Current Osteoporosis Reports
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
4.2
SJR
1.231
CiteScore
8.4
Categories
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Areas
Medicine
Years of issue
2003-2025
journal names
Current Osteoporosis Reports
CURR OSTEOPOROS REP
Top-3 citing journals

Bone
(1011 citations)

Osteoporosis International
(691 citations)

International Journal of Molecular Sciences
(686 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Indiana University School of Medicine
(50 publications)

University of California, San Francisco
(32 publications)

Harvard University
(30 publications)

Indiana University School of Medicine
(27 publications)

University of Melbourne
(12 publications)

University of Michigan
(12 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 941
Q2

Rhinitis in the Geriatric Population: Epidemiological and Cytological Aspects
Gelardi M., Giancaspro R., Boni E., Di Gioacchino M., Cintoli G., Cassano M., Ventura M.T.
Allergic rhinitis (AR), traditionally considered as a childhood condition, is increasingly recognized among older adults, driven by rising life expectancy and environmental factors. Although allergic sensitization declines with age, AR prevalence in the elderly is underestimated, with 3–12% of geriatric patients affected. Diagnosis is challenging due to nonspecific symptoms and overlapping conditions, leading to underdiagnosis and inadequate treatment. AR significantly impacts the quality of life (QoL), often exacerbating respiratory comorbidities like asthma and COPD. Presbynasalis, encompassing age-related sinonasal changes, includes reduced allergic responses, increased chronic rhinosinusitis, altered nasal structure, and impaired mucociliary clearance. Non-allergic rhinitis, atrophic rhinitis, and overlapping rhinitis further complicate AR diagnosis in the elderly. Effective management involves personalized pharmacotherapy, allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT), and addressing comorbidities and polypharmacy risks. Despite safety concerns, recent studies demonstrate AIT efficacy in elderly patients, reducing symptoms and medication use. Given AR’s impact on cognitive and respiratory health, accurate diagnosis and treatment can enhance QoL and mitigate health decline. Greater awareness and further research are essential to understand AR prevalence and improve outcomes for geriatric patients.
Q2

Evaluation of Convolutional Neural Network-Based Posture Identification Model of Older Adults: From Silhouette of Sagittal Photographs
Sugiyama N., Kai Y., Koda H., Morihara T., Kida N.
Background/Objectives: Posture is a significant indicator of health status in older adults. This study aimed to develop an automatic posture assessment tool based on sagittal photographs by validating recognition models using convolutional neural networks. Methods: A total of 9140 images were collected with data augmentation, and each image was labeled as either Ideal or Non-Ideal posture by physical therapists. The hidden and output layers of the models remained unchanged, while the loss function and optimizer were varied to construct four different model configurations: mean squared error and Adam (MSE & Adam), mean squared error and stochastic gradient descent (MSE & SGD), binary cross-entropy and Adam (BCE & Adam), and binary cross-entropy and stochastic gradient descent (BCE & SGD). Results: All four models demonstrated an improved accuracy in both the training and validation phases. However, the two BCE models exhibited divergence in validation loss, suggesting overfitting. Conversely, the two MSE models showed stability during learning. Therefore, we focused on the MSE models and evaluated their reliability using sensitivity, specificity, and Prevalence-Adjusted Bias-Adjusted Kappa (PABAK) based on the model’s output and correct label. Sensitivity and specificity were 85% and 84% for MSE & Adam and 67% and 77% for MSE & SGD, respectively. Moreover, PABAK values for agreement with the correct label were 0.69 and 0.43 for MSE & Adam and MSE & SGD, respectively. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the MSE & Adam model, in particular, can serve as a useful tool for screening inspections.
Q2

Comprehensive Geriatric Health Assessment Core Competencies and Skills for Primary Care Nurses: A Scoping Review
Dimitriadou I., Sini E., Šteinmiller J., Saridi M., Lundberg A., Häger M., Hjaltadottir I., Skuladottir S.S., Korsström N., Mört S., Tuori H., Fradelos E.C.
Objective: This scoping review aims to explore and synthesize the core competencies and skills required for primary care nurses conducting comprehensive geriatric assessments. Comprehensive geriatric assessments have become integral to providing holistic, patient-centered care for older adults with complex health needs, but the specific competencies required in primary care remain underresearched. Design: The review followed Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage scoping review framework, incorporating studies from PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. A comprehensive search was conducted from May 2014 to May 2024, and a population–concept–context (PCC) framework was used to identify relevant studies. Results: Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria, revealing six key competency domains for nurses involved in comprehensive geriatric assessments: Clinical Assessment and Diagnostic Competencies, Care Planning and Coordination, Professional and Interpersonal Competencies, Environmental and Systemic Competencies, Technical and Procedural Competencies, and Quality Improvement and Evidence-Based Practice. These competencies are essential for providing high-quality care to older adults and supporting integrated, multidisciplinary approaches to geriatric care. Conclusions: The identified competency domains provide a structured framework that can enhance primary care nurses’ ability to deliver more effective, individualized, and coordinated care to older adults. However, the standardization of these competencies remains crucial for ensuring consistency in practice.
Q2

