and materials, such as bioceramic materials, for optimal outcomes. The first case was approached through conventional endodontic disinfection, flap reflection, and the meticulous external management of the resorptive defect with bioceramic material, followed by restorative procedures. The second case required retreatment, including wide canal management, apex negotiation, and the establishment of an apical plug with bioceramic material, culminating in backfilling with thermoplasticized gutta-percha and subsequent prosthetic rehabilitation. Remarkably, both cases demonstrated successful healing and patient satisfaction at a 6-month follow-up, with radiographs and photographs evidencing the desired clinical outcomes. This report highlights the necessity of adaptability, precision, and the integration of innovative materials and techniques in endodontic practice to effectively address complex resorptive lesions. It underscores the significance of a comprehensive diagnostic and treatment framework that can guide clinical decision-making and enhance procedural outcomes in similar challenging scenarios. It contributes valuable insights and reinforces the imperative of detailed management in endodontic complexities.
Q3

A narrative review on applications of nanotechnology in modern endodontics
Javed M.Q., Ali A.
Abstract
Nanotechnology in modern endodontics involves manipulating materials at the nanoscale to improve dental treatments, disinfection, imaging, and tissue engineering. This narrative review aims to evaluate the impact and applications of nanotechnology in modern endodontics, focusing on advancements in materials, disinfection processes, imaging techniques, and tissue engineering while addressing associated challenges and safety concerns. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in March 2024 across PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, COCHRANE Library, and Science Direct databases using MeSH terms/keywords such as “Nanotechnology,” “Endodontics,” “Disinfection,” and “Dental Tissue Engineering.” Articles published from March 2010 to March 2024 were considered, with inclusion criteria focusing on studies relevant to the objectives. From an initial pool of 774 articles, 86 were selected based on titles and abstracts, and 45 were shortlisted after full-text evaluation. The review highlights significant advancements in nanotechnology in endodontic materials, disinfection methods, imaging techniques, and tissue engineering. Nanomaterials have improved the efficiency, precision, and biocompatibility of dental treatments. However, challenges such as long-term biocompatibility, standardization of applications, and patient safety remain to be addressed. Continuous research, ethical practices, and regulatory oversight are crucial for integrating nanotechnology into endodontics. While nanotechnology offers promising advancements in endodontics, ongoing research and collaboration among researchers, clinicians, and regulatory bodies are essential to harness its full potential and ensure patient safety. Limitations of this review include potential biases in article selection and the evolving nature of nanotechnology research.
Q3

News
Q3
Saudi Endodontic Journal
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,

Open Access
Q3

Evaluating the effectiveness of cone-beam computed tomography reverse contrast images in the diagnosis of vertical root fractures: An in vitro pilot study
Mortazavi S., Hasanpour S., Anbiaee N., Rouhani A., Naghavi N., Babazadeh S., Shiezadeh I.
Abstract
Introduction:
The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) reverse contrast images in the diagnosis of vertical root fractures (VRFs).
Materials and Methods:
In this study, 20 single-canal premolar teeth without cracks and internal resorption were selected and after root canal treatment, divided into two: experimental and control groups. In each of the teeth in the experimental group, an artificial fracture was created with the SANTAM device, then the teeth of both groups were randomly placed in the dental sockets of a dry mandible, and after preparing CBCT images of the teeth, the images were processed by reverse contrast software. Initial and reverse contrast images were examined by two radiologists and two endodontists. The data were analyzed by SPSS software version 22.
Results:
Observers reported higher sensitivity and positive and negative predictive value in normal contrast images than in reverse contrast images, but the specificity reported by endodontists in reverse contrast images was slightly higher than in normal contrast images. In comparing the results of radiologists and endodontists, there was a significant agreement in the review of the initial images (κ =0/59), but there was no significant agreement in the images with reverse contrast (κ = −0/1). There was not any notable distinction observed in the assessment of normal and reverse contrast images among the observers, nor in the comparison between radiologists and endodontists, except for the examination of normal contrast images by the two groups of radiologists and endodontists (P = 0.00). From this, it can be inferred that the diagnostic power of reverse contrast images in identifying VRFs is inferior to that of normal contrast images (P > 0.05).
Conclusion:
According to the obtained results, it was concluded that reverse contrast CBCT images are not effective in diagnosing VRFs and cause error in diagnosis.
Q3

Antibacterial activity and smear layer removal efficiency of silver nanoparticles as a final irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis using confocal laser scanning microscopy and scanning electron microscopy
Chandran N., Ramesh S.
Abstract
Introduction:
Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have garnered significant attention for their potent antibacterial properties, making them promising candidates for use as root canal irrigants in endodontics. The persistent presence of Enterococcus faecalis in treated root canals often leads to endodontic failures. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of neem-synthesized AgNPs, chemically synthesized AgNPs, sodium hypochlorite (2.25%), and saline solution in reducing viable bacteria and removing smear layers in E. faecalis-infected mandibular premolar teeth.
