volume 59 pages 139-147

Comparison of methods to evaluate bacterial contact-killing materials

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2017-09-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR2.007
CiteScore17.8
Impact factor9.6
ISSN17427061, 18787568
Biochemistry
Molecular Biology
General Medicine
Biotechnology
Biomaterials
Biomedical Engineering
Abstract
Cationic surfaces with alkylated quaternary-ammonium groups kill adhering bacteria upon contact by membrane disruption and are considered increasingly promising as a non-antibiotic based way to eradicate bacteria adhering to surfaces. However, reliable in vitro evaluation methods for bacterial contact-killing surfaces do not yet exist. More importantly, results of different evaluation methods are often conflicting. Therefore, we compared five methods to evaluate contact-killing surfaces. To this end, we have copolymerized quaternary-ammonium groups into diurethane dimethacrylate/glycerol dimethacrylate (UDMA/GDMA) and determined contact-killing efficacies against five different Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains. Spray-coating bacteria from an aerosol onto contact-killing surfaces followed by air-drying as well as ASTM E2149-13a (American Society for Testing and Materials) were found unsuitable, while the PetrifilmĀ® system and JIS Z 2801 (Japanese Industrial Standards) were found to be excellent methods to evaluate bacterial contact-killing surfaces. It is recommended however, that these methods be used in combination with a zone of inhibition on agar assay to exclude that leakage of antimicrobials from the material interferes with the contact-killing ability of the surface.Bacterial adhesion to surfaces of biomaterials implants can be life-threatening. Antimicrobials to treat biomaterial-associated infections often fail due to the bacterial biofilm-mode-of-growth or are ineffective due to antibiotic-resistance of causative organisms. Positively-charged, quaternized surfaces can kill bacteria upon contact and are promising as a non-antibiotic-based treatment of biomaterial-associated infections. Reliable methods to determine efficacies of contact-killing surfaces are lacking, however. Here, we show that three out of five methods compared, including an established ASTM, are unsuitable. Methods found suitable should be used in combination with a zone-of-inhibition-assay to establish absence of antimicrobial leaching, potentially interfering with contact-killing. Identification of suitable assays for evaluating bacterial contact-killing will greatly assist this emerging field as an alternative for antibiotic-based treatment of biomaterial-associated-infections.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
Langmuir
4 publications, 5.26%
Materials Science and Engineering C
3 publications, 3.95%
Acta Biomaterialia
3 publications, 3.95%
Biointerphases
2 publications, 2.63%
Antibiotics
2 publications, 2.63%
Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
2 publications, 2.63%
Food Hydrocolloids
2 publications, 2.63%
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
2 publications, 2.63%
ACS applied materials & interfaces
2 publications, 2.63%
ACS Applied Bio Materials
2 publications, 2.63%
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
2 publications, 2.63%
Journal of Dental Research
1 publication, 1.32%
Journal of Biomaterials Applications
1 publication, 1.32%
Materials
1 publication, 1.32%
Nanomaterials
1 publication, 1.32%
Frontiers in Microbiology
1 publication, 1.32%
Frontiers in Chemistry
1 publication, 1.32%
Der Orthopade
1 publication, 1.32%
Journal of Microbiological Methods
1 publication, 1.32%
Materials Today Bio
1 publication, 1.32%
Progress in Materials Science
1 publication, 1.32%
Materials Today: Proceedings
1 publication, 1.32%
Journal of Molecular Structure
1 publication, 1.32%
Dental Materials
1 publication, 1.32%
Advances in Colloid and Interface Science
1 publication, 1.32%
MethodsX
1 publication, 1.32%
Journal of Materials Science and Technology
1 publication, 1.32%
Biotechnology Advances
1 publication, 1.32%
Macromolecular Bioscience
1 publication, 1.32%
1
2
3
4

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Elsevier
31 publications, 40.79%
American Chemical Society (ACS)
11 publications, 14.47%
MDPI
8 publications, 10.53%
Wiley
5 publications, 6.58%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
3 publications, 3.95%
American Society for Microbiology
3 publications, 3.95%
American Vacuum Society
2 publications, 2.63%
SAGE
2 publications, 2.63%
Frontiers Media S.A.
2 publications, 2.63%
Springer Nature
2 publications, 2.63%
SciELO
1 publication, 1.32%
National Institute of Industrial Health
1 publication, 1.32%
Pleiades Publishing
1 publication, 1.32%
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 1.32%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1 publication, 1.32%
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 1.32%
OOO Zhurnal "Mendeleevskie Soobshcheniya"
1 publication, 1.32%
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
76
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Van De Lagemaat M. et al. Comparison of methods to evaluate bacterial contact-killing materials // Acta Biomaterialia. 2017. Vol. 59. pp. 139-147.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Van De Lagemaat M., Grotenhuis A., van de Belt-Gritter B., Roest S., Loontjens T., Busscher H. J., Ren Q., Ren Y. Comparison of methods to evaluate bacterial contact-killing materials // Acta Biomaterialia. 2017. Vol. 59. pp. 139-147.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.06.042
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.06.042
TI - Comparison of methods to evaluate bacterial contact-killing materials
T2 - Acta Biomaterialia
AU - Van De Lagemaat, Marieke
AU - Grotenhuis, Arjen
AU - van de Belt-Gritter, Betsy
AU - Roest, Steven
AU - Loontjens, Ton
AU - Busscher, Henk J.
AU - Ren, Qun
AU - Ren, Yijin
PY - 2017
DA - 2017/09/01
PB - Elsevier
SP - 139-147
VL - 59
PMID - 28666886
SN - 1742-7061
SN - 1878-7568
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2017_Van De Lagemaat,
author = {Marieke Van De Lagemaat and Arjen Grotenhuis and Betsy van de Belt-Gritter and Steven Roest and Ton Loontjens and Henk J. Busscher and Qun Ren and Yijin Ren},
title = {Comparison of methods to evaluate bacterial contact-killing materials},
journal = {Acta Biomaterialia},
year = {2017},
volume = {59},
publisher = {Elsevier},
month = {sep},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.06.042},
pages = {139--147},
doi = {10.1016/j.actbio.2017.06.042}
}