Stakeholders’ Acceptability of Pharmacist-Led Screening in Community Pharmacies: A Systematic Review
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2022-10-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 2.078
CiteScore: 8.0
Impact factor: 4.5
ISSN: 07493797, 18732607
PubMed ID:
35688723
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Epidemiology
Abstract
Introduction
Community pharmacists are among the most accessible healthcare providers. Community pharmacist-led screening may facilitate the early detection of illnesses/medical risk factors, optimizing health outcomes. However, it is important to assess the acceptability of screening services to ensure uptake by key stakeholders. The aim of this review was to explore the acceptability of community pharmacist-led screening by all stakeholders (i.e., patients, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals) and identify the methods used to evaluate the acceptability of screening.Methods
A systematic search was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and Scopus in April 2020 since inception. Studies that explored the acceptability of pharmacist-led screening for any risk factor/medical condition(s) within community pharmacies were included.Results
A total of 44 studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 17 studies identified community pharmacies as appropriate screening locations. Seven studies reported that patients were comfortable with participating in pharmacist-led screening. Eight studies explored acceptability from the perspective of medical practitioners and other healthcare professionals, with 6 reporting high recommendation acceptance rates and/or acceptability of pharmacist-led screening. Barriers to pharmacist-led screening included time and privacy constraints, whereas adequate remuneration was considered an important enabler.Discussion
Community pharmacist-led screening appears to be acceptable to patients, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals. However, no uniform psychometrically sound measure of acceptability was used consistently across studies, rendering comparisons difficult and showing the need for future research exploring the psychometric properties of acceptability measures. Findings, including barriers and enablers to pharmacist-led screening, are important to consider when providing screening services in community pharmacies.Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
2
3
|
|
|
Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA
3 publications, 20%
|
|
|
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
3 publications, 20%
|
|
|
Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
3 publications, 20%
|
|
|
Genes
1 publication, 6.67%
|
|
|
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
1 publication, 6.67%
|
|
|
Canadian Pharmacists Journal
1 publication, 6.67%
|
|
|
World Allergy Organization Journal
1 publication, 6.67%
|
|
|
International Journal of Pharmacy Practice
1 publication, 6.67%
|
|
|
Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice
1 publication, 6.67%
|
|
|
1
2
3
|
Publishers
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
|
|
|
Elsevier
7 publications, 46.67%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
3 publications, 20%
|
|
|
MDPI
1 publication, 6.67%
|
|
|
Wiley
1 publication, 6.67%
|
|
|
SAGE
1 publication, 6.67%
|
|
|
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 6.67%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 6.67%
|
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
15
Total citations:
15
Citations from 2024:
11
(73.33%)
The most citing journal
Citations in journal:
3
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
El-Den S. et al. Stakeholders’ Acceptability of Pharmacist-Led Screening in Community Pharmacies: A Systematic Review // American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2022. Vol. 63. No. 4. pp. 636-646.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
El-Den S., Lee Y. L. E., Gide D. N., O’Reilly C. Stakeholders’ Acceptability of Pharmacist-Led Screening in Community Pharmacies: A Systematic Review // American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2022. Vol. 63. No. 4. pp. 636-646.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.04.023
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2022.04.023
TI - Stakeholders’ Acceptability of Pharmacist-Led Screening in Community Pharmacies: A Systematic Review
T2 - American Journal of Preventive Medicine
AU - El-Den, Sarira
AU - Lee, Yee Lam Elim
AU - Gide, Duha N.
AU - O’Reilly, Carole
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/10/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 636-646
IS - 4
VL - 63
PMID - 35688723
SN - 0749-3797
SN - 1873-2607
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2022_El-Den,
author = {Sarira El-Den and Yee Lam Elim Lee and Duha N. Gide and Carole O’Reilly},
title = {Stakeholders’ Acceptability of Pharmacist-Led Screening in Community Pharmacies: A Systematic Review},
journal = {American Journal of Preventive Medicine},
year = {2022},
volume = {63},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {oct},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2022.04.023},
number = {4},
pages = {636--646},
doi = {10.1016/j.amepre.2022.04.023}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
El-Den, Sarira, et al. “Stakeholders’ Acceptability of Pharmacist-Led Screening in Community Pharmacies: A Systematic Review.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 63, no. 4, Oct. 2022, pp. 636-646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2022.04.023.