Materials and Methods:
After decoronation, mandibular premolar, single-rooted, teeth (120) were instrumented until ProTaper Gold F3. In all samples, inoculation of E. faecalis was done and divided into four groups depending on the irrigating solution used into Group A: neem-synthesized AgNPs, Group B: chemically synthesized AgNPs, Group C: sodium hypochlorite (2.25%), and Group D: saline solution. After irrigation, roots were divided longitudinally and analyzed for confocal laser scanning microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Data were statistically analyzed using Tukey’s honestly significant difference test.
Results:
The minimum reduction in live bacteria percentage was seen in Group C rather than Groups A and B; although there was no significant difference between them. Group D showed the maximum percentage of live bacteria and a greatest score of smear layer compared to other groups. In contrast to Group B, Group A scored higher, although the results were nonsignificant. Group C showed the least score of smear layer presence. The P value between the experimental groups was found to be <0.05, indicating statistical significance.
Conclusion:
Both neem-synthesized AgNp and sodium hypochlorite irrigants reduced the proportion of viable bacteria most significantly. This work demonstrates the possibility of employing nanoparticles as an irrigant that can effectively remove smear layers while also acting as an antimicrobial.
Q3

Endodontic management of mandibular permanent canine with two roots and two root canals using cone-beam computed tomography
Alfahadi H.R., Alyami Y.A., Alkazman F.H., Al Fadhil M.H., Alyami S.A., Alyami A.M., Alsalem M.F.
Abstract
A thorough understanding of the root canal systems of various human teeth can facilitate successful root canal treatment. The mandibular canines typically have one root and one canal. Mandibular canines with two roots are uncommon. This case report describes the examination of occlusion erosion and deep caries that had reached the pulp chamber in the mandibular canine of a 56-year-old healthy Saudi female patient referred to the endodontic clinic for evaluating the left mandibular canine. Radiographic evaluation revealed a widening of the periodontal ligament and periapical radiolucency and the presence of two roots. Two roots with two root canals were observed on cone-beam computed tomography. The tooth responded to a sensitivity test and was tender upon percussion and palpation. Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis and symptomatic apical periodontitis diagnosis were established, and nonsurgical root canal treatment was performed using a dental operating microscope. At follow-up, the patient’s symptoms had completely disappeared.
Q3

Use of bioactive glass in combination with or without calcium hydroxide changes the biological and mechanical properties of dentin: An in vitro study
Salkoska Yildizbas A., Uysal B.A., Kucuk Keles O., Belli S.
Abstract
Introduction:
Calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) is the most commonly used medicament in endodontics. This study aimed to investigate the effect of bioactive glass (BG) use with or without Ca(OH)2 on the biological and mechanical properties of dentin.
Materials and Methods:
Standard holes were created to simulate root canals on 84 dentin slices. Four groups were formed according to the medicament placed in the root canals: Ca(OH)2; Ca(OH)2 + 7% BG; BG and control. Scanning electron microscopy analysis to evaluate the dentin surfaces exposed to the test medicaments and energy dispersive X-ray analysis to observe apatite formation were used on the 1st, 7th, and 14th days. X-ray diffraction measurements were performed to investigate mineral phase formation. Microhardness and pH measurements were also carried out. Data were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (P < 0.05).
Results:
The Ca(OH)2 and control groups showed the highest Ca and P mineral content on the 14th day, whereas the lowest Ca and P content was found in the Ca(OH)2 + BG group (P < 0.05). A gradual decrease in crystal formation was found in the Ca(OH)2 + BG group from the 1st day to the 14th day. The highest microhardness measurements were also recorded in the Ca(OH)2 + BG group (P < 0.05). The Ca(OH)2 + BG group showed the highest pH measurements (P = 0.001).
Conclusions:
Ca(OH)2 + BG can be an alternative intracanal medicament. Further studies should be performed to determine the clinical implications of this combination.
Q3

Comparative evaluation of smear layer removal and dentin wettability using 1% phytic acid with and without 0.2% chitosan nanoparticles: An in vitro study
Halkai R., Halkai K.R., Mahveen S.U.
Abstract
Introduction:
The success of endodontic treatment depends on the complete removal of the smear layer from the root canal and the enhanced wettability of the irrigants employed during treatment. However, none of the irrigants efficiently accomplish this; thus, the purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the elimination of the smear layer and wettability of root dentin using the combination of 0.2% Chitosan nanoparticles(CSN) with 1% phytic acid (PA).
Materials and Methods:
About 100 extracted single-rooted human premolar teeth were decoronated and standardized to 13 mm root length. Fifty specimens were tested for smear layer removal and another half for wettability (n = 50) after final irrigation in five groups: Group 1 – normal saline (control), Group 2 – 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Group 3 – 17% EDTA with 0.2% CSN, Group 4 – 1% PA, and Group 5 – 1% PA with 0.2% CSN. After root canal instrumentation and final irrigation, the specimens were observed under scanning electron microscope for the smear layer. Wettability was determined using dentin blocks obtained (n = 50) by resecting the apical third of each specimen, treated with irrigants in aforementioned groups, and the contact angle was measured using a goniometer. Statistical analysis was done using one-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey tests (P < 0.05).
Results:
A combination of 1% PA with 0.2% CSN showed higher smear layer removal and increased wettability.
