SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
5.4
SJR
2.540
CiteScore
11.6
Categories
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Areas
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Years of issue
1978-2025
journal names
Ecography
Top-3 citing journals
Top-3 organizations
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/469a5/469a5302a904252e72d3feda0db35c443115fe27" alt="Lund University"
Lund University
(56 publications)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0d2f/c0d2fb3e1fcdd069a01a44623a57c50736967039" alt="Aarhus University"
Aarhus University
(52 publications)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4995/f499524312e0ba4e942686335f623ce57170e16a" alt="Stockholm University"
Stockholm University
(48 publications)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27c45/27c45fb98efa6bba96a7bba12efb3e08b2866702" alt="German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research"
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research
(31 publications)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10f58/10f582910cd8f82ebf132f6aa06759e4f46c3927" alt="University of Florida"
University of Florida
(23 publications)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0d2f/c0d2fb3e1fcdd069a01a44623a57c50736967039" alt="Aarhus University"
Aarhus University
(19 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 438
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c682a/c682a962a55957ef09e0a96bba0ab6fc8e04ed27" alt="Eco-Vector LLC"
The priority of bacteria Staphylococcus spp. in the etiology of PSI through the prism of new diagnostic capabilities. Literature review.
Borisov A., Golubkova A.A., Ruzhentsova T.A.
Representatives of the genus Staphylococcus spp. occupy a leading place in the etiology of infections caused by opportunistic bacteria. Staphylococcus spp., being symbionts of humans and/or animals, are constantly located on the surface of the skin and mucous membranes, which are their natural habitats.
The importance of bacteria of the genus Staphylococcus spp. It is determined by their significant distribution in the population, as well as among patients and medical personnel, due to their transient and resident carrier, as well as their high adaptive potential, due to their ability to form biofilms and produce enzymes that provide them with protection from antimicrobial drugs.
Modern molecular genetic methods for identifying Staphylococcus spp. and assessing their epidemic potential allow us to rethink their importance in the etiology of nosocomial purulent septic infections in a new way. It is no coincidence that they entered the group of ESCAPE pathogens with a high level of priority.
The ability of staphylococci to form biofilms ensures their survival in various hospital/environmental facilities, which in the conditions of a medical organization become additional, or so-called “inanimate” sources of infection.
In recent years, despite the increasing role of coagulase-negative staphylococci in the etiology of purulent septic infections, Staphylococcus aureus remains the most significant causative agent of purulent septic infections.
Q4
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a714c/a714cba67d6a535cdcd2e3ef3a45c806ed3ee354" alt="Publishing House OKI"
Mechanisms of Antiphage Defense in Prokaryotes
Daudova А.D., Demina Y.Z., Abdrakhmanova R.O., Baeva G.R., Rubalskaia T.S., Yasenyavskaya A.L., Rubalsky O.V., Samotrueva M.A.
The globalization of the problem of the formation of bacterial strains poly- and pan-resistant to known antimicrobial drugs creates high risks in the healthcare sector. The threat of a return to the «pre-antibiotic» era dictates the need to search for alternative forms of antibacterial therapy. Phage therapy, based on the use of a natural, widely distributed in the environment, accessible antimicrobial agent, is again becoming relevant. The article highlights the mechanisms of antiviral protection of prokaryotes at various stages of interaction between the virus and the target cell. Revealing the secrets of the confrontation between bacteria and viruses, their co-evolution is necessary to increase the effectiveness of phage therapy and develop modern means of overcoming bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents.
Q1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c798/4c7988da835e55bf19e419bbde34bf7e93b417c8" alt="MDPI"
A Novel Bifidobacterium longum Subsp. longum T1 Strain from Cow’s Milk: Homeostatic and Antibacterial Activity against ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli
Machulin A.V., Abramov V.M., Kosarev I.V., Deryusheva E.I., Priputnevich T.V., Panin A.N., Manoyan A.M., Chikileva I.O., Abashina T.N., Blumenkrants D.A., Ivanova O.E., Papazyan T.T., Nikonov I.N., Suzina N.E., Melnikov V.G., et. al.
Background/Objectives: The global emergence of antibiotic-resistant zooanthroponotic Escherichia coli strains, producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL-E) and persisting in the intestines of farm animals, has now led to the development of a pandemic of extra-intestinal infectious diseases in humans. The search for innovative probiotic microorganisms that eliminate ESBL-E from the intestines of humans and animals is relevant. Previously, we received three isolates of bifidobacteria: from milk of a calved cow (BLLT1), feces of a newborn calf (BLLT2) and feces of a three-year-old child who received fresh milk from this calved cow (BLLT3). Our goal was to evaluate the genetic identity of BLLT1, BLLT2, BLLT3 isolates using genomic DNA fingerprinting (GDF), to study the tolerance, adhesion, homeostatic and antibacterial activity of BLLT1 against ESBL-E. Methods: We used a complex of microbiological, molecular biological, and immunological methods, including next generation sequencing (NGS). Results: GDF showed that DNA fragments of BLLT2 and BLLT3 isolates were identical in number and size to DNA fragments of BLLT1. These data show for the first time the possibility of natural horizontal transmission of BLLT1 through with the milk of a calved cow into the intestines of a calf and the intestines of a child. BLLT1 was resistant to gastric and intestinal stresses and exhibited high adhesive activity to calf, pig, chicken, and human enterocytes. This indicates the unique ability of BLLT1 to inhabit the intestines of animals and humans. We are the first to show that BLLT1 has antibacterial activity against ESBL-E strains that persist in humans and animals. BLLT1 produced 145 ± 8 mM of acetic acid, which reduced the pH of the nutrient medium from 6.8 to 5.2. This had an antibacterial effect on ESBL-E. The genome of BLLT1 contains ABC-type carbohydrate transporter gene clusters responsible for the synthesis of acetic acid with its antibacterial activity against ESBL-E. BLLT1 inhibited TLR4 mRNA expression induced by ESBL-E in HT-29 enterocytes, and protected the enterocyte monolayers used in this study as a bio-model of the intestinal barrier. BLLT1 increased intestinal alkaline phosphatase (IAP) as one of the main molecular factors providing intestinal homeostasis. Conclusions: BLLT1 shows promise for the creation of innovative functional nutritional products for humans and feed additives for farm animals that will reduce the spread of ESBL-E strains in the food chain.
Q4
Analysis of the course and outcomes of COVID-19 at different stages of the pandemic in hemodialysis patients
Frolova N.F., Kim I.G., Chervinko V.I., Volodina E.V., Zubkin M.L.