Aging-Related Changes in Bimanual Coordination as a Screening Tool for Healthy Aging
Shizuka Y., Murata S., Goda A., Sawai S., Fujikawa S., Yamamoto R., Maru T., Nakagawa K., Nakano H.
Background/Objectives: The steady increase in the global older adult population highlights critical challenges, including the development of preventive strategies to extend healthy life expectancy and support independence in activities of daily living. Although there is an aging-related reduction in manual dexterity, the difference in bimanual coordination performance between young and older adults remains unclear. We aimed to elucidate the characteristics of bimanual coordination among young, young-old, and old-old adult participants. Methods: The participants performed in-phase (tapping the thumb and index finger together as fast as possible) and anti-phase (alternating movement between the left and right fingers) bimanual coordination tasks, and intergroup comparison of the task parameters was performed. The receiver operating characteristic curve was also conducted to calculate age cut-off points for bimanual coordination. Results: The number and frequency of taps significantly decreased sequentially in young, young-old, and old-old adults, whereas the average of tap interval significantly increased in this order (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the young-old and old-old groups in the average local maximum distance (p > 0.05). These findings indicate that bimanual coordination task performance varies depending on specific parameters. Furthermore, the age cut-off points for bimanual coordination were determined as 68.5 years for the right-hand number of taps (AUC = 0.73) in the anti-phase task, 73.5 years for the right-hand average of tapping interval (AUC = 0.72) in the anti-phase task, and 65.5 years for the left-hand frequency of taps (AUC = 0.72) of the anti-phase task. Conclusions: the number of taps, average of tapping interval, and frequency of taps are potential indicators of aging-related changes in bimanual coordination.
Q2

Establishment of a Mandarin Chinese Version of the Oral Frailty Index-8 and Exploration of the Association Between Oral Frailty and Sarcopenia
Yang C., Chen H., Iijima K., Tanaka T., Dai C., Yu S., Chuang H.
Objective: The aim of our study was to introduce a Mandarin Chinese version of the oral frailty assessment and explore the relationship between oral frailty and sarcopenia. A total of 409 elders (171 male, 238 female) participated in surveys using the Mandarin Chinese version of the Oral Frailty Index-8 (OFI-8) in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Method: The translation of the Mandarin Chinese version of OFI-8 adhered to the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) reporting guidelines. The eight-item questionnaire assessed tooth status, oral function, and other subjective measures. Additionally, sarcopenia was evaluated using the SARC-F questionnaire. Result: Among the participants, 195 participants were classified as non-oral frailty and 214 participants were oral frailty. Significant differences were observed in age, gender, body mass index (BMI), education level, and scores on the SARC-F questionnaire between the non-oral frailty and oral frailty populations. In logistic regression model, oral frailty showed a significant and positive association with the SARC-F score (adjusted odds ratio 2.130, 95% confidence interval 1.580–2.872, p-value < 0.001), even after adjusting for age, gender, BMI, and education level. Conclusion: This study has developed a valuable Mandarin Chinese version of the oral frailty screening questionnaire, the OFI-8. Oral frailty is significantly and positively associated with a higher risk of sarcopenia, particularly among the elderly, males, and those with lower education levels. This measure proves to be practical for assessing oral health status in the Chinese community, promoting oral frailty research within the Mandarin Chinese population, and addressing the challenges associated with defining oral frailty in future studies.
Q2

Prevalence of Poor Diet Quality and Associated Factors Among Older Adults from the Bagé Cohort Study of Ageing, Brazil (SIGa-Bagé)
Valério T.D., Neves R.G., Thumé E., Machado K.P., Tomasi E.
(1) Background: The accelerated aging of the population raises concerns about the diet of older adults due to its relationship with health and quality of life. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of poor diet quality and its association with sociodemographic factors and health status among older adults residing in the city of Bagé, located in southern Brazil; (2) Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using data from the 2016/2017 follow-up of the Bagé Aging Cohort Study (SIGa-Bagé). Diet quality was assessed using the Elderly Diet Quality Index. Descriptive analysis and Poisson regression with robust variance adjustment, based on hierarchical levels, were used to calculate crude and adjusted prevalence ratios with their respective 95% confidence intervals; (3) Results: The sample included 728 older adults (65.7% female; mean age: 77.2 years). Poor diet quality was observed in 41.5% of participants. After adjustment, male sex, black or brown skin color, absence of multimorbidity, and presence of depressive symptoms were significantly associated with poor diet quality; (4) Conclusions: The findings highlight the most vulnerable groups and the need for investments in strategies to promote mental health and healthy eating habits among the older adults, particularly among men and racial minority groups.
Q2