Conclusions:
The incorporation of 0.2% CSN to 1% PA was effective in removing the smear layer and increased the dentinal wettability.
Q3

A cross-sectional study on awareness regarding management of dental trauma among clinical dental students and interns
Ikhile F.O., Enabulele J.E.
Abstract
Introduction:
Dental trauma could lead to separation or crushing of the dental supporting tissues and esthetic and functional disorders. This study aims to evaluate the knowledge regarding the management of dental trauma among clinical dental students and interns in Benin City, Nigeria.
Materials and Methods:
This descriptive cross-sectional study utilized a self-administered questionnaire containing 15 closed and open-ended questions to garner data focused on sociodemograhic characteristics and awareness of the management of traumatic dental injury, from respondents. Data from 95 respondents were statistically analyzed and both univariate and bivariate analyses were used in this study.
Results:
A significant proportion; 77 (81.1%) had a poor overall knowledge of management, although most respondents had knowledge of some of the steps involved in emergency management of dental trauma. The association between respondents’ level of education and their knowledge of the management of dental trauma was found to be statistically significant (P = 0.0001). Respondents at higher level in their dental training were found to have better overall knowledge compared to those at lower levels.
Conclusion:
The knowledge regarding the management of dental trauma among the respondents was poor. This was associated with the level of study and clinical exposure.
Q3
Navigating endodontic outcomes through cone-beam computed tomography: A narrative review
Zahran S.S., Mirdad L.H.
Abstract
Periapical radiographs (PRs) have been the most reliable modality for assessing periapical health. Later, the evolution of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) revolutionized three-dimensional maxillofacial skeletal imaging. CBCT imaging has emerged as a superior diagnostic tool compared to PR. The aim of this narrative review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the outcomes related to the use of CBCT in evaluating various endodontic treatments, including primary root canal treatments, secondary treatments, endodontic microsurgeries, and vital pulp therapies and the associated prognostic factors. The research selection process involved systematically searching PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for literature on CBCT and endodontics. Criteria included English-language; peer-reviewed articles published from January 2010 to December 2023, reporting 1-year outcomes of various endodontic treatments using CBCT. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. A total of 18 outcome study articles utilizing CBCT to evaluate primary root canal treatment were selected, as well as 7 for secondary root canal retreatment, 3 for vital pulp therapy, and 11 articles pertaining to endodontic microsurgery. The outcomes revealed varying success rates and prognostic factors. Consistent with outcome research employing PRs, studies that utilized CBCT also exhibited substantial variability in factors affecting initial and secondary treatment outcomes. The rate of favorable outcomes was significantly lower when assessed with CBCT compared to PR. The results from utilizing CBCT for primary and secondary root canal treatments, endodontic microsurgeries, and vital pulp therapies demonstrate diverse success rates and prognostic factors in comparison to outcomes based solely on PRs.
Top-100
Citing journals
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
|
|
AIP Advances
5285 citations, 3.83%
|
|
Journal of Applied Physics
2944 citations, 2.13%
|
|
Applied Physics Letters
2748 citations, 1.99%
|
|
Physical Review B
2514 citations, 1.82%
|
|
Scientific Reports
2233 citations, 1.62%
|
|
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
1893 citations, 1.37%
|
|
Journal of Alloys and Compounds
1749 citations, 1.27%
|
|
Journal Physics D: Applied Physics
1522 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics
1140 citations, 0.83%
|
|
ACS applied materials & interfaces
1092 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Materials
1083 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Nanomaterials
1081 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Physics of Fluids
1079 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Ceramics International
1029 citations, 0.75%
|
|
Optics Express
1018 citations, 0.74%
|
|
Applied Surface Science
968 citations, 0.7%
|
|
Physical Review Applied
904 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Part 1: Regular Papers & Short Notes
891 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Physica Scripta
881 citations, 0.64%
|
|
RSC Advances
832 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry C
789 citations, 0.57%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
756 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
738 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Micromachines
701 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Nanotechnology
698 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Sensors
686 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
677 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing
658 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Materials Research Express
638 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Results in Physics
623 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Journal of Physics Condensed Matter
591 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Physics of Plasmas
589 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Journal of Materials Chemistry C
574 citations, 0.42%
|
|
IEEE Access
570 citations, 0.41%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices
565 citations, 0.41%
|
|
AIP Conference Proceedings
542 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Physica B: Condensed Matter
521 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Nanoscale
511 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Chinese Physics B
497 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Physical Review Materials
496 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing
491 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Nature Communications
463 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Electronic Materials
454 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Advanced Materials
441 citations, 0.32%
|
|
ACS Omega
436 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
431 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Liquids
430 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Crystals
426 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Materials Today Communications
421 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Advanced Functional Materials
419 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Energies
408 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Materials Chemistry and Physics
403 citations, 0.29%
|
|
ACS Applied Electronic Materials
403 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
390 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Optical Materials
382 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Physics
374 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Optical and Quantum Electronics
374 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Applied Physics Express
371 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Physica Status Solidi (A) Applications and Materials Science
369 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Acta Physica Sinica
362 citations, 0.26%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science
361 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Review of Scientific Instruments
361 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Physical Review Letters
360 citations, 0.26%
|
|
IEEE Sensors Journal
351 citations, 0.25%
|
|
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
350 citations, 0.25%
|
|
ACS Applied Nano Materials
349 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Acta Materialia
348 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Thin Solid Films
346 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Nano Letters
341 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Carbon