The purpose of this study was a comparative analysis of the characteristics of the course and outcomes of COVID-19 in HD patients at different stages of the pandemic, focusing on the of the use of immunomodulatory therapy.Materials and methods. The retrospective study included 897 HD patients with COVID-19 (mean age 60.7 years, M 58.5%) who were hospitalized at Moscow City Hospital № 52. Group 1 (n=720) consisted of patients infected between the end of March 2020 and April 2021, group 2 (n=177) included patients hospitalized in May-December 2021. Each of group was divided into 2 subgroups based on treatment approaches. Subgroup 1a (n=231) included patients of the initial period of the pandemic who did not receive adequate immunomodulatory therapy, while Subgroup 1b (n=489) included patients of the late stage, were treated with IL-6 receptor blockers and corticosteroids. In group 2, 108 patients in Subgroup 2a received similar therapy, while 69 patients in Subgroup 2b were treated with neutralizing monoclonal antibodies in the early stages of the disease.Results. Mortality rates in Group 1 and Group 2 was 20.1% and 14.7%, respectively (p<0.09). The incidence of unfavorable outcome was highest in Subgroup 1a and lowest in Subgroup 2b (31.2% vs 5.8%, p<0.01). Mortality in Subgroups 1b and 2a was comparable (14.9% and 20.4%), despite more severe initial lung damage according to CT data in Subgroup 2a. In these patients, immunomodulators was more frequently combined with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). Independent risk factors for an unfavorable outcome were the progression of pulmonary pathology, with the transformation of stages CT 1-2 to CT 3-4, and a high comorbidity index.Conclusions. The use of immunomodulatory drugs imprtoved the effectiveness of COVID-19 treatment in patients with CKD5D. In severe cases, the most favorable outcomes were achieved with a combination of immunobiological drugs, corticosteroids, and TPE. An even more significant reduction in mortality was observed following the introduction of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies into clinical practice. Independent predictors of unfavorable outcome of COVID-19 in HD patients were a high comorbidity index and the progression of CT 1-2 into CT 3-4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf3f9/bf3f9e30a5c8e50c2eeb9ac7f93c47c7a9d28843" alt="LLC Global Media Technology"
Features of the course of COVID-19 in children with the spread of the Omicron variant
Ruzhentsova T.A., Garbuzov A.A., Bitsueva A.V., Rubleva O.V., Gorbunov S.G., Meshkova N.A., Popova R.V., Morozova E.N.
The aim of the study was to assess the symptoms and identify risk factors for prolonged and complicated COVID-19 during the spread of the Omicron variant in children aged 1 month to 18 years. Materials and methods. The study included 110 children with confirmed COVID-19 of mild or moderate severity at the time of the first examination. The average age of the patients was 6.86±5.09 years. The clinical symptoms, duration of each of the identified symptoms, and complications were evaluated. Acomparative analysis of possible risk factors for prolonged course and development of pneumonia was carried out. Results. The most common cases in children with COVID-19 were an increase in body temperature (in93%), runny nose (in65%), cough (in59%), hyperemia of the posterior pharyngeal wall (in95%) and tonsils (in93%), an increase in regional lymph nodes - in 43%. Among children with the duration of COVID-19 for 10 days or more, astatistically significant late request for medical help (onaverage, by 8.26±5.46 days, compared with 3.00 ± 1.32 days with the duration of the disease up to 10 days). Pneumonia is most often registered among preschool children. The average age in the group of children diagnosed with pneumonia is significantly less than in children who did not have signs of pneumonia of this complication (4.66 ±4.78 and 7.17±4.81, respectively). Conclusions: With the spread of the Omicron variant COVID-19 in children, infection with the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus is accompanied by symptoms of acute respiratory infection with an increase in body temperature, sore throat, hyperemia of the posterior wall of the pharynx and tonsils. Often there is an increase in regional lymph nodes, runny nose, cough, vomiting, less often - diarrhea. The prolonged course is facilitated by the late onset of adequate therapy. During the study, pneumonia was detected in 25% of children.
Q1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c798/4c7988da835e55bf19e419bbde34bf7e93b417c8" alt="MDPI"
Subgroup Analysis of TLR2, -3, -4 and -8 in Relation to the Severity of Clinical Manifestations of Cervical HPV Infection
Dushkin A., Afanasiev M., Afanasiev S., Grishacheva T., Biryukova E., Dushkina I., Karaulov A.
Q1
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c798/4c7988da835e55bf19e419bbde34bf7e93b417c8" alt="MDPI"
Open Access
,
PDF
|
Abstract
We present the findings of assessing the expression levels of extracellular TLR2 and TLR4 and intracellular TLR3 and TLR8 correlating with the severity of clinical manifestations of HPV infection. A total of 199 women took part in a single-center prospective comparative research study on TLR2, TLR3, TLR4 and TLR8 expression in HPV-related cervical lesions. TLRs’ mRNA expression was analyzed using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Our results indicate the potential significance of TLR3, TLR4 and TLR8 in responding to HPV infection and its progression to SILs and CC, highlighting the importance of HPV polyinfection in relation to TLR4 and TLR8.
Q4
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4bae0/4bae013ecfbdbc1a7172dd0314e8e642a8b71b8a" alt="Baltic Medical Education Center"
Optimal choice of indicators for timely assessment of the prognosis of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients
Ruzhentsova T.A., Mirzajonova D.B., Zhanibekov Z.Z., Khavkina D.A., Chukhliaev P.V., Borisova O.Y., Meshkova N.A.
The aim of the study was to identify the indicators that are most significant for predicting the features of the course of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients.Materials and methods. 250 case histories of patients aged 18 to 86 years with COVID-19 hospitalized in the hospital of the city of Nukus, Republic of Uzbekistan, redesigned to provide care to patients with COVID-19 from July 1, 2020 to March 2022, were analyzed. Patients who had a wave–like course of the disease with the development of complications, an increase in the volume of lung damage, were included in the main group (62 patients, 3 of whom were extremely severe). The patients who had stable positive dynamics (188 people) formed a comparison group.Results and discussion. Among patients over 65 years of age, 36% had a complicated course, in the 45–65 age group — 29% (p>0.05), and among patients under 45 years of age — 13% (p<0.05). The main group was dominated by men (79%). Among hospitalized villagers, an increase in the severity of the condition was noted in 30% of cases, and among patients from the city of Nukus, such patients were 20% (p<0.05). The highest values of D-dimer, interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein were in both groups, significant differences between the groups were revealed in the levels of D-dimer and interleukin-6. Significant differences between the groups were found in the levels of D-dimer, interleukin-6, ferritin, ALT, AST, and urea.Conclusion. COVID-19 has become one of the most studied diseases to date, but aspects of the course of this disease in certain population groups are still not sufficiently investigated. The complicated, progressive course of COVID-19, according to the results of our study, was recorded in all age groups of the adult population, more often in men from rural areas aged over 45 years with chronic diseases. The main prognostic markers of the complicated and progressive course of COVID-19 should be considered high levels of D-dimer, interleukin-6 and ferritin.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bff1/0bff1ba5eef3a381ddab92c0130e860f9350a170" alt="The Russian Academy of Sciences"
The Potential of Lectins and their Recognized Glycoconjugates in the Human Body
Lakhtin M.V., Lakhtin V.M., Mironov A.Y., Aleshkin V.A., Afanasyev S.S., Kombarova S.Y.