Impact of an Interprofessional Collaboration Between Physicians and Pharmacists on Fall-Risk-Increasing Drugs in Older Patients with Trauma in the Emergency Department
Hellinger B.J., Gries A., Bertsche T., Remane Y.
Background/Objectives: In older patients, falls constitute a significant public health concern and a major cause of hospital admission. Fall-risk-increasing drugs (FRIDs) represent a key risk factor for falls. Therefore, modifying these drugs represents an important strategy for preventing recurrent falls and further patient harm. The objective of this study was to evaluate a structured interprofessional collaboration between physicians and pharmacists on managing FRIDs in older patients who present to the emergency department (ED) after a fall. Methods: This study was performed in the ED of a tertiary care hospital. Patients who were >65 years old and presented to the ED after a fall were included. A routine care group was included between 1 March 2020 and 31 May 2020. A pharmaceutical care group was included between 1 September 2023 and 30 November 2023. In the pharmaceutical care group, a clinical pharmacist supported the physicians in identifying and managing FRIDs. Possible solutions for improving FRID prescription were discussed interprofessionally. The number of FRIDs at ED admission and discharge, as well as the number of FRID modifications, were evaluated. Results: A total of 107 patients were enrolled in each group. There were 85 patients in the routine care group and 89 patients in the pharmaceutical care group, with at least 1 FRID prescribed at ED admission (p = 0.483). At ED discharge, there were 85 patients in the routine care group and 68 patients in the pharmaceutical care group, with at least 1 FRID prescribed at (p = 0.010). There were seven FRID modifications in the routine care group compared to 125 FRID modifications in the pharmaceutical care group. Conclusions: In this study, the interprofessional collaboration between physicians and pharmacists led to a reduced number of FRIDs being prescribed and more FRID modifications in older patients at ED discharge. Further research is required to ascertain the feasibility of integrating this single intervention into a multifactorial fall prevention program.
Q2

Anemia in Elderly Patients: Contribution of Renal Aging and Chronic Kidney Disease
Santos S., Lousa I., Carvalho M., Sameiro-Faria M., Santos-Silva A., Belo L.
Renal aging is a physiological process characterized by structural and functional changes in the kidneys. The presence of disorders or pathologies can exacerbate these age-related changes, potentially leading to organ dysfunction. Chronic kidney disease (CKD), a significant global public health issue, is particularly prevalent in the elderly and is often associated with the age-related decline in kidney function. Anemia is one of the most frequent complications of CKD and is also highly prevalent in the elderly. Mild anemia, often multifactorial, is the most common presentation. Understanding the mechanisms driving anemia in this population is crucial to ensure appropriate treatment. The primary etiologies include nutritional deficiency, anemia of unknown cause, and anemia of chronic diseases, including CKD. This review provides an in-depth exploration of the complex pathophysiological mechanisms underlying anemia in elderly patients with CKD.
Q2

Case Report: Weakness and Recurrent Falls in an Older Patient
Galloway M., Hoffman N., Bray C.L., Ebrahim A., Puebla B., Ritchie D.
Background/Objectives: Lower-extremity weakness in older adults is often overlooked, yet it can have reversible or medical causes that contribute to increased falls. Common factors include vision disturbances, impaired balance due to otolith dysfunction, arthritis-related immobility, and lower-extremity neuropathy. This case presents a unique diagnostic challenge in evaluating bilateral lower-extremity weakness and recurrent falls in an older adult, highlighting the complexity of diagnosing conditions with overlapping symptoms. Case Presentation: The patient, a woman with a history of a neuroendocrine tumor, experienced progressive weakness in her lower extremities, along with oculomotor and facial muscle involvement, despite extensive testing. Key clinical findings included elevated protein levels in cerebrospinal fluid, suggesting the possibility of an infectious or autoimmune process. A thorough investigation was conducted, including testing for both common and rare conditions such as Guillain–Barré syndrome, Lyme disease, and tuberculosis. Results: Despite comprehensive diagnostic efforts, no clear etiology was identified. The patient’s condition was eventually considered to be related to carcinomatosis meningoencephalitis, a rare complication from a previous cancer diagnosis. Given the progressive nature of her symptoms and lack of treatment options, she was transitioned to palliative care. Conclusions: This case highlights the importance of a comprehensive differential diagnosis in older patients with unexplained weakness and falls. Rare neurological conditions should not be overlooked, even when more common causes are suspected. Clinicians should remain aware that falls and weakness in older adults may stem from various pathologies, some of which are reversible if identified early, and rare causes must always be considered when standard treatments fail.
Q2

Cognitive Performance Among Older Adults with Subjective Cognitive Decline
López-Higes R., Rubio-Valdehita S., López-Sanz D., Fernandes S.M., Rodrigues P.F., Delgado-Losada M.L.
Objectives: The main objective of this cross-sectional study was to investigate if there are significant differences in cognition between a group of older adults with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and cognitively intact controls. Methods: An initial sample of 132 older people underwent an extensive neuropsychological evaluation (memory, executive functions, and language) and were classified according to diagnostic criteria. Two groups of 33 subjects each, controls and SCD, were formed using an a priori case-matching procedures in different variables: age, biological sex, years of education, cognitive reserve, and Mini-Mental State Exam. Results: The mean age and standard deviation in the control group were equal to 70.39 ± 4.31 years, while in the SCD group, they were 70.30 ± 4.33 years. The number of males (n = 9) and females (n = 24) was equal in both groups; the means of years of education were also quite similar. SCD participants have a significantly lower mood than the controls. Significant differences between groups were obtained in delayed recall, inhibitory control, and comprehension of sentences not fitted to canonical word order in Spanish. A logistic regression revealed that a lower score on the Stroop’s interference condition is associated with a higher likelihood of having SCD. Finally, ROC analysis provided a model that performs better than random chance, and a cut-off score in Stroop’s interference condition equal to 49 was suggested for clinically differentiating the two groups. Conclusions: This study highlights that, compared to a matched control group, participants with SCD showed subtle but significant neuropsychological differences.
Q2

