volume 25 issue 9 pages 1157-1174

Development and testing of a general amber force field

Jun-Mei Wang 1
Romain M. Wolf 2
JAMES W. CALDWELL 3
PETER A. KOLLMAN 3
D B Case 4
1
 
The Green Center for Systems Biology
2
 
Novartis
3
 
Encysive Pharmaceuticals Inc., 7000 Fannin, Houston, Texas 77030
4
 
School of Arts and Sciences, Chemistry & Chemical Biology
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2004-04-13
scimago Q1
wos Q2
SJR0.933
CiteScore6.5
Impact factor4.8
ISSN01928651, 1096987X
PubMed ID:  15116359
General Chemistry
Computational Mathematics
Abstract
We describe here a general Amber force field (GAFF) for organic molecules. GAFF is designed to be compatible with existing Amber force fields for proteins and nucleic acids, and has parameters for most organic and pharmaceutical molecules that are composed of H, C, N, O, S, P, and halogens. It uses a simple functional form and a limited number of atom types, but incorporates both empirical and heuristic models to estimate force constants and partial atomic charges. The performance of GAFF in test cases is encouraging. In test I, 74 crystallographic structures were compared to GAFF minimized structures, with a root-mean-square displacement of 0.26 A, which is comparable to that of the Tripos 5.2 force field (0.25 A) and better than those of MMFF 94 and CHARMm (0.47 and 0.44 A, respectively). In test II, gas phase minimizations were performed on 22 nucleic acid base pairs, and the minimized structures and intermolecular energies were compared to MP2/6-31G* results. The RMS of displacements and relative energies were 0.25 A and 1.2 kcal/mol, respectively. These data are comparable to results from Parm99/RESP (0.16 A and 1.18 kcal/mol, respectively), which were parameterized to these base pairs. Test III looked at the relative energies of 71 conformational pairs that were used in development of the Parm99 force field. The RMS error in relative energies (compared to experiment) is about 0.5 kcal/mol. GAFF can be applied to wide range of molecules in an automatic fashion, making it suitable for rational drug design and database searching.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Journal of Physical Chemistry B
950 publications, 5.69%
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
692 publications, 4.14%
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
622 publications, 3.72%
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
620 publications, 3.71%
Journal of Chemical Physics
381 publications, 2.28%
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
364 publications, 2.18%
Molecules
292 publications, 1.75%
Journal of Molecular Liquids
281 publications, 1.68%
Scientific Reports
252 publications, 1.51%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
238 publications, 1.42%
Journal of the American Chemical Society
232 publications, 1.39%
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
227 publications, 1.36%
Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
217 publications, 1.3%
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
206 publications, 1.23%
Journal of Computational Chemistry
205 publications, 1.23%
Journal of Molecular Modeling
203 publications, 1.22%
Nature Communications
203 publications, 1.22%
Journal of Physical Chemistry C
179 publications, 1.07%
PLoS ONE
170 publications, 1.02%
RSC Advances
169 publications, 1.01%
ACS Omega
163 publications, 0.98%
Journal of Physical Chemistry A
153 publications, 0.92%
Biochemistry
149 publications, 0.89%
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
148 publications, 0.89%
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
133 publications, 0.8%
Chemistry - A European Journal
123 publications, 0.74%
Langmuir
120 publications, 0.72%
ACS Catalysis
118 publications, 0.71%
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
106 publications, 0.63%
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000

Publishers

500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
American Chemical Society (ACS)
4627 publications, 27.69%
Elsevier
3305 publications, 19.78%
Springer Nature
1800 publications, 10.77%
Wiley
1555 publications, 9.31%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
1393 publications, 8.34%
MDPI
932 publications, 5.58%
Taylor & Francis
637 publications, 3.81%
AIP Publishing
417 publications, 2.5%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
378 publications, 2.26%
Frontiers Media S.A.
237 publications, 1.42%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
235 publications, 1.41%
Oxford University Press
133 publications, 0.8%
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
80 publications, 0.48%
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
76 publications, 0.45%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
61 publications, 0.37%
IOP Publishing
52 publications, 0.31%
American Physical Society (APS)
44 publications, 0.26%
Pleiades Publishing
43 publications, 0.26%
World Scientific
41 publications, 0.25%
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
38 publications, 0.23%
American Society for Microbiology
34 publications, 0.2%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
29 publications, 0.17%
International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
26 publications, 0.16%
Hindawi Limited
24 publications, 0.14%
SAGE
22 publications, 0.13%
The Royal Society
20 publications, 0.12%
eLife Sciences Publications
20 publications, 0.12%
King Saud University
19 publications, 0.11%
American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
18 publications, 0.11%
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
17k
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Wang J. et al. Development and testing of a general amber force field // Journal of Computational Chemistry. 2004. Vol. 25. No. 9. pp. 1157-1174.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Wang J., Wolf R. M., CALDWELL J. W., KOLLMAN P. A., Case D. B. Development and testing of a general amber force field // Journal of Computational Chemistry. 2004. Vol. 25. No. 9. pp. 1157-1174.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1002/jcc.20035
UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20035
TI - Development and testing of a general amber force field
T2 - Journal of Computational Chemistry
AU - Wang, Jun-Mei
AU - Wolf, Romain M.
AU - CALDWELL, JAMES W.
AU - KOLLMAN, PETER A.
AU - Case, D B
PY - 2004
DA - 2004/04/13
PB - Wiley
SP - 1157-1174
IS - 9
VL - 25
PMID - 15116359
SN - 0192-8651
SN - 1096-987X
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2004_Wang,
author = {Jun-Mei Wang and Romain M. Wolf and JAMES W. CALDWELL and PETER A. KOLLMAN and D B Case},
title = {Development and testing of a general amber force field},
journal = {Journal of Computational Chemistry},
year = {2004},
volume = {25},
publisher = {Wiley},
month = {apr},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20035},
number = {9},
pages = {1157--1174},
doi = {10.1002/jcc.20035}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Wang, Jun-Mei, et al. “Development and testing of a general amber force field.” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 25, no. 9, Apr. 2004, pp. 1157-1174. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20035.