The modern concepts of lectins and glycoconjugates binding to them, the features and patterns of their interaction, the protective role and potential in the human body are summarized. The analysis of terms, approaches to classifications of lectins is carried out. The features of natural and synthetic glycoconjugates, recognized and bound by lectins, in symbiotic relationships, in innate immunity at the reception level are emphasized. The levels of specificity of lectins are considered. There is a need to expand research on the glycoconjugate specificity of lectins and their systems, to assess the communication potential of glycoconjugates in relation to any protein combinations and systems as lectins. The participation of lectin and glycoconjugate systems in signal transmission and communication is noted. Lectins manifest themselves as basic for superstructure glycoconjugate effectors in soluble and solid cell phases in cascade directed assemblies forming the interactome network. Lectins and glycoconjugates, as inextricably co-functioning, are promising in biology, medicine and biotechnologies.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31355/313552498661254c5261c666137ec6bc462b7474" alt="Springer Nature"
Isolation and Characterization of Salmonella Bacteriophages as Potential Agents for Phage Therapy of Antibiotic-Resistant Intestinal Infections
Pasivkina M.A., Anurova M.N., Kiseleva I.A., Andreeva A.A., Vorobev A.M., Mizaeva T.E., Mekhtiev E.R., Zubkova E.S., Alieva K.M., Kuzmin A.R., Karaulov A.V., Aleshkin A.V.
Two bacteriophages specifically active against to pathogenic strains of the Salmonella genus were isolated. The morphology of phage colonies (size, transparency, and shape of the plaque edge, and halo) and the spectrum of their lytic activity and interaction with microbial cells (adsorption rate, duration of the latency, and reproductive efficiency) were examined. Using genome-wide sequencing, we determined the taxonomic position of bacteriophages and verified the absence of unwanted genes encoding toxins, adhesins, and invasins, as well as pathogenicity islands responsible for antibiotic resistance. In addition, phage stability under different physical conditions and their productivity were studied.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31355/313552498661254c5261c666137ec6bc462b7474" alt="Springer Nature"
Assessment of the Safety of Anti-Salmonella Disinfectant for Veterinary Use Based on a Cocktail of Bacteriophages
Zulkarneev E.R., Laishevtsevtsev A.I., Kiseleva I.A., Efimova O.G., Mizaeva T.E., Pasivkina M.A., Zubkova E.S., Aleshkin A.V., Karaulov A.V.
The toxicity and safety of a veterinary anti-salmonella disinfectant based on three highly virulent bacteriophage strains (titers 1010 PFU/ml) were studied. Acute, chronic, and inhalation toxicity, as well as local irritancy of the disinfectant were evaluated on outbred white mice CD1 (n=65), Soviet chinchilla rabbits (n=20), and rats (n=20). No toxic effects of the disinfectant was observed after its intraperitoneal or intragastric administration to mice and intragastric administration to rats; in rabbits, application on the skin and eyes produced no local irritation effect. Inhalation of 10% of the disinfectant did not cause any pathologies in mice. Thus, the tests confirmed the high level of safety of the disinfectant based on a mixture of bacteriophages for use as an additional specific disinfection agent against Salmonella in veterinary and livestock facilities.
Q1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31355/313552498661254c5261c666137ec6bc462b7474" alt="Springer Nature"
Development of novel antimicrobials with engineered endolysin LysECD7-SMAP to combat Gram-negative bacterial infections
Vasina D.V., Antonova N.P., Gushchin V.A., Aleshkin A.V., Fursov M.V., Fursova A.D., Gancheva P.G., Grigoriev I.V., Grinkevich P., Kondratev A.V., Kostarnoy A.V., Lendel A.M., Makarov V.V., Nikiforova M.A., Pochtovyi A.A., et. al.
Abstract
Background
Among the non-traditional antibacterial agents in development, only a few targets critical Gram-negative bacteria such as carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii or cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Endolysins and their genetically modified versions meet the World Health Organization criteria for innovation, have a novel mode of antibacterial action, no known bacterial cross-resistance, and are being intensively studied for application against Gram-negative pathogens.
Methods
The study presents a multidisciplinary approach, including genetic engineering of LysECD7-SMAP and production of recombinant endolysin, its analysis by crystal structure solution following molecular dynamics simulations and evaluation of antibacterial properties. Two types of antimicrobial dosage forms were formulated, resulting in lyophilized powder for injection and hydroxyethylcellulose gel for topical administration. Their efficacy was estimated in the treatment of sepsis, and pneumonia models in BALB/c mice, diabetes-associated wound infection in the leptin receptor-deficient db/db mice and infected burn wounds in rats.
Results
In this work, we investigate the application strategies of the engineered endolysin LysECD7-SMAP and its dosage forms evaluated in preclinical studies. The catalytic domain of the enzyme shares the conserved structure of endopeptidases containing a putative antimicrobial peptide at the C-terminus of polypeptide chain. The activity of endolysins has been demonstrated against a range of pathogens, such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Achromobacter spp, Burkholderia cepacia complex and Haemophylus influenzae, including those with multidrug resistance. The efficacy of candidate dosage forms has been confirmed in in vivo studies. Some aspects of the interaction of LysECD7-SMAP with cell wall molecular targets are also discussed.
Conclusions
Our studies demonstrate the potential of LysECD7-SMAP therapeutics for the systemic or topical treatment of infectious diseases caused by susceptible Gram-negative bacterial species and are critical to proceed LysECD7-SMAP-based antimicrobials trials to advanced stages.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7bd30/7bd30b0fc16eca4a8d9e47856c1ca3f6e14779df" alt="Periodontal Association - RPA"
Forecasting changes in oral hygiene levels using the API index with different orthodontic appliances
Fedorova K.V., Gavrilova O.A., Zatevalov A.M.
Relevance. The prevalence of various types of orthodontic pathology among the Russian population is quite high. Depending on the region, malocclusion are registered in 30.9% to 76.5% of cases. The high prevalence of orthodontic pathology and the unresolved issues related to both the pathology itself and the presence of concomitant diseases indicate the necessity for personalized methods of prevention and treatment of malocclusion during both the primary and mixed dentitions, which in 70-84% of cases are treated using both removable and fixed orthodontic appliances.Materials and methods. An observational study was conducted to identify factors contributing to the increased intensity of caries among children aged 6 to 11 with orthodontic pathology. The study evaluated the characteristics of hygiene knowledge and skills, as well as the Approximal Plaque Index (API), in children using various orthodontic appliances. To assess hygiene knowledge levels, a survey was administered to two groups of children aged 6-11: those undergoing orthodontic treatment and those who visited the dental clinic for a routine check-up and were diagnosed with orthodontic pathology. The questionnaire included questions about the primary and supplementary tools and practices for daily oral hygiene, the frequency of hygiene activities, and the patients' awareness of the importance of professional oral hygiene.Results. Factors that statistically significantly influence the level of hygiene and the Approximal Plaque Index (API) were identified. A computer program was developed to forecast the dynamics of oral hygiene levels (based on the API index) when using different orthodontic appliances. An algorithm for predicting changes in the API hygiene index was created, considering the use of orthodontic appliances, oral status, adherence to hygiene procedures, presence of harmful habits, and dietary behaviors. Negative factors significantly impacting hygiene levels include bruxism and daily consumption of sweets, while positive factors include adherence to the recommended frequency and duration of tooth brushing (at least twice a day) and the use of a medium-hard toothbrush when permanent teeth are erupting. During orthodontic treatment, additional negative factors impacting hygiene status include gingival bleeding (gingivitis), lack of lip closure, and harmful habits. The study of changes in hygiene levels over one year of treatment with various orthodontic appliances (braces, Haas appliance, SPA) showed that the fixed Haas appliance for treating dental and maxillofacial anomalies is the most favorable orthodontic design for mixed dentition.Conclusion. Factors significantly affecting the level of oral hygiene have been identified. The dynamics of the API hygiene index with various orthodontic appliances have been established. The most favorable appliance for mixed dentition is the HAAS appliance for rapid palatal expansion.