Effect of Protein Supplementation on Orthostatic Hypotension in Older Adult Patients with Heart Failure
Azhar G., Pangle A.K., Coker K., Sharma S., Wei J.Y.
Purpose: Heart failure (HF) impairs physical performance and increases the incidence of orthostatic hypotension (OH). Individuals with OH have a higher risk of falls, which are a major source of morbidity and mortality in older adults. Dietary protein supplementation can improve physical performance in healthy older adult individuals; however, its effect on OH in older adult patients with HF is unknown. Methods: Twenty-one older adult patients with mild-to-moderate HF were randomized to placebo or protein supplementation. Dietary protein was supplemented with whey protein so the total protein intake for each participant was 1.2 g/kg bodyweight/day, plus 1 g/day of the amino acid l-carnitine for 16 weeks. Susceptibility to OH was assessed using a head-up tilt test, blood markers, and a functional test (6 min walk) at baseline and 16 weeks. Results: There were no differences in tilt test responses or 6 min walk test (6MWT) distances. The protein-supplement group had a significant increase in 6MWT pulse pressures post-walk after 16 weeks of treatment as compared to placebo. However, the tachycardia observed at baseline after 6MWT in the protein group was not seen at the end of the study. There was also a trend towards lower levels of brain naturetic peptide (proBNP) in the protein group vs. placebo at 16 weeks. Conclusions: The improved pulse-pressure response to exertion and positive trends in proBNP in this pilot study suggest that dietary supplementation may improve cardiovascular function and general health in individuals with HF and that larger future studies are justifiable.
Q2

Assessing Frailty in the Older: The Role of Bite Force as an Independent Indicator
Ferreira L.M., Brito J., da Silva J.R., da Silva M.L., Fischel e Andrade M.E., Júdice A., Mendes J.J., Machado V., Botelho J.T., Regalo S.C.
Background: This study investigates the relationship between bite force and grip strength as indicators of frailty in older adults. Frailty syndrome, characterized by increased vulnerability to adverse health outcomes, poses significant challenges in geriatric care. Objectives: This research builds on previous findings linking oral health to frailty risk, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions. Methods: A total of 59 older participants, aged 60 years and older, were enrolled in this cross-sectional study conducted at the Egas Moniz School of Health and Science. The participants underwent assessments of bite force using an electric dynamometer and grip strength using a specialized device. Body composition was also measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Results: Statistical analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between bite force and grip strength, even after adjusting for age and body mass index (BMI). Age was significantly correlated with bite and grip force (p < 0.05), while BMI was correlated only with handgrip force but not with bite force (coefficient = −0.047, p = 0.737). Notably, bite force was found to be independent of BMI, unlike grip strength, which is generally influenced by body composition. This independence highlights the potential of bite force as a reliable and distinct marker for frailty that is not confounded by BMI-related factors. This study highlights the importance of oral health in maintaining overall well-being in older adults. Reduced bite force may indicate an increased risk of frailty, which can lead to malnutrition and decreased quality of life. These findings suggest that integrating bite force measurements into clinical assessments may improve the assessment of frailty and inform interventions aimed at improving health outcomes in the older population. Conclusions: This research provides new insights into the association between bite force and grip strength, emphasizing the unique value of bite force as an independent marker of frailty. It advocates for further studies to explore its role in geriatric care strategies.
Q2

Validation of the Italian Version of the Rapid Geriatric Assessment in Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Tacchino C., Carmisciano L., Page E., Ottaviani S., Tagliafico L., Boccini A., Signori A., Giannotti C., Nencioni A., Monacelli F.
Background/Objectives: The Rapid Geriatric Assessment (RGA) is a tool designed to screen for frailty, sarcopenia, anorexia related to aging, and cognitive impairment. This study aimed to translate and validate the RGA for use among Italian community-dwelling older adults. Methods: This cross-cultural study involved 100 community-dwelling older adults randomly recruited through convenience sampling from general practitioner offices in Genoa (Italy), between January and June 2019. The RGA includes the Simple FRAIL Questionnaire Screening Tool, SARC-F Screening for Sarcopenia, Simplified Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ), and Rapid Cognitive Screening (RCS). These were validated against gold-standard tools: the Abbreviated Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (aCGA) and Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI). Additional assessments included the Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Handgrip test. The validation process included forward–backward translation, synthesis, and consensus by independent reviewers. Psychometric properties, internal consistency (Cronbach alpha), and validity correlations were analyzed. Results: The RGA demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties, with internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.59) and significant validity correlations (RGA and aCGA, rho = 0.34, p = 0.001; RGA and MPI, rho = 0.49, p < 0.001). Discriminant validity was confirmed by significant correlations between specific subitems and reference measures: FRAIL with TUG (p < 0.05), SARC-F with Handgrip strength (p = 0.013), SNAQ with BMI, and RCS with MMSE (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The Italian version of the RGA is a reliable screening tool for geriatric syndromes in community-dwelling older adults. While it does not replace a CGA, the RGA may identify individuals who may benefit from further evaluation using a complete CGA.
Q2

