volume 26 issue 3 pages 1196-1211

Urbanization drives cross‐taxon declines in abundance and diversity at multiple spatial scales

Elena Piano 1, 2
Caroline Souffreau 3
Thomas Merckx 4, 5
Lisa F Baardsen 6
Thierry Backeljau 1, 6
Dries Bonte 7
Kristien I. Brans 3
Marie Cours 8
Maxime Dahirel 7, 9
Nicolas Debortoli 10
E. Decaestecker 11
Katrien De Wolf 1, 12
Jessie M. T. Engelen 3
Andros T. Gianuca 3, 14
Lynn Govaert 3, 15, 16
Fabio T T Hanashiro 3
JANET HIGUTI 17
Luc Lens 7
Koen Martens 8, 18
Hans Matheve 7
Erik Matthysen 6
Eveline Pinseel 19, 20
Rose Sablon 1
Isa Schön 8, 21
Robby Stoks 22
Karine Van Doninck 10
Hans van Dyck 4
Pieter Vanormelingen 19
Jeroen Van Wichelen 19, 23
Wim Vyverman 19
Frederik Hendrickx 1, 7
1
 
Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences OD Taxonomy and Phylogeny Brussels Belgium
8
 
Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences OD Natural Environment Brussels Belgium
20
 
Research Department Meise Botanic Garden Meise Belgium
23
 
Aquatic Management Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO) Brussels Belgium
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2020-01-01
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR4.600
CiteScore20.5
Impact factor12.0
ISSN13541013, 13652486
PubMed ID:  31755626
Environmental Chemistry
General Environmental Science
Ecology
Global and Planetary Change
Abstract
The increasing urbanization process is hypothesized to drastically alter (semi-)natural environments with a concomitant major decline in species abundance and diversity. Yet, studies on this effect of urbanization, and the spatial scale at which it acts, are at present inconclusive due to the large heterogeneity in taxonomic groups and spatial scales at which this relationship has been investigated among studies. Comprehensive studies analysing this relationship across multiple animal groups and at multiple spatial scales are rare, hampering the assessment of how biodiversity generally responds to urbanization. We studied aquatic (cladocerans), limno-terrestrial (bdelloid rotifers) and terrestrial (butterflies, ground beetles, ground- and web spiders, macro-moths, orthopterans and snails) invertebrate groups using a hierarchical spatial design, wherein three local-scale (200 m × 200 m) urbanization levels were repeatedly sampled across three landscape-scale (3 km × 3 km) urbanization levels. We tested for local and landscape urbanization effects on abundance and species richness of each group, whereby total richness was partitioned into the average richness of local communities and the richness due to variation among local communities. Abundances of the terrestrial active dispersers declined in response to local urbanization, with reductions up to 85% for butterflies, while passive dispersers did not show any clear trend. Species richness also declined with increasing levels of urbanization, but responses were highly heterogeneous among the different groups with respect to the richness component and the spatial scale at which urbanization impacts richness. Depending on the group, species richness declined due to biotic homogenization and/or local species loss. This resulted in an overall decrease in total richness across groups in urban areas. These results provide strong support to the general negative impact of urbanization on abundance and species richness within habitat patches and highlight the importance of considering multiple spatial scales and taxa to assess the impacts of urbanization on biodiversity.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

5
10
15
20
25
Urban Ecosystems
23 publications, 9.06%
Ecology and Evolution
12 publications, 4.72%
Insect Conservation and Diversity
11 publications, 4.33%
Landscape Ecology
8 publications, 3.15%
Sustainability
7 publications, 2.76%
Science of the Total Environment
7 publications, 2.76%
Global Change Biology
7 publications, 2.76%
Scientific Reports
6 publications, 2.36%
Landscape and Urban Planning
6 publications, 2.36%
Ecological Indicators
6 publications, 2.36%
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
4 publications, 1.57%
Journal of Environmental Management
4 publications, 1.57%
Ecological Applications
4 publications, 1.57%
Global Ecology and Conservation
4 publications, 1.57%
Urban Forestry and Urban Greening
4 publications, 1.57%
Ecosphere
3 publications, 1.18%
Insects
3 publications, 1.18%
Journal of Insect Conservation
3 publications, 1.18%
Avian Research
3 publications, 1.18%
Journal of Animal Ecology
3 publications, 1.18%
Diversity and Distributions
3 publications, 1.18%
Diversity
3 publications, 1.18%
PeerJ
2 publications, 0.79%
Royal Society Open Science
2 publications, 0.79%
Frontiers in Environmental Science
2 publications, 0.79%
Frontiers in Sustainable Cities
2 publications, 0.79%
Biodiversity and Conservation
2 publications, 0.79%
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
2 publications, 0.79%
Ecography
2 publications, 0.79%
5
10
15
20
25

