Moskovsky, Alexander
PhD in Physics and Mathematics
Publications
47
Citations
292
h-index
9
Laboratory of Quantum Chemistry and Molecular Modeling
Senior Researcher
Publications found: 16

Manufacturing sustainable composite building materials: from waste, to the lab, to the community
Agyeman Boateng E., Bilal M., Pandapas C., Singappuli N., Yohay E., Ismael A., Cote D., Krueger R.
Abstract
This paper describes how our team took waste plastic and coconut fibers to create a composite strong enough to be used for roof sheathing in West Africa. Part one details the necessary background and literature review, our research design, and findings from lab work conducted in the summer of 2023. In part two of the paper, we describe a pilot test of reproducing our results outside the lab in a rural Ghanaian community. Through a co-design process, the team worked in a peer-to-peer relationship with community members of Akyem Dwenase in Ghana’s Eastern Region to test the process of transforming waste plastic into roof sheathing using technology designed in Ghana. The project was borne out of a MS project in Science and Technology for Innovation in Global Development and supported by a team of undergraduates who, under the supervision of faculty, worked for seven weeks in Ghana to develop and test the prototype. The paper concludes with areas for future work.

Re-framing and enacting diversity in science education: the case of college chemistry classrooms
Picón R.O.
Abstract
Scholarship about the effectiveness of programs related to promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion in college suggests that increasing the presence of marginalized students does not necessarily result in producing inclusion and a sense of belonging in science. Recruiting and retaining marginalized students in science-related fields and comparing them with students from dominant groups is assimilationist because the presence of different people does not inherently create a diverse school setting. The central goal of this viewpoint paper is to propose a holistic view of diversity at the university level. Particularly, I discuss a conceptual framework that frames diversity as a process that entails inducing, orchestrating, utilizing, valuing, and honoring the heterogeneity of ways of thinking, doing, and being of individuals to learn. To translate commitments to enact diversity in daily teaching practices, specifically in the chemistry classroom, I analyze culturally relevant pedagogy as a productive tool to encourage students and instructors to develop and leverage a robust repertoire of thoughts, practices, and identities to learn disciplinary concepts and solve problems that matter to students. To support the operationalization of diversity in science classrooms in higher education, researchers and practitioners should identify and value the coexistence of different thoughts, practices, and identities in the school to create a safe and intellectually challenging learning setting where thinking, doing, and being different is an asset toward learning.

Making exploratory search engines using qualitative case studies: a mixed method implementation using interviews with Detroit Artisans
Robinson K.P., Garvin M., Eglash R., Robert L., Guzdial M., Bennett A.
Abstract
Search engine algorithms are increasingly subjects of critique, with evidence indicating their role in driving polarization, exclusion, and algorithmic social harms. Many proposed solutions take a top-down approach, with experts proposing bias-corrections. A more participatory approach may be possible, with those made vulnerable by algorithmic unfairness having a voice in how they want to be “found.” By using a mixed methods approach, we sought to develop search engine criteria from the bottom-up. In this project we worked with a group of 16 African American artisanal entrepreneurs in Detroit Michigan, with a majority female and all from low-income communities. Through regular in-depth interviews with select participants, they highlighted their important services, identities and practices. We then used causal set relations with natural language processing to match queries with their qualitative narratives. We refer to this two-step process-- deliberately focusing on social groups with unaddressed needs, and carefully translating narratives to computationally accessible forms--as a “content aware” approach. The resulting content aware search outcomes place themes that participants value, in particular greater relationality, much earlier in the list of results when compared with a standard Web search. More broadly, our use of participatory design with “content awareness” adds evidence to the importance of addressing algorithmic bias by considering who gets to address it; and, that participatory search engine criteria can be modeled as robust linkages between interviews and semantic similarity using causal set relations.