Aging Gut-Brain Interactions: Pro-Inflammatory Gut Bacteria Are Elevated in Fecal Samples from Individuals Living with Alzheimer’s Dementia
Donaldson A.I., Fyfe C.L., Martin J.C., Smith E.E., Horgan G.W., Myint P.K., Johnstone A.M., Scott K.P.
Background/Objectives: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, characterized by an irreversible decline in cognitive function. The pathogenesis of several neurodegenerative disorders has been linked to changes in the gut microbiota, transmitted through the gut-brain axis. Methods: We set out to establish by case-control study methodology whether there were any differences in the composition and/or function of the gut microbiota between older resident adults in care homes with or without an AD diagnosis via analysis of the microbial composition from fecal samples. Results: The microbial composition, determined by 16S rRNA gene profiling, indicated that AD sufferers had significantly increased proportions of Escherichia/Shigella and Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1, and significantly decreased proportions of Bacteroides, Faecalibacterium, Blautia, and Roseburia species. The increase in potentially pro-inflammatory bacteria was consistent with slightly higher concentrations of calprotectin, a biomarker of gut inflammation. Fecal concentrations of most microbial metabolites measured were similar across groups, although participants with AD had significantly increased proportions of the branched-chain fatty acid, iso-butyrate, and lower overall concentrations of total short chain fatty acids. Conclusions: Participants with Alzheimer’s disease have several key differences within their gut microbiota profile, in contrast to care home residents without Alzheimer’s disease. The altered microbiome included both compositional and functional changes linked to poorer health and gut inflammation.
Q2

