volume 132 issue 10 pages 104701

Density functional study of CO and NO adsorption on Ni-doped MgO(100)

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2010-03-09
scimago Q1
wos Q2
SJR0.819
CiteScore5.3
Impact factor3.1
ISSN00219606, 10897690
PubMed ID:  20232978
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
General Physics and Astronomy
Abstract

The adsorption of small molecules such as NO or CO on surfaces of magnetic oxides containing transition metals is difficult to model by current density functional approximations. Two such oxides are NiO(100) and Ni-doped MgO(100). Here we compare the results of a theoretical model of the Ni-doped MgO(100) surface with experimental results on NiO(100), which introduces some uncertainty into a quantitative theory-experiment comparison. In the present work, we tested seven meta-GGA and hybrid metafunctionals, in particular, three developed by the Minnesota group (M05, M06-L, and M06), and TPSS, TPSSh, TPSSKCIS, and B1B95; six GGA functionals, including BP86, PBE, and four other functionals that are modifications of PBE (PBEsol, SOGGA, revPBE, and RPBE); five hybrid GGA functionals (B3LYP, PBE0, B97–2, B97–3, and MPWLYP1M); and one unconventional functional of the generalized gradient type with scaled correlation called MOHLYP. The Minnesota meta-GGA functionals were found in the past to be very good choices when transition metal atoms were present; the other functionals chosen are a selection from the most currently used and most promising sets of functionals for bulk solids and surfaces and for transition metals. The difficulty is due to the charge transfer between open shells in the case of NO and to the weak character of the interaction in the case of CO. It is shown that the M06 hybrid meta functional applied to NO or CO on a model of the Ni-doped MgO(100) surface is able to provide a good description of both adsorbate geometries and binding energies. The M06 vibrational frequency shifts are more accurate than for other functionals, but there is still room for improvement.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
6 publications, 11.32%
Journal of Physical Chemistry C
4 publications, 7.55%
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
4 publications, 7.55%
Chemical Reviews
3 publications, 5.66%
Journal of Molecular Modeling
2 publications, 3.77%
Computational and Theoretical Chemistry
2 publications, 3.77%
Surface Science
2 publications, 3.77%
Journal of the American Chemical Society
2 publications, 3.77%
ACS Catalysis
2 publications, 3.77%
RSC Advances
2 publications, 3.77%
ACS Central Science
1 publication, 1.89%
AIP Advances
1 publication, 1.89%
Physical Review B
1 publication, 1.89%
Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces and Films
1 publication, 1.89%
Materials
1 publication, 1.89%
Catalysis Letters
1 publication, 1.89%
Polymer Bulletin
1 publication, 1.89%
Theoretical Chemistry Accounts
1 publication, 1.89%
Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing
1 publication, 1.89%
Physica Scripta
1 publication, 1.89%
Journal of Computational Science
1 publication, 1.89%
Materials Chemistry and Physics
1 publication, 1.89%
Applied Surface Science
1 publication, 1.89%
Computational Materials Science
1 publication, 1.89%
Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering
1 publication, 1.89%
Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry
1 publication, 1.89%
Journal of Physical Chemistry A
1 publication, 1.89%
Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
1 publication, 1.89%
New Journal of Chemistry
1 publication, 1.89%
Chemical Society Reviews
1 publication, 1.89%
1
2
3
4
5
6

Publishers

5
10
15
20
American Chemical Society (ACS)
20 publications, 37.74%
Elsevier
9 publications, 16.98%
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
8 publications, 15.09%
Springer Nature
7 publications, 13.21%
Wiley
2 publications, 3.77%
AIP Publishing
1 publication, 1.89%
American Physical Society (APS)
1 publication, 1.89%
American Vacuum Society
1 publication, 1.89%
MDPI
1 publication, 1.89%
IOP Publishing
1 publication, 1.89%
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 1.89%
Walter de Gruyter
1 publication, 1.89%
5
10
15
20
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
53
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Valero R. et al. Density functional study of CO and NO adsorption on Ni-doped MgO(100) // Journal of Chemical Physics. 2010. Vol. 132. No. 10. p. 104701.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Valero R., Gomes J. R., Truhlar D. G., ILLAS F. Density functional study of CO and NO adsorption on Ni-doped MgO(100) // Journal of Chemical Physics. 2010. Vol. 132. No. 10. p. 104701.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1063/1.3340506
UR - https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3340506
TI - Density functional study of CO and NO adsorption on Ni-doped MgO(100)
T2 - Journal of Chemical Physics
AU - Valero, Rosendo
AU - Gomes, José R.B
AU - Truhlar, Donald G.
AU - ILLAS, FRANCESC
PY - 2010
DA - 2010/03/09
PB - AIP Publishing
SP - 104701
IS - 10
VL - 132
PMID - 20232978
SN - 0021-9606
SN - 1089-7690
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2010_Valero,
author = {Rosendo Valero and José R.B Gomes and Donald G. Truhlar and FRANCESC ILLAS},
title = {Density functional study of CO and NO adsorption on Ni-doped MgO(100)},
journal = {Journal of Chemical Physics},
year = {2010},
volume = {132},
publisher = {AIP Publishing},
month = {mar},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3340506},
number = {10},
pages = {104701},
doi = {10.1063/1.3340506}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Valero, Rosendo, et al. “Density functional study of CO and NO adsorption on Ni-doped MgO(100).” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 132, no. 10, Mar. 2010, p. 104701. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3340506.