338 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Vacuum
337 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism
337 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Advanced Electronic Materials
331 citations, 0.24%
|
|
AEJ - Alexandria Engineering Journal
330 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Coatings
328 citations, 0.24%
|
|
European Physical Journal Plus
325 citations, 0.24%
|
|
ACS Nano
323 citations, 0.23%
|
|
APL Materials
306 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Sensors and Actuators, A: Physical
305 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Materials Science
304 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Materials Science and Engineering B: Solid-State Materials for Advanced Technology
298 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Optik
293 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Computational Materials Science
291 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Semiconductor Science and Technology
291 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Polymers
289 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Materials Today: Proceedings
285 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
284 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Applied Optics
283 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Physical Review E
277 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Heliyon
277 citations, 0.2%
|
|
International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
273 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Materials Chemistry A
270 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Waves in Random and Complex Media
268 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Optics Letters
265 citations, 0.19%
|
|
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
262 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids
256 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Smart Materials and Structures
248 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Optics and Laser Technology
248 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Modern Physics Letters B
243 citations, 0.18%
|
|
ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology
242 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
|
Citing publishers
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
|
|
Elsevier
33537 citations, 24.3%
|
|
Springer Nature
15727 citations, 11.4%
|
|
AIP Publishing
14891 citations, 10.79%
|
|
MDPI
9146 citations, 6.63%
|
|
IOP Publishing
9048 citations, 6.56%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
8019 citations, 5.81%
|
|
Wiley
7889 citations, 5.72%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
6606 citations, 4.79%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
5331 citations, 3.86%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
4669 citations, 3.38%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
2609 citations, 1.89%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
2260 citations, 1.64%
|
|
Japan Society of Applied Physics
1157 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
1109 citations, 0.8%
|
|
World Scientific
892 citations, 0.65%
|
|
SAGE
740 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
703 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
631 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
556 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
492 citations, 0.36%
|
|
American Vacuum Society
465 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Acta Physica Sinica, Chinese Physical Society and Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
394 citations, 0.29%
|
|
SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
370 citations, 0.27%
|
|
The Electrochemical Society
368 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
342 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
300 citations, 0.22%
|
|
ASME International
289 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Emerald
268 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Alexandria University
245 citations, 0.18%
|
|
EDP Sciences
235 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Oxford University Press
198 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
179 citations, 0.13%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
162 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
152 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Japan Institute of Metals
146 citations, 0.11%
|
|
IntechOpen
141 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Physical Society of Japan
131 citations, 0.09%
|
|
The Royal Society
125 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
117 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
110 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Science in China Press
110 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Scientific Publishers
104 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Beilstein-Institut
95 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
93 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Begell House
88 citations, 0.06%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
82 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan (IEE Japan)
79 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
78 citations, 0.06%
|
|
IOS Press
74 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
69 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Chinese Society of Rare Earths
63 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Ain Shams University
60 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Astronomical Society
59 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Nonferrous Metals Society of China
58 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
56 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Tech Science Press
56 citations, 0.04%
|
|
55 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
52 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
51 citations, 0.04%
|
|
King Saud University
50 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
49 citations, 0.04%
|
|
SAE International
46 citations, 0.03%
|
|
International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
44 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Tsinghua University Press
44 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
44 citations, 0.03%
|
|
IGI Global
44 citations, 0.03%
|
|
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Co. LTD Ukrinformnauka) (Publications)
40 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers
39 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
39 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Japan Society of Powder and Powder Metallurgy
38 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Annual Reviews
36 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk Journal
34 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Society of Industrial Engineering Chemistry
33 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Chinese Ceramic Society
33 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Copernicus
33 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Surface Science Society of Japan
32 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Institute of Metals and Materials
31 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Geophysical Union
31 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institute of Electronics, Information and Communications Engineers (IEICE)
30 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Optical Society of India
29 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ceramic Society of Japan
26 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Chemical Society of Japan
26 citations, 0.02%
|
|
National Library of Serbia
26 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
24 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Stichting SciPost
24 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics
24 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Hans Publishers
24 citations, 0.02%
|
|
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
24 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
23 citations, 0.02%
|
|
National University of Science & Technology (MISiS)
23 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Magnetics Society of Japan
23 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Scientific Publishers