Imagining just futures through interdisciplinary pedagogies: cultivating communities of practice across the sciences and humanities
York E., May C., Breneman D.L., Yanacek H., Klevickis C., Conley S.N.
Abstract
This case study describes an experimental initiative at James Madison University funded by a National Science Foundation grant in Fall 2021 that aimed to support interdisciplinary collaborative pedagogical development related to Science, Technology, and Society (STS) with a particular focus on ethics and justice. The case study argues that creating infrastructure to cultivate and sustain small teaching communities of practice that include faculty from humanities, social sciences, and STEM fields, can support the challenging and necessary work of developing integrated STS-informed pedagogies across the curriculum. A flexible framework is examined through multiple lenses, including perspectives from each faculty participant, representing teaching departments of Biology, World Languages & Cultures, Integrated Science and Technology/Biotechnology, Justice Studies/Disability Studies, and Integrated Science and Technology/Public Interest Technology and Science. Authors provide key insights about what enables and sustains an interdisciplinary community of practice.

Demystifying artificial intelligence for the global public interest: establishing responsible AI for international development through training
Zarei Ardestani Z., Mao E., Krueger R.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a buzzword around the globe. For many, AI was once contained in high-tech labs and has now been released out into the world for the rest of us to use. Generative AI, which is what Microsoft, Apple, and OpenAI have recently offered, is only one version of AI – probably the one with the most ‘curb appeal’. In fact, AI dates to the 1950s and has offered much more banal – by today’s standards – innovations. This case study represents an effort to demystify popular notions of AI and take a first baby step toward developing AI literacy among international development practitioners. We offer two cases of courses that we developed to build appropriate bridges to the future, to show AI is not like the discovery of fire – a gift from the gods – but rather a technology that is a baby step forward in data analytics.

“The 21st century professionalization?”: online education as an instrument for bolstering individual welfare and societal equality
Huet P.
Abstract
Since the start of the last decade of the 20th century, the application of digital technologies with the potential of making substantial contributions to a community’s welfare have led to the creation of the literature of Public Interest Technologies and reinvigorated many areas of focus in the social sciences. A relevant subfield of this literature has been the application of new technologies to education to increase social public benefits. The traditional literature on higher education seems to agree that the expansion of this good throughout a society is desirable because it generates direct and indirect individual gains, as well as aggregate level social benefits in the form of positive externalities. However, some authors have argued that the acquisition of postsecondary education has its own drawbacks: unwanted intellectual influence of instructors on students, barriers to access for students of historically vulnerable sociodemographic groups, as well as students’ perception of a reduced pay-off from going to college. While there have been some indices that online higher education could abate many of these issues, there has been relatively little formal research to test this tool’s impact. Using a quantitative approach, via cross-section and time-series data analysis, the text finds some evidence that online higher education could solve many of higher education’s drawbacks, while also being a feasible approach given the current technological environment of the United States. The text concludes outlining future research using a mixed-methods approach that could be highly valuable to acquire a more comprehensive view and robust evidence of online higher education’s potential of expanding social public benefits.

Can public interest technology serve people who have disabilities?
Gran B., Bryden A.M.
Abstract
Public Interest Technology is an emerging paradigm, scholarly domain, and potential contributor to reducing barriers, mitigating discrimination, and promoting human rights of people who have disabilities. Employing data from individual interviews of people who have experienced spinal cord injury and their support persons, this project identifies obstacles and barriers these people experience when seeking technologies needed for rehabilitation and reintegration. This article discusses these individuals’ experiences in light of how public interest technology may be a game changer for people who have experienced spinal cord injuries.

Black-oriented EdTech and public interest technology: a framework for accessible and ethically designed technology for K-12 students
Campbell S.E.
Abstract
This study explores the intersection of public interest technology (PIT) and K-12 Black-oriented educational technology (EdTech) platforms in addressing educational inequities and racial biases. Despite the increased adoption of EdTech in K-12 settings, it often perpetuates racial biases, marginalizing Black students. Conversely, Black-oriented educational technology has been established to counter the marginalization of Black students by centering Black culture and realities in educational content (Young, P.A. 1999. Roads to travel: a historical look at African American contributions to instructional technology. University of California, Berkeley), emphasizing principles of ethical, accessible, and impactful technology use aligned with PIT. However, research on these digital platforms is limited. This study employs multimodal critical discourse analysis to examine three K-12 Black-oriented platforms – KaiXR, Reconstruction, and TunTimo – developed by Black women, to understand how they address technology inclusion and counteract racial biases in mainstream EdTech.

