volume 20 issue 11 pages 7320-7327

Evaluating the Predictive Abilities of Protocols Based on Hydrogen-Bond Propensity, Molecular Complementarity, and Hydrogen-Bond Energy for Cocrystal Screening

Mariusz Krawiec 2
Dongyue Xin 2
2
 
Material and Analytical Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, Connecticut 06877, United States
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2020-09-15
scimago Q2
wos Q1
SJR0.633
CiteScore5.6
Impact factor3.4
ISSN15287483, 15287505
General Chemistry
Condensed Matter Physics
General Materials Science
Abstract
The successful synthesis of multi-component molecular solids such as cocrystals typically requires a large number of experiments before a new solid form of the target compound emerges with improved bulk properties. In order to focus and guide cocrystal synthesis we evaluated three different protocols (individually and combined) for predicting whether a cocrystal would form dur-ing attempted cocrystallizations between six active pharmaceutical ingredients and 42 potential coformers of the general interest. A blend of different methods gave the best results and a combination of protocols based on molecular complementarity (MC) and hydrogen-bond propensity (HBP), correctly predicted the outcome of 81% of experiments, whereas a combination of MC, and a protocol based on hydrogen-bond energies (HBE) delivered an overall success rate of 77% (including true positives and true negatives). The ease with which these methods can be implemented prior to large-scale experimental cocrystal screening, means that the choice of potential coformers may be narrowed effectively and the experimental search can be substantially optimized.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Crystal Growth and Design
15 publications, 30.61%
Pharmaceutics
3 publications, 6.12%
Journal of Molecular Structure
3 publications, 6.12%
Crystals
2 publications, 4.08%
Molecules
1 publication, 2.04%
Solids
1 publication, 2.04%
Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics
1 publication, 2.04%
Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy
1 publication, 2.04%
Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology
1 publication, 2.04%
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
1 publication, 2.04%
Drug Discovery Today
1 publication, 2.04%
Journal of the American Chemical Society
1 publication, 2.04%
European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics
1 publication, 2.04%
Heliyon
1 publication, 2.04%
Advanced Functional Materials
1 publication, 2.04%
European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
1 publication, 2.04%
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
1 publication, 2.04%
RSC Mechanochemistry
1 publication, 2.04%
Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems
1 publication, 2.04%
Angewandte Chemie - International Edition
1 publication, 2.04%
Angewandte Chemie
1 publication, 2.04%
Chemistry - A European Journal
1 publication, 2.04%
International Journal of Pharmaceutics
1 publication, 2.04%
Chinese Chemical Letters
1 publication, 2.04%
Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A
1 publication, 2.04%
Molecular Diversity
1 publication, 2.04%
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B
1 publication, 2.04%
AAPS PharmSciTech
1 publication, 2.04%
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data
1 publication, 2.04%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16

Publishers

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
American Chemical Society (ACS)
18 publications, 36.73%
Elsevier
14 publications, 28.57%
MDPI
8 publications, 16.33%
Wiley
4 publications, 8.16%
Springer Nature
2 publications, 4.08%
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 2.04%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
1 publication, 2.04%
Pleiades Publishing
1 publication, 2.04%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
49
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Sarkar N. et al. Evaluating the Predictive Abilities of Protocols Based on Hydrogen-Bond Propensity, Molecular Complementarity, and Hydrogen-Bond Energy for Cocrystal Screening // Crystal Growth and Design. 2020. Vol. 20. No. 11. pp. 7320-7327.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Sarkar N., Gonnella N. C., Krawiec M., Xin D., Aakeröy C. Evaluating the Predictive Abilities of Protocols Based on Hydrogen-Bond Propensity, Molecular Complementarity, and Hydrogen-Bond Energy for Cocrystal Screening // Crystal Growth and Design. 2020. Vol. 20. No. 11. pp. 7320-7327.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1021/acs.cgd.0c00987
UR - https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.0c00987
TI - Evaluating the Predictive Abilities of Protocols Based on Hydrogen-Bond Propensity, Molecular Complementarity, and Hydrogen-Bond Energy for Cocrystal Screening
T2 - Crystal Growth and Design
AU - Sarkar, Nandini
AU - Gonnella, Nina C
AU - Krawiec, Mariusz
AU - Xin, Dongyue
AU - Aakeröy, Christer
PY - 2020
DA - 2020/09/15
PB - American Chemical Society (ACS)
SP - 7320-7327
IS - 11
VL - 20
SN - 1528-7483
SN - 1528-7505
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2020_Sarkar,
author = {Nandini Sarkar and Nina C Gonnella and Mariusz Krawiec and Dongyue Xin and Christer Aakeröy},
title = {Evaluating the Predictive Abilities of Protocols Based on Hydrogen-Bond Propensity, Molecular Complementarity, and Hydrogen-Bond Energy for Cocrystal Screening},
journal = {Crystal Growth and Design},
year = {2020},
volume = {20},
publisher = {American Chemical Society (ACS)},
month = {sep},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.0c00987},
number = {11},
pages = {7320--7327},
doi = {10.1021/acs.cgd.0c00987}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Sarkar, Nandini, et al. “Evaluating the Predictive Abilities of Protocols Based on Hydrogen-Bond Propensity, Molecular Complementarity, and Hydrogen-Bond Energy for Cocrystal Screening.” Crystal Growth and Design, vol. 20, no. 11, Sep. 2020, pp. 7320-7327. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.0c00987.