22 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Thomas Telford
22 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Ceramic Society
21 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT)
21 citations, 0.02%
|
|
21 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)
19 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Laser Institute of America
19 citations, 0.01%
|
|
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine - Institute of Semiconductor Physics
19 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Publishing House for Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (Publications)
19 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
|
Publishing organizations
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
295 publications, 1.79%
|
|
Tohoku University
273 publications, 1.65%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
261 publications, 1.58%
|
|
University of Science and Technology of China
223 publications, 1.35%
|
|
Tsinghua University
215 publications, 1.3%
|
|
Nanjing University
215 publications, 1.3%
|
|
University of Tokyo
172 publications, 1.04%
|
|
National University of Defense Technology
171 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Zhejiang University
160 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Harbin Institute of Technology
150 publications, 0.91%
|
|
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
143 publications, 0.87%
|
|
Peking University
138 publications, 0.84%
|
|
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
135 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Osaka University
129 publications, 0.78%
|
|
King Saud University
127 publications, 0.77%
|
|
Jiangsu University
120 publications, 0.73%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
117 publications, 0.71%
|
|
Southeast University
115 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Beihang University
101 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
99 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Jilin University
99 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Beijing Institute of Technology
98 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Chongqing University
98 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Nanjing University of Science and Technology
97 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Northwestern Polytechnical University
96 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Xidian University
96 publications, 0.58%
|
|
National Institute for Materials Science
95 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Science and Technology Beijing
92 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Sichuan University
91 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Hebei University of Technology
90 publications, 0.54%
|
|
National University of Singapore
89 publications, 0.54%
|
|
National Taiwan University
89 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Fudan University
88 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
87 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Japan Science and Technology Agency
87 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
86 publications, 0.52%
|
|
COMSATS University Islamabad
84 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Xi'an University of Technology
82 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures
82 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Kyoto University
81 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Indian Institute of Science
80 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
80 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
80 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Lanzhou University
80 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Shanghai University
78 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
78 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Tongji University
77 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Wuhan University
76 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Shandong University
76 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
75 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Tianjin University
75 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Nagoya University
75 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Central South University
72 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Quaid-i-Azam University
70 publications, 0.42%
|
|
North University of China
70 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Xiamen University
69 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Kyushu University
69 publications, 0.42%
|
|
King Abdulaziz University
68 publications, 0.41%
|
|
South China University of Technology
68 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences
66 publications, 0.4%
|
|
North China Electric Power University
64 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Seoul National University
64 publications, 0.39%
|
|
Beijing University of Technology
61 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University
60 publications, 0.36%
|
|
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
60 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Harbin Engineering University
59 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
59 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Iowa State University
58 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
56 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Tsukuba
56 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Minnesota
56 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Université Paris-Saclay
55 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Chungnam National University
54 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Los Alamos National Laboratory
53 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications
51 publications, 0.31%
|
|
China University of Mining and Technology
50 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Yanshan University
50 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
50 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
49 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
49 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
48 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Air Force Engineering University
48 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
48 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Hanyang University
48 publications, 0.29%
|
|
National Institute of Standards and Technology
48 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences
47 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Taiyuan University of Technology
47 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
47 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Taif University
45 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Wuhan University of Technology
45 publications, 0.27%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University
45 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology
45 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Shanxi University
44 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Guangdong University of Technology
44 publications, 0.27%
|
|
National Physical Laboratory of India
43 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Nanchang University
43 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Shenzhen University
43 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Soochow University (Suzhou)
43 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Suzhou Institute of Nano-tech and Nano-bionics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
43 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Lahore
42 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
150 publications, 1.89%
|
|
Tohoku University
115 publications, 1.45%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
111 publications, 1.4%
|
|
King Saud University
108 publications, 1.36%
|
|
National University of Defense Technology
108 publications, 1.36%
|
|
University of Science and Technology of China
102 publications, 1.29%
|
|
Zhejiang University
70 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Jiangsu University
68 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Tsinghua University
64 publications, 0.81%
|
|
University of Tokyo
63 publications, 0.79%
|
|
Harbin Institute of Technology