Examining generative image models amidst privacy regulations
Ismael H.
Abstract
As diffusion models emerge as a new frontier in generative AI, requiring vast image databases as their inputs, the question arises: how should regulators approach policies concerning the collection and utilization of these images? Though generative image models currently interpret the data they scrape as public, regulatory bodies have yet to confirm this as a viable understanding. This paper explores the current public/personal distinction of data as well as the respective legal standards for both categories in both the American and European context. This paper acts as a guide for regulators seeking to understand monopolization and privacy implications of confirming the validity of using open sourced images versus imagining a reality of curated or licensed datasets amidst outrage from artists over a breach of an expectation of collection/use to their artwork. Though arguments have been made regarding using copyright to protect artists, this paper seeks to explore other pathways for regulating generative image models under our current conceptual frameworks of privacy.

Frontmatter
Journal of Integrated Global STEM
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0


Public interest technology and why it’s important to create an outlet for it?
Journal of Integrated Global STEM
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
Quarkume A.Y.


What do college students think about artificial intelligence? We ask them
Cruz Zuniga M., Santrac N., Kwiatkowski A., Abood B.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming different aspects of the economy and society of countries. There are diverse effects when comparing the impact in developed versus developing countries. In the educational sector, efforts to incorporate AI have largely ignored the input from those directly impacted by it. This document presents results from a survey about AI to university students in Latin America. The information presented comes from a survey conducted in November 2023 to college students with ages between 18 and 25 years in four Latin American countries: Mexico, Argentina, Peru, and Ecuador. The results indicate that, in general, youth have a positive view about the potential of AI, though limited knowledge in the topic. Moreover, university students in the region do not want to be passive recipients of AI. They want to participate directly in conversations about this very current topic and have concerns about different aspects of AI implementation in the region. These findings highlight the need for universities, governments, civil society and international organizations and the private sector to work together to create spaces for inclusive dialogue where the youth could directly participate in conversations that crucially matter for their lives.

Towards defining the public interest in technology: lessons from history
Washington A.L., Cheung J.
Abstract
The public interest suggests a singular approach to a social good, but lessons from history illustrate the nuances of sharing open space, transportation networks, and policy mandates. Serving the public exists across a spectrum of possibilities. In this essay, we consider how the emerging field of public interest technology could learn from previous assumptions about who counts as the public and how benefits or harms can be overly concentrated in certain populations. We situate public interest technology as a growing capability of government public service, an institutionalized professional practice like public interest law, as well as a site of critical inquiry. Our definition of the public interest is motivated by a theory of change that recognizes the strength of inclusion. Punctuated with historic and contemporary examples, this essay argues that by acknowledging conflicts of interest and embracing the marginal, public interest technology could build ethical infrastructures to serve all.

Environmental effects of plastic pollution and sustainability: where are we now?
Journal of Integrated Global STEM
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 1
Barrick A., Hoang T.