Publishers

10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Wiley
67 publications, 26.38%
Springer Nature
57 publications, 22.44%
Elsevier
54 publications, 21.26%
MDPI
19 publications, 7.48%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
15 publications, 5.91%
Frontiers Media S.A.
8 publications, 3.15%
Oxford University Press
6 publications, 2.36%
The Royal Society
3 publications, 1.18%
Taylor & Francis
3 publications, 1.18%
PeerJ
2 publications, 0.79%
IOP Publishing
2 publications, 0.79%
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
2 publications, 0.79%
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
2 publications, 0.79%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 0.39%
American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology
1 publication, 0.39%
Cambridge University Press
1 publication, 0.39%
Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique
1 publication, 0.39%
SciELO
1 publication, 0.39%
Canadian Science Publishing
1 publication, 0.39%
Pensoft Publishers
1 publication, 0.39%
Magnolia Press
1 publication, 0.39%
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
255
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Piano E. et al. Urbanization drives cross‐taxon declines in abundance and diversity at multiple spatial scales // Global Change Biology. 2020. Vol. 26. No. 3. pp. 1196-1211.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Piano E., Souffreau C., Merckx T., Baardsen L. F., Backeljau T., Bonte D., Brans K. I., Cours M., Dahirel M., Debortoli N., Decaestecker E., De Wolf K., Engelen J. M. T., Fontaneto D., Gianuca A. T., Govaert L., Hanashiro F. T. T., HIGUTI J., Lens L., Martens K., Matheve H., Matthysen E., Pinseel E., Sablon R., Schön I., Stoks R., Van Doninck K., Dyck H. V., Vanormelingen P., Van Wichelen J., Vyverman W., De Meester L., Hendrickx F. Urbanization drives cross‐taxon declines in abundance and diversity at multiple spatial scales // Global Change Biology. 2020. Vol. 26. No. 3. pp. 1196-1211.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1111/gcb.14934
UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14934
TI - Urbanization drives cross‐taxon declines in abundance and diversity at multiple spatial scales
T2 - Global Change Biology
AU - Piano, Elena
AU - Souffreau, Caroline
AU - Merckx, Thomas
AU - Baardsen, Lisa F
AU - Backeljau, Thierry
AU - Bonte, Dries
AU - Brans, Kristien I.
AU - Cours, Marie
AU - Dahirel, Maxime
AU - Debortoli, Nicolas
AU - Decaestecker, E.
AU - De Wolf, Katrien
AU - Engelen, Jessie M. T.
AU - Fontaneto, Diego
AU - Gianuca, Andros T.
AU - Govaert, Lynn
AU - Hanashiro, Fabio T T
AU - HIGUTI, JANET
AU - Lens, Luc
AU - Martens, Koen
AU - Matheve, Hans
AU - Matthysen, Erik
AU - Pinseel, Eveline
AU - Sablon, Rose
AU - Schön, Isa
AU - Stoks, Robby
AU - Van Doninck, Karine
AU - Dyck, Hans van
AU - Vanormelingen, Pieter
AU - Van Wichelen, Jeroen
AU - Vyverman, Wim
AU - De Meester, L.
AU - Hendrickx, Frederik
PY - 2020
DA - 2020/01/01
PB - Wiley
SP - 1196-1211
IS - 3
VL - 26
PMID - 31755626
SN - 1354-1013
SN - 1365-2486
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2020_Piano,
author = {Elena Piano and Caroline Souffreau and Thomas Merckx and Lisa F Baardsen and Thierry Backeljau and Dries Bonte and Kristien I. Brans and Marie Cours and Maxime Dahirel and Nicolas Debortoli and E. Decaestecker and Katrien De Wolf and Jessie M. T. Engelen and Diego Fontaneto and Andros T. Gianuca and Lynn Govaert and Fabio T T Hanashiro and JANET HIGUTI and Luc Lens and Koen Martens and Hans Matheve and Erik Matthysen and Eveline Pinseel and Rose Sablon and Isa Schön and Robby Stoks and Karine Van Doninck and Hans van Dyck and Pieter Vanormelingen and Jeroen Van Wichelen and Wim Vyverman and L. De Meester and Frederik Hendrickx},
title = {Urbanization drives cross‐taxon declines in abundance and diversity at multiple spatial scales},
journal = {Global Change Biology},
year = {2020},
volume = {26},
publisher = {Wiley},
month = {jan},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14934},
number = {3},
pages = {1196--1211},
doi = {10.1111/gcb.14934}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Piano, Elena, et al. “Urbanization drives cross‐taxon declines in abundance and diversity at multiple spatial scales.” Global Change Biology, vol. 26, no. 3, Jan. 2020, pp. 1196-1211. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14934.