62 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University
59 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Nanjing University
59 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Nanjing University of Science and Technology
57 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Peking University
56 publications, 0.71%
|
|
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
54 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Hebei University of Technology
52 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Xi'an University of Technology
52 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Osaka University
51 publications, 0.64%
|
|
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
49 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
49 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences
47 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Sichuan University
46 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Northwestern Polytechnical University
45 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
44 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
44 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
44 publications, 0.55%
|
|
Jilin University
42 publications, 0.53%
|
|
North University of China
42 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Dalian University of Technology
41 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Nagoya University
41 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Taif University
39 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Beijing Institute of Technology
39 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Harbin Engineering University
39 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Xidian University
39 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Shandong University
39 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Kyoto University
39 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Beihang University
37 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Fudan University
34 publications, 0.43%
|
|
University of Science and Technology Beijing
33 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Shanghai University
33 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Umm al-Qura University
32 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Southeast University
32 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Tianjin University
32 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Hefei University of Technology
32 publications, 0.4%
|
|
North China Electric Power University
30 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Nanchang University
30 publications, 0.38%
|
|
National Institute for Materials Science
30 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Lebanese American University
30 publications, 0.38%
|
|
China Three Gorges University
29 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology
29 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Kyushu University
29 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Tongji University
28 publications, 0.35%
|
|
China University of Mining and Technology
28 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Wuhan University
28 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Chongqing University
28 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Air Force Engineering University
28 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Japan Science and Technology Agency
28 publications, 0.35%
|
|
COMSATS University Islamabad
27 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Guangdong University of Technology
27 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Chungnam National University
27 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Shenzhen University
26 publications, 0.33%
|
|
American University of Beirut
26 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences
26 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
26 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures
26 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Lahore
25 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Minnesota
25 publications, 0.32%
|
|
King Abdulaziz University
24 publications, 0.3%
|
|
South China University of Technology
24 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Sun Yat-sen University
24 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Xiamen University
24 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Southern University of Science and Technology
24 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Liaoning Technical University
24 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
24 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Seoul National University
24 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Los Alamos National Laboratory
24 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Guangxi University
24 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Abdul Wali Khan University
23 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Beijing University of Technology
23 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Imperial College London
23 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
22 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Southwest Jiaotong University
22 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Xi'an Technological University
22 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Hanyang University
22 publications, 0.28%
|
|
National Institute of Standards and Technology
22 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Lanzhou University
22 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Khulna University of Engineering and Technology
22 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University
21 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Wuhan University of Technology
21 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Hubei University of Technology
21 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Shanxi University
21 publications, 0.26%
|
|
National Taiwan University
21 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Anhui University of Science and Technology
21 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Korea University
21 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Homi Bhabha National Institute
20 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Central South University
20 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications
20 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Jiangnan University
20 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Cairo University
20 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
|
Publishing countries
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
|
|
China
|
China, 7363, 44.57%
China
7363 publications, 44.57%
|
USA
|
USA, 2368, 14.33%
USA
2368 publications, 14.33%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 1822, 11.03%
Japan
1822 publications, 11.03%
|
India
|
India, 946, 5.73%
India
946 publications, 5.73%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 737, 4.46%
Republic of Korea
737 publications, 4.46%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 601, 3.64%
Germany
601 publications, 3.64%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 456, 2.76%
Saudi Arabia
456 publications, 2.76%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 386, 2.34%
Pakistan
386 publications, 2.34%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 385, 2.33%
United Kingdom
385 publications, 2.33%
|
France
|
France, 348, 2.11%
France
348 publications, 2.11%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 267, 1.62%
Russia
267 publications, 1.62%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 233, 1.41%
Canada
233 publications, 1.41%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 213, 1.29%
Italy
213 publications, 1.29%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 182, 1.1%
Singapore
182 publications, 1.1%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 175, 1.06%
Bangladesh
175 publications, 1.06%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 171, 1.04%
Egypt
171 publications, 1.04%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 161, 0.97%
Spain
161 publications, 0.97%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 160, 0.97%
Iran
160 publications, 0.97%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 140, 0.85%
Australia