Health Professional Support for Friends and Family Members of Older People Discharged from Hospital After a Fracture: A Survey Study
Smith T.O., Arnold S., Baxter M.
Background/Objectives: Friends and family members of people who are discharged from hospital after a fracture often take on caring roles, since these patients have reduced independence during recovery. Previous literature suggests that these individuals are rarely supported in their adoption of these roles. No studies have previously explored the use of carer training interventions to support friends/family members by health professionals in this setting. This survey study aimed to address this. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among health professionals who treat people in hospital following fractures. Respondents were asked about the use of care training for friends/family members of people discharged from hospital after fracture, and whether a clinical trial would be useful to test such carer training interventions. Results: A total of 114 health professionals accessed the survey. Fifty respondents (44%) reported that carer training was not offered in their practice. When it was offered, respondents reported this was not consistently provided. Less than 12% of respondents reported offering carer training to most of their patients following a fracture. What was offered in these instances was largely based on education provision (69%), practical skills in exercise prescription (55%) and manual handling (51%). Ninety-eight percent of respondents reported that a clinical trial would be, or would potentially be, valuable to aid a change in practice to include carer training in routine clinical care. Conclusions: Carer training programmes are not routinely provided in clinical practice for people following a fracture. The results indicate that health professionals see a potential value in these programmes, but further research is recommended to provide an evidence base for these interventions.
Top-100
Citing journals
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
|
Bone
1011 citations, 3.14%
|
|
Osteoporosis International
691 citations, 2.14%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
686 citations, 2.13%
|
|
Current Osteoporosis Reports
645 citations, 2%
|
|
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
611 citations, 1.9%
|
|
Frontiers in Endocrinology
457 citations, 1.42%
|
|
Calcified Tissue International
341 citations, 1.06%
|
|
Scientific Reports
331 citations, 1.03%
|
|
Nutrients
320 citations, 0.99%
|
|
PLoS ONE
259 citations, 0.8%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
233 citations, 0.72%
|
|
JBMR Plus
227 citations, 0.7%
|
|
Archives of Osteoporosis
204 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
177 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Densitometry
174 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism
151 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Bone Reports
142 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Frontiers in Immunology
140 citations, 0.43%
|
|
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
137 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
128 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Bone Research
127 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
119 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Cells
111 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Biomedicines
105 citations, 0.33%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
102 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Acta Biomaterialia
99 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Frontiers in Pharmacology
98 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
93 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
93 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Cureus
93 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
82 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Frontiers in Physiology
81 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Medicine (United States)
75 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy
73 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
71 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Biomechanics
71 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Journal of Cellular Physiology
69 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Injury
69 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Cancers
69 citations, 0.21%
|
|
BioMed Research International
67 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Molecular Medicine Reports
64 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Endocrinology
64 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Biomolecules
63 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Materials
62 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Nature Reviews Endocrinology
61 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
61 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Clinical Reviews in Bone and Mineral Metabolism
59 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Endocrine
54 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Aging clinical and experimental research
54 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Molecules
52 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Biomaterials
52 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
51 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Stem Cell Research and Therapy
50 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Medicina
50 citations, 0.16%
|
|
FASEB Journal
48 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Nature reviews. Rheumatology
46 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Frontiers in Genetics
46 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
46 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A
45 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Endocrine Reviews
44 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease
44 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
44 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Heliyon
44 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Best Practice and Research in Clinical Rheumatology
43 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Nature Communications
42 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Frontiers in Nutrition
42 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Frontiers in Medicine
42 citations, 0.13%
|
|
eLife
42 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Orthopaedic Translation
41 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
41 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Journal of Biological Chemistry
41 citations, 0.13%
|
|
BMC Geriatrics
40 citations, 0.12%
|
|
International Immunopharmacology
40 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Current Opinion in Rheumatology
39 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Bioengineering
39 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Life Sciences
38 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Animals
37 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Cellular Biochemistry
37 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Bone Oncology
37 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Aging
36 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Diagnostics
36 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Pharmaceuticals
35 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Maturitas
35 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Archives of Oral Biology
35 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Clinical Investigation
34 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
34 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Genes
34 citations, 0.11%
|
|
BMC Oral Health
34 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Endocrine Practice
34 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Tissue Engineering - Part B: Reviews
34 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Menopause
34 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Arthritis Research and Therapy
33 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Frontiers in Oncology
33 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
33 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Stem Cells International
33 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Life
33 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Children
32 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Clinical Oral Investigations
31 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Ageing Research Reviews
31 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
31 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
|
Citing publishers
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
|
|
Elsevier
7548 citations, 23.43%
|
|
Springer Nature
6760 citations, 20.98%
|
|
Wiley
3247 citations, 10.08%
|
|
MDPI
2826 citations, 8.77%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
1530 citations, 4.75%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
908 citations, 2.82%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
857 citations, 2.66%
|
|
Oxford University Press
511 citations, 1.59%
|
|
SAGE
476 citations, 1.48%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
439 citations, 1.36%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
364 citations, 1.13%
|
|
The Endocrine Society
332 citations, 1.03%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
305 citations, 0.95%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
212 citations, 0.66%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
210 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
195 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
174 citations, 0.54%
|
|
BMJ
162 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
123 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
111 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
93 citations, 0.29%
|
|
S. Karger AG
93 citations, 0.29%
|
|
American Physiological Society
88 citations, 0.27%
|
|
AME Publishing Company
82 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
79 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
77 citations, 0.24%
|
|
American Society for Clinical Investigation
76 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB)
76 citations, 0.24%
|
|
SciELO
72 citations, 0.22%
|
|
IOP Publishing
70 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
69 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Impact Journals
67 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Bioscientifica
60 citations, 0.19%
|
|
IntechOpen
57 citations, 0.18%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
54 citations, 0.17%
|
|
American Society for Nutrition
53 citations, 0.16%
|
|
British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
50 citations, 0.16%
|
|
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
48 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
47 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
45 citations, 0.14%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
41 citations, 0.13%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
