том 109 издание 5 страницы 785-794

Plasma total homocysteine status of vegetarians compared with omnivores: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Тип публикацииJournal Article
Дата публикации2013-01-08
SCImago Q1
WOS Q2
БС1
SJR0.912
CiteScore6.8
Impact factor3.1
ISSN00071145, 14752662
Medicine (miscellaneous)
Nutrition and Dietetics
Краткое описание

There is strong evidence indicating that elevated plasma total homocysteine (tHcy) levels are a major independent biomarker and/or a contributor to chronic conditions, such as CVD. A deficiency of vitamin B12can elevate homocysteine. Vegetarians are a group of the population who are potentially at greater risk of vitamin B12deficiency than omnivores. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to appraise a range of studies that compared the homocysteine and vitamin B12levels of vegetarians and omnivores. The search methods employed identified 443 entries, from which, by screening using set inclusion and exclusion criteria, six eligible cohort case studies and eleven cross-sectional studies from 1999 to 2010 were revealed, which compared concentrations of plasma tHcy and serum vitamin B12of omnivores, lactovegetarians or lacto-ovovegetarians and vegans. Of the identified seventeen studies (3230 participants), only two studies reported that vegan concentrations of plasma tHcy and serum vitamin B12did not differ from omnivores. The present study confirmed that an inverse relationship exists between plasma tHcy and serum vitamin B12, from which it can be concluded that the usual dietary source of vitamin B12is animal products and those who choose to omit or restrict these products are destined to become vitamin B12deficient. At present, the available supplement, which is usually used for fortification of food, is the unreliable cyanocobalamin. A well-designed study is needed to investigate a reliable and suitable supplement to normalise the elevated plasma tHcy of a high majority of vegetarians. This would fill the gaps in the present nutritional scientific knowledge.

Для доступа к списку цитирований публикации необходимо авторизоваться.

Топ-30

Журналы

2
4
6
8
10
Nutrients
10 публикаций, 10.87%
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
4 публикации, 4.35%
Medecine des Maladies Metaboliques
3 публикации, 3.26%
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
3 публикации, 3.26%
Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
3 публикации, 3.26%
Sustainability
2 публикации, 2.17%
Foods
2 публикации, 2.17%
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
2 публикации, 2.17%
PLoS ONE
2 публикации, 2.17%
Clinical Nutrition
2 публикации, 2.17%
Nutrition Reviews
2 публикации, 2.17%
Frontiers in Nutrition
2 публикации, 2.17%
Nutrition and Healthy Aging
1 публикация, 1.09%
Medical Principles and Practice
1 публикация, 1.09%
Nutrition Today
1 публикация, 1.09%
Medicine (United States)
1 публикация, 1.09%
Coronary Artery Disease
1 публикация, 1.09%
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
1 публикация, 1.09%
SpringerPlus
1 публикация, 1.09%
Indian Journal of Pediatrics
1 публикация, 1.09%
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
1 публикация, 1.09%
Nutrition Journal
1 публикация, 1.09%
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
1 публикация, 1.09%
Behavioural Brain Research
1 публикация, 1.09%
Ageing Research Reviews
1 публикация, 1.09%
Food Chemistry
1 публикация, 1.09%
Advances in Nutrition
1 публикация, 1.09%
Global Food Security
1 публикация, 1.09%
Research in Veterinary Science
1 публикация, 1.09%
2
4
6
8
10

Издатели

5
10
15
20
25
30
Elsevier
27 публикаций, 29.35%
MDPI
17 публикаций, 18.48%
Springer Nature
9 публикаций, 9.78%
Taylor & Francis
8 публикаций, 8.7%
Cambridge University Press
5 публикаций, 5.43%
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
4 публикации, 4.35%
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
3 публикации, 3.26%
Wiley
3 публикации, 3.26%
Oxford University Press
3 публикации, 3.26%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2 публикации, 2.17%
Frontiers Media S.A.
2 публикации, 2.17%
IOS Press
1 публикация, 1.09%
S. Karger AG
1 публикация, 1.09%
American Society for Nutrition
1 публикация, 1.09%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
1 публикация, 1.09%
De Gruyter Brill
1 публикация, 1.09%
OpenEdition
1 публикация, 1.09%
IntechOpen
1 публикация, 1.09%
SAGE
1 публикация, 1.09%
Brieflands
1 публикация, 1.09%
5
10
15
20
25
30
  • Мы не учитываем публикации, у которых нет DOI.
  • Статистика публикаций обновляется еженедельно.

Вы ученый?

Создайте профиль, чтобы получать персональные рекомендации коллег, конференций и новых статей.
 Войти с ORCID
Метрики
92
Поделиться
Цитировать
ГОСТ |
Цитировать
Obersby D. et al. Plasma total homocysteine status of vegetarians compared with omnivores: a systematic review and meta-analysis // British Journal of Nutrition. 2013. Vol. 109. No. 5. pp. 785-794.
ГОСТ со всеми авторами (до 50) Скопировать
Obersby D., Chappell D. C., Dunnett A., Tsiami A. A. Plasma total homocysteine status of vegetarians compared with omnivores: a systematic review and meta-analysis // British Journal of Nutrition. 2013. Vol. 109. No. 5. pp. 785-794.
RIS |
Цитировать
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1017/s000711451200520x
UR - https://doi.org/10.1017/s000711451200520x
TI - Plasma total homocysteine status of vegetarians compared with omnivores: a systematic review and meta-analysis
T2 - British Journal of Nutrition
AU - Obersby, Derek
AU - Chappell, David C.
AU - Dunnett, Andrew
AU - Tsiami, Amalia A
PY - 2013
DA - 2013/01/08
PB - Cambridge University Press
SP - 785-794
IS - 5
VL - 109
PMID - 23298782
SN - 0007-1145
SN - 1475-2662
ER -
BibTex |
Цитировать
BibTex (до 50 авторов) Скопировать
@article{2013_Obersby,
author = {Derek Obersby and David C. Chappell and Andrew Dunnett and Amalia A Tsiami},
title = {Plasma total homocysteine status of vegetarians compared with omnivores: a systematic review and meta-analysis},
journal = {British Journal of Nutrition},
year = {2013},
volume = {109},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
month = {jan},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1017/s000711451200520x},
number = {5},
pages = {785--794},
doi = {10.1017/s000711451200520x}
}
MLA
Цитировать
Obersby, Derek, et al. “Plasma total homocysteine status of vegetarians compared with omnivores: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 109, no. 5, Jan. 2013, pp. 785-794. https://doi.org/10.1017/s000711451200520x.
Ошибка в публикации?