140 publications, 0.85%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 127, 0.77%
Sweden
127 publications, 0.77%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 117, 0.71%
Turkey
117 publications, 0.71%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 110, 0.67%
Brazil
110 publications, 0.67%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 102, 0.62%
Poland
102 publications, 0.62%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 86, 0.52%
Mexico
86 publications, 0.52%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 85, 0.51%
Netherlands
85 publications, 0.51%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 82, 0.5%
Czech Republic
82 publications, 0.5%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 76, 0.46%
Vietnam
76 publications, 0.46%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 73, 0.44%
Finland
73 publications, 0.44%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 71, 0.43%
Switzerland
71 publications, 0.43%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 64, 0.39%
South Africa
64 publications, 0.39%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 58, 0.35%
Belgium
58 publications, 0.35%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 58, 0.35%
Thailand
58 publications, 0.35%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 54, 0.33%
Malaysia
54 publications, 0.33%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 53, 0.32%
Austria
53 publications, 0.32%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 51, 0.31%
Greece
51 publications, 0.31%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 50, 0.3%
Ukraine
50 publications, 0.3%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 50, 0.3%
Ghana
50 publications, 0.3%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 50, 0.3%
Romania
50 publications, 0.3%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 49, 0.3%
Israel
49 publications, 0.3%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 49, 0.3%
Norway
49 publications, 0.3%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 45, 0.27%
Ireland
45 publications, 0.27%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 45, 0.27%
UAE
45 publications, 0.27%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 37, 0.22%
Jordan
37 publications, 0.22%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 37, 0.22%
Nigeria
37 publications, 0.22%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 36, 0.22%
Lebanon
36 publications, 0.22%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 35, 0.21%
Indonesia
35 publications, 0.21%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 35, 0.21%
Nepal
35 publications, 0.21%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 35, 0.21%
Ethiopia
35 publications, 0.21%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 34, 0.21%
Denmark
34 publications, 0.21%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 32, 0.19%
Slovakia
32 publications, 0.19%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 30, 0.18%
Portugal
30 publications, 0.18%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 27, 0.16%
Algeria
27 publications, 0.16%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 23, 0.14%
Iraq
23 publications, 0.14%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 22, 0.13%
Chile
22 publications, 0.13%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 20, 0.12%
Tunisia
20 publications, 0.12%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 19, 0.12%
Cameroon
19 publications, 0.12%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 19, 0.12%
New Zealand
19 publications, 0.12%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 17, 0.1%
Argentina
17 publications, 0.1%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 17, 0.1%
Kenya
17 publications, 0.1%
|
North Korea
|
North Korea, 17, 0.1%
North Korea
17 publications, 0.1%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 17, 0.1%
Colombia
17 publications, 0.1%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 16, 0.1%
Hungary
16 publications, 0.1%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 16, 0.1%
Slovenia
16 publications, 0.1%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 15, 0.09%
Belarus
15 publications, 0.09%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 14, 0.08%
Kuwait
14 publications, 0.08%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 13, 0.08%
Kazakhstan
13 publications, 0.08%
|
Afghanistan
|
Afghanistan, 12, 0.07%
Afghanistan
12 publications, 0.07%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 12, 0.07%
Lithuania
12 publications, 0.07%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 12, 0.07%
Morocco
12 publications, 0.07%
|
Palestine
|
Palestine, 9, 0.05%
Palestine
9 publications, 0.05%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 8, 0.05%
Estonia
8 publications, 0.05%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 8, 0.05%
Iceland
8 publications, 0.05%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 8, 0.05%
Qatar
8 publications, 0.05%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 8, 0.05%
Serbia
8 publications, 0.05%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 8, 0.05%
Philippines
8 publications, 0.05%
|
Sudan
|
Sudan, 7, 0.04%
Sudan
7 publications, 0.04%
|
Montenegro
|
Montenegro, 7, 0.04%
Montenegro
7 publications, 0.04%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 6, 0.04%
Venezuela
6 publications, 0.04%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 6, 0.04%
Cyprus
6 publications, 0.04%
|
Kyrgyzstan
|
Kyrgyzstan, 6, 0.04%
Kyrgyzstan
6 publications, 0.04%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 6, 0.04%
Oman
6 publications, 0.04%
|
Rwanda
|
Rwanda, 6, 0.04%
Rwanda
6 publications, 0.04%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 6, 0.04%
Sri Lanka
6 publications, 0.04%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 5, 0.03%
Costa Rica
5 publications, 0.03%
|
Syria
|
Syria, 5, 0.03%
Syria
5 publications, 0.03%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 4, 0.02%
Zambia
4 publications, 0.02%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 4, 0.02%
Cuba
4 publications, 0.02%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 4, 0.02%
Ecuador
4 publications, 0.02%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 3, 0.02%
Armenia
3 publications, 0.02%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 3, 0.02%
Bahrain
3 publications, 0.02%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 3, 0.02%
Georgia
3 publications, 0.02%
|
Yemen
|
Yemen, 3, 0.02%
Yemen
3 publications, 0.02%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 3, 0.02%
Latvia
3 publications, 0.02%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 3, 0.02%
Luxembourg
3 publications, 0.02%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 3, 0.02%
Mongolia
3 publications, 0.02%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 3, 0.02%
Peru
3 publications, 0.02%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 3, 0.02%
Croatia
3 publications, 0.02%
|
Azerbaijan
|
Azerbaijan, 2, 0.01%
Azerbaijan
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 2, 0.01%
Bulgaria
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 2, 0.01%
Malta
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
|
|
China
|
China, 3539, 44.61%
China
3539 publications, 44.61%
|
USA
|
USA, 826, 10.41%
USA
826 publications, 10.41%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 700, 8.82%
Japan
700 publications, 8.82%
|
India
|
India, 359, 4.53%
India
359 publications, 4.53%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 327, 4.12%
Saudi Arabia
327 publications, 4.12%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 276, 3.48%
Republic of Korea
276 publications, 3.48%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 189, 2.38%
Germany
189 publications, 2.38%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 168, 2.12%
Pakistan
168 publications, 2.12%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 153, 1.93%
United Kingdom
153 publications, 1.93%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 141, 1.78%
Bangladesh
141 publications, 1.78%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 129, 1.63%
Egypt
129 publications, 1.63%
|
France
|
France, 98, 1.24%
France
98 publications, 1.24%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 92, 1.16%
Italy
92 publications, 1.16%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 87, 1.1%
Russia