Trust and Safety work: internal governance of technology risks and harms
Shulruff T.
Abstract
Trust and Safety work mitigates certain social risks and harms of digital technologies. In a landscape that is only slowly establishing regulatory oversight mechanisms, Trust and Safety work performs a type of internal governance by attempting to mitigate disinformation, online harassment, extremism, and other harms accelerated or amplified by technology products and services. With origins in content moderation, Trust and Safety work now also includes product advice for online services and IRL (in real life) products. Attention to Trust and Safety work can complicate a monolithic view of what tech work is and who does it, as well as point to locations for intervention as we seek to promote Public Interest Technology in globally impactful sociotechnical systems.
Found
Total publications
47
Total citations
292
Citations per publication
6.21
Average publications per year
1.88
Average coauthors
3.87
Publications years
1999-2023 (25 years)
h-index
9
i10-index
9
m-index
0.36
o-index
24
g-index
15
w-index
2
Metrics description
h-index
A scientist has an h-index if h of his N publications are cited at least h times each, while the remaining (N - h) publications are cited no more than h times each.
i10-index
The number of the author's publications that received at least 10 links each.
m-index
The researcher's m-index is numerically equal to the ratio of his h-index to the number of years that have passed since the first publication.
o-index
The geometric mean of the h-index and the number of citations of the most cited article of the scientist.
g-index
For a given set of articles, sorted in descending order of the number of citations that these articles received, the g-index is the largest number such that the g most cited articles received (in total) at least g2 citations.
w-index
If w articles of a researcher have at least 10w citations each and other publications are less than 10(w+1) citations, then the researcher's w-index is equal to w.
Top-100
Fields of science
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
|
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
|
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, 11, 23.4%
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
11 publications, 23.4%
|
General Chemistry
|
General Chemistry, 8, 17.02%
General Chemistry
8 publications, 17.02%
|
Computer Science Applications
|
Computer Science Applications, 8, 17.02%
Computer Science Applications
8 publications, 17.02%
|
Hardware and Architecture
|
Hardware and Architecture, 6, 12.77%
Hardware and Architecture
6 publications, 12.77%
|
Computational Theory and Mathematics
|
Computational Theory and Mathematics, 6, 12.77%
Computational Theory and Mathematics
6 publications, 12.77%
|
Software
|
Software, 6, 12.77%
Software
6 publications, 12.77%
|
Information Systems
|
Information Systems, 5, 10.64%
Information Systems
5 publications, 10.64%
|
General Physics and Astronomy
|
General Physics and Astronomy, 4, 8.51%
General Physics and Astronomy
4 publications, 8.51%
|
Computer Networks and Communications
|
Computer Networks and Communications, 4, 8.51%
Computer Networks and Communications
4 publications, 8.51%
|
Condensed Matter Physics
|
Condensed Matter Physics, 3, 6.38%
Condensed Matter Physics
3 publications, 6.38%
|
Catalysis
|
Catalysis, 2, 4.26%
Catalysis
2 publications, 4.26%
|
Organic Chemistry
|
Organic Chemistry, 2, 4.26%
Organic Chemistry
2 publications, 4.26%
|
Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
|
Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 2, 4.26%
Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
2 publications, 4.26%
|
Theoretical Computer Science
|
Theoretical Computer Science, 2, 4.26%
Theoretical Computer Science
2 publications, 4.26%
|
Economics and Econometrics
|
Economics and Econometrics, 2, 4.26%
Economics and Econometrics
2 publications, 4.26%
|
Finance
|
Finance, 2, 4.26%
Finance
2 publications, 4.26%
|
Surfaces, Coatings and Films
|
Surfaces, Coatings and Films, 1, 2.13%
Surfaces, Coatings and Films
1 publication, 2.13%
|
Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
|
Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, 1, 2.13%
Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
1 publication, 2.13%
|
Biochemistry
|
Biochemistry, 1, 2.13%
Biochemistry
1 publication, 2.13%
|
Inorganic Chemistry
|
Inorganic Chemistry, 1, 2.13%
Inorganic Chemistry
1 publication, 2.13%
|
General Energy
|
General Energy, 1, 2.13%
General Energy
1 publication, 2.13%
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
Journals
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
7 publications, 14.89%
|
|
Moscow University Chemistry Bulletin
6 publications, 12.77%
|
|
Communications in Computer and Information Science
5 publications, 10.64%
|
|
Supercomputing Frontiers and Innovations
4 publications, 8.51%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
2 publications, 4.26%
|
|
International Journal of Quantum Chemistry
2 publications, 4.26%
|
|
Voprosy Ekonomiki
2 publications, 4.26%
|
|
International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications
2 publications, 4.26%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Physics
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
Chemical Physics Letters
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Modeling
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry C
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
Chemical Physics
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
Chemistry - A European Journal
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Structure THEOCHEM
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
|
Citing journals
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
|
Journal not defined
|
Journal not defined, 36, 12.33%
Journal not defined
36 citations, 12.33%
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry C
29 citations, 9.93%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Physics
22 citations, 7.53%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
17 citations, 5.82%
|
|
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
13 citations, 4.45%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
9 citations, 3.08%
|
|
Scientific Reports
9 citations, 3.08%
|
|
Computational Materials Science
8 citations, 2.74%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry A
7 citations, 2.4%
