volume 16 issue 8 pages 2577-2595

Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice

Sascha Kraus 1, 2
Matthias Breier 3
Weng Marc Lim 4, 5, 6
Marina Dabić 7, 8
Satish Kumar 5, 9
Dominik Kanbach 10, 11
Debmalya Mukherjee 12
Vincenzo Corvello 13
Juan Pineiro Chousa 14
Eric Liguori 15
Daniel Palacios Marqués 16
FRANCESCO SCHIAVONE 17, 18
Alberto Ferraris 19, 20
Cristina Fernandes 21, 22
JOÃO J. FERREIRA 21
5
 
Faculty of Business, Design and Arts, Swinburne University of Technology, Kuching, Malaysia
10
 
Chair of Strategic Management and Digital Entrepreneurship, HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management, Leipzig, Germany
15
 
Rowan University, Rohrer College of Business, Glassboro, USA
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2022-10-14
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR2.316
CiteScore16.3
Impact factor9.6
ISSN18636683, 18636691
General Business, Management and Accounting
Abstract
Review articles or literature reviews are a critical part of scientific research. While numerous guides on literature reviews exist, these are often limited to the philosophy of review procedures, protocols, and nomenclatures, triggering non-parsimonious reporting and confusion due to overlapping similarities. To address the aforementioned limitations, we adopt a pragmatic approach to demystify and shape the academic practice of conducting literature reviews. We concentrate on the types, focuses, considerations, methods, and contributions of literature reviews as independent, standalone studies. As such, our article serves as an overview that scholars can rely upon to navigate the fundamental elements of literature reviews as standalone and independent studies, without getting entangled in the complexities of review procedures, protocols, and nomenclatures.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Review of Managerial Science
68 publications, 9.97%
Journal of Business Research
27 publications, 3.96%
Global Business and Organizational Excellence
18 publications, 2.64%
British Food Journal
16 publications, 2.35%
European Journal of Innovation Management
14 publications, 2.05%
Journal of Consumer Behaviour
14 publications, 2.05%
Management Review Quarterly
11 publications, 1.61%
Journal of Financial Services Marketing
11 publications, 1.61%
Cogent Business and Management
10 publications, 1.47%
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
9 publications, 1.32%
Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility
8 publications, 1.17%
Technology in Society
8 publications, 1.17%
Sustainability
8 publications, 1.17%
Service Industries Journal
7 publications, 1.03%
Journal of Innovation and Knowledge
7 publications, 1.03%
Business Strategy and the Environment
7 publications, 1.03%
Psychology and Marketing
6 publications, 0.88%
Management Decision
6 publications, 0.88%
International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research
6 publications, 0.88%
Technovation
5 publications, 0.73%
Journal of the Knowledge Economy
5 publications, 0.73%
Australasian Marketing Journal
5 publications, 0.73%
Heliyon
5 publications, 0.73%
International Journal of Consumer Studies
5 publications, 0.73%
Journal of Knowledge Management
5 publications, 0.73%
Remodelling Businesses for Sustainable Development
5 publications, 0.73%
Research in International Business and Finance
4 publications, 0.59%
Activities, Adaptation and Aging
4 publications, 0.59%
Journal of Small Business Management
4 publications, 0.59%
10
20
30
40
50
60
70

Publishers

20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Springer Nature
162 publications, 23.75%
Emerald
135 publications, 19.79%
Elsevier
125 publications, 18.33%
Wiley
79 publications, 11.58%
Taylor & Francis
65 publications, 9.53%
MDPI
27 publications, 3.96%
SAGE
25 publications, 3.67%
IGI Global
8 publications, 1.17%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
8 publications, 1.17%
Frontiers Media S.A.
7 publications, 1.03%
F1000 Research
4 publications, 0.59%
World Scientific
4 publications, 0.59%
Walter de Gruyter
4 publications, 0.59%
IOP Publishing
3 publications, 0.44%
Oxford University Press
3 publications, 0.44%
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
2 publications, 0.29%
JMIR Publications
2 publications, 0.29%
Research Square Platform LLC
1 publication, 0.15%
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
1 publication, 0.15%
IWA Publishing
1 publication, 0.15%
EDP Sciences
1 publication, 0.15%
Pamukkale University
1 publication, 0.15%
Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS)
1 publication, 0.15%
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
1 publication, 0.15%
Academy of Management
1 publication, 0.15%
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
1 publication, 0.15%
RCNi
1 publication, 0.15%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 0.15%
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
1 publication, 0.15%
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
684
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Kraus S. et al. Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice // Review of Managerial Science. 2022. Vol. 16. No. 8. pp. 2577-2595.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Kraus S., Breier M., Lim W. M., Dabić M., Kumar S., Kanbach D., Mukherjee D., Corvello V., Pineiro Chousa J., Liguori E., Palacios Marqués D., SCHIAVONE F., Ferraris A., Fernandes C., FERREIRA J. J. Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice // Review of Managerial Science. 2022. Vol. 16. No. 8. pp. 2577-2595.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8
TI - Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice
T2 - Review of Managerial Science
AU - Kraus, Sascha
AU - Breier, Matthias
AU - Lim, Weng Marc
AU - Dabić, Marina
AU - Kumar, Satish
AU - Kanbach, Dominik
AU - Mukherjee, Debmalya
AU - Corvello, Vincenzo
AU - Pineiro Chousa, Juan
AU - Liguori, Eric
AU - Palacios Marqués, Daniel
AU - SCHIAVONE, FRANCESCO
AU - Ferraris, Alberto
AU - Fernandes, Cristina
AU - FERREIRA, JOÃO J.
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/10/14
PB - Springer Nature
SP - 2577-2595
IS - 8
VL - 16
SN - 1863-6683
SN - 1863-6691
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2022_Kraus,
author = {Sascha Kraus and Matthias Breier and Weng Marc Lim and Marina Dabić and Satish Kumar and Dominik Kanbach and Debmalya Mukherjee and Vincenzo Corvello and Juan Pineiro Chousa and Eric Liguori and Daniel Palacios Marqués and FRANCESCO SCHIAVONE and Alberto Ferraris and Cristina Fernandes and JOÃO J. FERREIRA},
title = {Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice},
journal = {Review of Managerial Science},
year = {2022},
volume = {16},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {oct},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8},
number = {8},
pages = {2577--2595},
doi = {10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Kraus, Sascha, et al. “Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice.” Review of Managerial Science, vol. 16, no. 8, Oct. 2022, pp. 2577-2595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00588-8.