Q4
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77494/774943f1349f754d65721f346f514948df386ceb" alt="LLC Numicom"
The State of Immunity of the Population of the Russian Federation to Rubella during the Elimination of Infection
Barkinkhoeva L.A., Turaeva N.V., Tsvirkun O.V., Gerasimova A.G.
Q4
Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention (Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika)
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77494/774943f1349f754d65721f346f514948df386ceb" alt="LLC Numicom"
Open Access
|
Abstract
Relevance. Serological monitoring of the state of the population's immunity to the rubella virus is one of the key elements of epidemiological surveillance of the infection, which makes it possible to assess the effectiveness of vaccine prevention, including the level of protection of the population from this infection. This article presents a comprehensive analysis of the results of this event in Russia for the period from 2015 to 2022 in individuals vaccinated against this infection, based on data from reports from regional centers and existing statistical models. The aim. To carry out a comprehensive analysis of data on serological monitoring of immunity among indicator groups of the population to rubella virus in the Russian Federation for the period from 2015 to 2022, taking into account the incidence and peculiarities of immunization tactics. Materials and Methods. Serological monitoring was carried out using standardized test systems and techniques, which ensured comparability of data throughout the entire study period (2015-2022). The contingent for the examination was selected with documentary confirmation of the fact of vaccination in the age groups 3–4 years, 9–10, 15–17, 25–29, 30–35 years. Only persons aged 40 years and older were examined without taking into account the vaccination history Results and Discussion. The conducted study confirmed a sufficient, stable level of immunity to the rubella virus in most age groups and regions of the country, which indicates the effectiveness of vaccination and the preservation (stabilization) of the infection elimination process. The slight increase in the average proportion of seronegatives among adults 30–35 and 40 years and older, revealed in the analysis, compared with other groups, requires further observation and clarification of the causes. Conclusions. The study confirmed the high level of immunity to rubella virus among the population of the Russian Federation, which indicates the effectiveness of the current program of vaccination against rubella infection and the infection elimination program. However, groups of the population have been identified, among which there is a slight decrease in the level of immunity, which requires additional attention from health authorities to maintain a stable rubella elimination status in the country. The results of the study will be used as additions to national and regional strategies aimed at maintaining the rubella elimination status.
Q4
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77494/774943f1349f754d65721f346f514948df386ceb" alt="LLC Numicom"
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing to Erythromycin and Azithromycin of Clinical Isolates of Bordetella pertussis Circulating in Russia
Pimenova A.S., Gadua N.T., Andrievskaya I.Y., Borisova O.Y., Petrova M.S., Borisova A.B., Afanas'ev S.S., Podoprigora I.V., Afanas'ev M.S., Moskvina T.I., Vorob'eva G.V., Degtyareva I.M., Timirkina O.V., Luk'yanceva S.A., Trigorlova T.N.
Q4
Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention (Epidemiologiya i Vaktsinoprofilaktika)
,
2024
,
citations by CoLab: 0
,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77494/774943f1349f754d65721f346f514948df386ceb" alt="LLC Numicom"
Open Access
|
Abstract
Relevance. Antibacterial drugs are widely used to treat and prevent infections of the upper and lower respiratory tract. The large-scale and unjustified use of antimicrobials to treat these infections has led to the emergence of resistance in most pathogens. The aim. To study antimicrobial susceptibility testing to erythromycin and azithromycin of strains of B. pertussis isolated in Russia. Materials & Methods. The research included 165 strains of B. pertussis isolated in January 2014 to June 2020. Antimicrobial susceptibility to erythromycin and azithromycin was determined by disk diffusion method and MIC test (HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Limited, India). The A2047G mutation in the 23S rRNA gene was detected by PCR and subsequent sequencing. Results. Disk diffusion zone diameters for erythromycin in the studied strains ranged from 25 to 62 mm (median 44 mm) and disk diffusion zone diameters for azithromycin ranged from 22 to 80 mm (median 50 mm). Isolates with growth inhibition of more than 42 mm in diameter after 7 days of incubation were considered as susceptible. Among the studied strains, 57 (34.5%) were resistant to erythromycin and 23 (13.9%) to azithromycin. Then, MIC of erythromycin and MIC of azithromycin, respectively, were determined for these 57 and 23 strains using the MIC test. The comparison group included 79 isolates that were classified as sensitive to erythromycin (n = 31) and azithromycin (n=48) according to the results of the previous study. A MIC value of 0.12 μg/ml was considered as the cut-off for susceptible strains. All isolates were fully susceptible to erythromycin (MIC ≤ 0.01 μg/ml, median MIC 0.001 μg/ml) and azithromycin (MIC ≤ 0.01 μg/ml, median MIC 0.0001 μg/ml). An A-to-G mutation was not found at position 2047 in the 23S rRNA gene in 80 isolates that had a diameter of growth inhibition zone less than 42 mm. Conclusion. This study demonstrates no significant decrease in the susceptibility to erythromycin and azithromycin among B. pertussis strains isolated in Russia in 2014–2020. The studied B. pertussis strains exhibit a homozygous phenotype for macrolide resistance.
Q3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c682a/c682a962a55957ef09e0a96bba0ab6fc8e04ed27" alt="Eco-Vector LLC"
Digital approach to estimate clinical images of the cervix with ImageJ software
Dushkin A.D., Afanasiev M.S., Afanasiev S.S., Grishacheva T.G., Karaulov A.V.
BACKGROUND: Visual inspection and colposcopy are subjective methods of cervical evaluation. Currently, the majority of colposcopes are equipped with the capacity to digitally transmit and record cervical images, in addition to modern software for image processing. For the objective assessment, prevention of development, and risk assessment of precancerous changes (SIL+) and cervical cancer, it is essential to use modern methods of image processing.
AIM: The study aimed at demonstrating the capabilities of digital analysis of cervical images based on ImageJ software [1].
