volume 1280 pages 341693

Diverse methods of reducing and confirming false-positive results of loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays: A review

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2023-11-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR1.004
CiteScore10.4
Impact factor6.0
ISSN00032670, 18734324
Biochemistry
Spectroscopy
Analytical Chemistry
Environmental Chemistry
Abstract
Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), a rapid and sensitive isothermal nucleic acid amplification method, is a promising alternative to other molecular amplification techniques due to its superior specificity and sensitivity. However, due to primer dimerization, LAMP results in nonspecific and nontemplate amplification. And during the amplification confirmation process, there is carry-over contamination. These factors can result in false-positive results that overestimate the amount of DNA, preventing accurate detection. This review outlined several techniques for reducing false-positive LAMP results before amplification and confirming false-positive results after amplification. Before the amplification step, DNA polymerase activity can be decreased with organic additives such as dimethyl sulfoxide, betaine, and pullulan to prevent nonspecific amplification. The enzyme uracil-DNA-glycosylase (UDG) can eliminate false-positive results caused by carry-over contamination, and the hot-start effect with gold nanoparticles can reduce nonspecific amplification. When confirming false-positive results using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats, guide RNA accurately detects LAMP amplification, allowing differentiation from nonspecific amplification. By confirming amplification, the colorimetric change in the deoxyribozyme (DNAzyme) formed by the reaction of the G-quadruplex sequence of the LAMP amplicon and hemin can distinguish false-positive results. Lateral flow immunoassay can distinguish false-positive results by accurately recognizing hybridized probes to LAMP amplicons.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical
5 publications, 4.9%
Foods
3 publications, 2.94%
Journal of Virological Methods
3 publications, 2.94%
Analytical Methods
3 publications, 2.94%
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
3 publications, 2.94%
Biosensors
3 publications, 2.94%
Analytica Chimica Acta
3 publications, 2.94%
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
3 publications, 2.94%
Food Control
2 publications, 1.96%
Talanta
2 publications, 1.96%
Analytical Chemistry
2 publications, 1.96%
Frontiers in Microbiology
2 publications, 1.96%
Lab on a Chip
2 publications, 1.96%
ACS Omega
2 publications, 1.96%
Journal of Fish Diseases
2 publications, 1.96%
Microchemical Journal
2 publications, 1.96%
Microsystems and Nanoengineering
2 publications, 1.96%
Science of the Total Environment
1 publication, 0.98%
Agronomy
1 publication, 0.98%
Viruses
1 publication, 0.98%
Journal of Microbiological Methods
1 publication, 0.98%
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
1 publication, 0.98%
Phytomedicine
1 publication, 0.98%
Advanced Science
1 publication, 0.98%
International Dairy Journal
1 publication, 0.98%
Microorganisms
1 publication, 0.98%
Trends in Biotechnology
1 publication, 0.98%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
1 publication, 0.98%
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology
1 publication, 0.98%
1
2
3
4
5

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Elsevier
42 publications, 41.18%
MDPI
13 publications, 12.75%
Springer Nature
11 publications, 10.78%
Wiley
8 publications, 7.84%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
8 publications, 7.84%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
7 publications, 6.86%
Frontiers Media S.A.
6 publications, 5.88%
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 0.98%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 0.98%
Scientific Societies
1 publication, 0.98%
PeerJ
1 publication, 0.98%
ifmbe proceedings
1 publication, 0.98%
American Society for Microbiology
1 publication, 0.98%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1 publication, 0.98%
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
102
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Kim S. et al. Diverse methods of reducing and confirming false-positive results of loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays: A review // Analytica Chimica Acta. 2023. Vol. 1280. p. 341693.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Kim S., Lee S., Kim U., Oh S. Diverse methods of reducing and confirming false-positive results of loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays: A review // Analytica Chimica Acta. 2023. Vol. 1280. p. 341693.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.aca.2023.341693
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2023.341693
TI - Diverse methods of reducing and confirming false-positive results of loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays: A review
T2 - Analytica Chimica Acta
AU - Kim, So-Hee
AU - Lee, Soyoung
AU - Kim, Unji
AU - Oh, Sewook
PY - 2023
DA - 2023/11/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 341693
VL - 1280
PMID - 37858542
SN - 0003-2670
SN - 1873-4324
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2023_Kim,
author = {So-Hee Kim and Soyoung Lee and Unji Kim and Sewook Oh},
title = {Diverse methods of reducing and confirming false-positive results of loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays: A review},
journal = {Analytica Chimica Acta},
year = {2023},
volume = {1280},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {nov},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2023.341693},
pages = {341693},
doi = {10.1016/j.aca.2023.341693}
}