|
|
Moscow University Chemistry Bulletin
6 citations, 2.05%
|
|
Communications in Computer and Information Science
5 citations, 1.71%
|
|
Chemical Reviews
5 citations, 1.71%
|
|
International Journal of Quantum Chemistry
5 citations, 1.71%
|
|
Sensors and Actuators, A: Physical
5 citations, 1.71%
|
|
Journal of Computational Chemistry
4 citations, 1.37%
|
|
Chemical Physics Letters
4 citations, 1.37%
|
|
ACS Nano
4 citations, 1.37%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry B
4 citations, 1.37%
|
|
Results in Engineering
3 citations, 1.03%
|
|
Materials Chemistry and Physics
3 citations, 1.03%
|
|
Current Applied Physics
3 citations, 1.03%
|
|
International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications
3 citations, 1.03%
|
|
Molecular Physics
3 citations, 1.03%
|
|
Molecular Systems Design and Engineering
3 citations, 1.03%
|
|
Program systems theory and applications
3 citations, 1.03%
|
|
Biophysical Reviews
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Mendeleev Communications
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
SIAM Journal of Scientific Computing
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Physica E: Low-Dimensional Systems and Nanostructures
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Vestnik Samarskogo Gosudarstvennogo Tekhnicheskogo Universiteta, Seriya Fiziko-Matematicheskie Nauki
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Computers and Fluids
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Voprosy Ekonomiki
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Heat Transfer Engineering
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Heat Transfer Research
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
IEICE Transactions on Electronics
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Nanoscale
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Organometallics
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Accounts of Chemical Research
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Molecules
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Russian Physics Journal
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Part 1: Regular Papers & Short Notes
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
International Journal of Engineering Science
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Materials Research Express
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Chemical Papers
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Parallel Computing
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Tetrahedron Letters
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
GPS Solutions
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Programming and Computer Software
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
European Journal of Mechanics, B/Fluids
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Advances in Quantum Chemistry
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Fluid Dynamics
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
The Analyst
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Structure
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Chemical Science
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Biochemistry
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Energy Conversion and Management
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Nano Letters
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Russian Chemical Bulletin
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Photosynthetica
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Russian Journal of General Chemistry
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Desalination and Water Treatment
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Scientific Computing
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
ACM Transactions on Parallel Computing
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Langmuir
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Computer Physics Communications
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Chemical Society Reviews
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Mathematical Chemistry
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
AEJ - Alexandria Engineering Journal
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
PLoS ONE
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
IEEE Access
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Physical Review B
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Journal of Molecular Structure THEOCHEM
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Advanced Materials Research
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Applied Mechanics and Materials
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Журнал физической химии
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Management and Entrepreneurship in Ukraine the stages of formation and problems of development
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Show all (60 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
Publishers
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
|
Springer Nature
13 publications, 27.66%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
7 publications, 14.89%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
4 publications, 8.51%
|
|
South Ural State University
4 publications, 8.51%
|
|
Wiley
3 publications, 6.38%
|
|
Elsevier
3 publications, 6.38%
|
|
SAGE
2 publications, 4.26%
|
|
NP Voprosy Ekonomiki
2 publications, 4.26%
|
|
AIP Publishing
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
IOP Publishing
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
Organizations from articles
5
10
15
20
25
|
|
Organization not defined
|
Organization not defined, 21, 44.68%
Organization not defined
21 publications, 44.68%
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
20 publications, 42.55%
|
|
Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
5 publications, 10.64%
|
|
William Marsh Rice University
3 publications, 6.38%
|
|
Bach Institute of Biochemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 publications, 4.26%
|
|
![]() Federal Research Centre “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 publications, 4.26%
|
|
Argonne National Laboratory
2 publications, 4.26%
|
|
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
Kirensky Institute of Physics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