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 500 colposcopic images of the Schiller test were obtained during dilated colposcopy. Digital analysis was performed using ImageJ software, which employed minimum (MinGV) and maximum (MaxGV) gray pixel values (0–255) and lesion surface area (%Area) as parameters. The images were divided into 4 groups according to the cytologic examination performed: healthy donors (n=19; 3.8%), mild grade squamous cell intraepithelial lesion (n=113; 22.6%), severe grade squamous cell intraepithelial lesion (n=327; 65.4%), and invasive cervical cancer (n=41; 8.2%). Mathematical and statistical analysis of the obtained data was performed using Python programming language packages in the Google Colab environment. Comparisons of quantitative measures between three or more groups were conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis criterion and posteriori comparisons by Dunn’s criterion with Holm’s correction.
RESULSTS: Statistical significance was observed in the increase of MinGV (p=0.035), MaxGV (p0.001) and %Area (p=0.022) from the mild (88/141/31) to the severe (83/142/32) degree of squamous cell intraepithelial lesion and cervical cancer (88/162/36). Objective parameters for the assessment of the degree of cervical surface lesions during digital colposcopy were obtained. Digital analysis of the cervical surface may assist the clinical specialist in determining further management strategies, including scarification or incisional biopsy with subsequent morphological examination.
CONCLUSIONS: The application of digital analysis to colposcopic images has the potential to reduce the subjective assessment of cervical condition, enhance the efficiency of the initial appointment with a gynecologist, and facilitate the selection of patients for cytologic examination.
Top-100
Citing journals
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
|
|
Ecography
6092 citations, 3.07%
|
|
PLoS ONE
5063 citations, 2.55%
|
|
Ecology and Evolution
4509 citations, 2.27%
|
|
Journal of Biogeography
4312 citations, 2.17%
|
|
Biological Conservation
3254 citations, 1.64%
|
|
Diversity and Distributions
3209 citations, 1.62%
|
|
Global Ecology and Biogeography
3029 citations, 1.53%
|
|
Forest Ecology and Management
2738 citations, 1.38%
|
|
Scientific Reports
2639 citations, 1.33%
|
|
Biodiversity and Conservation
2343 citations, 1.18%
|
|
Science of the Total Environment
2040 citations, 1.03%
|
|
Global Change Biology
2010 citations, 1.01%
|
|
Ecological Indicators
1971 citations, 0.99%
|
|
Landscape Ecology
1820 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Ecology
1728 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Ecological Modelling
1727 citations, 0.87%
|
|
Ecosphere
1712 citations, 0.86%
|
|
Oecologia
1660 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Oikos
1648 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Global Ecology and Conservation
1565 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Forests
1446 citations, 0.73%
|
|
Journal of Vegetation Science
1340 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
1306 citations, 0.66%
|
|
Journal of Ecology
1281 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Journal of Animal Ecology
1265 citations, 0.64%
|
|
Biological Invasions
1247 citations, 0.63%
|
|
PeerJ
1187 citations, 0.6%
|
|
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
1082 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Diversity
1073 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Ecological Informatics
1069 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Ecology Letters
1043 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
1007 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Molecular Ecology
1004 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Hydrobiologia
1003 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Ecological Applications
979 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Journal of Applied Ecology
945 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Freshwater Biology
877 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Journal of Insect Conservation
781 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Frontiers in Marine Science
767 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Acta Oecologica
687 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Plant Ecology
679 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Insect Conservation and Diversity
655 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Marine Ecology - Progress Series
654 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
646 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Biotropica
628 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
623 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Conservation Biology
592 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Biological Reviews
588 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Mammalogy
582 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Functional Ecology
577 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Austral Ecology
562 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Frontiers in Plant Science
559 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal for Nature Conservation
551 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Zoology
548 citations, 0.28%
|
|
American Naturalist
538 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Insects
533 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Basic and Applied Ecology
532 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Remote Sensing
491 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
466 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Nature Communications
466 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Ecological Entomology
465 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Sustainability
445 citations, 0.22%
|
|
New Phytologist
431 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Plants
416 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Trends in Ecology and Evolution
400 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Wildlife Management
398 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Ecological Research
393 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Management
380 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
358 citations, 0.18%
|
|
European Journal of Wildlife Research
353 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Polar Biology
343 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Ibis
342 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Zoology
341 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Forest Research
334 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Animals
331 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Arid Environments
325 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Landscape and Urban Planning
322 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Ecoscience
291 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Environmental Entomology
290 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Urban Ecosystems
286 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Animal Conservation
286 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics
284 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Applied Vegetation Science
282 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Wildlife Biology
278 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Ornithology
277 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Mammalian Biology
270 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Ecological Monographs
266 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Nature Ecology and Evolution
254 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Evolution; international journal of organic evolution
248 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
245 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
244 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Ecosystems
236 citations, 0.12%
|
|
American Journal of Botany
233 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Flora: Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants
229 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Avian Biology
228 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Annals of Botany
219 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Parasitology
216 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Plant and Soil
212 citations, 0.11%
|
|
European Journal of Forest Research
210 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
206 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
|
Citing publishers
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
|
|
Wiley
61531 citations, 31%
|
|
Elsevier
34990 citations, 17.63%
|
|
Springer Nature
33157 citations, 16.71%
|
|
MDPI
8436 citations, 4.25%
|
|
Oxford University Press
5651 citations, 2.85%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
5510 citations, 2.78%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
4491 citations, 2.26%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
4474 citations, 2.25%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
4196 citations, 2.11%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
3457 citations, 1.74%
|
|
The Royal Society
2242 citations, 1.13%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
1600 citations, 0.81%
|
|
PeerJ
1270 citations, 0.64%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
1148 citations, 0.58%
|
|
Inter-Research Science Center
1145 citations, 0.58%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
1044 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
1038 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
795 citations, 0.4%
|
|
SAGE
651 citations, 0.33%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
519 citations, 0.26%
|
|
SciELO
504 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
490 citations, 0.25%
|
|
IOP Publishing
470 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Copernicus
455 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Entomological Society of America
427 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Annual Reviews
390 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
346 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
325 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Nordic Council for Wildlife Research
295 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Magnolia Press
253 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
252 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
222 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board
220 citations, 0.11%
|
|
University of Colorado
211 citations, 0.11%
|
|
202 citations, 0.1%
|
|
American Geophysical Union
178 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Museum and Institute of Zoology at the Polish Academy of Sciences
178 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Humboldt Field Research Institute
168 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
162 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Brazilian Association for Ecological Science and Conservation
148 citations, 0.07%
|
|
The Company of Biologists
127 citations, 0.06%
|
|
EDP Sciences
126 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Northeast Forestry University
122 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Wilson Ornithological Society
120 citations, 0.06%
|
|
National Research Council Canada
120 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Brill
117 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Bryological & Lichenological Society
116 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Ornithologists' Union
115 citations, 0.06%
|
|
University of Notre Dame
109 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles
109 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Mammal Research Institute
109 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
108 citations, 0.05%
|
|
eLife Sciences Publications
106 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
104 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Academia Brasileira de Ciencias
94 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Herpetologists League
81 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
76 citations, 0.04%
|
|
74 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists
74 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IGI Global
73 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Norwegian Polar Institute
70 citations, 0.04%
|
|
66 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Polish Academy of Sciences Chancellery
65 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
64 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
63 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Biology Centre, AS CR
63 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Physical Society (APS)
62 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Ecological Society of China
62 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Emerald
61 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Sociedad Espanola de Ornitologia
60 citations, 0.03%
|
|
National Inquiry Services Center (NISC)
60 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Italian Society of Sivilculture and Forest Ecology (SISEF)
52 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Raptor Research Foundation, Inc.