87 publications, 1.1%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 84, 1.06%
Canada
84 publications, 1.06%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 76, 0.96%
Iran
76 publications, 0.96%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 62, 0.78%
Turkey
62 publications, 0.78%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 49, 0.62%
Spain
49 publications, 0.62%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 44, 0.55%
Vietnam
44 publications, 0.55%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 41, 0.52%
Australia
41 publications, 0.52%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 39, 0.49%
Thailand
39 publications, 0.49%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 38, 0.48%
Ghana
38 publications, 0.48%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 37, 0.47%
Poland
37 publications, 0.47%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 36, 0.45%
Brazil
36 publications, 0.45%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 36, 0.45%
South Africa
36 publications, 0.45%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 34, 0.43%
Singapore
34 publications, 0.43%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 32, 0.4%
Mexico
32 publications, 0.4%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 32, 0.4%
Sweden
32 publications, 0.4%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 31, 0.39%
Finland
31 publications, 0.39%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 30, 0.38%
Jordan
30 publications, 0.38%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 30, 0.38%
Lebanon
30 publications, 0.38%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 30, 0.38%
Romania
30 publications, 0.38%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 28, 0.35%
Nepal
28 publications, 0.35%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 28, 0.35%
Ethiopia
28 publications, 0.35%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 25, 0.32%
Norway
25 publications, 0.32%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 24, 0.3%
Netherlands
24 publications, 0.3%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 24, 0.3%
UAE
24 publications, 0.3%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 23, 0.29%
Nigeria
23 publications, 0.29%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 23, 0.29%
Switzerland
23 publications, 0.29%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 22, 0.28%
Indonesia
22 publications, 0.28%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 21, 0.26%
Malaysia
21 publications, 0.26%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 19, 0.24%
Ukraine
19 publications, 0.24%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 19, 0.24%
Greece
19 publications, 0.24%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 19, 0.24%
Cameroon
19 publications, 0.24%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 18, 0.23%
Austria
18 publications, 0.23%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 18, 0.23%
Belgium
18 publications, 0.23%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 17, 0.21%
Israel
17 publications, 0.21%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 17, 0.21%
Ireland
17 publications, 0.21%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 16, 0.2%
Algeria
16 publications, 0.2%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 16, 0.2%
Iraq
16 publications, 0.2%
|
North Korea
|
North Korea, 16, 0.2%
North Korea
16 publications, 0.2%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 15, 0.19%
Czech Republic
15 publications, 0.19%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 14, 0.18%
Kenya
14 publications, 0.18%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 14, 0.18%
Tunisia
14 publications, 0.18%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 13, 0.16%
Denmark
13 publications, 0.16%
|
Afghanistan
|
Afghanistan, 12, 0.15%
Afghanistan
12 publications, 0.15%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 12, 0.15%
Slovakia
12 publications, 0.15%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 11, 0.14%
New Zealand
11 publications, 0.14%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 9, 0.11%
Portugal
9 publications, 0.11%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 9, 0.11%
Colombia
9 publications, 0.11%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 9, 0.11%
Chile
9 publications, 0.11%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 8, 0.1%
Kuwait
8 publications, 0.1%
|
Sudan
|
Sudan, 7, 0.09%
Sudan
7 publications, 0.09%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 6, 0.08%
Kazakhstan
6 publications, 0.08%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 6, 0.08%
Argentina
6 publications, 0.08%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 6, 0.08%
Hungary
6 publications, 0.08%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 6, 0.08%
Lithuania
6 publications, 0.08%
|
Palestine
|
Palestine, 6, 0.08%
Palestine
6 publications, 0.08%
|
Rwanda
|
Rwanda, 6, 0.08%
Rwanda
6 publications, 0.08%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 5, 0.06%
Belarus
5 publications, 0.06%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 5, 0.06%
Sri Lanka
5 publications, 0.06%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 4, 0.05%
Estonia
4 publications, 0.05%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 4, 0.05%
Zambia
4 publications, 0.05%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 4, 0.05%
Morocco
4 publications, 0.05%
|
Syria
|
Syria, 4, 0.05%
Syria
4 publications, 0.05%
|
Bahrain
|
Bahrain, 3, 0.04%
Bahrain
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 3, 0.04%
Venezuela
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Yemen
|
Yemen, 3, 0.04%
Yemen
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Kyrgyzstan
|
Kyrgyzstan, 3, 0.04%
Kyrgyzstan
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 3, 0.04%
Oman
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 3, 0.04%
Peru
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 3, 0.04%
Serbia
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 3, 0.04%
Slovenia
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 3, 0.04%
Philippines
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 2, 0.03%
Iceland
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 2, 0.03%
Qatar
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 2, 0.03%
Cuba
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 2, 0.03%
Latvia
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Somalia
|
Somalia, 2, 0.03%
Somalia
2 publications, 0.03%
|
Azerbaijan
|
Azerbaijan, 1, 0.01%
Azerbaijan
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Barbados
|
Barbados, 1, 0.01%
Barbados
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Benin
|
Benin, 1, 0.01%
Benin
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Burundi
|
Burundi, 1, 0.01%
Burundi
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Bhutan
|
Bhutan, 1, 0.01%
Bhutan
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Timor-Leste
|
Timor-Leste, 1, 0.01%
Timor-Leste
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Gambia
|
Gambia, 1, 0.01%
Gambia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 1, 0.01%
Georgia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 1, 0.01%
Cyprus
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 1, 0.01%
Costa Rica
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.01%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
|
7 profile journal articles
Yaping Dan
63 publications,
576 citations
h-index: 13
5 profile journal articles
Ayad Mohammed
129 publications,
260 citations
h-index: 7
4 profile journal articles
Hossain M.
🤝 🥼
PhD in Engineering, Full member of the Japan Academy

Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission
261 publications,
8 344 citations
h-index: 50
Research interests
Energy materials
Perovskite solar cells
4 profile journal articles
Saeidi Tale
25 publications,
405 citations
h-index: 12
4 profile journal articles
SEKHAR CHANDRA
48 publications,
636 citations
h-index: 15
3 profile journal articles
Koshelets V
DSc in Physics and Mathematics, Professor
307 publications,
3 857 citations
h-index: 31
3 profile journal articles
Rawat Rajeev

UGC-DAE Consortium for Scientific Research
192 publications,
2 363 citations
h-index: 26
2 profile journal articles
Khovaylo Vladimir
DSc in Physics and Mathematics

National University of Science & Technology (MISiS)
252 publications,
5 040 citations
h-index: 35