Tomsk State University
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
Siberian Federal University
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute"
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
Altai State University
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
Federal Research Center "Krasnoyarsk Science Center" of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
State Research Center of Virology and Biotechnology VECTOR
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
A. K. Ailamazyan Program Systems Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
Xiamen University
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
Renmin University of China
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
Durham University
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
University of Jyväskylä
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
National Tsing Hua University
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
National Pingtung University
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
University of Trento
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
IRCCS Neuromed Mediterranean Neurological Institute
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
Kyungpook National University
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
Hunan University
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
University of Colorado Denver
1 publication, 2.13%
|
|
Show all (5 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
|
Countries from articles
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
|
Russia
|
Russia, 39, 82.98%
Russia
39 publications, 82.98%
|
USA
|
USA, 11, 23.4%
USA
11 publications, 23.4%
|
Country not defined
|
Country not defined, 7, 14.89%
Country not defined
7 publications, 14.89%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 3, 6.38%
Germany
3 publications, 6.38%
|
China
|
China, 2, 4.26%
China
2 publications, 4.26%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 2, 4.26%
Italy
2 publications, 4.26%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 1, 2.13%
United Kingdom
1 publication, 2.13%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 1, 2.13%
Canada
1 publication, 2.13%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 2.13%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 2.13%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 2.13%
Finland
1 publication, 2.13%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 1, 2.13%
Japan
1 publication, 2.13%
|
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
|
Citing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
Organization not defined
|
Organization not defined, 57, 19.52%
Organization not defined
57 citations, 19.52%
|
Sharif University of Technology
22 citations, 7.53%
|
|
Lomonosov Moscow State University
20 citations, 6.85%
|
|
William Marsh Rice University
16 citations, 5.48%
|
|
Iowa State University
12 citations, 4.11%
|
|
Ames National Laboratory
10 citations, 3.42%
|
|
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
8 citations, 2.74%
|
|
Argonne National Laboratory
7 citations, 2.4%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
6 citations, 2.05%
|
|
Australian National University
6 citations, 2.05%
|
|
University at Buffalo, State University of New York
6 citations, 2.05%
|
|
Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
5 citations, 1.71%
|
|
Qingdao University
5 citations, 1.71%
|
|
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
5 citations, 1.71%
|
|
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
4 citations, 1.37%
|
|
Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
4 citations, 1.37%
|
|
ETH Zurich
4 citations, 1.37%
|
|
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
4 citations, 1.37%
|
|
Federal Research Center Computer Science and Control of the Russian Academy of Sciences
3 citations, 1.03%
|
|
Durham University
3 citations, 1.03%
|
|
National University of Singapore
3 citations, 1.03%
|
|
Brookhaven National Laboratory
3 citations, 1.03%
|
|
Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research
3 citations, 1.03%
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Joint Institute for High Temperatures of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
![]() Federal Research Centre “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Voronezh State University
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
A. K. Ailamazyan Program Systems Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Qaemshahr Islamic Azad University
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
University of Mazandaran
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
University of Bologna
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Stony Brook University
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Georgia Institute of technology
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Flinders University
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Los Alamos National Laboratory
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
University of California, Irvine
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
University of Bristol
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
University of Göttingen
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Purdue University
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Cardiff University
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
RIKEN-Institute of Physical and Chemical Research
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
University of Rochester
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
University of Colorado Denver
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
University of New Hampshire
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Masaryk University
2 citations, 0.68%
|
|
N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Bauman Moscow State Technical University
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
ITMO University
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Novosibirsk State University
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Samara National Research University
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Tomsk State University
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
South Ural State University
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Bach Institute of Biochemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Novosibirsk State Technical University