48 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Torrey Botanical Society
48 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Natural Areas Journal
48 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Biodiversity Information Facility
47 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IntechOpen
47 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
46 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Coleopterists Society
43 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Waterbird Society
43 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Scientific Societies
42 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mammalogical Society of Japan
41 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Brigham Young University
40 citations, 0.02%
|
|
AOSIS
40 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
39 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Southwestern Association of Naturalists
39 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
38 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria
37 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Arachnological Society
37 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society of Parasitologists
36 citations, 0.02%
|
|
35 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society of Parasitology
35 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Russian Academy of Sciences
35 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
33 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden
33 citations, 0.02%
|
|
International Association for Plant Taxonomy
33 citations, 0.02%
|
|
32 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France
31 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Meteorological Society
31 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Freshwater Biological Association
31 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
|
Lund University
56 publications, 1.3%
|
|
Aarhus University
52 publications, 1.21%
|
|
Stockholm University
48 publications, 1.12%
|
|
University of Alberta
48 publications, 1.12%
|
|
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research
48 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Imperial College London
47 publications, 1.09%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
45 publications, 1.05%
|
|
University of Florida
44 publications, 1.02%
|
|
University of British Columbia
43 publications, 1%
|
|
Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
42 publications, 0.98%
|
|
Uppsala University
41 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Arizona
39 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
37 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
36 publications, 0.84%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
35 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
34 publications, 0.79%
|
|
University of Göttingen
34 publications, 0.79%
|
|
James Cook University
33 publications, 0.77%
|
|
McGill University
33 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
33 publications, 0.77%
|
|
University of Helsinki
32 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Cornell University
32 publications, 0.74%
|
|
ETH Zurich
31 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Doñana Biological Station
31 publications, 0.72%
|
|
University of Toronto
30 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Yale University
29 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of California, Davis
29 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Australian National University
28 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Washington
28 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
28 publications, 0.65%
|
|
University of Connecticut
28 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Umeå University
27 publications, 0.63%
|
|
University of Aberdeen
27 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
27 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Michigan State University
26 publications, 0.61%
|
|
Oregon State University
26 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Minnesota
26 publications, 0.61%
|
|
University of Cambridge
25 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Stellenbosch University
25 publications, 0.58%
|
|
San Diego State University
25 publications, 0.58%
|
|
University of Exeter
25 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Spanish National Museum of Natural Sciences
25 publications, 0.58%
|
|
Peking University
24 publications, 0.56%
|
|
University of New South Wales
24 publications, 0.56%
|
|
Duke University
23 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Potsdam
23 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Leeds
23 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Sheffield
23 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
23 publications, 0.54%
|
|
University of Colorado Boulder
22 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Macquarie University
21 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Stanford University
21 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Colorado State University
21 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Centre for Research on Ecology and Forestry Applications
21 publications, 0.49%
|
|
University of Vienna
21 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Natural Environment Research Council
21 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
19 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of St Andrews
19 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Michigan
19 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Université Laval
19 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Oslo
18 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Sorbonne University
18 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Charles University
18 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies
18 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
17 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
17 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Harvard University
17 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
17 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Goethe University Frankfurt
17 publications, 0.4%
|
|
University of Turku
16 publications, 0.37%
|
|
North Carolina State University
16 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of California, Santa Cruz
16 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
16 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
16 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Oviedo
16 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
15 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Oxford
15 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research
15 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Arizona State University
15 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Philipps University of Marburg
15 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre
15 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University
15 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Utah State University
15 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
14 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Ohio State University
14 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
14 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Universidad de Alcalá
14 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Barcelona
14 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Calgary
14 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Guelph
14 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Tennessee
14 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of York
14 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
13 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Griffith University
13 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Australian Research Council
13 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Princeton University
13 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Northern Arizona University
13 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
13 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of East Anglia
13 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Natural Resources Canada
13 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
|
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research
31 publications, 4.26%
|
|
University of Florida
23 publications, 3.16%
|
|
Aarhus University
19 publications, 2.61%
|
|
University of Göttingen
19 publications, 2.61%
|
|
University of British Columbia
18 publications, 2.48%
|
|
Grenoble Alpes University
16 publications, 2.2%
|
|
ETH Zurich
16 publications, 2.2%
|
|
Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
16 publications, 2.2%
|
|
University of Arizona
16 publications, 2.2%
|
|
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
15 publications, 2.06%
|
|
Yale University
14 publications, 1.93%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
14 publications, 1.93%
|
|
University of Helsinki
13 publications, 1.79%
|
|
University of Vienna
13 publications, 1.79%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
12 publications, 1.65%
|
|
Doñana Biological Station
12 publications, 1.65%
|
|
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
11 publications, 1.51%
|
|
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
11 publications, 1.51%
|
|
Macquarie University
11 publications, 1.51%
|
|
University of Washington
11 publications, 1.51%
|
|
University of Michigan
11 publications, 1.51%
|
|
Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University
11 publications, 1.51%
|
|
Spanish National Museum of Natural Sciences
11 publications, 1.51%
|
|
University of Connecticut
11 publications, 1.51%
|
|
Cornell University
10 publications, 1.38%
|
|
Charles University
10 publications, 1.38%
|
|
University of Aberdeen
10 publications, 1.38%
|
|
McGill University
10 publications, 1.38%
|
|
University of Potsdam
10 publications, 1.38%
|
|
UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
10 publications, 1.38%
|
|
University of New South Wales
9 publications, 1.24%
|
|
University of California, Davis
9 publications, 1.24%
|
|
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
9 publications, 1.24%
|
|
Philipps University of Marburg
9 publications, 1.24%
|
|
University of Porto
9 publications, 1.24%
|
|
Louisiana State University
9 publications, 1.24%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
8 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Humboldt University of Berlin
8 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Stockholm University
8 publications, 1.1%
|
|
East China Normal University
8 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
