volume 8 issue 9 pages 3257-3273

Optimization of the Additive CHARMM All-Atom Protein Force Field Targeting Improved Sampling of the Backbone ϕ, ψ and Side-Chain χ1 and χ2 Dihedral Angles

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2012-08-06
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR1.482
CiteScore9.8
Impact factor5.5
ISSN15499618, 15499626
PubMed ID:  23341755
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
Computer Science Applications
Abstract
While the quality of the current CHARMM22/CMAP additive force field for proteins has been demonstrated in a large number of applications, limitations in the model with respect to the equilibrium between the sampling of helical and extended conformations in folding simulations have been noted. To overcome this, as well as make other improvements in the model, we present a combination of refinements that should result in enhanced accuracy in simulations of proteins. The common (non Gly, Pro) backbone CMAP potential has been refined against experimental solution NMR data for weakly structured peptides, resulting in a rebalancing of the energies of the α-helix and extended regions of the Ramachandran map, correcting the α-helical bias of CHARMM22/CMAP. The Gly and Pro CMAPs have been refitted to more accurate quantum-mechanical energy surfaces. Side-chain torsion parameters have been optimized by fitting to backbone-dependent quantum-mechanical energy surfaces, followed by additional empirical optimization targeting NMR scalar couplings for unfolded proteins. A comprehensive validation of the revised force field was then performed against data not used to guide parametrization: (i) comparison of simulations of eight proteins in their crystal environments with crystal structures; (ii) comparison with backbone scalar couplings for weakly structured peptides; (iii) comparison with NMR residual dipolar couplings and scalar couplings for both backbone and side-chains in folded proteins; (iv) equilibrium folding of mini-proteins. The results indicate that the revised CHARMM 36 parameters represent an improved model for the modeling and simulation studies of proteins, including studies of protein folding, assembly and functionally relevant conformational changes.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

50
100
150
200
250
300
Journal of Physical Chemistry B
272 publications, 6.34%
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
181 publications, 4.22%
Nature Communications
148 publications, 3.45%
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
134 publications, 3.13%
Biophysical Journal
128 publications, 2.99%
Scientific Reports
105 publications, 2.45%
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
100 publications, 2.33%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
84 publications, 1.96%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
74 publications, 1.73%
Journal of Chemical Physics
73 publications, 1.7%
Journal of Biological Chemistry
70 publications, 1.63%
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
67 publications, 1.56%
eLife
67 publications, 1.56%
Molecules
57 publications, 1.33%
Journal of Computational Chemistry
55 publications, 1.28%
bioRxiv
54 publications, 1.26%
PLoS ONE
51 publications, 1.19%
Journal of Molecular Liquids
49 publications, 1.14%
Biochemistry
48 publications, 1.12%
Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics
48 publications, 1.12%
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Biomembranes
44 publications, 1.03%
Journal of the American Chemical Society
42 publications, 0.98%
Science advances
39 publications, 0.91%
ACS Omega
37 publications, 0.86%
Structure
37 publications, 0.86%
PLoS Computational Biology
34 publications, 0.79%
Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
32 publications, 0.75%
Methods in Molecular Biology
32 publications, 0.75%
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
31 publications, 0.72%
50
100
150
200
250
300

Publishers

100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
American Chemical Society (ACS)
957 publications, 22.32%
Elsevier
784 publications, 18.29%
Springer Nature
546 publications, 12.74%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
448 publications, 10.45%
Wiley
258 publications, 6.02%
MDPI
238 publications, 5.55%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
210 publications, 4.9%
Taylor & Francis
99 publications, 2.31%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
92 publications, 2.15%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
84 publications, 1.96%
AIP Publishing
80 publications, 1.87%
eLife Sciences Publications
67 publications, 1.56%
Frontiers Media S.A.
57 publications, 1.33%
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
57 publications, 1.33%
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
56 publications, 1.31%
Oxford University Press
42 publications, 0.98%
Rockefeller University Press
21 publications, 0.49%
Pleiades Publishing
13 publications, 0.3%
American Society for Microbiology
13 publications, 0.3%
Portland Press
12 publications, 0.28%
IOP Publishing
10 publications, 0.23%
American Physical Society (APS)
8 publications, 0.19%
International Union of Crystallography (IUCr)
7 publications, 0.16%
World Scientific
7 publications, 0.16%
American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
6 publications, 0.14%
SAGE
6 publications, 0.14%
American Society for Clinical Investigation
5 publications, 0.12%
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
5 publications, 0.12%
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
5 publications, 0.12%
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
4.3k
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Best R. T. et al. Optimization of the Additive CHARMM All-Atom Protein Force Field Targeting Improved Sampling of the Backbone ϕ, ψ and Side-Chain χ1 and χ2 Dihedral Angles // Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 2012. Vol. 8. No. 9. pp. 3257-3273.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Best R. T., Zhu X., Shim J., Lopes P. L. E. S., Mittal J., Feig M., MacKerell A. D. Optimization of the Additive CHARMM All-Atom Protein Force Field Targeting Improved Sampling of the Backbone ϕ, ψ and Side-Chain χ1 and χ2 Dihedral Angles // Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 2012. Vol. 8. No. 9. pp. 3257-3273.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1021/ct300400x
UR - https://doi.org/10.1021/ct300400x
TI - Optimization of the Additive CHARMM All-Atom Protein Force Field Targeting Improved Sampling of the Backbone ϕ, ψ and Side-Chain χ1 and χ2 Dihedral Angles
T2 - Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
AU - Best, Robert T.
AU - Zhu, Xiao
AU - Shim, Jihyun
AU - Lopes, Pedro L. e S.
AU - Mittal, Jeetain
AU - Feig, Michael
AU - MacKerell, Alexander D.
PY - 2012
DA - 2012/08/06
PB - American Chemical Society (ACS)
SP - 3257-3273
IS - 9
VL - 8
PMID - 23341755
SN - 1549-9618
SN - 1549-9626
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2012_Best,
author = {Robert T. Best and Xiao Zhu and Jihyun Shim and Pedro L. e S. Lopes and Jeetain Mittal and Michael Feig and Alexander D. MacKerell},
title = {Optimization of the Additive CHARMM All-Atom Protein Force Field Targeting Improved Sampling of the Backbone ϕ, ψ and Side-Chain χ1 and χ2 Dihedral Angles},
journal = {Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation},
year = {2012},
volume = {8},
publisher = {American Chemical Society (ACS)},
month = {aug},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/ct300400x},
number = {9},
pages = {3257--3273},
doi = {10.1021/ct300400x}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Best, Robert T., et al. “Optimization of the Additive CHARMM All-Atom Protein Force Field Targeting Improved Sampling of the Backbone ϕ, ψ and Side-Chain χ1 and χ2 Dihedral Angles.” Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, vol. 8, no. 9, Aug. 2012, pp. 3257-3273. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct300400x.