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Volgograd State University
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Dostoevsky Omsk State University
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
State Research Center of Virology and Biotechnology VECTOR
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Moscow State Academy of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology named after K.I. Skryabin
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
L. M. Litvinenko Institute of physical organic and coal chemistry
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Ural State Law University
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Iran University of Science and Technology
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Babol Noshirvani University of Technology
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Bharathiar University
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Islamic Azad University Pharmaceutical Sciences Branch
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
University of Babylon
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
University Putra Malaysia
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
University of Science, Malaysia
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
The MARA Technological University
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Heidelberg University
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Linköping University
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Nanjing Forestry University
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Southeast University
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Nanjing University
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
University of Helsinki
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Beijing University of Chemical Technology
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Renmin University of China
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
National Institute for Materials Science
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Sorbonne University
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
University of Manchester
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Michigan State University
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
University of Trento
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Tokyo Institute of Technology
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
California Institute of Technology
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
University of Insubria
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Institute for the Chemistry of OrganoMetallic Compounds
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Scuola Normale Superiore
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
University of Melbourne
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
University of Queensland
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
University of Adelaide
1 citation, 0.34%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
Citing countries
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
|
USA
|
USA, 73, 25%
USA
73 citations, 25%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 57, 19.52%
Russia
57 citations, 19.52%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 28, 9.59%
Iran
28 citations, 9.59%
|
Country not defined
|
Country not defined, 22, 7.53%
Country not defined
22 citations, 7.53%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 20, 6.85%
Japan
20 citations, 6.85%
|
China
|
China, 15, 5.14%
China
15 citations, 5.14%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 13, 4.45%
Germany
13 citations, 4.45%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 10, 3.42%
United Kingdom
10 citations, 3.42%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 8, 2.74%
Australia
8 citations, 2.74%
|
France
|
France, 6, 2.05%
France
6 citations, 2.05%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 5, 1.71%
Italy
5 citations, 1.71%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 4, 1.37%
Canada
4 citations, 1.37%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 4, 1.37%
Switzerland
4 citations, 1.37%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 4, 1.37%
Sweden
4 citations, 1.37%
|
India
|
India, 3, 1.03%
India
3 citations, 1.03%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 3, 1.03%
Singapore
3 citations, 1.03%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 3, 1.03%
Slovakia
3 citations, 1.03%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 3, 1.03%
Czech Republic
3 citations, 1.03%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 2, 0.68%
Iraq
2 citations, 0.68%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 2, 0.68%
Spain
2 citations, 0.68%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 2, 0.68%
Mexico
2 citations, 0.68%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 2, 0.68%
Netherlands
2 citations, 0.68%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 2, 0.68%
Finland
2 citations, 0.68%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.34%
Ukraine
1 citation, 0.34%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.34%
Estonia
1 citation, 0.34%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 0.34%
Austria
1 citation, 0.34%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 1, 0.34%
Argentina
1 citation, 0.34%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.34%
Belgium
1 citation, 0.34%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 0.34%
Brazil
1 citation, 0.34%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 1, 0.34%
Greece
1 citation, 0.34%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.34%
Denmark
1 citation, 0.34%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.34%
Israel
1 citation, 0.34%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.34%
Ireland
1 citation, 0.34%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 1, 0.34%
Cameroon
1 citation, 0.34%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 1, 0.34%
Malaysia
1 citation, 0.34%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 0.34%
Republic of Korea
1 citation, 0.34%
|
Show all (6 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated daily.
This section displays the profiles of scientists registered on the platform. To display the full list, invite your colleagues to register.