8 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Cambridge
8 publications, 1.1%
|
|
James Cook University
8 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Arizona State University
8 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Oregon State University
8 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Northern Arizona University
8 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of California, Santa Cruz
8 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Centre for Ecological Research
8 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Centre for Research on Ecology and Forestry Applications
8 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Lanzhou University
8 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of St Andrews
8 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Minnesota
8 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
8 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
8 publications, 1.1%
|
|
University of Toronto
8 publications, 1.1%
|
|
Peking University
7 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
7 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Australian National University
7 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
7 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Imperial College London
7 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Sorbonne University
7 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Michigan State University
7 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
7 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Colorado State University
7 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Harvard University
7 publications, 0.96%
|
|
University of Oviedo
7 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Environment and Climate Change Canada
7 publications, 0.96%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
6 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
6 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Zurich
6 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research
6 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Nelson Mandela University
6 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
6 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Lancaster University
6 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg
6 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Konstanz
6 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
6 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Regensburg
6 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre
6 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Leeds
6 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Naturalis Biodiversity Center
6 publications, 0.83%
|
|
University of Miami
6 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Utah State University
6 publications, 0.83%
|
|
École pratique des hautes études
6 publications, 0.83%
|
|
Technical University of Munich
5 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Lausanne
5 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Queen Mary University of London
5 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
5 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Queensland
5 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Stellenbosch University
5 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
5 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
5 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Autonomous University of Madrid
5 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Bristol
5 publications, 0.69%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
5 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Swansea University
5 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Université de Sherbrooke
5 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Goethe University Frankfurt
5 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Utrecht University
5 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Berlin Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research
5 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
|
USA
|
USA, 999, 23.25%
USA
999 publications, 23.25%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 488, 11.36%
United Kingdom
488 publications, 11.36%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 383, 8.91%
Sweden
383 publications, 8.91%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 338, 7.87%
Canada
338 publications, 7.87%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 302, 7.03%
Germany
302 publications, 7.03%
|
France
|
France, 287, 6.68%
France
287 publications, 6.68%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 273, 6.35%
Australia
273 publications, 6.35%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 270, 6.28%
Spain
270 publications, 6.28%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 232, 5.4%
Norway
232 publications, 5.4%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 207, 4.82%
Finland
207 publications, 4.82%
|
China
|
China, 173, 4.03%
China
173 publications, 4.03%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 168, 3.91%
Switzerland
168 publications, 3.91%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 157, 3.65%
Denmark
157 publications, 3.65%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 137, 3.19%
Brazil
137 publications, 3.19%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 106, 2.47%
Netherlands
106 publications, 2.47%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 92, 2.14%
Belgium
92 publications, 2.14%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 86, 2%
New Zealand
86 publications, 2%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 84, 1.95%
Italy
84 publications, 1.95%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 81, 1.89%
South Africa
81 publications, 1.89%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 69, 1.61%
Czech Republic
69 publications, 1.61%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 61, 1.42%
Portugal
61 publications, 1.42%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 50, 1.16%
Japan
50 publications, 1.16%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 44, 1.02%
Austria
44 publications, 1.02%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 42, 0.98%
Mexico
42 publications, 0.98%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 41, 0.95%
Argentina
41 publications, 0.95%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 37, 0.86%
Israel
37 publications, 0.86%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 37, 0.86%
Poland
37 publications, 0.86%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 35, 0.81%
Chile
35 publications, 0.81%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 26, 0.61%
Russia
26 publications, 0.61%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 25, 0.58%
Colombia
25 publications, 0.58%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 22, 0.51%
Ecuador
22 publications, 0.51%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 20, 0.47%
Hungary
20 publications, 0.47%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 19, 0.44%
Ireland
19 publications, 0.44%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 16, 0.37%
Estonia
16 publications, 0.37%
|
India
|
India, 14, 0.33%
India
14 publications, 0.33%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 14, 0.33%
Indonesia
14 publications, 0.33%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 14, 0.33%
Panama
14 publications, 0.33%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 11, 0.26%
Iceland
11 publications, 0.26%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 9, 0.21%
Greece
9 publications, 0.21%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 9, 0.21%
Costa Rica
9 publications, 0.21%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 9, 0.21%
Peru
9 publications, 0.21%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 8, 0.19%
Slovenia
8 publications, 0.19%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 7, 0.16%
Malaysia
7 publications, 0.16%
|
Bolivia
|
Bolivia, 6, 0.14%
Bolivia
6 publications, 0.14%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 6, 0.14%
Turkey
6 publications, 0.14%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 5, 0.12%
Kenya
5 publications, 0.12%
|
New Caledonia
|
New Caledonia, 5, 0.12%
New Caledonia
5 publications, 0.12%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 5, 0.12%
Singapore
5 publications, 0.12%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 4, 0.09%
Botswana
4 publications, 0.09%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 4, 0.09%
Venezuela
4 publications, 0.09%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 4, 0.09%
Cameroon
4 publications, 0.09%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 4, 0.09%
Luxembourg
4 publications, 0.09%
|
Madagascar
|
Madagascar, 4, 0.09%
Madagascar
4 publications, 0.09%
|
Papua New Guinea
|
Papua New Guinea, 4, 0.09%
Papua New Guinea
4 publications, 0.09%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 3, 0.07%
Bulgaria
3 publications, 0.07%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 3, 0.07%
Brunei
3 publications, 0.07%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 3, 0.07%
Lithuania
3 publications, 0.07%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 3, 0.07%
Morocco
3 publications, 0.07%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 3, 0.07%
Puerto Rico
3 publications, 0.07%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 3, 0.07%
Republic of Korea
3 publications, 0.07%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 3, 0.07%
Serbia
3 publications, 0.07%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 3, 0.07%
Tanzania
3 publications, 0.07%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 3, 0.07%
Uruguay
3 publications, 0.07%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 2, 0.05%
Armenia
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Gabon
|
Gabon, 2, 0.05%
Gabon
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 2, 0.05%
Georgia
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 2, 0.05%
Zimbabwe
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 2, 0.05%
Cyprus
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo, 2, 0.05%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Mozambique
|
Mozambique, 2, 0.05%
Mozambique
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 2, 0.05%
Mongolia
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Myanmar
|
Myanmar, 2, 0.05%
Myanmar
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Namibia
|
Namibia, 2, 0.05%
Namibia
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 2, 0.05%
Romania
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 2, 0.05%
Slovakia
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Sudan
|
Sudan, 2, 0.05%
Sudan
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 2, 0.05%
Thailand