40 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Endocrinology Research Centre
38 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Association of Clinical Endocrinology
35 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Portico
35 citations, 0.11%
|
|
PeerJ
33 citations, 0.1%
|
|
IOS Press
32 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
32 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Eco-Vector LLC
28 citations, 0.09%
|
|
27 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Medknow
26 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
26 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
25 citations, 0.08%
|
|
ASME International
25 citations, 0.08%
|
|
The Royal Society
24 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research
24 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)
24 citations, 0.07%
|
|
AIP Publishing
23 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
23 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Hans Publishers
23 citations, 0.07%
|
|
World Scientific
21 citations, 0.07%
|
|
21 citations, 0.07%
|
|
JMIR Publications
21 citations, 0.07%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
19 citations, 0.06%
|
|
F1000 Research
19 citations, 0.06%
|
|
XMLink
19 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Diabetes Association
17 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Society of Nephrology
17 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Media Sphere Publishing House
17 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Portland Press
16 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Annual Reviews
16 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
16 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
16 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Human Kinetics
15 citations, 0.05%
|
|
SLACK
15 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
14 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Edizioni Minerva Medica
14 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Mediar Press
14 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
13 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Remedium, Ltd.
13 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Paediatrician Publishers LLC
12 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Optica Publishing Group
11 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Scientific Publishers
11 citations, 0.03%
|
|
British Institute of Radiology
11 citations, 0.03%
|
|
EDP Sciences
10 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
10 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
10 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
10 citations, 0.03%
|
|
10 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Japan Endocrine Society
10 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The American Association of Immunologists
10 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
King Saud University
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Higher Education Press
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Japanese Association for Oral Biology
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Korean Endocrine Society
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Aging and Disease
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
IGI Global
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Tech Science Press
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Journal of Rheumatology
9 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
|
|
Indiana University School of Medicine
50 publications, 4.72%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
32 publications, 3.02%
|
|
Harvard University
30 publications, 2.83%
|
|
University of Melbourne
27 publications, 2.55%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
24 publications, 2.27%
|
|
Columbia University
22 publications, 2.08%
|
|
University of Michigan
21 publications, 1.98%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
18 publications, 1.7%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
17 publications, 1.61%
|
|
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
16 publications, 1.51%
|
|
Stanford University
14 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
14 publications, 1.32%
|
|
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
14 publications, 1.32%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
13 publications, 1.23%
|
|
Garvan Institute of Medical Research
12 publications, 1.13%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
12 publications, 1.13%
|
|
Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis
12 publications, 1.13%
|
|
University of Sheffield
12 publications, 1.13%
|
|
University of Calgary
12 publications, 1.13%
|
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham
12 publications, 1.13%
|
|
Steno Diabetes Center
11 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
11 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
11 publications, 1.04%
|
|
University of Oxford
10 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Maastricht University Medical Center+
10 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
10 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Indiana University Indianapolis
10 publications, 0.94%
|
|
Aalborg University Hospital
9 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Aalborg University
9 publications, 0.85%
|
|
University of Southampton
9 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
9 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Boston University
9 publications, 0.85%
|
|
University of Toronto
9 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Aarhus University Hospital
8 publications, 0.76%
|
|
McGill University
8 publications, 0.76%
|
|
Purdue University
8 publications, 0.76%
|
|
Erasmus University Medical Center
8 publications, 0.76%
|
|
University of Manitoba
8 publications, 0.76%
|
|
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
8 publications, 0.76%
|
|
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
8 publications, 0.76%
|
|
University of Edinburgh
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Cornell University
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Monash University
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Ohio State University
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Hasselt University
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
McGill University Health Centre
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Minnesota
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Leiden University Medical Center
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
University of Rochester Medical Center
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
7 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Geneva University Hospitals
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Odense University Hospital
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Deakin University
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Northwestern University
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Missouri–Kansas City
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Duke University Hospital
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Brigham and Women's Hospital
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Tufts University
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Rush University Medical Center
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of British Columbia
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Thomas Jefferson University
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Rochester
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Connecticut Health
6 publications, 0.57%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Bar-Ilan University
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
ETH Zurich
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Lausanne University Hospital
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of New South Wales
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Maastricht University
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Queensland
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Adelaide
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Translational Research Institute
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Western Health
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Washington
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Northeastern University
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Bristol
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Medical Center
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Amsterdam University Medical Center
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Emory University
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Ottawa
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
5 publications, 0.47%
|
|
University of Milan
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Aarhus University
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Sorbonne University
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Southern California
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Sydney
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Florence
4 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
|
Indiana University School of Medicine
27 publications, 7.96%
|
|
University of Melbourne
12 publications, 3.54%
|
|
University of Michigan
12 publications, 3.54%
|
|
Harvard University
11 publications, 3.24%
|
|
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
11 publications, 3.24%
|
|
Steno Diabetes Center
9 publications, 2.65%
|
|
Mayo Clinic
8 publications, 2.36%
|
|
University of Calgary
8 publications, 2.36%
|
|
Johns Hopkins University
7 publications, 2.06%
|
|
Stanford University
7 publications, 2.06%
|
|
University of California, San Francisco
7 publications, 2.06%
|
|
University of Pennsylvania
7 publications, 2.06%
|
|
Aarhus University Hospital
6 publications, 1.77%
|
|
McGill University Health Centre
6 publications, 1.77%
|
|
Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis
6 publications, 1.77%
|
|
University of Sheffield
6 publications, 1.77%
|
|
Geneva University Hospitals
5 publications, 1.47%
|
|
Aalborg University
5 publications, 1.47%
|
|
University of Oxford
5 publications, 1.47%
|
|
University of Southampton
5 publications, 1.47%
|
|
Washington University in St. Louis
5 publications, 1.47%
|
|
Massachusetts General Hospital
5 publications, 1.47%
|
|
McGill University
5 publications, 1.47%
|
|
Indiana University Indianapolis
5 publications, 1.47%
|
|
Karolinska Institute
4 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
4 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Aalborg University Hospital
4 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Aarhus University
4 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Maastricht University Medical Center+
4 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Odense University Hospital
4 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Monash University
4 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Queensland