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 2, 0.05%
Uganda
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 2, 0.05%
Philippines
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 2, 0.05%
Croatia
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 2, 0.05%
Ethiopia
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Czechoslovakia
|
Czechoslovakia, 2, 0.05%
Czechoslovakia
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.02%
Ukraine
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Angola
|
Angola, 1, 0.02%
Angola
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Benin
|
Benin, 1, 0.02%
Benin
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.02%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Gambia
|
Gambia, 1, 0.02%
Gambia
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Guatemala
|
Guatemala, 1, 0.02%
Guatemala
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Greenland
|
Greenland, 1, 0.02%
Greenland
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 1, 0.02%
Egypt
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 1, 0.02%
Zambia
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Cape Verde
|
Cape Verde, 1, 0.02%
Cape Verde
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.02%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 1, 0.02%
Latvia
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Mauritius
|
Mauritius, 1, 0.02%
Mauritius
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 1, 0.02%
Malawi
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Martinique
|
Martinique, 1, 0.02%
Martinique
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Palau
|
Palau, 1, 0.02%
Palau
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Paraguay
|
Paraguay, 1, 0.02%
Paraguay
1 publication, 0.02%
|
El Salvador
|
El Salvador, 1, 0.02%
El Salvador
1 publication, 0.02%
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
|
USA
|
USA, 295, 40.58%
USA
295 publications, 40.58%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 133, 18.29%
United Kingdom
133 publications, 18.29%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 121, 16.64%
Germany
121 publications, 16.64%
|
China
|
China, 91, 12.52%
China
91 publications, 12.52%
|
France
|
France, 87, 11.97%
France
87 publications, 11.97%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 86, 11.83%
Australia
86 publications, 11.83%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 86, 11.83%
Spain
86 publications, 11.83%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 84, 11.55%
Canada
84 publications, 11.55%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 63, 8.67%
Switzerland
63 publications, 8.67%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 52, 7.15%
Brazil
52 publications, 7.15%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 47, 6.46%
Finland
47 publications, 6.46%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 43, 5.91%
Norway
43 publications, 5.91%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 40, 5.5%
Italy
40 publications, 5.5%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 37, 5.09%
Netherlands
37 publications, 5.09%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 37, 5.09%
Czech Republic
37 publications, 5.09%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 37, 5.09%
Sweden
37 publications, 5.09%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 34, 4.68%
Denmark
34 publications, 4.68%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 30, 4.13%
New Zealand
30 publications, 4.13%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 27, 3.71%
Japan
27 publications, 3.71%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 24, 3.3%
Portugal
24 publications, 3.3%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 21, 2.89%
Belgium
21 publications, 2.89%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 21, 2.89%
South Africa
21 publications, 2.89%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 17, 2.34%
Austria
17 publications, 2.34%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 15, 2.06%
Argentina
15 publications, 2.06%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 14, 1.93%
Colombia
14 publications, 1.93%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 14, 1.93%
Chile
14 publications, 1.93%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 11, 1.51%
Mexico
11 publications, 1.51%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 10, 1.38%
Hungary
10 publications, 1.38%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 9, 1.24%
Russia
9 publications, 1.24%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 8, 1.1%
Indonesia
8 publications, 1.1%
|
India
|
India, 7, 0.96%
India
7 publications, 0.96%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 6, 0.83%
Israel
6 publications, 0.83%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 6, 0.83%
Ecuador
6 publications, 0.83%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 5, 0.69%
Poland
5 publications, 0.69%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 4, 0.55%
Estonia
4 publications, 0.55%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 4, 0.55%
Greece
4 publications, 0.55%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 4, 0.55%
Costa Rica
4 publications, 0.55%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 4, 0.55%
Panama
4 publications, 0.55%
|
Bolivia
|
Bolivia, 3, 0.41%
Bolivia
3 publications, 0.41%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 3, 0.41%
Iceland
3 publications, 0.41%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 3, 0.41%
Malaysia
3 publications, 0.41%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 3, 0.41%
Peru
3 publications, 0.41%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 3, 0.41%
Puerto Rico
3 publications, 0.41%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 3, 0.41%
Singapore
3 publications, 0.41%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 3, 0.41%
Slovenia
3 publications, 0.41%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 2, 0.28%
Venezuela
2 publications, 0.28%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 0.28%
Ireland
2 publications, 0.28%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 2, 0.28%
Cameroon
2 publications, 0.28%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 2, 0.28%
Kenya
2 publications, 0.28%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 2, 0.28%
Cyprus
2 publications, 0.28%
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo, 2, 0.28%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
2 publications, 0.28%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 2, 0.28%
Lithuania
2 publications, 0.28%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 2, 0.28%
Luxembourg
2 publications, 0.28%
|
Madagascar
|
Madagascar, 2, 0.28%
Madagascar
2 publications, 0.28%
|
Mozambique
|
Mozambique, 2, 0.28%
Mozambique
2 publications, 0.28%
|
Myanmar
|
Myanmar, 2, 0.28%
Myanmar
2 publications, 0.28%
|
Namibia
|
Namibia, 2, 0.28%
Namibia
2 publications, 0.28%
|
New Caledonia
|
New Caledonia, 2, 0.28%
New Caledonia
2 publications, 0.28%
|
Sudan
|
Sudan, 2, 0.28%
Sudan
2 publications, 0.28%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 2, 0.28%
Thailand
2 publications, 0.28%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 2, 0.28%
Turkey
2 publications, 0.28%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 2, 0.28%
Croatia
2 publications, 0.28%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.14%
Ukraine
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Angola
|
Angola, 1, 0.14%
Angola
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Armenia
|
Armenia, 1, 0.14%
Armenia
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Benin
|
Benin, 1, 0.14%
Benin
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Brunei
|
Brunei, 1, 0.14%
Brunei
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Gambia
|
Gambia, 1, 0.14%
Gambia
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Greenland
|
Greenland, 1, 0.14%
Greenland
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 1, 0.14%
Georgia
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 1, 0.14%
Zambia
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 1, 0.14%
Zimbabwe
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.14%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Mauritius
|
Mauritius, 1, 0.14%
Mauritius
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 1, 0.14%
Malawi
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 1, 0.14%
Mongolia
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Palau
|
Palau, 1, 0.14%
Palau
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Papua New Guinea
|
Papua New Guinea, 1, 0.14%
Papua New Guinea
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Paraguay
|
Paraguay, 1, 0.14%
Paraguay
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 1, 0.14%
Republic of Korea
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.14%
Romania
1 publication, 0.14%
|
El Salvador
|
El Salvador, 1, 0.14%
El Salvador
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.14%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 1, 0.14%
Tanzania
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.14%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Faroe Islands
|
Faroe Islands, 1, 0.14%
Faroe Islands
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 1, 0.14%
Philippines
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
|
Falkland Islands (Malvinas), 1, 0.14%
Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 1, 0.14%
Sri Lanka
1 publication, 0.14%
|
Show all (59 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
3 profile journal articles
Boyce Mark
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c16d/9c16dd1b355bbf028df4e5141c5528934a280e37" alt="University of Alberta"
University of Alberta
270 publications,
23 248 citations
h-index: 75
1 profile journal article
Ren Peng
21 publications,
130 citations
h-index: 6
1 profile journal article
Bussmann Rainer
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aabd0/aabd0785133143c9cb73cae42f5171ce782c7c9a" alt="Ilia State University"
Ilia State University
349 publications,
17 222 citations
h-index: 63
1 profile journal article
Sokolov Aleksandr
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92cb9/92cb97e8967c81e966733c0febbf9d809a067ce0" alt="Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences"
Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
69 publications,
1 372 citations
h-index: 20
1 profile journal article
Chen Dima
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa22b/aa22bf273d968f960cd103c050b3875d5c03f460" alt="Inner Mongolia University"
Inner Mongolia University
93 publications,
4 391 citations
h-index: 33
1 profile journal article
Megan Kathryn
25 publications,
1 006 citations
h-index: 16
1 profile journal article
Ponge Jean-François
186 publications,
6 462 citations
h-index: 46