4 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Garvan Institute of Medical Research
4 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Translational Research Institute
4 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Boston University
4 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
4 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Amsterdam University Medical Center
4 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Erasmus University Medical Center
4 publications, 1.18%
|
|
University of Toronto
4 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center
4 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Indiana University Bloomington
4 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Bar-Ilan University
3 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Eindhoven University of Technology
3 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Milan
3 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
3 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
3 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Adelaide
3 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Deakin University
3 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Tufts University
3 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
3 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Vanderbilt University
3 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Hasselt University
3 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Bristol
3 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Paris Cité University
3 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
3 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Leiden University Medical Center
3 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Purdue University
3 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Tokyo
3 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Thomas Jefferson University
3 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Manitoba
3 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Saskatchewan
3 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Rochester Medical Center
3 publications, 0.88%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
3 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
3 publications, 0.88%
|
|
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
3 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Sichuan University
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Lund University
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
ETH Zurich
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Gothenburg
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Skåne University Hospital
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Technische Universität Dresden
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of New South Wales
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Turin
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Maastricht University
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Sorbonne University
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Cornell University
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Eastern Piedmont Amadeo Avogadro
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Auckland
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Monash Health
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Western Health
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Columbia University
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
George Washington University
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Northwestern University
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Virginia Tech
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Duke University
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Washington
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Ohio State University
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Midwestern University
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Rush University Medical Center
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Osaka University
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Marquette University
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of British Columbia
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
University of Porto
2 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
|
USA
|
USA, 664, 62.7%
USA
664 publications, 62.7%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 70, 6.61%
United Kingdom
70 publications, 6.61%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 67, 6.33%
Australia
67 publications, 6.33%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 63, 5.95%
Canada
63 publications, 5.95%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 48, 4.53%
Netherlands
48 publications, 4.53%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 37, 3.49%
Germany
37 publications, 3.49%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 25, 2.36%
Italy
25 publications, 2.36%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 24, 2.27%
Switzerland
24 publications, 2.27%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 23, 2.17%
Denmark
23 publications, 2.17%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 23, 2.17%
Japan
23 publications, 2.17%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 21, 1.98%
Belgium
21 publications, 1.98%
|
France
|
France, 20, 1.89%
France
20 publications, 1.89%
|
China
|
China, 20, 1.89%
China
20 publications, 1.89%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 12, 1.13%
Austria
12 publications, 1.13%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 12, 1.13%
Sweden
12 publications, 1.13%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 11, 1.04%
Israel
11 publications, 1.04%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 9, 0.85%
Brazil
9 publications, 0.85%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 8, 0.76%
Ireland
8 publications, 0.76%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 7, 0.66%
Spain
7 publications, 0.66%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 6, 0.57%
New Zealand
6 publications, 0.57%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 5, 0.47%
Argentina
5 publications, 0.47%
|
India
|
India, 4, 0.38%
India
4 publications, 0.38%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 4, 0.38%
Singapore
4 publications, 0.38%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 4, 0.38%
Czech Republic
4 publications, 0.38%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 3, 0.28%
Portugal
3 publications, 0.28%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 3, 0.28%
Colombia
3 publications, 0.28%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 3, 0.28%
Poland
3 publications, 0.28%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 3, 0.28%
Saudi Arabia
3 publications, 0.28%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 3, 0.28%
Serbia
3 publications, 0.28%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 3, 0.28%
Finland
3 publications, 0.28%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.19%
Chile
2 publications, 0.19%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 2, 0.19%
South Africa
2 publications, 0.19%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.09%
Russia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Gambia
|
Gambia, 1, 0.09%
Gambia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.09%
Greece
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 1, 0.09%
Egypt
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 1, 0.09%
Zimbabwe
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.09%
Malaysia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 1, 0.09%
Slovakia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.09%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.09%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 1, 0.09%
Turkey
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.09%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.09%
|
Show all (13 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
|
|
USA
|
USA, 185, 54.57%
USA
185 publications, 54.57%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 29, 8.55%
Canada
29 publications, 8.55%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 28, 8.26%
Australia
28 publications, 8.26%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 19, 5.6%
United Kingdom
19 publications, 5.6%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 17, 5.01%
Netherlands
17 publications, 5.01%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 15, 4.42%
Denmark
15 publications, 4.42%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 12, 3.54%
Germany
12 publications, 3.54%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 11, 3.24%
Italy
11 publications, 3.24%
|
France
|
France, 10, 2.95%
France
10 publications, 2.95%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 10, 2.95%
Switzerland
10 publications, 2.95%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 10, 2.95%
Japan
10 publications, 2.95%
|
China
|
China, 9, 2.65%
China
9 publications, 2.65%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 8, 2.36%
Sweden
8 publications, 2.36%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 5, 1.47%
Belgium
5 publications, 1.47%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 4, 1.18%
Austria
4 publications, 1.18%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 4, 1.18%
Brazil
4 publications, 1.18%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 4, 1.18%
Israel
4 publications, 1.18%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 3, 0.88%
Colombia
3 publications, 0.88%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 2, 0.59%
Portugal
2 publications, 0.59%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 0.59%
Ireland
2 publications, 0.59%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 2, 0.59%
Spain
2 publications, 0.59%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 2, 0.59%
New Zealand
2 publications, 0.59%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 2, 0.59%
Serbia
2 publications, 0.59%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 0.59%
Czech Republic
2 publications, 0.59%
|
Gambia
|
Gambia, 1, 0.29%
Gambia
1 publication, 0.29%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.29%
Greece
1 publication, 0.29%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 1, 0.29%
Egypt
1 publication, 0.29%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 1, 0.29%
Zimbabwe
1 publication, 0.29%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 1, 0.29%
Poland
1 publication, 0.29%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.29%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.29%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 1, 0.29%
Slovenia
1 publication, 0.29%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 1, 0.29%
Thailand
1 publication, 0.29%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.29%
Finland
1 publication, 0.29%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 1, 0.29%
South Africa
1 publication, 0.29%
|
Show all (4 more) | |
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
|